I believe User:Brighter Green and User:Carroll Gardens to be the same editor. When User:Brighter Green had edits deleted from Factory farming (see revision history), because of a conflict of interest — the citations were to his own website — these edits, still with links to www.brightergreen.org, were re-inserted the next day by User:Carroll Gardens, an account not registered until after the conflit-of-interest edits were deleted.

Since editing in this manner with two accounts would not seem to satisfy WP:SOCK#LEGIT, would you please CheckUser User:Brighter Green and User:Carroll Gardens? Thanks a million! — Spike Toronto 06:50, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Special:Log&user=Brighter+Green ;-). The first account was usernameblocked, and the template for that suggests that they create a new account. So I don't think there's any problem there. And yes, I've been busy. I took a winter class, so that I don't have to attend an entire extra semester to take one gen-ed... Anyways, taking a 15-week course in three weeks is not a joke :-/ J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 03:26, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Holy studying Batman! Talk about a telescoped course! When I was at uni, back when the dinosaurs roamed the earth, we used to have a period between the winter and summer term that was called intersession and it offered accelerated courses.

As for those two accounts, I feel rather foolish. Of course I should have checked the logs. I knew the account had a conflict of interest username. Therefore, if I had looked at his talk page, I would have seen the coi username notification from User:Gyrofrog, and the subsequent username block from User:Dank. I should have done some more research first. That’s not like me.

Thanks and good luck with the studying! — Spike Toronto 06:24, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi, J. :) Haven't spoken to you for a while; hope things are well in your part of the Wiki world. I'm popping by in the hopes that you can help answer this question. Can you? Would you mind? If you can't/absolutely refuse to, please just let me know and I'll ask somebody else. :D -- Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:57, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! :D -- Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 22:07, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 19:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

I started drafting an article on BGO Records ( User:Arjayay/BGO Records) before discovering you had deleted a previous article.
As I have no way of knowing if this is "similar to the previously deleted page", I am, as suggested, contacting the deleting administrator

00:12, 3 July 2009 J.delanoy (talk | contribs) deleted "BGO Records" ‎(Expired PROD, concern was: No assertion of notability. Has been tagged with ?UNIQd907b466c215836-nowiki-00000000-QINU? for 6 months. Google and [ http://news.go)

I cannot find any specific notability guidelines for record companies.
As listed in my draft, BGOs current artist roster includes over 300 artists who are notable enough to have their own WP article.
Searching WP for potential internal links gave over 150 matches (82 for BGO Records, 13 for Beat Goes On Records & 57 for BGO)

Could the article that was deleted be posted at the foot of my draft? I would also welcome any comments before I continue with this.
Arjayay ( talk) 18:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

With a proposed deletion (PROD), there's no issue with "recreating deleted material". Speed deletion criterion #G4 only applies when a page was deleted via a deletion discussion. I only deleted that page because no one had contested the proposed deletion within a few days (I think it was 5 days then, it's a week now iirc).

So yeah, if you want, you can just move your page over the top of that page. If you like, I can email you the content which the page had before, so you can see if you want to incorporate some of it into your new article. If you do, please let me know so that I can restore the deleted history of the page, to properly attribute the original authors. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Sorry to be so slow in replying, although I added this page to my watchlist, I missed your reply.
Not knowing what was on the original page, could you to e-mail it to me please, via the "E-mail this user" link on my talkpage.
Thanks Arjayay ( talk) 16:18, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

You've got mail :-) J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks - Nothing in that I didn't know. Arjayay ( talk) 17:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Hey J.! As he who knows everything, I wonder if you could help me with a problem I am having with my SUL Account? When I log in here at the English Wikipedia, if I then go to other language Wikipedias, I am logged in. Good so far. But, when I go over to any of the other Wikimedia projects (e.g., Meta, Wiktionary, Commons, etc.), I am rarely if ever logged in and have to do it manually. These are my SUL details. Sometimes, over at the side, there is a warning at s4, whatever that means. Any ideas? Can I fix this? Thanks! — Spike Toronto 18:53, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

( talk page stalker) Ignore the s4 warning, that's just technical details for those who use the toolserver; I would guess it has to do with the massive toolserver data loss that happened recently. Regardless it has nothing to do with your problem. Have you cleared your cookies? The SUL login cookie is a little different from the local one, and sulutil does say you have successfully merged the accounts (you can always double-check this by going to Special:MergeAccount). Try clearing your cookies and then logging in. It may also have to do with the security level of your browser. What browser do you use? -- Shirik ( Questions or Comments?) 18:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer Shirik! I am using Internet Explorer (IE). Also, I did clear my cookies last week when the English Wikipedia kept logging me out seconds after I had logged in. It may be possible that I missed some of the cookies. Also, a few of the Wikimedia cookies that I tried to delete, for whatever reason, Windows would not let me delete them … a dialogue box kept popping up telling me that the cookie could not be deleted … may have been because I had not shut all IE windows … Thanks! — Spike Toronto 19:24, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

P.S.  The thing I’ve the most difficulty grasping is why it has no problem logging me into the other language Wikipedias, but has problems logging me into the non-Wikipedia Wikimedia projects. — Spike Toronto 02:12, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

UPDATE:  Hey Shirik (and J.!). I just deleted each and every cookie in my temporary internet files directory with the letters wiki in it. Then, I rebooted my computer and logged back into Wikipedia. The single, unified login still logs me into the English Wikipedia (of course! ) and any of the other-language Wikipedias that I surf over to (e.g., Spanish, Italian, French, Portuguese, etc.).

However, it still does not log me into any non-Wikipedia Wikimedia projects (e.g., Commons, Meta, Wiktionary, etc.), even though these are specified in my detailed SUL listing. As odd as this question is going to sound, is it possible that the SUL cookie does not have the letters wiki in it, and, therefore, did not get deleted? Any other suggestions? Do you think that this is something that I should take to WP:VPT or some other place here at Wikipedia? (I’m sure J. wishes I would sod off from his page! ) Thanks for all your help! — Spike Toronto 08:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

( talk page stalker) Don't worry about the browser or anything else, I have the exact same problem (s4 issue and login issue), and I use a different OS and a different browser. It's most likely a technical problem on the side of Wikimedia and should be (if not already) resolved soon. Well, I hope so! [CharlieEchoTango] 08:40, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

With all due respect, what you are saying makes little sense. First off, all this means is that you are encountering the same problem, not that it is a problem on Wikimedia's side. Furthermore, the "s4 issue" is not an issue at all, and is in no way related to your account or his or anyone's. It is a status report on the replication lag of the toolserver, and nothing more. It is entirely unrelated to this issue. Using the ostrich algorithm is not going to get the problem solved. -- Shirik ( Questions or Comments?) 08:46, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Sorry then, if I'm misleading SpikeToronto. I just thought the problem was the site, since my browser accepts third-party cookies and I had the exact same problem as he does. But again, I really should stay away from anything technical :P. Cheers - [CharlieEchoTango] 08:56, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

( talk page stalker) ( edit conflict) OK it sounds like your cookie is being blocked, and there are some good reasons for this. It may appear to be a third-party cookie (one that is supplied by an outside site) because the domains don't match. These are often blocked by default because it is often a privacy violation. You have two possible solutions. The first, you may wish to try the secure server. Because it's always "secure.wikimedia.org" it should allow the cookie as a first-party cookie. Alternatively, you might try adding wikimedia.org and wikipedia.org to the "trusted zone" in Internet Explorer (this has its own consequences, but it is an option). There are alternative options too, but they are a little harder to describe briefly. I would try the secure server option first just to make sure we have a bead on what is causing it. -- Shirik ( Questions or Comments?) 08:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

A note, interwiki links do not work across the secure server as far as I am aware, so here is a link to the main page of commons on the secure server. If you log in on the secure server here then click this link and you stay logged in, that would seem to indicate the problem is that your browser is denying third-party cookies. It works for me currently. (I do not, and cannot currently, use the non-secure login to verify that choice.) -- Shirik ( Questions or Comments?) 08:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Well, I logged on using the secure server. Then I came back to this page and clicked on the link provided. Guess what? I was logged in at Commons! The only problem with the secure server, though, is that Internet Explorer 8 constantly asks me, Do you want to view only the webpage content that was delivered securely? I think it’s because some of the images are not considered secure … but I’m not really sure.

So, the problem, I guess, is either security level or third-party cookies. Yet, there were a lot of Wikimedia cookies that I deleted; there was one for each Wikimedia project. So, it must have accepted them at one time or other.

One comment regarding trusted sites. My browser, each and every time I surf over to a trusted site, pops up a dialogue box asking if I’m sure I want to go there. This boggles my mind since the obvious answer would be, Well, it is a trusted site, n’est-ce pas?

I hope this test unlocks the mystery for you Shirik. You’re being a great help! Thanks! — Spike Toronto 09:10, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

P.S.  Still does not work if I log in on the non-secure site (i.e., en.wikipedia.org. — Spike Toronto 09:13, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

UPDATE:  On a hunch, I tried logging in on the regular, non-secure Wikipedia using a different computer that is running Internet Explorer 6, and the same thing happens: get logged into all the other-language Wikipedias and none of the non-Wikipedia Wikimedia projects. Just thought I’d give you one more piece of info. Thanks! — Spike Toronto 09:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

My guess is that the root cause of this lies in how modern browsers handle security. Different projects are at different sites, so the browser denies access to the session cookie held by the other sites. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:05, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

guess I should pay attention :P I have no idea why it does that, but it does the same for me (running FF 4.0b9). J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

See, now that surprises me because I thought that FireFox was the miracle browser. Perhaps the problem lies with the Wikimedia end of things? Thanks! — Spike Toronto 01:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Eureka! It’s fixed! I added the following to my trusted sites:

• http://*.mediawiki.org
• https://*.mediawiki.org
• http://*.wikipedia.org
• https://*.wikipedia.org
• http://*.wikimedia.org
• https://*.wikimedia.org
• http://*.wikibooks.org
• https://*.wikibooks.org
• http://*.wikinews.org
• https://*.wikinews.org
• http://*.wikiquote.org
• https://*.wikiquote.org
• http://*.wikisource.org
• https://*.wikisource.org
• http://*.wikiversity.org
• https://*.wikiversity.org
• http://*.wiktionary.org
• https://*.wiktionary.org

After entering these into trusted sites, I disabled Display Mixed Content to stop that infernal pop-up. Then, I logged off WP, exited IE, cleared out the IE temporary files with a quick delete from inside Internet Options, re-launched IE, logged back into WP, and discovered that it worked. Every other-language Wikipedia was logged in (thanks to *.wikipedia.org), and all the various non-Wikipedia Wikimedia projects were also logged in (e.g., Wiktionary, Commons, Meta, etc.) thanks to the other strings (e.g., *.wikimedia.org, *.wiktionary.org, etc.).

Thanks Kingpin, Shirik, CharlieEchoTango, and J. for all your help!! Is there some FAQ or HELP page that this solution can be added to for other Wikipedians who may be having the same problem? Thanks again!! — Spike Toronto 07:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:FAQ/Technical would probably be the place.  Chzz   ►  10:46, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

What about at Help:Logging in or m:Help:Unified login? Thanks! — Spike Toronto 23:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi! Since you've been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, I wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If that sounds like you and you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors during the current term, which started in January and goes through early May. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.-- Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation ( talk) 20:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Dear J.delanoy, Congratulations! As for being a great and helpful contributor to this project, you have been identified as a WikiHero. Thanks alot for all your good and helpful work to this project. Your username has appeared on this list Good luck and happy editing. Lord Porchcrop POWER 03:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

For a userbox, you can use {{ User:Porchcrop/Identified WikiHero}}. Lord Porchcrop ^POWER 03:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi! I found this at the Indonesian Wikipedia: id:Wikipedia:Surat pernyataan permintaan penghapusan gambar-gambar penghinaan terhadap Nabi Muhammad saw.. I'm not exactly sure what it is (I don't know Indonesian, so I am not sure if this is a userbox or an essay or something) - But it seems like Si Gam Aceh is editing again. Is his block expired? WhisperToMe ( talk) 01:39, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Well, a block on the English Wikipedia does not extend to other projects. So even if he is blocked here, it is perfectly possible for him to edit any other project he chooses. If a user account vandalizes many projects, it may be globally locked from MetaWiki by a steward. Be aware, though, that this is not usually done unless it becomes clear that local blocks are ineffective at stopping a user from disrupting many, many projects. Therefore, it is very rare for accounts to be locked for anything other than widespread crude vandalism. (or oddities like offensive usernames) J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 03:20, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

He had a meta-level block from all Wikimedia projects. See meta:Steward_requests/Global/2010-08#Global_lock_for_Si_Gam_Ac.C3.A8h WhisperToMe ( talk) 03:36, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

The account that was locked is Si Gam Acèh. Note the diacritic. I believe the account that created that petition is Si Gam Aceh, which does not have the diacritic. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:13, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

I've commented on meta about this, fyi. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:24, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

I see. Thank you for taking a look at the issue :) WhisperToMe ( talk) 18:15, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 05:11, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:48, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Please take a look at this project page and see if you can be a mentor to one of the many Areas of Study. If you can, please put your name in the "Online Mentor" area of the Area of Study of your choice and then contact the students you will be working with. As the Coordinating Online Ambassador for this project, please let me know if I can be of assistance. Take Care... Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi JD, I'm looking for some advice from you as a steward. Credo Reference has donated another 400 reference accounts to Wikipedians, and we're currently drawing up a page for people to apply for them; the list will open next week some time, hopefully. See WP:CREDO. I know where to let people know about this on the English WP, but I'm less sure of where to post on Meta and elsewhere to make sure it reaches people on the other language Wikipedias. Can you advise where I can find links to relevant pages, so that editors on non-English Wikipedias don't feel left out of this? SlimVirgin ^{TALK| CONTRIBS} 22:33, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Hmm. I'm not entirely sure. I would probably say the m:Wikimedia_Forum or m:Meta:Babel. The former seems marginally more "correct", but it probably wouldn't hurt to post in both places. (sorry for the late response, been crazy busy with school - on break this next week finally). J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:44, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

That's helpful, many thanks. SlimVirgin ^{TALK| CONTRIBS} 04:51, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me. cooldenny ( talk) 01:19, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

This message is being sent to inform you of a Wikipedia picnic that is being held in your area next Saturday, June 25. From 1 to 8 PM or any time in between, join your fellow volunteers for a get together at Norman's Landscape ( directions) in Manhattan's Central Park.

Take along your friends ( newbies permitted), your family and other free culture enthusiasts! You may also want to pack a blanket, some water or perhaps even a frisbee.

If you can, share what you're bringing at the discussion page.

Also, please remember that this is the picnic that anyone can edit so bring enough food to share!

Hi, J.delanoy, I was just wondering why you did this. If in your opinion that text shouldn't be there, why not just delete it completely? Lotje ツ ( talk) 09:29, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

I don't like deleting talk pages that have other stuff on them.... I don't really remember why specifically I didn't delete that page. Last month has been pretty crazy, sorry. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:39, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello J.delanoy, NHRHS2010 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{ subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I like your message that starts with something like "Beware that I am a Checkuser." I do recall nominating you to be an administrator but hardly anyone supported and it failed right away. But after another attempt, not only I notice it passed, I see you are a Checkuser and a Steward! That's a huge step, I still feel good about attempting to get you to be an admin even if my nomination didn't work. NHRHS2010 the student pilot ✈ 17:29, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

heh, thanks. I'm not as active here as I was back then. Real life is kind of insane now. I might be a bit more active in a few months, but I don't think that I will be as active as I was back in 2008 and 2009. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:35, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Same here, you won't find me as active compared with in 2007-08. And I gotta agree that real life can be intense, especially after high school. NHRHS2010 the student pilot ✈ 16:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Dear J.delanoy ,I read your msg few times today .There is mistake: Have no exchanges with user Nasreddin. Regards Macedon-40 ( talk) 16:12, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Due to your massive activity on the English Wikipedia, I actually had to re-write a substantial amount of my analysis code to deal with the inordinate amount of edits you perform. I now refer to this method as the "J.delanoy approximation". I thought you'd enjoy knowing that. :D -- EpochFail( talk| work) 23:17, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Ha, thanks! Also, sorry (I think) :P

I was pretty active for a while. Not so much now (real life is too crazy). J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 05:06, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Dear J.delanoy. I am really surprised to hear that I could be editing from someone else's account. [3] This is simply impossible technically. I am the only account for my edits. Some editors may develop close online camaraderie on certain pages of their mutual interest but that is where the issue stops. Your use of wikistalk is controversial. I added my name next to names of users who opposed my edits and wikistalk found very close similarity. There were several attempts to file bogus SPIs but all of them failed. Vandorenfm ( talk) 02:57, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

