This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, DoRD! You blocked TrippingHippy ( talk · contribs) per {{ checkuserblock-account}} and he is now requesting that block be lifted. Your input on his talk page and any information you can provide/confirm would be appreciated. Thanks! -- auburnpilot talk 21:14, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
You removed my ip block exemption last month and I not really sure why. I frequently edit from a public library system which has nearly 30 separate branches and is constantly being blocked for one reason or another. I was just fine and everything was working out great until you removed it. I shouldn't have to reapply for block exemption every month. Please can you put this back. I was very frustrated to find out I couldn't edit last week. JOJ Hutton 17:29, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
This user has been vandalizing Por Ella Soy Eva and Corona de lágrimas (2012 telenovela). (s)he thinks that the former didn't win Best Telenovela while the latter did, even though the source provided states that PESE did in fact win Best Telenovela while CDL didn't. I've warned him 3 times, yet (s)he continues to revert my edits. Platinum Star ( talk) 00:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello there! Just wanted to know why Archangel Shemjaza was blocked. Regards, (give me a TB) FoCuSandLeArN ( talk) 01:40, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for rapid attention to The Deadly TV series SPI. I'm disappointed, I did think he had stopped, but it seems he has simply dropped the particular names I was using for searches. The name "Jaybias farts allot" suggests his little friends are joining in.
On another matter: please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive795#IP genre waring, about floods of genre-war vandalism. I did a 3-day rangeblock of 46.159.0.0/16 which expires at 22:25 tonight, but Idid not like to do a longer block of so large a range, and would like your advice about a longer block if the nuisance re-starts. I cannot make the contributions search for a range work, for some reason: I have the gadget enabled, and have tried both 46.159.0.0/16 and 46.159.*.* in the search box with no result. The addresses given are at Krasnodar in Russia, so collateral damage on en:wp would be less than if it was an English-speaking country. JohnCD ( talk) 14:21, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you have blocked User:Alexander585. I would like to ask whether it is worthy to open an SPI case against a new user ( Badbuu1000) whom I suspect to be a sockpuppet of Alexander585. The editing pattern of the two users seems to be the same. -- Omnipaedista ( talk) 21:55, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
There are growing concerns that Amiram Goldblum is himself editing the article about him. He has two accounts: User:Rastiniak and User:רסטיניאק. Take a look at the this sockpuppet investigation. Also, read the following discussion. רסטיניאק has removed the POV tag from the article twice so far: 1 and 2. While I don't find this subject particularly interesting, I'm alarmed by the fact that Goldblum is fighting tooth and nail to get users who question the neutrality of his article to get blocked. I request you to help us determine whether the two accounts indeed belong to Goldblum. Nataev ( talk) 11:28, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. You commented on this user's unblock request a few days back. I wondered if you wanted to finish that up or if you'd like someone else to take it. Thanks. Danger High voltage! 03:36, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48791 — Kww( talk) 17:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
It looks like Mangoeater is back again: User:Bardsteem. ElKevbo ( talk) 23:59, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello! I noticed that your an admin. I suspected this User:Vladismeer is using a lot of accounts, User:KylaDee, User:Khelty, User:Entertainmentph. The editing pattern of the seems to be the same. He/she made multiple accounts to make it look like someone is agreeing/defending his edits. He keep on insisting very false information and adding original info. I'm not that much knowledgeable on what to do with this case, so I reported it to an expert or admin. like you to with this kind of matter. :D Thank You!-- Merida08 ( talk) 18:35, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. You commented here about User:ExcuseMeNYC and the range block of their IPs. User:Diannaa blocked the range for a week on 3 June. Can you see if the newly created obvious sock User:Brathford6602 is editing from the same range? If so, how were they able to edit..? Doesn't the range block extend to name accounts? Can the blocks be improved in some way, to stop the person creating new socks? Or make it a little harder, at least. (I have a fair idea of who the real person may be, and I don't believe they're any more technically savvy than I am. Or maybe a little. Most people are, a little.) Bishonen | talk 22:07, 6 June 2013 (UTC).
Hi, You recently blocked the above user. There is some curiosity as to whose sock he is, can you comment here? Thanks. μηδείς ( talk) 00:34, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
Hi DoRD, could you check & block the underlying IP for User:Michol772 et al? As you can see by looking at the log for edit filter 527, this IP tried to create over 100 spambot accounts last night (but was stopped by the software at the usual 6 accounts). Thanks, NawlinWiki ( talk) 12:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi DoRD, could you help out there? There's a huge, huge backlog of 20-over articles, and some from yesterday are still unreviewed. Thanks.
Arctic Kangaroo (
✉ •
✎) 14:46, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Welcome back from your vacation. I hope you had a good one. Have you had a chance to look at the QuickSPI on the spammer I've been tracking? -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 03:26, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
They're back. =\
-- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 04:08, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Uh huh, more...
-- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 04:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
I have no idea what's going on here, so I thought I better ask. Smallbones( smalltalk) 04:49, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
After a question on my talk page, I started User:Dennis Brown/Dealing with sockpuppets with the goal of making a plain english "how to" guide for regular editors. The goal is to keep it simple, show them how and when to strike, and what NOT to do as much as what to do. You are pretty good at this stuff, and your input would be appreciated. I would like to move to meta-space (maybe WP:SOCKFIX or similar) after it is usable, something we can link sometimes when needed after a block to help the editors understand what they should and shouldn't do. Mainly for striking and to discourage random tagging. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 01:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
I represent a company that provides solutions for farmers and their problems with crop diseases and other related issues. There is not a promotional or sales side to why we would like to create this page, it's simply to help link fungicides to our page. It has been seen with other competitor products and we would like to add to the list of options that the views of Wikipedia can access. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.169.247.190 ( talk) 16:58, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
I've been working on User:Dennis Brown/Dealing with sock puppets with the goal of moving into meta space soon. Basically a guide for newish users that covers the basics, written in a style any editor can understand. Your input on the page/talk page is welcomed. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 14:17, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
DoRD, could you please take a look at User:Duniyaduniya, from a Checkuser perspective? I am fairly certain this is the same person as User:JohnnyOrgseed, based on the fact that they uploaded the same sets of images and are edit warring them to add to articles (see, for example, the history of Aztec). The reason I'm asking here is because you block JohnyyOrgseed as a checkuser block, but there's no indication of who the master is. Qwyrxian ( talk) 14:11, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi DoRD, you are invited to participate in this discussion. Please note that participation is optional and the discussion closes at 12:15am sharp tonight (GMT+8). Cheers. -- Arctic Kangaroo ( ✉ • ✎) 14:31, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
I'm a bit confused as to how answer the last question by this account. I read the checkuser block section, and it seems to indicate that a user cannot appeal. An administrator has to first question the block and then follow the process outlined in the section. Is that correct, or could the user simply e-mail an appeal to arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org? Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 01:11, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Just some comments about him and the block. Arctic Kangaroo ( ✉ • ✎) 02:58, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey, DoRD! Could you assist me with the request I made of Alison at User talk:Alison#Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DragoLink08? It seems she's too busy to respond. Following a block on a range belonging to USF, one of their network guys contacted me and we've been working to eliminate the disruption on their end. Per their request, I need to be able to pass along the IP used by the most recent sock puppet ( Biggerandbetterthings) so they can take the next step. I'm not familiar with the correct procedure in obtaining this information but believe it is a valid request per Wikipedia:CheckUser#CheckUser and privacy policy #4, bullet point 2. Thanks! -- auburnpilot talk 00:25, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
You recently blocked Pams Ale House ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) with a checkuser block. I just tagged Samesex Marriage78 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) as a suspected sock of PAH, but it appears that PAH is not the sock master. Can you take a look and change my tag as/if appropriate? Toddst1 ( talk) 18:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Is the recently created DoRD2 ( talk · contribs) an alternative account of yours? If not, and they don't put in a username change request within 24 hours, feel free to block them if no one else has. Daniel Case ( talk) 14:50, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
I am astonished to see that I am accused of being a sockpuppet and blocked. I am even outraged because I feel humiliated with this accusation. An accusation of being "user Brunodam" without proof, even if I offered to submit my personal data. I demand justice. I am going to complain to the "Better Business Bureau of Florida" and to the Police department of Fort Lauderdale, following instructions from my attorney about this clear case of harassment & offense. I will ask for damages. Junior5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.46.252.98 ( talk) 18:56, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure if you're still looking at the SPI since you marked it completed, so I'm mentioning this here too. There's a whole bunch of Niharshah* and Niharsms* accounts, some of which aren't blocked. Are those separate, or did they just get missed? -- 71.199.125.210 ( talk) 03:34, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi DoRD I am picking a few random names from editors who have helped me in the past, hoping that one or more might be around for a quick reply. I seem to have read somewhere that it is against policy to solicit others to join an action. At the same time I have often seen notifications of the type "because you have been involved with this article, we would like to let you know that ..." or something along those lines. Specifically, is it ok/ not ok to solicit others to go vote on a deletion vote? Much appreciated, regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 11:28, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
I hear you on stale accounts, but I wondered if a simple solution to this SPI handicap would be to record for posterity on our servers the first and last IPs an account used before becoming inactive. Perhaps there is some privacy related reason why this is not feasible, but it would solve the problem of not being able to tie a stale sockmaster to their newer socks. Any thoughts? GabeMc ( talk| contribs) 20:28, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
{{ you've got mail}} MikeDS ( talk) 11:13, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I get stalked by sockpuppets not infrequently, so I was...intrigued?...to see that you'd imposed a CU block without any report. Is this another twig of the "deity condemns homosexuality" tree, or a totally separate sockmaster? – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 01:06, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Based on his editing both here an on ruwiki, Ctway appears to at least know Russian fairly well. I was surprised too that in Feb he was blocked from an UK IP. I suppose he is moving between the two countries at times or something like that. Another possibility is that he may have recruited someone to repost that article on one of those Russian gun forums he frequents (and which he frequently links in articles here, usually forum.guns.ru) Someone not using his real name ( talk) 17:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey, DoRD, is there a connection between Mangoeater (see Dreamastir ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Anaaaphid ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)) and Untieailed ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) or Anushka127 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)? This has all mushroomed because of my blocks of Untieailed and Anushka127 for edit warring at Aishwarya Rai Filmography. Anushka127 is making quite a fuss on their talk page, and I'm not familiar with Mangoeater other than by name. Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:55, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
You cleverly detected the sockpuppetry last time around. The indf blocked user has since claimed to be active again and boasted not to have been caught, yet. There is a discussion that Humanpublic and Strangesad may now have exchanged passwords, given the similarity of the edits made from the Strangesad accounts to the lines of reasoning used by Humanpublic before and the editing style. A sleeper type check on these accounts may yet reveal something, in all likelihood. Not here anymore ( talk) 19:01, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello DoRD, I'm convinced that I have found "another" Wiki_brah sock. Should I just post in the relevant SPI page, or can I post the evidence I have put together here? Best, Toccata quarta ( talk) 09:27, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Kgarson ( talk · contribs) with just three edits before today, suddenly pops up and reverted two edits of mine, which were themselves reverts. My two reverts were per WP:SPEEDY "The creator of a page may not remove a speedy deletion tag"; the creator was Chicagoghosttown ( talk · contribs). Do you think there is sufficient evidence to file a WP:SPI connecting Kgarson ( talk · contribs) with Chicagoghosttown ( talk · contribs)? -- Redrose64 ( talk) 20:51, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
...you blocked a number of accounts at As'ad AbuKhalil (with an expiry time of indefinite (checkuserblock-account)). They're the red linked accounts in the page history. There is a new account, Bazinga139, doing exactly the same thing as the previous blocked accounts. Would you be able to have a look at it please ? Sean.hoyland - talk 07:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Senencito is appealing his block. I presume this account is the sockmaster for Reeespecto and LuisDOrtega2, but that's not explicitly tagged or documented anywhere. Can you confirm so I can close out the request? Kuru (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
You take that broom-thing quite to heart. Thanks for cleaning house. Drmies ( talk) 14:22, 7 September 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Just a note to let you know that I relisted Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ElPilotoDi and was hoping for a few clarifications. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 06:34, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I tried to move Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unorginal7 to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HoshiNoKaabii2000 per your request. I thought I handled everything correctly, but my watchlist shows an entry in the deletion log saying that you restored the target page at 22:30 UTC. I can't see anything in the HoshiNoKaabii2000 SPI page's history corresponding to this restore operation, though. I did check the HoshiNoKaabii2000 SPI page before doing the move, and it didn't appear to have anything of substance in it. Nevertheless, if I messed something up, I'd like to know what I did and understand how to avoid it happening again. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 23:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Understood! My apologies for working those the wrong way, I'll send them to AIV from now on, I just didn't want to "report complex abuse" to AIV, which I understand is a no-no, and worried issues like those I reported might have been viewed as such. Thanks for your time and attention! (also, I fixed my signature per your request) besieged talk 21:40, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
I checked the URL you left, and stand corrected. What is the NFL looking at that ranks the Titans 2nd over Indy? Rlchambliss ( talk) 01:32, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
I am concerned by your blocks here to these 6 similarly named accounts. Why did you block the accounts immediately and without warning? And why did you prevent account creation if they were being blocked for their usernames? There are any number of good-faith reasons for similarly named accounts, including workshops and school groups. (Indeed, this was a library training workshop run by METRO). Because you blocked them in this way for no discernible reason, the library was no longer able to edit Wikipedia with the accounts or even create new accounts with more unique names. Dominic· t 19:13, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
You have deleted an IP user page[ [4]] that contained information that is currently involved an ANI dispute.[ [5]] The discussion involves harassment by editors of IP editors. I wasn't sure if you were aware of this involvement. Thank you. 174.118.141.197 ( talk) 05:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Re [6], how could you possibly know there's not a Trojan horse (computing) on the editor's computer? NE Ent 00:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
For help with photo Antiqueight confer 20:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC) |
Hello DoRD! Question: How do I request it from my talk page? Thanks! ///EuroCar GT 13:21, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
By the way, this might be up your alley: Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)#Student_editing_from_an_open_proxy.3F. I've gotten a couple emails about it recently. Biosthmors ( talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{ U}}) while signing a reply, thx 17:42, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to be counted in the poll. The new poll is located at this link. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them at the election commissioners. --For the Election Commissioners, v/r, TParis
Although our last interaction was not pleasant, I acknowledge your statement today: "Colton Cosmic typically signs his non-mainspace edits[2] - is there any evidence that these edits were made by Colton Cosmic? Please note that this is a shared IP." Here is what I just tried to respond there, in the block where it says "the accused party may comment here," but my response was blocked by a filter.
I would like to have this response, my defense, put at the SPI page, but I won't risk actually asking you because I've no reason to think you'll do it. Colton Cosmic.
Hi,
Thanks for your help on
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Evlekis. I imagine that checkusering is mostly dull and thankless, so... I just want to say that it's appreciated. You rock. Although some of those accounts were quite active so I have a lot of cleanup to do!
bobrayner (
talk) 18:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Now that you've blocked the sock accounts, can you see any reason for keeping Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/New life88/User YDP and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/New life88/YDP? Both pages were validly deleted, and I restored them solely for the sake of non-admins participating in the SPI. Nyttend ( talk) 20:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
You have completely altered the intent of my report. It is the IP who is clearly the originator. You have removed any reference to it. Leaky Caldron 13:46, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Would you mind running a quick checkuser on Osarius? This is a WP:SPI#Quick CheckUser requests situation, but I'm making it privately because I'm about to go on the road with family, and I'd like to respond to Osarius before I leave instead of waiting for someone to check the SPI page. Osarius has seemingly been caught in an autoblock, and I'm inclined to grant IPBE at his request; I just want to make sure that everything's clear to grant the right. Please leave me a talkback, and if I don't respond quickly (I don't know when I'm leaving; I'm not the driver), I'd appreciate it if you'd grant the right or deny the unblock request. Nyttend ( talk) 14:50, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I am suspicious that giatharodaki has built a new account named Daki122,I request a checkuser,I am sure the account is a sock puppet. Alhanuty ( talk) 22:01, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
I have just filed a report about his new account Daki122. Alhanuty ( talk) 22:01, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
The report has been out for three days and nobody is responding or using the checkuser to confirm that Daki122 is a sockpuppet. Alhanuty ( talk) 18:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
To DoRD, for diligently and quietly updating the functionary activity statistics, I award this Admin's Barnstar. Thank you for all your work! AGK [•] 11:48, 2 December 2013 (UTC) |
Hi DoRD. Would you mind taking a look at WilliamH's block of the 68.247.0.0/16 range here? I'm currently looking into an unblock request from User:Etonmessisthebest, who's caught in that particular rangeblock. Please could you amend the block to remove autoblock or grant him IP exemption if you deem it wise? Cheers, Yunshui 雲 水 09:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, DoRD! You blocked TrippingHippy ( talk · contribs) per {{ checkuserblock-account}} and he is now requesting that block be lifted. Your input on his talk page and any information you can provide/confirm would be appreciated. Thanks! -- auburnpilot talk 21:14, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
You removed my ip block exemption last month and I not really sure why. I frequently edit from a public library system which has nearly 30 separate branches and is constantly being blocked for one reason or another. I was just fine and everything was working out great until you removed it. I shouldn't have to reapply for block exemption every month. Please can you put this back. I was very frustrated to find out I couldn't edit last week. JOJ Hutton 17:29, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
This user has been vandalizing Por Ella Soy Eva and Corona de lágrimas (2012 telenovela). (s)he thinks that the former didn't win Best Telenovela while the latter did, even though the source provided states that PESE did in fact win Best Telenovela while CDL didn't. I've warned him 3 times, yet (s)he continues to revert my edits. Platinum Star ( talk) 00:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello there! Just wanted to know why Archangel Shemjaza was blocked. Regards, (give me a TB) FoCuSandLeArN ( talk) 01:40, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for rapid attention to The Deadly TV series SPI. I'm disappointed, I did think he had stopped, but it seems he has simply dropped the particular names I was using for searches. The name "Jaybias farts allot" suggests his little friends are joining in.
On another matter: please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive795#IP genre waring, about floods of genre-war vandalism. I did a 3-day rangeblock of 46.159.0.0/16 which expires at 22:25 tonight, but Idid not like to do a longer block of so large a range, and would like your advice about a longer block if the nuisance re-starts. I cannot make the contributions search for a range work, for some reason: I have the gadget enabled, and have tried both 46.159.0.0/16 and 46.159.*.* in the search box with no result. The addresses given are at Krasnodar in Russia, so collateral damage on en:wp would be less than if it was an English-speaking country. JohnCD ( talk) 14:21, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you have blocked User:Alexander585. I would like to ask whether it is worthy to open an SPI case against a new user ( Badbuu1000) whom I suspect to be a sockpuppet of Alexander585. The editing pattern of the two users seems to be the same. -- Omnipaedista ( talk) 21:55, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
There are growing concerns that Amiram Goldblum is himself editing the article about him. He has two accounts: User:Rastiniak and User:רסטיניאק. Take a look at the this sockpuppet investigation. Also, read the following discussion. רסטיניאק has removed the POV tag from the article twice so far: 1 and 2. While I don't find this subject particularly interesting, I'm alarmed by the fact that Goldblum is fighting tooth and nail to get users who question the neutrality of his article to get blocked. I request you to help us determine whether the two accounts indeed belong to Goldblum. Nataev ( talk) 11:28, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. You commented on this user's unblock request a few days back. I wondered if you wanted to finish that up or if you'd like someone else to take it. Thanks. Danger High voltage! 03:36, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48791 — Kww( talk) 17:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
It looks like Mangoeater is back again: User:Bardsteem. ElKevbo ( talk) 23:59, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello! I noticed that your an admin. I suspected this User:Vladismeer is using a lot of accounts, User:KylaDee, User:Khelty, User:Entertainmentph. The editing pattern of the seems to be the same. He/she made multiple accounts to make it look like someone is agreeing/defending his edits. He keep on insisting very false information and adding original info. I'm not that much knowledgeable on what to do with this case, so I reported it to an expert or admin. like you to with this kind of matter. :D Thank You!-- Merida08 ( talk) 18:35, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. You commented here about User:ExcuseMeNYC and the range block of their IPs. User:Diannaa blocked the range for a week on 3 June. Can you see if the newly created obvious sock User:Brathford6602 is editing from the same range? If so, how were they able to edit..? Doesn't the range block extend to name accounts? Can the blocks be improved in some way, to stop the person creating new socks? Or make it a little harder, at least. (I have a fair idea of who the real person may be, and I don't believe they're any more technically savvy than I am. Or maybe a little. Most people are, a little.) Bishonen | talk 22:07, 6 June 2013 (UTC).
Hi, You recently blocked the above user. There is some curiosity as to whose sock he is, can you comment here? Thanks. μηδείς ( talk) 00:34, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
Hi DoRD, could you check & block the underlying IP for User:Michol772 et al? As you can see by looking at the log for edit filter 527, this IP tried to create over 100 spambot accounts last night (but was stopped by the software at the usual 6 accounts). Thanks, NawlinWiki ( talk) 12:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi DoRD, could you help out there? There's a huge, huge backlog of 20-over articles, and some from yesterday are still unreviewed. Thanks.
Arctic Kangaroo (
✉ •
✎) 14:46, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Welcome back from your vacation. I hope you had a good one. Have you had a chance to look at the QuickSPI on the spammer I've been tracking? -- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 03:26, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
They're back. =\
-- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 04:08, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Uh huh, more...
-- Gogo Dodo ( talk) 04:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
I have no idea what's going on here, so I thought I better ask. Smallbones( smalltalk) 04:49, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
After a question on my talk page, I started User:Dennis Brown/Dealing with sockpuppets with the goal of making a plain english "how to" guide for regular editors. The goal is to keep it simple, show them how and when to strike, and what NOT to do as much as what to do. You are pretty good at this stuff, and your input would be appreciated. I would like to move to meta-space (maybe WP:SOCKFIX or similar) after it is usable, something we can link sometimes when needed after a block to help the editors understand what they should and shouldn't do. Mainly for striking and to discourage random tagging. Dennis Brown / 2¢ / © / @ 01:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
I represent a company that provides solutions for farmers and their problems with crop diseases and other related issues. There is not a promotional or sales side to why we would like to create this page, it's simply to help link fungicides to our page. It has been seen with other competitor products and we would like to add to the list of options that the views of Wikipedia can access. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.169.247.190 ( talk) 16:58, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
I've been working on User:Dennis Brown/Dealing with sock puppets with the goal of moving into meta space soon. Basically a guide for newish users that covers the basics, written in a style any editor can understand. Your input on the page/talk page is welcomed. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | © | WER 14:17, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
DoRD, could you please take a look at User:Duniyaduniya, from a Checkuser perspective? I am fairly certain this is the same person as User:JohnnyOrgseed, based on the fact that they uploaded the same sets of images and are edit warring them to add to articles (see, for example, the history of Aztec). The reason I'm asking here is because you block JohnyyOrgseed as a checkuser block, but there's no indication of who the master is. Qwyrxian ( talk) 14:11, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi DoRD, you are invited to participate in this discussion. Please note that participation is optional and the discussion closes at 12:15am sharp tonight (GMT+8). Cheers. -- Arctic Kangaroo ( ✉ • ✎) 14:31, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
I'm a bit confused as to how answer the last question by this account. I read the checkuser block section, and it seems to indicate that a user cannot appeal. An administrator has to first question the block and then follow the process outlined in the section. Is that correct, or could the user simply e-mail an appeal to arbcom-appeals-en@lists.wikimedia.org? Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 01:11, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Just some comments about him and the block. Arctic Kangaroo ( ✉ • ✎) 02:58, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey, DoRD! Could you assist me with the request I made of Alison at User talk:Alison#Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DragoLink08? It seems she's too busy to respond. Following a block on a range belonging to USF, one of their network guys contacted me and we've been working to eliminate the disruption on their end. Per their request, I need to be able to pass along the IP used by the most recent sock puppet ( Biggerandbetterthings) so they can take the next step. I'm not familiar with the correct procedure in obtaining this information but believe it is a valid request per Wikipedia:CheckUser#CheckUser and privacy policy #4, bullet point 2. Thanks! -- auburnpilot talk 00:25, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
You recently blocked Pams Ale House ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) with a checkuser block. I just tagged Samesex Marriage78 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) as a suspected sock of PAH, but it appears that PAH is not the sock master. Can you take a look and change my tag as/if appropriate? Toddst1 ( talk) 18:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Is the recently created DoRD2 ( talk · contribs) an alternative account of yours? If not, and they don't put in a username change request within 24 hours, feel free to block them if no one else has. Daniel Case ( talk) 14:50, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
I am astonished to see that I am accused of being a sockpuppet and blocked. I am even outraged because I feel humiliated with this accusation. An accusation of being "user Brunodam" without proof, even if I offered to submit my personal data. I demand justice. I am going to complain to the "Better Business Bureau of Florida" and to the Police department of Fort Lauderdale, following instructions from my attorney about this clear case of harassment & offense. I will ask for damages. Junior5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.46.252.98 ( talk) 18:56, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure if you're still looking at the SPI since you marked it completed, so I'm mentioning this here too. There's a whole bunch of Niharshah* and Niharsms* accounts, some of which aren't blocked. Are those separate, or did they just get missed? -- 71.199.125.210 ( talk) 03:34, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi DoRD I am picking a few random names from editors who have helped me in the past, hoping that one or more might be around for a quick reply. I seem to have read somewhere that it is against policy to solicit others to join an action. At the same time I have often seen notifications of the type "because you have been involved with this article, we would like to let you know that ..." or something along those lines. Specifically, is it ok/ not ok to solicit others to go vote on a deletion vote? Much appreciated, regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia ( talk) 11:28, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
I hear you on stale accounts, but I wondered if a simple solution to this SPI handicap would be to record for posterity on our servers the first and last IPs an account used before becoming inactive. Perhaps there is some privacy related reason why this is not feasible, but it would solve the problem of not being able to tie a stale sockmaster to their newer socks. Any thoughts? GabeMc ( talk| contribs) 20:28, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
{{ you've got mail}} MikeDS ( talk) 11:13, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I get stalked by sockpuppets not infrequently, so I was...intrigued?...to see that you'd imposed a CU block without any report. Is this another twig of the "deity condemns homosexuality" tree, or a totally separate sockmaster? – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 01:06, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Based on his editing both here an on ruwiki, Ctway appears to at least know Russian fairly well. I was surprised too that in Feb he was blocked from an UK IP. I suppose he is moving between the two countries at times or something like that. Another possibility is that he may have recruited someone to repost that article on one of those Russian gun forums he frequents (and which he frequently links in articles here, usually forum.guns.ru) Someone not using his real name ( talk) 17:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
Hey, DoRD, is there a connection between Mangoeater (see Dreamastir ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Anaaaphid ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)) and Untieailed ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) or Anushka127 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)? This has all mushroomed because of my blocks of Untieailed and Anushka127 for edit warring at Aishwarya Rai Filmography. Anushka127 is making quite a fuss on their talk page, and I'm not familiar with Mangoeater other than by name. Thanks.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 16:55, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
You cleverly detected the sockpuppetry last time around. The indf blocked user has since claimed to be active again and boasted not to have been caught, yet. There is a discussion that Humanpublic and Strangesad may now have exchanged passwords, given the similarity of the edits made from the Strangesad accounts to the lines of reasoning used by Humanpublic before and the editing style. A sleeper type check on these accounts may yet reveal something, in all likelihood. Not here anymore ( talk) 19:01, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello DoRD, I'm convinced that I have found "another" Wiki_brah sock. Should I just post in the relevant SPI page, or can I post the evidence I have put together here? Best, Toccata quarta ( talk) 09:27, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Kgarson ( talk · contribs) with just three edits before today, suddenly pops up and reverted two edits of mine, which were themselves reverts. My two reverts were per WP:SPEEDY "The creator of a page may not remove a speedy deletion tag"; the creator was Chicagoghosttown ( talk · contribs). Do you think there is sufficient evidence to file a WP:SPI connecting Kgarson ( talk · contribs) with Chicagoghosttown ( talk · contribs)? -- Redrose64 ( talk) 20:51, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
...you blocked a number of accounts at As'ad AbuKhalil (with an expiry time of indefinite (checkuserblock-account)). They're the red linked accounts in the page history. There is a new account, Bazinga139, doing exactly the same thing as the previous blocked accounts. Would you be able to have a look at it please ? Sean.hoyland - talk 07:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Senencito is appealing his block. I presume this account is the sockmaster for Reeespecto and LuisDOrtega2, but that's not explicitly tagged or documented anywhere. Can you confirm so I can close out the request? Kuru (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
You take that broom-thing quite to heart. Thanks for cleaning house. Drmies ( talk) 14:22, 7 September 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Just a note to let you know that I relisted Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ElPilotoDi and was hoping for a few clarifications. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 06:34, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I tried to move Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unorginal7 to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HoshiNoKaabii2000 per your request. I thought I handled everything correctly, but my watchlist shows an entry in the deletion log saying that you restored the target page at 22:30 UTC. I can't see anything in the HoshiNoKaabii2000 SPI page's history corresponding to this restore operation, though. I did check the HoshiNoKaabii2000 SPI page before doing the move, and it didn't appear to have anything of substance in it. Nevertheless, if I messed something up, I'd like to know what I did and understand how to avoid it happening again. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 23:18, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
Understood! My apologies for working those the wrong way, I'll send them to AIV from now on, I just didn't want to "report complex abuse" to AIV, which I understand is a no-no, and worried issues like those I reported might have been viewed as such. Thanks for your time and attention! (also, I fixed my signature per your request) besieged talk 21:40, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
I checked the URL you left, and stand corrected. What is the NFL looking at that ranks the Titans 2nd over Indy? Rlchambliss ( talk) 01:32, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
I am concerned by your blocks here to these 6 similarly named accounts. Why did you block the accounts immediately and without warning? And why did you prevent account creation if they were being blocked for their usernames? There are any number of good-faith reasons for similarly named accounts, including workshops and school groups. (Indeed, this was a library training workshop run by METRO). Because you blocked them in this way for no discernible reason, the library was no longer able to edit Wikipedia with the accounts or even create new accounts with more unique names. Dominic· t 19:13, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
You have deleted an IP user page[ [4]] that contained information that is currently involved an ANI dispute.[ [5]] The discussion involves harassment by editors of IP editors. I wasn't sure if you were aware of this involvement. Thank you. 174.118.141.197 ( talk) 05:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Re [6], how could you possibly know there's not a Trojan horse (computing) on the editor's computer? NE Ent 00:03, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
For help with photo Antiqueight confer 20:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC) |
Hello DoRD! Question: How do I request it from my talk page? Thanks! ///EuroCar GT 13:21, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
By the way, this might be up your alley: Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)#Student_editing_from_an_open_proxy.3F. I've gotten a couple emails about it recently. Biosthmors ( talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{ U}}) while signing a reply, thx 17:42, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to be counted in the poll. The new poll is located at this link. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them at the election commissioners. --For the Election Commissioners, v/r, TParis
Although our last interaction was not pleasant, I acknowledge your statement today: "Colton Cosmic typically signs his non-mainspace edits[2] - is there any evidence that these edits were made by Colton Cosmic? Please note that this is a shared IP." Here is what I just tried to respond there, in the block where it says "the accused party may comment here," but my response was blocked by a filter.
I would like to have this response, my defense, put at the SPI page, but I won't risk actually asking you because I've no reason to think you'll do it. Colton Cosmic.
Hi,
Thanks for your help on
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Evlekis. I imagine that checkusering is mostly dull and thankless, so... I just want to say that it's appreciated. You rock. Although some of those accounts were quite active so I have a lot of cleanup to do!
bobrayner (
talk) 18:39, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Now that you've blocked the sock accounts, can you see any reason for keeping Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/New life88/User YDP and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/New life88/YDP? Both pages were validly deleted, and I restored them solely for the sake of non-admins participating in the SPI. Nyttend ( talk) 20:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
You have completely altered the intent of my report. It is the IP who is clearly the originator. You have removed any reference to it. Leaky Caldron 13:46, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Would you mind running a quick checkuser on Osarius? This is a WP:SPI#Quick CheckUser requests situation, but I'm making it privately because I'm about to go on the road with family, and I'd like to respond to Osarius before I leave instead of waiting for someone to check the SPI page. Osarius has seemingly been caught in an autoblock, and I'm inclined to grant IPBE at his request; I just want to make sure that everything's clear to grant the right. Please leave me a talkback, and if I don't respond quickly (I don't know when I'm leaving; I'm not the driver), I'd appreciate it if you'd grant the right or deny the unblock request. Nyttend ( talk) 14:50, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I am suspicious that giatharodaki has built a new account named Daki122,I request a checkuser,I am sure the account is a sock puppet. Alhanuty ( talk) 22:01, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
I have just filed a report about his new account Daki122. Alhanuty ( talk) 22:01, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
The report has been out for three days and nobody is responding or using the checkuser to confirm that Daki122 is a sockpuppet. Alhanuty ( talk) 18:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar | |
To DoRD, for diligently and quietly updating the functionary activity statistics, I award this Admin's Barnstar. Thank you for all your work! AGK [•] 11:48, 2 December 2013 (UTC) |
Hi DoRD. Would you mind taking a look at WilliamH's block of the 68.247.0.0/16 range here? I'm currently looking into an unblock request from User:Etonmessisthebest, who's caught in that particular rangeblock. Please could you amend the block to remove autoblock or grant him IP exemption if you deem it wise? Cheers, Yunshui 雲 水 09:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)