![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | → | Archive 20 |
I edited right behind you and did not see your response to 67.18.217.74 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) until after I posted. We are blocking an entire hosting company? What if the individual ip is not an open proxy any longer? Just asking because I don't know -- hoping for enlightenment. Thanks! - JodyB talk 16:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
i have a new account which is peterparker 3000 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterparker3000 ( talk • contribs) 03:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
In another one of his incarnations, User:MaryPoppins878 his is continuing to abuse his unblock privileges since you blocked the Grant page. Could you do the same for the MaryPoppins page at your convenience? Thank you. IrishLass ( talk) 14:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
User:Vicmm42 is back. First step was to re-upload the image you had deleted after blocking him, and re-insert it into Lindsay Lohan. Kww ( talk) 03:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
One of the mouseketeers, quickly heading towards the side of evil. You know she has been a constant source of light trouble on the Ashley Tisdale stuff, mainly for putting in unsourced stuff. Now she's graduated to creating apparently imaginary albums, like De Repente and Raven-Symoné (album). Trouble is, I don't think she's really a vandal. I think she's a Brazilian high-school kid that doesn't quite understand why everything she does gets deleted. Is there a way to find a Portuguese-speaking admin that can have a little chat with her and put her back on the straight-and-narrow? Kww ( talk) 03:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
This was archived while you were away, just wanted to make sure you saw it. In another one of his incarnations, User:MaryPoppins878 his is continuing to abuse his unblock privileges since you blocked the Grant page. Could you do the same for the MaryPoppins page at your convenience? Thank you. IrishLass ( talk) 16:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Helo Yamla
please, add [[pt:Fellowship of Friends]] in Fellowship of Friends.
Thanks Adailton ( talk) 20:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Yamla, Happy New Year! A user with multiple IP addresses is vandalising the article on Tashan. Please take a look at the history of the page. The user has used these IP addresses to vandalise the page: 117.198.146.102, 117.198.144.236, 117.198.146.31, 117.198.145.176 and 117.198.145.82. Note the first eight digits is the same in all the addresses (117.198.14). I don't know what to do as the user will continue to use multiple IP addresses to add it bac again. I am getting sick of vandalising it over and over again. -- Bollywood Dreamz Talk 03:26, 4 January 2008
Hi Yamla, was wondering if you could please take a look at the discussion currently taking place at Thriller 25, specifically this thread)? There is a debate about whether or not this article should be merged with Thriller (album) (I am a part of this discussion). Whatever the outcome of the consensus is not a huge deal to me personally, but I am concerned about possible WP:OWN issues by a specific editor whose most recent comment is "you WILL NOT make Thriller 25 small enough to merge and you WILL NOT make Thriller smaller without a consensus that it actually needs to be". I'm afraid that whatever what the outcome, this user will plow forward with his/her preferred version no matter what, and since I am directly involved with this I feel it would benefit all involved parties to have a neutral person check in. One thing I do not want to do is overstep any boundaries here. Thanks in advance. - eo ( talk) 22:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Check out the user Udonknome- I find it highly suspicious that he's editing both Italian soccer articles and music articles, much like Soprani, and his first edit was in the same period as the blocking. Just something I noticed. Thanks. Monsieurdl mon talk- mon contribs 22:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Yamla, I am requesting that you undo your partial revert here. Keeping this imaged tagged for deletion due to it's orphan status advances one side in a dispute which caused an edit war and flies in the face of the spirit of page protection which is to allow time for a consensus to form. Relavent threads you might want to note can be seen here at ANI and here at AN I urge you to reconsider. Thanks, R. Baley ( talk) 20:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Yamla, I hope that all is well. I suspect that Cpzphantom is making disruptive edits once again now under another sockpuppet ("Cocoliras"). This new user keeps making the same type of disruptive edits. Could you please take a look?-- Schonbrunn ( talk) 16:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
41.241.48.7 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) can you block him, please. His first edit was to Days of our Lives. I thought there was a range IP block. IrishLass ( talk) 16:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for all of your help. Vermon CaTaffy 8 ( talk) 21:08, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Why did you change the release back to TBA i just finished listening to the EA conference call and they said that it would be out in 2008 Before the holidays Stu212 ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 23:18, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
I know it's been a while, but I feel that this article should not have been deleted. It was a well-known chain of record stores in the southeastern US--not just a single store.
-- Mister Tog ( talk) 05:12, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
An editor has nominated Jade Raymond, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Raymond and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 02:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Yamla
Excuse me, but pt:Fellowship of Friends has been eliminated in pt.wiki.
Thank you for help Adailton ( talk) 17:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Can admins view pages that have been deleted? I think I heard they can but I'm not sure. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 04:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
See her contribs. Precious Roy ( talk) 10:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Are we approaching critical mass yet? Precious Roy ( talk) 20:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
I've never known of any user with that much contributions!!!-- Damifb ( talk) 16:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
[2] I checked this image when it was added. The licensing template as written says that *any* image on the .net domain is licensed. Only those images on one of the .com domains are restricted to 2001 or earlier. I have reverted the edit on commons, but I thought I would draw this to your attention. If the commons template is misphrased and does not represent the OTRS ticket, that's a different issue. Gimmetrow 17:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi there, I saw you speedy deleted Bingham McCutchen yesterday because of the edits somebody from the company kept making, but I'd like to ask if you could take another look at this article and the history. I seem to remember (although not with certainty) that there was already a perfectly okay start-class article further back in the history, fairly neutral and that, long before the employee(s) came along last week and started meddling with it to get it how they wanted; perhaps it would be better to just revert to the old version. Otherwise, the way I see it, the edits that person kept making have led directly to the complete erasure of an article. If any new editor could come along and edit an article straight into the garbage bin Wikipedia would be in all sorts of trouble! I can't remember exactly what was there but could you take another look, and possibly undelete it at a stable point in the history? • Anakin ( contribs • complaints) 15:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps I misinterpret, but it appears that User:Englandbridge is a sock of User:Tweety21, and IP sock of whose you just blocked. -- Pleasantville ( talk) 01:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Alzano Virescit F.C.. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. CapPixel ( talk) 13:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Yamla, hope you enjoyed your snowboarding/skiing. The closest one I get is in Runcorn!
It must be damn annoying dealing with Tweety21 ( talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log), and I'm willing to make a Wikipedia:Abuse reports/Tweety21 page to deal with this vandal. Hope this helps. -- Solumeiras ( talk) 19:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
She's back on her sock 142.205.212.203 ( talk · contribs) here. Ward3001 ( talk) 01:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Possibly another one as Burke and Hare ( talk · contribs) here. Ward3001 ( talk) 13:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
I've been considering filing a WP:LTA report. Do you think it would be worthwhile? If so, do you think it should go on the main page or as its own page (if you have any experience with LTA—I don't)? Precious Roy ( talk) 17:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
By the way, is the long-term soft-block on User talk:142.205.212.203 still working? If so, I hope that existing accounts under that, such as mine, are not affected. GoldDragon ( talk) 01:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
you revert my "vandalism" is this seriously what you do on vacation —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.174.152 ( talk) 19:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Reverting to my edits for Miley Cyrus on the account Piazzajordan2. My sister found out my account password. And used this. Can i please have another chance. Please unblock me. I will assure you, this will never happen again. thank you. message back. -PiazzaJordan2Replacement —Preceding unsigned comment added by PiazzaJordan2Replacement ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Please explain how "Foz, not sure why you decided to stick your nose in here - but I'd rather an explanation why you ignored Waggers sneering attack on me than some whining rationale for blocking me." is construed as a personal attack meriting sealing my page. Thanks Sarah777 ( talk) 23:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
I can see that User:Dyslexicbudgie has not learnt his lesson. Can you actually block them for like forever and take there user off or sometihng as it is becomeing an issue. Please reply Pattav2 ( talk) 06:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, can you please weigh in on that page? I think it is high time we got rid of those images. Atleast I dont see any new evidence that they're not cpvios. Have you seen any? Please let me know. Thanks. Sarvagnya 17:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
This user whom you blocked for disruptive sockpuppetry for three months on October 26, 2007 is back active again. Not saying he's done anything disruptive as of yet, but you may wish to review. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 14:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Be aware; it's highly likely that User:86.140.29.24 is him as well. No violations as yet, but just so you know. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 15:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
I noticed you had the same format errors as I had on my userpage. I've fixed it for you. Acalamari 17:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Is that a nonsense article? Zenlax T C S 20:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
As someone who had commented on the issue before, would you please weigh in on this discussion. Your input will be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Sarvagnya 23:48, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
You sent me a message saying I was vandalizing the Scarlet Johansson page. All I did was correct the release date of her new album. Someone put it was being released on the 6th- she has publically said it's being released the 20'th. I make this correction and I get a message that I've been vandalizing. - January 31 2008, Samantha555
On the exact reference link used to quote that statement I changed, "Update: Her label has pushed her album back until May 20." You can actually refer to it and see for yourself. So I plead, I was not doing anything wrong, just making the correction that the source itself has recently stated. -February 2 2008, Samantha555 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.205.207.252 ( talk) 09:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Cancergirl ( talk · contribs) may be her latest sock. Ward3001 ( talk) 02:18, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Why don't admins just block the IP address? I thought they did, but they're are still socks of him popping up. Why? -- Alisyn talk 04:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Fine, if you want incorrect sources..then it's your call... Nytemyre ( talk) 23:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Regarding a bit of the lingo regarding sock puppets. When you say that a log is stale, what does that mean? Figured I would ask that way if I am reading through a thing about a user being a sockpuppet or something, I know whats being talked about. Thanks :) Whammies Were Here 23:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello Yamla, User:Popatali is uploading so many images that don't follow Wikipedia guidelines. Look at his/her contributions history. I keep reverting his/her edits but he/she doesn't seem to listen. Furthemore, can you please delete these images: Image:PriyankaChopra.jpg and Image:Kareena Kapoor.jpg since both these images were uploaded from the BollywoodBlog licence. Although they are considered as Wikimedia Commons images, other images from the Bollywood Blog site were Wikimedia Commons images too but they were eventually deleted. -- Bollywood Dreamz Talk 02:59, 5 February 2008
Hello. A user by the name of Ianjones1900 had been indef blocked from Wikipedia for repeatedly adding false info and copyright violations. It looks like he's back, this time with the usernames Ianjones600 and Ianjones457. Will you look into it? I also have suspicions about Ianjones, although he/she has only 5 edits and has been inactive for 18 months. Admc2006 ( talk) 18:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand why you're accusing me of vandalism. All I did was add an image of omar epps to a page on omar epps. I assumed it was an ok image to use since it was already being used on another wikipedia page, I didn't upload it. If I was wrong in doing so, fine, but it was an honest mistake and I don't appreciate you accusing me of intentional wrongdoing. On Thermonuclear War ( talk) 21:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Yamla - thanks for stepping on on that anon-IP page with the unblockabuse template. I didn't know about that and am very happy to find it! I can't believe it's a very-much-used template though -- surely there aren't that many editors that are quite that desperately bored? -- Lquilter ( talk) 22:11, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I was about to decline the request for unblock for User:Whoisthisagain. However, this user has only used the unblock template once, which is hardly abuse of the template. Is your use of the page protection of the user talk page acceptable? If so, let me know for my own administrative education. Archtransit ( talk) 22:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
User talk:Not Something and Not Someone is a sock of Tgannon? I don't dispute the finding but you don't explain why on the user's talk page. Archtransit ( talk) 23:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I was working on Ari Publican before you denied the unblock request. Please leave at least a one sentence explanation on why you believe the person is a sockpuppet. This would be very helpful. Thank you. Archtransit ( talk) 23:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
yes I read it, but as I said, it was an image that was already being used in another wikipedia article. If the image is a violation, shouldn't it have been removed from the other article? Maybe I misinterpreted the message, I'm not saying you were wrong for changing it back, but making a mistake about an image certainly isn't malicious. It just seems like giving me a "final warning" for vandalism over a mistake is kind of severe, considering I've never been warned about it before. On Thermonuclear War ( talk) 23:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
This guy just doesn't give up. He's still blanking talk pages both here and on his IP. Just left word at the intervention page, but I thought you ought to know as well. Thanks for blocking this guy. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 02:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Why bother? A simple IP address change, and we can go on, saying whatever we want. 76.182.32.227 ( talk) 21:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
This [5] might confuse the user even more as he had nothing to do with the I.P. and the original blocking admin reverted the block saying it was an accident. -- NeilN talk ♦ contribs 17:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Calm down, dude. I just added her year of birth which can be checked in the italian (and other) version of the article. There's no need to make such big a deal out of it you know Mitch1981 ( talk) 20:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
If you understand italian, just check this documentary out [6]. It was made by italian channel TG5 and you can see a guy who was her teacher in kindergarten ... in 1968 (so she was definitely not born in 1968), besides the doc clearly states that she was born on the 30th of september 1964. Mitch1981 ( talk) 21:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
What do you have against the magazine covers on the Vogue's article? I can't uderstand your behavior! There's a lot of time that these pictures with Kate Moss and Gisele Bündchen were there! Now are you wanting to take off? What's your objective? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mywikipedista ( talk • contribs) 02:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet. We had additional information not available to the checkusers which ties this to Chadbryant. --Yamla (talk) 22:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
User:Paul Harald Kaspar
I'm curious what type of additional information? I'm interested in improving my detective skills. My e-mail is enabled as is most admins. Archtransit ( talk) 17:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
I didn't see any images uploaded in his log and his deleted contributions were on images uploaded by others. The only contributions I saw were adding category tags to some of the existing images. Was this the person you meant to block? -- NrDg 05:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Yamla. Last week you blocked me for 72 hours for inappropriate edits of mine, which I'll accept were perhaps a little extreme. This time round, I would like to avoid a block, so I would like to know to what extent I am, allowed to point out that I dislike people. If I were to leave a message here now saying "I don't like you", would that be enough to warrant a further block? If so I shall refrain as I wish to be a legitimate editor. 194.189.32.65 ( talk) 11:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Were you not aware that
user:Endlessdan had already been blocked for the comments he made?? What's up with the obvious lack of communication between admins....?? -
ElisaEXPLOSiON
talk.
14:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I thought that as they are now redundant pages (misunderstandings) I could redirect them to my page to prevent any more confusions- believe me, there have been plenty! Can I revert? Thanks, Btline ( talk) 17:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Btline ( talk) 17:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
:::You may also want to add {{User Alternate Acc|Dewarw}} to your userpage. --~~~~
No need. Btline ( talk) 18:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm the author, I did the picture all by myself! This is my name! —Preceding unsigned comment added by FireOcean ( talk • contribs) 02:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
A French friend called Cyrril Perrin did the pic on my own camera! —Preceding unsigned comment added by FireOcean ( talk • contribs) 02:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
What can I say? Sometimes I can be an impatient man. Thanks a lot.
Do I get to move that auto-block removal notice to a sub-page of my own (for archival purposes) or just outright remove it? I've always wondered about stuff like that. Casull ( talk) 04:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm rather confused.
Universal Hero ( talk) 11:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Response on my talk. -- Elliskev 15:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Can you block Wikone ( talk · contribs) for 5 minutes? So he will learn about the BC -BCE thing. -- helics ( talk · contribs) 17:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Yamla, you blocked Helics ( talk · contribs) as an abusive sockpuppet of Iamandrewrice ( talk · contribs) and he is now requesting to be unblocked. Unless I'm overlooking the account, Helics doesn't appear to be listed on Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Iamandrewrice and they don't appear to have edited any of the same pages. Am I missing something obvious (it is awfully early in the morning)? - auburnpilot talk 13:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Zenlax is wishing you a
Happy Valentine's Day, {{subst:kdBASEPAGENAME}}! This greeting promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the love by adding {{ subst: User:Flaminglawyer/HapValDay!}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Zenlax T C S 19:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
The block that you added to 88.108.0.0/17 also includes my IP, 88.108.83.0. I would add further comment to that but since it expires in less than 10 hours, which I intend on spending either logged in or in bed, I don't see a point any further than pointing out that that particular IP isn't Iamandrewrice. Have a nice day =). — Balthazar ( T| C) 01:46, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
To make a quality encyclopedia article, I think this image is necessary. The earlier version was not good. (you may compare both). I’ve mentioned in the image talk page also. Hope this ok. Thanks. -- Avinesh Jose T 05:34, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I don't know if you're aware of the situation or not, but this is a long-standing and overall positive contributor. I (the blocking admin) and a number of other admins have considered an apology and/or promise not to vandalize anymore to be a sufficient but necessary condition for unblock. - Revolving Bugbear 20:35, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Could you please unlock the Giovanni De Prà page, so I could create an article about him? Thanks! Gh ( talk) 16:09, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Can a cool admin help a guy out? I want to add one sentence to the world of Wikipedia. But I can't. The sentence is factual, provable, reliable (I chose the New York Times version.)
Circumcision may decrease a man's risk of getting HIV but it may also INCREASE a man's risk of getting herpes and chlamydia. (and some doctors even say other STD's too but I won't get into that and I wouldn't put caps on INCREASE.)
The article on circumcision mentions the term HIV probably 100 times (I'm not joking) and mentions "herpes" or "chlamydia" not Once. Click on the article. You tell me if it's an article on the procedure or a pro-circumcision propaganda pamphlet.
Can a cool admin stop two guys named Avraham and Jakew (the site's dictators) from deleting my one sentence I want to add? Or possibly get new Admins to take over this article, which has fallen way below Wikipedia standards.
here's the New York Times piece... http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9C07E4D91F3AF931A35757C0A961958260&fta=y
I used to love Wikipedia until I went to add a sentence, you know? Well, thanks. 70.114.38.167 ( talk) 07:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Randy Jaiyan ( talk · contribs) is moving multiple pages, adding more illegal images, and being a general pain. He was blocked by Daniel Case for the pictures earlier but you blocked him last weekend for incivility. Could you help again. He's created a bunch of pages and then redirected them. He's even moved actress pages, not just fictional characters. Any help is appreciated. KellyAna ( talk) 14:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Instead of keep on adding copyvio of my images in my talk page, could you please see the contribution of my images & keep on delete it. Please don’t add the notification in my talk page as it looks awkward to me. I already put it in my watch list of all image uploading details & every change would be notified immediately to me. So go ahead & delete all my images. No problem at all. Wish you all the best. Thanks. -- Avinesh Jose T 05:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | → | Archive 20 |
I edited right behind you and did not see your response to 67.18.217.74 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) until after I posted. We are blocking an entire hosting company? What if the individual ip is not an open proxy any longer? Just asking because I don't know -- hoping for enlightenment. Thanks! - JodyB talk 16:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
i have a new account which is peterparker 3000 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterparker3000 ( talk • contribs) 03:43, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
In another one of his incarnations, User:MaryPoppins878 his is continuing to abuse his unblock privileges since you blocked the Grant page. Could you do the same for the MaryPoppins page at your convenience? Thank you. IrishLass ( talk) 14:40, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
User:Vicmm42 is back. First step was to re-upload the image you had deleted after blocking him, and re-insert it into Lindsay Lohan. Kww ( talk) 03:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
One of the mouseketeers, quickly heading towards the side of evil. You know she has been a constant source of light trouble on the Ashley Tisdale stuff, mainly for putting in unsourced stuff. Now she's graduated to creating apparently imaginary albums, like De Repente and Raven-Symoné (album). Trouble is, I don't think she's really a vandal. I think she's a Brazilian high-school kid that doesn't quite understand why everything she does gets deleted. Is there a way to find a Portuguese-speaking admin that can have a little chat with her and put her back on the straight-and-narrow? Kww ( talk) 03:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
This was archived while you were away, just wanted to make sure you saw it. In another one of his incarnations, User:MaryPoppins878 his is continuing to abuse his unblock privileges since you blocked the Grant page. Could you do the same for the MaryPoppins page at your convenience? Thank you. IrishLass ( talk) 16:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Helo Yamla
please, add [[pt:Fellowship of Friends]] in Fellowship of Friends.
Thanks Adailton ( talk) 20:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Yamla, Happy New Year! A user with multiple IP addresses is vandalising the article on Tashan. Please take a look at the history of the page. The user has used these IP addresses to vandalise the page: 117.198.146.102, 117.198.144.236, 117.198.146.31, 117.198.145.176 and 117.198.145.82. Note the first eight digits is the same in all the addresses (117.198.14). I don't know what to do as the user will continue to use multiple IP addresses to add it bac again. I am getting sick of vandalising it over and over again. -- Bollywood Dreamz Talk 03:26, 4 January 2008
Hi Yamla, was wondering if you could please take a look at the discussion currently taking place at Thriller 25, specifically this thread)? There is a debate about whether or not this article should be merged with Thriller (album) (I am a part of this discussion). Whatever the outcome of the consensus is not a huge deal to me personally, but I am concerned about possible WP:OWN issues by a specific editor whose most recent comment is "you WILL NOT make Thriller 25 small enough to merge and you WILL NOT make Thriller smaller without a consensus that it actually needs to be". I'm afraid that whatever what the outcome, this user will plow forward with his/her preferred version no matter what, and since I am directly involved with this I feel it would benefit all involved parties to have a neutral person check in. One thing I do not want to do is overstep any boundaries here. Thanks in advance. - eo ( talk) 22:26, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Check out the user Udonknome- I find it highly suspicious that he's editing both Italian soccer articles and music articles, much like Soprani, and his first edit was in the same period as the blocking. Just something I noticed. Thanks. Monsieurdl mon talk- mon contribs 22:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Yamla, I am requesting that you undo your partial revert here. Keeping this imaged tagged for deletion due to it's orphan status advances one side in a dispute which caused an edit war and flies in the face of the spirit of page protection which is to allow time for a consensus to form. Relavent threads you might want to note can be seen here at ANI and here at AN I urge you to reconsider. Thanks, R. Baley ( talk) 20:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Yamla, I hope that all is well. I suspect that Cpzphantom is making disruptive edits once again now under another sockpuppet ("Cocoliras"). This new user keeps making the same type of disruptive edits. Could you please take a look?-- Schonbrunn ( talk) 16:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
41.241.48.7 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) can you block him, please. His first edit was to Days of our Lives. I thought there was a range IP block. IrishLass ( talk) 16:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for all of your help. Vermon CaTaffy 8 ( talk) 21:08, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Why did you change the release back to TBA i just finished listening to the EA conference call and they said that it would be out in 2008 Before the holidays Stu212 ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 23:18, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
I know it's been a while, but I feel that this article should not have been deleted. It was a well-known chain of record stores in the southeastern US--not just a single store.
-- Mister Tog ( talk) 05:12, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
An editor has nominated Jade Raymond, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Raymond and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 02:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello Yamla
Excuse me, but pt:Fellowship of Friends has been eliminated in pt.wiki.
Thank you for help Adailton ( talk) 17:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Can admins view pages that have been deleted? I think I heard they can but I'm not sure. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 04:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
See her contribs. Precious Roy ( talk) 10:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Are we approaching critical mass yet? Precious Roy ( talk) 20:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
I've never known of any user with that much contributions!!!-- Damifb ( talk) 16:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
[2] I checked this image when it was added. The licensing template as written says that *any* image on the .net domain is licensed. Only those images on one of the .com domains are restricted to 2001 or earlier. I have reverted the edit on commons, but I thought I would draw this to your attention. If the commons template is misphrased and does not represent the OTRS ticket, that's a different issue. Gimmetrow 17:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi there, I saw you speedy deleted Bingham McCutchen yesterday because of the edits somebody from the company kept making, but I'd like to ask if you could take another look at this article and the history. I seem to remember (although not with certainty) that there was already a perfectly okay start-class article further back in the history, fairly neutral and that, long before the employee(s) came along last week and started meddling with it to get it how they wanted; perhaps it would be better to just revert to the old version. Otherwise, the way I see it, the edits that person kept making have led directly to the complete erasure of an article. If any new editor could come along and edit an article straight into the garbage bin Wikipedia would be in all sorts of trouble! I can't remember exactly what was there but could you take another look, and possibly undelete it at a stable point in the history? • Anakin ( contribs • complaints) 15:25, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps I misinterpret, but it appears that User:Englandbridge is a sock of User:Tweety21, and IP sock of whose you just blocked. -- Pleasantville ( talk) 01:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Alzano Virescit F.C.. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. CapPixel ( talk) 13:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Yamla, hope you enjoyed your snowboarding/skiing. The closest one I get is in Runcorn!
It must be damn annoying dealing with Tweety21 ( talk · contribs · count · logs · page moves · block log), and I'm willing to make a Wikipedia:Abuse reports/Tweety21 page to deal with this vandal. Hope this helps. -- Solumeiras ( talk) 19:45, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
She's back on her sock 142.205.212.203 ( talk · contribs) here. Ward3001 ( talk) 01:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Possibly another one as Burke and Hare ( talk · contribs) here. Ward3001 ( talk) 13:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
I've been considering filing a WP:LTA report. Do you think it would be worthwhile? If so, do you think it should go on the main page or as its own page (if you have any experience with LTA—I don't)? Precious Roy ( talk) 17:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
By the way, is the long-term soft-block on User talk:142.205.212.203 still working? If so, I hope that existing accounts under that, such as mine, are not affected. GoldDragon ( talk) 01:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
you revert my "vandalism" is this seriously what you do on vacation —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.174.152 ( talk) 19:39, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Reverting to my edits for Miley Cyrus on the account Piazzajordan2. My sister found out my account password. And used this. Can i please have another chance. Please unblock me. I will assure you, this will never happen again. thank you. message back. -PiazzaJordan2Replacement —Preceding unsigned comment added by PiazzaJordan2Replacement ( talk • contribs) 19:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Please explain how "Foz, not sure why you decided to stick your nose in here - but I'd rather an explanation why you ignored Waggers sneering attack on me than some whining rationale for blocking me." is construed as a personal attack meriting sealing my page. Thanks Sarah777 ( talk) 23:45, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
I can see that User:Dyslexicbudgie has not learnt his lesson. Can you actually block them for like forever and take there user off or sometihng as it is becomeing an issue. Please reply Pattav2 ( talk) 06:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, can you please weigh in on that page? I think it is high time we got rid of those images. Atleast I dont see any new evidence that they're not cpvios. Have you seen any? Please let me know. Thanks. Sarvagnya 17:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
This user whom you blocked for disruptive sockpuppetry for three months on October 26, 2007 is back active again. Not saying he's done anything disruptive as of yet, but you may wish to review. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 14:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Be aware; it's highly likely that User:86.140.29.24 is him as well. No violations as yet, but just so you know. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 15:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
I noticed you had the same format errors as I had on my userpage. I've fixed it for you. Acalamari 17:41, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Is that a nonsense article? Zenlax T C S 20:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
As someone who had commented on the issue before, would you please weigh in on this discussion. Your input will be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Sarvagnya 23:48, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
You sent me a message saying I was vandalizing the Scarlet Johansson page. All I did was correct the release date of her new album. Someone put it was being released on the 6th- she has publically said it's being released the 20'th. I make this correction and I get a message that I've been vandalizing. - January 31 2008, Samantha555
On the exact reference link used to quote that statement I changed, "Update: Her label has pushed her album back until May 20." You can actually refer to it and see for yourself. So I plead, I was not doing anything wrong, just making the correction that the source itself has recently stated. -February 2 2008, Samantha555 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.205.207.252 ( talk) 09:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Cancergirl ( talk · contribs) may be her latest sock. Ward3001 ( talk) 02:18, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Why don't admins just block the IP address? I thought they did, but they're are still socks of him popping up. Why? -- Alisyn talk 04:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Fine, if you want incorrect sources..then it's your call... Nytemyre ( talk) 23:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Regarding a bit of the lingo regarding sock puppets. When you say that a log is stale, what does that mean? Figured I would ask that way if I am reading through a thing about a user being a sockpuppet or something, I know whats being talked about. Thanks :) Whammies Were Here 23:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello Yamla, User:Popatali is uploading so many images that don't follow Wikipedia guidelines. Look at his/her contributions history. I keep reverting his/her edits but he/she doesn't seem to listen. Furthemore, can you please delete these images: Image:PriyankaChopra.jpg and Image:Kareena Kapoor.jpg since both these images were uploaded from the BollywoodBlog licence. Although they are considered as Wikimedia Commons images, other images from the Bollywood Blog site were Wikimedia Commons images too but they were eventually deleted. -- Bollywood Dreamz Talk 02:59, 5 February 2008
Hello. A user by the name of Ianjones1900 had been indef blocked from Wikipedia for repeatedly adding false info and copyright violations. It looks like he's back, this time with the usernames Ianjones600 and Ianjones457. Will you look into it? I also have suspicions about Ianjones, although he/she has only 5 edits and has been inactive for 18 months. Admc2006 ( talk) 18:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand why you're accusing me of vandalism. All I did was add an image of omar epps to a page on omar epps. I assumed it was an ok image to use since it was already being used on another wikipedia page, I didn't upload it. If I was wrong in doing so, fine, but it was an honest mistake and I don't appreciate you accusing me of intentional wrongdoing. On Thermonuclear War ( talk) 21:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Yamla - thanks for stepping on on that anon-IP page with the unblockabuse template. I didn't know about that and am very happy to find it! I can't believe it's a very-much-used template though -- surely there aren't that many editors that are quite that desperately bored? -- Lquilter ( talk) 22:11, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I was about to decline the request for unblock for User:Whoisthisagain. However, this user has only used the unblock template once, which is hardly abuse of the template. Is your use of the page protection of the user talk page acceptable? If so, let me know for my own administrative education. Archtransit ( talk) 22:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
User talk:Not Something and Not Someone is a sock of Tgannon? I don't dispute the finding but you don't explain why on the user's talk page. Archtransit ( talk) 23:04, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
I was working on Ari Publican before you denied the unblock request. Please leave at least a one sentence explanation on why you believe the person is a sockpuppet. This would be very helpful. Thank you. Archtransit ( talk) 23:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
yes I read it, but as I said, it was an image that was already being used in another wikipedia article. If the image is a violation, shouldn't it have been removed from the other article? Maybe I misinterpreted the message, I'm not saying you were wrong for changing it back, but making a mistake about an image certainly isn't malicious. It just seems like giving me a "final warning" for vandalism over a mistake is kind of severe, considering I've never been warned about it before. On Thermonuclear War ( talk) 23:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
This guy just doesn't give up. He's still blanking talk pages both here and on his IP. Just left word at the intervention page, but I thought you ought to know as well. Thanks for blocking this guy. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 02:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Why bother? A simple IP address change, and we can go on, saying whatever we want. 76.182.32.227 ( talk) 21:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
This [5] might confuse the user even more as he had nothing to do with the I.P. and the original blocking admin reverted the block saying it was an accident. -- NeilN talk ♦ contribs 17:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Calm down, dude. I just added her year of birth which can be checked in the italian (and other) version of the article. There's no need to make such big a deal out of it you know Mitch1981 ( talk) 20:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
If you understand italian, just check this documentary out [6]. It was made by italian channel TG5 and you can see a guy who was her teacher in kindergarten ... in 1968 (so she was definitely not born in 1968), besides the doc clearly states that she was born on the 30th of september 1964. Mitch1981 ( talk) 21:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
What do you have against the magazine covers on the Vogue's article? I can't uderstand your behavior! There's a lot of time that these pictures with Kate Moss and Gisele Bündchen were there! Now are you wanting to take off? What's your objective? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mywikipedista ( talk • contribs) 02:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet. We had additional information not available to the checkusers which ties this to Chadbryant. --Yamla (talk) 22:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
User:Paul Harald Kaspar
I'm curious what type of additional information? I'm interested in improving my detective skills. My e-mail is enabled as is most admins. Archtransit ( talk) 17:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
I didn't see any images uploaded in his log and his deleted contributions were on images uploaded by others. The only contributions I saw were adding category tags to some of the existing images. Was this the person you meant to block? -- NrDg 05:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Yamla. Last week you blocked me for 72 hours for inappropriate edits of mine, which I'll accept were perhaps a little extreme. This time round, I would like to avoid a block, so I would like to know to what extent I am, allowed to point out that I dislike people. If I were to leave a message here now saying "I don't like you", would that be enough to warrant a further block? If so I shall refrain as I wish to be a legitimate editor. 194.189.32.65 ( talk) 11:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Were you not aware that
user:Endlessdan had already been blocked for the comments he made?? What's up with the obvious lack of communication between admins....?? -
ElisaEXPLOSiON
talk.
14:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I thought that as they are now redundant pages (misunderstandings) I could redirect them to my page to prevent any more confusions- believe me, there have been plenty! Can I revert? Thanks, Btline ( talk) 17:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Btline ( talk) 17:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
:::You may also want to add {{User Alternate Acc|Dewarw}} to your userpage. --~~~~
No need. Btline ( talk) 18:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm the author, I did the picture all by myself! This is my name! —Preceding unsigned comment added by FireOcean ( talk • contribs) 02:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
A French friend called Cyrril Perrin did the pic on my own camera! —Preceding unsigned comment added by FireOcean ( talk • contribs) 02:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
What can I say? Sometimes I can be an impatient man. Thanks a lot.
Do I get to move that auto-block removal notice to a sub-page of my own (for archival purposes) or just outright remove it? I've always wondered about stuff like that. Casull ( talk) 04:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I'm rather confused.
Universal Hero ( talk) 11:02, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Response on my talk. -- Elliskev 15:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Can you block Wikone ( talk · contribs) for 5 minutes? So he will learn about the BC -BCE thing. -- helics ( talk · contribs) 17:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Yamla, you blocked Helics ( talk · contribs) as an abusive sockpuppet of Iamandrewrice ( talk · contribs) and he is now requesting to be unblocked. Unless I'm overlooking the account, Helics doesn't appear to be listed on Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Iamandrewrice and they don't appear to have edited any of the same pages. Am I missing something obvious (it is awfully early in the morning)? - auburnpilot talk 13:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Zenlax is wishing you a
Happy Valentine's Day, {{subst:kdBASEPAGENAME}}! This greeting promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Spread the love by adding {{ subst: User:Flaminglawyer/HapValDay!}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Zenlax T C S 19:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
The block that you added to 88.108.0.0/17 also includes my IP, 88.108.83.0. I would add further comment to that but since it expires in less than 10 hours, which I intend on spending either logged in or in bed, I don't see a point any further than pointing out that that particular IP isn't Iamandrewrice. Have a nice day =). — Balthazar ( T| C) 01:46, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
To make a quality encyclopedia article, I think this image is necessary. The earlier version was not good. (you may compare both). I’ve mentioned in the image talk page also. Hope this ok. Thanks. -- Avinesh Jose T 05:34, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
I don't know if you're aware of the situation or not, but this is a long-standing and overall positive contributor. I (the blocking admin) and a number of other admins have considered an apology and/or promise not to vandalize anymore to be a sufficient but necessary condition for unblock. - Revolving Bugbear 20:35, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Could you please unlock the Giovanni De Prà page, so I could create an article about him? Thanks! Gh ( talk) 16:09, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Can a cool admin help a guy out? I want to add one sentence to the world of Wikipedia. But I can't. The sentence is factual, provable, reliable (I chose the New York Times version.)
Circumcision may decrease a man's risk of getting HIV but it may also INCREASE a man's risk of getting herpes and chlamydia. (and some doctors even say other STD's too but I won't get into that and I wouldn't put caps on INCREASE.)
The article on circumcision mentions the term HIV probably 100 times (I'm not joking) and mentions "herpes" or "chlamydia" not Once. Click on the article. You tell me if it's an article on the procedure or a pro-circumcision propaganda pamphlet.
Can a cool admin stop two guys named Avraham and Jakew (the site's dictators) from deleting my one sentence I want to add? Or possibly get new Admins to take over this article, which has fallen way below Wikipedia standards.
here's the New York Times piece... http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9C07E4D91F3AF931A35757C0A961958260&fta=y
I used to love Wikipedia until I went to add a sentence, you know? Well, thanks. 70.114.38.167 ( talk) 07:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Randy Jaiyan ( talk · contribs) is moving multiple pages, adding more illegal images, and being a general pain. He was blocked by Daniel Case for the pictures earlier but you blocked him last weekend for incivility. Could you help again. He's created a bunch of pages and then redirected them. He's even moved actress pages, not just fictional characters. Any help is appreciated. KellyAna ( talk) 14:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Instead of keep on adding copyvio of my images in my talk page, could you please see the contribution of my images & keep on delete it. Please don’t add the notification in my talk page as it looks awkward to me. I already put it in my watch list of all image uploading details & every change would be notified immediately to me. So go ahead & delete all my images. No problem at all. Wish you all the best. Thanks. -- Avinesh Jose T 05:00, 18 February 2008 (UTC)