Hello, IVickyChoudhary, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.   Introduction  5    The five pillars of Wikipedia   How to edit a page   Help   Tips   How to write a great article   Manual of Style   Be Bold   Assume Good faith   Get adopted

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC. You can also place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions.

Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:22, 30 July 2014 (UTC) reply

I have deleted your user page. It is intended for basic information about yourself or your Wikimedia-related activities. Although a lot of leeway is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not a personal website, blog, or social networking medium, nor should it be used to promote yourself, or host a fake article, CV, or lengthy biography.

Please don't be offended, and please feel welcome here. I encourage you to help build the encyclopedia. If there is anything you ever need, just ask. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:22, 30 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi IVickyChoudhary! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni ( I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:20, 30 July 2014 (UTC) reply

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia [Missionedit] ( talk) 18:09, 26 June 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sanjay Puran Singh Chauhan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sanjay Puran Singh Chauhan was changed by IVickyChoudhary (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.935879 on 2015-10-09T15:13:27+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 15:13, 9 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Hello71. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sanjay Puran Singh Chauhan  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ⁓ Hello 71 15:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on NewsTrend, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 27.60.96.139 ( talk) 08:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Jaipurmarathon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:35, 16 October 2019 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Banwari Lal Goswami is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banwari Lal Goswami until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PQR01 ( talk) 07:35, 5 February 2022 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Banwari Lal. Thanks! Robert McClenon ( talk) 23:58, 20 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Banwari Lal (comedian) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Banwari Lal (comedian), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Liance ^{talk/ contribs} 00:25, 21 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, IVickyChoudhary. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Banwari Lal (comedian), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 01:03, 24 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, IVickyChoudhary. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Banwari Lal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello IVickyChoudhary. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:IVickyChoudhary. The template {{ Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=IVickyChoudhary|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PICKLEDICAE🥒 23:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into No One Cares (company). This is known as a " cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, No One Cares (company), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PICKLEDICAE🥒 23:19, 1 September 2022 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on No One Cares (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:04, 2 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LordVoldemort728 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rakesh Kumar Tiwary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️ ^{Let's Talk !} 07:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Bhushan Kathuria, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:10, 16 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Thankyou, I'll make corrections as you told. IvivekChoudhary ( talk) 14:14, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

There are already 6 references from reliable sources, Please guide me about what's wrong with them? IvivekChoudhary ( talk) 14:18, 17 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NP83 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All pr content

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dev Menaria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NP83 ( talk) 19:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC) reply

It all looks genuine news, but yes that dada saheb phalke award is kinda misleading, it seems its an another non official Dada saheb award, but I checked again that guy is really working as an actor.

Ps. Don't looks like PR content, because all content is different, published on different dates and even some of them are 3-4 years old.

Looking forward for your guidance. IvivekChoudhary ( talk) 16:23, 30 April 2023 (UTC) reply

I rechekced everything, now I also its a Pr work. Will keep it mind for next time. Thankyou everyone for your lessons and suggestions. IvivekChoudhary ( talk) 12:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello IVickyChoudhary. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:IVickyChoudhary. The template {{ Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=IVickyChoudhary|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. S0091 ( talk) 16:35, 30 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Creating wiki pages is my hobby, not profession or source of income. As I earning decent from my own business. And thanks for letting me know about Articles for creation process. I'll use it as of now instead of creating articles directly. IvivekChoudhary ( talk) 16:42, 30 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for reply. You really do need to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's notability guidelines as most of the articles you have created have been deleted. Continuing to create articles of non-notable topics is considered disruptive as is creating an article after the draft has been declined. If you have questions or need help, you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 ( talk) 16:54, 30 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your kind words. I'm learning more and more nowadays. IvivekChoudhary ( talk) 07:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC) reply

I rechekced everything, now I also thinks that its a Pr work. Will keep it mind for next time. Thankyou everyone for your lessons and suggestions. IvivekChoudhary ( talk) 12:56, 4 May 2023 (UTC) reply

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) -- IvivekChoudhary ( talk) 19:24, 9 July 2023 (UTC) reply

It's my personal profile/author page, what's wrong in it? Kindly point out the mistakes, I can make provmenets.

I have declined the request for speedy deletion. The U5 criterion is intended for cases where Wikipedia is being abused as a webhost. I don't think that's the case here, although I can see the other user's concern at the mentions of your business and your social media fees. I suggest that the more time you put in working on articles in the main encyclopedia, the less concern there will be with your userpage. — C.Fred ( talk) 19:29, 9 July 2023 (UTC) reply

I clarified on those concerns that I'm not doing any commercial things or charging fees. I just tried for my own company and friend's company (that time I was not aware completly with the Wiki rules), after that I created page only of famous people. And how can I contact them for fees? It's just my hobby to contribute in public interest.

Thanks@ C.Fred IvivekChoudhary ( talk) 19:38, 9 July 2023 (UTC) reply

How can I contact them for fees?

If you are attempting to do WP:Paid editing, you need to disclose up front that you are editing for pay or on spec. — C.Fred ( talk) 20:56, 9 July 2023 (UTC) reply

But I'm not doint Paid editing, that's why asking your guidance about getting the license. IvivekChoudhary ( talk) 00:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC) reply

I am unclear what you're asking about with respect to fees or license. Are you asking about trying to get the owner of an image (or text) to release it under a free license? — C.Fred ( talk) 02:49, 13 July 2023 (UTC) reply

I'm asking about how to get license for image. IvivekChoudhary ( talk) 18:12, 13 July 2023 (UTC) reply

You would have to contact the owner of the image and ask them to release it under a free license. — C.Fred ( talk) 02:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

A lot of the sources are Times of India, which is a questionable source. Many are also mostly about his film, Kerala story, and does not really give biographical details. Many also duplicate information. That leaves these two sources: [1] [2] I don't think they are enough to establish notability for a controversial filmmaker.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sudipto Sen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 01:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the review, I'll work on improving as per your comments. But didn't understand the meaning of this line That leaves these two sources: [1] [2] Kindly explain what you are trying to say. IvivekChoudhary ( talk) 01:43, 1 August 2023 (UTC) reply

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Draft:Dev Menaria, which you proposed for deletion. Drafts cannot be deleted using the WP:PROD process. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this draft should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the draft. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion; however, first please read Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion#Before nominating a page for deletion to see the guidelines. Thanks! Tartar Torte 01:44, 1 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi IVickyChoudhary, I've noticed Special:Diff/1168168223 where it appears that you've declined a draft without the necessary permissions to do so.

While many of the issues you've pointed out are very valid, only AFC reviewers should be reviewing AFC articles, and there is a certain criteria and an application process before an editor can become one as to ensure they have the necessary experience. Without that level of experience, a lot of mistakes could be made.

I appreciate your enthusiasm in working in backlogged areas of Wikipedia, but this one requires a bit more experience. I would love to see you pick this up again after a bit more editing :D Just i yaya 07:33, 1 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Thankyou for your kind words :) I'll keep that in mind for sure. iVickyChoudhary ( talk) 07:52, 1 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, IVickyChoudhary. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rakesh Kumar Tiwary, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 08:01, 3 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rizwan Sajan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A " bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 08:03, 14 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Housefull (film series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay ( talk) 12:35, 14 September 2023 (UTC) reply

I added the details of the fifth movie of the film series, and as you can check there's no sources provided on previous work also, If you want me to add reliable sources, I can add. iVickyChoudhary ( talk) 12:45, 14 September 2023 (UTC) reply

And reliable sources provided on movie's main page. iVickyChoudhary ( talk) 12:46, 14 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohamed Vishal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maldivian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akshithmanya was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sudipto Sen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akshithmanya ^talk 01:00, 17 October 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rizwan Sajan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rizwan Sajan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DJ InstaMalik ( talk) 11:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC) reply

So a newly created account on same day with only 3 edits, nominating a old contributor's article for deletion ? iVickyChoudhary ( talk) 10:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, IVickyChoudhary. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bhushan Kathuria, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 22:06, 2 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Sudipto Sen. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Whatttt!!! Conflict of interest with a movie director? May I know how is it possible? iVickyChoudhary ( talk) 16:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Again the same COI thing... iVickyChoudhary ( talk) 13:54, 24 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, IVickyChoudhary. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Bhushan Kathuria".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:13, 2 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Sudipto Sen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Twinkle1990 ( talk) 07:47, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply