![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Hello Yashovardhan Dhanania, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Marianna Russell, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: being the wife of a notable artist indicates significance/importance. If she is not notable, there is a valid target for merge/redirect as well per WP:ATD. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. So Why 09:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi
In contest a speedy deletion. Three books reference are given. The first one's author, Daniel Wildenstein, was internationally known and was a specialist of impressinost painting. Several busts of Marianna Russell are ewhibited in permanence in Musée Rodin in Paris, and in others museums in USA, in Australia, in Japan, in Poland. A wikipedia page about this personage is existing in French for many years and a another one in Italian. It would be a lack if this page would not exist in English. Axifrages — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axifrages ( talk • contribs) 10:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your feedback, but having done a LOT of rewriting, I'm at a loss as to what you now need from me. Having moderator after moderator reply with 'rewrite' is really not very much use to me, it requires very little from you, and provides me with no direction whatsoever. You say "I just went through the lead and it still reads like an essay." I've been through this with a teacher of English who is as much at a loss as I am. Can you please direct me to an example of exactly/specifically where you feel this is so desperately in need of revision? Thanks. MisterMcHugh ( talk) 11:10, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
I am a little surprise on how you determine no concensus to move the page. Exactly what Wikipedia policy are you basing this off? LakeKayak ( talk) 16:14, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Commented on the move review, but as a piece of advice if you want to start closing RMs: you are going to get some queries on your user talk for controversial moves. Sometimes sticking to your guns is justified, but I've found that if someone queries you on a not moved close that had varying opinions and hasn't been relisted in the past, it is normally best to relist as a courtesy. It saves the drama of a move review and allows a second set of eyes to review the discussion after more people have commented. TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Just as an FYI, when you relist an RM, you should put Template:Relisting immediately behind the nomination statement so that the bot will move it out of the backlog. You'll need to fix it at Talk:Fall of Fallujah (2014). I'd fix it, but I've commented on the RM, so I don't want it to look like I'm relisting an RM that I've commented on. TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:24, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Hi Yashovardhan: I've added secondary sources and pointed to NCPSB experts in news articles as you suggested. Looking forward to your next review.
Hi Yashovardhan: I've added secondary sources and pointed to NCPSB experts in news articles as you suggested. Looking forward to your next review.
Hi Yashovardhan: I've added secondary sources and pointed to NCPSB experts in news articles as you suggested. Looking forward to your next review. Ron Kremer ( talk) 19:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Ron Kremer
Hi Yashowardhan: I need a small help from you! do you know how to insert pictures in an article? rupa$$$ ( talk) 03:17, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
The reason the page does not seem to have enough information is because any more information will have 0 sources to backup, other than that, alot of zamalek sc's players have wiki pages which just say that they play in zamalek sc, without mentioning anything else.
And to answer your question, Abou el foutouh plays in the main squad, you can look for yourself in the wiki zamalek sc page. He plays as a left back and has played numerous times.
About the name, I would change it, just that the name in english has diffrent spelling Teky500 ( talk) 15:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello Yashovardhan,
Could you please be more specific as to why you rejected my article for Pavement Entertainment? I did resolve the pervious reviewers' concerns, and the draft I have now is very different than the older versions. For my sources, I have two Chicago Tribune articles, an encyclopedia for metal music, and two news articles/press releases from when the company re-established itself in 2012-13.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Hiku64 ( talk) 18:42, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
The past nominations are completely unrelated to the topic of the issue; The first two are from 2006 and 2010, and are completely unrelated to the change of the page name (which happened in late 2015). While the third one is actually against the 'Ag Qoyunlu' spelling as well. Thus I am not the only one that supports the title being changed. Not to mention that 'Ag Qoyunlu' is barely used compared to 'Aq Qoyunlu'. So I honestly don't get what the problem is. -- HistoryofIran ( talk) 17:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
No consensus is valid result, so I think your relisting was inappropriate. El_C 18:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm rather mystified by your RM closure for Talk:Clare Fischer & Salsa Picante Present "2 + 2". There was no opposition expressed, so how can there be a lack of consensus? — BarrelProof ( talk) 21:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
@ Andrewa: I guess that clears it. Sorry BarrelProof, another silly closure by me. Thanks Primefac for moving it already! Yashovardhan ( talk) 08:06, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. Yashovardhan or Primefac, could one of you please change the closure summary or add a postscript note, since what it currently says is not consistent with the current outcome? I would prefer not to do that myself, since I was the advocate of the RM. — BarrelProof ( talk) 16:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
Hello Yashovardhan Dhanania, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Marianna Russell, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: being the wife of a notable artist indicates significance/importance. If she is not notable, there is a valid target for merge/redirect as well per WP:ATD. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. So Why 09:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi
In contest a speedy deletion. Three books reference are given. The first one's author, Daniel Wildenstein, was internationally known and was a specialist of impressinost painting. Several busts of Marianna Russell are ewhibited in permanence in Musée Rodin in Paris, and in others museums in USA, in Australia, in Japan, in Poland. A wikipedia page about this personage is existing in French for many years and a another one in Italian. It would be a lack if this page would not exist in English. Axifrages — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axifrages ( talk • contribs) 10:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your feedback, but having done a LOT of rewriting, I'm at a loss as to what you now need from me. Having moderator after moderator reply with 'rewrite' is really not very much use to me, it requires very little from you, and provides me with no direction whatsoever. You say "I just went through the lead and it still reads like an essay." I've been through this with a teacher of English who is as much at a loss as I am. Can you please direct me to an example of exactly/specifically where you feel this is so desperately in need of revision? Thanks. MisterMcHugh ( talk) 11:10, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
I am a little surprise on how you determine no concensus to move the page. Exactly what Wikipedia policy are you basing this off? LakeKayak ( talk) 16:14, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Commented on the move review, but as a piece of advice if you want to start closing RMs: you are going to get some queries on your user talk for controversial moves. Sometimes sticking to your guns is justified, but I've found that if someone queries you on a not moved close that had varying opinions and hasn't been relisted in the past, it is normally best to relist as a courtesy. It saves the drama of a move review and allows a second set of eyes to review the discussion after more people have commented. TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Just as an FYI, when you relist an RM, you should put Template:Relisting immediately behind the nomination statement so that the bot will move it out of the backlog. You'll need to fix it at Talk:Fall of Fallujah (2014). I'd fix it, but I've commented on the RM, so I don't want it to look like I'm relisting an RM that I've commented on. TonyBallioni ( talk) 18:24, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Hi Yashovardhan: I've added secondary sources and pointed to NCPSB experts in news articles as you suggested. Looking forward to your next review.
Hi Yashovardhan: I've added secondary sources and pointed to NCPSB experts in news articles as you suggested. Looking forward to your next review.
Hi Yashovardhan: I've added secondary sources and pointed to NCPSB experts in news articles as you suggested. Looking forward to your next review. Ron Kremer ( talk) 19:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Ron Kremer
Hi Yashowardhan: I need a small help from you! do you know how to insert pictures in an article? rupa$$$ ( talk) 03:17, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
The reason the page does not seem to have enough information is because any more information will have 0 sources to backup, other than that, alot of zamalek sc's players have wiki pages which just say that they play in zamalek sc, without mentioning anything else.
And to answer your question, Abou el foutouh plays in the main squad, you can look for yourself in the wiki zamalek sc page. He plays as a left back and has played numerous times.
About the name, I would change it, just that the name in english has diffrent spelling Teky500 ( talk) 15:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello Yashovardhan,
Could you please be more specific as to why you rejected my article for Pavement Entertainment? I did resolve the pervious reviewers' concerns, and the draft I have now is very different than the older versions. For my sources, I have two Chicago Tribune articles, an encyclopedia for metal music, and two news articles/press releases from when the company re-established itself in 2012-13.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Hiku64 ( talk) 18:42, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
The past nominations are completely unrelated to the topic of the issue; The first two are from 2006 and 2010, and are completely unrelated to the change of the page name (which happened in late 2015). While the third one is actually against the 'Ag Qoyunlu' spelling as well. Thus I am not the only one that supports the title being changed. Not to mention that 'Ag Qoyunlu' is barely used compared to 'Aq Qoyunlu'. So I honestly don't get what the problem is. -- HistoryofIran ( talk) 17:44, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
No consensus is valid result, so I think your relisting was inappropriate. El_C 18:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm rather mystified by your RM closure for Talk:Clare Fischer & Salsa Picante Present "2 + 2". There was no opposition expressed, so how can there be a lack of consensus? — BarrelProof ( talk) 21:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
@ Andrewa: I guess that clears it. Sorry BarrelProof, another silly closure by me. Thanks Primefac for moving it already! Yashovardhan ( talk) 08:06, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. Yashovardhan or Primefac, could one of you please change the closure summary or add a postscript note, since what it currently says is not consistent with the current outcome? I would prefer not to do that myself, since I was the advocate of the RM. — BarrelProof ( talk) 16:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)