hi!

Hello Imnotminkus, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

• Read the tutorial and learn how to edit a page.
• Experiment in the sandbox.
• Follow the Simplified Ruleset.
• Try to edit from a neutral point of view.
• Use talk pages to communicate with other editors.
• Be bold in updating pages.
• Eventually, read the Manual of Style and learn about the Five Pillars of Wikipedia.
• And most importantly, have fun!

If you need any help, see the help pages and glossary, add a question to the help desk, or ask me on my talk page.

I hope you will enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Good luck! — Bcat

You have an eye for detail : )

Adrian Lamo 05:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Dear Imnotminkus,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact with the new 1.2 version release it has even more power. As such we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that for security reasons, VandalProof's creator requires it's users to have made 250 edits to articles, which you have not. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again in the not too distant future. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. AmiDaniel ( talk) 08:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi, Imnotminkus, thank you for applying for VandalProof. I am happy to announce that you are now authorized for use, so if you haven't already, simply download VandalProof from our main page and install it, and you're all set!

Warning to Vandals: This user is armed with VandalProof.

Please join the VandalProof user category by adding either: {{ User:Vishwin60/Userbox/VandalProof}} (which will add this user box) or [[Category:Wikipedians using VandalProof]] to your user page.

If you have any queries, please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Welcome to our team! - Glen 07:37, 23 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Why did you revert that back to when the page said "WIKIPEDIA IS NOT RELIABLE ..."? Just wondering.

wj32 04:50, 4 November 2006 (UTC) reply

It seems I reverted only one edit when there were three edits that should've been reverted, or I probably could've just cleared the test section and replaced the "please leave this line alone" comment. Thanks for pointing it out. Minkus 22:09, 5 November 2006 (UTC) reply

This user is still adding the wallpaper links to the Simpsons articles Athletes Foot 21:22, 1 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Consider it ceased. - Brandon Harris 07:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC) reply

In a message to several recent editors of Schiavo-related pages, I write that: Input is sought here: Talk:Government_involvement_in_the_Terri_Schiavo_case#Edit_War_between_me_and_User:Calton.

-- GordonWatts 15:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC) reply

yea, so i vandalized your page so you need to update the number to 8 and the dude who reverted didnt, thanks minkus —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.128.139.226 ( talk • contribs) 03:12, 4 April 2007.

Don't worry, happens all the time. I was going to tell you earlier about the mistake (as me reverting your edits might look suspicious), but glad you figured it out, just the same. Vandals beware! :) Kakofonous ( talk) 03:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Awesome, thanks for watching my back. Guess I should probably be a bit more mentally awake when clicking buttons :D And happy vandal-fighting to you too! - Minkus ( talk) 03:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Eat shit, fucktard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.0.119.139 ( talk • contribs) 00:01, 1 March 2008

Sorry, but I'm more of a fan of Italian food. Also, unfortunately, my family has no dog. Again, sorry for the terrible, scarring disappointment I imagine the acquiring of this knowledge has caused you. - Minkus ( talk)

I'm Italian. You can eat my shit and we both win. 68.0.119.139 ( talk) 04:27, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Sorry, but I don't think it works that way. - Minkus ( talk) 04:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi, you are listed under Category:Wikipedians in Ohio or one of its subcategories. WikiProject Ohio has been slowing down and we're looking for active Ohioans to turn that around! But first, let us introduce ourselves; we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Ohio and we're sure there's somewhere you'll fit in just fine. The project's departments include article quality assessment: We have over 5,000 articles to assess for class alone, newsletter writing: This has been delayed by a few months, and new page patrolling: Which has also been slowing down. We also have a newly formed taskforce on our over 1,000 townships at WP:OHTWP.

We have 132 members, many of which are not active within the project. If you are listed there and still received this message please accept the auotmated porcess's apologies. If you are interested in joining us please list you name here. If you're not interested please note this is a one time invite and you will never hear from us again.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to leave a message at our talkpage or with any member of the project, we'll be happy to answer any of your questions. We look forward to seeing you around!