I did not use Wikistalk. I used Special:CheckUser. CheckUser is a tool that allows a few users to see Wikipedia's server logs. Among other things, I can see what IP addresses were used by various accounts, and conversely, what accounts have edited from a particular IP address. This is completely different than Wikistalk, and is typically much less likely to produce false positives. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 22:47, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

I edit from a metropolitan area, which is one of the largest in the world, with millions of users relying on one provider. This provider has thousands of migrating IPs. I think this is a coincidence which drew attention because a few editors gravitate to the same articles and topics. But this is natural. If someone is interested in the topic of Nagorno-Karabakh, he/she is naturally involved in the articles on Shusha, Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, Nagorno-Karabakh War, Caucasian Albania because all of them are key sub-topics for Nagorno-Karabakh. Please note that User:Hetoum I, User:Bars77 or User:Gorzaim were never involved in two large articles that I authored and edited almost alone - Nor Varagavank and Hovhannes Imastaser. Vandorenfm ( talk) 02:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Delanoy, can you also look at these suspicious sockpuppets: [4]? Dighapet ( talk) 13:46, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

You sent me a message saying I altered the page Western Cordilla or something like that. I never edited that page...

Check my contribution history, I never had been on that page lest edit it so I think you made a mistake. I did not vandalize that page. Dartpaw86 ( talk) 02:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Dartpaw86

I must have sent a message to an IP address that later got rotated to you by your internet provider. Don't worry about it, that sort of thing will happen from time to time. You will not have someone else's actions held against you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:30, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you :D Dartpaw86 ( talk) 10:55, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Dartpaw86

Here another possible sock of Brunodam/Ragusino's, with my best regards :D -- Vituzzu ( talk) 21:23, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

...and Illahnou could be Mmbmmmbm. -- Vituzzu ( talk) 21:28, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Illahnou ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) is Amintib ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) (which is globally locked). They are also the same person as Yamsahh ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki), who is blocked locally. I don't know who the ultimate master is. Illahnou is now blocked indefinitely.

I couldn't find anything useful about the accounts you mentioned at 21:23. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 02:52, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

But you may find something about him ;)

-- Vituzzu ( talk) 19:50, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Ranges are incredibly broad. The signal to noise ration is too low, sorry. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 00:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

As of my knowledge i have seen wiki as neutral n doesn't hurt any religion then why Islam. Dont u know that der is no pic n sketches of P.B.U.H Muhammad in Islam. Then why r u using the following images http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Maome.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mohammed_kaaba_1315.jpg

on the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad

there is so much anger abt it in Muslim world. As i like wiki i want this anger to end. To see the anger see here. http://www.causes.com/causes/57379-removal-of-the-pics-of-prophet-muhammad-pbuh-from-wikipedia/

I hope n want to remove these pics asap.

Thankx, Ismail — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismailfazal ( talk • contribs) 18:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not written to appease concerned parents or Shi'a Muslims. If you want a Wikipedia written in accordance with Islamic religious laws, try the Arabic Wikipedia. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components: V S M} 18:19, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

( edit conflict)( talk page stalker) Please read: Wikipedia is not censored and the FAQ on Muhammad about why the pictures will not be removed. Jarkeld.alt ( Talk) 18:20, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

You are invited to Wikipedia:The Musical in NYC, an editathon, Wikipedia meet-up and lectures that will be held on Saturday, October 22, 2011, at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts (at Lincoln Center), as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events being held across the USA.

All are welcome, sign up on the wiki and here!-- Pharos ( talk) 04:25, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello, J.delanoy. You have new messages at Calabe1992's talk page.
Message added 05:08, 3 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Calabe 1992 05:08, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

I see you're a steward, so maybe you can help. Can you read the message I left at User:OsamaK and the linked message there (in English) that I left at ar.wiki? An ar.wiki user uploaded a bunch of copyvios to commons, which were deleted there. (The user participated in the deletion discussion.) Immediately after the deletion at commons, the user reuploaded the copyvios to ar.wiki, where they are now in use. Thanks for your help, and let me know if this isn't something stewards do (I don't understand the role terribly well). Calliopejen1 ( talk) 18:48, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Sheridan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. David in DC ( talk) 20:26, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Delanoy, hi. Would it be possible for you to restore the original images which mistakenly got deleted due to this sock's uploads? I'm sick to the stomach from its mails and want this to end. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:06, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

So, that is it? "I think this should be handled with care." and then denied and closed? Well, Strongone11 ( talk · contribs) came back and did it again. I guess I'll let the POV/COI vandal win. Best O Fortuna ( talk) 04:35, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

I have no idea what you are talking about. I left a comment on the request, but I did not decline it or accept it, so it shouldn't have been archived. I've been away for a while, and the old bot would read the template to see if it had been declined/accepted, and it wouldn't archive requests with {{ RFPP|n}}. Apparently, the new one doesn't do that. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:41, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

It was moved here by Logan ( talk · contribs). Is Logan a bot? > Best O Fortuna ( talk) 05:51, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Oh... no... he's not... There used to be a bot. I have no idea what is going on. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 05:52, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Please advise. Do I revert Logan? Do I revert Strongone11? Both? Buy a ticket on the Titanic? > Best O Fortuna ( talk) 06:46, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi there, and thanks for notifying me about this discussion. It appears that the script that I (and many other people) use to clean up RFPP requests does not check for {{ RFPP|n}} when moving or archiving requests, from a quick look at the code. I will notify Rami R, the creator of this script, of this discussion so that he can see if there is an issue and possibly fix it. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 16:15, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. So, can one of you guys semi-protect the article from this guy? > Best O Fortuna ( talk) 01:09, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello Best O Fortuna. I've warned Strongone11 for 3RR. The people who are blanking sections are taking out 'Lawsuits' and 'Personal life'. I think consensus is needed on whether these sections belong in the article. The case for including 'Lawsuits' seems weaker; 'Personal Life' seems adequately sourced but is kind of gossipy. Whether the treatments she recommends are medically sound is a topic of interest but would need careful handling. I notice that the sources include TMZ, MomLogic.com and Parade Magazine -- probably not ideal. Those interested in this matter should start a thread on the article talk page and try to reach agreement. If not enough participants can be found, make a request at WP:BLP/N. EdJohnston ( talk) 03:46, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

I used to be the user User talk:Ciaran306, whom you probably don't remember. I apologise for the way I acted in response to the block, and I don't hold any hard feelings. Sincerely, He's Gone Mental 15:58, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Why was my upload of File:24-redemption-poster.jpg deleted? I was using it on the 24: Redemption page. I'm trying to upload a new version from http://www.movieposterdb.com/poster/525a6334, but it won't let me do it because it was a duplicate of the one you deleted. What gives? As you can see by the history on the 24: Redemption page, It was indeed in use. :/ Andrzejbanas ( talk) 02:51, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

It was done at my request, because I switched it to the DVD cover (as per the discussion we had on my talk page) but as we've further discussed, that's now moot. It's now located at File:24 Redemption film poster.jpg. Regards, Steven Zhang ^{Join the DR army!} 04:43, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Could you have a look at the unblock request at User talk:ArishiaNishi? Without access to the checkuser information it's impossible to assess it. Thanks. JamesBWatson ( talk) 20:24, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

 Done. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 03:43, 13 December 2011‎

Hi can you block the email of this sock He is constantly pinging me — Commander _{(Ping me)} 17:52, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Someone else already got it. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Rlevse. Someone's suggesting that the username Rlevse be registered (to prevent the user talk page from showing up as belonging to a nonexistent user) and immediately indefinitely blocked, and another person replied that it would potentially require the intervention of a steward, due to SUL matters. Could you please look into doing this? Thanks! Nyttend ( talk) 13:28, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

I don't think that's really necessary. If creating the account would require steward/bureaucrat intervention, there is not much risk of someone creating the account in order to impersonate Rlevse. On the other hand, the page isn't really doing anything by existing, and to be honest, a quick look at the page logs for User:Rlevse indicates clearly that the account's owner exercised his/her Right To Vanish. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:21, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Do not care what is your nationality and what is your knowledge about Macedonia. But if you want to be correct and neutral: 1. Neutral approach you can found in Macedonia disambiguation on other languages , f.e. in Portuguese 2. There is no necessity to place map in disambiguation, but if it is so important for you, the map must be neutral. You say “ revert deeper - there is nothing wrong with the map” Are sure ? There is marked only one part of disambiguation . Why ? 2.1 May be this part was a core of Ancient Macedonia  ? No – the core was mainly in Macedonia (Greece). Futhermore, from the point of view of ancient geography, name of marked part is Peonia. 2.2 May be this part was the core of Ottoman Macedonia before 1912 ? No- the core was again Macedonia (Greece) with main center Thessaloniki. 2.3. May be marked part is the biggest part of former ottoman Macedonia ? No- the biggest part again is Macedonia (Greece),about 60% of former ottoman province.

This map is silly irredentist game, trying to proof that the new slavic-albanian state is core of Macedonia and there are other parts under control of neighbors.. This have nothing to do with real geography and history of region. If you want to participate in this silly game, this is your right. But do not say that there is nothing wrong. It is clear violation of neutrality. Macedon-40 ( talk) 13:04, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

In the discussion that led to the creation of WP:MOSMAC (the style guide for naming conventions related to the term "Macedonia"), it was decided that for the purposes of this encyclopedia, there may practically be some confusion with the modern Greek province or the ancient kingdom, so the article about the modern nation-state was placed at Republic of Macedonia, and the page " Macedonia" was made into a disambiguation page, listing possible meanings of the word. The modern nation-state self-styled in its constitution as "Republic of Macedonia" is overwhelmingly referred to in the English language as simply "Macedonia". Furthermore, the word "Macedonia" is nearly always used in the English language to refer to the modern nation-state. Use of either the nation-state's provisional United Nations designation "The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", the acronym "FYROM", or other similar terms such as "Macedonia (FYROM)" are confined in English to maps, charts, or other such tools. They are basically never used in English prose.

Therefore, in order to represent the widest range of standard English usage, it was decided that the modern nation-state would be referred to on the English Wikipedia as either "Republic of Macedonia" or simply "Macedonia". Given that there has never been any other entity called "Republic of Macedonia" by anyone, it was decided that this term would be sufficient for resolving possible confusion: for example, " History of Macedonia" is a disambiguation page, with links to Macedonia (region)#History, History of modern Macedonia (Greece), and History of the Republic of Macedonia. Since the term "Republic of Macedonia" is simple, clear, and supported by common English usage, it was decided that other terms would not be used. The names used in the map simply reflect this, for consistency's sake.

Wikipedia is not a political tool. The site's style is designed to follow common English usage. There is no practical reason to use any of the longer designations for the nation-state, as the continued use of this term at all anywhere in the world is absolutely and completely contingent on the steadfast refusal of the Greek government to move one centimeter in its position. The United Nations admitted Macedonia to its body using a provisional designation based solely on the fact that Greece raised extremely vocal objections to the republic's usage of the term "Republic of Macedonia". The newly independent nation-state acquiesced to the Greek demands at the timebecause it wished to join the international community as soon as possible. The only reason why any countries still refer to the country in diplomatic relations using the UN designation is because it is the UN designation, not because they support the Greek position.

This is not a question of neutrality, this is a question about whether the English Wikipedia is going to cave in to what is solely a Greek political concern, and one that is either totally ignored or openly opposed by literally every nation on the planet, and is basically ignored by all (and I mean ALL) English-language media. And please don't find a few articles that do use the Greek-supported term, because a few exceptions do not invalidate a practically universal condition. If my writing seems a bit harsh, it is because I have been dealing with this issue on and off for the past two and a half years, and I thoroughly SICK of the Greek position on the issue. In my own opinion, this is one of the single most stupid disputes in recent history. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:29, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

"Wikipedia is not a political tool” –but you are using Wiki as political tool.

And you are really “thoroughly SICK” as you even not try to understand what I say. Irrespectively of my personal position on this “stupid dispute” my demand is different. Once again. While somebody put the term "Republic of Macedonia" on the map, the term Macedonia to be placed on bigger part, on the map of Greece. Otherwise it is simply silly attempt, using Wiki as political tool, for Usurpation and Monopolisation of geographical and historical term. If you do not understand this – it is your problem. Macedon-40 ( talk) 08:32, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

You are invited to the National Archives ExtravaSCANza, taking place every day next week from January 4–7, Wednesday to Saturday, in College Park, Maryland (Washington, DC metro area). Come help me cap off my stint as Wikipedian in Residence at the National Archives with one last success! This will be a casual working event in which Wikipedians are getting together to scan interesting documents at the National Archives related to a different theme each day—currently: spaceflight, women's suffrage, Chile, and battleships—for use on Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons. The event is being held on multiple days, and in the evenings and weekend, so that as many locals and out-of-towners from nearby regions1 as possible can come. Please join us! Dominic· t 01:21, 30 December 2011 (UTC) 1 Wikipedians from DC, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Newark, New York City, and Pittsburgh have been invited.

Hi I came across your ' flickr request' subpage when googling how to ask someone to re-licence their photos on that site. Your little chart of successes actually got me to bang off a request.-- Brianann MacAmhlaidh ( talk) 08:53, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 04:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

		The Userpage Shield
		Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. SMS Talk 20:11, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 03:29, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

You might be interested in joining the Imposter Verification Team because of your contributions here

Whenaxis talk Join the Imposter Verification Team! 00:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Regarding Spirit In The Sky Paul ( talk · contribs), who I just had the deal with, I saw you tagged them as long-term abuse. Is this someone I'm not aware of? Calabe 1992 06:54, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

No, I misinterpreted what was going on. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 06:57, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

OK. They're walking on thin ice with personal attacks, so who knows if they'll come back. Calabe 1992 07:00, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

I haven't been active in the protection/blocking functions, so this isn't so much a challenge as it is a question. I saw the request for semi-protection at Counter-Strike. I see an IP has been attempting to add a link not in compliance with WP:EL. I do see a warning at the IP talk page, but only a single warning. I thought the usual sequence was a series of escalating warnings, with a final warning as the last step before blocking. I do know that the sequence can jump to a block without the interim or final warnings, but this doesn't meet what I thought were the usual exceptions. Your thoughts would be welcome. As an aside, I was in the middle of granting semi-protection, and not even sure I support my own decision, as I recently argued that when the problem comes from one editor, that editor should be addressed. However, given the repeated nature, and the need to revdel prior additions, and the lack of interim warnings, I thought Semi-protection would be the best course. Again, this isn't a big deal, but I'm interested in the thought process.'-- SPhilbrick (Talk) 18:40, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

I blocked him outright primarily because he was already blocked a few days ago on a different IP for doing the same exact thing. Normally I wouldn't have blocked when he had only one warning for something like that, but it was quite obvious that he knew that he was doing something that wasn't allowed (linking to illegal material), and he didn't stop. I blocked him because I am hoping that he will get the hint and quit it. The way I view it, if he does, then I have avoided locking down an entire page because of one person. If he doesn't, I can still lock the page if needed. RevDeleting is quite easy to do, and the slight extra effort is, in my opinion, worth it if it means that I don't have to protect the page. Still, I should note that I usually try to avoid protecting pages if I can do so. Most admins are much more likely than me to protect pages, and I don't think that what you did was a bad idea, I just personally dislike having to lock pages. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:59, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the answer, I missed that the editor had been previously blocked, so that puts a very different picture on it. Despite my decision to semi, I am reluctant to protect - in fact, I was in the middle of writing an explanation of why I was going to reject one request, when someone else protected, so I moved on :)-- SPhilbrick (Talk) 19:05, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

I just dropped you an email. PCHS-NJROTC ^(Messages) 00:49, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello there, I ask that you assess this situation as no other admins have taken the situation seriously & we could potentially lose one highly productive Wikipedian. Please take a look, Regards.★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 23:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

I think my IP address(dhcp range) changed with ATT's migration to U-Verse in my area. Please check when you have time to see if my block exemption is still necessary. Thanks. ArishiaNishi ( talk) 01:34, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

 Done, thanks! J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 03:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Dear J.delanoy,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar -- Jaobar ( talk) 07:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for keeping spammy links off Tamilnadu Common Entrance Test and others. Safety Cap ( talk) 17:37, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I was just wondering if you allow people to steal your photos. Right now at www.hockeybuzz.com the blogger has used your picture of the Stanley Cup. At least I think it's your photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.71.239.171 ( talk) 17:39, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Well, images hosted on Wikimedia Commons (which is where that image is hosted) have to be licensed in such a way that other people are free to use them or create derivative works of them. The copy of the image that I created was itself a derivative work of an image that someone else took. If someone else wants to use my derivative work, they have the right to do so, because of the way that I licensed the image. Ideally, they would have credited either me or the original image creator, but even though it appears that they did not (if that image even is mine, which I can't tell), it doesn't really matter to me. Thanks for letting me know, though. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:17, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

