Excellent work on the expansion of her article. I've removed the stub tag. And welcome to Wikipedia! Lugnuts ( talk) 17:46, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Gtwfan52 ( talk) 01:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
You recently disputed the neutrality of the article on the Sadler report giving the following reasons:
This whole article is not only argumentative, it is based exclusively on Austrian School Economic arguments and citesA . All of the "economic historians" are libertarian-Mises Institute types. There are no citations to historians of British political history at all. Moreover, it is not written like an encyclopedia article. It is shaped solely to agree with a certain view of political economyB C >. AnthroMimus ( talk) 13:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
(A) As a statement of fact, this has serious problems. When you posted that, the article gave 25 references, only four of which were in any way from the Austrian School or libertarian community; and those references were given to establish that there were critics of the report. Neither the presence of these gentlemen in the references nor the absence of other references to political historians establishes a non-neutral POV – can you point to any significant misrepresentation, misreporting or weasel words in the current text? (In any case what additional information/insight is a 21-st century historian supposed to be able to provide that Sadler’s contemporaries could not?)
(B) This would appear both to assume bad faith in others, and to presume to tell them what their politics are. Where I come from, that would be thought to be bad form verging on unbelievably rude
(C) You give no specific instance of non-neutrality needing to be addressed, beyond letting us know that you do not share the views on political economy of some of the references. Those views are not promoted in the article; they are not even mentioned.
There are two separate issues; the desirability of state intervention in man-master relationships, and the accuracy of the evidence Sadler adduced in favour of such intervention. One does not have to be opposed to the ‘big state’ to think Sadler’s report unreliable. It is possible to believe that
But it is also possible to believe that
Since Mr Sadler, his committee and the progress of factory legislation in pre-Victorian England seem to be at some remove from subjects on which you have previously contributed, and it is not immediately apparent that you have fully digested the body of the article, the following précis (more opinionated/argumentative than the article) may help you:
The report is of a Select Committee of the British House of Commons, to the House as whole, and was in support of legislation restricting the working hours of young children. The House debated the report and effectively took view (4) . In setting up a Factory Commission to investigate the same topic it rejected the report (and the evidence given to the Committee) as unreliable. It did so not because it did not believe the state should interfere in such matters (it went on to pass the 1833 Factory Act, which not only intervened in principle, but took care to establish a mechanism by which the state could intervene effectively in practice) but because it believed (from strong circumstantial evidence) that Sadler had been pulling a fast one, and could not be sure that some of his witnesses were not spinning a yarn. Explicit rejection of a Select Committee Report is unusual, and fairly damning. After the Factory Commission's report , Sadler's report came to be seen by his contemporaries as a 'dodgy dossier' (see quote from Gaskell in the article, or chase up Engels’ views as given in ‘The Condition of the Working Class in England’)
When subsequent generations started giving more credence to Sadler's report, Hutt et al had a greater incentive to counter this (by pointing out the contemporary objections) than those in sympathy with factory legislation; but the fact that it was Hutt who re-voiced those objections does not justify tarring others pointing them out (or those who originally voiced them) with the same brush. (One might as well say that since Hitler was in favour of building motorways any argument for building more motorways is ‘shaped to agree’ with National Socialism)
If you were 'shooting from the hip', then I suggest you remove your POV sticker ; if you wish to keep it posted, I would ask you to supply fresh grounds and or better arguments. Regards Rjccumbria ( talk) 20:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:NYTimes Saturday Night Massacre Front Page.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. The bot DID NOT tag your file(s) for deletion, so if you would like to know who tagged the file(s), please refer to the edit history of each individual file. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
HazelAB ( talk) 17:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi AnthroMimus,
You should have access to Newspapers.com now. I think it's okay to leave the citations you have linking to articles at fultonhistory.com. However, the site's FAQ does include the following: "Q. Can I put a link on my site to yours? A. Yes. But PLEASE, use ONLY www.fultonhistory.com / Other pages and links change as updates occur." So that might mean some of your links might be lost at some point. (Quite a website, by the way - I'm glad to know about it!)
I think you'll like Newspapers.com and its clipping feature, which lets you clip and link to individual stories you have cited. All the information about clipping is on the Wikipedia:Newspapers.com site. Note that our free accounts through the Wikipedia Library don't include "publisher extra" content. All the best, HazelAB ( talk) 15:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hey AnthroMimus, I noticed your work on this article. Great additions! However, I also noticed that you haven't edited that article in a week. Is it okay if I remove the {{ under construction}} template and clean up the article a little? Regards, epicgenius, presented by reddit.com/r/funny ( talk) 01:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thank you for making the page "Squanto" a good deal better! I award you the Barnstar of Diligence. Hdjensofjfnen ( U T C) 03:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC) |
Hello, I applied for a Wikipedia:Taylor & Francis account awhile back ago. I never heard anything back about it despite Wikipedia:Taylor & Francis/Approved saying I was approved.-- KAVEBEAR ( talk) 22:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and resubmitted another request via the new means. Thanks.-- KAVEBEAR ( talk) 07:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hobbamock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Hopkins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-- Cameron11598 (Talk) 04:10, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi AnthroMimus, How are you? I was told your the T&L admin. I need some extra articles from T&L that I can't get access to. What is the mechanism to get hold of them, if it is available?. I was assigned a T&L account on the defense and strategy folder I think, and thought it would have covered what I was looking for. Unfortunately not. Is there any mechanism available to get hold of them. I think the problem lies in the fact T&L organizes it's articles within verticals, whereas here, by the nature of WP editing culture, it is horizontal. scope_creep ( talk) 14:54, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
The journals I'm looking to get access to are Cryptologia, International Journal of Intelligence and Counter Intelligence and Intelligence and National Security. Only for these article. Fundamentally what I've been working on and currently working. Thanks for the quick response. scope_creep ( talk) 21:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
@ Scope creep: Have you heard from T&F yet? AnthroMimus ( talk) 04:36, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Reply Back------------------------------------
Mr. Watson,
I have electronic access to all the Taylor & Francis journals through the library of Saint Mary's College of California where I used to work (I am now retired). Normally, this connection allows me full access to articles in the International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, but for some reason that access is denied for the volume (No. 9) that contains my article on Pers Z.
I searched my electronic files, but cannot locate the manuscript version of the article as submitted to the journal way back when. When I retired and relocated to a small village in northern New Mexico, I significantly down-sized my life, including the electronic side of that life, and the electronic manuscript of "Diplomatic Solutions" may have been a casualty of the process.
I will see if I still have a hard copy of the journal and if I do I will scan the article and email it to you.
Thank you for your interest in my past work. There can't be more than a dozen people in the world who know--let alone care--about PersZ.
David
My email.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Bob Watson <xxxxx@hotmail.com> wrote: Dear Professor David Alvarez Let me introduce myself. My name is Bob Watson, and I’m an editor on Wikipedia with the username of scope_creep. I am currently trying to find an article on the AA/Pers Z S organization, which I hope you know was the diplomatic signal intelligence organization for the German Foreign Office from 1919 to the end of World War 2. The article can be found at: /info/en/?search=Pers_Z_S
The article as it stands is full of facts, using released WW2 TICOM documentation, but doesn’t contain any critical analysis, which it really needs. I found out that Wikipedia was creating strategic partnerships with certain types of archives, like NARA, Oxford University Press and a bunch of others. I spotted one, which was Taylor and Francis, and signed up, got a bunch of articles, which I used as sources for missing information in other articles, like Wilhelm Fenner, and B-Dienst.
I need a T&L article to help provide that critical analysis which is at the following url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08850609608435314
Under the agreement with them, I specified Defence category and the International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence unfortunately wasn’t in it. They have promised to fix it and so far no luck. I can tell you, I’m champing at the bit for the article. Would it be possible to get it off yourself.
19:35, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
Great job on starting your first article from scratch: Maryam Shahriar. It so awesome that you are covering non-Western Women and their work in the film community: works to combat the WP:BIAS that you describe on your user page! Keep up the great work. Sadads ( talk) 01:21, 9 May 2017 (UTC) |
Hi AnthroMimus, How goes it? Any word back from T & L? scope_creep ( talk) 10:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
I have not heard anything from T&F either. - PKM ( talk) 18:49, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
@ Scope creep: and @ PKM: Good news, sorta, I guess. It seems that Wikipedia's contact at T&F is no longer there and no replacement has been made. "We're working on it," as they say, and I'll keep you posted. AnthroMimus ( talk) 13:52, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
@ Scope creep: @ PKM: @ K.e.coffman: There are probably others who are affected by this but since the platform does not make it easy for anyone to communicate with editors (or even track down who they are) once they are sent on to the "partners" I'll address you three who I know about here, so that any questions, comments, updates can be in one place. The short answer is I simply cannot get T&F to respond to me. The publisher and an editor have for a week both had my email alerting them that they have not approved editors for 1-1/2 months and that I haven't had my emails answered. They have acted in like manner: They do not response to my emails. I have conducted the highest "official" I know at Wikimedia (he has to be high since he is a paid consultant) and am awaiting suggestions. I really do not know whether and if so when T&F intends to continue the "partnership." AnthroMimus ( talk) 17:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
@ Scope creep: You should be hearing shortly from Geraldine Richards, an Editorial Assistant, Routledge US Arts & Humanities Journals Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. She has the list of the 10 articles you flagged and is looking into it (or at least she is going to deal with you directly). AnthroMimus ( talk) 19:19, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
As it happens, publication of the journal Costume (and its back issues) has moved from Taylor & Francis to the University of Edinburgh. That was my main motivation for getting access to T&F, so if it never happens now I won't be terribly disappointed. I really appreciate your efforts so far, but don't spend any more energy on this on my behalf. - PKM ( talk) 19:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
A changeover in personnel has seemed to have caused confusion at T&F about who is supposed to have access via the Wikipedia Library Platform. In the hopes of ensuring everyone who was approved gets access I want to make a list here so I can advise T&F who is waiting for access. Please let me know if you have been granted access and if possible when (or how long you estimate it was after you application was sent until you got access). If you do not have access now, but receive it in the near future, can you also update your response and let me know when you got access? Many thanks (I am going to bild this list from most recent to oldest approvals). AnthroMimus ( talk) 21:34, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, AnthroMimus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi AnthroMimus. My request for access to Taylor & Francis through TWL was just closed as "Not approved". Is there any particular reason why? -- Xover ( talk) 05:09, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Horst Dassler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Hall ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Alessandro, Signor of Ottajano. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please, assume good faith when addressing other editors. I also noticed your behavior towards User:Accesscrawl in article Saki. We are here with one goal and we are all here need to be polite towards each other. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 10:37, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
I replied on my open library application - basically if Arts & Humanities isn't available would you be able to sign me up for Strategic, Defence & Security Studies? Seraphim System ( talk) 18:06, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, AnthroMimus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, AnthroMimus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
you access this book? Regards, ∯WBG converse 17:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi AM. Referring to this message; [1] any update? :-) - LouisAragon ( talk) 00:59, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi AnthroMimus, I have started a discussion over our Village pump with the aim of maintaining a public list of all editors who are granted access to any TWL resource. Your thoughts and opinions on the proposal are welcome:-) Regards, ∯WBG converse
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Village Voice Film Poll, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Miller and Carlos ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:17, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
hi, I was wondering about [2] I have'nt received any email from them?-- Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 20:11, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I haven't received an email response from [3], you had indicated they would contact me in 1 week(see above), any info is appreciated, thank you-- Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 21:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Hey, could you take a look at [5]? Best, MrClog ( talk) 15:32, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
CRGreathouse, I apologize for what happened to your application. I drafted a note to you and intended to press the button "change status--under discussion", but instead hit the button "invalid." I have no idea what this new button is for, but I now know that once pressed, there is no recovery. The only thing you can do is to submit a new application. But I suggest you read the note I sent you to see if you want the subscription. AnthroMimus ( talk) 23:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I recently applied for the Taylor & Francis collection, but that's irrelevant. I saw that you were the one who handled T&F applications, so I took a look at your userpage. Needless to say, I agree with your stance on good articles, I find it absolutely ridiculous how many video games have good articles considering how insignificant they are. Sure, I do enjoy a bit of games here and there. But in comparison, only one Formula One car has good article status. Like, what? I know most of them are indeed not up to scratch, but I just find it just totally silly. Creedence Clearwood Revival doesn't even have GA status. Amazing. As for the other things mentioned on your talk page, I haven't really been here long enough to understand those. X-750 Rust In Peace... Polaris 22:28, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
I'm happy to see Taylor and Francis has joined the library bundle!
