Hi Galendalia. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2020-05-31. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 19:13, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

@ L235: - Thanks but the rights were already done earlier by Lourdes ( talk · contribs) about an hour ago. But, hey at least I know people are looking at the requests :). Thanks! Galendalia ^{Chat Me Up} 19:16, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Apologies I didn't see that! We normally have a bot that tells us when these things are done, so I forgot to check in this case. My bad! Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 19:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

No worries man. I didn't see the done on it either lol. It is all good @ L235:!

Oh @ L235: I also noticed on the user list for the rights, there are "infinitely blocked" users still listed. Galendalia ^{Chat Me Up} 19:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I see you passed the CVUA fast, and wanted to say good job, I am still in the CVUA its taking me forever. Nice going hope to see you fighting vandalism around! The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 16:43, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks @ The4lines ( talk · contribs) Very much appreciated! Stick to it and you will pass! Galendalia ^{Chat Me Up} 19:43, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Also I see you have the San Diego county flag, are you from there, as I live in San Diego county. The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 19:02, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

@ The4lines: Yes I do. In OB. Galendalia ^{Chat Me Up} 19:04, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Cool, I live in the suburb of Escondido. The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 19:10, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

The4lines I am sorry Galendalia ^{Chat Me Up} 19:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

What??? The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 19:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

The4lines I thought all of Escondido was a 'suburb' :) Galendalia ^{Chat Me Up} 19:56, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Resolved

Hey there, I'm an administrator on the English Wikipedia. Look, I know you recently jumped into Guild of Copy Editors and I know you might've gotten burnt, from your perspective, but I want to encourage you to try again. I don't think that your efforts were made in bad faith, but with regard to the article The Sky is Pink, I think there were some hasty changes that should be addressed and I'm hoping you'll let me explain them to you, and I will do my best to not be condescending. I initially raised the matter with Puddleglum and my hope was that since they were your initial greeting contact, that maybe the feedback would have been better received from them, rather than from me, a stranger. I'm happy to explain my notes, but I don't want to burden you with unwanted criticism, so if or when you're ready, please feel free to {{ ping}} me or of course you don't have to at all. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 04:41, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

@ Cyphoidbomb: Hi I appreciate your efforts. Puddle had explained them to me but then the individuals within the guild made those statements which made and still make me unwanted. While I will do my best to fight vandalism, they and those individuals involved have a burnt a bridge that may never be repaired. I do appreciate you reaching out though. Galendalia ^{Chat Me Up} 04:46, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

I understand. Sorry it wasn't an inspirational experience. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 04:49, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

@ Cyphoidbomb: No worries. People were directing me to conflicting pages of what to do so they need to work it out. I’m sure I’ll find another way to help out though what I’m doing is a lot as well lol Galendalia ^{Chat Me Up} 04:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Hey Galendalia, I'm sorry as well that the GOCE didn't turn out to well for you. I understand your problems with how things have been handled, and I hope that the discussions members are having now will result in a better experience for new members. It's really a shame you were the catalyst and did not feel welcomed, but I hope your example is what prompts us to come up with a better welcoming system. All the best and stay well, -- Puddleglum ^2.0_{( How's my driving?)} 20:01, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

@ Puddleglum2.0: I will come back if Jonesy stops the personal attacks against me and other new users. Even the other new guild editor took his comments personally based on their comments. Galendalia ^{Chat Me Up} 20:06, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Im new here but to me it seemed like you were a good copy editor. I’m sorry about this turn of events. If you dont want to that’s fine, but could you explain why you left? Stay safe and well, -- Total Eclipse 2017 ^{( talk) ( Origin of the username)} —Preceding undated comment added 21:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

You only got here 2 weeks ago and are already a rollbacker and editing like a pro. Not bad :) Hillelfrei ^{• talk •} 16:18, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

​Thanks Hillelfrei! Very much appreciated! Galendalia^{CVU Chat Me Up} 10:41, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Y If you want to mention somebody in a talk page reply, make sure to use the template, which requires curly braces. For example, {{Yo|Adrian}}. — C.Fred ( talk) 02:59, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Yeah my phone autocorrects which really annoys me!!!! @ C.Fred: ;) Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 03:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Y Hello Galendalia, hope you are doing well. First off, I saw your edit warring report that included myself. I replied to your comment there with my rationale for reverting that vandalism-only account. I just wanted to let you know my talk page is open if you have any questions regarding anti-vandalism work, or anything about Wikipedia. I would be happy to help you. Thanks! -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:22, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

You are good. You can delete that. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 00:26, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

BTW @ LuK3: I striked through my comment! Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 03:03, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Y Unfortunately, I'm not familiar enough with everything going on to add my voice to the discussion. My apologies for not being able to do more, Spencer ^{T• C} 05:16, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

No worries @ Spencer:. Thanks! Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 05:22, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

 Done I wasn't sure where else to put this, but I wanted to let you know that, in your Spoken Wikipedia invite, the hyperlink to the participants list links to the Pronunciation task force list instead of the Spoken Wikipedia participants list. It looked unintentional, but I could be mistaken. — Madqueencabbage (talk) 07:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

@ Madqueencabbage: Thank you for pointing that out! It has been fixed. Once the page is refreshed, it should show. I tested yours and when I did the CTRL+F5, the link came up properly. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 07:16, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello Galendalia,

I actually feel that the content I attempted to remove was "less than neutral". The article is a list of nicknames in "common usage at the time they were in office or shortly thereafter". As I mentioned in my edit summary, the fact that several journalists may have used these nicknames isn't what is meant by the phrase "common usage". I have never heard Trump referred to by these nicknames in conversations with live people. I removed them because they obviously do not fit the article's own characterization of itself, and I'm curious as to how that could possibly seem "less than neutral" to you. Please reconsider your decision or redefine the terms of the article.

Thank you

2601:445:37F:8A10:15C2:192E:EF1D:B373 ( talk) 20:15, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

I have looked at the edits and the sources and they do indeed meet the criteria for inclusion on the page as they are cited from reliable sources. Just because you have not heard them used, does not give you the right to remove the edits by other users, especially when they have been up there for a couple months. I stand by my decision.

Thanks Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 20:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

I have started a new section on Talk:creaming about the other use of creaming. If you have any information on it can you add it there? 2601:647:CB03:5930:3904:EF4C:FBD9:5 ( talk) 22:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Not sure why I this post was put here. Please explain. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 23:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

• I thought maybe you knew about this use of "creaming" since you reverted my edit about using shaving or whipped cream as a prank. I thought maybe you knew what this type of creaming was, because I am uncertain what form of cream is used for this prank. 2601:647:CB03:5930:685E:CEF8:9CD9:8344 ( talk) 23:35, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

• OK, I pinged you on the talk page. 2601:647:CB03:5930:685E:CEF8:9CD9:8344 ( talk) 23:39, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

 Courtesy link: [[: Talk:Basilica]] What was the reason you deleted my 3O request? Elizium23 ( talk) 07:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

I’m typing out what I need to right now so please have some patience @ Elizium23: Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 07:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello Galendalia, is there any way you could undo your change to my edit on the Hed PE (album) article? I do have an image of the cassette tape with the original tracklisting, including the cut track that I mentioned in my edit, that I can upload. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warheadz666 ( talk • contribs) 13:20, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

@ Warheadz666: I believe I reverted your change due to the name of the hidden track as there is no source cited about that hidden track. Please remember to sign your posts using ~~~~. Thanks Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 19:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deferred to Wikipedia:DNR

The only reason the article read that way at that point in time is because GPinkerton had modified it from its original form. He had split off the Catholic basilica section without consensus and erased them from the main article. I am amazed that you would take his word at face value instead of attempt to resolve the dispute. Elizium23 ( talk) 21:43, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

@ Gpinkerton: and @ Elizium23: - It has nothing to do with taking anyone's word. It is not my job to resolve the dispute, it is my job to offer a 3rd opinion (they are two completely separate items). I read through all of the previous conversations. If you feel I was wrong, please provide me the diffs on those pages in which the short descriptions were changed and I will review it again. I am a neutral party to this and I have read everything and stated certain things should not be listed in the article as there are separate articles for each of the Basilica types. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 21:54, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Galendalia, The Latin word basilica (derived from Greek: βασιλική στοά, Royal Stoa, the tribunal chamber of a king) has three distinct applications in modern English. Old revision of article Elizium23 ( talk) 21:57, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Resolved

No, that magazine is officially "The Saturday Evening Post", just like its "The New York Times". Thanks, 2600:1004:B114:E087:C834:FAF5:3072:B856 ( talk) 01:57, 10 May 2020 (UTC) :What are you talking about? You have to give me a link to the article or something that will tell me what you are talking about? Thanks Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 01:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

When I did the revert on the article, you had 'the' outside of the title, which is why it was flagged. It can take a moment to reflect on your pages, so it came in after you fixed it. I apologize for that, but the cached pages are in place on the server, so that causes a delay. You are good to go. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 02:09, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. However, I will reopen the case. The user was only blocked for 31 hours, and DRN is a constructive rather than a disruptive way to try to resolve the dispute. I will allow them to discuss the birthplace and birthdate controversy when they come off block. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:39, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

@ Robert McClenon: - I closed it as Material Scientist blocked the user for the exact same thing on the same article and the user attempt to appeal his block 2x both being declined. The editor has stated nothing new, even in their appeal requests. I would ask it not to be re-opened. Thanks, Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 18:48, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

/info/en/?search=User_talk:Pboni75#Notice_of_Dispute_resolution_noticeboard_discussion

User:Galendalia - Usually I favor harsh action against stubborn editors, and I think I understand your viewpoint. However, in this case, I see no harm done in allowing the editor to serve out their block and discuss the issue. The worst that can happen is that they might get indeffed. The best that might happen is that they might agree to participate in an RFC. A middle possibility is that they might serve their block and give up on Wikipedia, in which case the dispute will be closed as abandoned. If they resort to sockpuppetry, they were going to resort to sockpuppetry anyway, and will be banned. If they get indeffed, they were going to get indeffed anyway. You don't need to take part in the case if there is a case. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Gotcha @ Robert McClenon:! That makes sense to me. I will keep an eye on it. Thanks again Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 19:00, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Dear Galendalia, thank you for volunteering as a host at the Teahouse. Wikipedia is a community of people working together to make knowledge free. You are an important part of that effort! By joining as a Host, and by following our expectations, you are helping new users get a hold of the ropes here at Wikipedia, and helping experienced users who just have a question about how something works. We appreciate your willingness to help!

Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:

• Helpful scripts you can install to make Teahouse responding easier,
• templates to use and, of course:
• the question forum itself.

Editors who have signed up as hosts, but who have not contributed at the Teahouse for six months or so may be removed from the list of hosts.

Regards Nick Moyes ( talk) 10:14, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Resolved

Could you please explain why you rolled back this? There was absolutely nothing wrong with the material you removed, and the 130.xxxxx IP is a good (and unregistered) contributor. The Rambling Man ( Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 18:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

@ The Rambling Man: My bad. It showed as a regular article and not any type of project. I will start using the pop-up page button to verify anything I am questioning. Again, I apologize. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 19:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

No worries, it happens. Could you replace the text you removed please, if you haven't done so already? Cheers. The Rambling Man ( Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Y @ The Rambling Man: - I have put them back in. The second one was a little harder as their is a section not signed and I am assuming the same editor wrote it. Thanks again! Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 20:31, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Cheers. The Rambling Man ( Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 20:33, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the link Galendalia.

Crashingdown Man ( talk) 01:48, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi – we had spoken on the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard regarding the Ahmaud Arbery page. I was wondering if I could ask your general advice. – Chrisvacc ( talk) 02:38, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

It depends on what it is. If it has anything to do with the DR then no because it has to be restricted to the board. If it is outside of that realm and what the dispute was about then have at it! Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 02:42, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

No it doesn't really have to do with the DR. Kind of - but in a very roundabout way. I've just been noticing some disturbing trends about Neutrality in general on Wikipedia where users interject their political stances into the content of articles. Many of them happen to be Wikipedia Power Users and they und up bullying articles into submission. You seemed knowledgable so I was wondering where an appropriate place to bring this up would be. It's not about that dispute specifically, but I do think that's one example. – Chrisvacc ( talk) 02:59, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

I see a lot of stuff like citing sources that are not politically neutral, I'm wondering how I can start a discussion about this where the editorbase of WP can discuss this. I think there should be some guidelines about using apolitical sources over political ones. – Chrisvacc ( talk) 03:09, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi @ Chrisvacc: That is a great question. Here is the link to Neutral point of view. As you read through it it will cover all sorts of different topics and how to handle things. Now as far as any disputes here is our policy on Dispute Resolution. As I may not always be online, you can also ask questions at Teahouse where someone is always available 24/7 to assist you. I am also a host as well. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 03:29, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Perhaps I can write an Essay on apolitical sourcing? In my opinion I think that apolitical sources should be prefered to sources like Fox News, CNN, Vox and I think this is a good guideline for WP in general. More and more I've been noticing people choosing sources with known political motives.

• Home of the Media Bias Chart - Ad Fontes Media Version 5.0
• Media Bias/Fact Check - Search and Learn the Bias of News
• AllSides | Balanced news via media bias ratings for an unbiased news perspective

Do you think an essay like that would be well-received?

Thanks for the Teahouse link – Chrisvacc ( talk) 03:37, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

We actually already have that in place. Let me see if I can find the page again as it’s not one I bookmark. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 03:39, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Or perhaps I'll just add those links to the NPOV page. – Chrisvacc ( talk) 03:41, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Here is the page no need to reinvent the wheel. Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 03:42, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Alright thanks a ton. The issue is how relaible and how apolitical. Reliability exists on a spectrum. For example Reuters is more relaible than Buzzfeed News. Pew Research Center is more relaible than Vox. But all of those are considered Reliable on the list (and I agree they should be, but some are just more Reliable.) Maybe I'll bring up the issue on the Talk page. Thanks a ton for the links, super helpful. – Chrisvacc ( talk) 03:58, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Just look at the comments added to them. Look at the row for CNN. If there are any you want to add, change, etc make sure your read the instructions and wait for consensus as we are a population not one individual person who overseas everything. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 04:10, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Yes, the article is very good. Thanks. – Chrisvacc ( talk) 04:21, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Galendia- I am a volunteer on DRN. I had already responded to the person who opened the Magic case, because there is an open case on another dispute board- the NPOV board (I mistakenly said RFC, sorry about that) it does not qualify for the DRN now. I appreciate the desire to help, but I would appreciate a message, or being contacted if you think I have closed something in error before you revert the page. I realize this isn't a requirement, I'm just asking as a professional courtesy. Thank you. Nightenbelle ( talk) 17:48, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

I also checked and did not see one. I just posted on your page at the same time. Can you link the RFC please? Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 17:50, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Howdy hello! Happy to see ya sticking around. As requested, I have restored your user page. Let me know if there are any other pages you'd like to have restored. Smooth sailing, CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!} ⚓ 16:13, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Cap'n! --Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 16:17, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

@ CaptainEek: - Can you also do my subpages, please? --Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 16:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Galendalia, Done, I think I got 'em all. Ping me if I missed something :) CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!} ⚓ 16:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Cap'n @ CaptainEek: Looks good --Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 16:55, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

I see you've put a great many of your pages up for deletion and have mentioned vanishing, have you read the page on courtesy vanishing? We'd be sad to see you go, but I understand that sometimes Wikipedia loses its charm. You should have a very solid reason for doing so, though no need to share it. Beware: vanishing is meant to be permanent. If you'd simply like to stop editing, feel free. But if you wish to vanish, it is understood that you will not return, and if you do return, your account may need to be re-activated or it could be viewed as sockpuppetry. If you are vanishing for private reasons, or wish this conversation to be non-public, you should email a Wikipedia:Functionaries. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!} ⚓ 23:56, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

