This is a Wikipedia user talkpage.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs (and the users whose comments appear on it) may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. You can leave me a message here. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:A._B./November_2006. |
Hi A.B., re your comment on the talk page, FYI, the normal practise if you agree with the prod is to use {{ prod-2}}. This helps administrators who ultimately have to decide whether to delete the article, know that at least two people concur. I hope I'm not teaching you to suck eggs or that there may have been another reason you didn't. Regards — Moondyne 02:33, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello A.B. I need some help dealing with wiki and I am unsure how to proceed, but reading your comments you seem to be a sympathetic type. Could I ask you some questions CONFIDENTIALLY? Anonypig, new Wiki member. -- Anonypig 17:36, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you A.B, I will follow your advice. Anonypig
Thank you for your support in
my RfA, which passed with a final tally of (56/0/2). It was great to see so much kind support from such competent editors and administrators as commented on my RfA.
I know I have much reading to do before I'll feel comfortable enough to use some of the more powerful admin tools, so I'll get right to it. |
Thanks for your comments on my page. I understand what you are saying, but I'd just like to make it clear that I was not vandalising or putting unfair POV- I will try to find a citation to back up what I said.
Plooft
...for your support of my recent RfA. I know that you are very careful with your support votes, and I am honored that you would consider me worthy of the mop. If I can be of any helo with my new tools or just as a pair of disinterested eyes to review an article, do not hesitate to ask. Cheers. youngamerican ( ahoy hoy) 18:58, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi AB. Please find discussion opened on the source of the reference I used on the discussion page of Mobile Phone. Thanks AntB
(Shouldn't that be anti-spamstar? :-) Thanks for the barnstar A.B.!
The Spamstar of Glory | ||
Presented to User:A. B. for diligence in fighting spam on Wikipedia |
Obviously, if you give them, you need to receive one, as you are one of the most active in WikiProject Spam. Cheers! -- ReyBrujo 19:25, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
he he he... spamstar of glory... is that a new barnstar? I don't think I'd ever seen it around. I also see that I arrived too late to give one back! Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 20:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Thats a great star and thanks for giving me one. It means a lot. — Moondyne 22:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
And thanks from me too. I appreciate it. I actually do not look for spam, but when it is put on one of my watched articles, I can't help but follow the trail. JonHarder 23:19, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Many thanks from me as well, that's very kind of you! Sorry to hear you're away from Wikipedia for a while - Wikipedia will surely be hurting until you return. Hope you come back refreshed and ready for action. Cheers -- AbsolutDan (talk) 02:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
A. B., thank you for your support in my RfA. In the end, it may have made all the difference. I know when I look at such things, that someone put the effort in to do their own research, and then actually changed their mind based on it, that means a lot more than supporting or opposing without explaining what made them make up their thoughts. I suspect it is the same for many others. I am proud that after looking at the complex situation you do believe I am worthy of the mop. Since we haven't really interacted much at all before, that makes the effort and opinion even more valuable.
As you may gather, my Request for Adminship is over, and successfully, not least due to your research and support. I hope to make it have been worth while. If there is any admin thing I can do to make your life easier, please ask, and I will do as best I can.
Otherwise, I will try to start the admin thing slowly, and not delete the Main Page for at least five minutes. If I mess up, make sure to come to my talk page and give me a good yell. Email also works, and is more private, but talk page will often get a more immediate response. If even that doesn't work, I am, of course, in Category:Administrators open to recall, though I would hope you give the yell route a try first. AnonEMouse (squeak) 23:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Design from User:Phaedriel/Rfa thanks, which amazed me when I got it. GFDL.
Regarding your reverting of sourced material. And then claiming it to be ussual claim.
