Hi DarkMatterMan4500! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! TheImaCow ( talk) 16:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DMacks ( talk) 15:43, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, DarkMatterMan4500. I am “NTM”, the user you blocked on “Awesome Games Wiki” and “Crappy Games Wiki”. I just wanted to apologize for the trouble I caused, I didn’t mean to be a troll. I was just so confused on the thought, “How can a game be good AND bad at the same time?” I understand why I got blocked, and when you decide to unblock me, I promise to never make that mistake ever again. Nate86824650 ( talk) 23:10, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, this is regarding the edits made to the November 2020 section; I was actually merging the references into one cell for the cases between 21 Nov and 30 Nov, similar to how the refs for the cases for 1 -10 Nov and 11-20 Nov are grouped. I apologize if it came off as malicious removal of content. HzgiUU149377 ( talk) 03:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For being a great admin on the Reception Wikis! (my miraheze account is locked because of GDPR) a gd fan ( talk) 18:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC) |
I'm reaching out in response to your comment that my edits on Van Jones' page constitute vandalism. I'm distressed and confused by this accusation--the first section of Jones' page read before I edited it (and reads now) that he "led the fight" to pass a certain initiative. Language like this belongs in rousing campaign speeches and interviews about personal accomplishments. It hardly belongs on an individual's Wikipedia page meant to impartially describe the material facts of their life and record, especially in the case of a visible media figure like Jones.
I changed that language to read that Jones worked with the Trump administration and members of Congress of both parties to pass the First Step Act, a widely accepted truth which has been reported out extensively and acknowledged publicly by Jones himself, in a CNN article I linked.
Your determination that this correction was an "unconstructive edit" constituting "vandalism" is confusing. Could you explain, or restore my edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by U know the deal ( talk • contribs) 01:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the kind response. I'll make the reversion and acknowledge this discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by U know the deal ( talk • contribs) 18:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
Can you tell me the reasons why you believe that my recent edit on the article on Martha S. Pope is considered not constructive? She did served as the 31st Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate per Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate#List of the Sergeants at Arms of the Senate and the 26th Secretary of the United States Senate per Secretary of the United States Senate#Secretaries of the Senate. If you can tell me the errors, I will correct them. Thanks. -- 68.50.32.85 ( talk) 03:05, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm RolandR. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Shpat Kasapi have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. RolandR ( talk) 14:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thanks for the report; the user has been blocked. Regarding the clarification on your user page, may I ask which account you have used before?
If you prefer not to publish this information, please confirm that this is a genuine clean start by a user who has never been blocked from editing.
If this is not the case, please contact the arbitration committee privately with all details, and confirm that you have done so.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 00:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
can you tell me why your reverted my edit of Tom Kirkwood??
I did provide a summary to explain why I made the changes and I added many references to substantiate the information that I entered.
LexaDlawok ( talk) 12:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 12:58, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 20:26, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I feel like an absolute fool to do something stupid like making a complete mistake, so can anyone please tell me what I should do to resolve this issue and to prevent something like this from happening again in the future? Any good advice will do. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 22:37, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
From now on, I'll take a look at edits before reverting them, as what that user has pointed out to me, I had a habit of carelessly reverting edits without even looking. I'll keep an eye out for more editing vandalism from here on out. That IP editor really had a good point of my carelessness, and not to mention he was right, and I was WRONG when I did all of that.
Hi DarkMatterMan4500, what is the reasoning behind your notification of various accounts of open SPI investigations? It seems you've notified five accounts in the past month. CMD ( talk) 16:32, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 16:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, you recently reverted my edit on 1991 NFL season and I was wondering on the grounds under which you considered it not to be constructive? As I said in the edit summary, the purpose of the edit was to remove the unnecessary prefix 'Template:' from a template and to fix a missing end italic. MulberryTwine ( talk) 13:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
You're on Wikipedia, too. Hello Qualitipedia friend! ChessPiece21 ( talk) 16:16, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want me to, I can semi-protect this page for a while, to stop silliness. I don't like protecting user talk pages, as it can cause inconvenience for legitimate editors, but sometimes it is the best option. A number of times I have protected my own talk page because of trolling and vandalism, and when I have done so I have made available a second talk page for editors who are prevented from editing my main talk page. There is nothing to stop the trolls and vandals from editing the second talk page, but I have found over the years that for some reason they almost never do. Maybe the fun in trolling isn't there if they think what they do won't be seen by many people. Anyway, if you would like me to protect the page then please let me know. JBW ( talk) 21:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Saw your comment on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rabt man saying you can see only massive disruption. Can you point out where it happened?. R.C Outlander07@talk 13:38, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
From the diffs provided by the apparent sock, I would like to make my part clear to you.
[2] Reverted unexplained sourced content removal by a sock puppet.
[3] Added citation.
[4] Reverted POV changes by sockpuppet.
[5] Linking with main articles.
[6] Linking with main article.
[7] Reverted sourced content removal.
[8] Reverted sourced content removal by the sock puppet.
[9] Corrected the statement with source.
[10] Restored the page to Sitush version.
[11] Restored content with reference that was removed by anon.
[12] Added content with proper citation.
[13] Talk page with Sitush.
[14] Provided a citation.
[15] Added content with citation and removed later by Sitush.
[16] Added citation also informing Sitush.
[17] I don't know what it mean.
[18] This too.
[19] Reverted content with fake sourcing.(Amazon.com).
Make your comment, what is wrong with these edits? Where did those massive disruptions happen? R.C Outlander07@talk 17:03, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Ouch... Sorry, had an error in my understanding. R.C Outlander07@talk 07:03, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
I saw that you reverted my edit where I removed South African politician Sediane Danny Montsitsi off the COVID-19 death list. I did so because his article was deleted. As part of the rules, one must have an article in order to be included.
Respectfully, ~~Jazzhands90~~
good evening. I saw that you had something to talk to me about on "Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Giubbotto non ortodosso". I do edit on urban and reggae articles like Drake's, Chris Brown's, Omarion's, Buju's. Whats's the deal about my edits?-- Morce Library ( talk) 14:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
I believe you are the same person as User:Dmehus. If that is correct, you evaded your 3 month block - almost immediately after it was imposed - in March 2020. It would also mean you are currently evading scrutiny and evading sanctions, because the Dmehus account is under active sanctions, including avoiding all WP space edits. Normally I would grudgingly consider socking that long ago to be water under the bridge, but I have concerns about your current editing, and they relate to your edits in WP space. By leaving the message you left at User talk:Dmehus recently, you are also currently actively pretending to be two different people. Before I open an SPI, I'd like to give you an opportunity to admit to this if I am right. Please think carefully before answering; I suspect, based on the unwise posting to your old user talk page, that you have edited in a way that will be obvious to a checkuser. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 15:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi DarkMatterMan4500, I hate to do this because the post just above is so recent, but you need to be putting much more care into your countervandalism efforts. Two of your most recent four contributions have been incorrect reverts: restoring genres that shouldn't be there, and restoring an incorrect release year for a song. I didn't spot-check any further because 50% of a random sample is far too high. This is a final warning for all of your countervandalism efforts: not just RCP, but also SPI and anything else related to responding to vandalism or disruption. Please try editing in other areas instead for a while. If you continue making these mistakes, myself or another user will file a request for a topic ban from countervandalism or take some other administrative measure. Thank you. Enterprisey ( talk!) 23:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Kirby-and-the-Forgotten-Land.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:28, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, DarkMatterMan4500!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Dan arndt (
talk) 06:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Afternoon, might want to be careful about the above. If you could post something to point to the reason deny applies here you should be home and dry. But for now I cant see it (but I might not be looking in the right place). Amortias ( T)( C) 14:36, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Not that I'm going to restore the edit, but this is not a personal attack.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Of your last four reverts:
Please consider this a warning for inappropriate use of Twinkle rollback and for factual errors.
Furthermore, you've made two edits
[20]
[21] dancing close to the line of actions that would normally be done by clerks or CUs
(per
TonyBallioni). Maybe not quite across that line, but I would not want to be taking chances in that regard if I were you.
And I don't want to come down too hard here, but I can't help but notice that, of the edits you made yesterday (UTC), you've also asked an admin to correct a trivial typo in a block summary of a user with 8 edits, and c-blanked the word "hello". The first edit serves to waste admin resources, and the second, like your third revert, is not particularly harmful but there's also no reason to make it.
That means that of the 11 edits you made outside your userspace on 1 January (UTC), 9 were either unnecessary or detrimental to the encyclopedia. Please be much more careful. Thank you. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 01:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
ferret (
talk) 15:11, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Hi DarkMatterMan4500,
In reference to the recently removed message by an IP, which you removed with this edit summary: Sorry, but please let an admin tell me that.
It's not admin's role to tell you about guidelines and unconstructive editing. Anyone can, and should, help explain guidelines to editors. That an IP said it rather than an admin makes it no less relevant or true. The IP's message was 100% correct.
Thanks, -- ferret ( talk) 18:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello again DarkMatterMan4500,
I just have a few comments regarding this message you left on my talk page. First of all this is a collaborative project: WP:Communication is required. You can't just decide that you're going to ignore all messages if they're not left by an admin. Secondly, one of our key policies for interaction with other editors is WP:Assume good faith, I assumed good faith about your edits and tried to politely explain policy to you, I ask that you extend the same courtesy to me. I have no idea why you decided to revert my message and speculate that I "might" be an LTA, but you should avoid making such comments unless you can back them up, or they are likely to be taken as a WP:Personal attack, (I am not an LTA by the way, I'm just a very long term IP editor). Finally, all the information I gave you was in the policy I linked, if you wanted to check that the guidance I was giving was correct it was all available to you there.
Thanks, 192.76.8.77 ( talk) 18:42, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Please avoid edits like this. Section headers can be in either format and a bit similar to DATERET and ENGVAR, you should not go around changing section headers that are already consistent. I'd have to dig for it but I think the "non-spaced" version is actually preferred in a guideline somewhere. -- ferret ( talk) 14:22, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
The title Bowser's Fury didn't really make a lot of sense to me, so I did the page move to Super Mario 3D World: + Bowser's Fury to accurately reflect on the actual game title. You may revert the change if you'd like. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 16:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, can you help me understand why you moved this talk page? Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 17:33, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Kirby's Dream Buffet.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi... I just learned that I reported you to AIV in error the other day. I hope it didn't cause you any problems. I meant to report a very similarly-named editor (who is now blocked). Sorry! Wikipelli Talk 20:23, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
[22] [23] Edit summaries are not a place to make forum-y comments, any more than talkpages are. Yes, there's room for a little flexibility in edit summaries (I know I've stuck stray thoughts into ESes every now and then), and if it had just been the first diff I wouldn't be writing to you, but making a cosmetic edit with an edit summary that comments on a living person's appearance is not okay. Please don't do that again. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 19:37, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi DarkMatterMan4500! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! TheImaCow ( talk) 16:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DMacks ( talk) 15:43, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi, DarkMatterMan4500. I am “NTM”, the user you blocked on “Awesome Games Wiki” and “Crappy Games Wiki”. I just wanted to apologize for the trouble I caused, I didn’t mean to be a troll. I was just so confused on the thought, “How can a game be good AND bad at the same time?” I understand why I got blocked, and when you decide to unblock me, I promise to never make that mistake ever again. Nate86824650 ( talk) 23:10, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, this is regarding the edits made to the November 2020 section; I was actually merging the references into one cell for the cases between 21 Nov and 30 Nov, similar to how the refs for the cases for 1 -10 Nov and 11-20 Nov are grouped. I apologize if it came off as malicious removal of content. HzgiUU149377 ( talk) 03:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For being a great admin on the Reception Wikis! (my miraheze account is locked because of GDPR) a gd fan ( talk) 18:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC) |
I'm reaching out in response to your comment that my edits on Van Jones' page constitute vandalism. I'm distressed and confused by this accusation--the first section of Jones' page read before I edited it (and reads now) that he "led the fight" to pass a certain initiative. Language like this belongs in rousing campaign speeches and interviews about personal accomplishments. It hardly belongs on an individual's Wikipedia page meant to impartially describe the material facts of their life and record, especially in the case of a visible media figure like Jones.
I changed that language to read that Jones worked with the Trump administration and members of Congress of both parties to pass the First Step Act, a widely accepted truth which has been reported out extensively and acknowledged publicly by Jones himself, in a CNN article I linked.
Your determination that this correction was an "unconstructive edit" constituting "vandalism" is confusing. Could you explain, or restore my edits? — Preceding unsigned comment added by U know the deal ( talk • contribs) 01:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the kind response. I'll make the reversion and acknowledge this discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by U know the deal ( talk • contribs) 18:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello,
Can you tell me the reasons why you believe that my recent edit on the article on Martha S. Pope is considered not constructive? She did served as the 31st Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate per Sergeant at Arms of the United States Senate#List of the Sergeants at Arms of the Senate and the 26th Secretary of the United States Senate per Secretary of the United States Senate#Secretaries of the Senate. If you can tell me the errors, I will correct them. Thanks. -- 68.50.32.85 ( talk) 03:05, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm RolandR. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Shpat Kasapi have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. RolandR ( talk) 14:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thanks for the report; the user has been blocked. Regarding the clarification on your user page, may I ask which account you have used before?
If you prefer not to publish this information, please confirm that this is a genuine clean start by a user who has never been blocked from editing.
If this is not the case, please contact the arbitration committee privately with all details, and confirm that you have done so.
Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (
talk) 00:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
can you tell me why your reverted my edit of Tom Kirkwood??
I did provide a summary to explain why I made the changes and I added many references to substantiate the information that I entered.
LexaDlawok ( talk) 12:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 12:58, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 20:26, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I feel like an absolute fool to do something stupid like making a complete mistake, so can anyone please tell me what I should do to resolve this issue and to prevent something like this from happening again in the future? Any good advice will do. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 22:37, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
From now on, I'll take a look at edits before reverting them, as what that user has pointed out to me, I had a habit of carelessly reverting edits without even looking. I'll keep an eye out for more editing vandalism from here on out. That IP editor really had a good point of my carelessness, and not to mention he was right, and I was WRONG when I did all of that.
Hi DarkMatterMan4500, what is the reasoning behind your notification of various accounts of open SPI investigations? It seems you've notified five accounts in the past month. CMD ( talk) 16:32, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 16:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi, you recently reverted my edit on 1991 NFL season and I was wondering on the grounds under which you considered it not to be constructive? As I said in the edit summary, the purpose of the edit was to remove the unnecessary prefix 'Template:' from a template and to fix a missing end italic. MulberryTwine ( talk) 13:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
You're on Wikipedia, too. Hello Qualitipedia friend! ChessPiece21 ( talk) 16:16, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want me to, I can semi-protect this page for a while, to stop silliness. I don't like protecting user talk pages, as it can cause inconvenience for legitimate editors, but sometimes it is the best option. A number of times I have protected my own talk page because of trolling and vandalism, and when I have done so I have made available a second talk page for editors who are prevented from editing my main talk page. There is nothing to stop the trolls and vandals from editing the second talk page, but I have found over the years that for some reason they almost never do. Maybe the fun in trolling isn't there if they think what they do won't be seen by many people. Anyway, if you would like me to protect the page then please let me know. JBW ( talk) 21:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Saw your comment on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rabt man saying you can see only massive disruption. Can you point out where it happened?. R.C Outlander07@talk 13:38, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
From the diffs provided by the apparent sock, I would like to make my part clear to you.
[2] Reverted unexplained sourced content removal by a sock puppet.
[3] Added citation.
[4] Reverted POV changes by sockpuppet.
[5] Linking with main articles.
[6] Linking with main article.
[7] Reverted sourced content removal.
[8] Reverted sourced content removal by the sock puppet.
[9] Corrected the statement with source.
[10] Restored the page to Sitush version.
[11] Restored content with reference that was removed by anon.
[12] Added content with proper citation.
[13] Talk page with Sitush.
[14] Provided a citation.
[15] Added content with citation and removed later by Sitush.
[16] Added citation also informing Sitush.
[17] I don't know what it mean.
[18] This too.
[19] Reverted content with fake sourcing.(Amazon.com).
Make your comment, what is wrong with these edits? Where did those massive disruptions happen? R.C Outlander07@talk 17:03, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Ouch... Sorry, had an error in my understanding. R.C Outlander07@talk 07:03, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
I saw that you reverted my edit where I removed South African politician Sediane Danny Montsitsi off the COVID-19 death list. I did so because his article was deleted. As part of the rules, one must have an article in order to be included.
Respectfully, ~~Jazzhands90~~
good evening. I saw that you had something to talk to me about on "Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Giubbotto non ortodosso". I do edit on urban and reggae articles like Drake's, Chris Brown's, Omarion's, Buju's. Whats's the deal about my edits?-- Morce Library ( talk) 14:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
I believe you are the same person as User:Dmehus. If that is correct, you evaded your 3 month block - almost immediately after it was imposed - in March 2020. It would also mean you are currently evading scrutiny and evading sanctions, because the Dmehus account is under active sanctions, including avoiding all WP space edits. Normally I would grudgingly consider socking that long ago to be water under the bridge, but I have concerns about your current editing, and they relate to your edits in WP space. By leaving the message you left at User talk:Dmehus recently, you are also currently actively pretending to be two different people. Before I open an SPI, I'd like to give you an opportunity to admit to this if I am right. Please think carefully before answering; I suspect, based on the unwise posting to your old user talk page, that you have edited in a way that will be obvious to a checkuser. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 15:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi DarkMatterMan4500, I hate to do this because the post just above is so recent, but you need to be putting much more care into your countervandalism efforts. Two of your most recent four contributions have been incorrect reverts: restoring genres that shouldn't be there, and restoring an incorrect release year for a song. I didn't spot-check any further because 50% of a random sample is far too high. This is a final warning for all of your countervandalism efforts: not just RCP, but also SPI and anything else related to responding to vandalism or disruption. Please try editing in other areas instead for a while. If you continue making these mistakes, myself or another user will file a request for a topic ban from countervandalism or take some other administrative measure. Thank you. Enterprisey ( talk!) 23:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Kirby-and-the-Forgotten-Land.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:28, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, DarkMatterMan4500!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Dan arndt (
talk) 06:39, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
|
Afternoon, might want to be careful about the above. If you could post something to point to the reason deny applies here you should be home and dry. But for now I cant see it (but I might not be looking in the right place). Amortias ( T)( C) 14:36, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Not that I'm going to restore the edit, but this is not a personal attack.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Of your last four reverts:
Please consider this a warning for inappropriate use of Twinkle rollback and for factual errors.
Furthermore, you've made two edits
[20]
[21] dancing close to the line of actions that would normally be done by clerks or CUs
(per
TonyBallioni). Maybe not quite across that line, but I would not want to be taking chances in that regard if I were you.
And I don't want to come down too hard here, but I can't help but notice that, of the edits you made yesterday (UTC), you've also asked an admin to correct a trivial typo in a block summary of a user with 8 edits, and c-blanked the word "hello". The first edit serves to waste admin resources, and the second, like your third revert, is not particularly harmful but there's also no reason to make it.
That means that of the 11 edits you made outside your userspace on 1 January (UTC), 9 were either unnecessary or detrimental to the encyclopedia. Please be much more careful. Thank you. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she/they) 01:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
ferret (
talk) 15:11, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Hi DarkMatterMan4500,
In reference to the recently removed message by an IP, which you removed with this edit summary: Sorry, but please let an admin tell me that.
It's not admin's role to tell you about guidelines and unconstructive editing. Anyone can, and should, help explain guidelines to editors. That an IP said it rather than an admin makes it no less relevant or true. The IP's message was 100% correct.
Thanks, -- ferret ( talk) 18:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello again DarkMatterMan4500,
I just have a few comments regarding this message you left on my talk page. First of all this is a collaborative project: WP:Communication is required. You can't just decide that you're going to ignore all messages if they're not left by an admin. Secondly, one of our key policies for interaction with other editors is WP:Assume good faith, I assumed good faith about your edits and tried to politely explain policy to you, I ask that you extend the same courtesy to me. I have no idea why you decided to revert my message and speculate that I "might" be an LTA, but you should avoid making such comments unless you can back them up, or they are likely to be taken as a WP:Personal attack, (I am not an LTA by the way, I'm just a very long term IP editor). Finally, all the information I gave you was in the policy I linked, if you wanted to check that the guidance I was giving was correct it was all available to you there.
Thanks, 192.76.8.77 ( talk) 18:42, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Please avoid edits like this. Section headers can be in either format and a bit similar to DATERET and ENGVAR, you should not go around changing section headers that are already consistent. I'd have to dig for it but I think the "non-spaced" version is actually preferred in a guideline somewhere. -- ferret ( talk) 14:22, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
The title Bowser's Fury didn't really make a lot of sense to me, so I did the page move to Super Mario 3D World: + Bowser's Fury to accurately reflect on the actual game title. You may revert the change if you'd like. DarkMatterMan4500 ( talk) ( contribs) 16:42, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, can you help me understand why you moved this talk page? Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 17:33, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Kirby's Dream Buffet.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi... I just learned that I reported you to AIV in error the other day. I hope it didn't cause you any problems. I meant to report a very similarly-named editor (who is now blocked). Sorry! Wikipelli Talk 20:23, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
[22] [23] Edit summaries are not a place to make forum-y comments, any more than talkpages are. Yes, there's room for a little flexibility in edit summaries (I know I've stuck stray thoughts into ESes every now and then), and if it had just been the first diff I wouldn't be writing to you, but making a cosmetic edit with an edit summary that comments on a living person's appearance is not okay. Please don't do that again. -- Tamzin cetacean needed (she|they|xe) 19:37, 10 September 2022 (UTC)