This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Noose. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Noose redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Alakzi ( talk) 20:44, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to let you know that an AfD that you participated in has been reopened here. I am informing everyone who participated in the old one case they would like to provide insight. Thank you. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 05:58, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Minneapolis Institute of Art edit-a-thon | |
---|---|
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The Loft Literary Center edit-a-thon | |
---|---|
|
right things | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 821 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 05:36, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Aunva6. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13 Talk 15:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. 2607:FB90:6650:30FC:DFBF:FF1:5C59:B932 ( talk) 06:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Little Aunva turn up, welcome! [Bishzilla stuffs the little Aunva6 firmly in her pocket.] bishzilla ROARR!! 23:58, 22 March 2017 (UTC).
Hello A. Thanks for trying to get the I.G. Gently article protected. I hadn't seen the decline when I asked for protection several minutes ago. I added some information to my report including a link to the thread that I started on the talk page. We will see how things turn out. I appreciate your efforts in this so thanks again. Cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 15:36, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Three years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
I was in the middle of adding my sources, but you reverted all of my changes before I was able to (which was a little presumptuous). I'm sure you used to Kingston Members trying to edit the page in their favor, but I assure that was not my intention. I was simply trying to make the page honest and unbiased. (I actually removed many statements that had no citations and were clearly opinions of ex-members.) I know many of the Kingstons and am aware of many sources that are not the "top hits" in Google, showing more of the truth than what is displayed. You'll also find that most of the source links on the page are outdated and direct to a source that is not available anymore. If you will kindly let me finish my work (including adding the sources), you would find it more accurate and better sourced than it has been in the past.
Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.219.77.45 ( talk) 06:29, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello Aunva6. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various
deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at
page reviewer talk.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 06:18, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello Aunva6. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of VTI-TEBBAP, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being part of a notable entity indicates importance/significance ( WP:CCSI#CORP, WP:CCSI#ORG). Thank you. So Why 06:38, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
please delay your proposal of deletion for a much note worthy translation prize page /info/en/?search=Lucien_Stryk_Asian_Translation_Prizes ... until concerned parties may concur on moving it under a subsection of THE said Prize founder Lycien_Stryk perhaps? Thank you in advance for your kind consideration - editor/translator s.ye LairdUnlimited ( talk) 16:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC) |
Hello Aunva6. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kidz Bop 25, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: please check the history of a page before tagging for speedy deletion. Previous versions included claims of significance as well as a plausible redirect. Thank you. So Why 12:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, when you add a prod to an article, please add a reason for getting rid of the page. I noticed this happen on The effects of iron ore mining on Labrador's biophysical environment. Then people that write the page know why and what to change in future, the deleters do not need to look for a reason themselves, and the delete log will tell why it had to go. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 06:33, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Recommend adding this template and procedure: Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Requesting_multiple_page_moves .. so things will go smoothly. -- Green C 18:33, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Aunva6. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).
Please take a moment to review
Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially
the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow
post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using
Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 05:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Please note that when relisting move discussions you should use the {{subst:relisting}} template not the {{subst:relist}} template (which is used for relisting deletion discussions). Also, the template should be placed at the very end of the initial request (after their signature, and subsequent re-listers signatures). — Insert CleverPhrase Here 00:11, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
As far as I can see you closed the voting only after a week, this is a very short time for review of such controversial move. Please can I ask for the request to be re-opened so that more editors can voice their opinions?-- MyMoloboaccount ( talk) 10:50, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Aunva6. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Kerbal Space Program at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Paradoxasauruser ( talk) 12:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC) |
The article Kerbal Space Program you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Kerbal Space Program for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 06:37, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, this is something I've seen before but I never quite understood. Here was the situation:
And it was decided that the film was the primary topic for the term "submergence", and so you moved from Submergence (film) over Submergence (the dab page), and fine.
But now I want to make a hatnote at
Submergence (the film article) pointing to
Submergence (disambiguation) for the other meanings. To make
Submergence (disambiguation) be a dab page (rather than just a redirect as it remains for now) I need to access the old history of
Submergence when it was a dab page so I can copy it (I don't remember exactly what was on the old
Submergence dab page). But I can't find it. It can't have disappeared, but I can't find contributions by me in the history of
Submergence anymore.... where is this history?
Herostratus (
talk) 18:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Nevermind! I found it, at
Draft:Submergence... OK it was a round-robin I guess, which I'm not too familiar with... nevermind, everything OK, carry on.
Herostratus (
talk) 18:57, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Hey A6, I think if you count the !votes carefully you'll find more in favor of a move to Hilton Worldwide than Hilton Worldwide Holdings. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 20:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Done yeah, i missed the partabout there being a longstanding precedent. i moved it to Hilton Worldwide -- Aunva6 talk - contribs 05:01, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Why are you supporting a topic ban? Can you please explain here? Valoem talk contrib 18:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 814 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!
But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.
Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).
?fuzzy=1
to the URL, as with
Special:Undelete?fuzzy=1. Currently the search only finds pages that exactly match the search term.Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).
Query | |
I haven't used this account in a long time and just logged in. For some odd reason, you threatened (a few years ago) to remove me for supposedly "vandalizing" some page. I never did any such thing, and I have NO idea what you were talking about. Please explain. Thank you.
Faxizz*2 ( talk) 23:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC) |
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Please advise what the problems are? Crawiki ( talk) 16:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).
Hi Aunva6. Sorry for the trouble, but I just came across another hook, which I think is more interesting. Can you please check it at your convenience. Thank you. Dr. K. 02:57, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi.
In
this edit, you misplaced the relisting comment. The relisting comment should be added exactly after the signature of the nominator. In case it is a second relist, then it should be after the first relisting comment. In this instance, you posted the relisting comment after first vote. I
corrected it. Dont worry, all the page movers have done that mistake sometime or another. ;)
See you around. —usernamekiran
(talk) 06:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Aunva6. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).
Backlog update:
Outreach and Invitations:
{{subst:NPR invite}}
. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.New Year New Page Review Drive
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, but this new page (which is undergoing dispute resolution, judging by its history) is too unstable for a copyedit at this time. Please feel free to relist it when it settles down. Thanks and all the best, Mini apolis 18:06, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!
We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!
The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.
Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:
NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).
Backlog update:
New Year Backlog Drive results:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).
contains_all
that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.ACTRIAL:
Paid editing
Subject-specific notability guidelines
Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
News
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:39, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).
equals_to_any
function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to
see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to
Logstash.This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Noose. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Noose redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Alakzi ( talk) 20:44, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I wanted to let you know that an AfD that you participated in has been reopened here. I am informing everyone who participated in the old one case they would like to provide insight. Thank you. Seahorseruler (Talk Page) (Contribs) 05:58, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Minneapolis Institute of Art edit-a-thon | |
---|---|
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The Loft Literary Center edit-a-thon | |
---|---|
|
right things | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 821 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 05:36, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Aunva6. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13 Talk 15:51, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. 2607:FB90:6650:30FC:DFBF:FF1:5C59:B932 ( talk) 06:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Little Aunva turn up, welcome! [Bishzilla stuffs the little Aunva6 firmly in her pocket.] bishzilla ROARR!! 23:58, 22 March 2017 (UTC).
Hello A. Thanks for trying to get the I.G. Gently article protected. I hadn't seen the decline when I asked for protection several minutes ago. I added some information to my report including a link to the thread that I started on the talk page. We will see how things turn out. I appreciate your efforts in this so thanks again. Cheers. MarnetteD| Talk 15:36, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Three years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
I was in the middle of adding my sources, but you reverted all of my changes before I was able to (which was a little presumptuous). I'm sure you used to Kingston Members trying to edit the page in their favor, but I assure that was not my intention. I was simply trying to make the page honest and unbiased. (I actually removed many statements that had no citations and were clearly opinions of ex-members.) I know many of the Kingstons and am aware of many sources that are not the "top hits" in Google, showing more of the truth than what is displayed. You'll also find that most of the source links on the page are outdated and direct to a source that is not available anymore. If you will kindly let me finish my work (including adding the sources), you would find it more accurate and better sourced than it has been in the past.
Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.219.77.45 ( talk) 06:29, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello Aunva6. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various
deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at
page reviewer talk.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 06:18, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello Aunva6. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of VTI-TEBBAP, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being part of a notable entity indicates importance/significance ( WP:CCSI#CORP, WP:CCSI#ORG). Thank you. So Why 06:38, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
please delay your proposal of deletion for a much note worthy translation prize page /info/en/?search=Lucien_Stryk_Asian_Translation_Prizes ... until concerned parties may concur on moving it under a subsection of THE said Prize founder Lycien_Stryk perhaps? Thank you in advance for your kind consideration - editor/translator s.ye LairdUnlimited ( talk) 16:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC) |
Hello Aunva6. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kidz Bop 25, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: please check the history of a page before tagging for speedy deletion. Previous versions included claims of significance as well as a plausible redirect. Thank you. So Why 12:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, when you add a prod to an article, please add a reason for getting rid of the page. I noticed this happen on The effects of iron ore mining on Labrador's biophysical environment. Then people that write the page know why and what to change in future, the deleters do not need to look for a reason themselves, and the delete log will tell why it had to go. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 06:33, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Recommend adding this template and procedure: Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Requesting_multiple_page_moves .. so things will go smoothly. -- Green C 18:33, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Aunva6. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).
Please take a moment to review
Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially
the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow
post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using
Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to
secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status
can be revoked.
Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Lord Roem ~ ( talk) 05:38, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Please note that when relisting move discussions you should use the {{subst:relisting}} template not the {{subst:relist}} template (which is used for relisting deletion discussions). Also, the template should be placed at the very end of the initial request (after their signature, and subsequent re-listers signatures). — Insert CleverPhrase Here 00:11, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
As far as I can see you closed the voting only after a week, this is a very short time for review of such controversial move. Please can I ask for the request to be re-opened so that more editors can voice their opinions?-- MyMoloboaccount ( talk) 10:50, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Aunva6. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Kerbal Space Program at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Paradoxasauruser ( talk) 12:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC) |
The article Kerbal Space Program you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Kerbal Space Program for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Anarchyte ( work | talk) 06:37, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, this is something I've seen before but I never quite understood. Here was the situation:
And it was decided that the film was the primary topic for the term "submergence", and so you moved from Submergence (film) over Submergence (the dab page), and fine.
But now I want to make a hatnote at
Submergence (the film article) pointing to
Submergence (disambiguation) for the other meanings. To make
Submergence (disambiguation) be a dab page (rather than just a redirect as it remains for now) I need to access the old history of
Submergence when it was a dab page so I can copy it (I don't remember exactly what was on the old
Submergence dab page). But I can't find it. It can't have disappeared, but I can't find contributions by me in the history of
Submergence anymore.... where is this history?
Herostratus (
talk) 18:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Nevermind! I found it, at
Draft:Submergence... OK it was a round-robin I guess, which I'm not too familiar with... nevermind, everything OK, carry on.
Herostratus (
talk) 18:57, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Hey A6, I think if you count the !votes carefully you'll find more in favor of a move to Hilton Worldwide than Hilton Worldwide Holdings. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 20:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Done yeah, i missed the partabout there being a longstanding precedent. i moved it to Hilton Worldwide -- Aunva6 talk - contribs 05:01, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Why are you supporting a topic ban? Can you please explain here? Valoem talk contrib 18:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 814 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!
But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.
Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).
?fuzzy=1
to the URL, as with
Special:Undelete?fuzzy=1. Currently the search only finds pages that exactly match the search term.Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017).
Query | |
I haven't used this account in a long time and just logged in. For some odd reason, you threatened (a few years ago) to remove me for supposedly "vandalizing" some page. I never did any such thing, and I have NO idea what you were talking about. Please explain. Thank you.
Faxizz*2 ( talk) 23:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC) |
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).
Backlog update:
Technology update:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni ( talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Please advise what the problems are? Crawiki ( talk) 16:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).
Hi Aunva6. Sorry for the trouble, but I just came across another hook, which I think is more interesting. Can you please check it at your convenience. Thank you. Dr. K. 02:57, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi.
In
this edit, you misplaced the relisting comment. The relisting comment should be added exactly after the signature of the nominator. In case it is a second relist, then it should be after the first relisting comment. In this instance, you posted the relisting comment after first vote. I
corrected it. Dont worry, all the page movers have done that mistake sometime or another. ;)
See you around. —usernamekiran
(talk) 06:00, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Aunva6. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).
Backlog update:
Outreach and Invitations:
{{subst:NPR invite}}
. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.New Year New Page Review Drive
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, but this new page (which is undergoing dispute resolution, judging by its history) is too unstable for a copyedit at this time. Please feel free to relist it when it settles down. Thanks and all the best, Mini apolis 18:06, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!
We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!
The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.
Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:
NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni ( talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).
Backlog update:
New Year Backlog Drive results:
General project update:
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).
contains_all
that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.ACTRIAL:
Paid editing
Subject-specific notability guidelines
Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
News
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).
Four years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:39, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).
equals_to_any
function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to
see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to
Logstash.