Aude | Maps | Photography | Toolbox | To-do | Talk |
---|
Hello Aude/Archive 1 and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
Good luck!
RE: Roper v. Simmons, Thanks for the correction. Vaoverland 18:22, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
Hey. Good job on the Roper v. Simmons article; the references section is particularly impressive - it's rare that people bother with footnotes in their article. Kudos!
I've posted a question about the current status of the PAC sub-project on the SCOTUS Cases discussion page. I don't know that anyone is still actively working on it - it's been some time, and I have not heard back from any of the members listed on the project page. Is the PAC project something that you would be willing to work on along with me?
Thanks for reverting the New Jersey Devils article back to the way I had left it. I'm not sure why it was changed in the first place. I did offer the person who changed it a chance to explain himself, but it's just as well you changed it back. -- Cholmes75 18:17, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Castaneda1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. |
-- Bash 22:02, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
Started up WikiProject Washington Metro to help improve the articles on the Metro, and hope you'll join us. Schuminweb 01:08, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Can you source the Miers things? I haven't seen any news on it yet... and it's not on Google news. gren グレン 13:24, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
A direct quote by the Dr, who treated Kerry uses the same three words I use" "injury", "superficial" and "small". Did you bother to read the Dr.'s statement? Rex071404 216.153.214.94 00:07, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Good luck with your proposed wikiproject. I've recently run into confusion regarding 'source spam' involving books listed in Further reading sections ( WP:CITE#External_links/Further_reading). I think Further reading as opposed to External links are important as used in places like Green Tortoise, but want to make sure to formalize a policy to combat spam. My efforts are elsewhere at the moment... but I'll keep an eye on! ;) ∴ here… ♠ 00:39, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
The project sounds like a great idea, and I like your stringent guidelines for links in your subpage. Note however that if the project gets off the ground, we need to make sure that there's no double standard between Wikipedia:External links and the project criteria. -- DDerby- (talk) 07:02, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Hi. I'm not sure I agree with putting all the mountains of the Canadian Rockies in this category. Eventually, this category will be mostly filled with mountain articles (hundreds at least) which will obscure the other articles. I might suggest creating a "list" article and just have that in the category. May want to consider discussing this on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mountains before adding more mountains. RedWolf 06:28, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
on (I think the URL is) Talk:WikiProject Usability/Main Page/Draft. :) 64.231.254.54 13:37, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
This video examines public videos of the several attacks on 9/11. It demonstrates substantially different facts from the article. This IS important and deserves your review before deletion. Consider the contents of this video:
* [View this Video Documentary of WTC Collapse including the first building strike.] (I have removed the linkspam, though it's still in the edit history ---
Aude 04:18, 28 December 2005 (UTC))
This link is accessible, it is proper (ie. useful), it is entered correctly AND is in the external link section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.165.243.38 ( talk • contribs) 00:13, 9 December 2005
Hi there:
I've noticed that you've taken to renaming articles such as "Logan Circle (Washington, D.C.)" to "Logan Circle, Washington, D.C.". Is there a reason why you're doing this? My understanding of Wikipedia is that, in general, article titles should take the form of a name one would use in text, with a disambiguator in parentheses if this is non-unique. WikiMedia even has a special syntax for this: if you type in "[[Logan Circle (Washington, D.C.)|]]", it automatically substitutes to "[[Logan Circle (Washington, D.C.)|Logan Circle]]" upon save. Most people write "Logan Circle" in their articles; almost none write "Logan Circle, Washington, D.C."
Please reply to me here. I will leave this page watchlisted for the next three days.
— DLJessup ( talk) 14:44, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
I saw on the Washington page you were looking for DC GIS data. Check out dcgis.dc.gov, then Dataset Search, there is a lot available on there for free. Awiseman 20:57, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
First, please see my entry on the Savannah talk page.
Do you have any source that Savannah is called "the hostess city?" My family has lived here for generations and I've lived here my whole life and I have never heard of either nickname currently on that page. The only one that's used that everybody has knowledge of in this area is the "Coastal Empire." -- BWD 21:55, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas! As I mentioned in the other discussion, I am slowly working on various "minor" areas of the National Park System. Right now I have three tasks:
If you are interested in helping out, or have any questions, just drop me a line. — Eoghanacht talk 17:14, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi, yes. It is a template {{subst:anon vandal}}. It's best if you give this to persistent vandals who have been blocked on previous occasions. For vandals who have never been blocked before, it's best to give them the usual test1, 2, 3 and 4. Remember, this template is for anon vandals only, as it extends an invitation to open an account. Keep up the good work :-) Izehar ( talk) 16:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
I left you a note on the hybrid talk page. uriah923( talk) 15:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC) And another. uriah923( talk) 17:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC) Yet again. uriah923( talk) 23:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Thank you, I see what u meant. buenosdiers
Too late, I blocked him already. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Why the heck are you vandalizing my edits!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.42.7.170 ( talk • contribs)
What does this one think of the movement? -- Kin Khan 02:01, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Hey Kmf164! Thanks for your support on my RfA. The final outcome was an unanimous (45/0/0), so I am now an administrator. If you need help, or have a question, please don't hesitate to let me know! Again, thanks! :D -- Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 03:37, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed on Grand Canyon you changed the pics. I spent 5 hours getting those pics right, and because of the pics the article was even nominated as an FA. I saw that you started tampering with the pics today. Before you did, they were as good as can be. I think you had good intentions, but I had to revert. Tobyk777 22:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
I see your point. I also got similar criticism from another guy. I will unrevert the reverts. I think I overdid the pics sorry. Tobyk777 03:08, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
I would really like to use Image:Chetwynd BC Road Network.JPG in the Chetwynd article. Was it that I was using the wrong tag or is just not permitted. What about the unaltered version straight from the source: www.hellonorth.com (the pdf tourist magazine)? Is there a tag that would allow me to use that? Also, I think that BC and Canada are the same for copyrights. At my work we have a license to use the geo-referenced data on these airphotos, but we can do what we please with the images (give them away, publish them - once we publish an agenda they are public property, etc.). maclean25 16:36, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the major copyedits on this page. It was indeed copied directly off the Corner Bakery site and I did it. I was planning on rewriting the article with original content. I understand the seriousness of copyright violations and I apologize for them. At the time I made this page I did not fully understand Wikipedia's copyright and other policies. Thank you for fixing this page! Dustimagic 23:41, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know about the link policy. The videos I put up, however, were pretty unique: how often do you get to hear from a hostage negotiator about ongoing events in Iraq? The show has a rather large collection of video, some of which (but not all) has relevance to the ongoing coverage of topics at Wikipedia. My intent is merely to share the content, not to spam the site; do you have any advice regarding how to balance (the positive) "contribution" with (the negative) "spam" for non-text material? JTBurman 20:18, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
|
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
March 18, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC | |
---|---|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. This month, as part of Wikimedia NYC's commitment to the well-being of members, we will hold WikiWednesday online via Zoom videoconferencing! To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! Is there a project you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? A Wiki* skill you'd like to learn? Let us know by adding it to the agenda.
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! -- Wikimedia New York City Team 04:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC) |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
Aude | Maps | Photography | Toolbox | To-do | Talk |
---|
Archives: August 2004 – December 2005 · January – April 2006 · April - June 2006 · July – September 2006 · October - December 2006 · January - April 2007 · May - July 2007 · July 2007 - April 2008 · April 2008 - October 2008 · November 2008 - February 2009 · March - November 2009 · December 2009 - December 2010 · December 2010 - December 2011 · January 2012 - April 2013 · May 2013 - May 2014 · June 2014 - August 2015 · September 2015 - July 2017 · August 2017 - July 2018 · July 2018 - March 2020 |
|
---|
Hello Aude/Archive 1 and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
Good luck!
RE: Roper v. Simmons, Thanks for the correction. Vaoverland 18:22, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
Hey. Good job on the Roper v. Simmons article; the references section is particularly impressive - it's rare that people bother with footnotes in their article. Kudos!
I've posted a question about the current status of the PAC sub-project on the SCOTUS Cases discussion page. I don't know that anyone is still actively working on it - it's been some time, and I have not heard back from any of the members listed on the project page. Is the PAC project something that you would be willing to work on along with me?
Thanks for reverting the New Jersey Devils article back to the way I had left it. I'm not sure why it was changed in the first place. I did offer the person who changed it a chance to explain himself, but it's just as well you changed it back. -- Cholmes75 18:17, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Castaneda1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. |
-- Bash 22:02, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
Started up WikiProject Washington Metro to help improve the articles on the Metro, and hope you'll join us. Schuminweb 01:08, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Can you source the Miers things? I haven't seen any news on it yet... and it's not on Google news. gren グレン 13:24, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
A direct quote by the Dr, who treated Kerry uses the same three words I use" "injury", "superficial" and "small". Did you bother to read the Dr.'s statement? Rex071404 216.153.214.94 00:07, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
Good luck with your proposed wikiproject. I've recently run into confusion regarding 'source spam' involving books listed in Further reading sections ( WP:CITE#External_links/Further_reading). I think Further reading as opposed to External links are important as used in places like Green Tortoise, but want to make sure to formalize a policy to combat spam. My efforts are elsewhere at the moment... but I'll keep an eye on! ;) ∴ here… ♠ 00:39, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
The project sounds like a great idea, and I like your stringent guidelines for links in your subpage. Note however that if the project gets off the ground, we need to make sure that there's no double standard between Wikipedia:External links and the project criteria. -- DDerby- (talk) 07:02, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Hi. I'm not sure I agree with putting all the mountains of the Canadian Rockies in this category. Eventually, this category will be mostly filled with mountain articles (hundreds at least) which will obscure the other articles. I might suggest creating a "list" article and just have that in the category. May want to consider discussing this on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mountains before adding more mountains. RedWolf 06:28, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
on (I think the URL is) Talk:WikiProject Usability/Main Page/Draft. :) 64.231.254.54 13:37, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
This video examines public videos of the several attacks on 9/11. It demonstrates substantially different facts from the article. This IS important and deserves your review before deletion. Consider the contents of this video:
* [View this Video Documentary of WTC Collapse including the first building strike.] (I have removed the linkspam, though it's still in the edit history ---
Aude 04:18, 28 December 2005 (UTC))
This link is accessible, it is proper (ie. useful), it is entered correctly AND is in the external link section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.165.243.38 ( talk • contribs) 00:13, 9 December 2005
Hi there:
I've noticed that you've taken to renaming articles such as "Logan Circle (Washington, D.C.)" to "Logan Circle, Washington, D.C.". Is there a reason why you're doing this? My understanding of Wikipedia is that, in general, article titles should take the form of a name one would use in text, with a disambiguator in parentheses if this is non-unique. WikiMedia even has a special syntax for this: if you type in "[[Logan Circle (Washington, D.C.)|]]", it automatically substitutes to "[[Logan Circle (Washington, D.C.)|Logan Circle]]" upon save. Most people write "Logan Circle" in their articles; almost none write "Logan Circle, Washington, D.C."
