{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 21:09, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 17:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
EmilCioran1195 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
what "ARBPIA and NPA violations" have I supposedly committed? I haven't edited a single article on the Arab-Israeli Conflict. And if calling someone biased after them calling me biased is a "Personal Attack", then shouldn't the other user be blocked too? Surely for a 2-week block an admin has to provide diffs? This admin is clearly involved in the dispute, and has a habit of showing up wherever I edit... not even edit, but simply comment on a Talk page. And blocked for 2 weeks, for my contributions on this Talk Page? /info/en/?search=Talk:Eva_Bartlett EmilCioran1195 ( talk) 06:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This appeal has been declined at AE.} Seraphimblade Talk to me 22:25, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Again, this is an Arbitration enforcement block — the guide as to how to construct an AE appeal is on that page. The charge that I am involved in the dispute is groundless. I am not. But I am the uninvolved admin who indefinitely semiprotected the article, so of course it would make sense that I'd keep an eye on it, although actually I wasn't — I was pinged by Drmies. El_C 00:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
"I haven't edited a single article on the Arab-Israeli Conflict." EmilCioran1195, the ARBPIA sanctions extend to talkpages as well as actual articles (see WP:ARBPIA4). ← ZScarpia 13:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found here. According to the procedures, a "clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved administrators" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action.
To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see WP:UNINVOLVED).
what "ARBPIA and NPA violations" have I supposedly committed? I haven't edited a single article on the Arab-Israeli Conflict. And if calling someone biased after them calling me biased is a "Personal Attack", then shouldn't the other user be blocked too? Surely for a 2-week block an admin has to provide diffs? This admin is clearly involved in the dispute, and has a habit of showing up wherever I edit... not even edit, but simply comment on a Talk page. And blocked for 2 weeks, for my contributions on this Talk Page? /info/en/?search=Talk:Eva_Bartlett EmilCioran1195 (talk) 06:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab–Israeli conflict.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 21:09, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 17:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
EmilCioran1195 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
what "ARBPIA and NPA violations" have I supposedly committed? I haven't edited a single article on the Arab-Israeli Conflict. And if calling someone biased after them calling me biased is a "Personal Attack", then shouldn't the other user be blocked too? Surely for a 2-week block an admin has to provide diffs? This admin is clearly involved in the dispute, and has a habit of showing up wherever I edit... not even edit, but simply comment on a Talk page. And blocked for 2 weeks, for my contributions on this Talk Page? /info/en/?search=Talk:Eva_Bartlett EmilCioran1195 ( talk) 06:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This appeal has been declined at AE.} Seraphimblade Talk to me 22:25, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Again, this is an Arbitration enforcement block — the guide as to how to construct an AE appeal is on that page. The charge that I am involved in the dispute is groundless. I am not. But I am the uninvolved admin who indefinitely semiprotected the article, so of course it would make sense that I'd keep an eye on it, although actually I wasn't — I was pinged by Drmies. El_C 00:08, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
"I haven't edited a single article on the Arab-Israeli Conflict." EmilCioran1195, the ARBPIA sanctions extend to talkpages as well as actual articles (see WP:ARBPIA4). ← ZScarpia 13:20, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Procedural notes: The rules governing arbitration enforcement appeals are found here. According to the procedures, a "clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved administrators" is required to overturn an arbitration enforcement action.
To help determine any such consensus, involved editors may make brief statements in separate sections but should not edit the section for discussion among uninvolved editors. Editors are normally considered involved if they are in a current dispute with the sanctioning or sanctioned editor, or have taken part in disputes (if any) related to the contested enforcement action. Administrators having taken administrative actions are not normally considered involved for this reason alone (see WP:UNINVOLVED).
what "ARBPIA and NPA violations" have I supposedly committed? I haven't edited a single article on the Arab-Israeli Conflict. And if calling someone biased after them calling me biased is a "Personal Attack", then shouldn't the other user be blocked too? Surely for a 2-week block an admin has to provide diffs? This admin is clearly involved in the dispute, and has a habit of showing up wherever I edit... not even edit, but simply comment on a Talk page. And blocked for 2 weeks, for my contributions on this Talk Page? /info/en/?search=Talk:Eva_Bartlett EmilCioran1195 (talk) 06:21, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab–Israeli conflict.