This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Consistent to my opinion regarding user:YellowMonkey, not editing isn't a manifestation of compliance or good editing, keep editing, Wikipedia has millions of articles, which you can contribute to within the limits of the ban. Yogesh Khandke ( talk) 17:39, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
This is to inform you that your request for arbitration has been declined.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee -- Alexandr Dmitri ( talk) 12:35, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
At the time of my ban, I was working on a template and an article on disputed treasures in British museums. Any takers to create the template and the article in the respective spaces? You will find the template in my User:Zuggernaut/Template:Disputed treasures subpage. The sources for the article are in another User:Zuggernaut/Disputed treasures subpage. Zuggernaut ( talk) 16:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
|}
asking politely to add a source is "bullying"?. This from someone who labels people who dont agree with him as "brown sahib" and "acting white"?. hmmm thats rich-- Sodabottle ( talk) 13:15, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I would be glad to add to such a topic like 'Hindu Symbolism' which is absent on Wikipedia. See this - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolism. ..असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर | असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म.. Humour Thisthat2011 09:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
i was wondering if you could help to have a readily usable form transcluded to this page! thanks. -- CarTick ( talk) 22:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for the award. Your GAs like Upanishads and Deshastha Brahmin are always a joy to read. Please let me know if you need constructive critism/peer review to improve your articles or if you and I can collaborate on an article creation/improvement to make it a DYK/GA. I always try all best for that (considering time-constraints - I am spending lesser hours on wikipedia due to real life and the trend does not seem to end soon), but in long ugly disputes and arguments, I may not be the best person to approach as I tend to stay away from them as much as possible. I have also replied on my talk concerning "Emic sources" discussion on my talk. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 07:13, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
What happened? No it wasn't my primary hand, it was my left hand. (You write English remarkably well.) The cast was taken off yesterday, though it is very stiff, and I now can use all eight fingers and both thumbs to type now, which is such a comfort. Yogesh Khandke ( talk) 12:13, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, i know it's dumb of me to give it so late, but i've got a suggestion for you. You could contribute to articles related to Hinduism in Southeast Asia, and the ancient Hindu and Buddhist empires there such as Majapahit, Champa, Sri Vijaya, Sailendra, etc. Joyson Noel Holla at me! 06:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
... for the image replacement on my user page. :) Best wishes to you, -- J N 466 00:58, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar! utcursch | talk 15:26, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Some possible problems relating to your edits were brought to my attention; and I wanted to re-iterate that the topic ban is broadly applied - which means you shouldn't be involved in any discussion relating to Indian history, even if not really commenting on Indian history (this relates to your comment on Dougweller's talk page). Whilst it could be argued not to be a direct topic ban violation, it is skirting the edge of it very closely and is best avoided - especially as the intent seems to be to join the discussion w/o technically violating the ban. With that said; the topic of encouraging new editors (that you raised) is an important wiki-wide one which is being discussed at the meta/foundation level - if you can find a place to discuss it that is not in a context related to your topic ban (and avoid bringing Indian history into any discussion) I am sure there is much you can contribute.
More concerning though is giving this barnstar, which is the sort of inappropriate inciting that led to the topic ban. Also the follow up comment, which is definitely over the line of your topic ban. Finally this edit is well over the line and directly discusses the topic of Indian history.
I've specifically decided not to issue a block for those comments because a) they are a few days back and b) you do seem to be making a reasonable effort (if begrudgingly) to operate within the limits of the topic ban. But you have to stop this kind of activity; in the future admins may not be so lenient with your actions. Treat the topic ban extremely conservatively, and if you think you might be verging on violating it, assume you are.
Please take this as a polite but stern warning about edits such as the ones above; avoid them in the future and you will be fine. Thanks. -- Errant ( chat!) 13:32, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
I have been asking you many times about the status of your ban. Z your ban was unnecessary. I have said enough on Errantx's page and ArbCom and on the pages of individual members. As far as I understand, your case was rejected from arbcom not because it didn't hold water but because, in their opinion, all avenues had not been exhausted, please see Errantx's comments, he emphasised that he merely implemented a decision, and if I remember right, he considered a review possible, and that it could be overturned??? I think you should be using all your energies to this issue. Certain articles are badly dealt with, by people who don't have expertise, this has been heard from the highest places, (Ms. Gardner). I suggest that you first work on your ban and then, towards adminship, you are one of the stronger emic editors. Yogesh Khandke ( talk) 14:50, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zuggernaut for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Sitush ( talk) 12:20, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Z,
Thanks for your response on my talk page. I do hope you are coming for the WikiConference in November where I hope to meet you in real life. AshLin ( talk) 15:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks Zuggernaut. Much appreciated! Veryhuman ( talk) 13:51, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Alternate suggestion as "Swami Rambhadracharya" Redtigerxyz Talk 17:22, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello mate.. the article which you have nominated as GA has failed because of multiple issues ,It's better if you go for peer review.after making possible corrections you can re-nominate the article thank you.. 16:04, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Template:Maharashtrian Bhakti saints has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Evil IP address ( talk) 15:43, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
MW ℳ 17:09, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
MW ℳ 15:19, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks a ton for appreciation! It's really encouraging for a newbie like me from my fellow Wikipedian! Cheers,
Ram ( talk • contribs) 17:15, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Qwyrxian ( talk) 03:45, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Zuggernaut! Wanted to remind that Jagadguru Rambhadracharya's GA review still needs to be completed, and all the issues raised like copyedit are fixed now, so can u review it now? :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 15:40, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
I will AGF and presume that your deletion of my reply on talk:MangoWong was accidental rather than intentional. I would appreciate if you would restore my comments immediately. JanetteDoe ( talk) 03:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, why do you change to the sfn template when there is an existing, working template in use? The latest example of this is at Kunbi. - Sitush ( talk) 08:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Would you like to weigh in at the discussion in Talk:India on some 40 odd images? I know that's a lot, but a simple Yes/No would be adequate. Of course, if you choose to comment at more length, it would be even better. The India page is now the second most-viewed country page (after the US) and the 15th page overall, so having a set of high quality representative pictures becomes even more imperative. Regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 16:59, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
How can i enable my email? Nikkul ( talk) 02:14, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
For your laborious work on the article Kunbi. utcursch | talk 10:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC) |
Civility Award | ||
For keeping your cool while being under persistent, one sided attacks on the Kunbi article, and other forums. One can certainly learn from your example there. MW ℳ 11:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC) |
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Consistent to my opinion regarding user:YellowMonkey, not editing isn't a manifestation of compliance or good editing, keep editing, Wikipedia has millions of articles, which you can contribute to within the limits of the ban. Yogesh Khandke ( talk) 17:39, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
This is to inform you that your request for arbitration has been declined.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee -- Alexandr Dmitri ( talk) 12:35, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
At the time of my ban, I was working on a template and an article on disputed treasures in British museums. Any takers to create the template and the article in the respective spaces? You will find the template in my User:Zuggernaut/Template:Disputed treasures subpage. The sources for the article are in another User:Zuggernaut/Disputed treasures subpage. Zuggernaut ( talk) 16:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
|}
asking politely to add a source is "bullying"?. This from someone who labels people who dont agree with him as "brown sahib" and "acting white"?. hmmm thats rich-- Sodabottle ( talk) 13:15, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I would be glad to add to such a topic like 'Hindu Symbolism' which is absent on Wikipedia. See this - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolism. ..असक्तः सततं कार्य कर्म समाचर | असक्तः हि आचरन् कर्म.. Humour Thisthat2011 09:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
i was wondering if you could help to have a readily usable form transcluded to this page! thanks. -- CarTick ( talk) 22:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for the award. Your GAs like Upanishads and Deshastha Brahmin are always a joy to read. Please let me know if you need constructive critism/peer review to improve your articles or if you and I can collaborate on an article creation/improvement to make it a DYK/GA. I always try all best for that (considering time-constraints - I am spending lesser hours on wikipedia due to real life and the trend does not seem to end soon), but in long ugly disputes and arguments, I may not be the best person to approach as I tend to stay away from them as much as possible. I have also replied on my talk concerning "Emic sources" discussion on my talk. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 07:13, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
What happened? No it wasn't my primary hand, it was my left hand. (You write English remarkably well.) The cast was taken off yesterday, though it is very stiff, and I now can use all eight fingers and both thumbs to type now, which is such a comfort. Yogesh Khandke ( talk) 12:13, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, i know it's dumb of me to give it so late, but i've got a suggestion for you. You could contribute to articles related to Hinduism in Southeast Asia, and the ancient Hindu and Buddhist empires there such as Majapahit, Champa, Sri Vijaya, Sailendra, etc. Joyson Noel Holla at me! 06:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
... for the image replacement on my user page. :) Best wishes to you, -- J N 466 00:58, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar! utcursch | talk 15:26, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Some possible problems relating to your edits were brought to my attention; and I wanted to re-iterate that the topic ban is broadly applied - which means you shouldn't be involved in any discussion relating to Indian history, even if not really commenting on Indian history (this relates to your comment on Dougweller's talk page). Whilst it could be argued not to be a direct topic ban violation, it is skirting the edge of it very closely and is best avoided - especially as the intent seems to be to join the discussion w/o technically violating the ban. With that said; the topic of encouraging new editors (that you raised) is an important wiki-wide one which is being discussed at the meta/foundation level - if you can find a place to discuss it that is not in a context related to your topic ban (and avoid bringing Indian history into any discussion) I am sure there is much you can contribute.