Please reply to me here. I will leave this page watchlisted for the next three days.
— DLJessup ( talk) 14:44, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
I saw on the Washington page you were looking for DC GIS data. Check out dcgis.dc.gov, then Dataset Search, there is a lot available on there for free. Awiseman 20:57, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
First, please see my entry on the Savannah talk page.
Do you have any source that Savannah is called "the hostess city?" My family has lived here for generations and I've lived here my whole life and I have never heard of either nickname currently on that page. The only one that's used that everybody has knowledge of in this area is the "Coastal Empire." -- BWD 21:55, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas! As I mentioned in the other discussion, I am slowly working on various "minor" areas of the National Park System. Right now I have three tasks:
If you are interested in helping out, or have any questions, just drop me a line. — Eoghanacht talk 17:14, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi, yes. It is a template {{subst:anon vandal}}. It's best if you give this to persistent vandals who have been blocked on previous occasions. For vandals who have never been blocked before, it's best to give them the usual test1, 2, 3 and 4. Remember, this template is for anon vandals only, as it extends an invitation to open an account. Keep up the good work :-) Izehar ( talk) 16:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
I left you a note on the hybrid talk page. uriah923( talk) 15:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC) And another. uriah923( talk) 17:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC) Yet again. uriah923( talk) 23:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Thank you, I see what u meant. buenosdiers
Too late, I blocked him already. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Why the heck are you vandalizing my edits!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.42.7.170 ( talk • contribs)
What does this one think of the movement? -- Kin Khan 02:01, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Hey Kmf164! Thanks for your support on my RfA. The final outcome was an unanimous (45/0/0), so I am now an administrator. If you need help, or have a question, please don't hesitate to let me know! Again, thanks! :D -- Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 03:37, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed on Grand Canyon you changed the pics. I spent 5 hours getting those pics right, and because of the pics the article was even nominated as an FA. I saw that you started tampering with the pics today. Before you did, they were as good as can be. I think you had good intentions, but I had to revert. Tobyk777 22:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
I see your point. I also got similar criticism from another guy. I will unrevert the reverts. I think I overdid the pics sorry. Tobyk777 03:08, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
I would really like to use Image:Chetwynd BC Road Network.JPG in the Chetwynd article. Was it that I was using the wrong tag or is just not permitted. What about the unaltered version straight from the source: www.hellonorth.com (the pdf tourist magazine)? Is there a tag that would allow me to use that? Also, I think that BC and Canada are the same for copyrights. At my work we have a license to use the geo-referenced data on these airphotos, but we can do what we please with the images (give them away, publish them - once we publish an agenda they are public property, etc.). maclean25 16:36, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing the major copyedits on this page. It was indeed copied directly off the Corner Bakery site and I did it. I was planning on rewriting the article with original content. I understand the seriousness of copyright violations and I apologize for them. At the time I made this page I did not fully understand Wikipedia's copyright and other policies. Thank you for fixing this page! Dustimagic 23:41, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know about the link policy. The videos I put up, however, were pretty unique: how often do you get to hear from a hostage negotiator about ongoing events in Iraq? The show has a rather large collection of video, some of which (but not all) has relevance to the ongoing coverage of topics at Wikipedia. My intent is merely to share the content, not to spam the site; do you have any advice regarding how to balance (the positive) "contribution" with (the negative) "spam" for non-text material? JTBurman 20:18, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
|
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
March 18, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC | |
---|---|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. This month, as part of Wikimedia NYC's commitment to the well-being of members, we will hold WikiWednesday online via Zoom videoconferencing! To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! Is there a project you'd like to share? A question you'd like answered? A Wiki* skill you'd like to learn? Let us know by adding it to the agenda.
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! -- Wikimedia New York City Team 04:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC) |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.