Welcome!
Hello, Wrapped in Grey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
A Nobody
My talk
20:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
I appreciate your feeling that this cited section (which has stood for quite some time, amid all the other dedicated editors watching this page). A section with extensive citations should never be attempted to be removed from an article without seeking consensus on the article's talk page first. Raise the topic for deletion on the talk page before deleting it. Your edit was not WP:BOLD, which is fine; you are instead failing to attempt reaching consensus for deletion. Please do not remove this content again until consensus has been attained. Thank you! Doc9871 ( talk) 12:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Where you been, man? Haven't seen you editing recently... Well, anyway, you got your wish (for now) about the section I argued for inclusion. It's gone. Another editor finished up where you left off; weird, right? Anyway, happy editing, and here's an inspirational audio snippet to inspire you to fight like a War Eagle! Cheers... Doc9871 ( talk) 09:51, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
I would think you would have included a supporting citation when I challenged your edit to the Hello, Goodbye article. All you did was to add a 'citation needed' tag so you have nothing to support your edit. If there is no verifiable supporting citation added to back up your edit, it will be deleted in two days. Steelbeard1 ( talk) 13:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Hey there Wrapped in Grey, thank you for your contributions! I am a
bot alerting you that
Non-free files are
not allowed in the user or talk-space. I
removed some images that I found on
User talk:Wrapped in Grey. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your
user-space drafts or your
talk page. See a log of images removed today
here, shutoff the bot
here and report errors
here. Thank you, --
DASHBot (
talk)
02:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
"No need to discuss" isn't the way reverts work, and the "policy" you quoted is not WP policy at all, but a guide; huge difference. Care to comment, please? Doc9871 ( talk) 07:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
She's Leaving Home. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Radiopathy
•talk•
23:49, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Well, I am adding them on pages where there isn't a covers section. I feel that it would waste time talking it over, when I'm simply doing a small contribution by adding another entry. And what would you suggest I make it notable? SwisterTwister ( talk) 19:26, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:ObLaDiObLaDa-single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:29, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for finding the quote from Life and for pointing out the WP:IPC. I've restored some corrections to the cites which were made before, to provide full info on author, article, etc. Parkwells ( talk) 14:53, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:My Child dolls.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 18:06, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
You really should. [1]-- andreasegde ( talk) 00:53, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Give My Regards to Broad Street (poster).jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 16:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
John Lennon. Users who
edit disruptively or refuse to
collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the
three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the
talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains
consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Bencherlite
Talk
15:59, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Please see
the Lennon talk page and discuss your suggestions before adding them - several editors have reverted your changes which have not been improvements to this Featured Article. As per above - edit warring is not the way to go and will lead to a block.
Tvoz/
talk
18:18, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
21:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
Hello. You recently deleted a sourced paragraph from Revolver (album) with an edit summary stating that The Beatles Bible is not a reliable source. Why is it not reliable? It is just as reliable as any other website not written by an organisation and Wikipedia policy does not disallow the use of such wesbites. It is written using all the most reliable Beatles books as sources, including Leiwsohn's books. Lewisohn's books were written in the 80s, making some of the information is outdated, so The Beatles Bible, which harmonises multiple sources, is more reliable, in my opinon, than the individual books. Just because something is published on the Internet rather than on paper does not automatically make it less reliable. McLerristarr | Mclay1 22:55, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
John Lennon. Users who
edit disruptively or refuse to
collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the
three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the
talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains
consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
It appears that you have not understood the rationale behind the previous block you received - you do not reverse a revert made in good faith, and especially one with a good rationale noting the proper application of policy. Per
WP:BRD you made a
WP:BOLD edit which was
WP:Reverted with appropriate rationale, and now it is your responsibility to
WP:Discuss the insertion of the content content and gain consensus.
In regard to your edits, you need to show why this instance of activism is particularly notable and may be used as an example of Lennon's (and Yoko Ono's) political and social activities. As a Lennon fan, and previously a consistent contributor to this article, I must say that I was not familiar with the Hanratty incidents, as opposed to sending roses to striking ship builders, or sending an acorn to all the world leaders, as well as the more well known "bed in" 's. You will need to indicate why these examples, which I would suggest have a greater variety of references available as sources, should be disregarded for the one you prefer.
I trust that you will self revert your inappropriate action, and start the necessary talkpage discussion. If there are any other matters of WP policy or guideline you are unfamiliar with, please do not hesitate to contact me - it is part of the admin remit.
LessHeard vanU (
talk)
17:27, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Regardless that the onus is on you to formulate a discussion, and in view of my doubts that you are inclined to do so in your individual approach to policy compliance, I would advise you that I have initiated a discussion at the John Lennon talk page regarding the appropriateness of the Hanratty example of Lennon's political and social activism. I would also draw your attention to the fact that I have suggested that you be required to discuss any further additions of content prior to being permitted to do so. You may wish to comment upon that also. LessHeard vanU ( talk) 19:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Per WP:VNE, where applicable, 'alternative' is preferred. I've noticed the non-preferred use when referring to album and single covers—'Alternate Covers'—especially in infoboxes. Is this something your bot could help with? — Wrapped in Grey ( talk) 10:50, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
I have misplaced the link I was going to add. I will search again for it. The original LP cover was different too. Be good to get a scan of it. Davidpatrick ( talk) 20:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
That's a bit unusual. Would you mind explaining what your concern is on the talk page - there is a lot at WP:V? --John ( User:Jwy/ talk) 16:31, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
I was just curious as to why you reverted my edit of turning the track listing of Please Please Me into the table format? I was simply trying to be consistant with the pages of all the other albums in The Beatles core catalogue. Ste900R ( talk) 19:06, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
So who won? Since you brought the subject up I am assuming you're going to dash in and count the votes and declare a winner. —Prhartcom (talk) 18:39, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Disruption at The Beatles article and talkpage and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, LessHeard vanU ( talk) 22:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Wrapped in Grey, this is just a friendly notification to inform you that the Arbitration Commitee has declined to hear the case regarding The Beatles to which you were a party. Cheers. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:12, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
There is a vote taking place in which we could use your input. — GabeMc ( talk) 00:45, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
There is a vote taking place in which we could use your input. — GabeMc ( talk) 00:45, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
There is a vote taking place in which we could use your input. — GabeMc ( talk) 00:45, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
There is a discussion occuring here involving debate about whether or not the Beatles were "active" during 1994-1996. Your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc ( talk) 22:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
FYI, there is a vote taking place here, and your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc ( talk) 03:17, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Unfortunately, there is a straw poll taking place here, and your input would be appreciated.-- andreasegde ( talk) 11:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello Wrapped in Grey; this message is to inform you that there is currently a public poll to determine whether to capitalize the definite article ("the") when mentioning the band "THE BEATLES" mid-sentence. As you've previously participated either here, here, or here, your input would be appreciated. Thank you for your time. For the mediators. ~ GabeMc ( talk| contribs) 22:55, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
A Tesla Roadster for you! |
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 ( talk) 13:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Batman222june1970.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Wrapped in Grey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
A Nobody
My talk
20:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
I appreciate your feeling that this cited section (which has stood for quite some time, amid all the other dedicated editors watching this page). A section with extensive citations should never be attempted to be removed from an article without seeking consensus on the article's talk page first. Raise the topic for deletion on the talk page before deleting it. Your edit was not WP:BOLD, which is fine; you are instead failing to attempt reaching consensus for deletion. Please do not remove this content again until consensus has been attained. Thank you! Doc9871 ( talk) 12:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Where you been, man? Haven't seen you editing recently... Well, anyway, you got your wish (for now) about the section I argued for inclusion. It's gone. Another editor finished up where you left off; weird, right? Anyway, happy editing, and here's an inspirational audio snippet to inspire you to fight like a War Eagle! Cheers... Doc9871 ( talk) 09:51, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
I would think you would have included a supporting citation when I challenged your edit to the Hello, Goodbye article. All you did was to add a 'citation needed' tag so you have nothing to support your edit. If there is no verifiable supporting citation added to back up your edit, it will be deleted in two days. Steelbeard1 ( talk) 13:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Hey there Wrapped in Grey, thank you for your contributions! I am a
bot alerting you that
Non-free files are
not allowed in the user or talk-space. I
removed some images that I found on
User talk:Wrapped in Grey. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your
user-space drafts or your
talk page. See a log of images removed today
here, shutoff the bot
here and report errors
here. Thank you, --
DASHBot (
talk)
02:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
"No need to discuss" isn't the way reverts work, and the "policy" you quoted is not WP policy at all, but a guide; huge difference. Care to comment, please? Doc9871 ( talk) 07:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
She's Leaving Home. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Radiopathy
•talk•
23:49, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Well, I am adding them on pages where there isn't a covers section. I feel that it would waste time talking it over, when I'm simply doing a small contribution by adding another entry. And what would you suggest I make it notable? SwisterTwister ( talk) 19:26, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:ObLaDiObLaDa-single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:29, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for finding the quote from Life and for pointing out the WP:IPC. I've restored some corrections to the cites which were made before, to provide full info on author, article, etc. Parkwells ( talk) 14:53, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:My Child dolls.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 18:06, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
You really should. [1]-- andreasegde ( talk) 00:53, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Give My Regards to Broad Street (poster).jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 16:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
John Lennon. Users who
edit disruptively or refuse to
collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the
three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the
talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains
consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Bencherlite
Talk
15:59, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Please see
the Lennon talk page and discuss your suggestions before adding them - several editors have reverted your changes which have not been improvements to this Featured Article. As per above - edit warring is not the way to go and will lead to a block.
Tvoz/
talk
18:18, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
HJ Mitchell |
Penny for your thoughts?
21:55, 9 November 2010 (UTC)During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
Hello. You recently deleted a sourced paragraph from Revolver (album) with an edit summary stating that The Beatles Bible is not a reliable source. Why is it not reliable? It is just as reliable as any other website not written by an organisation and Wikipedia policy does not disallow the use of such wesbites. It is written using all the most reliable Beatles books as sources, including Leiwsohn's books. Lewisohn's books were written in the 80s, making some of the information is outdated, so The Beatles Bible, which harmonises multiple sources, is more reliable, in my opinon, than the individual books. Just because something is published on the Internet rather than on paper does not automatically make it less reliable. McLerristarr | Mclay1 22:55, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
John Lennon. Users who
edit disruptively or refuse to
collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the
three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the
talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains
consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
It appears that you have not understood the rationale behind the previous block you received - you do not reverse a revert made in good faith, and especially one with a good rationale noting the proper application of policy. Per
WP:BRD you made a
WP:BOLD edit which was
WP:Reverted with appropriate rationale, and now it is your responsibility to
WP:Discuss the insertion of the content content and gain consensus.
In regard to your edits, you need to show why this instance of activism is particularly notable and may be used as an example of Lennon's (and Yoko Ono's) political and social activities. As a Lennon fan, and previously a consistent contributor to this article, I must say that I was not familiar with the Hanratty incidents, as opposed to sending roses to striking ship builders, or sending an acorn to all the world leaders, as well as the more well known "bed in" 's. You will need to indicate why these examples, which I would suggest have a greater variety of references available as sources, should be disregarded for the one you prefer.
I trust that you will self revert your inappropriate action, and start the necessary talkpage discussion. If there are any other matters of WP policy or guideline you are unfamiliar with, please do not hesitate to contact me - it is part of the admin remit.
LessHeard vanU (
talk)
17:27, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Regardless that the onus is on you to formulate a discussion, and in view of my doubts that you are inclined to do so in your individual approach to policy compliance, I would advise you that I have initiated a discussion at the John Lennon talk page regarding the appropriateness of the Hanratty example of Lennon's political and social activism. I would also draw your attention to the fact that I have suggested that you be required to discuss any further additions of content prior to being permitted to do so. You may wish to comment upon that also. LessHeard vanU ( talk) 19:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Per WP:VNE, where applicable, 'alternative' is preferred. I've noticed the non-preferred use when referring to album and single covers—'Alternate Covers'—especially in infoboxes. Is this something your bot could help with? — Wrapped in Grey ( talk) 10:50, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
I have misplaced the link I was going to add. I will search again for it. The original LP cover was different too. Be good to get a scan of it. Davidpatrick ( talk) 20:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
That's a bit unusual. Would you mind explaining what your concern is on the talk page - there is a lot at WP:V? --John ( User:Jwy/ talk) 16:31, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
I was just curious as to why you reverted my edit of turning the track listing of Please Please Me into the table format? I was simply trying to be consistant with the pages of all the other albums in The Beatles core catalogue. Ste900R ( talk) 19:06, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
So who won? Since you brought the subject up I am assuming you're going to dash in and count the votes and declare a winner. —Prhartcom (talk) 18:39, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Disruption at The Beatles article and talkpage and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
Thanks, LessHeard vanU ( talk) 22:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Wrapped in Grey, this is just a friendly notification to inform you that the Arbitration Commitee has declined to hear the case regarding The Beatles to which you were a party. Cheers. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:12, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
There is a vote taking place in which we could use your input. — GabeMc ( talk) 00:45, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
There is a vote taking place in which we could use your input. — GabeMc ( talk) 00:45, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
There is a vote taking place in which we could use your input. — GabeMc ( talk) 00:45, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
There is a discussion occuring here involving debate about whether or not the Beatles were "active" during 1994-1996. Your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc ( talk) 22:51, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
FYI, there is a vote taking place here, and your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc ( talk) 03:17, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Unfortunately, there is a straw poll taking place here, and your input would be appreciated.-- andreasegde ( talk) 11:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Hello Wrapped in Grey; this message is to inform you that there is currently a public poll to determine whether to capitalize the definite article ("the") when mentioning the band "THE BEATLES" mid-sentence. As you've previously participated either here, here, or here, your input would be appreciated. Thank you for your time. For the mediators. ~ GabeMc ( talk| contribs) 22:55, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
A Tesla Roadster for you! |
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 ( talk) 13:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Batman222june1970.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:23, 28 February 2019 (UTC)