![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Talk page • Archive 1 • Archive 2 • Archive 3 • Archive 4 • Archive 5 • Archive 6 • Archive 7 • Archive 8 • Archive 9
Hi ww2, i'm not sure if this is the right place to ask but i notice you edited my addition to the 'puca' page. my reason for adding a "see also; Poulaphouca" note was because i'm pretty sure the name 'poulaphouca' is translated as 'hole of the puca'. i'm not 100% sure but i just thought it was worthy of adding to the poulaphouca page. oh well. if you get the time could you email me at jimmmypeas@gmail.com. i would just be interested as to how to go about adding things legitimately. thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.100.250.230 ( talk) 23:26, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Please see my post at User_talk:Rlandmann ( Centpacrr ( talk) 01:59, 3 July 2008 (UTC))
Thank you for the discrete and civil way you edited my contribution article Finbar Wright. Any help is greatly appreciated. I need advice in cleaning up a tag on self-same Discussion page - After editing and cleaning up content who do I write to have the BLP-deletion tag removed. Again thank you, Walknnirishrain 14:08 3 July 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Walknnirishrain ( talk • contribs) 18:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Ww2, just wanted to let you know about this. I'm not going to tackle it myself, but I though it was worth mentioning to you, at least. Regards, Ceoil sláinte 18:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
Could you explain why you remove the link [1] I just put on the Postal code page ? This website is very useful to find a postcode, there is no other page like this on the internet (if you know one, tell me). Fred. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.247.186.85 ( talk • contribs) (10:49, 13 July 2008)
User:Sennen goroshi just followed me on to this article and reverted to make a point because I had reverted him on another article. Editor has IMO no real interest in improving the article. BigDunc Talk 18:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
-- Gatoclass ( talk) 12:42, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
You know what's funny?
a)I work for Wisdom publications and have the right to use whatever words I want to from our books.
b)That you are from Ireland and have basically stopped me from creating a wiki page for one of the great Irish women in the last fifty years. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jimmywebber (
talk •
contribs) 13:03, 19 July 2008
Discussion moved to to the Franking talk page to reach a wider, more interested audience. ww2censor ( talk) 03:58, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Moved discussion to Airmail talk page. ww2censor ( talk) 03:52, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 15:14, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 18:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads-up, WW2censor. I will get right on it. :) - Hexhand ( talk) 21:26, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I was mucking around with this Postal Administration thing and when I went to the An Post article to gain some insight into how postal operators might be characterized, I found the article contained the following phase: An Post provides a universal postal service to all parts of the Republic of Ireland and is a member of the Universal Postal Union. If I remember my International Law correctly, I don't think that An Post or any other postal agency is a member of the treaty organization UPU. Ireland is the member state (Ireland signed the treaty) and An Post is just part of Ireland's Postal Administration which is governed by the UPC conventions. Do you think my interpretation is correct?-- Mike Cline ( talk) 19:23, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 23:58, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. I think I ought to have more than enough prose now without disrupting my good standard of sources. :) -- Candlewicke Consortiums Limited 11:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I see an anon IP keeps adding to the Dublin article on the record rainfall at Dublin Airport for August. I'd already posted a question on Talk about this. I've included a reference from the RTE news report. But I'm not sure if we want to add it anyway...any thoughts? -- HighKing ( talk) 16:48, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Ww2Censor - I posted a question here about list inclusion criteria. Any thoughts??-- Mike Cline ( talk) 13:29, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Under Wiki Rules user names should not give an impression of authority which is unwarranted. The name you have chosen which includes the word "Censor" contravenes wiki rules. Please change your name - You have been advised of this conflict before and have chosen to ignore advisories - even as a self declared censor you are not beyond Wiki rules - please sort this out 83.71.80.104 ( talk) 06:43, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
It's on the Main Page now. :) Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Candlewicke ( talk • contribs) 08:50, 19 August 2008
Image:Irl-BrittasBay.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Brittas Bay.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Brittas Bay.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 13:56, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I don't understand, I don't see the answer of your talk page, can you tell me please, thank you. Russian Luxembourger ( talk) 21:59, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
The sources I mentioned are bono fide--as well as consulting my own books, I did a cross-check online and the only one at variance was the Independent article, but I don't know what, if any, research the writer did. It appears certain that the original designs were drawn up by William Wilkins, and that Francis Johnston was brought in at some stage. He may have been the project manager (or the equivalent at the time). Some of Johnston's drawings differed from the finished pillar. I have a number of other books about Dublin and can check them to see whether there is any further information to be found.
I have a little more information about the planning for the pillar, which was initiated by the Mayor of the time, and was planning to put it up sometime this week. I only add information that I've checked myself against a book or, occasionally, an online article. Hohenloh ( talk) 18:17, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
I have reverted a number of pages vandalised (that's the only way I can describe it) by 81.157.22.121, just as you did for Dublin. Is anyone watching these pages? Hohenloh ( talk) 04:16, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi ww2. I was wondering if you might check back in Wikipedia:Featured article review/History of Limerick. Any plans to still work on it? If not, no worries. Just let us know. Marskell ( talk) 08:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
...on my talk page, but perhaps there's something you could help me with. At the bottom of Lord High Treasurer of Ireland, you can see a list of commissioners of that office, taken from Haydn's Book of Dignities. Unfortunately, the list is clearly defective; there is no "George, Earl of Ross" who can be identified with that period, for instance. The commissions do not appear to have ever been Gazetted; do you know of any better source for these commissioners? Choess ( talk) 00:53, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I'm afraid I can't recall the whys and wherefores but the two categories do look the same so I would go ahead and merge. Best wishes. BlackJack | talk page 05:21, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
I note your concern about the source I quoted on the Dunlavin page. When I read the "blog", it seemed to me to be researched (sources are mentioned although not formally cited) and the author, Chris Lawlor, rang no alarm bells as having axes to grind; just an interested amateur historian whose efforts warrant a wider audience and scrutiny. I intended to use "facts" not interpretations. Having read the verifiability policy it seems that my approach (using the best available sources and comparing them) is flawed (although the "blog" is more of a personal website). I am left with the problem that many web based sources can be similarly ruled out, despite the fact that it can be difficult to obtain a comparable level of detail. Others are clearly in the same boat, since the "RailScot" site cited also appears to be a personal website. Folks at 137 ( talk) 09:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I congratulate you on having successfully cut and pasted an official list. But it is not our policy to copy such lists; it would be closer to say that it wasn't; that adds no information that an external link would not have provided. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
i did not vandalse no ones page was just responding back to what that person wrote on my page. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ford1206 ( talk • contribs) 13:30, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestion. I didn't know about this so I've "nominated" as much to try it out as with serious expectation of success. Thanks for the thought: slightly chuffed that you thought it was worth it. Folks at 137 ( talk) 17:55, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
I think I explained, in some detail, the last time you posed this question, exactly why that "source" for Michael Stapleton no longer applies. I'm not going to repeat myself, except to say that Michael Stapleton was long dead before the work attributed to him in Dennis's book was carried out, and it was carried out by his son, George. Please refer to my edits of the "Chapel Royal". Hohenloh ( talk) 15:40, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Please see the first "Michael Stapleton" section on my talk page. Hohenloh ( talk) 15:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi ww2censor, I saw your note on the Genesis page about using blogs as sources -- or not, as I am well aware that blogs are discouraged in general, and I fully support the guideline. In the case of AutoBlog, however, I understand that it has an editorial structure (similar to its sister site Engadget) which makes it more like a traditional news source than a blog, and is considered an important industry source. Additionally, they prominently display a corrections form, which indicates that they value accuracy. Thoughts? NMS Bill ( talk) 17:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
re [2] Note that WP:MOSFLAG (not WP:FLAG incidentally) only specifically deprecates flags in infoboxes for place of birth and death, it's generally being held that using them for something like the allegiance of a military figure, and the specific service to which they belonged can be a useful usage, see Wikipedia:MILMOS#Flag icons. David Underdown ( talk) 11:34, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 03:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello there. While I accept I am close to breaking 3RR, I have not done so yet - as you stated in this edit. I don't want to be a dick here, but I just felt that, when combined with your template on my talk, it was a bit rude. Again, I don't want to be a dick, and I don't expect an apology, I'm just saying is all. Thanks! Fin © ™ 15:44, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Ww2Censor:
I had recently stumbled across the Commons image of someone's Argentine postage stamp collection and, though the Flickr uploader should've probably scanned the stamps individually, I thought it might be a nice touch
I edited out a couple of typos (accents and the like) and added a reference where the original editor had overlooked. You seem to be a knowledgeable stamp collector; is it bad form to put up an image of multiple stamps? If so, I'll leave it alone; otherwise, I'm sure the image would be informative to those who had never seen Argentine postage and evocative to Argentines who might recall a fond memory or two.
I look forward to your thoughts.
Sincerely, 76.174.124.198 ( talk) 22:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 03:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Response for you on my talk page. -- Non-dropframe ( talk) 00:40, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Having read over [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ireland#Flag_of_Ireland_2 the discussion] on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ireland on the recent move and the concerns expressed, I have begun a move request on the flag. Your comments would be welcome here.-- Domer48 'fenian' 19:12, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Like in pakistani mountains it states disputed it should also say this on indian mountains unless you want me to remove the indian claims from pakistani mountains you should accept that indian mountains are also disputed 81.151.100.255 ( talk) 21:56, 25 October 2008 (UTC) Also in k6 it clearly states it is disputed it should say the same on other indian mountains like nun kun why do you have POV against pakistan ?? 81.151.100.255 ( talk) 21:59, 25 October 2008 (UTC) i await your response with patience then 81.151.100.255 ( talk) 22:06, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Most articles just have the dates in brackets not the places - for example Franklin D. Roosevelt. Paul Austin ( talk) 16:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Talk page • Archive 1 • Archive 2 • Archive 3 • Archive 4 • Archive 5 • Archive 6 • Archive 7 • Archive 8 • Archive 9
Hi ww2, i'm not sure if this is the right place to ask but i notice you edited my addition to the 'puca' page. my reason for adding a "see also; Poulaphouca" note was because i'm pretty sure the name 'poulaphouca' is translated as 'hole of the puca'. i'm not 100% sure but i just thought it was worthy of adding to the poulaphouca page. oh well. if you get the time could you email me at jimmmypeas@gmail.com. i would just be interested as to how to go about adding things legitimately. thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.100.250.230 ( talk) 23:26, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Please see my post at User_talk:Rlandmann ( Centpacrr ( talk) 01:59, 3 July 2008 (UTC))
Thank you for the discrete and civil way you edited my contribution article Finbar Wright. Any help is greatly appreciated. I need advice in cleaning up a tag on self-same Discussion page - After editing and cleaning up content who do I write to have the BLP-deletion tag removed. Again thank you, Walknnirishrain 14:08 3 July 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Walknnirishrain ( talk • contribs) 18:08, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Ww2, just wanted to let you know about this. I'm not going to tackle it myself, but I though it was worth mentioning to you, at least. Regards, Ceoil sláinte 18:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
Could you explain why you remove the link [1] I just put on the Postal code page ? This website is very useful to find a postcode, there is no other page like this on the internet (if you know one, tell me). Fred. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.247.186.85 ( talk • contribs) (10:49, 13 July 2008)
User:Sennen goroshi just followed me on to this article and reverted to make a point because I had reverted him on another article. Editor has IMO no real interest in improving the article. BigDunc Talk 18:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
-- Gatoclass ( talk) 12:42, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
You know what's funny?
a)I work for Wisdom publications and have the right to use whatever words I want to from our books.