I thank you for your prompt vandalism reversals on my talk page about two hours ago. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 01:03, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome :) J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:04, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi J.delanoy, regarding the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ledenierhomme, User:Ledenierhomme is unlikely to stick to the subject in question, they continuously, and I belive purposefully, avoid certain questions/inquires. You may want to have a look at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/08 November 2011/Iraqi Turkmens in order to try and get a better idea of their characteristics... Turco85 ( Talk) 02:59, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I keep making a change to Tessa's page, Her album is called "Days Of," while her band is known as "The Week." My correction keeps getting reversed, always going back to the band being called "Days Of The Week." Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TroyB112 ( talk • contribs) 02:44, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, blocked him for the 3RR/PAs reported at ANEW before I saw your final warning. No objections if you want to extend or modify. Kuru (talk) 01:36, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

No, it's fine. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:37, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Further talk page abuse

This pretty much seals his fate on this site. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:38, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Wait, shouldn't he lose his talk page access too? Jasper Deng (talk) 03:52, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

I dislike removing talk page access at all. I especially dislike it before a user has been given a chance to appeal a block, or a modification of a block (if the modification makes the block more longer/more severe). J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 03:55, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Well, now they blew that chance three times. Jasper Deng (talk) 04:01, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

My edits to User talk:J.delanoy/Archive 11 were with respect to a personal name that is coming up on Google searches. User:Fred Bauder Talk 12:07, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Please recheck edits of Palooki ( talk · contribs) - he started adding refs after my warning. Thanks. Materialscientist ( talk) 23:03, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Well, the homosexuality part is off course a key, and I couldn't verify it well, thus asked - murky case. Cheers. Materialscientist ( talk) 23:30, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

	New England Wikimedia General Meeting
	The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future! Potential topics: What is a Wikimedia chapter and should we work towards one? Planning of regular Boston meetups (any other New England cities?) Planning for upcoming coordinated events ( Wikipedia Love Libraries, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiknic, etc.) Outreach to universities ( WikiProject Academical Village) and cultural institutions ( GLAM) Wikimania DC is this summer. Your ideas!
	Sunday, April 22 1:30 PM – 4:30 PM	Conference Room C06, Johnson Building, Boston Public Library—Central Library 700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England!

Message delivered by Dominic at 09:12, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

Hi. The Distribution America article has been deleted a couple of times in the past, and I'm contacting you as the most recent deleting administrator. Check "what links here" to Distribution America to see a bunch of red links I've created, simply by double-bracketing pre-existing references, to establish notability. This is a retailers' cooperative, and some of the members of the co-op have articles on Wikipedia. I could re-start the article from scratch, but I guess policy prefers restoring the old article and fixing it. I can edit to tone down or eliminate the blatant advertising the deleted version apparently had. Note that List of retailers' cooperatives#Hardware stores shows that this is the only major hardware co-op that doesn't have an article. Thanks, Wbm1058 ( talk) 15:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Hey :). You're being contacted because you are involved in the ACC process, or participated in the original discussion in '08 about the ConfirmAccount extension. This is a note to let you know that we are seeking opinions on switching this extension on, effectively making the ACC process via the Toolserver redundant. You can read all the details here; I would be very grateful if people would indicate how they feel about the idea :). Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 13:21, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi J Delanoy

I'm looking for your checkuser advice on this please.

I was trying to get other editors to help with the article Callum Stone because this user moved it from mainstream to a list article, I'm trying to improve it to get it back to mainstream. One of the editors I asked looked at this editors user page and found that it has been tagged as a possible sockpuppet of User:KirkleyHigh. Bit worried that the account was still editing so I looked on the SPI page for the user and can't find any report logged for User:WhatTheWorldNeedsNow, when I looked on the user talk page I also can't see anything mentioned about an SPI report there. I've looked at the edits, they are similar as I can see KirkleyHigh was blocked for uploading image violations and WhatTheWorldNeedsNow has received warnings for similar offences. I'm not too sure if I should open an SPI seeing as the user is already tagged as a possible sock, can you offer some advice please on what to do?-- 5 albert square ( talk) 11:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

I can't tell from CU if he's a sock or not. He has an incredibly dynamic IP. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 23:48, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Any suggestions?-- 5 albert square ( talk) 23:51, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Not really much I can think of. If he's changing information to be incorrect, it's probably him. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:57, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks-- 5 albert square ( talk) 21:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Wiki-Gangs of New York: April 21 at the New York Public Library

Join us for an an civic edit-a-thon, Wikipedia meet-up and instructional workshop that will be held this weekend on Saturday, April 21, at the New York Public Library Main Branch. Venue: Stephen A. Schwarzman Building ( NYPL Main Branch), Margaret Liebman Berger Forum (Room 227). Directions: Fifth Avenue at 42nd Street. Time: 11 a.m. - 5 p.m. (drop-ins welcome at any time) The event's goal will be to improve Wikipedia articles and content related to the neighborhoods and history of New York City - No special wiki knowledge is required! Also, please RSVP!-- Pharos ( talk) 17:39, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Hey there :). You're being contacted because you're an edit filter manager, At the moment, we're developing Version 5 of the Article Feedback Tool, which you may or may not have heard about. If you haven't; for the first time, this will involve a free-text box where readers can submit comments :). Obviously, there's going to be junk, and we want to minimise that junk. To do so, we're working the Abuse Filter into the tool.

For this to work, we need people to write and maintain filters. I'd be very grateful if you could take a look at the discussion here and the attached docs, and comment and contribute! Thanks :). Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 18:18, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

I should probably asked you before unblocking, but I unblocked User:Lola.2580 in the interests of assuming good faith and the risk to damage to wikipedia being small based on the prior edits of the socks involved. Please let me know if you disagree. -- Trödel 18:35, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

It really doesn't matter to me. If s/he isn't socking, that's all I care about. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 03:08, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

The Hoa Hao are evil, I survived and am on a mission to expose the truth about these evil xenophobes. I'll take legal action on this is I have too after I exhaust Wikipedia protocol. Your better off helping me find a resolution because I'm not going away — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.217.89.29 ( talk) 03:54, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

This is ejamison111 74.217.89.29 ( talk) 03:59, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

I was almost killed by the Hoa Hao and my blog has true accounts about insight into their beliefs and their culture. What is the purpose of having an external link section if you can't link to relevant material? How can I accomplish getting my page restored? You are enabling these evil xenophobes by hiding the truth about who they are. Please help

74.217.89.29 ( talk) 03:59, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

I am not enabling anyone. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and you may not use it to attempt to spread any message, no matter how good or evil this group may or may not be. Wikipedia is not a collection of external links; any additions must provide relevant, encyclopedic, information, not merely attempts to promote a message about an article's subject. Linking to blogs in general is not a great idea, and adding the same link indiscriminately to many pages will almost always be undone. If you take legal action against Wikipedia, you will be blocked without prejudice for the duration of the litigation. Wikipedia is not a place to spread the "truth" about anything. Wikipedia is a place to present well-sourced, cited, non-slanted information. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:11, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi J.delanoy. I have responded with 3 rather lengthy paragraphs on WP:ANEW#User:ElliotJoyce reported by User:Malik Shabazz (Result: ). Apologies for the length, but I believe my argument is sound and that Malik Shabazz is abusing his authority against me. If you have the time, please check out what I've written. I plan to revert Mr. Shabazz's edits on the Atlantic Slave Trade and African Slave Trade articles to what they originally were before the edit war began after a reasonable time has passed (yes, I am actually fighting for the original, not a change, but this is all explained at WP:ANEW#User:ElliotJoyce reported by User:Malik Shabazz (Result: )). Thanks. ElliotJoyce ( talk) 05:01, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for correctly removing my IP vandal report at AIV, which I had placed there in error. The IP I reported was actually reverting a vandal IP and I got the two mixed up. The vandal IP was subsequently blocked, and I have apologized to the good one. Thanks for all you do! Jus da fax 16:27, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I have tagged User:207.160.218.253, as an Edu IP, registered to Missouri Research and Education Network, University of Missouri. Might you wish to review the block length in the light of this? Best, TerriersFan ( talk) 15:50, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

I saw that it had been blocked in the past, but the last block expired almost a year ago, so I think it is unlikely that the current vandal is related to the one last year, so I chose a block length accordingly. If someone else feels the block is too short, I have no objections if they wish to lengthen it. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 15:53, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Good point; I just wanted to alert to the Edu IP status. I'm happy to leave it and see how it goes. Best, TerriersFan ( talk) 16:02, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

	The Special Barnstar
	Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! SwisterTwister talk 21:05, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello. A while back, I have reverted this edit (was using a different computer at the time) to Antarctica. I had thought that it was a bit humorous. I noticed spelling such as "hotest", and the word "fire" used in a context which I would not expect it to be used in, indicating that a find and replace was conducted. The IP address was registered to the postal service. I thought this was a little bit humorous. Not intending to attack another editor, but I almost could think that somebody was going postal! I was thinking you may wish to add this to your list of funny things on your user page if you believed that this was notable. 70.248.176.149 ( talk) 23:23, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello J.delanoy. Silenceplace ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), whom you have blocked, is requesting to be unblocked. The request for unblock is on hold while waiting for a comment from you. Regards, Danger! ^{High voltage!} 02:23, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

I still check my talk page, but I've been very, very busy IRL, and I really don't have enough time to look into this right now (I don't remember the case at all, but the block was made pretty close to when I was first given checkuser rights, so it is definitely possible that my inexperience resulted in me blocking an innocent user). Since the case in point is so old, checkuser is likely to be useless, but it may not hurt to have a checkuser take a look, since it appears that he was caught in a major spam takedown. Still, after three years, I'm inclined to say go ahead and unblock if there's nothing on checkuser. I do have to wonder, though, why he waited so long to make an unblock request... J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 13:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Hey, could you please delete my user page? Thanks. -- Veyneru ( talk) 13:46, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

The IP address 163.248.33.224 is from a school network, specifically that of Hillcrest High School. I did not personally vandalize wikipedia, but it's worth noting. Do with it what you will. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.248.33.224 ( talk) 16:50, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited!

Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics ( STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. 00:24, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

I think you missed a few:

• Americanfollowerr ( talk · contribs)
• Americanalabama ( talk · contribs)
• Americannebraska ( talk · contribs)

-- Calton | Talk 10:00, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

You are invited to Wikipedia Goes to the Movies in NYC, an editathon, Wikipedia meet-up and workshops focused on film and the performing arts that will be held on Saturday, December 1, 2012, at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts (at Lincoln Center), as part of the Wikipedia Loves Libraries events being held across the USA.

All are welcome, sign up on the wiki and at meetup.com!-- Pharos ( talk) 07:17, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

i got a message from you that my edit of the page on vice presidents was deleted but i made no such edit. hackers? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.10.68.174 ( talk) 03:25, 30 December 2012 (UTC)