I have now added source, which is from faily express UK, written by kathy moran, and that is a reliable source. Editing with IP or not, in the future i will look to see if that fact, which is very important still stands there, and thank you for your concern of citing sources to the material in wiki. -- 213.113.243.140 16:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi A.B. I wanted to thank you with flowers (well, flower) taking the time to participate in my RfA, which was successful. I'm very grateful for your kind words in support, and especially for your insightful comment in response to the opposes on ethical grounds. I truly appreciate that. I assure you I'll continue to serve the goals of the project to the best of my ability - irrespective of my personal opinion - and strive to use the tools wisely and fairly. Please do let me know if I can be of assistance and especially if you spot me making an error in future. Many thanks once again and I look forward to working with you on your return for your Wikibreak. Yours, Rockpocke t 08:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
Hi A.B. Thanks for the supporting messages on my discussion page. My first page Universal Powerline Association. I am concerned because eliminating this page and not eliminating the alternative page for HomePlug would cause a NPOV problem. I am mystified. Can you advise how to move forward?-- Upaplc 10:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the time to look in to this -- Upaplc 15:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC) I noticed your , and I just wanted to point out that the edit refers to the Operation section of this article and not the article in general. I just thought that this bit of the article was rather techy... no offense intended. In any case I am following the guideline you pasted on my talk page now and staying hands off.-- Upaplc 15:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
My RfA done I appreciate Anyway, I just |
EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Noted and actioned! Cheers. — Moondyne 00:23, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Glad to hear you've been working on the Appalachia page! It's one I've long wanted to see improved, but felt it needed more than just copyediting but some larger structural reworking; thus I never got around to doing anything with it myself. Plus it is a large and sometimes complex topic, and I don't quite feel I understand the region well enough, though I'm getting a better handle on its geography and early history at least. I haven't looked at your edits closely yet, but will when I get the time, and perhaps try my hand at improving the page too. Just wanted to first say thanks for working on it! Pfly 05:13, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi A.B. You wrote: "With the Caudill article, I was concerned about NPOV and general structure -- I just haven't seen amazon-style discussions in other authors' articles. Maybe the WikiProject Books folks might have some ideas on this -- I left a note there."
Without disagreement, it's often difficult to critically analyze anything, especially in an atmosphere where groupthinkconsensus is the highest goal. I certainly bear no one any malice. Your anti-vandalism messages page is far funnier than I am, and I may try to think up a box or two. Happy editing, --
Elaragirl ||||||
Talk|
Count 00:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks! | |
---|---|
Thanks for your input on my (nearly recent) Request for adminship, which regretfully achived no consensus, with votes of 68/28/2. I am grateful for the input received, both positive and in opposition, and I'd like to thank you for your participation. | |
Georgewilliamherbert 05:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC) |
What do you consider spam? I think those links in LAN gaming center are informative, also dmoz is completely unreliable. Freakdomination 04:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
A.B.: Since I agree with your observations that "content contributors are the most valuable members" of Wikipedia and we should take pains to help newcomers who are trying to submit content, I wanted to make you aware that an addition by 74.106.186.175 that you reverted may have been legitimate, even though it was only supported by a link to a spamdexing/Adsense site. Please see my discussion on the Appalachain Mountains Talk Page. Tlmclain | Talk 18:50, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Aha - the plot thickens. It does appear that he may be promoting Adsense blogs instead of adding content it good faith. I guess we'll see what happens next. Between my post on the Appalachain Mountains Talk Page and his talk page, he now knows how to post and document the content properly. If he continues to post links to blogs, then we'll know. Tlmclain | Talk 21:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
A week ago I nominated myself, hoping to be able to help Wikipedia as an administrator as much as a WikiGnome. I am very glad many others shared my thoughts, including you. Thank you for your trust! Be sure I will use these tools to protect and prevent and not to harass or punish. Should you feel I am overreacting, pat me so that I can correct myself. I will continue my work trying to free Wikipedia from spammers and copyright violators as I did as a wikignome. If anything, I hope these tools will allow me to be slightly more effective when dealing with them, always trying to be as just and neutral as possible. Thanks again! ReyBrujo 20:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC) |
Hey, Thanks for letting me know - I put a comment on the deletion review page. Its funny, I really thought you had the wrong person when you implied that I created that page, but you were right. I had just completely forgotton about it. Fresheneesz 01:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
The Working Man's Barnstar | ||
For your ongoing willingness to take on the laborious tasks involved in fighting spam, and for being a driving force at WikiProject Spam, I award you the Working Man's Barnstar. Keep up the excellent work! -- AbsolutDan (talk) 17:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC) |
I saw on your comment on my talk page that you read my blogpost :). I can get very annoyed by edits which screw up articles, solely on the basis of wanting to remove spam... I could provide a readinglist, but i think it would be wiser to be more prudent in editing whole articles, and start with removing the linkspam of the external link section of a great lot of those pages... It seems Wikipedia need some SEO's that are white, don't need to spam, and yet write good articles about SEO on wikipedia. IMHO, Jaimie Sirovich did just that... -- Jdevalk 13:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Your thoughts on those blogs would be appreciated, since the SEO world mainly talks through blogs. I've been going around some of the SEO articles, and could edit even "harder" but I wouldn't want to do that without some backup and regular checks, since these are such sensitive sections... -- Jdevalk 17:05, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
A.B.,
