|
Hi Bohemian Baltimore! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Benzband ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:17, 6 August 2014 (UTC) |
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 06:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ethnic groups in Baltimore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglophone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:53, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I have undone your edits to Frank Zappa because the wikilinks pointed to articles not related to the subject. See also wp:EASTEREGG. Cheers - DVdm ( talk) 15:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello Bohemian Baltimore,
I am conducting research about newcomers to Wikipedia and I was hoping to ask you some questions. I’ve noticed you’ve had some good activity recently. Is there any chance you have time in the next month to speak with me? If you are interested or have any questions, please email me at gmugar [at] syr.edu or leave a message on my talk page.
I hope to be in touch soon,
Gabrielm199 ( talk) 22:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Category:Islam in the Gambia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 17:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello, when creating the category you mistakenly included a commonscat link even though no such page existed on wikicommons. DGtal ( talk) 12:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Fyi, I nominated Category:Leninist parties for CfD. -- Soman ( talk) 18:17, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
On Yael Naim
- you did not remove the category Israeli people of French descent
- you did also not remove the category Israeli people of Tunisian-Jewish descent
- but you did remove the category Israeli people of Tunisian descent .
Apparently you applied similar, silly changes on a legion of WP articles. Whatever rules you make up in your personal value system, you are not authorised to employ your personal value system on WP articles. This is vandalism. Stop doing that immediately! -- johayek ( talk) 01:58, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Please do not insult me or make accusations, calling me an obsessed and racist vandal. I'd appreciate it if you assumed good faith. Why should Yael Naim be classified under both the "Israeli people of Tunisian descent" and "Israeli people of Tunisian-Jewish descent" categories, when the Tunisian-Jewish descent category is sufficent? I didn't remove the French descent category because I didn't notice it. Have a nice night. Bohemian Baltimore ( talk) 02:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Why don't you simply leave all the categories untouched? Somebody seemed to find them useful? Even if there was some redundancy, why do you bother? The only possible explanation for your doing is some sort of racism. Maybe you want to explain your reasons and seek agreement before you start acting like during the last hours. -- johayek ( talk) 02:48, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Do you have a good reference for that - or what or how are you determining identifications with the specific groups.
Just to be 'labelled' in Indonesia does not actually mean that the identification comes from the people, it can be a left over from the new order era when you 'had to have religion' or you would be breaking the law.
In the current political climate in south east asia - to identify groups as ethnoreligious is potentially a revertable exercise which you need top be prepared for.
User:JarrahTree 05:30, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Dear User,
As you are one of the contributors to Tunisian Arabic. You are kindly asked to review the part about Domains of Use and adjust it directly or through comments in the talk page of Tunisian Arabic.
Yours Sincerely,
-- Csisc ( talk) 14:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Bohemian Baltimore, please be very careful with the mass assigning or removing of "of descent" categories. They are very contentious and it is very easy to make a lot of category changes over a short period of time. It would help if you discussed your planned changes on the talk page of WP:CFD or on the appropriate WikiProject talk page because it will be difficult to undo the work you are doing if it is not in keeping with the current category tree on descent. Liz Read! Talk! 00:59, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Is there a more specific subcat of Category:American Jews of African descent for Ammiel Alcalay, because that cat is currently tagged as a container (subcats only). Slivicon ( talk) 15:33, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi! I've granted you the autopatrol flag, since I see no reason why you shouldn't have it (there is little point in making other review edits of an editor who is obviously editing in good faith). If for any reason you don't want it, please let me know and I can remove it. Cheers,— Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • ( yo?); November 10, 2015; 20:45 (UTC)
- Thank you, User:Ezhiki, I appreciate it. Bohemian Baltimore ( talk) 00:09, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Category:Lebanese people of Maronite Christian descent, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Elias Z 07:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Savvyjack23 (
talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Savvyjack23 ( talk) 07:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi I suppose you realise we already had a category for massacres of indigenous australians in the australian project? your added one is a bit like a few others in wp en where parallel cats do cause some concern for some at CFD. I am not complaining, just observing and let you know.. cheers
JarrahTree 01:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Double checked, and I can see there is insufficient identification of the indigenous element in Massacres in Australia. my problem, cheers.