If you have already contacted a functionary, feel free to ignore this message. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!} ⚓ 23:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

I was surprised to see this too! Signed, The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 00:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

If this regards the trouble you ran into with DRN, I'm very sorry, and hope you reconsider. Entering new arenas can be vexing even for the best of us, as there are many unwritten rules that take time to learn. I've seen you around and appreciated your efforts, and hope you stick around. If not, I wish you the best. Smooth sailing, CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!} ⚓ 00:09, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

No this has to do with the way in which admins are treating me from day one when I asked questions in the chat and having been spoken to rudely, then booted out and that just compounded from there and that just seems the norm. I have better things to do than be a victim of the cliques of admins on here that think they are the know-all and they have the final say. I have nothing more to say. I have filled out the form for the stewards. It had nothing to do with the DRN, however, it had to do with the comments people made about me being a part of it and attacking me. I am not here for that. Cheers and best of luck. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.107.73.181 ( talk) 00:29, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

• Galendalia, if this is in response to our recent interaction at RSN, I would at least suggest taking a day/weekend off and then see if you still think that retiring from wikipedia is the right action. I assume you did gain some pleasure from your contributions here over the past month, and while the editing experience on wikipedia may not be pleasant in each instance, the overall effort can be worthwhile and pleasurable for many. So do give it another thought. All the best in whatever you decide. Abecedare ( talk) 01:04, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
• Hi Galendalia, I'm sad to see that you want to leave. Starting 6 RfCs at once tends to provoke a negative reaction from the community, but there are plenty of other things you can do on Wikipedia to contribute to noticeboard maintenance if this is something you're interested in. I'm going to send you an invitation to WikiProject Reliability. Please let me know if you'd like to participate, and I'll be happy to show you the ropes. —  Newslinger  talk 05:46, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
• Hey, mate: It's a difficult time for many of us right now. Hope you're ok. I was surprised to see you talking of giving up here, so might I suggest you just simply walk away for a week or two and see how you feel later on? It's easy to get burnout, or feel the whole world is against you - but that's never the case. You know where I am if you need a private word. Nick Moyes ( talk) 12:33, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
• It will be sad if you left, as you are a promising editor. I know it is was hard before this, but when the world world is shut up in a lockdown, it makes it harder. Take a wiki break, talk to someone privately, but don’t leave! Please don't, Best, Signed, The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 00:59, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
• +1 to the above. Wikipedia has a steep learning curve where you aren't as respected by the higher-ups, but I do encourage you to continue, perhaps after taking a wikibreak. You were a fantastic CVUA student, I'd hate to see you go. -- puddleglum ^2.0 15:57, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

• So I did a LOT OF THINKING over the weekend. I have decided I am going to stay (if an admin could restore my profile page, I would appreciate it). I just need to let the constant barrage of attacks from certain people roll off of my back and when I have questions, I can go to those I have trust in like Puddle, Nick, and 4lines So I am going to resume what I was doing and I am going to take pride in it. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 15:55, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

• Lines Sighs In relive. You can go to Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion for your user page. If you already asked an admin you are welcome to Disregard this message. Signed, The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 16:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Already done. However, can you fix my archive on my talk page please. It is not showing the archive box. Should be 2 days, and nothing needs to be left. Thanks @ The4lines: --Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 16:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Your page is wired I can’t fix it? I don’t know what is wrong with it. Signed, The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 16:57, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

You have to have 3 lines or less to do it --Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 17:01, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Everything that's older than 2 days will be archived tonight, and then it will show up in the {{ talk header}}. Primefac ( talk) 18:11, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi @ Primefac: - I am also looking for other things that were archived and why the box didn't show up. --Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 18:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Your old naming scheme wasn't compatible with {{ talk header}}. I moved your archive and it should be good to go. Primefac ( talk) 18:13, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks @ Primefac: I will look tomorrow. --Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 18:15, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I'm interested as to why you renamed yourself. What happened? — Yours, Berrely •  ^Talk∕ _Contribs 10:04, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Yeah Why? Signed, The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 14:08, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

This was corrected!!

Cool I thought you were going to leave! Signed, The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 16:52, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Glad to see you return! Once you gain some more experience, I'm sure everything will be less discouraging - there is light at the end of the tunnel! If you have any questions or problems, you know where to go. I'm always open, and will do my best to respond to your questions in a timely fashion. Anyway, all that said: glad you're back! -- puddleglum ^2.0 23:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks @ Puddleglum2.0:! --Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 18:49, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

 You are invited to join the discussion at mw:Talk:Growth/Personalized first day/Structured tasks. (We need someone from the CVU there, and I noticed you recently commented on the talk page.) {{u| Sdkb}}  ^talk 00:03, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Done! Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 00:09, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

what this is meant to achieve? Blocked or not, there rarely a reason for editors to change others' User pages, and I couldn't see any justification for doing so in these. And what is the "main list" that needs clearing? May I suggest you self-revert them. Many thanks! serial ^# 08:25, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

@ Serial Number 54129: The main lists for Gnomes and Fairies is done via the tag in the page. They were removed from the indefinite blocked users to clean up the main lists as the tag puts them in a category. In part of the stuff I’m doing is cleaning up stale parts of Wikipedia, which includes lists of various things. If the editor somehow gets their rights back they can re-add the tag if they want but having a list of 100 blocked users on a project page or otherwise is not needed and only takes up space. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 08:33, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

No; I suggest you seek a consensus for these changes at WP:AN, get some more eye on the problem. Indeed, it will establish if there is a problem that needs addressing. All the best, serial ^# 08:54, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

I disagree with you @ Serial Number 54129:. Read WP:UOWN. I’m not making significant changes only minor therefore does not require a consensus as the editors are not coming back. This includes the addition/removal of tags. Have a great one! Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 09:20, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

You're getting UOWN backwards: it's saying that, in fact, you should only edit others' user pages to make significant changes ("rarely"), which is clearly intended to address blatant trolling, etc, and as such you should not be making cosmetic or minor to other users' pages. Also see 7.3.2: This should not be done for trivial reasons. serial ^# 09:38, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

@ Serial Number 54129:: Again I am disagreeing with you. It clearly states "...Bots and other users may edit pages in your user space or leave messages for you, though by convention others will not usually edit your user page itself, other than (rarely) to address significant concerns or place project-related tags..." - I am another editor, editing the user pages of indefinitely blocked users or sockpuppets. By getting the list cleaned up is considered project related. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up} 17:47, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- —— Serial ^# 18:22, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Copied to Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Comment_from_another_volunteer's_User_page by user PoliceSheep99

Defer to Wikipedia:DRN

Hi, I've never interacted with the Dispute Resolution system on Wikipedia before, but I think I may be able to provide some useful information as I have worked in the office of a former member of the Shadow Cabinet. My WP:COI deceleration is available on my userpage.

Rachel Reeves was appointed as Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster to shadow Michael Gove who is the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster in the Second Johnson ministry. Gove also holds the role of Minister for the Cabinet Office - this is not disputed.

Shadow Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster is a new shadow cabinet position created this year by the new Labour Party leader Keir Starmer. However, the duties of this role were performed by Jon Trickett as Shadow Lord President of the Council. Trickett also held the position of Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office - again, looking at the talk page for Reeves, this seems not to be disputed.

As the functions of the role Trickett held are almost identical to that of Reeves, it seems to me that his page can be used as precedent to also include Reeves' position of Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office in the infobox.

Hope this helps. PoliceSheep99 ( talk) 03:00, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi @ PoliceSheep99: I am actually not the moderator on that dispute. I just posted the notices. When it’s formally opened you will see a statement by the moderator stating so and you can link them to this message so you don’t have to type it back out. Thanks for your input. Galendalia _{CVU Member} \ ^{Chat Me Up}|

Hi Galendalia! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service for one or both of the Good Article nomination categories "Arts" and "Everyday life".

You may have noticed that the Feedback Request Service has been inoperative for a number of months, and Yapperbot is currently in the process of taking over from Legobot in performing the requests. In that process, the subscription categories have been updated to match the current categories used by the Good Articles project, and neither "Arts" nor "Everyday life" is used anymore.

What this means is:

• If you were subscribed to "Arts", your preference has been transferred to Art and architecture as a new category, which you have automatically been opted in to. You may also be interested in Music and/or Media and drama; however, you have not automatically been opted in to these. If you wish to opt in to these, you should follow the process below.
• If you were subscribed to "Everyday life", you have been unsubscribed entirely from that category, as the category is too vague to assign to any of the new, more specific, categories.

You are encouraged to review your FRS preferences to ensure that they match your interests; there are a number of new categories you can now opt in to additionally. To do this, you should:

1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
2. If you were previously subscribed to "Arts" and wish to unsubscribe from "Art and architecture", scroll to that subheading and remove your {{ Frs user}} template.
3. If you wish to subscribe to an additional category, you should do so by pasting {{ Frs user|{{subst:currentuser}}|limit}} underneath the relevant heading, where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
4. Publish the page.

Please note that any subscription preferences you had with the FRS for requests for comment have not been affected by these changes.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on Yapperbot's operator's talk page. Thank you!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) at 21:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC).

It was the reliable sources of times of India please do not remove in use temple from their I am still working on it Thehitavada ( talk) 21:08, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi Thehitavada you cannot delete any templates without an explanation regardless if you are working on them or not. Also when it comes up in our vandalism software a score is assigned and since you blanked out information en masse and again provided no reason for deletion, it gets reverted. Here at Wikipedia we have strict policies involving the biographies of living people and recently deceased. You can view everything here on the Wikipedia:Blp page to help guide you. I noticed you also just created your profile, so I am going to post a standard welcome message to your talk page that will provide other guides for you, which includes the Manual of Style which is how we edit articles and the policies and procedures. Thanks, Galendalia ( talk) 21:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Galendalia, while you are undoubtedly aware of the original ANI discussion, I have highlighted some broader concerns. Please take a look and feel free to respond there, at your leisure. Abecedare ( talk) 23:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Why are you leaving? Give me a good reason and I’ll leave you forever, Ok? Signed, The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 23:55, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Look at ani Galendalia ( talk) 00:12, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

I dont see where? Never mind. Please dont attack other users. I suggest backing away from a lot of things, and just stay where you feel like you know that area. User:Moneytrees gave me a good sentence that applies to you. Don’t go every where. Even if you are good intentioned it generally does not go good with the editors. Like he told to stick to Copyvios, NPP, and articles. Just stay in a few places, or your burn out early, or what you just did. Come back and Ill be happy to mentor you. Replied on your ANI. Signed, The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 00:13, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Who's gonna take care of the revived project now?! Galendalia, take a look at Wikipedia:Rage quit or some of the pages linked there to put things in perspective. Declaring retirement in light of a conflict is a dime a dozen and I bet you'll come back like most of them—because you clearly care about the project. Nobody's really accusing you of bad faith; that's good. Your transgression in question is nothing compared to the ones a lot of more thick-skinned editors get accused of and get away with (for good or ill). Follow The4lines' advice and I'm sure everybody will just move on. Nardog ( talk) 01:43, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

I agree with the above. We all make mistakes, the important is to learn from them. The particular problem at ANI is unrelated to your WikiProject efforts and if you stop editing user pages, that particular disruption is over. As you already know, there's much to do on Wikipedia. — Paleo Neonate – 06:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

I posted my final comment on the ANI. I direct you to that please. Galendalia ( talk) 07:04, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I wish you well on reinvigorating the Spoken Wikipedia project! Please, no need to send any further mass talk page messages to previous Spoken Wikipedia participants. You've sent two already and they interested parties can follow on the project page if they are interested. Also, please reconsider referring to yourself as "the Project Coordinator." As with most things on Wikipedia, it's best to think of it as more of a collaborative effort. -- Norvy (talk) 07:10, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi @ Norvy: I apologize for the notifications. The participant list should be finalized by the end of the month. If you are not interested you can remove yourself from the project and you will not get any more messages. Messages will be sent out periodically to encourage any discussions on the talk page as not everyone pays attention and I may need to draw attention to it. While I do agree with your statement about the collaborative effort which covers all of Wikipedia, all projects have the main coordinator who oversees the project. I only add that to my signature when it is related to the project, otherwise, it is my standard signature. Thanks again for your input! Galendalia ( talk) 07:20, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

@ The4lines: Thank you for your offer. I’m accepting the fact you can adopt me and carry me on a leash to help show the way. Wanna do the user boxes?

Galendalia ( talk) 06:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Sure, the box of that said that I adopted you? Signed, The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 14:24, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Here ya go {{Adopter|Galendalia}} and I have created a page for us to use ( User_talk:Galendalia/adoption_chat). I am so excited. Of course we also have IRC as you know. Galendalia Talk to me ^{CVU Graduate} 16:03, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Perfect, I am excited too, because you are my first adoptee. If you gave questions ask it in the talk page! Signed, The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 16:13, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

 Deferred to Talk: The King (2019 film)
Come to the talk page for the King. I have added a lot there to consider. The text you have reverted to is completely bias, is the opinion of one man and contradicts wikipedias own entry for the battle. 87.112.15.36 ( talk) 00:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Please accept this Pie as a pardon. Signed, The4lines |||| ( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.) 00:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks! Galendalia Talk to me ^{CVU Graduate} 17:02, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
• No problem, would you mind if I was a co mentor? I mean if you don't want me it is fine, but I liked being your mentor for about a day..... W-Signed, The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 17:06, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

• Honestly The4lines it would be up to whoever decided they wanted to be my adopter. I do not see me having a choice in the matter right now. Galendalia Talk to me ^{CVU Graduate} 17:08, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Right, I hope it is a mentor that lets me be a co mentor :) Signed, The4lines |||| ^{( You Asked?) ( What I have Done.)} 17:13, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Hey Galendalia. Just wanted to let you know I reverted your revert as HaWikiGoEdit's revision integrated the phrase into the prose. Hope you're doing well! — Tenryuu 🐲 (  💬 •  📝 ) 19:02, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

A bit of topic from what's going on above, but shouldn't the archiving be reduced to something like 1 time per month? Numerous discussions are being necessarily archived. — Yours, Berrely •  ^Talk∕ _Contribs 11:46, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi @ Berrely: I haven’t changed it. It was set that way to keep the page clean. I’m going to change it in a moment. Thank you for bringing that to my attention. Galendalia Talk to me ^{CVU Graduate} 11:50, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

@ Nick: - Thank you for pulling those out of archive and putting back on page. I didn’t want to break it so I’m glad you fixed it. Thankful as always Galendalia Talk to me ^{CVU Graduate} 12:42, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

I didn't want to pile on, and please don't treat the following as a warning, it's not. I'm telling you this purely for your own information.
You shouldn't remove any declined unblocks for active blocks (it's detailed at Wikipedia:User_pages#Ownership_and_editing_of_user_pages). We typically take any extended discussion concerning the unblock request to be part of the declined unblock, not just the template portion. A good rule of thumb would be to avoid removing anything from your talk page after the block notice is left. If you notice your auto-archiving has hidden something, we would hope you would restore it in a reasonable amount of time. The precise details aren't written down fully because blocks can often be complicated and there may be times when we would wish slightly different procedures or processes to be followed, such as when a checkuser is involved, or there is the oversight of sensitive information, but for most blocks, what I've said is typical procedure amongst the community. Nick ( talk) 13:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

I've put {{ subst:dnau}} on the relevant sections, which should prevent them from being archived for a sufficiently long period of time. When you are unblocked, just remove the comments at the top of the sections and the bot'll archive them. -- AntiCompositeNumber ( talk) 15:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

@ Nick: & @ AntiCompositeNumber: - Thank you both for those edits in helping fix and put the archives back on the page. I appreciate that and well have a cookie (you have to imagine it though) Galendalia Talk to me ^{CVU Graduate} 17:27, 11 June 2020 (UTC)