Delivered by: §hepBot ( Disable) 04:06, 25 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi. I've fulfilled your request. Please see WP:RBK or ask me if you need any help with the tool. Please remember to use it only for obvious vandalism or rverting your own edits when a more expansive edit summary is not needed. Happy editing! Pedro :  Chat  20:35, 15 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Are you from the Ohio area? A Wikipedian meetup is taking place on July 18, 2009 in Columbus. If you are interested in coming or would like more information, see the first Ohio meetup page.

Thanks! -- Rkitko ^{( talk)} 20:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I noticed that you reverted this edit as vandalism using Huggle this morning. I'm not sure how you concluded it was vandalism; as you can see it was actually an anon doing rather a nice job of cleaning up the references and putting them in to citation templates. I've used Huggle in the past and know how fast and furious it can get but may be if you could just slow down a tad and perhaps see past the "IP" you wouldn't get false positives. It's better that a bit of vandalism is live for 10 extra seconds than a potentially productive contributor gets scared off the project. Kind regards, Nancy ^talk 17:46, 14 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Whoops, sorry about that, and thanks for catching it. That was actually the first time I used Huggle and I was still trying to learn how to use it and what all the shortcut keys are and everything. I'll try to be more careful about that in the future. - Minkus ( talk) 18:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): I'm going to grant you an exemption for IP blocks based on your strong contributions. Let me know if there are any issues. Request handled by: Step hen 10:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC) reply Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Orange, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I had reverted the vandalism, your edit put it back and now I've reverted again. Thanks! LazyLizaJane ( talk) 20:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for catching that...seems Huggle didn't catch your reversion or you were too quick for it. (replied on your user page too). -- Minkus ( talk) 20:53, 23 June 2009 (UTC) reply

For this. Another attempt at giving the Internet-using population more than four seconds to get the impression that I have revealed a secret about myself on my user page has been foiled! Cheers. - SoSaysChappy ( talk) 14:56, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

You are quite welcome! I do what I can :D -- Minkus ( talk) 16:38, 26 June 2009 (UTC) reply

What have I added that is against copyright laws? 68.237.88.113 ( talk) 20:33, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Most song lyrics are copyrighted and cannot be included in, or linked to from, Wikipedia articles, like the ones you added to One Day in Your Life (Michael Jackson song). See here for more info. Sorry 'bout that, but feel free to improve the article in other ways! (also replied on your talk page)-- Minkus ( talk) 20:48, 28 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The true name of Amin Erbati is Elamine Erbate. I which you correct that. ( Hatim000) 00:00, 29 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user page! @}-,--`--,-- <-- a rose for you. -- bonadea contributions talk 07:08, 29 June 2009 (UTC) reply

You are quite welcome! I will put it into a vase to keep it prettyful forever. -- Minkus ( talk) 08:42, 30 June 2009 (UTC) reply

I suspect that User talk:Borusmat5 is a sockpuppet of User talk:Borusmat4.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 08:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Don't worry. Reported at AN!-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 09:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Also, thank you for reverting vandalism to my page. Much appreciated.-- The Legendary Sky Attacker 20:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Not a problem, I do what I can. Good lookin' out on the socks, too! -- Minkus ( talk) 20:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Please block user 59.93.76.173. The user is persistently vandalizing the article Kamma (caste). Kumarrao ( talk) 06:53, 3 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Just saw your message now. The vandalism from that IP seems to have stopped, but I'll keep an eye on it. If repeated vandalism occurs again, leave a message at WP:AIV and an administrator will consider a block (I don't have the authority to block IPs). Thanks for lookin' out :) -- Minkus ( talk) 08:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Hey, I just noticed your DOB. :-) -- Menti fisto 11:44, 18 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Muchas gracias for the happy birthday, Mentifisto! 'Twas a good one; I even got in some vandalfighting :D – Minkus ( talk) 03:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page, and reporting the user! Alxeedo TALK 03:30, 25 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Listen Karl Stefanovic is a robot and I am sick of you trying to hide the fact let me add him to all the robot pages this is not a joke I have proof just look at him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karl stefanovic fan ( talk • contribs) 03:58, 25 July 2009 (UTC) reply

the typo compromised/comprised typo. I will go through my edits again and double-check. 76.117.1.254 ( talk) 22:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC) reply

I think a vandal was offended by my reversion of his contributions, so he "blocked" me indefinitely. Thank you for undoing that ( diff). Good thing blocks don't work exactly that way.  – Newportm ( talk • contribs) 14:43, 30 July 2009 (UTC) reply

You're quite welcome! It would've been especially terrible if they did work that way, since the IP not only indef blocked you, but did it 10 times. Meaning you would've been blocked 10 times forever. Tragic. -- Minkus ( talk) 17:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the fast revert on my talk page and I apologize about the revert error on Jo Stanley it looks like huggle was lagging and I didn't realize it had already updated to you. Jamesofur ( talk) 07:29, 7 August 2009 (UTC) reply

You're quite welcome, and no worries, happens to me all the time! I see you've only been using Huggle for a few days...after a while, when more and more users are added to your whitelist, Huggle will warn you when reverting an edit by a whitelisted editor, so such things happen less often. Happy vandal fighting! - Minkus ( talk) 07:36, 7 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello Minkus,

I write regarding the Shoulderstand link removed from the subject entry. Could you please give me a little more details why you deemed it inappropriate? I think the article in the link is an unbiased source of information on the topic, that is not of a commercial nature.

I've seen a lot of unreliable web pages being linked on Yoga articles in Wikipedia, sites that present erroneous or, at best, superficial information. The magazine where my link appears has been in publication for over 30 years, and it offers a perspective on Yoga that is very different from the majority of the relatively new publications talking about this subject.

I would greatly appreciate if you also advise how I can avoid having my links labeled as spam in the future. I am sincere in my wish to make good information on Yoga and Meditation available to the public, as I'm troubled by the widespread misconceptions and ignorance on this topic.

With kind regards,

Pedro (yogboy)

Hello Minkus,

I have created a WP Prominent Rajus to mention famous people in Rajus an Indian community. I had used that convention to specify only famous Rajus of Rajus community. I have taken other encyclopedia as reference: http://www.statemaster.com/encyclopedia/Prominent-Rajus
http://en.allexperts.com/e/p/pr/prominent_rajus.htm

But this user C21K( talk) is consistently moving the WP Prominent Rajus to List of Rajus though I have given the strong reason of using such convention.

But as Prominent Rajus is the keyword more often used to search. I suggest it to be like that.

Request you to involve in this issue n resolve it. Also request you to see the previous record of C21K( talk). Let me know If I hav followed wrong naming convention in this matter.

Thanks Indianprithvi ( talk) 17:21, 8 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{ subst:Vangel}}! [midnight comet] [talk] 21:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Lol... vandal revert tangle (; Becritical ( talk) 06:27, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Ya, sorry 'bout that . Huggle let me down and crashed halfway through that, either 'cause it doesn't like Windows 7, or it didn't like me un-warning you :) - Minkus ( talk) 06:32, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply

I cited a reputable source and the statement is 100% true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.79.204.153 ( talk) 02:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply

I never said it wasn't a reputable source, just that it wasn't constructive. The sentence added didn't match with the style of the surrounding text, and nowhere in the article are specific examples given. Minkus ( talk) 02:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanx yuu. 2J Bäkkvire Maestro ^{RQQ et al} _{favorite haunts} 02:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply

You's welcomes! - Minkus ( talk) 03:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply

I am sorry but that is child porn. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GodBlessOurTroops ( talk • contribs) 05:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Your opinion has been heard. There is no problem with adding your opinion to the article's talk page, but please do not remove other users' comments in the process. Minkus ( talk) 05:47, 14 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Let's chat. Why do you think I am vandalize? —Preceding unsigned comment added by GodBlessOurTroops ( talk • contribs) 05:47, 14 March 2010 (UTC) reply

As I stated above, removal of discussion among other users on an article's talk page is considered vandalism. Minkus ( talk) 05:50, 14 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Can you look at my sourcing please? 86.177.218.90 ( talk) 23:43, 3 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Replied on your talk page. — Minkus ( talk) 03:12, 4 April 2010 (UTC) reply

you heard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.163.168 ( talk) 17:28, 6 April 2010 (UTC) reply

One cannot speak on the internets, thus one cannot shut up. nice try though. - Minkus ( talk) 17:53, 6 April 2010 (UTC) reply

An article that you have been involved in editing, Aaron Shaw (piper), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Shaw (piper). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 12:40, 10 May 2010 (UTC) reply

An article that you have been involved in editing, Halloween Horror Nights (Orlando) and/or Halloween Horror Nights (Hollywood), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halloween Horror Nights (Hollywood). -- Kiwisoup ( talk) 00:04, 19 June 2010 (UTC) reply

You are invited to participate in Project Cleveland, a WikiProject dedicated to developing and improving articles about Cleveland, Ohio.

(We could really use your help!) Ryecatcher773 ( talk) 06:31, 30 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. — DoRD ( talk) 16:35, 8 July 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Kenneth E. Patton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced BLP, fails WP:POLITICIAN; no references that show notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tassedethe ( talk) 23:55, 14 May 2011 (UTC) reply

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
-- Kumioko ( talk) 21:17, 5 September 2011 (UTC) reply

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
-- Kumioko ( talk) 02:41, 13 December 2011 (UTC) reply

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
-- Kumi-Taskbot ( talk) 19:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, John M. Coyne, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources:  "John M. Coyne" –  news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 17:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Please block User:100loves, because the user is persistently vandalizing the musical genres for some David Bowie's albums.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hey Brian - I'm Kevin, a student at Ohio State University and president of Wikipedia Connection, a student organization that focuses on Wikipedia. As a Columbus resident, I wanted to invite you to join us at our upcoming Art+Feminism Edit-A-Thon on Saturday, March 5, from 1 - 5 PM. The event will be taking place on the 3rd floor of the 18th Avenue Library on campus. We'll have food, goodies, and resources - all you'll need to bring is your laptop :) Do sign up if you're interested, and if you know anyone else who might be interested in attending (regardless of editing experience), please let them know! Reach out to me with any questions. Thanks, ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 17:13, 22 February 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello, Imnotminkus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi Imnotminkus,

I'm Kevin, one of the founding members of the Ohio Wikimedians User Group. Created in July 2016, we're working to be a central group of Ohio Wikimedians who organize and support offline events, promote the Wikimedia movement in Ohio, build connections throughout our state, and above all, support each other. We already have a handful of members and have worked to support multiple events, including Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States and several Art+Feminism edit-a-thons at universities throughout Ohio.

I wanted to reach out to you and invite you to join the Ohio Wikimedians User Group. Being a part of the user group will allow easy communication between active Ohio editors, notifications of upcoming events in the Ohio area, and, if you're interested, the opportunity to help organize events such as edit-a-thons or workshops. Some notes:

• All members receive a monthly newsletter with recent happenings, upcoming events, and more. Check out our April newsletter here.
• This Thursday at 8:30 EST, we're having our first online meeting. Check out our meeting page here for more details, an agenda, and a section to sign up if you'd like to join us. Topics will include introductions and brainstorming for future projects.

Right now we have a Wikipedia Takes Columbus photo event going on, a Wiknic coming up this summer, and opportunities to attend the upcoming Ohio Private Academic Libraries Conference. If you're interested in joining us, feel free to add your name here - and feel free to reach out to me (or post on the user group's talk page) with questions or discussions. Thanks! ~ Super Hamster Talk Contribs 07:33, 18 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello, Imnotminkus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello Minkus!!! That is all. PolymathGirl ( talk) 01:01, 10 August 2018 (UTC) reply

Howdy @ Bush6984:! 'sup?! Minkus ( talk) 19:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, Imnotminkus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) reply

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) reply

Hello Imnotminkus! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC) reply