This is an
essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been
thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
This page in a nutshell: Why make a red link, when you can make a stub? |
So, you just wrote a killer new article, and you see lots of red links. You're surprised, because these topics would probably satisfy the notability guidelines and Wikipedia seems to have articles on every single topic imaginable.
Instead of letting that red link sit there doing nothing: Make it a stub!
Replacing red links with stubs helps to grow the encyclopedia. Starting articles can be difficult for new users who aren't accustomed to Wikipedia's culture and policies. Give them a head start. Wikipedia is consistently in the top of Google searches, so making stubs also helps attract other editors who are familiar with that topic.
Do not feel compelled to create all these stubs on the same day. If it is a lot of work, you can do it gradually at your own pace. Remember, Wikipedia is a volunteer service and there is no deadline and no rush.
Even if you don't have the time or the inclination necessary to give that topic a full featured article-style treatment, it's okay to create a stub if you are willing to provide:
Not all words or phrases found in an article are suitable for making new articles out of in the near future or in some cases, ever. If you think the likelihood is low, consider the following:
This is an
essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been
thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
This page in a nutshell: Why make a red link, when you can make a stub? |
So, you just wrote a killer new article, and you see lots of red links. You're surprised, because these topics would probably satisfy the notability guidelines and Wikipedia seems to have articles on every single topic imaginable.
Instead of letting that red link sit there doing nothing: Make it a stub!
Replacing red links with stubs helps to grow the encyclopedia. Starting articles can be difficult for new users who aren't accustomed to Wikipedia's culture and policies. Give them a head start. Wikipedia is consistently in the top of Google searches, so making stubs also helps attract other editors who are familiar with that topic.
Do not feel compelled to create all these stubs on the same day. If it is a lot of work, you can do it gradually at your own pace. Remember, Wikipedia is a volunteer service and there is no deadline and no rush.
Even if you don't have the time or the inclination necessary to give that topic a full featured article-style treatment, it's okay to create a stub if you are willing to provide:
Not all words or phrases found in an article are suitable for making new articles out of in the near future or in some cases, ever. If you think the likelihood is low, consider the following: