This is a subpage of ErikTheBikeMan's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

This user is happy with messages like {{ smile}} and RfA notification being left here This message is posted here due to the fact that other users have posted a message saying the opposite

This user is busy in real life due to the dreaded school year and swimming and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

1, 2, RFA Thanks and Smiles

25 April 2024
In the media: Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics and another wikirace on live TV News and notes: A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap WikiProject report: WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS) Recent research: New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users Traffic report: O.J., cricket and a three body problem
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

---

Hi, I was going through the WP:O#Inactive list and found that Kivar2's talk page had been deleted. I noticed that the last edit before deletion was you redirecting his talk page to yours. Was he your alternate account? Should he be removed from the inactive list altogether? Puzzled,-- Aervanath ( talk) 18:40, 31 January 2009 (UTC) Yes, he was my public sock, though I havn't had reason to use him lately. I think that it might be better to create an account along the lines of "Erik's Public Sock" or something... ErikTheBikeMan ( talk) 21:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I'll strike it from WP:O, then. No pointing in having you on the active list and you're sock on the inactive list. :) It doesn't matter what you call your sock, as long as you're upfront about it. Mine is User:Aervasock (you can see I've marked the user page as such), and I just make sure I tagged the user pages accordingly. I'm still not sure why Kivar2's talk page redirect to your page was deleted; out of curiosity I looked into Tikiwont's contrbutions around that time, and it seemed unrelated to what he was doing. Do you want me to restore it?-- Aervanath( talk) 01:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Note: I've copied this to your page, where the conversation started; no reason to split up the conversation, as I'm watching this page.-- Aervanath ( talk) 02:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I'll continue it here. I've added the same sock template that's on your sock's page to mine (switching the username parameter, of course). I've also redirected the talk page to mine (I did leave your message, though). ErikTheBikeMan ( talk) 04:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi Erik, just an fyi in case you aren't a watchlister, I declined your speedy deletion request on the above article and replaced it with a "cleanup" tag. I'm not convinced of the notability, but the article at the minimum at least asserts some and provides references to be checked out. Feel free to bring the article to WP:AFD if you think the community should discuss whether the article should stay or go. Cheers mate - Keeper | 76 21:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Please see Talk:Islam in Burma#Copy edit, August 2008 as I've returned for more copyediting. Cheers -- fraise ( talk) 09:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for taking on the mediation.

I've written my explanation in Talk:Leopard tank#Mediation of Flags in Operator's List. — Michael  Z. 2009-02-05 07:50 z

You wrote on my talkpage: Hey, I saw your revert, then self-revert on Pseudo-acronym. Thank you for catching your own mistake! ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 01:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Yup. The uncited ref looked, on first blush, like a typical act of vandalism, and the revert was pretty much reflex. But then I saw that it was an established username, looked at the contribs, and knew that the inference couldn't be right (exception: one time, I was logged on, and one of my son's friends made a couple of way ugly edits I'm still living with). So I fleshed the entry out a bit. I'd like to see all the items on that page documented or at least explained -- it's a page that attracts a lot of WP:Patent nonsense and WP:OR, so people who watch it may be just a little trigger-happy. So sorry for that -- your good rep is well-earned, and I surely woudln't want to damage it. Best, DavidOaks ( talk) 04:20, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Weekly Delivery

Volume 5, Issue 6	8 February 2009	About the Signpost

News and notes: Elections, licensing update, and more	Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs"
Dispatches: April Fools 2009 mainpage	WikiProject Report: WikiProject Music
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 21:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 03:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

I have added information about how to access the archive into the Popular Science article...

For example, the following URL links to the May 1932 issue, with an index of covers below to access any of the other issues:

http://books.google.com/books?id=1ScDAAAAMBAJ&source=gbs_all_issues_r&cad=2_2

DMahalko ( talk) 00:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi, sorry. I've started composing a reply, but haven't had time to do it justice. I'll do so in a day or so. Thanks for your patience. — Michael  Z. 2009-02-12 02:35 z

Hi, the discussion has not ended yet, so 12 February 2009 should not be put in the action3date field. I put February 2009 there because it is unlikely that the discussion will carry on until after February. -- Joshua Issac ( talk) 20:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I saw your name on Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors and hoped that you could copyedit an article for me. I have been working on List of National Monuments of the United States and it is now at FLC, and the reviewers suggested proofreading. I would really appreciate it if you could please copyedit this article for me, and I'd be happy to help out with one of your articles in return. Thank you! Reywas92 ^Talk 18:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 06:38, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

I declined the A1 speedy on this one; the editor says it's a cocktail, and I did get one Google hit on that as a cocktail. There's a notability issue, so you might want to prod or AfD it. - Dan Dank55 ( push to talk) 19:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Sources promptly added to the Vadstena bracteate, sorry for just providing Swedish language sources, but these are often the best ones, sadly. Nixdorf ( talk) 21:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

• Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
• An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
• News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
• Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
• Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
• Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 01:32, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello, you currently have an Editor review request listed on the main page, although it has failed to gain comments, are you still interested in having it open, if so or if not please acknowledge me of that to make a proper archival of the nomination. Thanks.-- TRU CO 22:38, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Since you have no comments, is 2 weeks enough?-- TRU CO 00:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for your vote and support in the Stewardship Election 2009! I'll probably try again next year, so... stay tuned :) Al Lemos ( talk) 20:31, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I was wondering why you consider a major Chinese car maker to be anything other than notable - there are so many auto article where the company produces tiny numbers of cars - this isnt the case with Shuanghuan カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! ( talk) 05:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

I took a quick look at some of the articles that you have created, I find it hard to understand why you would nominate a major car maker for deletion, while creating pages that have some obscure Jazz musician as the subject. I look forward to your reply. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! ( talk) 05:45, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

TY. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! ( talk) 20:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

When you patrol articles for speedy deletion, you should have a look at the history to make sure what you're tagging isn't just vandalism to a useful page, as happened with Mee. Cheers, Sarcasticidealist ( talk) 05:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

On 2 March, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Old Icelandic Homily Book, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator ( talk) 04:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

• Books extension enabled
• News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
• Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 08:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 22:11, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, and technically they are genuses, but I don't have any references, but I'll get some, thanks for seeing that or I would hav ha to go back and add them. Buɡboy52.4 ( talk) 02:06, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly Episode 71: We have no shame has been released. You can listen and comment at the episode page, and, as always, listen to all of the past episodes and subscribe to the RSS feed at wikipediaweekly.org. WODUPbot 05:27, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

You're receiving this because you're listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly/delivery. If you'd like to stop receiving these messages, please remove yourself from that list.

Hey Erik, your ER has been open past the 30 day time limit, I see that you are very active on WP, but have failed to respond to any comments at your ER. If you are satisfied with the review, or no longer wish to have it open, please let me know so I can archive it. If you feel otherwise, also let me know to give it more time. Best, -- ₮RU CӨ 20:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 18:46, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

• News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
• Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
• Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
• Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
• Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
• Features and admins: Approved this week
• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 23:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

We don't have any online articles that link to us. We have magazine articles that refer to us - can I use them as references? I have also replied to your deletion proposal. y0z2a ( talk) 15:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

I have read the COI information, and I do have a conflict of interest. I gather from that page that now that I have a conflict of interest I am not allowed to edit the page further for sake of risking a ban? I obviously wanted to create a factually correct article about our company. I don't wish to have the article deleted, however I am obviously respectful of the rules that you have in place. Am I able to do anything that will mean that the information is not seen to be COI. I based the article on one of our competitors who is listed Demon Tweeks Y0z2a ( talk) 15:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Your ER has been open for over 2 months. It has gained a couple of reviews. It has exceeded the 30 days time limit, it will need to be archived, do you still wish to keep it open any longer?--Best, ₮RU CӨ 02:58, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

You have failed to give a reply, as a result, your ER has been archived. If you wish to open another in the future, don't hesitate.--Best, ₮RU CӨ 00:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Water Babies(Restored, Alternate crop 2).jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 03:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 22:39, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

I try to make a better article about Hov. Why can you accepted the new version. I have made the most wiki articles about Faroe Islands and the most pictures are mine. My flickr set Hov is only with my own pictures User:Erik W. Christensen 18. March 2009 kl. 14:57 (faroe time)

I want to have this link in the Hov article:

• Official web-site
• Private photo set

Please can you do it! - Thank you very much Venlig hilsen User:Erik W. Christensen 18. March 2009 kl. 16:02 (faroe time)

Where did you get the info that he founded the Leeds Club? It's not mentioned in the ODNB article! PamD ( talk) 23:06, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 00:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Awarded for tirelessly working on articles, and for you exceptionally talented edits. South Bay ( talk) 03:48, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 03:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 19:59, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 02:29, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 19:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Hotel toilet-paper folding at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Shubinator ( talk) 02:15, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Please re!vote on this nom. It was relisted and your previous vote no longer counts. Thanks. ~ ωαdεstεr16 _«talk ^stalk» 05:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

My RFA passed today at 61/5/4. Thanks for participating in my RFA. I appreciate all the comments I received and will endeavor to justify the trust the WP community has placed in me. Have a nice day. :-) AdjustShift ( talk) 21:32, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

I just fixed up your edit to Template:WikiProject Norse history and culture. It should work better like that. Bear in mind that you now have 11 x 6 = 66 categories to create now though! Regards, — Martin ( MSGJ ·  talk) 23:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 16:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Jessie Willcox Smith - The Water Babies - p236 (Restored).jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 02:36, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

On 16 April, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hotel toilet-paper folding, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator ( talk) 02:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey there, I had a first shot at the table. I basically only linked the numbers inside the table to their respective category. Have a look here. How on earth a bot is supposed to update that really isn't my field :P I also blued the red links on this page, I hope that is what you meant. Is there anything else that needs to be done? – Holt ( T• C) 17:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I agree it is time for you to 'graduate' from the adoption process. (Sorry I took so long to reply by the way) Anonymous101 ( talk) 07:34, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

"Homosexual anal sex", already a fairly convoluted description of what "gay sodomy" would perfectly adequately describe, does not require any further explanation: anal sex requires a man in order to be sex. Homosexuality requires two people of the same sex in order to be homosexual. This is notwithstanding that I daresay the source in question does not dictate that "pitcher" and "catcher" must apply only to participants in homosexual anal sex. Even, Erik, if you genuinely do feel that my edit was superfluous, it is very poor logic on your part therefore to imagine that it is necessary that you should take it upon yourself to revert it without first discussing it with me. LaFoiblesse 2009-04-20 00h10 (British Summer Time) —Preceding undated comment added 23:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC).

I would imagine that if two women did engage in anal sex, then one would be able legitimately to describe them using the terms in question from the article. I just didn't feel the word "male" added anything except padding. Anyway, it's your call.

LaFoiblesse ( talk) 21:41, 21 April 2009 (GMT)

Hello and greetings. I have created my first article and i am new to it. You would be a great help if you explain to me how come my article should be deleted as i said i was not finished. Thank you very much and looking foward to your reply.-- HENRY V OF ENGLAND ( talk) 22:46, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

isn't nonsense. I don;t know why you tagged it as such. duplicates other articles, and i would need a great ddeal of work, but that's another matter. DGG ( talk) 23:16, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Hello ErikTheBikeMan, Thank you for your vote here. It looks like you were not looged in to Commons. and you vote recorded as a vote from IP address. May I please ask you to log in to Commons and vote one more time. Thank you.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 00:24, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 04:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I understand you are the mediator involved in this case. Are you aware of this ANI discussion? I am reviewing the matter as regards the ANI discussion, and would ask you if you could respond on the ANI discussion as to what your consideration of how the mediation is/was proceeding - I specifically wish to know if it had stalled. Thanks, LessHeard vanU ( talk) 20:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I've responded to your post in the Daybreak article discussion, addressing an assumption you might have made that was inaccurate. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 20:59, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello ErikTheBikeMan, Thank you for your vote here. It looks like you were not looged in to Commons. and you vote recorded as a vote from IP address. May I please ask you to log in to Commons and vote one more time. If you have not voted for this image, please say so. Your vote is very important.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 02:35, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

wrt Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2009-04-23/List of Craigslist killers. :^) ↜Just M E  here , now 18:53, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 22:59, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

If you have been on, you might not have noticed that Slamburger is back at the medation at Talk:List of Avengers members#General Discussion since he announced he wasn't coming back. In addition, another user, LobtsterJ, has joined the fray. I trying to stay civil but their uncivility is grating. Spshu ( talk) 15:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 21:46, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 12:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:31, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 22:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 22:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

FYI, you reviewed a GAN by Zithan ( talk · contribs) a sockpuppet of the crat/OS Nichalp used to write spam articles for clients in return for pay. Although he has now blanked the identifying stuff I still have screenshots of it [1]. Talk:Qualifying_Industrial_Zone/GA1. You might want to be careful as in one paid article Zithan wrote, all the frauds/violations of corporate law committed by the client was omitted YellowMonkey ( cricket calendar poll!) 01:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 11:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 02:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

-- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 02:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

I have stated my arguments for the Graveyard (band) article that you nominated for deletion. Hammer of the Gods27 ( talk) 23:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 01:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi, if you are assessing article stubs, e.g Iranian villages can you please add class=stub to the parameter? It just saves times later in having to reassess them. Thanks, Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 18:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

The June 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 08:27, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

ErikTheBikeMan, please inform me why you feel this page I created for Imagine LSRV is made up. I understand that Google does not show any information about it on its searches yet. However, after a quick search you will be able to find information about this vehicle and its very real presence. I would like to point out that Wikipedia currently has pages on other land speed record projects that are only concepts without a vehicle produced (i.e Bloddhound SSC) and I would like to know why those are still on Wikipedia and I continually have to fight for my pages. Thanks for your time. Tstakes ( talk) 05:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 02:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 22:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

YOUR AN ASS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dzthunda ( talk • contribs) 00:57, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 09:04, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

The July 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 00:53, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 04:09, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 19:28, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:28, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 01:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 05:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 04:09, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

I saw that; doggoned bug in the system.  :) Not to worry. Thanks for letting me know. Best, PMDrive1061 ( talk) 02:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

I saw from here that it's been exactly one year since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ  ^talk/ _contribs 05:58, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

The August 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 03:46, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 16:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,   Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 19:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,   Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

---

---

The September 2009 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next six months; members can still nominate themselves if interested. Please vote here by September 28! This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 01:44, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 23:46, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

The September 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 06:29, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 05:58, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 18:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 18:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC)