DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
Hello, Ilir pz, and
welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for
your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 14:13, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Please forgive me, Asterion, I will not repeat my mistake again :)))) Ilir pz 00:29, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Your opinion would be appriciated here regarding deletion of the article Serbophobia. Thanks -- Dado 20:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Ilir, do you actually believe in what you are writing on the Kosovo page? Gianni ita 21:55, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
No comments to you anymore.I don't like your cynism! Ilir pz 13:17, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
How do you explain Albanians? a migrating gypsy nation from Azerbaijan who fought under Adolf Hitler, later under Soviet influence. Are not Albanians people who side with the best? you know like those people who suck dick to stay alive. Now they claim Serbian, Greek and Macedonian (Greek) lands, whilst Greeks were in the Balkans at least 4000 years, and Albania never existed. Greek feed your children, but you not humans, your sub-human animals that side with the winning side, a country with no history, no national heroes, except you steal other countries history and proclaim its your ancestors the "Illyrians", which is complete bullshit like Hitler's Aryan race. Anyways get a life, all Islam-o-fascists will be wiped out from Europe, sorry EUROPE DOES NOT WANT ISLAM.
Thanks for uploading Image:Citys_of_Kosova1.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Why did you ask in the first place? -- HolyRomanEmperor 16:45, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Så du kan norska, vad roligt! :) Tyvärr må jag säga att det är ganska tråkigt när du skriker och gapar att jag vandaliserar och borde blockas. Jag tror inte du förstår vad vandalism är för jag är neutral tillskillnad från dig. Har jag någonsin sagt eller hotat med att ”stoppa dig” så som du hotat mig? Tillskillnad från dig så vet jag att alla är välkomna på wikipedia så länge man följer NPOV regeln. Det är så patetiskt att du hänvisar mig till serbiska wikipedia bara för att jag bidrar med saker som inte går väl i hand med din fantasi verklighet. Du säger att du försvarar ditt land men du skadar det bara genom att förneka saker. Nationalism och extremism är inte rätt, någonsin. Ingen bryr sig om att diskutera mina saker på diskussions sidan, alla bara bråkar, så varför ska jag bry mig om att skriva där först. Nu har jag förklarat mig nog för dig. Jag lovar dig också att jag ALDRIG kommer låta extremismen vinna! Jag har också gott om tid att vara på Wikipedia så du kan inte skrämma mig med att säga att du aldrig kan stoppas. :) Så det vore väldigt uppskattat om du blev mer öppensinnad och inte bedrev någon mera extremism. Tack! :) Litany
Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Šar mountain. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Dijxtra 20:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
OK, but what provocative messages you meant? -- HolyRomanEmperor 15:55, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
I feel sorry for all Albanians in Kosovo, too bad they don't have their own country... Oh, wait, yes they do, it's called Albania. Why do you seek to create a Greater Albania, and call the Serbs nationalist? Why can't you live happily in Serbia, with your own president, parliament and autonomy? Is living in Serbia so bad? Compate Priština to Belgrade. Which city looks better/richer? Do you have any idea how much Serbian money goes into Kosovo each year? Why independence? And please, don't tell me "well, because Serb forces ethnically cleansed Albanians in Kosovo in 1998 and 1999", Kosovars have been pushing for independence since 1981, and the intention of Serb forces was to eliminate separatists.
You might get your independence one day, but you should never be proud of the way you got it. The world wants Kosovo to be independent so they can use your resources, all factories will be privatized, and Kosovars will be more poor than ever. This is not about Serbian nationalism, the issue is much larger in scope. I don't care about the Wikipedia article anymore, what frightens me is how there are a lot of people willing to become slaves of Western powers, and aren't educated enough to understand the basic principles of totalitarianism and globalization. That's why Serbia suffered bombings and world isolation, for not wanting to become "just like everyone else". Sadly, Kosovo will probably become just like India, Pakistan, Algeria, and all the other nations that separated from larger countries, and lived through hell, before they could be called "developing countries". -- Serbiana ₪ 02:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I expected you wouldn't comment. Keep dreaming of your Kosova... -- Serbiana ₪ 08:52, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Mos i shaj këta idiotat se mujnë me ta bo block. Shitu ma car, fol me fakte. Aeternus 18:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
You are in danger of being blocked for violating the 3-revert rule. -- Serbiana ₪ 00:43, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I wouldn't have to revert anything, if you didn't revert my every attempt to make an article more neutral. -- Serbiana ₪ 08:08, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Yes, I think it is very obvious. I told you several times that we should discuss an issue, and you just reply with "dream on", "my loving country Kosova" and now "no comment". Mark my words, you will be blocked one day, when you least expect it. -- Serbiana ₪ 08:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's Neutral point of view policy, if you haven't already. It basically states that an article should include all sides of an issue, no matter how ridiculous you perceive them to be. Your edits made to the Kosovo article were not neutral, such as your changes done to the History section. Take a look at the Panchen Lama page for example - it lists the Tibetan one and the one appointed by the Chinese government. Many people (including myself) know that the Tibetan one is the only "real one", but to be neutral we have to include (what many see) as the fake one. After all, Tibet is in China. You see what I'm saying?
I hope you do, and that in the future we can work together to improve and help Wikipedia. -- Khoikhoi 09:02, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Ilir, Khoikhoi is making a general point, and you are not getting it! You are pushing your own agenda without consideration for others. You have to look at every issue from a neutral point of view. Concerning the article about Agim Ceku, you repeatedly deleted the sentence where it says that he was indicted for war crimes by the Serbian gov't because you think its irrelevant. You can't just say that everything you write is neutral, when so many people are complaining, and only the Albanians are supporting you. Open your eyes. -- Serbiana ₪ 09:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I agree, and I've told Ilir many times that we should cooperate in making the article more NPOV, and his his replies were "Very funny", "blla blla blla" and his famous quote - "Your edits will be reverted. You are nobody to decide which is more NPOV version.". So, how can I continue working with this guy if he continues to ignore me and my edits? -- Serbiana ₪ 09:33, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Is there anything that's not true in what I've said? There really is a country called Albania. Serb forces really did have orders to eliminate separatists. "Keep dreaming of your Kosova" was a response to you saying "Keep dreaming" when I mentioned that Kosovo is a part of Serbia, which it really is. So, what was your point when you were writing my quotes? -- Serbiana ₪ 09:47, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry for your loss. I hope the soldiers who did that will be brought to justice one day and brutaly punished fro what they did. OK, as much as I hate to admit it, Serbs did commit terrible crimes in Kosovo, but wether it was organized from Belgrade or not, is not known. But we are not discussing that, we are discussing how you're looking at the situation from one side. Why did the soldiers do that? Did the Serbian gov't just say "Hey, lets go kill Albanians in Kosovo for no damn reason..."? -- Serbiana ₪ 10:01, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I don't think all Albanians are terrorists, you can't just make an assumption like that. One of my best friends is an Albanian who lives in Germany, I'm still in touch with him. Nothing is just black and white, right and wrong. You must look at everything from both sides, at least in this encyclopaedia. -- Serbiana ₪ 09:36, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
What you're saying is partly true. I don't live in Serbia anymore, and most of my friends used to refer to Albanians as filthy, ugly people. I agree that some Serb forces ethnically cleansed Albanians from Kosovo, and yes, it may have been mass organized. And I wouldn't have anything against that information to be in the article. But, not to mention that Serbs were cleansed as well, makes me mad. I would never apologize for anything that soldiers did in Kosovo, because I personally don't feel responsible, since my parents always voted against Milosevic. This agruement can go on 4ever. Lets stop fighting and seriously think of a way to improve the Kosovo-related articles. 1st step - Do you recognize that Kosovo is a part of Serbia under UN control? (Yes or No) -- Serbiana ₪ 09:57, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Until its status is defined, it is not a part of any country. Indications show that will not be the case in the future as well. Read Contact group statement number 6: The Contact Group Guiding Principles of November 2005 make clear that there should be: no return of Kosovo to the pre-1999 situation, no partition of Kosovo, and no union of Kosovo with any or part of another country.
I am for referring to the official authority in Kosova as of now. Else, I will have to revert the changes you and others make, which are speaking with the language of the previous regime in Kosova. Thank you, Ilir pz 10:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Then we have nothing else to discuss. -- Serbiana ₪ 10:07, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ilir, This is a note I sent to a number of Croatian editors, but I feel that it might be of interest to you as the user in question has already been active on pages related to Kosova.
Regards EurowikiJ 13:21, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Ilir, të kam regjistruar në kategorinë "Wikipedians in Kosovo". Ja, shikoje: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedians_in_Kosovo Thirri edhe shokët e tu kosovarë që të regjistrohen këtu, sepse vetëm kështu mund të bëhemi bashkë kundër okupatorit. Aeternus 15:47, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
You made personal attacks or near-personal attacks here, here, twice here, some more on the Kosovo and Priština articles.
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy: There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be blocked for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thanks, -- HolyRomanEmperor 22:46, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. Thank yous -- HolyRomanEmperor 22:46, 4 April 2006 (UTC)--
Please understand, Wikipedia has Serb editors and Croat editors and Slovene editors and Bosniak editors and Kosovar editors and Guatemalan editors and Paraguayan editors and Danish editors and Rwandan editors and editors who are in the scientific camps in Antarctica.
You - all of you - must learn to get along with each other. This is not a battleground; it is an encyclopedia. The truly violent people aren't here. If angry people cannot learn to control their tempers - despite how justified that anger may (or may not) be - then they will be blocked from editing.
Removing the warnings from your talk page goes against protocol, as it could be interpreted that you are attempting to deceive the administrators into thinking you have not committed any previous infractions. DS 01:10, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
OK, Ilir, the comment above makes sense... Kosovo is governed by the United Nations, and it's status is unresolved. I won't push for the "Kosovo is a part of Serbia" anymore... This bickering is leading nowhere, and I've decided to just let go of some opinions that have been probably subliminaly engraved in my head by the previous Serb government. Let's forget about what was in the past, and look forward to a better future where, hopefully, Albanians and Serbians can live together in peace. Will you forgive me for being an ass? -- Serbiana ₪ 01:48, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
...do anything if you keep it up this way... -- HolyRomanEmperor 19:39, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
You made a note that I made personal attacks on my talk page, but without references to where I did that. Please also see, when regarding your controversal user page Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point.
Note that I am intent on removing your post from my talk page, because you simply didn't source it. Strangely, you put it after my warning for your continuous personal attacks against the Wikipedian Community, so this can only be interpreted as a frustrating revenge.
A osht shka qyky HolyRomanEmperor-i a? Nëse po, vetëm tregom, ja tregoj unë atij se ku e ka vendin! Aeternus 16:33, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Nimoma pakes mos po gabojë: Template talk:Districts of Serbia-- Hipi Zhdripi 19:00, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Të lutem, të lutem për korigjoj gabimet gjuhësore këtë fleten -- Hipi Zhdripi 23:14, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
First of all, I am not Serbian. Second of all, please point out why would someone consider that? I never used words like Serbian fascists or similiar (unlike you, my friend). I've never had issues with Albanians, two wiki-Albanians (one contributing to the Serbian wikipedia) are my best wiki-companions, and the first time that I have problems is with you. Hopefully, this is just a temporary misunderstanding, chump. :) If you find any offense whatsoever, please point it out to me so that I can correct errors. My non-contributing work? I greatly expanded the article and repairded unendigly bad grammar. You, on the other hand, keep fighting a revert war against the Wikipedia Community restoring the age-old inconsistent version of the article. And the article's name's not Kosova, but Kosovo. This is not an insult (as you may have understood my every single word), but a note to the name of the article. -- HolyRomanEmperor 23:40, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Yes, I know that he was labelled that way; but hey, after the Yugoslav Wars, Slobodan Milosevic was Man of the Year according to New York Times and even a Nobel Prize of Peace candidate suggested by the British government. The UN Chancellorship decided to give him a seat in the UN office for his work. But remember what is Milosevic? The greatest criminal of modern Europe... -- HolyRomanEmperor 19:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I wasn't aware that that anon was you. I'm going to stay away from that page, and most Balkan-related articles for that matter - I'm trying to not get myself involved in more controversies. -- Khoikhoi 23:26, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
I hope you really have changed attitued but the templates on your user page may talk for it self. I can guarantee you too that I will continue fight against extremism, of any kind. I hope you understand that the Albanian extremism you are contributing with are not any better than the Serbian others are contributing or any extremism at all. Do you find me a serious threat just because I not support extrem nationalism? I must revert the Kosovo page sadly since you delete very important information but I agree with you on other things about the page. See Talk:Kosovo for explanations. You have previously not answeared my reply on your talk page nor on the Kosovo talk page. I hope we could work something out as always. There is no news about that. My best, Litany
History for Litany As you mentioned you are interested in history, maybe you find it useful to check this article or book [3]. Regards, Ilir pz 10:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the link to the article. It's always useful, but I've allready taken part of this one. Litany
A e ngon ti John Lennon-in a? Aeternus 18:59, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
See: Talk:Serbia -- Hipi Zhdripi 19:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 21:06, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I can't remember fighting a war against you. ;) I only made several additions to the history, and reverted three times to my version since you restored the broken version. I said that I took you for a vandal, because you only said "Nazi-like Serbian propaganda" and kept change the to teh, adding false arguements in the history like Nemanja's Croatdom and other total nonsences. How did you think I would characterize your edits? Ofcourse, I will take a part of responsibility in the misunderstanding, naturaly.
You didn't understand my comments? You said: Nice barnstars you're exchanging with Asterion. You will note that I haven't given him any barnstar, how're we exchanging then? Then you said: Is that Arkan's emblem or it only seems like? Arkan is a murderous thug that executed a bunch of my friends and family, and is a xenophobic hater of everything that my (recent, don't ask ;) kin/people stands for. I understood that you not only like Albanian criminals, but also Serbian/Yugoslav? That post seemed like all you care about are killers. What did Nebeski narod? mean?
About the Milosevic part, well; the entire world in the first half of the 1990s recognized him as the peacekeeper of the century, and yet he is the greatest bad-guy of modern Europe. You also said that Agin Ceku was rated by someone (I was drawing a parallel). Note, that Ceku said that he cannot guarrantee the status of Serbs if Kosovo doesn't get its independence. So, if Kosovo doesn't get its independence, the Serbs are doomed, and if Kosovo becomes independent, they're surely done for. What kind of a Premier is that, threating (note, that is a threat) the World? I thought that only Miloshevich had the guts to go that far too much.
I would gladly continue the discussion, but here, on your talk page, instead. Now, I'm all ears, my friend. :) -- HolyRomanEmperor 21:45, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Prishtina.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are
open content,
public domain, and
fair use. Find the appropriate template in
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 01:20, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Skenderbeuinprishtina.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are
open content,
public domain, and
fair use. Find the appropriate template in
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 01:21, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Futa njo që e ki bo vetë dhe që nuk është i lejuar ndryshimi.-- Hipi Zhdripi 23:19, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Hello Ilir! I invite you to join the WikiProject Serbia. I'd really appreciate it if you joined us :) All the best, -- serbiana - talk 04:07, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
I really have no idea what nebeski narod stands for. Where you reffering to some mentions of Serbs being a Heaven People? :)))) I've heard this; but only from one Serb (out of 10 million) and he lives in a mental institution...
I might add that I lost my (only) sister...
Agin might not've threatened the world, but he sure did make a threat. Please just read what he said. If Kosovo doesn't get it's independence, I cannot guarrantee the rights of Serbs. That means that Kosovo must be independent, whether anyone (including the whole Kosovar people) liked it or not. How's that not a threat? Anyway, I already pointed out to you the many mischiefs that Agin Ceku did, so his word simply cannot be trusted. Can we trust the words of Milosevic?
Rugova was not the only peaceful man. I refresh your memory, he always won the majority of votes. So we are talking about the majority of Kosovars, right? Who are you referring to as Albanian terrorism? Which independent court accussed the above three that you mentioned as terrorists?? Ilir pz 21:49, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
However, I simply disagree that there is future for the ethnic Serbs on Kosovo. Either way, the Serbs are going to pass badly and so are the 1,000-year old Monasteries. It's simply done. Milosevic fused (Greater) Albanian nationalism by killing 9,000-10,000 Albanians and evicting over 700,000. This resulted in 1,000-2,000 dead Serbs and over 100,000 Serbian refugees altogether. After 1999, the situation got worse, as 300,000 (the majority being Serbs) were practicly ethnicly cleansed by the Albanian paramilitary forces. Remember the 2004 March Pogrom? 156 Orthodox Churches and Monasteries were destroyed, the most magnificent of the surely the Monastery of Saint Archangel from Prizren from the 14th century or Our Lady of Ljevis also in the vicinity from the 12th century.
P. S. Oh, and I just viewed the entire history of Kosovo. I only reverted your edits twice, both of the time when you restored mass inconsistencies, grammar errors, self-contradictory facts and broken links... and both were very long ago, with a very wide time-gap. So, where's this you keep reverting? :) -- HolyRomanEmperor 14:16, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
I would wonder and treat carefully why you gave him a star... Please see Hipi Zhdripi. He has been conducting anti-Albanian propaganda by removing the Albanian naming of the entire entity and its capital city, rm the official Albanian language as well as the Heads of the Transitory Government and the Transitory State; removed altogether the Albanians from the population and simply deleted the entire explaination on the controversy.
Hehe I assume that was a mistake, or he was ironic. If not, I would also be surprised he added that. :))))) I added a suggestion to proceed further in the Kosovo article, before it is late and this revert-war goes on forever, and people dont feel like stopping anymore. Hope you agree with it, as you are one of the most active there. The star I awarded him for being so persistent in trying to make his point and trying to explain with his limited language abilities. His efforts I awared, but ...hmm...after that last edit, not sure :)))) Ilir pz 22:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Posto si ziveo jedno vreme u Beogradu, nadam se da ces ovde glasati za Article Improvement Drive, pa da Beograd bude izabrani clanak. I would appreciate your vote. -- serbiana - talk 03:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Ma mirë me shkru të thyme. Qysh po doket asgjë nuk po shijhet që ky ashtë hipi e zhdripi. haha. Po tasht qysh tasht duhet me dite qe kta e marin edhe ne gjuht tjera. Nuk asht ne pytje vetem anglisht po ele ne tjerat.-- Hipi Zhdripi 18:19, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
You are wilkommen in Wikipedia:WikiProject Dardania-- Hipi Zhdripi 20:24, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Hipi po donë mu bo Zhdripi po une në anglish nuk di me shkru Zhdripi. Po jam i sigur se ti munesh shum ma mirë se une. Për qita ish kon mirë me u lajmëru te guri i muhalles-- Hipi Zhdripi 03:51, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Aeternus 14:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
In your last edits, you have marked the changes as a minor edit. This is not right. A minor edit generally implies trivial changes only, such as typo corrections, formatting and presentational changes and rearranging of text without changing any content. Therefore, any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it involves one word. The distinction between major and minor edits is significant because you may decide to ignore minor edits when viewing recent changes; logged-in users can even set their preferences to not display them. No one wants to be fooled into ignoring a significant change to an article simply because it was marked "minor." So remember to consider the opinions of other editors when choosing this option. Asterion 22:32, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Following your recent edit,
I'd like to remind you to be civil and to not form personal attacks or edit wars through your or others' comments; doing so will only cause tension and annoyance.
