2007: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
Category:Japanese priestesses has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:16th-century Polish farmers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 02:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:17th-century Polish farmers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 02:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello Aciram!
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
I really don't understand why you keep adding unsourced categories. You know as well I do that categories are not only supposed to be sourced, but they also need to be defining. The category that you added and reinstated to Ali Bitchin makes no sense. M.Bitton ( talk) 00:41, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Category:10th-century women rulers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[ Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 August 31#Category:10th-century women rulers]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NLeeuw ( talk) 23:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Category:9th-century women rulers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[ Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 August 31#Category:9th-century women rulers]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NLeeuw ( talk) 23:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:17th-century Danish women farmers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 00:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:18th-century Danish women farmers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 00:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
See this thread. Thanks, TrangaBellam ( talk) 21:41, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isabel de la Cruz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk) 19:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:21st-century Andorran people by occupation has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 05:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Royal Consort Jo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of individual notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
toobigtokale (
talk) 06:58, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, for
Royal Consort Jo, you left an edit comment that reads you have to provide a link to a discussion so people can raise their objections, and you did not; correct the template.
However the point of
WP:PRODs is that there isn't a discussion; in other words there's no option to add a discussion to the PROD. You're thinking of
WP:AFD. I'm not going to pursue an AFD, but just wanted to let you know for future reference.
toobigtokale (
talk) 16:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:19th-century American slave owners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 03:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:18th-century American slave owners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 03:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Haratin. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton ( talk) 15:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:Slave owners by century has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 19:47, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:21st-century Andorran people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 16:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Mikeblas ( talk) 16:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:20th-century Andorran people by occupation has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 00:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Slavery in the Mongol Empire indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 03:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Aciram. Thank you for your work on Slave trade in the Mongol Empire. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
@ Aciram,
After your previous message at my talk page I watch listed the article but could not study the issue closely being busy in reading papers on google scholar.
Just now I came to your talk page following some random category and went through your talk page a little.
I happen to divide Wikipedians in two broad types those who are encyclopedic content writers and those who are in curation / maintenance few do both tasks. Encyclopedic content writing needs exceptional skill and hence encyclopedic content writers are very few compared to curators. You do have encyclopedic content writing skill.
Many times writing one content sentence with reference takes hours of search and study referencing and defending that sentence after that is a huge task itself.
In my new articles I create a section of suggested categories and leave it to copy editors which categories to keep and which not to. In existent articles I make category request at article talk page and leave it at that. Very rarely I request a category at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Categories.
This is not to judge your category work on it's merit nor this is an advice for others to use against you or to compel you to stay away from categories involvement.
Still, like me, I feel you also preferably leave curation tasks like populating categories to curators. And see if you can enjoy sigh of relief and have lesser stress.
I have some other article expansion requests, for that I shall come back to you in couple of days. Happy editing. Bookku ( talk) 05:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
2007: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2008: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2010: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
Category:Japanese priestesses has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle ( talk) 21:29, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:16th-century Polish farmers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 02:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:17th-century Polish farmers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 02:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello Aciram!
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
I really don't understand why you keep adding unsourced categories. You know as well I do that categories are not only supposed to be sourced, but they also need to be defining. The category that you added and reinstated to Ali Bitchin makes no sense. M.Bitton ( talk) 00:41, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Category:10th-century women rulers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[ Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 August 31#Category:10th-century women rulers]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NLeeuw ( talk) 23:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Category:9th-century women rulers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[ Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 August 31#Category:9th-century women rulers]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NLeeuw ( talk) 23:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:17th-century Danish women farmers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 00:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:18th-century Danish women farmers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 00:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
See this thread. Thanks, TrangaBellam ( talk) 21:41, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isabel de la Cruz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.BlakeIsHereStudios ( talk) 19:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:21st-century Andorran people by occupation has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 05:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
The article Royal Consort Jo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of individual notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
toobigtokale (
talk) 06:58, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, for
Royal Consort Jo, you left an edit comment that reads you have to provide a link to a discussion so people can raise their objections, and you did not; correct the template.
However the point of
WP:PRODs is that there isn't a discussion; in other words there's no option to add a discussion to the PROD. You're thinking of
WP:AFD. I'm not going to pursue an AFD, but just wanted to let you know for future reference.
toobigtokale (
talk) 16:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:19th-century American slave owners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 03:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:18th-century American slave owners has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 03:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Haratin. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton ( talk) 15:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:Slave owners by century has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 19:47, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:21st-century Andorran people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 16:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Mikeblas ( talk) 16:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Category:20th-century Andorran people by occupation has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason ( talk) 00:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Slavery in the Mongol Empire indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 03:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi Aciram. Thank you for your work on Slave trade in the Mongol Empire. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
@ Aciram,
After your previous message at my talk page I watch listed the article but could not study the issue closely being busy in reading papers on google scholar.
Just now I came to your talk page following some random category and went through your talk page a little.
I happen to divide Wikipedians in two broad types those who are encyclopedic content writers and those who are in curation / maintenance few do both tasks. Encyclopedic content writing needs exceptional skill and hence encyclopedic content writers are very few compared to curators. You do have encyclopedic content writing skill.
Many times writing one content sentence with reference takes hours of search and study referencing and defending that sentence after that is a huge task itself.
In my new articles I create a section of suggested categories and leave it to copy editors which categories to keep and which not to. In existent articles I make category request at article talk page and leave it at that. Very rarely I request a category at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Categories.
This is not to judge your category work on it's merit nor this is an advice for others to use against you or to compel you to stay away from categories involvement.
Still, like me, I feel you also preferably leave curation tasks like populating categories to curators. And see if you can enjoy sigh of relief and have lesser stress.
I have some other article expansion requests, for that I shall come back to you in couple of days. Happy editing. Bookku ( talk) 05:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)