Hi YM. Clem Hill is slated for TFA on 19 December 2008. A busy week for WP:AUST on the main page! -- Mattinbgn\ talk 04:14, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
I think, at least in terms of the mean, the Invincibles project (and the Miller and Bill Johnston article especially!) have pushed us colonials over the top of the poms in the article size Ashes. I also note that the poms have given Sehwagology a bit of a setback today as well. Cheers, Mattinbgn\ talk 06:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind message and your support during the election. I intend staying as active as possible within Milhist - it'll be a good antidote for the crazies - if Jimbo appoints me. I suspect the agenda for the first six months or so will be reform! -- ROGER DAVIES talk 10:32, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I reverted your revert of the crazy IP editor with the outrageous edit summary. It looked like a whitewash of the girls was/is afoot and I have put the article back to where it was pending some real news coverage. Cheers, CliffC ( talk) 02:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Dear Sir,
I've spent several years working on a new history of Vietnam. This is (in part) why I haven't done any more work on the Viet history articles that I wrote 2+ years ago. I now know some of the material that I wrote is in error, and I have given a very different slant on other articles in my book. But - I'm not done. I'm still waiting for the "Cambridge History of China - Volume 4" because I would very much like to get the current word on the one time in all of Vietnamese history that the Viet attacked China (1075).
BTW: Regarding your nice article on the Nguyen Artillery, the Trinh also built artillery but, in general, they had less cash to pay for European artillery, and (since they were on the offensive most of the time) less interest in the heavy and generally immobile cannons. I see you have a new article coming on the army of the Nguyen Lords. May I suggest that one of the best sources of information on the Nguyen Lords and their government is by the historian Li Tana titled "Nguyen Cochinchina". (War Elephants!)
best wishes,
Cglassey ( talk) 05:51, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi Mr. Yellow Monkey. I'm having a bit of trouble with somebody you seme to be acquainted with, User:Bobo192. I appreciate the work he does with cricket but I'm finding it frustrating that he will not add stub tags to stub articles he creates and in effect removing one of the most important tools we have to expand them for other editors. Worse is the fact he will not stop to explain why he insists on not using them. Please can you try to put in a word on the matter as I only have the best interest towards the articles in the long term and expansion of them in the future. If editors who go through categories expanding cricket stubs they will be missing his articles and potentially the articles could suffer for it. Articles like Charles Alexander (cricketer, born 1839) etc. The Bald One White cat 21:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
I saw from here that WP:AUS is doing a GA 200 drive? Is there a unified page about this somewhere that lists all the Australia GAs, or is Category:GA-Class Australia articles accurate that there are 179 so far? Also, does the parent cat include all the GAs listed in those subcats? If that is the case, that is an attainable goal, actually. Cirt ( talk) 21:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Me again! When you have a minute, can you checkuser these? I haven't seen this IP range before (though of course it's still in Australia). Thanks, Pascal.Tesson ( talk) 23:07, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
A couple of more recent ones:
Hi YellowMonkey. I recently improved the Australia Day article, and I was hoping you could very quickly run through it and give some informal feedback before I nominate it as a Good Article. \ / ( ⁂ | ※) 03:34, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Well done! YellowMonkey ( bananabucket) 01:52, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Can you explain why you deleted the Sehwagology page please.
Suave, http://republiquecricket.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.58.233.129 ( talk) 12:20, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blnguyencount.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 06:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I believe User:Sea888 may be User:JacquesNguyen. Badagnani ( talk) 13:19, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
This editor is likely one of the dozens of sockpuppets active on ancient Vietnam- and southern China-related articles. They are blocked and simply create dozens more new usernames. Can you please do something to stop it? Badagnani ( talk) 22:56, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
I don't know; what does that mean? Badagnani ( talk) 18:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Could you have a look at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/PONDHEEPANKAR (2nd nomination). I believe a banned user has been socking via at least one account and a bunch of IPs. I see that you have edited the article previously and am hopeful that your knowledge of the topic and checkuser tools can be employed to shed light on these matters. Jehochman Talk 10:51, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
You are welcome to make more detailed comments/suggestions here, if you are not too terribly busy. -- BorgQueen ( talk) 01:32, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your message. I guess I never considered to include stub tags on my article templates, though I will try to get used to doing so in the near future. If between then and now you find instances where an article should be so tagged where I have not done so, please do if you have the time and patience.
I guess I never really considered my articles "stubs", as such. Most of the articles I have created within the last two years, I have more or less considered "as complete as possible with the limited amount of information I'm given on the subject". I'm too used to thinking horizontally, rather than vertically, on a topic - if that makes any sense. Bobo . 02:03, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much. You are very kind. Johnlp ( talk) 08:31, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 45 | 24 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 46 | 1 December 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
ArbCom elections: Elections open | Wikipedia in the news |
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System | Features and admins |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 1 | 3 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
I have an article on peer review, before sending for its third (hopefully, last!) FAC. If would be great if you have a few minutes to spare in providing some feedback. Thanks! - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 15:44, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi Bl. This matter pertains to an article which I have in PR right now, and the article's title and content. I am leaving this message for two more admins to get an overall opinion. I had created an article about a year back (Aug 2007) called Mysore kingdom literature which went as a subarticle to the main FA Kingdom of Mysore which also I authored. Shortly thereafter, another user changed the name to Literature of the Kingdom of Mysore (oct 13th 2007). This title stayed for quite a while. Around Nov 7th 2008, I started to expand the article with the intent of making it a FA. Being fully aware that all the writings described in the article were written in Kannada language, I moved the article to a more appropriate Kannada literature in the Kingdom of Mysore on Nov 13th 2008. However, after significant expansion thereafter, I had covered (for context/better roundedness) some writers and poets who had lived outside the Mysore territory, but never-the-less left an indelible impact on literature within the kingdom also. To give the article an apt name, because it now covered literature in Kannada language over an area larger than just the Kingdom of Mysore, user:Michael Devore (a frequent and helpful copy editor of my articles) and I though up the name Kannada literature, 1600–1900 CE. The period 1900-2000 is normally covered under Modern Kannada literature. Since I was solely resposiblle for writing the article, I did not think it necessary to start a discussion about the name change. About this time (Dec 5th 2008), User:Fowler &fowler had started a FAR on the original FA, Kingdom of Mysore, in which this literature related article I have described was a sub-article. Fowler first insisted that the name Kannada literature in the Kingdom of Mysore must stay as is since the main article was in FAR and that some of his concerns were linked to the sub-article on literature. I pointed out to him that a FAR can't include topics outside the main FAR'ed article itself. But now he claims that the article should include literature from the period 1900-1947 (the last part of the kingdoms existance). But he does not understand that adding details of literature from the period 1900-1947 to the article breaks the "mature" modern period of Kannada literature into two pieces, 1900-1947 and 1947- 2008, which quite logically should stay as one article, and does currently ( Modern Kannada literature. He has stared a thread on Talk:Kannada literature in the Kingdom of Mysore and Mattisse and Docku have supported him. I have not bothered to reply on that thread to prevent encouraging any verbose discussions that lead nowhere. So, I would like to know what your advice on the matter is. Over the last 1 year and 4 months (Aug2007- to date) I have done 99% of the edits and brought in 100% of the content. Everyone has an opinion on how to write an article and what to name an article, but I feel as the main contributor, I should be allowed to proceed with the title and content I last gave it, Kannada literature, 1600–1900 CE and let any discussions regarding title happen in the FAC with concensus. Also, the sub-article has nothing to do with the main FAR'ed article where Fowler seems to have concerns. Please advice. Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 20:13, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
PS:The period 1900-1950 would usually include numerous writers, far too numerous to include in the above summary style article under discusion. Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 20:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for making 2008 an interesting and enlightening year for me; I've found your comments amusing, helpful and thought-provoking—I'll let you guess which ones were which!
<font=3> Merry Christmas and all the best for the New Year! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 06:25, 25 December 2008 (UTC) |
---|
YellowMonkey,
I wish you and your family all the best this Christmas and that you also have a Happy and safe new year.
Thankyou for all your contributions to Wikipedia this year and I look forward to seeing many more from you in the future.
Your work around Wikipedia has not gone un-noticed, this notice is testimony to that
Please feel free to drop by my talkpage any time to say Hi, as I will probably say Hi back :)
All the Best.
«l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»
(talk)
Best wishes for the coming new year! Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 19:36, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion going on at WP:RFPP about whether to unprotect several articles. As the protecting administrator of M. L. Vasanthakumari and Bajrang Dal, you are invited to come join the discussion. NuclearWarfare contact me My work 02:07, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Could you investigate a bit (Coren helped out with some preliminary investigations)?— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 08:47, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Ernie Toshack with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dabomb87 ( talk) 16:02, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Happy New Year YellowMonkey/Archive103!!!! I wish for you and your family to have a wonderful 2009!!! Have fun partying and may you make many edits!!!
Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at RfC: Should Vietnam MIA material all be here or be located in a separate article and summarized here. Thank you. Wasted Time R ( talk) 17:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Happy New Year warrior! Regards -- Tarif from Bangladesh ( talk) 21:47, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
I dont keep a list, but some names who have put forward GAs lately are in no order:
-- Grahame ( talk) 10:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi there Peripitus. Grahamec gave me your name as a recent producer of a Australian GA. Well, we're within striking distance of 200 GAs at the moment and we decided to have a go at getting to 200 by the end of the year or Australia Day, same as the 100 drive last year. Hope to see you there at WP:AWNB/A and WP:AWNB ! YellowMonkey ( bananabucket) 05:33, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Here is one that is already GA but wasn't tagged with {{ WP Australia}} - " Bart vs. Australia". Cheers, Cirt ( talk) 05:09, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Australia#WP:AUS_GA_drive_-_200_GAs. Thank you, Cirt ( talk) 06:41, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
I was stalking around GAN and found Keith Miller in the 1946-47 Australian cricket season. One season? Really? I thought I was getting carried away with the overly-long Dwain Chambers and forthcoming Early life and athletics career of Usain Bolt. Given your seemingly endless pedigree of green circles and stars it appears I was heading in the right direction with this kind of thing after all! Ian Thorpe was my "template" for both Chambers and Bolt. I assume I can count on your input when I've got the condensed Usain Bolt at FAC? The lack of input on the Chambers FAC made my first attempt a quiet and unsuccessful affair... Sillyfolkboy ( talk) 04:01, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 00:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi YM. Clem Hill is slated for TFA on 19 December 2008. A busy week for WP:AUST on the main page! -- Mattinbgn\ talk 04:14, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
I think, at least in terms of the mean, the Invincibles project (and the Miller and Bill Johnston article especially!) have pushed us colonials over the top of the poms in the article size Ashes. I also note that the poms have given Sehwagology a bit of a setback today as well. Cheers, Mattinbgn\ talk 06:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind message and your support during the election. I intend staying as active as possible within Milhist - it'll be a good antidote for the crazies - if Jimbo appoints me. I suspect the agenda for the first six months or so will be reform! -- ROGER DAVIES talk 10:32, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I reverted your revert of the crazy IP editor with the outrageous edit summary. It looked like a whitewash of the girls was/is afoot and I have put the article back to where it was pending some real news coverage. Cheers, CliffC ( talk) 02:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Dear Sir,
I've spent several years working on a new history of Vietnam. This is (in part) why I haven't done any more work on the Viet history articles that I wrote 2+ years ago. I now know some of the material that I wrote is in error, and I have given a very different slant on other articles in my book. But - I'm not done. I'm still waiting for the "Cambridge History of China - Volume 4" because I would very much like to get the current word on the one time in all of Vietnamese history that the Viet attacked China (1075).
BTW: Regarding your nice article on the Nguyen Artillery, the Trinh also built artillery but, in general, they had less cash to pay for European artillery, and (since they were on the offensive most of the time) less interest in the heavy and generally immobile cannons. I see you have a new article coming on the army of the Nguyen Lords. May I suggest that one of the best sources of information on the Nguyen Lords and their government is by the historian Li Tana titled "Nguyen Cochinchina". (War Elephants!)
best wishes,
Cglassey ( talk) 05:51, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi Mr. Yellow Monkey. I'm having a bit of trouble with somebody you seme to be acquainted with, User:Bobo192. I appreciate the work he does with cricket but I'm finding it frustrating that he will not add stub tags to stub articles he creates and in effect removing one of the most important tools we have to expand them for other editors. Worse is the fact he will not stop to explain why he insists on not using them. Please can you try to put in a word on the matter as I only have the best interest towards the articles in the long term and expansion of them in the future. If editors who go through categories expanding cricket stubs they will be missing his articles and potentially the articles could suffer for it. Articles like Charles Alexander (cricketer, born 1839) etc. The Bald One White cat 21:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
I saw from here that WP:AUS is doing a GA 200 drive? Is there a unified page about this somewhere that lists all the Australia GAs, or is Category:GA-Class Australia articles accurate that there are 179 so far? Also, does the parent cat include all the GAs listed in those subcats? If that is the case, that is an attainable goal, actually. Cirt ( talk) 21:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Me again! When you have a minute, can you checkuser these? I haven't seen this IP range before (though of course it's still in Australia). Thanks, Pascal.Tesson ( talk) 23:07, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
A couple of more recent ones:
Hi YellowMonkey. I recently improved the Australia Day article, and I was hoping you could very quickly run through it and give some informal feedback before I nominate it as a Good Article. \ / ( ⁂ | ※) 03:34, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Well done! YellowMonkey ( bananabucket) 01:52, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Can you explain why you deleted the Sehwagology page please.
Suave, http://republiquecricket.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.58.233.129 ( talk) 12:20, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blnguyencount.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 06:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I believe User:Sea888 may be User:JacquesNguyen. Badagnani ( talk) 13:19, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
This editor is likely one of the dozens of sockpuppets active on ancient Vietnam- and southern China-related articles. They are blocked and simply create dozens more new usernames. Can you please do something to stop it? Badagnani ( talk) 22:56, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
I don't know; what does that mean? Badagnani ( talk) 18:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Could you have a look at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/PONDHEEPANKAR (2nd nomination). I believe a banned user has been socking via at least one account and a bunch of IPs. I see that you have edited the article previously and am hopeful that your knowledge of the topic and checkuser tools can be employed to shed light on these matters. Jehochman Talk 10:51, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
You are welcome to make more detailed comments/suggestions here, if you are not too terribly busy. -- BorgQueen ( talk) 01:32, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your message. I guess I never considered to include stub tags on my article templates, though I will try to get used to doing so in the near future. If between then and now you find instances where an article should be so tagged where I have not done so, please do if you have the time and patience.
I guess I never really considered my articles "stubs", as such. Most of the articles I have created within the last two years, I have more or less considered "as complete as possible with the limited amount of information I'm given on the subject". I'm too used to thinking horizontally, rather than vertically, on a topic - if that makes any sense. Bobo . 02:03, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much. You are very kind. Johnlp ( talk) 08:31, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 45 | 24 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 46 | 1 December 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
ArbCom elections: Elections open | Wikipedia in the news |
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System | Features and admins |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 1 | 3 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
I have an article on peer review, before sending for its third (hopefully, last!) FAC. If would be great if you have a few minutes to spare in providing some feedback. Thanks! - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 15:44, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi Bl. This matter pertains to an article which I have in PR right now, and the article's title and content. I am leaving this message for two more admins to get an overall opinion. I had created an article about a year back (Aug 2007) called Mysore kingdom literature which went as a subarticle to the main FA Kingdom of Mysore which also I authored. Shortly thereafter, another user changed the name to Literature of the Kingdom of Mysore (oct 13th 2007). This title stayed for quite a while. Around Nov 7th 2008, I started to expand the article with the intent of making it a FA. Being fully aware that all the writings described in the article were written in Kannada language, I moved the article to a more appropriate Kannada literature in the Kingdom of Mysore on Nov 13th 2008. However, after significant expansion thereafter, I had covered (for context/better roundedness) some writers and poets who had lived outside the Mysore territory, but never-the-less left an indelible impact on literature within the kingdom also. To give the article an apt name, because it now covered literature in Kannada language over an area larger than just the Kingdom of Mysore, user:Michael Devore (a frequent and helpful copy editor of my articles) and I though up the name Kannada literature, 1600–1900 CE. The period 1900-2000 is normally covered under Modern Kannada literature. Since I was solely resposiblle for writing the article, I did not think it necessary to start a discussion about the name change. About this time (Dec 5th 2008), User:Fowler &fowler had started a FAR on the original FA, Kingdom of Mysore, in which this literature related article I have described was a sub-article. Fowler first insisted that the name Kannada literature in the Kingdom of Mysore must stay as is since the main article was in FAR and that some of his concerns were linked to the sub-article on literature. I pointed out to him that a FAR can't include topics outside the main FAR'ed article itself. But now he claims that the article should include literature from the period 1900-1947 (the last part of the kingdoms existance). But he does not understand that adding details of literature from the period 1900-1947 to the article breaks the "mature" modern period of Kannada literature into two pieces, 1900-1947 and 1947- 2008, which quite logically should stay as one article, and does currently ( Modern Kannada literature. He has stared a thread on Talk:Kannada literature in the Kingdom of Mysore and Mattisse and Docku have supported him. I have not bothered to reply on that thread to prevent encouraging any verbose discussions that lead nowhere. So, I would like to know what your advice on the matter is. Over the last 1 year and 4 months (Aug2007- to date) I have done 99% of the edits and brought in 100% of the content. Everyone has an opinion on how to write an article and what to name an article, but I feel as the main contributor, I should be allowed to proceed with the title and content I last gave it, Kannada literature, 1600–1900 CE and let any discussions regarding title happen in the FAC with concensus. Also, the sub-article has nothing to do with the main FAR'ed article where Fowler seems to have concerns. Please advice. Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 20:13, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
PS:The period 1900-1950 would usually include numerous writers, far too numerous to include in the above summary style article under discusion. Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 20:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for making 2008 an interesting and enlightening year for me; I've found your comments amusing, helpful and thought-provoking—I'll let you guess which ones were which!
<font=3> Merry Christmas and all the best for the New Year! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 06:25, 25 December 2008 (UTC) |
---|
YellowMonkey,
I wish you and your family all the best this Christmas and that you also have a Happy and safe new year.
Thankyou for all your contributions to Wikipedia this year and I look forward to seeing many more from you in the future.
Your work around Wikipedia has not gone un-noticed, this notice is testimony to that
Please feel free to drop by my talkpage any time to say Hi, as I will probably say Hi back :)
All the Best.
«l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»
(talk)
Best wishes for the coming new year! Dineshkannambadi ( talk) 19:36, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion going on at WP:RFPP about whether to unprotect several articles. As the protecting administrator of M. L. Vasanthakumari and Bajrang Dal, you are invited to come join the discussion. NuclearWarfare contact me My work 02:07, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Could you investigate a bit (Coren helped out with some preliminary investigations)?— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 08:47, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Ernie Toshack with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dabomb87 ( talk) 16:02, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Happy New Year YellowMonkey/Archive103!!!! I wish for you and your family to have a wonderful 2009!!! Have fun partying and may you make many edits!!!
Hi! You might be interested in the discussion at RfC: Should Vietnam MIA material all be here or be located in a separate article and summarized here. Thank you. Wasted Time R ( talk) 17:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
Happy New Year warrior! Regards -- Tarif from Bangladesh ( talk) 21:47, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
I dont keep a list, but some names who have put forward GAs lately are in no order:
-- Grahame ( talk) 10:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi there Peripitus. Grahamec gave me your name as a recent producer of a Australian GA. Well, we're within striking distance of 200 GAs at the moment and we decided to have a go at getting to 200 by the end of the year or Australia Day, same as the 100 drive last year. Hope to see you there at WP:AWNB/A and WP:AWNB ! YellowMonkey ( bananabucket) 05:33, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Here is one that is already GA but wasn't tagged with {{ WP Australia}} - " Bart vs. Australia". Cheers, Cirt ( talk) 05:09, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Australia#WP:AUS_GA_drive_-_200_GAs. Thank you, Cirt ( talk) 06:41, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
I was stalking around GAN and found Keith Miller in the 1946-47 Australian cricket season. One season? Really? I thought I was getting carried away with the overly-long Dwain Chambers and forthcoming Early life and athletics career of Usain Bolt. Given your seemingly endless pedigree of green circles and stars it appears I was heading in the right direction with this kind of thing after all! Ian Thorpe was my "template" for both Chambers and Bolt. I assume I can count on your input when I've got the condensed Usain Bolt at FAC? The lack of input on the Chambers FAC made my first attempt a quiet and unsuccessful affair... Sillyfolkboy ( talk) 04:01, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
BorgQueen ( talk) 00:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)