Dear imad. I noted your recent edit on the Al-Husayni page. I and a few others hope presently to revise it thoroughly, since the information is poorly organised, often does not reflect the texts cited, and highly, confusedly POV. I have edited the large section drawn from Schwanitz, for that writer knowingly made light of and mocked the words in Husayni's own diary. It would indeed help if, over the next several months, you could keep your eye out, or consult a library in Amman (?) for the Arabic original of the source Schwanitz quotes, namely Abd al-Karim al-Umar (ed.), Memoirs of the Grand Mufti, Damascus in 1999 and check esp. p.126, for the conversation with Himmler. I am sure, from memory, that after citing Himmler, Al-Husayni does express surprise (perhaps he himself took this as just a German kind of political rhetorical overstatement he was accustomed to). Best regards Nishidani ( talk) 12:49, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
'Our fundamental condition for cooperating with Germany was a free hand to eradicate every last Jew from Palestine and the Arab world. I asked Hitler for an explicit undertaking to allow us to solve the Jewish problem in a manner befitting our national and racial aspirations and according to the scientific methods innovated by Germany in the handling of its Jews. The answer I got was: 'The Jews are yours.'
Dear Imad marie,
I appreciate your interest in my user page, but I must insist that you refrain from editing it. I reverted all three of your edits to my user page. I do not edit your user page because I respect your right to put whatever you want on your own user page. I expect the same kind of respect in return. If you have a problem with something on my user page, I am open to suggestions on how to improve it. If I agree with those suggestions, then I myself will edit my user page accordingly. Thank you for understanding. --
GHcool (
talk) 16:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. Please be careful about comments such as the one you made at this link. First of all, Ncmvocalist and I were trying to mediate with GHcool, and your inserting yourself into the conversation at that time was unhelpful. WQA has no binding authority, but we are usually pretty good at getting people to agree to a compromise when such compromise is possible. Insulting the other editor while we are trying to negotiate with him is not going to help achieve that goal.
In addition, saying that "Wikipedia would be better off" without an editor could be construed as a direct personal attack. Whatever GHcool has or hasn't done, this does not excuse negative behavior on the part of other editors. Please be more careful about this in the future. Thanks! -- Jaysweet ( talk) 17:59, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
For info. Jaakobou now seems to have come round to the idea of merging, but not quite in the same way. I have posted a note on his talk page about it. Since he'll accuse me of being uncivil anyway, I may as well come straight out and say that I think it's pretty shameless on his part. -- Nickhh ( talk) 12:44, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
You've been noted to not remove the link to the main "Celebrations" article and yet you continue to remove it "per consensus"?!
[1],
[2] I request that you desist from behaving in a disruptive manner and follow proper procedures rather than undermine the policies by playing
revert games.
With respect,
Jaakobou
Chalk Talk 10:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
You've removed a cartoon claiming "per this PMW is not RS" [3] while that link shows nothing to substantiate your claim. Giving out incorrect, and possibly misleading edit summaries is a violation of wikipedia policies and I request that you do not repeat such an edit without achieving a proper consensus. Jaakobou Chalk Talk 10:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC) adding repeat reference, "No, see talk" [4] 16:59, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Good call. :) Kyaa the Catlord ( talk) 07:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, you've been mentioned in a posting at this website. ( permanent link) Let me know if you experience any problems regarding this. Cheers. lifebaka ++ 20:54, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi Imad-Marie. The reason that I did not put a source for my edits in the Qur'an and science-article, was that the article on Wikipedia about the Flat Earth and the Myth of the Flat Earth speak for themselves. And my edits linked to the last one. I do believe that a wikipedia-article is a valid source. Do you agree on that? Jeff5102 ( talk) 08:21, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
I'd appreciate an answer to the question asked. Please. Jaakobou Chalk Talk 09:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
According to the history of the Iran-Iraq War article, you are a significant contributor to it. Therefore, I was wondering if you would like to get involved in a discussion I have started concerning a proposal to trim some sections, and move some text back into the article. The discussion can be found here: [5]. Thank you very much if you do get involved. Cheers for reading. Terrakyte ( talk) 22:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Why did you remove that link? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.237.204.190 ( talk) 23:48, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi! Would it be convenient for you to go to central Amman? If so, would you mind photographing the headquarters of Royal Jordanian Airlines? This airline needs a photo of its headquarters in its article. Thank you! WhisperToMe ( talk) 21:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello I admire your views on Israel and Palestine. Since you seem to be a good wiki user, I would like you to take a look at the article Battle of Bassorah and attempt to either neautralize it, or delete it.
As for the Quran and science - Today, some modern Muslim commentators have decided that, since the Qur’an makes no mention of the evolution of one species to another kind of species, the Darwinian theory of evolution is contrary to the teachings of the Qur’an. (However there is no basis for this belief in the Quran)
The sentence in parenthesis is valid.
Please voice your objection to the sentences that follow after that. If it was because it's not a minor edit, I apologize, it is a habit of mine to do that.-- 71.102.116.218 ( talk) 00:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to notify you of the response to both of your AIV reports.
Velanthis ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) For continuously vandalizing Qur'an and science, and refusing to use the talk page or edit summaries. Imad marie ( talk) 13:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
71.102.116.218 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) This is the IP of User:Velanthis. Imad marie ( talk) 13:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
I removed your reports because there is a constant backlog at AIV, and we need to reduce clutter. Thanks, ceran thor 14:41, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
The point was that this was not vandalism, but an argument over the content of the article. If someone reverts 4 times they have broken the WP:3RR rule. So they can be warned about that and then blocked. But the same can apply to those who are battling against the editor. You can also try sending a email, or seeing if the person has a real life contact somewhere else. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 21:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Whether you believe in evolution or not is none of my business. Please do not undo my edits senselessly to further whatever personal beliefs you have. If you object to it, do clearly explain and provide an alternative. My edits falls completely within Wikipedia grounds.
If what you want is for me to post my reasoning on Wikipedia than I will do that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Velanthis ( talk • contribs) 01:08, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, can you add your vote for Jerusalem as the capital of Palestine Here, Thanks. Ahmad2099 ( talk) 03:40, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
I saw from here that it's been two years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 03:11, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Since you added yourself as a lighty involved party, can you also sign up below that, indicating that you agree to mediation? Thanks. Tiamut talk 09:14, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
You might be intersted in participating in the article Genocide of Ottoman Turks and Muslims Hittit ( talk) 13:40, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:First intifada.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
The user who nominated this file for deletion did not notify you, so I thought Id help him do the right thing. nableezy - 15:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Young.king.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 05:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
This research project (which I am part of) is looking for participants for a workshop in Amman in April. The workshop is about representation of and by the Middle East and North Africa, in various language Wikipedias, and looking at barriers to contribution and ways to overcome them
In particular we are interested in those who edit from or about the Middle East, either extensively, or who have been discouraged from editing more due to on-wiki issues.
Full details at http://www.zerogeography.net/2012/02/open-invitation-to-workshop-in-amman.html.
All the best,
Rich
Farmbrough, 02:26, 24 February 2012 (UTC).
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reactions to the September 11 attacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the September 11 attacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Obi-Wan Kenobi ( talk) may the force be with you 21:17, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Dear imad. I noted your recent edit on the Al-Husayni page. I and a few others hope presently to revise it thoroughly, since the information is poorly organised, often does not reflect the texts cited, and highly, confusedly POV. I have edited the large section drawn from Schwanitz, for that writer knowingly made light of and mocked the words in Husayni's own diary. It would indeed help if, over the next several months, you could keep your eye out, or consult a library in Amman (?) for the Arabic original of the source Schwanitz quotes, namely Abd al-Karim al-Umar (ed.), Memoirs of the Grand Mufti, Damascus in 1999 and check esp. p.126, for the conversation with Himmler. I am sure, from memory, that after citing Himmler, Al-Husayni does express surprise (perhaps he himself took this as just a German kind of political rhetorical overstatement he was accustomed to). Best regards Nishidani ( talk) 12:49, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
'Our fundamental condition for cooperating with Germany was a free hand to eradicate every last Jew from Palestine and the Arab world. I asked Hitler for an explicit undertaking to allow us to solve the Jewish problem in a manner befitting our national and racial aspirations and according to the scientific methods innovated by Germany in the handling of its Jews. The answer I got was: 'The Jews are yours.'
Dear Imad marie,
I appreciate your interest in my user page, but I must insist that you refrain from editing it. I reverted all three of your edits to my user page. I do not edit your user page because I respect your right to put whatever you want on your own user page. I expect the same kind of respect in return. If you have a problem with something on my user page, I am open to suggestions on how to improve it. If I agree with those suggestions, then I myself will edit my user page accordingly. Thank you for understanding. --
GHcool (
talk) 16:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. Please be careful about comments such as the one you made at this link. First of all, Ncmvocalist and I were trying to mediate with GHcool, and your inserting yourself into the conversation at that time was unhelpful. WQA has no binding authority, but we are usually pretty good at getting people to agree to a compromise when such compromise is possible. Insulting the other editor while we are trying to negotiate with him is not going to help achieve that goal.
In addition, saying that "Wikipedia would be better off" without an editor could be construed as a direct personal attack. Whatever GHcool has or hasn't done, this does not excuse negative behavior on the part of other editors. Please be more careful about this in the future. Thanks! -- Jaysweet ( talk) 17:59, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
For info. Jaakobou now seems to have come round to the idea of merging, but not quite in the same way. I have posted a note on his talk page about it. Since he'll accuse me of being uncivil anyway, I may as well come straight out and say that I think it's pretty shameless on his part. -- Nickhh ( talk) 12:44, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
You've been noted to not remove the link to the main "Celebrations" article and yet you continue to remove it "per consensus"?!
[1],
[2] I request that you desist from behaving in a disruptive manner and follow proper procedures rather than undermine the policies by playing
revert games.
With respect,
Jaakobou
Chalk Talk 10:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
You've removed a cartoon claiming "per this PMW is not RS" [3] while that link shows nothing to substantiate your claim. Giving out incorrect, and possibly misleading edit summaries is a violation of wikipedia policies and I request that you do not repeat such an edit without achieving a proper consensus. Jaakobou Chalk Talk 10:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC) adding repeat reference, "No, see talk" [4] 16:59, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Good call. :) Kyaa the Catlord ( talk) 07:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, you've been mentioned in a posting at this website. ( permanent link) Let me know if you experience any problems regarding this. Cheers. lifebaka ++ 20:54, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi Imad-Marie. The reason that I did not put a source for my edits in the Qur'an and science-article, was that the article on Wikipedia about the Flat Earth and the Myth of the Flat Earth speak for themselves. And my edits linked to the last one. I do believe that a wikipedia-article is a valid source. Do you agree on that? Jeff5102 ( talk) 08:21, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
I'd appreciate an answer to the question asked. Please. Jaakobou Chalk Talk 09:47, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
According to the history of the Iran-Iraq War article, you are a significant contributor to it. Therefore, I was wondering if you would like to get involved in a discussion I have started concerning a proposal to trim some sections, and move some text back into the article. The discussion can be found here: [5]. Thank you very much if you do get involved. Cheers for reading. Terrakyte ( talk) 22:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Why did you remove that link? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.237.204.190 ( talk) 23:48, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi! Would it be convenient for you to go to central Amman? If so, would you mind photographing the headquarters of Royal Jordanian Airlines? This airline needs a photo of its headquarters in its article. Thank you! WhisperToMe ( talk) 21:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello I admire your views on Israel and Palestine. Since you seem to be a good wiki user, I would like you to take a look at the article Battle of Bassorah and attempt to either neautralize it, or delete it.
As for the Quran and science - Today, some modern Muslim commentators have decided that, since the Qur’an makes no mention of the evolution of one species to another kind of species, the Darwinian theory of evolution is contrary to the teachings of the Qur’an. (However there is no basis for this belief in the Quran)
The sentence in parenthesis is valid.
Please voice your objection to the sentences that follow after that. If it was because it's not a minor edit, I apologize, it is a habit of mine to do that.-- 71.102.116.218 ( talk) 00:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to notify you of the response to both of your AIV reports.
Velanthis ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) For continuously vandalizing Qur'an and science, and refusing to use the talk page or edit summaries. Imad marie ( talk) 13:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
71.102.116.218 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) This is the IP of User:Velanthis. Imad marie ( talk) 13:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
I removed your reports because there is a constant backlog at AIV, and we need to reduce clutter. Thanks, ceran thor 14:41, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
The point was that this was not vandalism, but an argument over the content of the article. If someone reverts 4 times they have broken the WP:3RR rule. So they can be warned about that and then blocked. But the same can apply to those who are battling against the editor. You can also try sending a email, or seeing if the person has a real life contact somewhere else. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 21:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Whether you believe in evolution or not is none of my business. Please do not undo my edits senselessly to further whatever personal beliefs you have. If you object to it, do clearly explain and provide an alternative. My edits falls completely within Wikipedia grounds.
If what you want is for me to post my reasoning on Wikipedia than I will do that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Velanthis ( talk • contribs) 01:08, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, can you add your vote for Jerusalem as the capital of Palestine Here, Thanks. Ahmad2099 ( talk) 03:40, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
I saw from here that it's been two years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 03:11, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Since you added yourself as a lighty involved party, can you also sign up below that, indicating that you agree to mediation? Thanks. Tiamut talk 09:14, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
You might be intersted in participating in the article Genocide of Ottoman Turks and Muslims Hittit ( talk) 13:40, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:First intifada.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
The user who nominated this file for deletion did not notify you, so I thought Id help him do the right thing. nableezy - 15:11, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Young.king.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 05:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
This research project (which I am part of) is looking for participants for a workshop in Amman in April. The workshop is about representation of and by the Middle East and North Africa, in various language Wikipedias, and looking at barriers to contribution and ways to overcome them
In particular we are interested in those who edit from or about the Middle East, either extensively, or who have been discouraged from editing more due to on-wiki issues.
Full details at http://www.zerogeography.net/2012/02/open-invitation-to-workshop-in-amman.html.
All the best,
Rich
Farmbrough, 02:26, 24 February 2012 (UTC).
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reactions to the September 11 attacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to the September 11 attacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Obi-Wan Kenobi ( talk) may the force be with you 21:17, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)