If you read the discussion carefully, I have agreed not to add a link to the website I run any longer since I recognize it is a violation of conflict of interest rules. Back off. "It's your call." (A.B.) I don't think threats are a part of a good Wikipedia community? Analyzethis 16:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
I reported 195.194.74.26 ( talk · contribs) at WP:AIV for continuing to vandalize after still another last warning earlier this week. Since I have found it so hard to get vandals blocked even when they meet all the criteria listed on the WP:AIV page, I went ahead and gave him another "last warning". You then declined to block this vandal with the comment "1 already warned. LIST MT". I have reverted my warning -- can you go ahead and block this person. They will be back again tomorrow, and the day after that and the day after that ad inifitium. It would be nice to get a break of at least a few days from cleaning up after them. -- A. B. 16:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
So, are you actually taking a break, or just harassing other users? Analyzethis 18:15, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Hmm, did you see what just happened with some of the IPs that attacked us yesterday? They were blocked as open proxies. Quite interesting, Metros232 15:38, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Jahiegel, if he ever agrees to run. Amalas as well. My RfA batting average so far is 1.000. Hope it stays this way after Kafziel is done. - crz crztalk 23:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
A.B.: This is a copy of my reply to your post on my own talk page — feel free to delete it here after you've seen it. Athænara ✉ 01:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
For what it's worth, that's one of the most thoughtful,insightful, well-written AfD comments I've read in a long time. -- A. B. 23:12, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
I've semi protected your user and user talk pages. Let me know if you want me to lift this or not. Metros232 06:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
A longstanding problem. There's been two arbitrations. Please ask sysop Bucketsofg. He's current in all these Canadian politics... Thx - crz crztalk 14:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
I am happy to help clean up but I've tried four or five places in your list and all seem to have been done? I have some time about 1400UTC so tell me if you still need help -- BozMo talk 09:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks for your support, your email, and your encouragement after the close. It's good to meet you, and I'd be happy to help out at Wikiproject: Spam. It's a great idea. Kafziel Talk 15:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for trying to find cases of vote-stacking, but I am sorry to say that, though I am a friend of YouTrue, who happens to be on vacation with me on the same island we came to our concurrent opinion for other reasons. Should have asked me -- Rough 00:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I like your welcome template the best of all the welcome templates. I use it all the time -- thanks for writing it. -- A. B. 13:15, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
haz ( talk) e has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{ subst:smile}}, {{ subst:smile2}} or {{ subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
This is a Wikipedia user talkpage.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs (and the users whose comments appear on it) may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. You can leave me a message here. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:A._B./November_2006. |
Hi A.B., re your comment on the talk page, FYI, the normal practise if you agree with the prod is to use {{ prod-2}}. This helps administrators who ultimately have to decide whether to delete the article, know that at least two people concur. I hope I'm not teaching you to suck eggs or that there may have been another reason you didn't. Regards — Moondyne 02:33, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello A.B. I need some help dealing with wiki and I am unsure how to proceed, but reading your comments you seem to be a sympathetic type. Could I ask you some questions CONFIDENTIALLY? Anonypig, new Wiki member. -- Anonypig 17:36, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Thank you A.B, I will follow your advice. Anonypig
Thank you for your support in
my RfA, which passed with a final tally of (56/0/2). It was great to see so much kind support from such competent editors and administrators as commented on my RfA.
I know I have much reading to do before I'll feel comfortable enough to use some of the more powerful admin tools, so I'll get right to it. |
Thanks for your comments on my page. I understand what you are saying, but I'd just like to make it clear that I was not vandalising or putting unfair POV- I will try to find a citation to back up what I said.
Plooft
...for your support of my recent RfA. I know that you are very careful with your support votes, and I am honored that you would consider me worthy of the mop. If I can be of any helo with my new tools or just as a pair of disinterested eyes to review an article, do not hesitate to ask. Cheers. youngamerican ( ahoy hoy) 18:58, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi AB. Please find discussion opened on the source of the reference I used on the discussion page of Mobile Phone. Thanks AntB
(Shouldn't that be anti-spamstar? :-) Thanks for the barnstar A.B.!
The Spamstar of Glory | ||
Presented to User:A. B. for diligence in fighting spam on Wikipedia |
Obviously, if you give them, you need to receive one, as you are one of the most active in WikiProject Spam. Cheers! -- ReyBrujo 19:25, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
he he he... spamstar of glory... is that a new barnstar? I don't think I'd ever seen it around. I also see that I arrived too late to give one back! Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 20:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Thats a great star and thanks for giving me one. It means a lot. — Moondyne 22:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
And thanks from me too. I appreciate it. I actually do not look for spam, but when it is put on one of my watched articles, I can't help but follow the trail. JonHarder 23:19, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Many thanks from me as well, that's very kind of you! Sorry to hear you're away from Wikipedia for a while - Wikipedia will surely be hurting until you return. Hope you come back refreshed and ready for action. Cheers -- AbsolutDan (talk) 02:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
A. B., thank you for your support in my RfA. In the end, it may have made all the difference. I know when I look at such things, that someone put the effort in to do their own research, and then actually changed their mind based on it, that means a lot more than supporting or opposing without explaining what made them make up their thoughts. I suspect it is the same for many others. I am proud that after looking at the complex situation you do believe I am worthy of the mop. Since we haven't really interacted much at all before, that makes the effort and opinion even more valuable.
As you may gather, my Request for Adminship is over, and successfully, not least due to your research and support. I hope to make it have been worth while. If there is any admin thing I can do to make your life easier, please ask, and I will do as best I can.
Otherwise, I will try to start the admin thing slowly, and not delete the Main Page for at least five minutes. If I mess up, make sure to come to my talk page and give me a good yell. Email also works, and is more private, but talk page will often get a more immediate response. If even that doesn't work, I am, of course, in Category:Administrators open to recall, though I would hope you give the yell route a try first. AnonEMouse (squeak) 23:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Design from User:Phaedriel/Rfa thanks, which amazed me when I got it. GFDL.
Regarding your reverting of sourced material. And then claiming it to be ussual claim.
I have now added source, which is from faily express UK, written by kathy moran, and that is a reliable source. Editing with IP or not, in the future i will look to see if that fact, which is very important still stands there, and thank you for your concern of citing sources to the material in wiki. -- 213.113.243.140 16:57, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi A.B. I wanted to thank you with flowers (well, flower) taking the time to participate in my RfA, which was successful. I'm very grateful for your kind words in support, and especially for your insightful comment in response to the opposes on ethical grounds. I truly appreciate that. I assure you I'll continue to serve the goals of the project to the best of my ability - irrespective of my personal opinion - and strive to use the tools wisely and fairly. Please do let me know if I can be of assistance and especially if you spot me making an error in future. Many thanks once again and I look forward to working with you on your return for your Wikibreak. Yours, Rockpocke t 08:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC) |
Hi A.B. Thanks for the supporting messages on my discussion page. My first page Universal Powerline Association. I am concerned because eliminating this page and not eliminating the alternative page for HomePlug would cause a NPOV problem. I am mystified. Can you advise how to move forward?-- Upaplc 10:36, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the time to look in to this -- Upaplc 15:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC) I noticed your , and I just wanted to point out that the edit refers to the Operation section of this article and not the article in general. I just thought that this bit of the article was rather techy... no offense intended. In any case I am following the guideline you pasted on my talk page now and staying hands off.-- Upaplc 15:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
My RfA done I appreciate Anyway, I just |
EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Noted and actioned! Cheers. — Moondyne 00:23, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Glad to hear you've been working on the Appalachia page! It's one I've long wanted to see improved, but felt it needed more than just copyediting but some larger structural reworking; thus I never got around to doing anything with it myself. Plus it is a large and sometimes complex topic, and I don't quite feel I understand the region well enough, though I'm getting a better handle on its geography and early history at least. I haven't looked at your edits closely yet, but will when I get the time, and perhaps try my hand at improving the page too. Just wanted to first say thanks for working on it! Pfly 05:13, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi A.B. You wrote: "With the Caudill article, I was concerned about NPOV and general structure -- I just haven't seen amazon-style discussions in other authors' articles. Maybe the WikiProject Books folks might have some ideas on this -- I left a note there."
Without disagreement, it's often difficult to critically analyze anything, especially in an atmosphere where groupthinkconsensus is the highest goal. I certainly bear no one any malice. Your anti-vandalism messages page is far funnier than I am, and I may try to think up a box or two. Happy editing, --
Elaragirl ||||||
Talk|
Count 00:17, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks! | |
---|---|
Thanks for your input on my (nearly recent) Request for adminship, which regretfully achived no consensus, with votes of 68/28/2. I am grateful for the input received, both positive and in opposition, and I'd like to thank you for your participation. | |
Georgewilliamherbert 05:32, 16 November 2006 (UTC) |
What do you consider spam? I think those links in LAN gaming center are informative, also dmoz is completely unreliable. Freakdomination 04:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
A.B.: Since I agree with your observations that "content contributors are the most valuable members" of Wikipedia and we should take pains to help newcomers who are trying to submit content, I wanted to make you aware that an addition by 74.106.186.175 that you reverted may have been legitimate, even though it was only supported by a link to a spamdexing/Adsense site. Please see my discussion on the Appalachain Mountains Talk Page. Tlmclain | Talk 18:50, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Aha - the plot thickens. It does appear that he may be promoting Adsense blogs instead of adding content it good faith. I guess we'll see what happens next. Between my post on the Appalachain Mountains Talk Page and his talk page, he now knows how to post and document the content properly. If he continues to post links to blogs, then we'll know. Tlmclain | Talk 21:29, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
A week ago I nominated myself, hoping to be able to help Wikipedia as an administrator as much as a WikiGnome. I am very glad many others shared my thoughts, including you. Thank you for your trust! Be sure I will use these tools to protect and prevent and not to harass or punish. Should you feel I am overreacting, pat me so that I can correct myself. I will continue my work trying to free Wikipedia from spammers and copyright violators as I did as a wikignome. If anything, I hope these tools will allow me to be slightly more effective when dealing with them, always trying to be as just and neutral as possible. Thanks again! ReyBrujo 20:48, 18 November 2006 (UTC) |
Hey, Thanks for letting me know - I put a comment on the deletion review page. Its funny, I really thought you had the wrong person when you implied that I created that page, but you were right. I had just completely forgotton about it. Fresheneesz 01:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
The Working Man's Barnstar | ||
For your ongoing willingness to take on the laborious tasks involved in fighting spam, and for being a driving force at WikiProject Spam, I award you the Working Man's Barnstar. Keep up the excellent work! -- AbsolutDan (talk) 17:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC) |
I saw on your comment on my talk page that you read my blogpost :). I can get very annoyed by edits which screw up articles, solely on the basis of wanting to remove spam... I could provide a readinglist, but i think it would be wiser to be more prudent in editing whole articles, and start with removing the linkspam of the external link section of a great lot of those pages... It seems Wikipedia need some SEO's that are white, don't need to spam, and yet write good articles about SEO on wikipedia. IMHO, Jaimie Sirovich did just that... -- Jdevalk 13:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Your thoughts on those blogs would be appreciated, since the SEO world mainly talks through blogs. I've been going around some of the SEO articles, and could edit even "harder" but I wouldn't want to do that without some backup and regular checks, since these are such sensitive sections... -- Jdevalk 17:05, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
A.B.,
If you read the discussion carefully, I have agreed not to add a link to the website I run any longer since I recognize it is a violation of conflict of interest rules. Back off. "It's your call." (A.B.) I don't think threats are a part of a good Wikipedia community? Analyzethis 16:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
I reported 195.194.74.26 ( talk · contribs) at WP:AIV for continuing to vandalize after still another last warning earlier this week. Since I have found it so hard to get vandals blocked even when they meet all the criteria listed on the WP:AIV page, I went ahead and gave him another "last warning". You then declined to block this vandal with the comment "1 already warned. LIST MT". I have reverted my warning -- can you go ahead and block this person. They will be back again tomorrow, and the day after that and the day after that ad inifitium. It would be nice to get a break of at least a few days from cleaning up after them. -- A. B. 16:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
So, are you actually taking a break, or just harassing other users? Analyzethis 18:15, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Hmm, did you see what just happened with some of the IPs that attacked us yesterday? They were blocked as open proxies. Quite interesting, Metros232 15:38, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Jahiegel, if he ever agrees to run. Amalas as well. My RfA batting average so far is 1.000. Hope it stays this way after Kafziel is done. - crz crztalk 23:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
A.B.: This is a copy of my reply to your post on my own talk page — feel free to delete it here after you've seen it. Athænara ✉ 01:00, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
For what it's worth, that's one of the most thoughtful,insightful, well-written AfD comments I've read in a long time. -- A. B. 23:12, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
I've semi protected your user and user talk pages. Let me know if you want me to lift this or not. Metros232 06:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
A longstanding problem. There's been two arbitrations. Please ask sysop Bucketsofg. He's current in all these Canadian politics... Thx - crz crztalk 14:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
I am happy to help clean up but I've tried four or five places in your list and all seem to have been done? I have some time about 1400UTC so tell me if you still need help -- BozMo talk 09:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks for your support, your email, and your encouragement after the close. It's good to meet you, and I'd be happy to help out at Wikiproject: Spam. It's a great idea. Kafziel Talk 15:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for trying to find cases of vote-stacking, but I am sorry to say that, though I am a friend of YouTrue, who happens to be on vacation with me on the same island we came to our concurrent opinion for other reasons. Should have asked me -- Rough 00:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
I like your welcome template the best of all the welcome templates. I use it all the time -- thanks for writing it. -- A. B. 13:15, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
haz ( talk) e has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{ subst:smile}}, {{ subst:smile2}} or {{ subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!