More concerning though is giving this barnstar, which is the sort of inappropriate inciting that led to the topic ban. Also the follow up comment, which is definitely over the line of your topic ban. Finally this edit is well over the line and directly discusses the topic of Indian history.
I've specifically decided not to issue a block for those comments because a) they are a few days back and b) you do seem to be making a reasonable effort (if begrudgingly) to operate within the limits of the topic ban. But you have to stop this kind of activity; in the future admins may not be so lenient with your actions. Treat the topic ban extremely conservatively, and if you think you might be verging on violating it, assume you are.
Please take this as a polite but stern warning about edits such as the ones above; avoid them in the future and you will be fine. Thanks. -- Errant ( chat!) 13:32, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
I have been asking you many times about the status of your ban. Z your ban was unnecessary. I have said enough on Errantx's page and ArbCom and on the pages of individual members. As far as I understand, your case was rejected from arbcom not because it didn't hold water but because, in their opinion, all avenues had not been exhausted, please see Errantx's comments, he emphasised that he merely implemented a decision, and if I remember right, he considered a review possible, and that it could be overturned??? I think you should be using all your energies to this issue. Certain articles are badly dealt with, by people who don't have expertise, this has been heard from the highest places, (Ms. Gardner). I suggest that you first work on your ban and then, towards adminship, you are one of the stronger emic editors. Yogesh Khandke ( talk) 14:50, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zuggernaut for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Sitush ( talk) 12:20, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Z,
Thanks for your response on my talk page. I do hope you are coming for the WikiConference in November where I hope to meet you in real life. AshLin ( talk) 15:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks Zuggernaut. Much appreciated! Veryhuman ( talk) 13:51, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
Alternate suggestion as "Swami Rambhadracharya" Redtigerxyz Talk 17:22, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello mate.. the article which you have nominated as GA has failed because of multiple issues ,It's better if you go for peer review.after making possible corrections you can re-nominate the article thank you.. 16:04, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Template:Maharashtrian Bhakti saints has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Evil IP address ( talk) 15:43, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
MW ℳ 17:09, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
MW ℳ 15:19, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks a ton for appreciation! It's really encouraging for a newbie like me from my fellow Wikipedian! Cheers,
Ram ( talk • contribs) 17:15, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Qwyrxian ( talk) 03:45, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 23:46, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Zuggernaut! Wanted to remind that Jagadguru Rambhadracharya's GA review still needs to be completed, and all the issues raised like copyedit are fixed now, so can u review it now? :) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 15:40, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
I will AGF and presume that your deletion of my reply on talk:MangoWong was accidental rather than intentional. I would appreciate if you would restore my comments immediately. JanetteDoe ( talk) 03:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi, why do you change to the sfn template when there is an existing, working template in use? The latest example of this is at Kunbi. - Sitush ( talk) 08:48, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
Would you like to weigh in at the discussion in Talk:India on some 40 odd images? I know that's a lot, but a simple Yes/No would be adequate. Of course, if you choose to comment at more length, it would be even better. The India page is now the second most-viewed country page (after the US) and the 15th page overall, so having a set of high quality representative pictures becomes even more imperative. Regards, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 16:59, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
How can i enable my email? Nikkul ( talk) 02:14, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
The Writer's Barnstar | |
For your laborious work on the article Kunbi. utcursch | talk 10:25, 17 October 2011 (UTC) |
Civility Award | ||
For keeping your cool while being under persistent, one sided attacks on the Kunbi article, and other forums. One can certainly learn from your example there. MW ℳ 11:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC) |
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |