From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Non-free image use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically 2016 Carolina Panthers season , may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi again IP 208.76.113.13. I see that someone using this account has once again added some uniform image files to the some 2016 NFL team articles. There are basically two types of images found in Wikipedia articles: freely licensed/ public domain images and non-free content images. The primary difference between the two has to do with their respective copyright status. The use of non-free images such as File:AFCN-Uniform-CIN.PNG and File:New Cleveland Browns uniforms 2015.png is restricted on Wikipedia because each of these images is considered to be under copyright protection. Each use of a non-free image has to satisfy all 10 of the non-free content criteria listed in WP:NFCCP and even failing one of these criteria means that the file will be removed. If you wish to use these uniform files in a particular article, you need to explain how the particular use satisfies these 10 criteria. If you have any questions on how to do this or whether this can be done, please ask for assistance at WP:MCQ. If you continue to inappropriately add non-free files to articles, it is eventually going to be seen a disruptive editing and a blatant violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy and will lead to an administrator being asked to intervene. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 01:45, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2016 Baltimore Ravens season has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 23:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2016 Oakland Raiders season. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 2016 Oakland Raiders season was changed by 208.76.113.13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880969 on 2016-10-19T23:37:10+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 23:37, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

June 2019

Information icon Hello, I'm Susmuffin. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Broly have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. ― Susmuffin  Talk 22:48, 10 June 2019 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

IP208, re your edit here, if "The diagram is a commendable effort" but has an error, had you not thought of correcting it and adding a new version at File:Constitution-usa-thomas-paine.png, and/or of contacting the creator User:Mathieugp? Thanks. Martinevans123 ( talk) 21:50, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply

I just reread the relevant passage of Common Sense and the number of "57" for the members of the Continental Conference is indeed wrong. "117" is the right number, that is: (13 * 2) + (13 * 2) + (13 * 5). For some reason, I had counted only "5" instead of "13 * 5". I will make the correction on the diagram and reintroduce it in the article after. Mathieugp ( talk) 21:58, 27 August 2022 (UTC) reply
It is done. :-) Mathieugp ( talk) 22:17, 27 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kate Stewart (politician) (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs) 10:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, 208.76.113.13! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs) 10:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC) reply

December 2023

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 22:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC) reply


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Non-free image use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically 2016 Carolina Panthers season , may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:26, 14 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi again IP 208.76.113.13. I see that someone using this account has once again added some uniform image files to the some 2016 NFL team articles. There are basically two types of images found in Wikipedia articles: freely licensed/ public domain images and non-free content images. The primary difference between the two has to do with their respective copyright status. The use of non-free images such as File:AFCN-Uniform-CIN.PNG and File:New Cleveland Browns uniforms 2015.png is restricted on Wikipedia because each of these images is considered to be under copyright protection. Each use of a non-free image has to satisfy all 10 of the non-free content criteria listed in WP:NFCCP and even failing one of these criteria means that the file will be removed. If you wish to use these uniform files in a particular article, you need to explain how the particular use satisfies these 10 criteria. If you have any questions on how to do this or whether this can be done, please ask for assistance at WP:MCQ. If you continue to inappropriately add non-free files to articles, it is eventually going to be seen a disruptive editing and a blatant violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy and will lead to an administrator being asked to intervene. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 01:45, 20 October 2016 (UTC) reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2016 Baltimore Ravens season has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 23:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2016 Oakland Raiders season. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 2016 Oakland Raiders season was changed by 208.76.113.13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880969 on 2016-10-19T23:37:10+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 23:37, 19 October 2016 (UTC) reply

June 2019

Information icon Hello, I'm Susmuffin. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Broly have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. ― Susmuffin  Talk 22:48, 10 June 2019 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

IP208, re your edit here, if "The diagram is a commendable effort" but has an error, had you not thought of correcting it and adding a new version at File:Constitution-usa-thomas-paine.png, and/or of contacting the creator User:Mathieugp? Thanks. Martinevans123 ( talk) 21:50, 8 July 2022 (UTC) reply

I just reread the relevant passage of Common Sense and the number of "57" for the members of the Continental Conference is indeed wrong. "117" is the right number, that is: (13 * 2) + (13 * 2) + (13 * 5). For some reason, I had counted only "5" instead of "13 * 5". I will make the correction on the diagram and reintroduce it in the article after. Mathieugp ( talk) 21:58, 27 August 2022 (UTC) reply
It is done. :-) Mathieugp ( talk) 22:17, 27 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kate Stewart (politician) (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs) 10:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC) reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, 208.76.113.13! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk | contribs) 10:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC) reply

December 2023

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Philipnelson99 ( talk) 22:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC) reply



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook