Please do not add or change content, as you did at John F. A. Sanford, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 04:59, 2 March 2018 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at George B. McClellan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. RedUser ( talk) 11:32, 24 March 2018 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Reylo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas ( talk) 07:12, 9 April 2018 (UTC) reply

Ploutarkhos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas ( talk) 10:05, 21 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Tatum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark Tatum, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac ( talk) 10:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, 68.5.231.50! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac ( talk) 10:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Smmurphy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The previous declination suggested more references were necessary and the article was resubmitted without any new references. The Forbes reference is good. However, the other three are weak. I think the Cornell reference is ok, but it is borderline and many might not think it is sufficiently independent and subject to sufficient editorial oversight. The NBA.com reference is not independent. The Ozanian reference is good, but is not in-depth about the subject - it uses the an interview with the subject to talk about another topic. To me, one or two more references that are about Tatum would greatly improve the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mark Tatum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mark Tatum, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Smmurphy^{( Talk)} 14:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Please don't link WP:COMMONWORDS. I presume you are familiar with that word? Jim1138 ( talk) 06:54, 15 June 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to John Robichaux, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. • Gene93k ( talk) 01:26, 9 July 2018 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Samuel Barber. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Donner60 ( talk) 02:43, 22 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Striking message because source has now been added. Thanks! Donner60 ( talk) 03:03, 22 July 2018 (UTC) reply

You got it comrade. Thanks! Lol 68.5.231.50 ( talk) 03:25, 22 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Canyon Crest Academy ‎, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Meters ( talk) 02:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Savannah State Tigers football. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:52, 11 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Savannah State Tigers football, you may be blocked from editing. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:21, 11 September 2018 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hingle McCringleberry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hingle McCringleberry, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 00:09, 1 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has been tendentiously resubmitted.

An experienced draft reviewer has reviewed this draft and determined it is unsuitable for Wikipedia because it would likely be deleted if it were published to mainspace. Please read the comments left by reviewers in this draft. If you have questions, ask at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hingle McCringleberry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hingle McCringleberry, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bennv3771 was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Inca Emperors and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Inca Emperors, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bennv3771 ( talk) 03:34, 2 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks any sources or references

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nazistic Tendency and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nazistic Tendency, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt ( talk) 04:26, 2 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Chadwick School. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. John from Idegon ( talk) 02:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, 68.5.231.50. You have new messages at Alex Cohn's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mark Tatum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac ( talk) 07:30, 30 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your edit summary referring to the United Kingdom football article as it explains the change in wording. This nomenclature is not official and is quite unusual, as you know. One needs to know its history to see that the Rest of Europe is a similar reference. A brief addition to the Europe XI, perhaps even in a footnote, could make the use of the term more clear in that article. It appears I simply undid the edit and did not leave a warning template. If I had, I would now have struck it because the change appears to be correct; I cannot say whether it is preferred so I have no reason to revert the current version. Donner60 ( talk) 02:13, 5 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Please accept my apologies. My revert of your edit to Noh was accidental and was not meant for you. I see that you've just restored the edit I reverted; please forgive my screw-up. If you have questions or concerns, please feel free to let me know and I'll be happy to help you. My best regards - ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:45, 8 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi there! I'm just letting you know that I replied to the message you left on my user talk page. You can read it by clicking here. Best regards and happy editing to you - ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:52, 8 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Wilford Brimley has been reverted.
Your edit here to Wilford Brimley was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed ( https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/diabeetus) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! -- XLinkBot ( talk) 19:31, 11 November 2018 (UTC) reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Thank you for editing. I do believe that this description of "internet slang" which gives a wikilink that is very unlikely to be searched for in an encyclopedia is irrelevant, as further described here. Especially considering the case where the article is a redirect where not even the target article mentions anything and not even have its own entry in Wiktionary - it signifies that the slang itself is very non-notable. Therefore, I believe that there is no significance of including it in an encyclopedia, even in a small hatnote.
I have reverted your revert. Thank you for your understanding. Gaioa ( T C L) 11:55, 8 December 2018 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 06:34, 22 January 2019 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

68.5.231.50 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

What have I done wrong? I have simply been trying to enforce that the infobox naming on the elections are inconsistent and need to be fixed!

Decline reason:

I'm sorry. The trouble is your were WP:edit warring. Rather than continuing to futilely revert, you need to discuss changes are the article talk page(s). Even when you are right. If discussion goes nowhere, you can make a request for comment on the talk page(s) to seek consensus. Failing that, you should seek dispute resolution. You can be unblocked once you convey understanding of this and affirm you will cease from edit warring. -- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 07:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oh. That sounds all right, but maybe a warning could have helped me? I mean like this is a first-time offense for me (i.e. edit warring) 68.5.231.50 ( talk) 02:46, 23 January 2019 (UTC) reply

I finished nominating this for deletion. Aurornisxui ( talk) 16:20, 31 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Thanks! 68.5.231.50 ( talk) 23:59, 31 January 2019 (UTC) reply

( Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fyodor Dmitriev)

Hello, I'm S0091. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Barbara Mikulski, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. S0091 ( talk) 23:42, 23 February 2019 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi. Thanks for your contribution at Steven Adams. My revert was merely as a result of "New Zealand" being changed to "New Zealander" a number of times in the past (i.e. here and here) as well as the general consensus across Wikipedia being that "New Zealand" is the term used to describe someone from New Zealand (i.e. Brendon McCullum, Jonah Lomu, Dan Carter to name a few). I'm fine with leaving it as is for now, but what are your thoughts based on what I have provided here? Cheers. DaHuzyBru ( talk) 04:36, 6 March 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Creffett. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Wankard Pooser, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. creffett ( talk) 02:37, 7 May 2019 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mungo Jerry, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Egghead06 ( talk) 05:14, 12 May 2019 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jump in the Cadillac and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jump in the Cadillac, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 03:22, 14 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Edo State, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Donner60 ( talk) 03:15, 18 May 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! ― Susmuffin  ^Talk 23:47, 19 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! ― Susmuffin  ^Talk 22:18, 29 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Wgolf. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Wgolf ( talk) 18:20, 2 July 2019 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! ― Susmuffin  ^Talk 22:28, 18 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person ( Ronald Blair), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist ( talk) 09:42, 16 September 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Willsome429. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Atari Bigby have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Willsome429 ( say hey or see my edits!) 11:29, 1 October 2019 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jump in the Cadillac, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 23:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Alex Cohn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Aimo Koivunen—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Alex Cohn  (let's chat!) 03:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Wham2001. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Exit the King have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Wham2001 ( talk) 21:07, 20 April 2020 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wham2001 ( talk) 21:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.