![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hey, Yerpo. I've been taking an interest on working on the article after I saw the peer review. I have a question for you. In one of the sections, it says that the Olm was featured on the Tolar coin. However, from my analysis, it seems to be a stotin coin instead. Since I'm not very familiar with the currency, would you mind telling me if it's right or wrong? bibliomaniac 1 5 An age old question... 22:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I will look it over again by to tomorrow.-- BirgitteSB 12:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi there! You are welcome to join WikiProject Slovenia . We need as many Slovene members as possible!!
♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 21:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Your image of the Great Crested Grebe is really splendid. Thanks for your contribution. -- Eleassar my talk 18:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay (I have a life offline, fortunately or unfortunately depending on circumstances :-)). I just okayed it. I liked the first hook too. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 09:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
I have adopted Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-10-01 Sveta Gera. There are some questions to help get things underway. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Vassyana ( talk) 15:05, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the award. WP:Slovenia is now independent! Count Blofeld 23:08, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Sploh nisem vedel, da imamo WP:SLO. Načeloma članke o Sloveniji urejam manj pogosto, da bi se izognil POVju, pa še tistih nekaj, kar sem jih pogledal v zadnjem času ni imelo oznake, da so pod okriljem tegale WPja. Si bom dal na watchlist. TomorrowTime ( talk) 13:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thanks for cleaning up the cats; i write & copyedit mostly. was still working thru categorizing, but it's not rly my thing. i appreciate the effort!
Lx 121 ( talk) 10:48, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
-- Dravecky ( talk) 18:13, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Gatoclass ( talk) 15:52, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Yerpo! The article Jovan Hadži has been created by Dr. Blofeld yesterday and he asked Viator slovenicus to expand it. You could do this more easily. Perhaps you could take time to write at least a decent introduction about Hadži. Cheers, -- Eleassar my talk 19:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
You are invited to join WikiProject Intertranswiki and join Wikipedia:WikiProject Intertranswiki/Slovenian. It is intended to be a joint group between Intertranswiki and WikiProject Slovenia of which you are already a part of The aim is to draw up a directory of missing articles from Slovenian wikipedia, extract what is notable or suitable, and build a team of translators to work at bridging the gaps in knowledge between other wikipedias. Even if you can't contribute much in starting content, your help is much needed to help draw up detailed lists of missing articles for Slovenia in the new project space and help other editors work through lists to build content more fully. Dr. Blofeld White cat 10:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Did you know 07:28, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I've added the flag. Please take a moment to review WP:ROLLBACK if you haven't already. Pedro : Chat 21:22, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Yerpo,
Per the description at the top of the Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates page: "For promotion, if an image is listed here for about seven days with four or more reviewers in support (excluding the nominator(s)) and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list...".
This minimum was recently upped from 3 + nominator to 4 + nominator (see Wikipedia_talk:Featured_picture_candidates/Archive_25#Changing_to_Minimum_of_5_Supports), so indeed this was unfortunate as two months ago it would have been promoted.
You will note that I allowed it an extra day (eight days) to see if it would garner more votes. There's not really any exact time for how long nominations get, to a large extent it simply depends on when a closer comes along, but there has been considerable discussion (often unpleasant) on this point and about nominations being left open for long periods at FPC:Talk during this year.
If you disagree with my decision you can challenge it at the nomination (that's why we now have the 'Recently closed' section on the FPC page which was only added during this year) or at FPC:Talk. Alternatively you are welcome to renominate at any time, especially for a nomination such as this that had support but not enough votes.
Cheers, -- jjron ( talk) 22:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
I don't know if you care, but I wanted to let you know that I created a redirect to a page you created, Palško lake. The redirect was Palsko lake. Pepper· piggle 21:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Palško lake at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Nick Ottery (
talk)
10:59, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 11:42, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello Yerpo! Several categories related to music competition winners are being targetted, and I think it would be useful that you give your opinion regarding the neccesity (or not) of these categories and maybe later help proposing changes to the present guidelines (music awards and prizes). Category:Primrose International Viola Competition prize-winners has been already deleted. The categories proposed for deletion are #Category:Prize-winners of the Leeds International Pianoforte Competition, #category:Prize-winners of the Paloma O'Shea Piano Competition, #Category:Operalia, #Category:Ferruccio Busoni International Piano Competition and #Category:Prize-winners of the Besançon Conducting Competition. Cheers.-- Karljoos ( talk) 21:47, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Fritillaria meleagris LJ barje2.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Jujutacular
T ·
C
20:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
|
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 18:43, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 2 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cerithidea decollata, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:03, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ivan Regen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:21, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for making that more encyclopaedic... a part of you dying seems a bit harsh though! As the player of the game, it would be "you" performing those actions, after all.
(And man, do you have that article on watch or something? That must have been about a 30 second response time :) 77.102.101.220 ( talk) 13:02, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Yerpo, I would just like to ask why you labled this disaster [1] as not sifficiently important...this definately made world headlines. 29 people were killed, and this coming from me who lives in another country. This has international significance, there are natural disasters that are included in the years articles that even have less of a death toll... It should definately be included.-- MelbourneStar☆ (talk to me) 14:39, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
The shooting on Jan. 8 should be recognized in the 2011 article. I have reasons! -- Solowing106 ( talk) 01:52, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Discussion moved to Talk:Icy Tower#Linking in the Icy Tower's infobox — Yerpo Eh? 11:36, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
To si rekel na wikipediji, da to ni pomembno kaj pišejo drugi, ker na wikipediji ti pišeš zgodovino, torej ti ponarediš stvari in zgodovine. Če gledaš na Cobissu http://cobiss4.izum.si/scripts/cobiss?id=2138195125814027 imam diplomsko delo iz prekmurske teme, torej moja beseda je prava, tvoja pa ni. Koliko si se ukvarjal s to temo? Samo tiste propagande vire gledaš, ki jih so napisali Kranjec, Šebjanič, Godina, Čačinovič in drugi? To misliš, da radi imajo Prekmurci Ljubljančare? Doncsecz talk 19:40, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Naj bo tvoja briga, ker mi ne študiramo iz tistih neuglednih virov, torej če ne uporabim teh virov, zakaj je potrebno tukaj uporabiti? Naj bo tvoja briga, da sem napisal diplomsko nalogo, ker so jo sprejeli, torej moja diplomska naloga je verodostojen vir. In zakaj je potrebno stari navadni kristavec? Tebi treba razumeti, da kaj delaš ti, to protivno proti načelu wikipedije, ker wikipedija maksimalno dovoli, da napr. iz arhiva uporabimo vire. Prosim te, ne komentiraj tistega pogovara, ker tvoja kraljevina je slovenska wikipedija. Doncsecz talk 20:05, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Nočem te žaliti, samo svetujem, da išči Toporišičevo slovnico, ker je ne vidim med viri in seveda več člankov piše o slovenskem jeziku, tam iščite napake. Meni niso rekli, kaj so napake, pa jih ne bom iskal. Doncsecz talk 20:47, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Če želiš, jaz bom tudi pisal nekaj "pljuvanj" o Vas, kaki ljudje ste Vi na slovenski wikipediji. Bom pokazal mojemu predavatelju tudi, naj popravi besedilo. Ne ne le enega članka, temveč več: kak se obnašate, da norosti pišete o Sloveniji in o sosednjih državah. Ne vem koliko člankov madžarskih naselij ima slabe podatke (kot sl:Egyházasrádóc, naselje v Železni županiji, vendar v članku to pišete, da je v županiji Tolna). Kakšno kakovost hočete Vi? Doncsecz talk 06:50, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Zakaj bi bil misteriozni moj predavatelj? Ne moreš pogledati strani sombotelske univerze? In to zakaj bi bilo smetanje? Pogovorna stran je za pogovor, torej midva sva tukaj pogovarjava, a ne? toliko. Doncsecz talk 07:32, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Boš se presenetil Yerpo, samo enega pravega imam, pa dva druga sta me učila tudi. V Sombotelu ne študira sto učencev na slovenistiki, samo trije. Ne vem odkod si vzel, da je to blatenje, dokler tvoje delo ni bilo drugačno. Doncsecz talk 08:44, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Yerpo, some kind of weird markup error has appeared in the notes you added at Slovene dialects (displaying stuff like ?UNIQ485008cb1b47f5a9-nowiki-0000008F-QINU?25?UNIQ485008cb1b47f5a9-nowiki-00000090-QINU?). Some kind of link rot, maybe? Or maybe just my display? I'd appreciate it if you could take a look. Thanks, Doremo ( talk) 12:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for finding the real reason why the film was excluded! I thought it had to be something else apart from it being a silent film. Thanks again. Lugnuts ( talk) 09:53, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Plarem has given you some
caramel and a
candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun
Halloween treats, and promote
WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween!
If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{ subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message! |
![]() |
Happy Halloween! – Plarem (
User
talk
contribs)
15:19, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Yerpo,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Fritillaria meleagris LJ barje2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 14, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2011-11-14. howcheng { chat} 21:40, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
– Plarem (
User
talk
contribs) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
– Plarem ( User talk contribs) 13:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 14 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ecologists Without Borders, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that over 10% of Slovenia's population participated in each of the volunteer cleanups organized by the Ecologists Without Borders association, the Let's Clean Slovenia in One Day! in 2010 and this year's Let's Clean Slovenia 2012? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:04, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 14 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Let's Clean Slovenia in One Day!, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that over 10% of Slovenia's population participated in each of the volunteer cleanups organized by the Ecologists Without Borders association, the Let's Clean Slovenia in One Day! in 2010 and this year's Let's Clean Slovenia 2012? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:05, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 14 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Let's Clean Slovenia 2012, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that over 10% of Slovenia's population participated in each of the volunteer cleanups organized by the Ecologists Without Borders association, the Let's Clean Slovenia in One Day! in 2010 and this year's Let's Clean Slovenia 2012? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks for pointing out the Wiki policy on the Olympian article! JoelWhy ( talk) 15:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC) |
![]() | You're invited to be a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Belgrade, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the University of Belgrade. To accept this invitation, click here! Articles related to other universities in Belgrade, Serbia and Southeast Europe may be discussed as well. This helps share information and foster knowledge about higher education in the region. |
![]() |
AHK barnstar |
Thanks for your changes in User:Emijrp/All human knowledge. emijrp ( talk) 14:11, 4 June 2012 (UTC) |
Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 17:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Okay Yerpo. I don't want to sound rude, but please let me explain the difference between awards and award's. You implied that "In the awards history" should be corrected to "In the award's history". In this instance (awards) is perfectly correct as a noun. The award's mine = a shortened version of "The award is mine". The awards = is the plural version of the noun.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/awards#English
e.g Aisling Bea has won several awards. Her award's well deserved. I understand you thought you were right, so you re-edited the entry to reflect your stubbornness and mis-education. Please research before you decide to impose your misspellings upon others. There was absolutely no need to correct it to award's which isn't literally correct in this instance. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tm011g6433 ( talk • contribs) 11:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Can you even read properly what I'm telling you. eg Signifies EXAMPLE. This was why it preceded my mock-up example text to stress and highlight differences between the two examples (I suppose I should add an apostrophe and make it example's?). It also implies to me your English language skills are not exemplary enough to call yourself fluent. This was me highlighting the difference between Award's (a multitude of individual awards) and Awards (a collective way to refer to them). You have read the use of word "award's" and decided this is the only way to use that term. There can be no other, and as a revelation to the English language -we must all accept your decision. Should anybody disagree, you will impose your erroneous use of the English Language upon people (which you demonstrated by your arrogance and failure to discuss before you edited). The word became Award's because it was plural in the newspaper article (which means more than one!).