As for what I was looking for, see this Wikipedia Resource request as an example: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request/Archive_132#Mythic_Galveston_book_reviews. The journals carried by T&F do include reviews of academic books (which Wikipedia articles cite). By getting these book reviews I can write a Wikipedia article about the book itself. WhisperToMe ( talk) 01:30, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Mayima, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Jeff G. ツ 10:05, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Excellent work on the expansion of her article. I've removed the stub tag. And welcome to Wikipedia! Lugnuts ( talk) 17:46, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Gtwfan52 ( talk) 01:31, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
You recently disputed the neutrality of the article on the Sadler report giving the following reasons:
This whole article is not only argumentative, it is based exclusively on Austrian School Economic arguments and citesA . All of the "economic historians" are libertarian-Mises Institute types. There are no citations to historians of British political history at all. Moreover, it is not written like an encyclopedia article. It is shaped solely to agree with a certain view of political economyB C >. AnthroMimus ( talk) 13:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
(A) As a statement of fact, this has serious problems. When you posted that, the article gave 25 references, only four of which were in any way from the Austrian School or libertarian community; and those references were given to establish that there were critics of the report. Neither the presence of these gentlemen in the references nor the absence of other references to political historians establishes a non-neutral POV – can you point to any significant misrepresentation, misreporting or weasel words in the current text? (In any case what additional information/insight is a 21-st century historian supposed to be able to provide that Sadler’s contemporaries could not?)
(B) This would appear both to assume bad faith in others, and to presume to tell them what their politics are. Where I come from, that would be thought to be bad form verging on unbelievably rude
(C) You give no specific instance of non-neutrality needing to be addressed, beyond letting us know that you do not share the views on political economy of some of the references. Those views are not promoted in the article; they are not even mentioned.
There are two separate issues; the desirability of state intervention in man-master relationships, and the accuracy of the evidence Sadler adduced in favour of such intervention. One does not have to be opposed to the ‘big state’ to think Sadler’s report unreliable. It is possible to believe that
But it is also possible to believe that
Since Mr Sadler, his committee and the progress of factory legislation in pre-Victorian England seem to be at some remove from subjects on which you have previously contributed, and it is not immediately apparent that you have fully digested the body of the article, the following précis (more opinionated/argumentative than the article) may help you:
The report is of a Select Committee of the British House of Commons, to the House as whole, and was in support of legislation restricting the working hours of young children. The House debated the report and effectively took view (4) . In setting up a Factory Commission to investigate the same topic it rejected the report (and the evidence given to the Committee) as unreliable. It did so not because it did not believe the state should interfere in such matters (it went on to pass the 1833 Factory Act, which not only intervened in principle, but took care to establish a mechanism by which the state could intervene effectively in practice) but because it believed (from strong circumstantial evidence) that Sadler had been pulling a fast one, and could not be sure that some of his witnesses were not spinning a yarn. Explicit rejection of a Select Committee Report is unusual, and fairly damning. After the Factory Commission's report , Sadler's report came to be seen by his contemporaries as a 'dodgy dossier' (see quote from Gaskell in the article, or chase up Engels’ views as given in ‘The Condition of the Working Class in England’)
When subsequent generations started giving more credence to Sadler's report, Hutt et al had a greater incentive to counter this (by pointing out the contemporary objections) than those in sympathy with factory legislation; but the fact that it was Hutt who re-voiced those objections does not justify tarring others pointing them out (or those who originally voiced them) with the same brush. (One might as well say that since Hitler was in favour of building motorways any argument for building more motorways is ‘shaped to agree’ with National Socialism)
If you were 'shooting from the hip', then I suggest you remove your POV sticker ; if you wish to keep it posted, I would ask you to supply fresh grounds and or better arguments. Regards Rjccumbria ( talk) 20:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:NYTimes Saturday Night Massacre Front Page.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. The bot DID NOT tag your file(s) for deletion, so if you would like to know who tagged the file(s), please refer to the edit history of each individual file. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:05, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
HazelAB ( talk) 17:05, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi AnthroMimus,
You should have access to Newspapers.com now. I think it's okay to leave the citations you have linking to articles at fultonhistory.com. However, the site's FAQ does include the following: "Q. Can I put a link on my site to yours? A. Yes. But PLEASE, use ONLY www.fultonhistory.com / Other pages and links change as updates occur." So that might mean some of your links might be lost at some point. (Quite a website, by the way - I'm glad to know about it!)
I think you'll like Newspapers.com and its clipping feature, which lets you clip and link to individual stories you have cited. All the information about clipping is on the Wikipedia:Newspapers.com site. Note that our free accounts through the Wikipedia Library don't include "publisher extra" content. All the best, HazelAB ( talk) 15:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hey AnthroMimus, I noticed your work on this article. Great additions! However, I also noticed that you haven't edited that article in a week. Is it okay if I remove the {{ under construction}} template and clean up the article a little? Regards, epicgenius, presented by reddit.com/r/funny ( talk) 01:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thank you for making the page "Squanto" a good deal better! I award you the Barnstar of Diligence. Hdjensofjfnen ( U T C) 03:21, 6 December 2016 (UTC) |
Hello, I applied for a Wikipedia:Taylor & Francis account awhile back ago. I never heard anything back about it despite Wikipedia:Taylor & Francis/Approved saying I was approved.-- KAVEBEAR ( talk) 22:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and resubmitted another request via the new means. Thanks.-- KAVEBEAR ( talk) 07:20, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hobbamock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephen Hopkins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
-- Cameron11598 (Talk) 04:10, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi AnthroMimus, How are you? I was told your the T&L admin. I need some extra articles from T&L that I can't get access to. What is the mechanism to get hold of them, if it is available?. I was assigned a T&L account on the defense and strategy folder I think, and thought it would have covered what I was looking for. Unfortunately not. Is there any mechanism available to get hold of them. I think the problem lies in the fact T&L organizes it's articles within verticals, whereas here, by the nature of WP editing culture, it is horizontal. scope_creep ( talk) 14:54, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
The journals I'm looking to get access to are Cryptologia, International Journal of Intelligence and Counter Intelligence and Intelligence and National Security. Only for these article. Fundamentally what I've been working on and currently working. Thanks for the quick response. scope_creep ( talk) 21:42, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
@ Scope creep: Have you heard from T&F yet? AnthroMimus ( talk) 04:36, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Reply Back------------------------------------
Mr. Watson,
I have electronic access to all the Taylor & Francis journals through the library of Saint Mary's College of California where I used to work (I am now retired). Normally, this connection allows me full access to articles in the International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, but for some reason that access is denied for the volume (No. 9) that contains my article on Pers Z.
I searched my electronic files, but cannot locate the manuscript version of the article as submitted to the journal way back when. When I retired and relocated to a small village in northern New Mexico, I significantly down-sized my life, including the electronic side of that life, and the electronic manuscript of "Diplomatic Solutions" may have been a casualty of the process.
I will see if I still have a hard copy of the journal and if I do I will scan the article and email it to you.
Thank you for your interest in my past work. There can't be more than a dozen people in the world who know--let alone care--about PersZ.
David
My email.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Bob Watson <xxxxx@hotmail.com> wrote: Dear Professor David Alvarez Let me introduce myself. My name is Bob Watson, and I’m an editor on Wikipedia with the username of scope_creep. I am currently trying to find an article on the AA/Pers Z S organization, which I hope you know was the diplomatic signal intelligence organization for the German Foreign Office from 1919 to the end of World War 2. The article can be found at: /info/en/?search=Pers_Z_S
The article as it stands is full of facts, using released WW2 TICOM documentation, but doesn’t contain any critical analysis, which it really needs. I found out that Wikipedia was creating strategic partnerships with certain types of archives, like NARA, Oxford University Press and a bunch of others. I spotted one, which was Taylor and Francis, and signed up, got a bunch of articles, which I used as sources for missing information in other articles, like Wilhelm Fenner, and B-Dienst.
I need a T&L article to help provide that critical analysis which is at the following url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08850609608435314
Under the agreement with them, I specified Defence category and the International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence unfortunately wasn’t in it. They have promised to fix it and so far no luck. I can tell you, I’m champing at the bit for the article. Would it be possible to get it off yourself.
19:35, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
Great job on starting your first article from scratch: Maryam Shahriar. It so awesome that you are covering non-Western Women and their work in the film community: works to combat the WP:BIAS that you describe on your user page! Keep up the great work. Sadads ( talk) 01:21, 9 May 2017 (UTC) |
Hi AnthroMimus, How goes it? Any word back from T & L? scope_creep ( talk) 10:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
I have not heard anything from T&F either. - PKM ( talk) 18:49, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
@ Scope creep: and @ PKM: Good news, sorta, I guess. It seems that Wikipedia's contact at T&F is no longer there and no replacement has been made. "We're working on it," as they say, and I'll keep you posted. AnthroMimus ( talk) 13:52, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
@ Scope creep: @ PKM: @ K.e.coffman: There are probably others who are affected by this but since the platform does not make it easy for anyone to communicate with editors (or even track down who they are) once they are sent on to the "partners" I'll address you three who I know about here, so that any questions, comments, updates can be in one place. The short answer is I simply cannot get T&F to respond to me. The publisher and an editor have for a week both had my email alerting them that they have not approved editors for 1-1/2 months and that I haven't had my emails answered. They have acted in like manner: They do not response to my emails. I have conducted the highest "official" I know at Wikimedia (he has to be high since he is a paid consultant) and am awaiting suggestions. I really do not know whether and if so when T&F intends to continue the "partnership." AnthroMimus ( talk) 17:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
@ Scope creep: You should be hearing shortly from Geraldine Richards, an Editorial Assistant, Routledge US Arts & Humanities Journals Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. She has the list of the 10 articles you flagged and is looking into it (or at least she is going to deal with you directly). AnthroMimus ( talk) 19:19, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
As it happens, publication of the journal Costume (and its back issues) has moved from Taylor & Francis to the University of Edinburgh. That was my main motivation for getting access to T&F, so if it never happens now I won't be terribly disappointed. I really appreciate your efforts so far, but don't spend any more energy on this on my behalf. - PKM ( talk) 19:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
A changeover in personnel has seemed to have caused confusion at T&F about who is supposed to have access via the Wikipedia Library Platform. In the hopes of ensuring everyone who was approved gets access I want to make a list here so I can advise T&F who is waiting for access. Please let me know if you have been granted access and if possible when (or how long you estimate it was after you application was sent until you got access). If you do not have access now, but receive it in the near future, can you also update your response and let me know when you got access? Many thanks (I am going to bild this list from most recent to oldest approvals). AnthroMimus ( talk) 21:34, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, AnthroMimus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi AnthroMimus. My request for access to Taylor & Francis through TWL was just closed as "Not approved". Is there any particular reason why? -- Xover ( talk) 05:09, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Horst Dassler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Hall ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:00, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Alessandro, Signor of Ottajano. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please, assume good faith when addressing other editors. I also noticed your behavior towards User:Accesscrawl in article Saki. We are here with one goal and we are all here need to be polite towards each other. Arthistorian1977 ( talk) 10:37, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
I replied on my open library application - basically if Arts & Humanities isn't available would you be able to sign me up for Strategic, Defence & Security Studies? Seraphim System ( talk) 18:06, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, AnthroMimus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, AnthroMimus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
you access this book? Regards, ∯WBG converse 17:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi AM. Referring to this message; [1] any update? :-) - LouisAragon ( talk) 00:59, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi AnthroMimus, I have started a discussion over our Village pump with the aim of maintaining a public list of all editors who are granted access to any TWL resource. Your thoughts and opinions on the proposal are welcome:-) Regards, ∯WBG converse
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Village Voice Film Poll, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Miller and Carlos ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:17, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
hi, I was wondering about [2] I have'nt received any email from them?-- Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 20:11, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I haven't received an email response from [3], you had indicated they would contact me in 1 week(see above), any info is appreciated, thank you-- Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 21:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Hey, could you take a look at [5]? Best, MrClog ( talk) 15:32, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
CRGreathouse, I apologize for what happened to your application. I drafted a note to you and intended to press the button "change status--under discussion", but instead hit the button "invalid." I have no idea what this new button is for, but I now know that once pressed, there is no recovery. The only thing you can do is to submit a new application. But I suggest you read the note I sent you to see if you want the subscription. AnthroMimus ( talk) 23:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I recently applied for the Taylor & Francis collection, but that's irrelevant. I saw that you were the one who handled T&F applications, so I took a look at your userpage. Needless to say, I agree with your stance on good articles, I find it absolutely ridiculous how many video games have good articles considering how insignificant they are. Sure, I do enjoy a bit of games here and there. But in comparison, only one Formula One car has good article status. Like, what? I know most of them are indeed not up to scratch, but I just find it just totally silly. Creedence Clearwood Revival doesn't even have GA status. Amazing. As for the other things mentioned on your talk page, I haven't really been here long enough to understand those. X-750 Rust In Peace... Polaris 22:28, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
I'm happy to see Taylor and Francis has joined the library bundle!
As for what I was looking for, see this Wikipedia Resource request as an example: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request/Archive_132#Mythic_Galveston_book_reviews. The journals carried by T&F do include reviews of academic books (which Wikipedia articles cite). By getting these book reviews I can write a Wikipedia article about the book itself. WhisperToMe ( talk) 01:30, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Mayima, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Jeff G. ツ 10:05, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)