Hello, Earthianyogi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
(Part of a larger guide on various issues new users face).
If you're going to write an article about anyone or anything that is not you or something you are connected to, here are the steps you should follow:
Doing something besides those steps typically results in the article not being approved, or even in its deletion.
If you are writing about yourself, or someone or something you are connected with (such as a friend, family member, or your business), the following steps are different:
Ian.thomson ( talk) 01:35, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
{{
request edit}}
" followed with "please add the following material to the article" along with the material you would have added in step 8. That way, another editor without a conflict of interest will either carry out the edits or else explain how to what problems prevent them from being carried out in their current form.
Ian.thomson (
talk) 09:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:PET for Bone Imaging, from its old location at User:Earthianyogi/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy ( talk) 05:16, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Earthianyogi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hi, I was trying to send you the Zoom link for today's meetup but it seems you don't have email enabled on Wikipedia. Can you get in touch with me at thewub.wiki@googlemail.com and I'll send it over. the wub "?!" 12:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Accept my appologies, I could not attend. Hope the meeting went well. Cheers Earthianyogi ( talk) 20:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
-- RoySmith (talk) 21:16, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Do you work for, or have some association with the British Nuclear Medicine Society? ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 19:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Earthianyogi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hi Earthianyogi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hello, Earthianyogi!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Atlantic306 (
talk) 18:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
|
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:42, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Spicy ( talk) 19:54, 6 June 2020 (UTC)Hello, Earthianyogi
Thank you for creating Ignac Fogelman.
User:Spicy, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Consider adding a "Selected publications" section with his 5 most highly cited papers/books.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Spicy}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Spicy ( talk) 19:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
@ Spicy:, Hello, I have the section, as suggested. Thanks Earthianyogi ( talk) 20:36, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Earthianyogi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hello Earthianyogi, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 14:49, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Fiddle Faddle 16:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Nuclear Medicine Communications, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty ( talk) 09:18, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi
Randykitty, I see that you have added a speedy deletion tag to this page. I have removed advert material from
Nuclear medicine communication after reading some content written by yourself as well. You appear to be a very experienced editor. Could you suggest improvements so that the page is not deleted? Thx
Earthianyogi (
talk) 10:15, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
MurielMary ( talk) 12:38, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Please let me know why is this not enough? Thanks Earthianyogi ( talk) 10:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.I didn’t see any
majorsources showing this. Eternal Shadow Talk 15:06, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
1. The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources. --She has 7 patents, published more than 162 scientific documents with 2487 citations, and an h-index of 26
2. The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers). --Fellow of Academy of Dental Materials (FADM). --Chair: Royal Society of Chemistry: Biomaterials Chemistry interest group.
3. The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. --She has published more than 162 scientific documents with 2487 citations, and an h-index of 26
4. The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon. --She is a Professor at King's Collge London.
5. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society. --Ex-president: UK Society of Biomaterials. --Secretary: UK Society for Biomaterials.
6. The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area. --She is an editor to various scientific national and international journals, for example, Journal of Biomaterials Application (Associate editor), Journal of Tissue Science & Engineering (Associate editor), and Journal of the American Ceramic Society (Guest editor).
Earthianyogi ( talk) 15:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong ( talk) 19:59, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Hello, please do not add very broad categories to articles, as you did at Ilina Singh, Shanta Persaud, Sanjukta Deb, and others. Categorization on English Wikipedia is governed by several guidelines: Wikipedia:Categorization, Wikipedia:Overcategorization. — andrybak ( talk) 10:29, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello : Andrybak, thanks for pointing out and introducing me to the guidelines. I will read and try to follow. Thank you Earthianyogi ( talk) 10:40, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The best way to get an article accepted through AfC is by sourcing every sentence with a citation from a reliable source and expanding the article so that the sourcing is adequate. Also on a side note please do NOT use extra headers at the bottom for notifying the reviewers that you improved the article as suggested and use the talk page if need be. Eternal Shadow Talk 16:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Eternal Shadow Talk 17:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Hi Earthianyogi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hi Earthianyogi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Draft talk:Kawal Rhode does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Many/most of the articles you have created about academics suffer the same weaknesses at the one for Rhodes. Even though most have been accepted, in my opinion they do not confirm notability, and if I was in a mean mood I would nominate all of them for deletion. How much a professor was awarded in grants, how many grad student degrees they oversaw, their articles being cited - none of that conveys notability. Academics doing what is expected of academics is not Wikipedia notability. David notMD ( talk) 22:13, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
I have been discussing the ideas with others on the notability's talk page, and feel that maybe I can present a slightly less biased view of the two sides, which I will as soon as I get time.
Also, concerning Kawal's draft, I found a few media-articles talking about him, which I have referenced within the article. Please note that I do not care if the article gets in or not, but I struggle with situations when an article appears to meets the criteria, but I am told that it does not.
IN regards to WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, I am not saying that include this article on the basis that other non-sense exits on Wiki. On the contrary, I am saying, if this draft is non-sense, it should go, and so do the other articles that are one-liners, and not satisfy the Wiki notability criteria.
I hope you read David notMD ideas, which I beg to differ with, as the other people meet the awards criteria, or the chief-editor criteria, or edited books that are used in university criteria within WP:PROF. If you negate the whole WP:PROF guidelines itself, then I am left with nothing to talk. Earthianyogi ( talk) 14:34, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
That said, it is not wise to submit articles on academic people or on anything else that meet onl the bare minimum. There should be some attempt to do what an encyclopedia is supposed to do, which is to provide information. .One-sentence bios are more suitable for a bigraphical dictionary than an encyclopedia.
I will check other articles and submissions of yours, and also any academic bio articles that have been deleted or declined by some of the other people in the discussion. If any of your work is challenged on these grounds please let me know--if I think the notability is clear enough I will try to help. DGG ( talk ) 06:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
TJMSmith ( talk) 18:44, 24 July 2020 (UTC)Hi Earthianyogi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hi! I wanted to take a moment and explain at a little more length why I removed the citation counts from the H. Ray Dunning article. As I said in the edit summary, one reason is that they don't help establish notability in this case. As areas in the humanities tend to have low citation rates, WP:NAUTHOR tends to be more relevant than WP:NPROF. I don't think exact numbers belong anyway, since they're likely to be out-of-date. And the counts were not referenced.
In a case where someone is mainly notable for a few works, and you don't have another assertion to notability in the article, then I'd suggest including in the article text something like "This work has been cited over 100 times", with a citation to their Google Scholar (or in a pinch, to the GS identifier of the article). Note that you're not supposed to include references to searches in Wikipedia articles, but I think looking an article up by ID is ok.
An additional comment on your edits to that article. I'm not sure it adds very much to have a book in the list of books, and also in the references. I'd suggest cutting out the citation there. (As long as you include the ISBN number, the book is self-verifying.) As it's also not doing any harm, though, I left it alone. Russ Woodroofe ( talk) 18:09, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
I conclude he's an important writer of academc books in theology.I consider this enough for notability. DGG ( talk ) 05:49, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
MurielMary ( talk) 09:23, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Hello, Earthianyogi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Copulas in signal processing".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:27, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Earthianyogi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " EJNMMI Research".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 17:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Earthianyogi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Medical Physics Expert".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 17:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Earthianyogi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Anna Tarkowska".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Earthianyogi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Copula".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 19:32, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Earthianyogi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Archana Singh-Manoux, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 02:04, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission: I see this has already been revised by an expert. I think the merge will be best done after the material is in mainspace, and so I intend to accept it.
. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 00:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
DGG ( talk ) 00:24, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Earthianyogi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
(Part of a larger guide on various issues new users face).
If you're going to write an article about anyone or anything that is not you or something you are connected to, here are the steps you should follow:
Doing something besides those steps typically results in the article not being approved, or even in its deletion.
If you are writing about yourself, or someone or something you are connected with (such as a friend, family member, or your business), the following steps are different:
Ian.thomson ( talk) 01:35, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
{{
request edit}}
" followed with "please add the following material to the article" along with the material you would have added in step 8. That way, another editor without a conflict of interest will either carry out the edits or else explain how to what problems prevent them from being carried out in their current form.
Ian.thomson (
talk) 09:38, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:PET for Bone Imaging, from its old location at User:Earthianyogi/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy ( talk) 05:16, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Earthianyogi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hi, I was trying to send you the Zoom link for today's meetup but it seems you don't have email enabled on Wikipedia. Can you get in touch with me at thewub.wiki@googlemail.com and I'll send it over. the wub "?!" 12:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi, Accept my appologies, I could not attend. Hope the meeting went well. Cheers Earthianyogi ( talk) 20:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
-- RoySmith (talk) 21:16, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Do you work for, or have some association with the British Nuclear Medicine Society? ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 19:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Earthianyogi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hi Earthianyogi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hello, Earthianyogi!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Atlantic306 (
talk) 18:15, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
|
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Atlantic306 ( talk) 22:42, 5 June 2020 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Spicy ( talk) 19:54, 6 June 2020 (UTC)Hello, Earthianyogi
Thank you for creating Ignac Fogelman.
User:Spicy, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Consider adding a "Selected publications" section with his 5 most highly cited papers/books.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Spicy}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Spicy ( talk) 19:56, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
@ Spicy:, Hello, I have the section, as suggested. Thanks Earthianyogi ( talk) 20:36, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Earthianyogi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hello Earthianyogi, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 14:49, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Fiddle Faddle 16:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Nuclear Medicine Communications, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty ( talk) 09:18, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi
Randykitty, I see that you have added a speedy deletion tag to this page. I have removed advert material from
Nuclear medicine communication after reading some content written by yourself as well. You appear to be a very experienced editor. Could you suggest improvements so that the page is not deleted? Thx
Earthianyogi (
talk) 10:15, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
MurielMary ( talk) 12:38, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Please let me know why is this not enough? Thanks Earthianyogi ( talk) 10:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.I didn’t see any
majorsources showing this. Eternal Shadow Talk 15:06, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
1. The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources. --She has 7 patents, published more than 162 scientific documents with 2487 citations, and an h-index of 26
2. The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers). --Fellow of Academy of Dental Materials (FADM). --Chair: Royal Society of Chemistry: Biomaterials Chemistry interest group.
3. The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. --She has published more than 162 scientific documents with 2487 citations, and an h-index of 26
4. The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon. --She is a Professor at King's Collge London.
5. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society. --Ex-president: UK Society of Biomaterials. --Secretary: UK Society for Biomaterials.
6. The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area. --She is an editor to various scientific national and international journals, for example, Journal of Biomaterials Application (Associate editor), Journal of Tissue Science & Engineering (Associate editor), and Journal of the American Ceramic Society (Guest editor).
Earthianyogi ( talk) 15:27, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Theroadislong ( talk) 19:59, 20 July 2020 (UTC)Hello, please do not add very broad categories to articles, as you did at Ilina Singh, Shanta Persaud, Sanjukta Deb, and others. Categorization on English Wikipedia is governed by several guidelines: Wikipedia:Categorization, Wikipedia:Overcategorization. — andrybak ( talk) 10:29, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello : Andrybak, thanks for pointing out and introducing me to the guidelines. I will read and try to follow. Thank you Earthianyogi ( talk) 10:40, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
The best way to get an article accepted through AfC is by sourcing every sentence with a citation from a reliable source and expanding the article so that the sourcing is adequate. Also on a side note please do NOT use extra headers at the bottom for notifying the reviewers that you improved the article as suggested and use the talk page if need be. Eternal Shadow Talk 16:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Eternal Shadow Talk 17:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)Hi Earthianyogi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hi Earthianyogi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
I noticed your recent edit to Draft talk:Kawal Rhode does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Chris Troutman ( talk) 20:44, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Many/most of the articles you have created about academics suffer the same weaknesses at the one for Rhodes. Even though most have been accepted, in my opinion they do not confirm notability, and if I was in a mean mood I would nominate all of them for deletion. How much a professor was awarded in grants, how many grad student degrees they oversaw, their articles being cited - none of that conveys notability. Academics doing what is expected of academics is not Wikipedia notability. David notMD ( talk) 22:13, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
I have been discussing the ideas with others on the notability's talk page, and feel that maybe I can present a slightly less biased view of the two sides, which I will as soon as I get time.
Also, concerning Kawal's draft, I found a few media-articles talking about him, which I have referenced within the article. Please note that I do not care if the article gets in or not, but I struggle with situations when an article appears to meets the criteria, but I am told that it does not.
IN regards to WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, I am not saying that include this article on the basis that other non-sense exits on Wiki. On the contrary, I am saying, if this draft is non-sense, it should go, and so do the other articles that are one-liners, and not satisfy the Wiki notability criteria.
I hope you read David notMD ideas, which I beg to differ with, as the other people meet the awards criteria, or the chief-editor criteria, or edited books that are used in university criteria within WP:PROF. If you negate the whole WP:PROF guidelines itself, then I am left with nothing to talk. Earthianyogi ( talk) 14:34, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
That said, it is not wise to submit articles on academic people or on anything else that meet onl the bare minimum. There should be some attempt to do what an encyclopedia is supposed to do, which is to provide information. .One-sentence bios are more suitable for a bigraphical dictionary than an encyclopedia.
I will check other articles and submissions of yours, and also any academic bio articles that have been deleted or declined by some of the other people in the discussion. If any of your work is challenged on these grounds please let me know--if I think the notability is clear enough I will try to help. DGG ( talk ) 06:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
TJMSmith ( talk) 18:44, 24 July 2020 (UTC)Hi Earthianyogi! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hi! I wanted to take a moment and explain at a little more length why I removed the citation counts from the H. Ray Dunning article. As I said in the edit summary, one reason is that they don't help establish notability in this case. As areas in the humanities tend to have low citation rates, WP:NAUTHOR tends to be more relevant than WP:NPROF. I don't think exact numbers belong anyway, since they're likely to be out-of-date. And the counts were not referenced.
In a case where someone is mainly notable for a few works, and you don't have another assertion to notability in the article, then I'd suggest including in the article text something like "This work has been cited over 100 times", with a citation to their Google Scholar (or in a pinch, to the GS identifier of the article). Note that you're not supposed to include references to searches in Wikipedia articles, but I think looking an article up by ID is ok.
An additional comment on your edits to that article. I'm not sure it adds very much to have a book in the list of books, and also in the references. I'd suggest cutting out the citation there. (As long as you include the ISBN number, the book is self-verifying.) As it's also not doing any harm, though, I left it alone. Russ Woodroofe ( talk) 18:09, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
I conclude he's an important writer of academc books in theology.I consider this enough for notability. DGG ( talk ) 05:49, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
MurielMary ( talk) 09:23, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Hello, Earthianyogi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Copulas in signal processing".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:27, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Earthianyogi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " EJNMMI Research".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 17:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Earthianyogi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Medical Physics Expert".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 17:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Earthianyogi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Anna Tarkowska".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Earthianyogi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Copula".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 19:32, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Earthianyogi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Archana Singh-Manoux, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 02:04, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission: I see this has already been revised by an expert. I think the merge will be best done after the material is in mainspace, and so I intend to accept it.
. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 00:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
DGG ( talk ) 00:24, 9 September 2021 (UTC)Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)