JarrahTree 01:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
however, very unimpressed by the conservatism trap set of categories, that is not friendly to fellow editors, but a bit like a minefield of catch 22 bomb disposal loops. Indonesia is not in oceania in most of the encyclopedia (some odd places it has crept in but in most cases has been cleaned up), and the reducing category pages to un-negotiable instructions that do not allow the average editor to negotiate is not kosher to say the least. For the conservative portal link to trump any tinkering is simply not good faith editing.the same thing was applied to the festival category tree categories, it is clearly something that is bigger than any one subject area, forget it. no need to reply or think about JarrahTree 05:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, could you explain this edit you made? I don't get the little "T". - Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Category:Populist parties in the United States has been nominated for discussion
Category:Populist parties in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS ( talk) 04:45, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Category:Ethnoreligious groups by region has been nominated for discussion
Category:Ethnoreligious groups by region, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS ( talk) 16:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Category:Persecution of pagans has been nominated for discussion
Category:Persecution of pagans, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 23:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
The Appalachian population in Collinwood may have diminished, but the article states that they were a historically significant presence along with Slovenes and Italians but that the neighborhood is now majority African-American. Wouldn't it be fair to include culture/history categories for African-Americans, Italian-Americans, and Slovene-Americans, as well as Appalachian migrants? Bohemian Baltimore ( talk) 08:01, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Appalachian Culture in Collinowood was never really a thing like the Italians, Slovenes and Black population that is and was there. Unlike the ethnic groups you mention that are featured in the categories, the minority white presence of people from the South and Appalachian regions were assimilated into an urban environment and within a generation, those who remained weren't Appalachian anymore -- they were urban and from Cleveland. The Black, Italian and Slovene populations in Collinwood remained entrenched in their cultural heritage and still do as African-Americans Italian-Americans and Slovene-Americans. They built social clubs and churches and defined the neighborhood culturally. People moving to the city from the South during the war for employment (which happened all over states with heavy manufacturing during the War, and is exactly why own father's family moved up to Warren and Youngstown from West Virginia) is one thing, but to say they left an Appalachian cultural mark on the neighborhood would be a huge reach. Aside from the bars that they frequented (which are long gone and/or have changed patron demographics), there wasn't a cultural shift in the neighborhood. A lot of them migrated elsewhere (e.g. the suburbs) after the war when the city began to go into decline but the ones who reamined didn't give the neighborhood anything resembling an Appalachian cultural identity. And I not only grew up close to Collinwood and spent enough time around it to know what and who the culture is like there, I also lived in Appalachia while I was in the army. Towns like Moundsville, Steubenville, Martin's Ferry, Boone, Gate City and Big Stone Gap are all areas rich in Appalachian culture. A couple blocks in a neighborhood in a factory town that housed some people who moved to Cleveland from other parts of the country 50-60 years ago doesn't warrant inclusion in the category you're making the case for. Ryecatcher773 ( talk) 08:56, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Greenland into
Danish people in Greenland. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —
Diannaa (
talk) 13:36, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- I appreciate your explanation, Diannaa, I was unaware of this Wikipedia policy. Thanks for taking the time to explain it. I don't believe I have copied material between articles before and I will be sure to provide proper attribution if I decide to copy material in future. Have a nice day/night. Bohemian Baltimore ( talk) 10:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi you edited several time on above entry. I just proposed it for deletion. Pls see talk page. -- Kipala ( talk) 23:14, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Bohemian Baltimore, I have noticed your inclusions within this category and I must ask in what way would the many radio stations pertaining to Haiti constitute as being strictly "Afro-Caribbean," especially when each article does not specifically states that it is? I've also noticed that "Category:Papiamento" is also included in the "Afro-Caribbean culture" category, which although has African elements, is not strictly of African origin, when the language itself may be 90-95% of Portuguese origin and is not exclusively spoken by a sole demographic regardless of how high that ratio would be. The proper categorization would be "Caribbean culture in the United States" and "Caribbean culture" respectively unless stated otherwise in said articles. As it stands, this is a strong case of WP:POV and identifying (all?) Caribbean culture with Africanism which is also again one's point of view.
