![]() |
Hi Zlad!! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC) |
Hello, Zlad!. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
23:10, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
07:08, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Zlad!. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your edit to
Georgian Dream has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa (
talk)
14:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Georgian Dream, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreign secretary. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Vif12vf. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Democratic Movement – United Georgia, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
16:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
New Rights Party, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
16:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
If you have time, could remove sections that refer to the party using its own website as a reference? ValenciaThunderbolt ( talk) 08:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Global War Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page List of political parties in Georgia.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 21:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Girchi. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 12:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I see you went ahead and did some hostile personal attack undo on another article since you did not agree with my comments on a different Talk page. This is a nice WP:NOTBATTLE violation, but lets keep that aside. So, on topic:
"Undid revision 1233863160 by 185.5.68.137 (talk) Green deal agenda lol."
Please suggest then, how would you concisely describe the policy diaśagreement on the Green Deal sub-policies - in all their complexity - in more "neutral words". I switched it to "Green Deal agenda of the EU" to indicate the disagreement is *inside* and mainly on specific implementation policies. Not the high level objectives as the current text indicates.
We need a text there that would avoid conflating the desire to change the specific sub-policies of the GD agenda to the position on the GD general goals themselves. And this is important as this nuance is the defining characteristic fo the PfE group and specifically the reason of ANO leaving the ALDE/RE grouping.
Unfortunately, the current text you reverted to indicates a different position was on the GD as a whole. You are likely aware that Babiš was and still is one of the supporters of the overall Green Deal goals. But this the statement in the article is now very raw, to the point of stating it is to the contrary:
"... due to "different positions" on the European Green Deal and the EU's migration policy" is at a minimum misleading.
It also does not align with the source used:
“We went to the elections to fight illegal migration, to change the Green Deal, which is destroying our European industry and agriculture and is having a negative impact on our citizens,”
The source - unlike the WP text - makes it clear the disagreements are specific, not general:
* about the internals of the GD sub-policies - aka the "Green Deal agenda" in the general meaning of the "agenda" word in English, not GD per se as the text now indicates
/if you are a Czech speaker, you are excused, using such a term in Czech could indeed be seen as inappropriate due to the connotations it has, but this is the English WP, not a Czech one/
The other part is about the illegal migration policies - again, the word "illegal" is removed on WP, completely changing the meaning of the source cited. But you did not mention this, so I assume you are fine with that part of the fix.
If you have a better way to concisely describe what - I sincerely believe - is best described as "the Green Deal agenda of the EU" - without losing the meaning pleae suggest. The current text is not acceptable as it is overly-simplifying to the point of presenting a political position completely separate from the one it is to convey. 185.5.68.137 ( talk) 12:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alliance of Patriots of Georgia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azerbaijani.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Zlad!! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC) |
Hello, Zlad!. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Snuggums (
talk /
edits)
23:10, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
Walter Görlitz (
talk)
07:08, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Zlad!. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your edit to
Georgian Dream has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa (
talk)
14:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Georgian Dream, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreign secretary. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Vif12vf. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Democratic Movement – United Georgia, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
16:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
New Rights Party, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
16:08, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
If you have time, could remove sections that refer to the party using its own website as a reference? ValenciaThunderbolt ( talk) 08:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Global War Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page List of political parties in Georgia.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 21:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Girchi. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The Herald (Benison) ( talk) 12:12, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I see you went ahead and did some hostile personal attack undo on another article since you did not agree with my comments on a different Talk page. This is a nice WP:NOTBATTLE violation, but lets keep that aside. So, on topic:
"Undid revision 1233863160 by 185.5.68.137 (talk) Green deal agenda lol."
Please suggest then, how would you concisely describe the policy diaśagreement on the Green Deal sub-policies - in all their complexity - in more "neutral words". I switched it to "Green Deal agenda of the EU" to indicate the disagreement is *inside* and mainly on specific implementation policies. Not the high level objectives as the current text indicates.
We need a text there that would avoid conflating the desire to change the specific sub-policies of the GD agenda to the position on the GD general goals themselves. And this is important as this nuance is the defining characteristic fo the PfE group and specifically the reason of ANO leaving the ALDE/RE grouping.
Unfortunately, the current text you reverted to indicates a different position was on the GD as a whole. You are likely aware that Babiš was and still is one of the supporters of the overall Green Deal goals. But this the statement in the article is now very raw, to the point of stating it is to the contrary:
"... due to "different positions" on the European Green Deal and the EU's migration policy" is at a minimum misleading.
It also does not align with the source used:
“We went to the elections to fight illegal migration, to change the Green Deal, which is destroying our European industry and agriculture and is having a negative impact on our citizens,”
The source - unlike the WP text - makes it clear the disagreements are specific, not general:
* about the internals of the GD sub-policies - aka the "Green Deal agenda" in the general meaning of the "agenda" word in English, not GD per se as the text now indicates
/if you are a Czech speaker, you are excused, using such a term in Czech could indeed be seen as inappropriate due to the connotations it has, but this is the English WP, not a Czech one/
The other part is about the illegal migration policies - again, the word "illegal" is removed on WP, completely changing the meaning of the source cited. But you did not mention this, so I assume you are fine with that part of the fix.
If you have a better way to concisely describe what - I sincerely believe - is best described as "the Green Deal agenda of the EU" - without losing the meaning pleae suggest. The current text is not acceptable as it is overly-simplifying to the point of presenting a political position completely separate from the one it is to convey. 185.5.68.137 ( talk) 12:53, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alliance of Patriots of Georgia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Azerbaijani.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)