|
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alexyflemming, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Dr. K. 00:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alexyflemming, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you.
Dr.
K.
20:57, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alexyflemming.
Dr.
K.
21:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
↑disruptive editing↑ 24.15.68.186 ( talk) 23:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
24.15.68.186 ( talk) 22:36, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Bbb23 (
talk)
14:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC) |
Woodgridge ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I want my defence here to be evaluated once again carefully. After sockpuppet allegation was raised in 06.07.2016, I was blocked in 28.08.2016 with the reasoning "Behavioral evidence". Woodgridge ( talk) 17:26, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The behavioural evidence is overwhelming, so much so I can't imagine a scenario that could account for the similarities if you were indeed a separate individual. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
|
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alexyflemming, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Dr. K. 00:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alexyflemming, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you.
Dr.
K.
20:57, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alexyflemming.
Dr.
K.
21:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
↑disruptive editing↑ 24.15.68.186 ( talk) 23:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
24.15.68.186 ( talk) 22:36, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Bbb23 (
talk)
14:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC) |
Woodgridge ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I want my defence here to be evaluated once again carefully. After sockpuppet allegation was raised in 06.07.2016, I was blocked in 28.08.2016 with the reasoning "Behavioral evidence". Woodgridge ( talk) 17:26, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
The behavioural evidence is overwhelming, so much so I can't imagine a scenario that could account for the similarities if you were indeed a separate individual. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:46, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.