Within the Category:Afro-Caribbean culture in the United States, you have also included "Louisiana Voodoo." While, slaves were taken from Saint-Domingue (Haiti) to New Orleans, there is no evidence to actually (currently) support and imply that it wasn't already practiced before this time, for the same reasons why we cannot call Louisiana Creole French, an Afro-Caribbean dialect. So essentially, we are calling every newspaper in Haiti, a black newspaper (or African), and Creole languages the same. This is the same stereotype dealt with in the New Orleans area and in many countries around the world, labeling creole languages as such when people of all races would be able to converse in the languages as well. To add, the exact origins of these languages are unclear and are merely theories. You have been a grade A contributor and administrator, who I have thanked on many occasions since the time I have started editing, and I am fully confident that you will realize what I am trying to convey here and to make good on it. Thank you kindly. Savvyjack23 ( talk) 20:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, Savvyjack23! Thanks for taking the time to comment. I very much appreciate your input. I had placed 'Papiamento' under both 'Afro-Caribbean' and 'Portuguese-Caribbean' categories because I saw that Papiamento had both Portuguese and West African influences. I placed Haitian Creole language related articles under 'Afro-Caribbean' categories as well, given the West African influence on Haitian Creole. Likewise with Louisiana Voodoo, I only meant to acknowledge Afro-Caribbean influence on the religion, not imply that the religion was solely Afro-Caribbean. If these categories are inappropriate, I'm perfectly fine with them being removed. I'm well aware that Papiamento and Haitian Creole are not solely spoken by black people in the Caribbean and I most definitely do not conflate all Caribbean culture with African diaspora culture (if I did, I wouldn't have created a sub-category for 'Afro-Caribbean' culture). It has always been my intent to reflect the cultural diversity of the Caribbean (Afro-Caribbean, Indo-Caribbean, white Caribbean, etc.) and I've edited a number of articles pertaining to both black and non-black populations in the Caribbean, so I'm disappointed in myself if my recent edits have been insufficient in that respect. Oy! My intent was to emphasis black culture in the Caribbean, not conflate the two, so my apologies for doing so improperly. My interest in Appalachian culture has run into the same issue before; whereas Caribbean people are often stereotyped as being of African descent, being Appalachian is often stereotyped as being a rural white Christian. It's been my goal to emphasize urban, African, and Jewish populations in the region to emphasize the region's cultural diversity, so I very much sympathize with your concerns here about not wanting to stereotype the Caribbean as being solely African. Thank you again for your very helpful constructive criticism, I will try to be more careful with these categories in future. Have a nice night/day. Bohemian Baltimore ( talk) 05:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
- Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Category:Critics of political correctness has been nominated for discussion
Category:Critics of political correctness, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Niteshift36 ( talk) 18:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Category:Religion in North Africa has been nominated for discussion
Category:Religion in North Africa, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 11:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Livonia, Michigan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Just so you know, I'm removing the category Xenophobia in Africa (and in one case, Category: anti-white racism in Africa)from some of the articles you've tagged them in. These articles are about words referring to foreigners (not always white foreigners), which aren't derogatory or neccessarily xenophobic. Thanks for understanding. Mooeena ( talk) 19:34, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Bohemian Baltimore. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Category:Krampus has been nominated for discussion
Category:Krampus, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Dingley ( talk) 15:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Category:Opposition to Christianity in the Middle East has been nominated for discussion
Category:Opposition to Christianity in the Middle East, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 14:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Russian upper class
A tag has been placed on Category:Russian upper class requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — swpb T 15:25, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to
Hatchet (film), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's
categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's
verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you.
DonIago (
talk) 05:25, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Category:Hixploitation films has been nominated for discussion
Category:Hixploitation films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago ( talk) 05:32, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Category:Political correctness-related controversies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Koncorde ( talk) 10:41, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Category:Opponents of affirmative action has been nominated for discussion
Category:Opponents of affirmative action, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs) 03:20, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Category:White African has been nominated for discussion
Category:White African, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 15:09, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Category:White Canadian culture has been nominated for discussion
Category:White Canadian culture, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 19:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Category:White Namibian culture has been nominated for discussion
Category:White Namibian culture, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 19:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Category:Afrikaner culture in South Africa has been nominated for discussion
Category:Afrikaner culture in South Africa, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:06, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Category:Afrikaner culture in Africa by city has been nominated for discussion
Category:Afrikaner culture in Africa by city, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:09, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Category:Shinto in Asia has been nominated for discussion
Category:Shinto in Asia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 06:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Category:Coptic atheists has been nominated for discussion
Category:Coptic atheists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 19:23, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Hi,
I'm one of the moderators of a Coptic Atheist group on Reddit. Wikipedia says you created the Coptic Atheist article here. On behalf of all the mods there and the contributors who helped me sort out and fill this Article, I just wanted to express my gratitude. Thanks, I really appreciate it, especially since we need whatever publicity we get. |
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, Bohemian Baltimore. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
I am only learning the people and events of Maryland's Black history as I go along. I started working on Lewis Charlton (slave) page and moving on from there, but being neither Black nor from Maryland; I could use all the help I could get. Thanks C. W. Gilmore ( talk) 19:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Category:Jewish-related controversies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bangalamania ( talk) 13:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you placed a POV tag on the page for Beth Elliot I'm wondering why, and if you could please explain that on the talk page for the article proper, because right now it's hard to figure out what you think is wrong with the article.
Thanks. Cam94509 ( talk) 22:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Sure, give me some time and I'll add a note to the talk page. I added the POV tag because the article is very clearly written by someone with a favorable view of and sympathy for Beth Elliott. It's not a neutral tone to take when writing about a controversial figure who has been accused of engaging in allegedly predatory sexual behavior. The sentence with "Not only was Elliott emotionally and socially scarred, but the words defaming her circulated among grassroots lesbian networks" strikes me as particularly biased. This sentence could be interpreted as implying that people like Bev Jo Von Dohre slandered or libeled Beth Elliot, and Wikipedia should not be making such claims. Bohemian Baltimore ( talk) 06:30, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Bohemian Baltimore. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:Christianity in Pakistan by city has been nominated for discussion
Category:Christianity in Pakistan by city, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:46, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Category:Native American Jews has been nominated for discussion
Category:Native American Jews, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:58, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Category:Shinto in Japan by city has been nominated for discussion
Category:Shinto in Japan by city, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:21, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Category:Buddhism in Seoul has been nominated for discussion
Category:Buddhism in Seoul, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:29, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Category:Christianity in Bangkok has been nominated for discussion
Category:Christianity in Bangkok, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 10:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Category:Religion in Afghanistan by city has been nominated for discussion
Category:Religion in Afghanistan by city, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:47, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Category:Religion in Hagerstown, Maryland has been nominated for discussion
Category:Religion in Hagerstown, Maryland, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 08:15, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Category:Christianity in Copenhagen has been nominated for discussion
Category:Christianity in Copenhagen, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 08:31, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Category:Latgalians has been nominated for discussion
Category:Latgalians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:49, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Just want to say "Thank You" for divorcing AfterEllen from AfterElton. If you were not responding to my proposal to do so, then you read my mind. :-) Pyxis Solitary yak 12:21, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Articles should not be moved that way. Always used the "Move" option at the top of an article or got to WP:Requested moves if you need admin help to move an article. I've taken the AfterEllen.com matter to WP:Requested moves for a WP:Histmerge. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 01:31, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bohemian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lusatians ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:11, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Category:Religion in Iraq by city has been nominated for discussion
Category:Religion in Iraq by city, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:51, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Category:Religion in the Arab world by city has been nominated for discussion
Category:Religion in the Arab world by city, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:54, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
No clue what I’m doing. Just poking around trying to figure it all out. JLicher69 ( talk) 03:36, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Hi Bohemian Baltimore! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Benzband ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:17, 6 August 2014 (UTC) |
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 06:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ethnic groups in Baltimore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglophone. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:53, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I have undone your edits to Frank Zappa because the wikilinks pointed to articles not related to the subject. See also wp:EASTEREGG. Cheers - DVdm ( talk) 15:09, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello Bohemian Baltimore,
I am conducting research about newcomers to Wikipedia and I was hoping to ask you some questions. I’ve noticed you’ve had some good activity recently. Is there any chance you have time in the next month to speak with me? If you are interested or have any questions, please email me at gmugar [at] syr.edu or leave a message on my talk page.
I hope to be in touch soon,
Gabrielm199 ( talk) 22:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Category:Islam in the Gambia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 17:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello, when creating the category you mistakenly included a commonscat link even though no such page existed on wikicommons. DGtal ( talk) 12:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Fyi, I nominated Category:Leninist parties for CfD. -- Soman ( talk) 18:17, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
On Yael Naim
- you did not remove the category Israeli people of French descent
- you did also not remove the category Israeli people of Tunisian-Jewish descent
- but you did remove the category Israeli people of Tunisian descent .
Apparently you applied similar, silly changes on a legion of WP articles. Whatever rules you make up in your personal value system, you are not authorised to employ your personal value system on WP articles. This is vandalism. Stop doing that immediately! -- johayek ( talk) 01:58, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Please do not insult me or make accusations, calling me an obsessed and racist vandal. I'd appreciate it if you assumed good faith. Why should Yael Naim be classified under both the "Israeli people of Tunisian descent" and "Israeli people of Tunisian-Jewish descent" categories, when the Tunisian-Jewish descent category is sufficent? I didn't remove the French descent category because I didn't notice it. Have a nice night. Bohemian Baltimore ( talk) 02:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Why don't you simply leave all the categories untouched? Somebody seemed to find them useful? Even if there was some redundancy, why do you bother? The only possible explanation for your doing is some sort of racism. Maybe you want to explain your reasons and seek agreement before you start acting like during the last hours. -- johayek ( talk) 02:48, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Do you have a good reference for that - or what or how are you determining identifications with the specific groups.
Just to be 'labelled' in Indonesia does not actually mean that the identification comes from the people, it can be a left over from the new order era when you 'had to have religion' or you would be breaking the law.
In the current political climate in south east asia - to identify groups as ethnoreligious is potentially a revertable exercise which you need top be prepared for.
User:JarrahTree 05:30, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Dear User,
As you are one of the contributors to Tunisian Arabic. You are kindly asked to review the part about Domains of Use and adjust it directly or through comments in the talk page of Tunisian Arabic.
Yours Sincerely,
-- Csisc ( talk) 14:26, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Bohemian Baltimore, please be very careful with the mass assigning or removing of "of descent" categories. They are very contentious and it is very easy to make a lot of category changes over a short period of time. It would help if you discussed your planned changes on the talk page of WP:CFD or on the appropriate WikiProject talk page because it will be difficult to undo the work you are doing if it is not in keeping with the current category tree on descent. Liz Read! Talk! 00:59, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Is there a more specific subcat of Category:American Jews of African descent for Ammiel Alcalay, because that cat is currently tagged as a container (subcats only). Slivicon ( talk) 15:33, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi! I've granted you the autopatrol flag, since I see no reason why you shouldn't have it (there is little point in making other review edits of an editor who is obviously editing in good faith). If for any reason you don't want it, please let me know and I can remove it. Cheers,— Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • ( yo?); November 10, 2015; 20:45 (UTC)
- Thank you, User:Ezhiki, I appreciate it. Bohemian Baltimore ( talk) 00:09, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Category:Lebanese people of Maronite Christian descent, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Elias Z 07:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
Savvyjack23 (
talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:New Year 1}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Savvyjack23 ( talk) 07:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi I suppose you realise we already had a category for massacres of indigenous australians in the australian project? your added one is a bit like a few others in wp en where parallel cats do cause some concern for some at CFD. I am not complaining, just observing and let you know.. cheers
JarrahTree 01:09, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Double checked, and I can see there is insufficient identification of the indigenous element in Massacres in Australia. my problem, cheers.
JarrahTree 01:17, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
however, very unimpressed by the conservatism trap set of categories, that is not friendly to fellow editors, but a bit like a minefield of catch 22 bomb disposal loops. Indonesia is not in oceania in most of the encyclopedia (some odd places it has crept in but in most cases has been cleaned up), and the reducing category pages to un-negotiable instructions that do not allow the average editor to negotiate is not kosher to say the least. For the conservative portal link to trump any tinkering is simply not good faith editing.the same thing was applied to the festival category tree categories, it is clearly something that is bigger than any one subject area, forget it. no need to reply or think about JarrahTree 05:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi, could you explain this edit you made? I don't get the little "T". - Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
Category:Populist parties in the United States has been nominated for discussion
Category:Populist parties in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS ( talk) 04:45, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Category:Ethnoreligious groups by region has been nominated for discussion
Category:Ethnoreligious groups by region, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS ( talk) 16:44, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Category:Persecution of pagans has been nominated for discussion
Category:Persecution of pagans, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 23:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
The Appalachian population in Collinwood may have diminished, but the article states that they were a historically significant presence along with Slovenes and Italians but that the neighborhood is now majority African-American. Wouldn't it be fair to include culture/history categories for African-Americans, Italian-Americans, and Slovene-Americans, as well as Appalachian migrants? Bohemian Baltimore ( talk) 08:01, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Appalachian Culture in Collinowood was never really a thing like the Italians, Slovenes and Black population that is and was there. Unlike the ethnic groups you mention that are featured in the categories, the minority white presence of people from the South and Appalachian regions were assimilated into an urban environment and within a generation, those who remained weren't Appalachian anymore -- they were urban and from Cleveland. The Black, Italian and Slovene populations in Collinwood remained entrenched in their cultural heritage and still do as African-Americans Italian-Americans and Slovene-Americans. They built social clubs and churches and defined the neighborhood culturally. People moving to the city from the South during the war for employment (which happened all over states with heavy manufacturing during the War, and is exactly why own father's family moved up to Warren and Youngstown from West Virginia) is one thing, but to say they left an Appalachian cultural mark on the neighborhood would be a huge reach. Aside from the bars that they frequented (which are long gone and/or have changed patron demographics), there wasn't a cultural shift in the neighborhood. A lot of them migrated elsewhere (e.g. the suburbs) after the war when the city began to go into decline but the ones who reamined didn't give the neighborhood anything resembling an Appalachian cultural identity. And I not only grew up close to Collinwood and spent enough time around it to know what and who the culture is like there, I also lived in Appalachia while I was in the army. Towns like Moundsville, Steubenville, Martin's Ferry, Boone, Gate City and Big Stone Gap are all areas rich in Appalachian culture. A couple blocks in a neighborhood in a factory town that housed some people who moved to Cleveland from other parts of the country 50-60 years ago doesn't warrant inclusion in the category you're making the case for. Ryecatcher773 ( talk) 08:56, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Greenland into
Danish people in Greenland. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —
Diannaa (
talk) 13:36, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- I appreciate your explanation, Diannaa, I was unaware of this Wikipedia policy. Thanks for taking the time to explain it. I don't believe I have copied material between articles before and I will be sure to provide proper attribution if I decide to copy material in future. Have a nice day/night. Bohemian Baltimore ( talk) 10:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi you edited several time on above entry. I just proposed it for deletion. Pls see talk page. -- Kipala ( talk) 23:14, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Bohemian Baltimore, I have noticed your inclusions within this category and I must ask in what way would the many radio stations pertaining to Haiti constitute as being strictly "Afro-Caribbean," especially when each article does not specifically states that it is? I've also noticed that "Category:Papiamento" is also included in the "Afro-Caribbean culture" category, which although has African elements, is not strictly of African origin, when the language itself may be 90-95% of Portuguese origin and is not exclusively spoken by a sole demographic regardless of how high that ratio would be. The proper categorization would be "Caribbean culture in the United States" and "Caribbean culture" respectively unless stated otherwise in said articles. As it stands, this is a strong case of WP:POV and identifying (all?) Caribbean culture with Africanism which is also again one's point of view.
Within the Category:Afro-Caribbean culture in the United States, you have also included "Louisiana Voodoo." While, slaves were taken from Saint-Domingue (Haiti) to New Orleans, there is no evidence to actually (currently) support and imply that it wasn't already practiced before this time, for the same reasons why we cannot call Louisiana Creole French, an Afro-Caribbean dialect. So essentially, we are calling every newspaper in Haiti, a black newspaper (or African), and Creole languages the same. This is the same stereotype dealt with in the New Orleans area and in many countries around the world, labeling creole languages as such when people of all races would be able to converse in the languages as well. To add, the exact origins of these languages are unclear and are merely theories. You have been a grade A contributor and administrator, who I have thanked on many occasions since the time I have started editing, and I am fully confident that you will realize what I am trying to convey here and to make good on it. Thank you kindly. Savvyjack23 ( talk) 20:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, Savvyjack23! Thanks for taking the time to comment. I very much appreciate your input. I had placed 'Papiamento' under both 'Afro-Caribbean' and 'Portuguese-Caribbean' categories because I saw that Papiamento had both Portuguese and West African influences. I placed Haitian Creole language related articles under 'Afro-Caribbean' categories as well, given the West African influence on Haitian Creole. Likewise with Louisiana Voodoo, I only meant to acknowledge Afro-Caribbean influence on the religion, not imply that the religion was solely Afro-Caribbean. If these categories are inappropriate, I'm perfectly fine with them being removed. I'm well aware that Papiamento and Haitian Creole are not solely spoken by black people in the Caribbean and I most definitely do not conflate all Caribbean culture with African diaspora culture (if I did, I wouldn't have created a sub-category for 'Afro-Caribbean' culture). It has always been my intent to reflect the cultural diversity of the Caribbean (Afro-Caribbean, Indo-Caribbean, white Caribbean, etc.) and I've edited a number of articles pertaining to both black and non-black populations in the Caribbean, so I'm disappointed in myself if my recent edits have been insufficient in that respect. Oy! My intent was to emphasis black culture in the Caribbean, not conflate the two, so my apologies for doing so improperly. My interest in Appalachian culture has run into the same issue before; whereas Caribbean people are often stereotyped as being of African descent, being Appalachian is often stereotyped as being a rural white Christian. It's been my goal to emphasize urban, African, and Jewish populations in the region to emphasize the region's cultural diversity, so I very much sympathize with your concerns here about not wanting to stereotype the Caribbean as being solely African. Thank you again for your very helpful constructive criticism, I will try to be more careful with these categories in future. Have a nice night/day. Bohemian Baltimore ( talk) 05:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
- Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)
Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Category:Critics of political correctness has been nominated for discussion
Category:Critics of political correctness, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Niteshift36 ( talk) 18:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Category:Religion in North Africa has been nominated for discussion
Category:Religion in North Africa, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 11:55, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Livonia, Michigan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:12, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Just so you know, I'm removing the category Xenophobia in Africa (and in one case, Category: anti-white racism in Africa)from some of the articles you've tagged them in. These articles are about words referring to foreigners (not always white foreigners), which aren't derogatory or neccessarily xenophobic. Thanks for understanding. Mooeena ( talk) 19:34, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
|
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Bohemian Baltimore. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Category:Krampus has been nominated for discussion
Category:Krampus, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Dingley ( talk) 15:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Category:Opposition to Christianity in the Middle East has been nominated for discussion
Category:Opposition to Christianity in the Middle East, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 14:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Russian upper class
A tag has been placed on Category:Russian upper class requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — swpb T 15:25, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to
Hatchet (film), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's
categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's
verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you.
DonIago (
talk) 05:25, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Category:Hixploitation films has been nominated for discussion
Category:Hixploitation films, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago ( talk) 05:32, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Category:Political correctness-related controversies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Koncorde ( talk) 10:41, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
Category:Opponents of affirmative action has been nominated for discussion
Category:Opponents of affirmative action, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs) 03:20, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Category:White African has been nominated for discussion
Category:White African, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 15:09, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Category:White Canadian culture has been nominated for discussion
Category:White Canadian culture, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 19:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Category:White Namibian culture has been nominated for discussion
Category:White Namibian culture, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 19:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Category:Afrikaner culture in South Africa has been nominated for discussion
Category:Afrikaner culture in South Africa, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:06, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Category:Afrikaner culture in Africa by city has been nominated for discussion
Category:Afrikaner culture in Africa by city, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:09, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Category:Shinto in Asia has been nominated for discussion
Category:Shinto in Asia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 06:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
Category:Coptic atheists has been nominated for discussion
Category:Coptic atheists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 19:23, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Hi,
I'm one of the moderators of a Coptic Atheist group on Reddit. Wikipedia says you created the Coptic Atheist article here. On behalf of all the mods there and the contributors who helped me sort out and fill this Article, I just wanted to express my gratitude. Thanks, I really appreciate it, especially since we need whatever publicity we get. |
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, Bohemian Baltimore. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
I am only learning the people and events of Maryland's Black history as I go along. I started working on Lewis Charlton (slave) page and moving on from there, but being neither Black nor from Maryland; I could use all the help I could get. Thanks C. W. Gilmore ( talk) 19:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Category:Jewish-related controversies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bangalamania ( talk) 13:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed you placed a POV tag on the page for Beth Elliot I'm wondering why, and if you could please explain that on the talk page for the article proper, because right now it's hard to figure out what you think is wrong with the article.
Thanks. Cam94509 ( talk) 22:09, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
- Sure, give me some time and I'll add a note to the talk page. I added the POV tag because the article is very clearly written by someone with a favorable view of and sympathy for Beth Elliott. It's not a neutral tone to take when writing about a controversial figure who has been accused of engaging in allegedly predatory sexual behavior. The sentence with "Not only was Elliott emotionally and socially scarred, but the words defaming her circulated among grassroots lesbian networks" strikes me as particularly biased. This sentence could be interpreted as implying that people like Bev Jo Von Dohre slandered or libeled Beth Elliot, and Wikipedia should not be making such claims. Bohemian Baltimore ( talk) 06:30, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Bohemian Baltimore. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Category:Christianity in Pakistan by city has been nominated for discussion
Category:Christianity in Pakistan by city, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:46, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
Category:Native American Jews has been nominated for discussion
Category:Native American Jews, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:58, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Category:Shinto in Japan by city has been nominated for discussion
Category:Shinto in Japan by city, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:21, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Category:Buddhism in Seoul has been nominated for discussion
Category:Buddhism in Seoul, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:29, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Category:Christianity in Bangkok has been nominated for discussion
Category:Christianity in Bangkok, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 10:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Category:Religion in Afghanistan by city has been nominated for discussion
Category:Religion in Afghanistan by city, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:47, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Category:Religion in Hagerstown, Maryland has been nominated for discussion
Category:Religion in Hagerstown, Maryland, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 08:15, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Category:Christianity in Copenhagen has been nominated for discussion
Category:Christianity in Copenhagen, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 08:31, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Category:Latgalians has been nominated for discussion
Category:Latgalians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 07:49, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Just want to say "Thank You" for divorcing AfterEllen from AfterElton. If you were not responding to my proposal to do so, then you read my mind. :-) Pyxis Solitary yak 12:21, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Articles should not be moved that way. Always used the "Move" option at the top of an article or got to WP:Requested moves if you need admin help to move an article. I've taken the AfterEllen.com matter to WP:Requested moves for a WP:Histmerge. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 01:31, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bohemian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lusatians ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:11, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Category:Religion in Iraq by city has been nominated for discussion
Category:Religion in Iraq by city, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:51, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
Category:Religion in the Arab world by city has been nominated for discussion
Category:Religion in the Arab world by city, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 06:54, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
No clue what I’m doing. Just poking around trying to figure it all out. JLicher69 ( talk) 03:36, 26 May 2019 (UTC)