As an entity, the Award Ceremony is ONLY refered to as "awards" which I PREVIOUSLY pointed out via the Wiktionary link. This refers to the entity, not the number. And if you had bothered to pay attention to the very article you quoted, you would have noticed the demonstrated use of Awards in the second last paragraph:
"Nica Burns, the West End theatre producer and organiser of the Edinburgh comedy awards" [2]
To summarise, it would only be Award's if it was descriptively more than one. "The awards history" is talking about the history of THE AWARD, and as a single entity.
Thank you for your valuable time and arrogance! pfffff
Goodbye indeed!
--
Tm011g6433 (
talk)
02:21, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.
If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:40, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Yerpo,
24 hours have not passed and I am still bussy adding sources. The subject is no of the premier divers in the world and lessor divers have been inlcuded onto wikipedia. I agree that article can be written better and will comply with the request. I urge you to if you do a quick internet research to at least hit the following site http://www.eurotek.uk.com/johanboshoff.htm. He is one of the presenters of the international technical dive expo and one only gets invited if see as your peer as being notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PoseidonDiver ( talk • contribs) 09:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I left a message at this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Louis_Adamic#Not_his_picture Please let me know what is better to do, considering I am not a regular contributor and my time is really limited. Hvala!-- Andrew Nino ( talk) 15:09, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I've removed Taghishsimon's name from the request as it appears unlikely they will do anything with it, and it's more likely to get a copy editor without one being listed. Regards, -- Stfg ( talk) 20:24, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi Yerpo! How are you? I'm a beginner contributor of Wikipedia and i'm trying to write an spanish article about University of Maribor. I tried to use the logo that you uploaded but unfortunately I couldn't. Do you know why? Is any copyright protection? I thought all the media uploaded was available for any language. Thanks in advance, hope you can help me, Sole.-- SoleFabrizio ( talk) 02:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Yerpo! I just realized you reverted some accidental vandalism I committed on the Movie camera page - much obliged. I had only meant to correct a few minor stylistic things, but apparently I fat-fingered the commit. Best regards, -- Nettings ( talk) 19:44, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hey, Yerpo. I've been taking an interest on working on the article after I saw the peer review. I have a question for you. In one of the sections, it says that the Olm was featured on the Tolar coin. However, from my analysis, it seems to be a stotin coin instead. Since I'm not very familiar with the currency, would you mind telling me if it's right or wrong? bibliomaniac 1 5 An age old question... 22:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I will look it over again by to tomorrow.-- BirgitteSB 12:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi there! You are welcome to join WikiProject Slovenia . We need as many Slovene members as possible!!
♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 21:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Your image of the Great Crested Grebe is really splendid. Thanks for your contribution. -- Eleassar my talk 18:19, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay (I have a life offline, fortunately or unfortunately depending on circumstances :-)). I just okayed it. I liked the first hook too. Daniel Case ( talk) 03:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 09:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
I have adopted Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-10-01 Sveta Gera. There are some questions to help get things underway. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Vassyana ( talk) 15:05, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the award. WP:Slovenia is now independent! Count Blofeld 23:08, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Sploh nisem vedel, da imamo WP:SLO. Načeloma članke o Sloveniji urejam manj pogosto, da bi se izognil POVju, pa še tistih nekaj, kar sem jih pogledal v zadnjem času ni imelo oznake, da so pod okriljem tegale WPja. Si bom dal na watchlist. TomorrowTime ( talk) 13:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thanks for cleaning up the cats; i write & copyedit mostly. was still working thru categorizing, but it's not rly my thing. i appreciate the effort!
Lx 121 ( talk) 10:48, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
-- Dravecky ( talk) 18:13, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Gatoclass ( talk) 15:52, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Yerpo! The article Jovan Hadži has been created by Dr. Blofeld yesterday and he asked Viator slovenicus to expand it. You could do this more easily. Perhaps you could take time to write at least a decent introduction about Hadži. Cheers, -- Eleassar my talk 19:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
You are invited to join WikiProject Intertranswiki and join Wikipedia:WikiProject Intertranswiki/Slovenian. It is intended to be a joint group between Intertranswiki and WikiProject Slovenia of which you are already a part of The aim is to draw up a directory of missing articles from Slovenian wikipedia, extract what is notable or suitable, and build a team of translators to work at bridging the gaps in knowledge between other wikipedias. Even if you can't contribute much in starting content, your help is much needed to help draw up detailed lists of missing articles for Slovenia in the new project space and help other editors work through lists to build content more fully. Dr. Blofeld White cat 10:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Did you know 07:28, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I've added the flag. Please take a moment to review WP:ROLLBACK if you haven't already. Pedro : Chat 21:22, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Yerpo,
Per the description at the top of the Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates page: "For promotion, if an image is listed here for about seven days with four or more reviewers in support (excluding the nominator(s)) and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list...".
This minimum was recently upped from 3 + nominator to 4 + nominator (see Wikipedia_talk:Featured_picture_candidates/Archive_25#Changing_to_Minimum_of_5_Supports), so indeed this was unfortunate as two months ago it would have been promoted.
You will note that I allowed it an extra day (eight days) to see if it would garner more votes. There's not really any exact time for how long nominations get, to a large extent it simply depends on when a closer comes along, but there has been considerable discussion (often unpleasant) on this point and about nominations being left open for long periods at FPC:Talk during this year.
If you disagree with my decision you can challenge it at the nomination (that's why we now have the 'Recently closed' section on the FPC page which was only added during this year) or at FPC:Talk. Alternatively you are welcome to renominate at any time, especially for a nomination such as this that had support but not enough votes.
Cheers, -- jjron ( talk) 22:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
I don't know if you care, but I wanted to let you know that I created a redirect to a page you created, Palško lake. The redirect was Palsko lake. Pepper· piggle 21:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
Palško lake at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Nick Ottery (
talk)
10:59, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 11:42, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello Yerpo! Several categories related to music competition winners are being targetted, and I think it would be useful that you give your opinion regarding the neccesity (or not) of these categories and maybe later help proposing changes to the present guidelines (music awards and prizes). Category:Primrose International Viola Competition prize-winners has been already deleted. The categories proposed for deletion are #Category:Prize-winners of the Leeds International Pianoforte Competition, #category:Prize-winners of the Paloma O'Shea Piano Competition, #Category:Operalia, #Category:Ferruccio Busoni International Piano Competition and #Category:Prize-winners of the Besançon Conducting Competition. Cheers.-- Karljoos ( talk) 21:47, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
An image created by you has been promoted to
featured picture status Your image,
File:Fritillaria meleagris LJ barje2.jpg, was nominated on
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution!
Jujutacular
T ·
C
20:44, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
|
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 18:43, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() | On 2 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cerithidea decollata, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project ( nominate) 00:03, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ivan Regen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:21, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for making that more encyclopaedic... a part of you dying seems a bit harsh though! As the player of the game, it would be "you" performing those actions, after all.
(And man, do you have that article on watch or something? That must have been about a 30 second response time :) 77.102.101.220 ( talk) 13:02, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Yerpo, I would just like to ask why you labled this disaster [1] as not sifficiently important...this definately made world headlines. 29 people were killed, and this coming from me who lives in another country. This has international significance, there are natural disasters that are included in the years articles that even have less of a death toll... It should definately be included.-- MelbourneStar☆ (talk to me) 14:39, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
The shooting on Jan. 8 should be recognized in the 2011 article. I have reasons! -- Solowing106 ( talk) 01:52, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Discussion moved to Talk:Icy Tower#Linking in the Icy Tower's infobox — Yerpo Eh? 11:36, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
To si rekel na wikipediji, da to ni pomembno kaj pišejo drugi, ker na wikipediji ti pišeš zgodovino, torej ti ponarediš stvari in zgodovine. Če gledaš na Cobissu http://cobiss4.izum.si/scripts/cobiss?id=2138195125814027 imam diplomsko delo iz prekmurske teme, torej moja beseda je prava, tvoja pa ni. Koliko si se ukvarjal s to temo? Samo tiste propagande vire gledaš, ki jih so napisali Kranjec, Šebjanič, Godina, Čačinovič in drugi? To misliš, da radi imajo Prekmurci Ljubljančare? Doncsecz talk 19:40, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Naj bo tvoja briga, ker mi ne študiramo iz tistih neuglednih virov, torej če ne uporabim teh virov, zakaj je potrebno tukaj uporabiti? Naj bo tvoja briga, da sem napisal diplomsko nalogo, ker so jo sprejeli, torej moja diplomska naloga je verodostojen vir. In zakaj je potrebno stari navadni kristavec? Tebi treba razumeti, da kaj delaš ti, to protivno proti načelu wikipedije, ker wikipedija maksimalno dovoli, da napr. iz arhiva uporabimo vire. Prosim te, ne komentiraj tistega pogovara, ker tvoja kraljevina je slovenska wikipedija. Doncsecz talk 20:05, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Nočem te žaliti, samo svetujem, da išči Toporišičevo slovnico, ker je ne vidim med viri in seveda več člankov piše o slovenskem jeziku, tam iščite napake. Meni niso rekli, kaj so napake, pa jih ne bom iskal. Doncsecz talk 20:47, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Če želiš, jaz bom tudi pisal nekaj "pljuvanj" o Vas, kaki ljudje ste Vi na slovenski wikipediji. Bom pokazal mojemu predavatelju tudi, naj popravi besedilo. Ne ne le enega članka, temveč več: kak se obnašate, da norosti pišete o Sloveniji in o sosednjih državah. Ne vem koliko člankov madžarskih naselij ima slabe podatke (kot sl:Egyházasrádóc, naselje v Železni županiji, vendar v članku to pišete, da je v županiji Tolna). Kakšno kakovost hočete Vi? Doncsecz talk 06:50, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Zakaj bi bil misteriozni moj predavatelj? Ne moreš pogledati strani sombotelske univerze? In to zakaj bi bilo smetanje? Pogovorna stran je za pogovor, torej midva sva tukaj pogovarjava, a ne? toliko. Doncsecz talk 07:32, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Boš se presenetil Yerpo, samo enega pravega imam, pa dva druga sta me učila tudi. V Sombotelu ne študira sto učencev na slovenistiki, samo trije. Ne vem odkod si vzel, da je to blatenje, dokler tvoje delo ni bilo drugačno. Doncsecz talk 08:44, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Yerpo, some kind of weird markup error has appeared in the notes you added at Slovene dialects (displaying stuff like ?UNIQ485008cb1b47f5a9-nowiki-0000008F-QINU?25?UNIQ485008cb1b47f5a9-nowiki-00000090-QINU?). Some kind of link rot, maybe? Or maybe just my display? I'd appreciate it if you could take a look. Thanks, Doremo ( talk) 12:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for finding the real reason why the film was excluded! I thought it had to be something else apart from it being a silent film. Thanks again. Lugnuts ( talk) 09:53, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Plarem has given you some
caramel and a
candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun
Halloween treats, and promote
WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween!
If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{ subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message! |
![]() |
Happy Halloween! – Plarem (
User
talk
contribs)
15:19, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Yerpo,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Fritillaria meleagris LJ barje2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 14, 2011. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2011-11-14. howcheng { chat} 21:40, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
– Plarem (
User
talk
contribs) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
– Plarem ( User talk contribs) 13:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 14 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ecologists Without Borders, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that over 10% of Slovenia's population participated in each of the volunteer cleanups organized by the Ecologists Without Borders association, the Let's Clean Slovenia in One Day! in 2010 and this year's Let's Clean Slovenia 2012? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:04, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 14 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Let's Clean Slovenia in One Day!, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that over 10% of Slovenia's population participated in each of the volunteer cleanups organized by the Ecologists Without Borders association, the Let's Clean Slovenia in One Day! in 2010 and this year's Let's Clean Slovenia 2012? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:05, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | On 14 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Let's Clean Slovenia 2012, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that over 10% of Slovenia's population participated in each of the volunteer cleanups organized by the Ecologists Without Borders association, the Let's Clean Slovenia in One Day! in 2010 and this year's Let's Clean Slovenia 2012? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber ( talk · contribs) 16:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks for pointing out the Wiki policy on the Olympian article! JoelWhy ( talk) 15:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC) |
![]() | You're invited to be a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Belgrade, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the University of Belgrade. To accept this invitation, click here! Articles related to other universities in Belgrade, Serbia and Southeast Europe may be discussed as well. This helps share information and foster knowledge about higher education in the region. |
![]() |
AHK barnstar |
Thanks for your changes in User:Emijrp/All human knowledge. emijrp ( talk) 14:11, 4 June 2012 (UTC) |
Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 17:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Okay Yerpo. I don't want to sound rude, but please let me explain the difference between awards and award's. You implied that "In the awards history" should be corrected to "In the award's history". In this instance (awards) is perfectly correct as a noun. The award's mine = a shortened version of "The award is mine". The awards = is the plural version of the noun.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/awards#English
e.g Aisling Bea has won several awards. Her award's well deserved. I understand you thought you were right, so you re-edited the entry to reflect your stubbornness and mis-education. Please research before you decide to impose your misspellings upon others. There was absolutely no need to correct it to award's which isn't literally correct in this instance. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tm011g6433 ( talk • contribs) 11:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Can you even read properly what I'm telling you. eg Signifies EXAMPLE. This was why it preceded my mock-up example text to stress and highlight differences between the two examples (I suppose I should add an apostrophe and make it example's?). It also implies to me your English language skills are not exemplary enough to call yourself fluent. This was me highlighting the difference between Award's (a multitude of individual awards) and Awards (a collective way to refer to them). You have read the use of word "award's" and decided this is the only way to use that term. There can be no other, and as a revelation to the English language -we must all accept your decision. Should anybody disagree, you will impose your erroneous use of the English Language upon people (which you demonstrated by your arrogance and failure to discuss before you edited). The word became Award's because it was plural in the newspaper article (which means more than one!).
As an entity, the Award Ceremony is ONLY refered to as "awards" which I PREVIOUSLY pointed out via the Wiktionary link. This refers to the entity, not the number. And if you had bothered to pay attention to the very article you quoted, you would have noticed the demonstrated use of Awards in the second last paragraph:
"Nica Burns, the West End theatre producer and organiser of the Edinburgh comedy awards" [2]
To summarise, it would only be Award's if it was descriptively more than one. "The awards history" is talking about the history of THE AWARD, and as a single entity.
Thank you for your valuable time and arrogance! pfffff
Goodbye indeed!
--
Tm011g6433 (
talk)
02:21, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email.
If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:40, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Yerpo,
24 hours have not passed and I am still bussy adding sources. The subject is no of the premier divers in the world and lessor divers have been inlcuded onto wikipedia. I agree that article can be written better and will comply with the request. I urge you to if you do a quick internet research to at least hit the following site http://www.eurotek.uk.com/johanboshoff.htm. He is one of the presenters of the international technical dive expo and one only gets invited if see as your peer as being notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PoseidonDiver ( talk • contribs) 09:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I left a message at this page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Louis_Adamic#Not_his_picture Please let me know what is better to do, considering I am not a regular contributor and my time is really limited. Hvala!-- Andrew Nino ( talk) 15:09, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I've removed Taghishsimon's name from the request as it appears unlikely they will do anything with it, and it's more likely to get a copy editor without one being listed. Regards, -- Stfg ( talk) 20:24, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi Yerpo! How are you? I'm a beginner contributor of Wikipedia and i'm trying to write an spanish article about University of Maribor. I tried to use the logo that you uploaded but unfortunately I couldn't. Do you know why? Is any copyright protection? I thought all the media uploaded was available for any language. Thanks in advance, hope you can help me, Sole.-- SoleFabrizio ( talk) 02:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Yerpo! I just realized you reverted some accidental vandalism I committed on the Movie camera page - much obliged. I had only meant to correct a few minor stylistic things, but apparently I fat-fingered the commit. Best regards, -- Nettings ( talk) 19:44, 16 December 2012 (UTC)