b)That you are from Ireland and have basically stopped me from creating a wiki page for one of the great Irish women in the last fifty years. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Jimmywebber (
talk •
contribs) 13:03, 19 July 2008
Discussion moved to to the Franking talk page to reach a wider, more interested audience. ww2censor ( talk) 03:58, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Moved discussion to Airmail talk page. ww2censor ( talk) 03:52, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 15:14, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 18:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads-up, WW2censor. I will get right on it. :) - Hexhand ( talk) 21:26, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
I was mucking around with this Postal Administration thing and when I went to the An Post article to gain some insight into how postal operators might be characterized, I found the article contained the following phase: An Post provides a universal postal service to all parts of the Republic of Ireland and is a member of the Universal Postal Union. If I remember my International Law correctly, I don't think that An Post or any other postal agency is a member of the treaty organization UPU. Ireland is the member state (Ireland signed the treaty) and An Post is just part of Ireland's Postal Administration which is governed by the UPC conventions. Do you think my interpretation is correct?-- Mike Cline ( talk) 19:23, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
--Congratulations! PeterSymonds (talk) 23:58, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. I think I ought to have more than enough prose now without disrupting my good standard of sources. :) -- Candlewicke Consortiums Limited 11:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I see an anon IP keeps adding to the Dublin article on the record rainfall at Dublin Airport for August. I'd already posted a question on Talk about this. I've included a reference from the RTE news report. But I'm not sure if we want to add it anyway...any thoughts? -- HighKing ( talk) 16:48, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Ww2Censor - I posted a question here about list inclusion criteria. Any thoughts??-- Mike Cline ( talk) 13:29, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Under Wiki Rules user names should not give an impression of authority which is unwarranted. The name you have chosen which includes the word "Censor" contravenes wiki rules. Please change your name - You have been advised of this conflict before and have chosen to ignore advisories - even as a self declared censor you are not beyond Wiki rules - please sort this out 83.71.80.104 ( talk) 06:43, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
It's on the Main Page now. :) Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Candlewicke ( talk • contribs) 08:50, 19 August 2008
Image:Irl-BrittasBay.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Brittas Bay.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Brittas Bay.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 13:56, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I don't understand, I don't see the answer of your talk page, can you tell me please, thank you. Russian Luxembourger ( talk) 21:59, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
The sources I mentioned are bono fide--as well as consulting my own books, I did a cross-check online and the only one at variance was the Independent article, but I don't know what, if any, research the writer did. It appears certain that the original designs were drawn up by William Wilkins, and that Francis Johnston was brought in at some stage. He may have been the project manager (or the equivalent at the time). Some of Johnston's drawings differed from the finished pillar. I have a number of other books about Dublin and can check them to see whether there is any further information to be found.
I have a little more information about the planning for the pillar, which was initiated by the Mayor of the time, and was planning to put it up sometime this week. I only add information that I've checked myself against a book or, occasionally, an online article. Hohenloh ( talk) 18:17, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
I have reverted a number of pages vandalised (that's the only way I can describe it) by 81.157.22.121, just as you did for Dublin. Is anyone watching these pages? Hohenloh ( talk) 04:16, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi ww2. I was wondering if you might check back in Wikipedia:Featured article review/History of Limerick. Any plans to still work on it? If not, no worries. Just let us know. Marskell ( talk) 08:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
...on my talk page, but perhaps there's something you could help me with. At the bottom of Lord High Treasurer of Ireland, you can see a list of commissioners of that office, taken from Haydn's Book of Dignities. Unfortunately, the list is clearly defective; there is no "George, Earl of Ross" who can be identified with that period, for instance. The commissions do not appear to have ever been Gazetted; do you know of any better source for these commissioners? Choess ( talk) 00:53, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I'm afraid I can't recall the whys and wherefores but the two categories do look the same so I would go ahead and merge. Best wishes. BlackJack | talk page 05:21, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
I note your concern about the source I quoted on the Dunlavin page. When I read the "blog", it seemed to me to be researched (sources are mentioned although not formally cited) and the author, Chris Lawlor, rang no alarm bells as having axes to grind; just an interested amateur historian whose efforts warrant a wider audience and scrutiny. I intended to use "facts" not interpretations. Having read the verifiability policy it seems that my approach (using the best available sources and comparing them) is flawed (although the "blog" is more of a personal website). I am left with the problem that many web based sources can be similarly ruled out, despite the fact that it can be difficult to obtain a comparable level of detail. Others are clearly in the same boat, since the "RailScot" site cited also appears to be a personal website. Folks at 137 ( talk) 09:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
I congratulate you on having successfully cut and pasted an official list. But it is not our policy to copy such lists; it would be closer to say that it wasn't; that adds no information that an external link would not have provided. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:34, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
i did not vandalse no ones page was just responding back to what that person wrote on my page. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ford1206 ( talk • contribs) 13:30, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestion. I didn't know about this so I've "nominated" as much to try it out as with serious expectation of success. Thanks for the thought: slightly chuffed that you thought it was worth it. Folks at 137 ( talk) 17:55, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
I think I explained, in some detail, the last time you posed this question, exactly why that "source" for Michael Stapleton no longer applies. I'm not going to repeat myself, except to say that Michael Stapleton was long dead before the work attributed to him in Dennis's book was carried out, and it was carried out by his son, George. Please refer to my edits of the "Chapel Royal". Hohenloh ( talk) 15:40, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Please see the first "Michael Stapleton" section on my talk page. Hohenloh ( talk) 15:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi ww2censor, I saw your note on the Genesis page about using blogs as sources -- or not, as I am well aware that blogs are discouraged in general, and I fully support the guideline. In the case of AutoBlog, however, I understand that it has an editorial structure (similar to its sister site Engadget) which makes it more like a traditional news source than a blog, and is considered an important industry source. Additionally, they prominently display a corrections form, which indicates that they value accuracy. Thoughts? NMS Bill ( talk) 17:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
re [2] Note that WP:MOSFLAG (not WP:FLAG incidentally) only specifically deprecates flags in infoboxes for place of birth and death, it's generally being held that using them for something like the allegiance of a military figure, and the specific service to which they belonged can be a useful usage, see Wikipedia:MILMOS#Flag icons. David Underdown ( talk) 11:34, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
-- BorgQueen ( talk) 03:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello there. While I accept I am close to breaking 3RR, I have not done so yet - as you stated in this edit. I don't want to be a dick here, but I just felt that, when combined with your template on my talk, it was a bit rude. Again, I don't want to be a dick, and I don't expect an apology, I'm just saying is all. Thanks! Fin © ™ 15:44, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Ww2Censor:
I had recently stumbled across the Commons image of someone's Argentine postage stamp collection and, though the Flickr uploader should've probably scanned the stamps individually, I thought it might be a nice touch
I edited out a couple of typos (accents and the like) and added a reference where the original editor had overlooked. You seem to be a knowledgeable stamp collector; is it bad form to put up an image of multiple stamps? If so, I'll leave it alone; otherwise, I'm sure the image would be informative to those who had never seen Argentine postage and evocative to Argentines who might recall a fond memory or two.
I look forward to your thoughts.
Sincerely, 76.174.124.198 ( talk) 22:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 03:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Response for you on my talk page. -- Non-dropframe ( talk) 00:40, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Having read over [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ireland#Flag_of_Ireland_2 the discussion] on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ireland on the recent move and the concerns expressed, I have begun a move request on the flag. Your comments would be welcome here.-- Domer48 'fenian' 19:12, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Like in pakistani mountains it states disputed it should also say this on indian mountains unless you want me to remove the indian claims from pakistani mountains you should accept that indian mountains are also disputed 81.151.100.255 ( talk) 21:56, 25 October 2008 (UTC) Also in k6 it clearly states it is disputed it should say the same on other indian mountains like nun kun why do you have POV against pakistan ?? 81.151.100.255 ( talk) 21:59, 25 October 2008 (UTC) i await your response with patience then 81.151.100.255 ( talk) 22:06, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Most articles just have the dates in brackets not the places - for example Franklin D. Roosevelt. Paul Austin ( talk) 16:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)