|
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Google April Fools' Day jokes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ActuallyTheFakeJTP ( talk • contribs)( April Fools!) 17:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Israel Finkelstein. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 19:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
I only want to change the infoboxes listing non-existent nationalities, not the infoboxes that already use the citizenship parameter, of which there are plenty. Iroh ( talk) 22:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
bitch does not mean female dog. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 22:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
more Catholic than the Pope. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 23:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
1.
Der ewige Anglo. Ew. (Just kidding ;))
2. I'm not Israeli, and I hate to break it to you, but I don't think Roland is, either.
3. Based Creveld (though he tends to be a bit hyperbolic at times).
Iroh (
talk) 00:09, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Grayfell ( talk) 20:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
GirthSummit (blether) 12:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
For the record, I just wrote this less than an hour ago: "[a]ll right, now I've had enough of "edit warring" and off-topic discussions for months to come and then some. Let's start presenting and examining some non-primary sources so we can improve this article in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines (with which I like to belive I have now familiarised myself quite well)." Iroh ( talk) 14:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
If you're going to participate in this topic, I recommend reading the discussion
here to familiarize yourself with the recent history of disputes in this area. The most recent Arbitration Enforcement report about this topic, in March, referred the matter to the Arbitration Committee.
[8] (See the discussion in the "results" section.) However, when arbitration was requested a month later, ArbCom declined the request. Now that both AE and ArbCom have indicated they can't or don't want to deal with the issues on these articles, I'm not clear on what's supposed to happen at this stage.
If you decide that you want to make an Arbitration Enforcement report, you'll need to provide evidence that the users being reported are aware of the discretionary sanctions in this area. Grayfell received the discretionary sanctions notice within the past 12 months
here, and PaleoNeonate participated in Arbitration Enforcements reports in the topic area within the past 12 months
here and
here.
Please don't construe my mentioning this as an argument that you should make an AE report, because I can't decide whether it would be more appropriate to go to AE or ArbCom at this stage. However, I'd like to make sure you have the information necessary to make an AE report, if you think that's the best option.
2600:1004:B117:77AD:8C1A:DED2:C5B3:64DC (
talk) 23:08, 5 October 2020 (UTC) strike topic ban violation –
dlthewave
☎ 02:35, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ashkenazi Jewish intelligence; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Paleo Neonate – 08:31, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
But you barely addressed any of my points, and another editor agreed with me. There is clearly no consensus for this.Please reply on the article talk page. Iroh ( talk) 08:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
DarkFallenAngel (
talk)
is
wishing
you
a
Merry
Christmas (
quite possibly a
White
Christmas).
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
Spread the Christmas spirit by adding {{subst:User:Matty.007/template/Christmas}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message. If everyone who got this put it on two talk pages, we would have... lots of Christmas spirit! Have fun finding links in this message!
— 21:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Azula.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
If so, please mail me. I'd like to ask a few questions in private. Biohistorian15 ( talk) 09:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
|
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Google April Fools' Day jokes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ActuallyTheFakeJTP ( talk • contribs)( April Fools!) 17:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Israel Finkelstein. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 19:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
I only want to change the infoboxes listing non-existent nationalities, not the infoboxes that already use the citizenship parameter, of which there are plenty. Iroh ( talk) 22:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
bitch does not mean female dog. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 22:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
more Catholic than the Pope. Tgeorgescu ( talk) 23:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
1.
Der ewige Anglo. Ew. (Just kidding ;))
2. I'm not Israeli, and I hate to break it to you, but I don't think Roland is, either.
3. Based Creveld (though he tends to be a bit hyperbolic at times).
Iroh (
talk) 00:09, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Grayfell ( talk) 20:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
GirthSummit (blether) 12:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
For the record, I just wrote this less than an hour ago: "[a]ll right, now I've had enough of "edit warring" and off-topic discussions for months to come and then some. Let's start presenting and examining some non-primary sources so we can improve this article in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines (with which I like to belive I have now familiarised myself quite well)." Iroh ( talk) 14:01, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
If you're going to participate in this topic, I recommend reading the discussion
here to familiarize yourself with the recent history of disputes in this area. The most recent Arbitration Enforcement report about this topic, in March, referred the matter to the Arbitration Committee.
[8] (See the discussion in the "results" section.) However, when arbitration was requested a month later, ArbCom declined the request. Now that both AE and ArbCom have indicated they can't or don't want to deal with the issues on these articles, I'm not clear on what's supposed to happen at this stage.
If you decide that you want to make an Arbitration Enforcement report, you'll need to provide evidence that the users being reported are aware of the discretionary sanctions in this area. Grayfell received the discretionary sanctions notice within the past 12 months
here, and PaleoNeonate participated in Arbitration Enforcements reports in the topic area within the past 12 months
here and
here.
Please don't construe my mentioning this as an argument that you should make an AE report, because I can't decide whether it would be more appropriate to go to AE or ArbCom at this stage. However, I'd like to make sure you have the information necessary to make an AE report, if you think that's the best option.
2600:1004:B117:77AD:8C1A:DED2:C5B3:64DC (
talk) 23:08, 5 October 2020 (UTC) strike topic ban violation –
dlthewave
☎ 02:35, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ashkenazi Jewish intelligence; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Paleo Neonate – 08:31, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
But you barely addressed any of my points, and another editor agreed with me. There is clearly no consensus for this.Please reply on the article talk page. Iroh ( talk) 08:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
DarkFallenAngel (
talk)
is
wishing
you
a
Merry
Christmas (
quite possibly a
White
Christmas).
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
Spread the Christmas spirit by adding {{subst:User:Matty.007/template/Christmas}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message. If everyone who got this put it on two talk pages, we would have... lots of Christmas spirit! Have fun finding links in this message!
— 21:22, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Azula.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
If so, please mail me. I'd like to ask a few questions in private. Biohistorian15 ( talk) 09:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)