Regards, Asterion 23:30, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
You said "Ilir pz, you are confusing me. You are also avoiding my questions and advices. Of course the split of Yugoslavia whould have been like the one between Sweden and Norway. I can tell you that Wikipedia is NOT for PERSONAL OPINIONS. Therfor I will not answear your question whenever I want to see a Independant Repubulic of Kosova, or if Kosovo and Methoija should stay within the Union of SCG. It woulden't change my opinions on anything if they whould be independant or if they would stay. The most important is the best for the people and to keep the culture heritage of all peoples. If you want to know a very good reason why the question about Kosovos independance should be on the hold? More areas like, western Macedonia, Sandzak and Republika Srpska could strive for independance and this whould only be more unstable for the whole region and maybe in the worst case produce more wars. My opinion is baised that education, democracy and finacial investments are the only way for Kosovo and the rest of Balkan to be a peaceful part of Europe. From now on I will answear on your talk page, since we are commited to two discussions with the same topics. Best regards Litany"
First, I would like to warn you to try to work out with Asterion. I know that you two are a little on edge, but please try to find a common language. The Greeks are of high respect on wiki, and francly, as much as I am ashamed to admit, if any third party arrives, they will most likely choose a Greek over an Albanian (or Macedonian, or Bulgarian, Turk or alike). -- HolyRomanEmperor 11:38, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Second of all, when the governments of the Republics of Montenegro and Serbia met, deciding the future status of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Serbia's Premier had argued that he will accept all terms that Montenegro's government desires, except for renaming the country; while on the other hand, Montenegro's President argued that that in fact is the only things that bugs him. He suggested "State Union of Serbia and Montenegro". This worried Koshtunica and the others, so they invited several UN officials as mediators. The UN (lesser, though) official was surprised that they even though that and considered that the Yugoslav governments was trying to openly spit on the Albanian politicians of Kosovo. He asked the government How long will you think that Albanian politicians are stupid? Ofcourse the renaming will not affect the 1244 resolution!"
You might also view this BBC report (regarding the Church matters): Morto i Serbi She wrote that exactly on the ruins of that age-old Church. And she's a young girl.What do you think the other wil...? -- HolyRomanEmperor 11:47, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
And here you can see it while its burning. -- HolyRomanEmperor 11:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Asterion 11:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
this Human Rights Watch contains the most detailed list of the 2004 Pogrom.
More from BBC about the burnt Churches and the most interesting are these: Krystallnacht and Albanians posed as Serbs to stoke ethnic fires in Kosovo.
Suffice to say; when a British sees five Balkan men: a Serb, a Croat, a Greek, an Albanian and a Bulgarian. And all five give different versions. What I meant to say is that they will automaticly discard the non-Greeks and vouch the Greek version as the real one. That's what I mean. I was warning you that the Greek wikipedians are of high respect on wiki, and they are the only ones who are in the European Union and the NATO, as well as they didn't fight any wars. You would be wondered what I hear on Chat: dirty and stupid Serbs; they're both entirely fault for screwing up the Balkans and similiar, sorry for the usage of obscure language, but I was trully quoting...
You mentioned Bosnians. Didn't you mean Bosniaks? And not Kostunica and the Montenegrin government, but the FRJ and the UN. The man that was saying that was a UN official and the UN is, as I believe, the governing body of the Kosovo Province.
I explained the Serbian/Albanian. First one order at the beginning of the article and then the other at the other place to satisfy all sides. I apologized to you for the revert, but please see my facts on Talk:Kosovo. All the best (trully, I mean this; no matter how much we disagree, you can always count on me to back you up, my friend :). -- HolyRomanEmperor 18:08, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
This situation with the Montenegrin people is really complicated. Historically, Montenegrins were ethnic Serbs, and currently, most view themselves as Serbs in the cultural-linguistic-religious manor (Serbian Orthodox Church, Serbian language, Serbian Culture and Tradition). With regards, Serbia purged itself from Criminals of the old 1990s by the end of 2000. However, the currect Montenegro's President is the same man that stood outside the siege of Dubrovnik, that followed Arkan to Prizren; that dispatched war parties to Vukovar and Sarajevo. So is the Montenegrin Premier. Additionally, they were Miloshevich's greatest buddies. The only reason for Montenegro's independence is to save the government from prison (Italy is prosecuting Milo Djukanovic for a long time for smuggling cigarettes and weaponry) and to create Montenegro into a Criminal Haven. The problem is that the Goverment is incredibly wealthy, as they are War Profiteers from the Yugoslav Wars, and they never answered for their deeds. Practicly, not even 20% of Montenegro's citizens are ethnic Montenegrins in the real sence of the word, while over 70% are Serbs, either by nationality or other. The current government of Montenegro is in the likehood of Milosevic's regime and is practicly occupied the state and the people. That's why, the referendum is destined to fail. Polls say that there's a 70% chance that M will stay in the union and not even 40% of the population have voted for independence on the test-voting. -- HolyRomanEmperor 18:24, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Shiko të lutem mos po na vandalizojin Serbin e po e shkatrrojin artikullin, po menoj harten e Serbis dhe Malit të Zi në atë artikull. Dhe artikulli Prizren Party duhet zgjeruar dhe duhet shkuar se ai është bërë tradicional dhe festohet nga qytetarët e Prizrenit së bashku me ushtarët e KFORIT. Duhet me përkthye edhe tekstin e ftesës në anglish unë nuk po di.
Teksti i fotografisë gjendet i shënuar kur të shikon redaktimin:
-- Hipi Zhdripi 02:45, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Backing you up by encouraging you not to give up whatever you plan on doing and spreading good words to other wikipedians, naturally. I think that User:Hipi Zhdripi has really gone too far. Look what he wrote at User_talk:PANONIAN or User_talk:The_Minister_of_War]]. Then take a look at the history of my User Page. He's really going to far, I think that a full-scale block from wikipedia might be the only solution.
But why did you mean Citizen of Bosnia? The Serbs (largest nation of BiH) wanted to live with Serbia; Bosniaks (most numerious group) wanted independence and Croats wanted to live with Croatia. That's why the war interrupted in the first place, so I assumped that you could only mean Bosniaks.
What do you think about the Montenegrins issue (my comments)? -- HolyRomanEmperor 19:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Oh, I forgot a thingy: on Talk:Kosovo you said: That would help me know as well. That is all. 165 seems to me to be a biased number. There aren't that many churches in total, including the Roman Catholic ones I think.
Well, the problem is that those 165 were only a fragment of the Orthodox Serb Churches and Monasteries on Kosovo. Too bad that those 165 included those 8 centuries old. Just before the arrival of the Ottoman Turks, there were around 1,300 on Kosovo alone. Islam and most-recent Albanian military movements (you must admit) have teared down that number, you must admit. For if not, today Kosovo would be the largest concentration of Orthodox Christianity on Earth (like it was). I think that if we count all the ruins of Churches and Monasteries since then, we would have at least by a half more than 1,300. Sincerely yours. -- HolyRomanEmperor 09:33, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Unë kohëve të fundit po jom shumë i nxonun me obligime jashtë-kompjuterike, kështu që s'po muj me kontribu shumë. Por, duhesh gjithsesi mi kontaktu rrjetën. Kta jon profesionista edhe kishin mujt me na ndihmu teper. Informacionet tjera i gjen atje... Aeternus 16:05, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
sure we can talk here not in HRE's talk page. You said: "Good if I provide you with it. ;) And yes I have. Maybe you only see what you wanna see? I've re-written alot of edits from people with only IP numbers, claiming that the country is called Kosovo i Methoija, etc. BTW why not answearing what I wrote to you on your talk page? Litany"
hehehe yes, you made my day, thanks a lot. check what you reverted "the country is called Kosovo i Methoija" hehehehehehe. I really thank you. Have a nice day! Ilir pz 16:50, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
I think that Asterion's being a little rough on you. But then again, I can understand his attitude, and I believe that so can you. Did you notice how I keep staying cool and sweattalk to you? That's because you didn't say Somebody ban HRE vandal!!! for a few hundred times like you did in Asterion's case. Although, you have changed and I wish that Asterion could see that too. I'll note it on his talk page. I only wish that you try to be nice to him that you can work it out together.
P. S. You stopped talking at the talk page. -- HolyRomanEmperor 19:36, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Hello Ilir - you wrote: Hello Mr. Dignan. I recently noticed your contributions to the stub issues related to all cities and locations of Kosovo. I am not sure your contributions would calm down the tension that already exists between the parties involved in the dispute. As much as I respect your professionalism, and your determination to comply to the Wiki rules, I would encourage you to think of compromising solutions when dealing with sensitive topics. As far as stub issue is concerned, for the topic I am addressing, I would suggest you initiate a "stub" modification for disputed territories, and not instead fuel up the tensions by following some rules, which are temporary always.
See: Talk:Federal Republic of Yugoslavia-- Hipi Zhdripi 17:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Too bad that you voted neutral, I thought that you object nothin'... Could you presicely say why you objected?
Well, I'm keeping matters strictly proffessional. There is a 60% chance that they are the same user, and 40% chance that they're not, which makes me right in both cases :))) -- HolyRomanEmperor 11:39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Ilir, lirisht kërkoju ndihmë atyre, sepse nëse ata vet nuk e bëjnë, i thonë dikujt tjetër që ta bën. -- Aeternus 14:40, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Ilir provoje ta kriosh një projekt së bashku me PANONIN ashtu që të gjeni një zgjidhje për gjitha artikujt. (transletit, is not correct but it mean the same) Pleace trai to make a project with PANONIA to presant the both sei of Kosovo. I m going to trai to be neutral and support you two. Hipi
I changed templates on the Kosovo cities articles: removed reference to car plates since you said that all have the same, and changed "coat of arms" with "flag". Ok now? PANONIAN (talk) 19:49, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
I have upload it at wiki commons. You can see there are 29 maps. the mape of Malisheva is not there beacose the order of this komun are not difenedet. In fackt this is in the Law. There are many new under (subdivisions) livel of this komuns but they must be pasentit as part of this komuns wich are in this time present. Dragash is now in two divesions (Dragashi and Opoja ? ) but in the livel of Kosovo they are one komune. Tung from vandal rebel Hipi.
Ups!!! The names in albanian L. are officel (atention! the extremes kosovars wont to use the new name). If you two needs somthing abou the images call me [6].
See:
Hipi just wrote there that Kosovo cities does not have flags. He showed me this link from Albanian Wikipedia where city have coat of arms:
Should we restore part of the tables where is written coat of arms instead of flag? PANONIAN (talk) 14:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Just letting you know that you voted twice at this RFA. I have striked you're original vote and kept the second vote and your decision. Moe ε 00:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I have not forgotten about the article :). I was just giving it time so that other users would get a chance to express their view on my proposal, since I'd prefer to act with consensus. However, if no one posts there within the next few hours, I will go ahead with the unprotection. It will happen today. Thanks for the reminder, though. Redux 16:19, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ilir, Why do you object so much to having Kosovo listed as what it is, a province of Serbia under UN administration? I have given you the facts and the sources and you have still been unable to provide a single one. I already explained you that an encyclopaedia is not a matter of personal preferences. As far as everyone is concerned, Kosovo is still part of Serbia and we need to show this as it is. Whatever happens next, wikipedia will reflect the changes, but at this point, you cannot simply call it a "territory" as this factually incorrect. Quoting from the UN website: "...Within Serbia there are two semi-autonomous provinces, Vojvodina (21,506 km2) in the north and Kosovo and Metohija (10,887 km2) in the south.". I could go on but you already know all this anyway. -- Asterion talk to me 20:58, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
I have transferred discusion about Kosovo page from my personal to Kosovo talk page. Discussion is not personal, so it belongs there. If you have something personaly to say to me, please feell invited on my talk page. -- Manojlo 16:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Discussion was partly personal, as YOU removed and added content according to your wishes. Well, keep removing them from your talk page, show your manners. 16:43, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for protecting it from Manojlo! (the Kosovo article) -- HolyRomanEmperor 16:56, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Also, I added the "Metohijas" to resemble the Communist Yugoslavia period. The official name was (short) SAP KOSMET; and the shorter version was Социјалистичка Аутономна Покрајина Косово и Метохија. Why not call it by the then-offical name? -- HolyRomanEmperor 17:28, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
I will be obliged to report your reverting. I supplied more than enough relevant evidences for claiming that KLA is named terror organization. See discussion page of Kosovo ariticle. Please, do stop. It leads nowhere. -- Manojlo 18:59, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
You supplied sources which say that ONE man once said that KLA was suspected to be terrorist. You did NOT provide ANY source claiming that NOW KLA is in any list of terrorist organizations. I did report you. Your reverts are leading nowhere. You damaged the consensus we had achieved in Kosovo wiki for a long time now. Thanks a lot, and hope you taste being blocked for some time. Ilir pz 19:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Excuse the uninvited response, KLA was listed as a terrorist organisation up to 1998 by the US Department of State. However, as this is a general article about Kosovo, I think that should be reflected only in the KLA article instead. We reached an agreement on this over a month ago. Regards, -- Asterion talk to me 01:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
And don't give me Serbian sources, again. Uhh, I'm afraid I've got no idea what you're talking about. -- HolyRomanEmperor 20:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
If you think it's bad, revert it. But I don't see anything bad - Kosovo was controlled by Serbia and Metohija by Montenegro...
Thanks. That's exactly the kind of frustration I'm trying to put into words! :)) Fuck Visas too! - FrancisTyers 19:59, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
You're most welcome. I back you up in that initiative. Ilir pz 20:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
"Could you help me incorporate a field in the infobox of Prizren?"
You cannot incorporate any field into these tables if you do not incorporate that field into "Kosovo cities" template:
You should first incorporate new fields there and then into city tables which are in the articles. PANONIAN (talk) 01:14, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
The purpose of the sentence was to show that Metohija and Kosovo were reunited as Montenegro joined the Kingdom of Serbia. I'm sorry if I sound stupid, but I really didn't get what you said.
Read this drama: [ [9]] - note especially the parts connected to the Albanians. :) -- HolyRomanEmperor 17:40, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm asking you then to rephrase the sentence, because with the "conquered" and "annexed" it simply doesn't look properly written. --
HolyRomanEmperor 19:43, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Hola, HRE, I gave the explanation of both those words, and how they exactly fit the sentence. It is in Kosovo talk page if you can find it there. Ilir pz 19:48, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
The current "Kosovo were" is grammatically incorrect. Additionally, search the article for "Ottman" - it should be "Ottoman". Regards.
By the way, did you see Onamo, 'namo! like I suggested? -- HolyRomanEmperor 19:49, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm generally against creating new states - I stated that Montenegro's independence should be restored. However, Kosovo was never independent, so I can't apply my logic there. -- HolyRomanEmperor 21:12, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey no problem if you use the code. Only if it is not directly pro-Serb. Kosovo should be its own nation. Kseferovic 21:32, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Well, you can't expect them to change their national anthem just because it's historical; it would lose it's singing power ;) Also, I didn't know that Ulcinj was a part of Albania - when was it? -- HolyRomanEmperor 21:44, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
But you must understand me - I live for the day that there are no political boundries within Europe and that there is only one nationality in it - European and one currency - Euro. -- HolyRomanEmperor 21:49, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
...but Ulcinj wasn't a part of Albania before 1878, was it? -- HolyRomanEmperor 22:08, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Well, like all the rest, it was a part of the Ottoman empire, but Shkodra/Skadar villayet. 22:14, 28 April 2006 (UTC)~
But that's not Albania... -- HolyRomanEmperor 22:27, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Albania was divided in several vilayets, and Skadar/Shkodra vilayet was one of them :) Ilir pz 22:45, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Read the 1918 Montenegrin referendum for joining Serbia. As you see, the Albanians got to vote 3 and others only 2. -- HolyRomanEmperor 22:36, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
The links self-evidently don't work when they are coloured red. See link [12]. The "Battle of Kosova" is one of many examples. I agree with the changes Int19h made and his explanied reason for doing so. Best wishes phildav76 08:43, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
sorry, but wasnt clear the thing above.Ilir pz 22:45, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
? What was confusing? Сваки Округ је бирао по два капетана за Велику Народну Скупштину Српског Народа у Црној Гори 1918 године. Али, у ново-освојеним територијама, добијеним након Балканскога рата - области гдје су Албанци чинили већину - сваки Срез (јединица Округа) је бирао по три Капетана.
Also, the same is with the flags. This is how the Montenegrin national flag looks like:
and this is the state flag:
... as you can see, it's divided just like the athem. -- HolyRomanEmperor 09:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
[13] Ilir pz 09:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
What excludes the four Betas? Sorry, I didn't catch what you meant... -- HolyRomanEmperor 10:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
The purpose was to show how they treated new citizens of their Kingdom - with special privilages. :) Until they get used to living there. -- HolyRomanEmperor 11:56, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Not a single source is found in Serbian history textbooks - in fact, they don't even contain anything about Kosovo. What percisely do you no agree with?
P. S. Why didn't you answer me last questions? -- HolyRomanEmperor 16:05, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
^ a b c ISBN 86-17-09287-4: Kosta Nikolić, Nikola Žutić, Momčilo Pavlović, Zorica Špadijer: Историја за трећи разред гимназије природно-математичког смера и четврти разред гимназије општег и друштвено-језичког смера, Belgrade, 2002, pg. 182
Please, what sources can travel records of some Serbian guy be, or history of a high school in Serbian, Politika magazine (the most hard-core nationalistic magazine in Serbian), or Sandra's (dis)coordination centre?!?! Please.... Ilir pz 08:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Regarding demographics of Kosovo, I do not know much about that. However, demographics is only information from the last 1991 census to the present day. Everything before that does not belong to "demographics", but to "history" or "demographic history" sections. I could help with that. Regarding the districts, I do not understand what you suggest here. I did wrote there that they existed from 1990 to 1999. That automatically also mean that they do not exist after 1999. PANONIAN (talk) 14:45, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
ehh, no. My last question was regarding the four Betas you mentioned. However, I neither understood what you meant by those references. Anyway, I'm taking a little wikibreak and self-blocking my account, so would you be kind if we moved and discussed to my talk page? That would be very kind of you. Regards and let me hear from you! -- HolyRomanEmperor 15:02, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ilir. I see you have your hands-full. I answered to you in my talk page. My advice to you, try to ignore some comments, not worth fighting against. Might be better. don't you agree with what I say? spare yourself of trouble. try to explain to whomever understand, who doesn't just ignore. Would love to help, but having health problems. Leshkuq 00:32, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Let the Holy play his game Holy puting oil in fire. Watch out. PANONIA hase right the best solution is to do like with Georgia See User talk:Hipi Zhdripi#Kosovo stub. The only problem is that in that part of the earth they dont have UN. But we must finde the compromise to finde the solution for this argument too. Dont loste your time with Holy and Manjolo account, they are not interesting to work and present the articl how it must. Make with PANONIA in the discussion side a work place for each articel and after they are finisht you two are going to prezent at the articel side. If the holy and Manjolo mix they nois ther then you two must make a project West Balkan and nobody can destroyed your work. Let Holy to be Manjolo and Manjolo to be Holy. Ignor they me too.
At first you two must re-construt the Kosovo-geo-stub. I dont know here in en:Wiki how and who is respocibel for this. Please finde out wher is and start to make the geo-stubs
After that we need a new templare abot the 30 komuna.
After that you two must corporet with the peopel wich are resposebel about the Categorys and select they.
The cultur articel wich belong to the serbians kosovars, please lete under the direct category of Serbia. That is Respect for the church, not for the nationalist. During this time Im going to make the multicipaty map from year 2006-- Zhdripi Hipi 03:27, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.
Hello, Ilir pz, and
welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for
your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 14:13, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Please forgive me, Asterion, I will not repeat my mistake again :)))) Ilir pz 00:29, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Your opinion would be appriciated here regarding deletion of the article Serbophobia. Thanks -- Dado 20:18, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Ilir, do you actually believe in what you are writing on the Kosovo page? Gianni ita 21:55, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
No comments to you anymore.I don't like your cynism! Ilir pz 13:17, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
How do you explain Albanians? a migrating gypsy nation from Azerbaijan who fought under Adolf Hitler, later under Soviet influence. Are not Albanians people who side with the best? you know like those people who suck dick to stay alive. Now they claim Serbian, Greek and Macedonian (Greek) lands, whilst Greeks were in the Balkans at least 4000 years, and Albania never existed. Greek feed your children, but you not humans, your sub-human animals that side with the winning side, a country with no history, no national heroes, except you steal other countries history and proclaim its your ancestors the "Illyrians", which is complete bullshit like Hitler's Aryan race. Anyways get a life, all Islam-o-fascists will be wiped out from Europe, sorry EUROPE DOES NOT WANT ISLAM.
Thanks for uploading Image:Citys_of_Kosova1.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Why did you ask in the first place? -- HolyRomanEmperor 16:45, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Så du kan norska, vad roligt! :) Tyvärr må jag säga att det är ganska tråkigt när du skriker och gapar att jag vandaliserar och borde blockas. Jag tror inte du förstår vad vandalism är för jag är neutral tillskillnad från dig. Har jag någonsin sagt eller hotat med att ”stoppa dig” så som du hotat mig? Tillskillnad från dig så vet jag att alla är välkomna på wikipedia så länge man följer NPOV regeln. Det är så patetiskt att du hänvisar mig till serbiska wikipedia bara för att jag bidrar med saker som inte går väl i hand med din fantasi verklighet. Du säger att du försvarar ditt land men du skadar det bara genom att förneka saker. Nationalism och extremism är inte rätt, någonsin. Ingen bryr sig om att diskutera mina saker på diskussions sidan, alla bara bråkar, så varför ska jag bry mig om att skriva där först. Nu har jag förklarat mig nog för dig. Jag lovar dig också att jag ALDRIG kommer låta extremismen vinna! Jag har också gott om tid att vara på Wikipedia så du kan inte skrämma mig med att säga att du aldrig kan stoppas. :) Så det vore väldigt uppskattat om du blev mer öppensinnad och inte bedrev någon mera extremism. Tack! :) Litany
Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Šar mountain. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Dijxtra 20:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
OK, but what provocative messages you meant? -- HolyRomanEmperor 15:55, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
I feel sorry for all Albanians in Kosovo, too bad they don't have their own country... Oh, wait, yes they do, it's called Albania. Why do you seek to create a Greater Albania, and call the Serbs nationalist? Why can't you live happily in Serbia, with your own president, parliament and autonomy? Is living in Serbia so bad? Compate Priština to Belgrade. Which city looks better/richer? Do you have any idea how much Serbian money goes into Kosovo each year? Why independence? And please, don't tell me "well, because Serb forces ethnically cleansed Albanians in Kosovo in 1998 and 1999", Kosovars have been pushing for independence since 1981, and the intention of Serb forces was to eliminate separatists.
You might get your independence one day, but you should never be proud of the way you got it. The world wants Kosovo to be independent so they can use your resources, all factories will be privatized, and Kosovars will be more poor than ever. This is not about Serbian nationalism, the issue is much larger in scope. I don't care about the Wikipedia article anymore, what frightens me is how there are a lot of people willing to become slaves of Western powers, and aren't educated enough to understand the basic principles of totalitarianism and globalization. That's why Serbia suffered bombings and world isolation, for not wanting to become "just like everyone else". Sadly, Kosovo will probably become just like India, Pakistan, Algeria, and all the other nations that separated from larger countries, and lived through hell, before they could be called "developing countries". -- Serbiana ₪ 02:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I expected you wouldn't comment. Keep dreaming of your Kosova... -- Serbiana ₪ 08:52, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Mos i shaj këta idiotat se mujnë me ta bo block. Shitu ma car, fol me fakte. Aeternus 18:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
You are in danger of being blocked for violating the 3-revert rule. -- Serbiana ₪ 00:43, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I wouldn't have to revert anything, if you didn't revert my every attempt to make an article more neutral. -- Serbiana ₪ 08:08, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Yes, I think it is very obvious. I told you several times that we should discuss an issue, and you just reply with "dream on", "my loving country Kosova" and now "no comment". Mark my words, you will be blocked one day, when you least expect it. -- Serbiana ₪ 08:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's Neutral point of view policy, if you haven't already. It basically states that an article should include all sides of an issue, no matter how ridiculous you perceive them to be. Your edits made to the Kosovo article were not neutral, such as your changes done to the History section. Take a look at the Panchen Lama page for example - it lists the Tibetan one and the one appointed by the Chinese government. Many people (including myself) know that the Tibetan one is the only "real one", but to be neutral we have to include (what many see) as the fake one. After all, Tibet is in China. You see what I'm saying?
I hope you do, and that in the future we can work together to improve and help Wikipedia. -- Khoikhoi 09:02, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Ilir, Khoikhoi is making a general point, and you are not getting it! You are pushing your own agenda without consideration for others. You have to look at every issue from a neutral point of view. Concerning the article about Agim Ceku, you repeatedly deleted the sentence where it says that he was indicted for war crimes by the Serbian gov't because you think its irrelevant. You can't just say that everything you write is neutral, when so many people are complaining, and only the Albanians are supporting you. Open your eyes. -- Serbiana ₪ 09:21, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I agree, and I've told Ilir many times that we should cooperate in making the article more NPOV, and his his replies were "Very funny", "blla blla blla" and his famous quote - "Your edits will be reverted. You are nobody to decide which is more NPOV version.". So, how can I continue working with this guy if he continues to ignore me and my edits? -- Serbiana ₪ 09:33, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Is there anything that's not true in what I've said? There really is a country called Albania. Serb forces really did have orders to eliminate separatists. "Keep dreaming of your Kosova" was a response to you saying "Keep dreaming" when I mentioned that Kosovo is a part of Serbia, which it really is. So, what was your point when you were writing my quotes? -- Serbiana ₪ 09:47, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry for your loss. I hope the soldiers who did that will be brought to justice one day and brutaly punished fro what they did. OK, as much as I hate to admit it, Serbs did commit terrible crimes in Kosovo, but wether it was organized from Belgrade or not, is not known. But we are not discussing that, we are discussing how you're looking at the situation from one side. Why did the soldiers do that? Did the Serbian gov't just say "Hey, lets go kill Albanians in Kosovo for no damn reason..."? -- Serbiana ₪ 10:01, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
I don't think all Albanians are terrorists, you can't just make an assumption like that. One of my best friends is an Albanian who lives in Germany, I'm still in touch with him. Nothing is just black and white, right and wrong. You must look at everything from both sides, at least in this encyclopaedia. -- Serbiana ₪ 09:36, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
What you're saying is partly true. I don't live in Serbia anymore, and most of my friends used to refer to Albanians as filthy, ugly people. I agree that some Serb forces ethnically cleansed Albanians from Kosovo, and yes, it may have been mass organized. And I wouldn't have anything against that information to be in the article. But, not to mention that Serbs were cleansed as well, makes me mad. I would never apologize for anything that soldiers did in Kosovo, because I personally don't feel responsible, since my parents always voted against Milosevic. This agruement can go on 4ever. Lets stop fighting and seriously think of a way to improve the Kosovo-related articles. 1st step - Do you recognize that Kosovo is a part of Serbia under UN control? (Yes or No) -- Serbiana ₪ 09:57, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Until its status is defined, it is not a part of any country. Indications show that will not be the case in the future as well. Read Contact group statement number 6: The Contact Group Guiding Principles of November 2005 make clear that there should be: no return of Kosovo to the pre-1999 situation, no partition of Kosovo, and no union of Kosovo with any or part of another country.
I am for referring to the official authority in Kosova as of now. Else, I will have to revert the changes you and others make, which are speaking with the language of the previous regime in Kosova. Thank you, Ilir pz 10:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Then we have nothing else to discuss. -- Serbiana ₪ 10:07, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ilir, This is a note I sent to a number of Croatian editors, but I feel that it might be of interest to you as the user in question has already been active on pages related to Kosova.
Regards EurowikiJ 13:21, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Ilir, të kam regjistruar në kategorinë "Wikipedians in Kosovo". Ja, shikoje: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedians_in_Kosovo Thirri edhe shokët e tu kosovarë që të regjistrohen këtu, sepse vetëm kështu mund të bëhemi bashkë kundër okupatorit. Aeternus 15:47, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
You made personal attacks or near-personal attacks here, here, twice here, some more on the Kosovo and Priština articles.
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy: There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be blocked for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thanks, -- HolyRomanEmperor 22:46, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
This is your last warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. Thank yous -- HolyRomanEmperor 22:46, 4 April 2006 (UTC)--
Please understand, Wikipedia has Serb editors and Croat editors and Slovene editors and Bosniak editors and Kosovar editors and Guatemalan editors and Paraguayan editors and Danish editors and Rwandan editors and editors who are in the scientific camps in Antarctica.
You - all of you - must learn to get along with each other. This is not a battleground; it is an encyclopedia. The truly violent people aren't here. If angry people cannot learn to control their tempers - despite how justified that anger may (or may not) be - then they will be blocked from editing.
Removing the warnings from your talk page goes against protocol, as it could be interpreted that you are attempting to deceive the administrators into thinking you have not committed any previous infractions. DS 01:10, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
OK, Ilir, the comment above makes sense... Kosovo is governed by the United Nations, and it's status is unresolved. I won't push for the "Kosovo is a part of Serbia" anymore... This bickering is leading nowhere, and I've decided to just let go of some opinions that have been probably subliminaly engraved in my head by the previous Serb government. Let's forget about what was in the past, and look forward to a better future where, hopefully, Albanians and Serbians can live together in peace. Will you forgive me for being an ass? -- Serbiana ₪ 01:48, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
...do anything if you keep it up this way... -- HolyRomanEmperor 19:39, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
You made a note that I made personal attacks on my talk page, but without references to where I did that. Please also see, when regarding your controversal user page Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point.
Note that I am intent on removing your post from my talk page, because you simply didn't source it. Strangely, you put it after my warning for your continuous personal attacks against the Wikipedian Community, so this can only be interpreted as a frustrating revenge.
A osht shka qyky HolyRomanEmperor-i a? Nëse po, vetëm tregom, ja tregoj unë atij se ku e ka vendin! Aeternus 16:33, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Nimoma pakes mos po gabojë: Template talk:Districts of Serbia-- Hipi Zhdripi 19:00, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Të lutem, të lutem për korigjoj gabimet gjuhësore këtë fleten -- Hipi Zhdripi 23:14, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
First of all, I am not Serbian. Second of all, please point out why would someone consider that? I never used words like Serbian fascists or similiar (unlike you, my friend). I've never had issues with Albanians, two wiki-Albanians (one contributing to the Serbian wikipedia) are my best wiki-companions, and the first time that I have problems is with you. Hopefully, this is just a temporary misunderstanding, chump. :) If you find any offense whatsoever, please point it out to me so that I can correct errors. My non-contributing work? I greatly expanded the article and repairded unendigly bad grammar. You, on the other hand, keep fighting a revert war against the Wikipedia Community restoring the age-old inconsistent version of the article. And the article's name's not Kosova, but Kosovo. This is not an insult (as you may have understood my every single word), but a note to the name of the article. -- HolyRomanEmperor 23:40, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Yes, I know that he was labelled that way; but hey, after the Yugoslav Wars, Slobodan Milosevic was Man of the Year according to New York Times and even a Nobel Prize of Peace candidate suggested by the British government. The UN Chancellorship decided to give him a seat in the UN office for his work. But remember what is Milosevic? The greatest criminal of modern Europe... -- HolyRomanEmperor 19:00, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I wasn't aware that that anon was you. I'm going to stay away from that page, and most Balkan-related articles for that matter - I'm trying to not get myself involved in more controversies. -- Khoikhoi 23:26, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
I hope you really have changed attitued but the templates on your user page may talk for it self. I can guarantee you too that I will continue fight against extremism, of any kind. I hope you understand that the Albanian extremism you are contributing with are not any better than the Serbian others are contributing or any extremism at all. Do you find me a serious threat just because I not support extrem nationalism? I must revert the Kosovo page sadly since you delete very important information but I agree with you on other things about the page. See Talk:Kosovo for explanations. You have previously not answeared my reply on your talk page nor on the Kosovo talk page. I hope we could work something out as always. There is no news about that. My best, Litany
History for Litany As you mentioned you are interested in history, maybe you find it useful to check this article or book [3]. Regards, Ilir pz 10:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the link to the article. It's always useful, but I've allready taken part of this one. Litany
A e ngon ti John Lennon-in a? Aeternus 18:59, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
See: Talk:Serbia -- Hipi Zhdripi 19:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 21:06, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I can't remember fighting a war against you. ;) I only made several additions to the history, and reverted three times to my version since you restored the broken version. I said that I took you for a vandal, because you only said "Nazi-like Serbian propaganda" and kept change the to teh, adding false arguements in the history like Nemanja's Croatdom and other total nonsences. How did you think I would characterize your edits? Ofcourse, I will take a part of responsibility in the misunderstanding, naturaly.
You didn't understand my comments? You said: Nice barnstars you're exchanging with Asterion. You will note that I haven't given him any barnstar, how're we exchanging then? Then you said: Is that Arkan's emblem or it only seems like? Arkan is a murderous thug that executed a bunch of my friends and family, and is a xenophobic hater of everything that my (recent, don't ask ;) kin/people stands for. I understood that you not only like Albanian criminals, but also Serbian/Yugoslav? That post seemed like all you care about are killers. What did Nebeski narod? mean?
About the Milosevic part, well; the entire world in the first half of the 1990s recognized him as the peacekeeper of the century, and yet he is the greatest bad-guy of modern Europe. You also said that Agin Ceku was rated by someone (I was drawing a parallel). Note, that Ceku said that he cannot guarrantee the status of Serbs if Kosovo doesn't get its independence. So, if Kosovo doesn't get its independence, the Serbs are doomed, and if Kosovo becomes independent, they're surely done for. What kind of a Premier is that, threating (note, that is a threat) the World? I thought that only Miloshevich had the guts to go that far too much.
I would gladly continue the discussion, but here, on your talk page, instead. Now, I'm all ears, my friend. :) -- HolyRomanEmperor 21:45, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Prishtina.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are
open content,
public domain, and
fair use. Find the appropriate template in
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 01:20, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Skenderbeuinprishtina.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are
open content,
public domain, and
fair use. Find the appropriate template in
Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 01:21, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Futa njo që e ki bo vetë dhe që nuk është i lejuar ndryshimi.-- Hipi Zhdripi 23:19, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Hello Ilir! I invite you to join the WikiProject Serbia. I'd really appreciate it if you joined us :) All the best, -- serbiana - talk 04:07, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
I really have no idea what nebeski narod stands for. Where you reffering to some mentions of Serbs being a Heaven People? :)))) I've heard this; but only from one Serb (out of 10 million) and he lives in a mental institution...
I might add that I lost my (only) sister...
Agin might not've threatened the world, but he sure did make a threat. Please just read what he said. If Kosovo doesn't get it's independence, I cannot guarrantee the rights of Serbs. That means that Kosovo must be independent, whether anyone (including the whole Kosovar people) liked it or not. How's that not a threat? Anyway, I already pointed out to you the many mischiefs that Agin Ceku did, so his word simply cannot be trusted. Can we trust the words of Milosevic?
Rugova was not the only peaceful man. I refresh your memory, he always won the majority of votes. So we are talking about the majority of Kosovars, right? Who are you referring to as Albanian terrorism? Which independent court accussed the above three that you mentioned as terrorists?? Ilir pz 21:49, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
However, I simply disagree that there is future for the ethnic Serbs on Kosovo. Either way, the Serbs are going to pass badly and so are the 1,000-year old Monasteries. It's simply done. Milosevic fused (Greater) Albanian nationalism by killing 9,000-10,000 Albanians and evicting over 700,000. This resulted in 1,000-2,000 dead Serbs and over 100,000 Serbian refugees altogether. After 1999, the situation got worse, as 300,000 (the majority being Serbs) were practicly ethnicly cleansed by the Albanian paramilitary forces. Remember the 2004 March Pogrom? 156 Orthodox Churches and Monasteries were destroyed, the most magnificent of the surely the Monastery of Saint Archangel from Prizren from the 14th century or Our Lady of Ljevis also in the vicinity from the 12th century.
P. S. Oh, and I just viewed the entire history of Kosovo. I only reverted your edits twice, both of the time when you restored mass inconsistencies, grammar errors, self-contradictory facts and broken links... and both were very long ago, with a very wide time-gap. So, where's this you keep reverting? :) -- HolyRomanEmperor 14:16, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
I would wonder and treat carefully why you gave him a star... Please see Hipi Zhdripi. He has been conducting anti-Albanian propaganda by removing the Albanian naming of the entire entity and its capital city, rm the official Albanian language as well as the Heads of the Transitory Government and the Transitory State; removed altogether the Albanians from the population and simply deleted the entire explaination on the controversy.
Hehe I assume that was a mistake, or he was ironic. If not, I would also be surprised he added that. :))))) I added a suggestion to proceed further in the Kosovo article, before it is late and this revert-war goes on forever, and people dont feel like stopping anymore. Hope you agree with it, as you are one of the most active there. The star I awarded him for being so persistent in trying to make his point and trying to explain with his limited language abilities. His efforts I awared, but ...hmm...after that last edit, not sure :)))) Ilir pz 22:33, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Posto si ziveo jedno vreme u Beogradu, nadam se da ces ovde glasati za Article Improvement Drive, pa da Beograd bude izabrani clanak. I would appreciate your vote. -- serbiana - talk 03:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Ma mirë me shkru të thyme. Qysh po doket asgjë nuk po shijhet që ky ashtë hipi e zhdripi. haha. Po tasht qysh tasht duhet me dite qe kta e marin edhe ne gjuht tjera. Nuk asht ne pytje vetem anglisht po ele ne tjerat.-- Hipi Zhdripi 18:19, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
You are wilkommen in Wikipedia:WikiProject Dardania-- Hipi Zhdripi 20:24, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Hipi po donë mu bo Zhdripi po une në anglish nuk di me shkru Zhdripi. Po jam i sigur se ti munesh shum ma mirë se une. Për qita ish kon mirë me u lajmëru te guri i muhalles-- Hipi Zhdripi 03:51, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Aeternus 14:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
In your last edits, you have marked the changes as a minor edit. This is not right. A minor edit generally implies trivial changes only, such as typo corrections, formatting and presentational changes and rearranging of text without changing any content. Therefore, any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it involves one word. The distinction between major and minor edits is significant because you may decide to ignore minor edits when viewing recent changes; logged-in users can even set their preferences to not display them. No one wants to be fooled into ignoring a significant change to an article simply because it was marked "minor." So remember to consider the opinions of other editors when choosing this option. Asterion 22:32, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
Following your recent edit,
I'd like to remind you to be civil and to not form personal attacks or edit wars through your or others' comments; doing so will only cause tension and annoyance.
Regards, Asterion 23:30, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
You said "Ilir pz, you are confusing me. You are also avoiding my questions and advices. Of course the split of Yugoslavia whould have been like the one between Sweden and Norway. I can tell you that Wikipedia is NOT for PERSONAL OPINIONS. Therfor I will not answear your question whenever I want to see a Independant Repubulic of Kosova, or if Kosovo and Methoija should stay within the Union of SCG. It woulden't change my opinions on anything if they whould be independant or if they would stay. The most important is the best for the people and to keep the culture heritage of all peoples. If you want to know a very good reason why the question about Kosovos independance should be on the hold? More areas like, western Macedonia, Sandzak and Republika Srpska could strive for independance and this whould only be more unstable for the whole region and maybe in the worst case produce more wars. My opinion is baised that education, democracy and finacial investments are the only way for Kosovo and the rest of Balkan to be a peaceful part of Europe. From now on I will answear on your talk page, since we are commited to two discussions with the same topics. Best regards Litany"
First, I would like to warn you to try to work out with Asterion. I know that you two are a little on edge, but please try to find a common language. The Greeks are of high respect on wiki, and francly, as much as I am ashamed to admit, if any third party arrives, they will most likely choose a Greek over an Albanian (or Macedonian, or Bulgarian, Turk or alike). -- HolyRomanEmperor 11:38, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Second of all, when the governments of the Republics of Montenegro and Serbia met, deciding the future status of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, Serbia's Premier had argued that he will accept all terms that Montenegro's government desires, except for renaming the country; while on the other hand, Montenegro's President argued that that in fact is the only things that bugs him. He suggested "State Union of Serbia and Montenegro". This worried Koshtunica and the others, so they invited several UN officials as mediators. The UN (lesser, though) official was surprised that they even though that and considered that the Yugoslav governments was trying to openly spit on the Albanian politicians of Kosovo. He asked the government How long will you think that Albanian politicians are stupid? Ofcourse the renaming will not affect the 1244 resolution!"
You might also view this BBC report (regarding the Church matters): Morto i Serbi She wrote that exactly on the ruins of that age-old Church. And she's a young girl.What do you think the other wil...? -- HolyRomanEmperor 11:47, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
And here you can see it while its burning. -- HolyRomanEmperor 11:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Asterion 11:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
this Human Rights Watch contains the most detailed list of the 2004 Pogrom.
More from BBC about the burnt Churches and the most interesting are these: Krystallnacht and Albanians posed as Serbs to stoke ethnic fires in Kosovo.
Suffice to say; when a British sees five Balkan men: a Serb, a Croat, a Greek, an Albanian and a Bulgarian. And all five give different versions. What I meant to say is that they will automaticly discard the non-Greeks and vouch the Greek version as the real one. That's what I mean. I was warning you that the Greek wikipedians are of high respect on wiki, and they are the only ones who are in the European Union and the NATO, as well as they didn't fight any wars. You would be wondered what I hear on Chat: dirty and stupid Serbs; they're both entirely fault for screwing up the Balkans and similiar, sorry for the usage of obscure language, but I was trully quoting...
You mentioned Bosnians. Didn't you mean Bosniaks? And not Kostunica and the Montenegrin government, but the FRJ and the UN. The man that was saying that was a UN official and the UN is, as I believe, the governing body of the Kosovo Province.
I explained the Serbian/Albanian. First one order at the beginning of the article and then the other at the other place to satisfy all sides. I apologized to you for the revert, but please see my facts on Talk:Kosovo. All the best (trully, I mean this; no matter how much we disagree, you can always count on me to back you up, my friend :). -- HolyRomanEmperor 18:08, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
This situation with the Montenegrin people is really complicated. Historically, Montenegrins were ethnic Serbs, and currently, most view themselves as Serbs in the cultural-linguistic-religious manor (Serbian Orthodox Church, Serbian language, Serbian Culture and Tradition). With regards, Serbia purged itself from Criminals of the old 1990s by the end of 2000. However, the currect Montenegro's President is the same man that stood outside the siege of Dubrovnik, that followed Arkan to Prizren; that dispatched war parties to Vukovar and Sarajevo. So is the Montenegrin Premier. Additionally, they were Miloshevich's greatest buddies. The only reason for Montenegro's independence is to save the government from prison (Italy is prosecuting Milo Djukanovic for a long time for smuggling cigarettes and weaponry) and to create Montenegro into a Criminal Haven. The problem is that the Goverment is incredibly wealthy, as they are War Profiteers from the Yugoslav Wars, and they never answered for their deeds. Practicly, not even 20% of Montenegro's citizens are ethnic Montenegrins in the real sence of the word, while over 70% are Serbs, either by nationality or other. The current government of Montenegro is in the likehood of Milosevic's regime and is practicly occupied the state and the people. That's why, the referendum is destined to fail. Polls say that there's a 70% chance that M will stay in the union and not even 40% of the population have voted for independence on the test-voting. -- HolyRomanEmperor 18:24, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Shiko të lutem mos po na vandalizojin Serbin e po e shkatrrojin artikullin, po menoj harten e Serbis dhe Malit të Zi në atë artikull. Dhe artikulli Prizren Party duhet zgjeruar dhe duhet shkuar se ai është bërë tradicional dhe festohet nga qytetarët e Prizrenit së bashku me ushtarët e KFORIT. Duhet me përkthye edhe tekstin e ftesës në anglish unë nuk po di.
Teksti i fotografisë gjendet i shënuar kur të shikon redaktimin:
-- Hipi Zhdripi 02:45, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Backing you up by encouraging you not to give up whatever you plan on doing and spreading good words to other wikipedians, naturally. I think that User:Hipi Zhdripi has really gone too far. Look what he wrote at User_talk:PANONIAN or User_talk:The_Minister_of_War]]. Then take a look at the history of my User Page. He's really going to far, I think that a full-scale block from wikipedia might be the only solution.
But why did you mean Citizen of Bosnia? The Serbs (largest nation of BiH) wanted to live with Serbia; Bosniaks (most numerious group) wanted independence and Croats wanted to live with Croatia. That's why the war interrupted in the first place, so I assumped that you could only mean Bosniaks.
What do you think about the Montenegrins issue (my comments)? -- HolyRomanEmperor 19:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Oh, I forgot a thingy: on Talk:Kosovo you said: That would help me know as well. That is all. 165 seems to me to be a biased number. There aren't that many churches in total, including the Roman Catholic ones I think.
Well, the problem is that those 165 were only a fragment of the Orthodox Serb Churches and Monasteries on Kosovo. Too bad that those 165 included those 8 centuries old. Just before the arrival of the Ottoman Turks, there were around 1,300 on Kosovo alone. Islam and most-recent Albanian military movements (you must admit) have teared down that number, you must admit. For if not, today Kosovo would be the largest concentration of Orthodox Christianity on Earth (like it was). I think that if we count all the ruins of Churches and Monasteries since then, we would have at least by a half more than 1,300. Sincerely yours. -- HolyRomanEmperor 09:33, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Unë kohëve të fundit po jom shumë i nxonun me obligime jashtë-kompjuterike, kështu që s'po muj me kontribu shumë. Por, duhesh gjithsesi mi kontaktu rrjetën. Kta jon profesionista edhe kishin mujt me na ndihmu teper. Informacionet tjera i gjen atje... Aeternus 16:05, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
sure we can talk here not in HRE's talk page. You said: "Good if I provide you with it. ;) And yes I have. Maybe you only see what you wanna see? I've re-written alot of edits from people with only IP numbers, claiming that the country is called Kosovo i Methoija, etc. BTW why not answearing what I wrote to you on your talk page? Litany"
hehehe yes, you made my day, thanks a lot. check what you reverted "the country is called Kosovo i Methoija" hehehehehehe. I really thank you. Have a nice day! Ilir pz 16:50, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
I think that Asterion's being a little rough on you. But then again, I can understand his attitude, and I believe that so can you. Did you notice how I keep staying cool and sweattalk to you? That's because you didn't say Somebody ban HRE vandal!!! for a few hundred times like you did in Asterion's case. Although, you have changed and I wish that Asterion could see that too. I'll note it on his talk page. I only wish that you try to be nice to him that you can work it out together.
P. S. You stopped talking at the talk page. -- HolyRomanEmperor 19:36, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Hello Ilir - you wrote: Hello Mr. Dignan. I recently noticed your contributions to the stub issues related to all cities and locations of Kosovo. I am not sure your contributions would calm down the tension that already exists between the parties involved in the dispute. As much as I respect your professionalism, and your determination to comply to the Wiki rules, I would encourage you to think of compromising solutions when dealing with sensitive topics. As far as stub issue is concerned, for the topic I am addressing, I would suggest you initiate a "stub" modification for disputed territories, and not instead fuel up the tensions by following some rules, which are temporary always.
See: Talk:Federal Republic of Yugoslavia-- Hipi Zhdripi 17:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Too bad that you voted neutral, I thought that you object nothin'... Could you presicely say why you objected?
Well, I'm keeping matters strictly proffessional. There is a 60% chance that they are the same user, and 40% chance that they're not, which makes me right in both cases :))) -- HolyRomanEmperor 11:39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Ilir, lirisht kërkoju ndihmë atyre, sepse nëse ata vet nuk e bëjnë, i thonë dikujt tjetër që ta bën. -- Aeternus 14:40, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Ilir provoje ta kriosh një projekt së bashku me PANONIN ashtu që të gjeni një zgjidhje për gjitha artikujt. (transletit, is not correct but it mean the same) Pleace trai to make a project with PANONIA to presant the both sei of Kosovo. I m going to trai to be neutral and support you two. Hipi
I changed templates on the Kosovo cities articles: removed reference to car plates since you said that all have the same, and changed "coat of arms" with "flag". Ok now? PANONIAN (talk) 19:49, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
I have upload it at wiki commons. You can see there are 29 maps. the mape of Malisheva is not there beacose the order of this komun are not difenedet. In fackt this is in the Law. There are many new under (subdivisions) livel of this komuns but they must be pasentit as part of this komuns wich are in this time present. Dragash is now in two divesions (Dragashi and Opoja ? ) but in the livel of Kosovo they are one komune. Tung from vandal rebel Hipi.
Ups!!! The names in albanian L. are officel (atention! the extremes kosovars wont to use the new name). If you two needs somthing abou the images call me [6].
See:
Hipi just wrote there that Kosovo cities does not have flags. He showed me this link from Albanian Wikipedia where city have coat of arms:
Should we restore part of the tables where is written coat of arms instead of flag? PANONIAN (talk) 14:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Just letting you know that you voted twice at this RFA. I have striked you're original vote and kept the second vote and your decision. Moe ε 00:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I have not forgotten about the article :). I was just giving it time so that other users would get a chance to express their view on my proposal, since I'd prefer to act with consensus. However, if no one posts there within the next few hours, I will go ahead with the unprotection. It will happen today. Thanks for the reminder, though. Redux 16:19, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ilir, Why do you object so much to having Kosovo listed as what it is, a province of Serbia under UN administration? I have given you the facts and the sources and you have still been unable to provide a single one. I already explained you that an encyclopaedia is not a matter of personal preferences. As far as everyone is concerned, Kosovo is still part of Serbia and we need to show this as it is. Whatever happens next, wikipedia will reflect the changes, but at this point, you cannot simply call it a "territory" as this factually incorrect. Quoting from the UN website: "...Within Serbia there are two semi-autonomous provinces, Vojvodina (21,506 km2) in the north and Kosovo and Metohija (10,887 km2) in the south.". I could go on but you already know all this anyway. -- Asterion talk to me 20:58, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
I have transferred discusion about Kosovo page from my personal to Kosovo talk page. Discussion is not personal, so it belongs there. If you have something personaly to say to me, please feell invited on my talk page. -- Manojlo 16:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Discussion was partly personal, as YOU removed and added content according to your wishes. Well, keep removing them from your talk page, show your manners. 16:43, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for protecting it from Manojlo! (the Kosovo article) -- HolyRomanEmperor 16:56, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Also, I added the "Metohijas" to resemble the Communist Yugoslavia period. The official name was (short) SAP KOSMET; and the shorter version was Социјалистичка Аутономна Покрајина Косово и Метохија. Why not call it by the then-offical name? -- HolyRomanEmperor 17:28, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
I will be obliged to report your reverting. I supplied more than enough relevant evidences for claiming that KLA is named terror organization. See discussion page of Kosovo ariticle. Please, do stop. It leads nowhere. -- Manojlo 18:59, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
You supplied sources which say that ONE man once said that KLA was suspected to be terrorist. You did NOT provide ANY source claiming that NOW KLA is in any list of terrorist organizations. I did report you. Your reverts are leading nowhere. You damaged the consensus we had achieved in Kosovo wiki for a long time now. Thanks a lot, and hope you taste being blocked for some time. Ilir pz 19:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Excuse the uninvited response, KLA was listed as a terrorist organisation up to 1998 by the US Department of State. However, as this is a general article about Kosovo, I think that should be reflected only in the KLA article instead. We reached an agreement on this over a month ago. Regards, -- Asterion talk to me 01:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
And don't give me Serbian sources, again. Uhh, I'm afraid I've got no idea what you're talking about. -- HolyRomanEmperor 20:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
If you think it's bad, revert it. But I don't see anything bad - Kosovo was controlled by Serbia and Metohija by Montenegro...
Thanks. That's exactly the kind of frustration I'm trying to put into words! :)) Fuck Visas too! - FrancisTyers 19:59, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
You're most welcome. I back you up in that initiative. Ilir pz 20:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
"Could you help me incorporate a field in the infobox of Prizren?"
You cannot incorporate any field into these tables if you do not incorporate that field into "Kosovo cities" template:
You should first incorporate new fields there and then into city tables which are in the articles. PANONIAN (talk) 01:14, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
The purpose of the sentence was to show that Metohija and Kosovo were reunited as Montenegro joined the Kingdom of Serbia. I'm sorry if I sound stupid, but I really didn't get what you said.
Read this drama: [ [9]] - note especially the parts connected to the Albanians. :) -- HolyRomanEmperor 17:40, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm asking you then to rephrase the sentence, because with the "conquered" and "annexed" it simply doesn't look properly written. --
HolyRomanEmperor 19:43, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Hola, HRE, I gave the explanation of both those words, and how they exactly fit the sentence. It is in Kosovo talk page if you can find it there. Ilir pz 19:48, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
The current "Kosovo were" is grammatically incorrect. Additionally, search the article for "Ottman" - it should be "Ottoman". Regards.
By the way, did you see Onamo, 'namo! like I suggested? -- HolyRomanEmperor 19:49, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm generally against creating new states - I stated that Montenegro's independence should be restored. However, Kosovo was never independent, so I can't apply my logic there. -- HolyRomanEmperor 21:12, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey no problem if you use the code. Only if it is not directly pro-Serb. Kosovo should be its own nation. Kseferovic 21:32, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Well, you can't expect them to change their national anthem just because it's historical; it would lose it's singing power ;) Also, I didn't know that Ulcinj was a part of Albania - when was it? -- HolyRomanEmperor 21:44, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
But you must understand me - I live for the day that there are no political boundries within Europe and that there is only one nationality in it - European and one currency - Euro. -- HolyRomanEmperor 21:49, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
...but Ulcinj wasn't a part of Albania before 1878, was it? -- HolyRomanEmperor 22:08, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Well, like all the rest, it was a part of the Ottoman empire, but Shkodra/Skadar villayet. 22:14, 28 April 2006 (UTC)~
But that's not Albania... -- HolyRomanEmperor 22:27, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Albania was divided in several vilayets, and Skadar/Shkodra vilayet was one of them :) Ilir pz 22:45, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Read the 1918 Montenegrin referendum for joining Serbia. As you see, the Albanians got to vote 3 and others only 2. -- HolyRomanEmperor 22:36, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
The links self-evidently don't work when they are coloured red. See link [12]. The "Battle of Kosova" is one of many examples. I agree with the changes Int19h made and his explanied reason for doing so. Best wishes phildav76 08:43, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
sorry, but wasnt clear the thing above.Ilir pz 22:45, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
? What was confusing? Сваки Округ је бирао по два капетана за Велику Народну Скупштину Српског Народа у Црној Гори 1918 године. Али, у ново-освојеним територијама, добијеним након Балканскога рата - области гдје су Албанци чинили већину - сваки Срез (јединица Округа) је бирао по три Капетана.
Also, the same is with the flags. This is how the Montenegrin national flag looks like:
and this is the state flag:
... as you can see, it's divided just like the athem. -- HolyRomanEmperor 09:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
[13] Ilir pz 09:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
What excludes the four Betas? Sorry, I didn't catch what you meant... -- HolyRomanEmperor 10:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
The purpose was to show how they treated new citizens of their Kingdom - with special privilages. :) Until they get used to living there. -- HolyRomanEmperor 11:56, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Not a single source is found in Serbian history textbooks - in fact, they don't even contain anything about Kosovo. What percisely do you no agree with?
P. S. Why didn't you answer me last questions? -- HolyRomanEmperor 16:05, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
^ a b c ISBN 86-17-09287-4: Kosta Nikolić, Nikola Žutić, Momčilo Pavlović, Zorica Špadijer: Историја за трећи разред гимназије природно-математичког смера и четврти разред гимназије општег и друштвено-језичког смера, Belgrade, 2002, pg. 182
Please, what sources can travel records of some Serbian guy be, or history of a high school in Serbian, Politika magazine (the most hard-core nationalistic magazine in Serbian), or Sandra's (dis)coordination centre?!?! Please.... Ilir pz 08:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Regarding demographics of Kosovo, I do not know much about that. However, demographics is only information from the last 1991 census to the present day. Everything before that does not belong to "demographics", but to "history" or "demographic history" sections. I could help with that. Regarding the districts, I do not understand what you suggest here. I did wrote there that they existed from 1990 to 1999. That automatically also mean that they do not exist after 1999. PANONIAN (talk) 14:45, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
ehh, no. My last question was regarding the four Betas you mentioned. However, I neither understood what you meant by those references. Anyway, I'm taking a little wikibreak and self-blocking my account, so would you be kind if we moved and discussed to my talk page? That would be very kind of you. Regards and let me hear from you! -- HolyRomanEmperor 15:02, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ilir. I see you have your hands-full. I answered to you in my talk page. My advice to you, try to ignore some comments, not worth fighting against. Might be better. don't you agree with what I say? spare yourself of trouble. try to explain to whomever understand, who doesn't just ignore. Would love to help, but having health problems. Leshkuq 00:32, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Let the Holy play his game Holy puting oil in fire. Watch out. PANONIA hase right the best solution is to do like with Georgia See User talk:Hipi Zhdripi#Kosovo stub. The only problem is that in that part of the earth they dont have UN. But we must finde the compromise to finde the solution for this argument too. Dont loste your time with Holy and Manjolo account, they are not interesting to work and present the articl how it must. Make with PANONIA in the discussion side a work place for each articel and after they are finisht you two are going to prezent at the articel side. If the holy and Manjolo mix they nois ther then you two must make a project West Balkan and nobody can destroyed your work. Let Holy to be Manjolo and Manjolo to be Holy. Ignor they me too.
At first you two must re-construt the Kosovo-geo-stub. I dont know here in en:Wiki how and who is respocibel for this. Please finde out wher is and start to make the geo-stubs
After that we need a new templare abot the 30 komuna.
After that you two must corporet with the peopel wich are resposebel about the Categorys and select they.
The cultur articel wich belong to the serbians kosovars, please lete under the direct category of Serbia. That is Respect for the church, not for the nationalist. During this time Im going to make the multicipaty map from year 2006-- Zhdripi Hipi 03:27, 1 May 2006 (UTC)