![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Whenever you see something like that, instantly revert with a "BenH style edits" edit summary, slap a set of warnings on his talk page, and report it to AIV. That is what I would do. Take Care... NeutralHomer • Talk • January 13, 2009 @ 17:59
I received inside information that the retransmission dispute has been resolved. I had to take the tag off the articles as the articles themselves were pulled. Just thought you wanted to know. Nicholasm79 ( talk) 02:27, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 01:14, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
I apologize for the bad edit. It was a mistake. 70.181.171.159 ( talk) 20:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
What was unconstructive about my edit? I was trying to help people avoid bad music. That is a valid and laudable task in my opinion. 69.134.101.76 ( talk) 01:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
keep up the good work —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.190.153.216 ( talk) 05:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
The IP added a second WPKY project banner to the talk page, which is unnecessary, so I removed it. I also set the "class" parameter to stub, while leaving "importance" unassessed. I think it's clear to anyone who doesn't have an agenda that "High" is too high an importance for this organization. "Mid" maybe, and probably "low" would be more accurate. However, to avoid a conflict with this IP, I'll be content to leave its importance unassessed, as literally hundreds of other articles in the project are. This determination is a little subjective, so I usually don't try to make it unless I'm reasonably sure about it.
Per the general importance criteria, assessments are only supposed to be done by WikiProject members, but the wiki software doesn't prohibit IPs (or anyone else) from changing it. Also, these criteria say that importance is impacted by "external interest", as measured by several factors. I somehow doubt KFTC generates the same amount of "external interest" as other High importance articles like say, Billy Ray Cyrus or Hatfield-McCoy feud.
Additionally, the project's own criteria for High importance articles is "Topics that are very notable within Kentucky, and well-known outside of it, and can be reasonably expected to be included in any print encyclopedia." I hardly think KFTC meets those criteria.
I've added the article to my watchlist so I can monitor things if they escalate, but in fairness, I'm leaving tonight for a business trip and will have pretty limited access to Wikipedia until Friday afternoon, so don't count on me too heavily in the short term.
BTW, I think your "neutrality disputed" banner is justified. I don't have the time or inclination to try and balance it, but I'd leave it there until somebody does. I know that can be hard from my work on PFOX and National Sanctity of Human Life Day. Acdixon ( talk • contribs • count) 19:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For reverting vandalism on my userpage. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC) |
Two issues here. First, no, I don't think PageOneKentucky qualifies as a reliable source. By virtue of being a blog, I'd say there needs to be definitive evidence that it is published by an expert or media outlet. I don't see such evidence here. I suspect the fact could be sourced to a more reliable source anyway.
The second issue is that the fact sourced to PageOne is trivia. Does anyone really think that this will be part of any serious biography of Mongiardo in any published source? I'd say you're good to go if you want to remove it. Acdixon ( talk • contribs • count) 02:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Duh. Thanks. -- Rrburke( talk) 01:58, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered at 05:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot ( Disable)
I don't have any idea what the guy's problem is. His attacks are certainly uncalled for. I think it's appropriate to remove the personal attack from his page if you wish--I didn't check the rules. If he starts in again, I'll drop a note at WP:WQA. Cheers, Katr67 ( talk) 00:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
They were fishy to me so I reverted them. The information wasn't really necessary to begin with and with the user being out of Indiana, my "something ain't right detector" was going off. Another good catch. - NeutralHomer • Talk • January 27, 2009 @ 04:26
==How'd you find out about that so quick?
Nah, that is an IP user who is seriously obsessed with the digital transition. He was blocked for a month for just this and is back at it. I would revert on spot. - NeutralHomer • Talk • January 29, 2009 @ 22:50
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page earlier! Keep up the good work. - BloodDoll ( talk) 03:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Is there a legit reason you made this edit? 123.174.145.128 ( talk) 16:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Cheers for your revert of this test edit, but you overlooked a significant act of vandalism just prior to this. A referenced section was removed in its entirety. Regards, cygnis insignis 15:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 5 | 31 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 22:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
As a contributor to the discussion regarding sports team logos, I am soliciting feedback as to the latest version of that guideline. Your support/opposition/feedback would be appreciated. — BQZip01 — talk 22:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
User:Hi878/Right Secret Page Hi878 ( talk) 16:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
For the birthday wishes ;) BlackPearl14 talkies!• contribs! 23:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
In all the hubbub with the storm and such, I failed to let you know that I've got the article on your county's namesake up for GA. Just thought you might be interested. Acdixon ( talk • contribs • count) 00:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I don't know exactly how to contact other users, so am making my best effort here. You recently undid an edit I did on the SCD page, asking me to leave discussion before making such edits. I'm frustrated because I've done the vast majority of the work on keeping that article clean, accurate and aligned with Wikipedia guidelines and also because the approach to external links is proving arbitrary with the permitted links as much in violation of W guidelines as any of the deleted ones were. (I would propose that it's difficult to find any website that does not conflict with at least one of W's extensive links policies. That doesn't concern me, but an arbitrary approach to the editing of them does.) After watching several being inappropriately (as compared to those left up) deleted time and again, I finally pulled them all and left a discussion note. I don't think any of my activity to date, as noted above, constitutes vandalism. Hoping you will get back to me either here or there. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.67.167.33 ( talk) 02:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Oh, thanks Willking. I am just learning all this stuff (edit, Huggle, talk pages, etc). Thanks for getting back to me. I will keep trying to keep my activity a-okay, too, while I get the hang of "all things Wiki". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.67.167.33 ( talk) 02:50, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
I added this note above while you were replying; moving it down here for you to catch: At this point, in terms of Huggle, editing, etc, how do I deal with the external links on that page without being cited for vandalism, etc? What I'm aiming for is for that page to have links representing a variety of perspectives and resources (ie. the two that are being left up, plus the four or five that were up until very recently, deleted by someone other than myself).Thx. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.67.167.33 ( talk) 03:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 6 | 8 February 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 23:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. A new name 2008 ( talk) 14:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba ( talk) 16:21, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Please watch your revisions. I was incredibly frustrated with the revisions and vandalism tags on my talk page as I made good faith edits to move the article Bandit to a disambiguation page, with a separate article for the television series, as had been discussed in the article's discussion page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stadler981 ( talk • contribs) 02:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
for reverting the attack on my user page. Amazingly, with all the vandalism reversions I do and warnings I issue, that was the first time I had been targeted. Wonder whose sockpuppet it was . . . Anyway, thanks for fixing it so quickly. Rivertorch ( talk) 19:38, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi878 ( talk) 23:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 08:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Not a problem :) Just a little gnome-ish edit :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • February 17, 2009 @ 00:03
Sorry for the uber-lateness, but thanks for your first edit wishes on September 19th! I'm doing well... slowly and surely recovering :) Thanks again! -- lovelaughterlife♥ talk? 00:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! - archanamiya · talk 19:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to the page
Wikipedia:How to copy-edit has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you. —
macy
23:47, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Absolutely not. First, judging from the URL, the citation comes from a blog, which is not a reliable source. As a result, this could be considered a BLP violation. Also, it seems to me to fit the definition of a WP:COATRACK. Unless there is a clear, well-documented connection between this resignation and some meaningful event in the history of the town, I'd say it's just someone with an agenda. Oh, and the username seems to suggest a WP:COI. Feel free to use any or all of those reasons as justification for your revert! :) Acdixon ( talk • contribs • count) 13:07, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Since you live in Whitesburg, KY perhaps you can answer this question. I have WNVA-FM listed as being able to be heard clearly (a "city grade signal" with no static) in Whitesburg. Would you mind giving 106.3FM a listen at your earliest convenience and let me know, please? It would be much appreciated. - NeutralHomer • Talk • February 19, 2009 @ 07:59
Thanks for uploading File:Juneandalice.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 22:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent support in the Oversight election, in which I was successful. I have begun to get my feet wet there and will do everything possible to reflect the community's trust in me. Daniel Case ( talk) 23:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Whenever you see something like that, instantly revert with a "BenH style edits" edit summary, slap a set of warnings on his talk page, and report it to AIV. That is what I would do. Take Care... NeutralHomer • Talk • January 13, 2009 @ 17:59
I received inside information that the retransmission dispute has been resolved. I had to take the tag off the articles as the articles themselves were pulled. Just thought you wanted to know. Nicholasm79 ( talk) 02:27, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 01:14, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
I apologize for the bad edit. It was a mistake. 70.181.171.159 ( talk) 20:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
What was unconstructive about my edit? I was trying to help people avoid bad music. That is a valid and laudable task in my opinion. 69.134.101.76 ( talk) 01:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
keep up the good work —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.190.153.216 ( talk) 05:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
The IP added a second WPKY project banner to the talk page, which is unnecessary, so I removed it. I also set the "class" parameter to stub, while leaving "importance" unassessed. I think it's clear to anyone who doesn't have an agenda that "High" is too high an importance for this organization. "Mid" maybe, and probably "low" would be more accurate. However, to avoid a conflict with this IP, I'll be content to leave its importance unassessed, as literally hundreds of other articles in the project are. This determination is a little subjective, so I usually don't try to make it unless I'm reasonably sure about it.
Per the general importance criteria, assessments are only supposed to be done by WikiProject members, but the wiki software doesn't prohibit IPs (or anyone else) from changing it. Also, these criteria say that importance is impacted by "external interest", as measured by several factors. I somehow doubt KFTC generates the same amount of "external interest" as other High importance articles like say, Billy Ray Cyrus or Hatfield-McCoy feud.
Additionally, the project's own criteria for High importance articles is "Topics that are very notable within Kentucky, and well-known outside of it, and can be reasonably expected to be included in any print encyclopedia." I hardly think KFTC meets those criteria.
I've added the article to my watchlist so I can monitor things if they escalate, but in fairness, I'm leaving tonight for a business trip and will have pretty limited access to Wikipedia until Friday afternoon, so don't count on me too heavily in the short term.
BTW, I think your "neutrality disputed" banner is justified. I don't have the time or inclination to try and balance it, but I'd leave it there until somebody does. I know that can be hard from my work on PFOX and National Sanctity of Human Life Day. Acdixon ( talk • contribs • count) 19:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For reverting vandalism on my userpage. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC) |
Two issues here. First, no, I don't think PageOneKentucky qualifies as a reliable source. By virtue of being a blog, I'd say there needs to be definitive evidence that it is published by an expert or media outlet. I don't see such evidence here. I suspect the fact could be sourced to a more reliable source anyway.
The second issue is that the fact sourced to PageOne is trivia. Does anyone really think that this will be part of any serious biography of Mongiardo in any published source? I'd say you're good to go if you want to remove it. Acdixon ( talk • contribs • count) 02:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Duh. Thanks. -- Rrburke( talk) 01:58, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered at 05:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot ( Disable)
I don't have any idea what the guy's problem is. His attacks are certainly uncalled for. I think it's appropriate to remove the personal attack from his page if you wish--I didn't check the rules. If he starts in again, I'll drop a note at WP:WQA. Cheers, Katr67 ( talk) 00:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
They were fishy to me so I reverted them. The information wasn't really necessary to begin with and with the user being out of Indiana, my "something ain't right detector" was going off. Another good catch. - NeutralHomer • Talk • January 27, 2009 @ 04:26
==How'd you find out about that so quick?
Nah, that is an IP user who is seriously obsessed with the digital transition. He was blocked for a month for just this and is back at it. I would revert on spot. - NeutralHomer • Talk • January 29, 2009 @ 22:50
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page earlier! Keep up the good work. - BloodDoll ( talk) 03:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Is there a legit reason you made this edit? 123.174.145.128 ( talk) 16:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Cheers for your revert of this test edit, but you overlooked a significant act of vandalism just prior to this. A referenced section was removed in its entirety. Regards, cygnis insignis 15:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 5 | 31 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 22:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
As a contributor to the discussion regarding sports team logos, I am soliciting feedback as to the latest version of that guideline. Your support/opposition/feedback would be appreciated. — BQZip01 — talk 22:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
User:Hi878/Right Secret Page Hi878 ( talk) 16:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
For the birthday wishes ;) BlackPearl14 talkies!• contribs! 23:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
In all the hubbub with the storm and such, I failed to let you know that I've got the article on your county's namesake up for GA. Just thought you might be interested. Acdixon ( talk • contribs • count) 00:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I don't know exactly how to contact other users, so am making my best effort here. You recently undid an edit I did on the SCD page, asking me to leave discussion before making such edits. I'm frustrated because I've done the vast majority of the work on keeping that article clean, accurate and aligned with Wikipedia guidelines and also because the approach to external links is proving arbitrary with the permitted links as much in violation of W guidelines as any of the deleted ones were. (I would propose that it's difficult to find any website that does not conflict with at least one of W's extensive links policies. That doesn't concern me, but an arbitrary approach to the editing of them does.) After watching several being inappropriately (as compared to those left up) deleted time and again, I finally pulled them all and left a discussion note. I don't think any of my activity to date, as noted above, constitutes vandalism. Hoping you will get back to me either here or there. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.67.167.33 ( talk) 02:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Oh, thanks Willking. I am just learning all this stuff (edit, Huggle, talk pages, etc). Thanks for getting back to me. I will keep trying to keep my activity a-okay, too, while I get the hang of "all things Wiki". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.67.167.33 ( talk) 02:50, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
I added this note above while you were replying; moving it down here for you to catch: At this point, in terms of Huggle, editing, etc, how do I deal with the external links on that page without being cited for vandalism, etc? What I'm aiming for is for that page to have links representing a variety of perspectives and resources (ie. the two that are being left up, plus the four or five that were up until very recently, deleted by someone other than myself).Thx. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.67.167.33 ( talk) 03:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 6 | 8 February 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.-- ragesoss ( talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 23:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. A new name 2008 ( talk) 14:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba ( talk) 16:21, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Please watch your revisions. I was incredibly frustrated with the revisions and vandalism tags on my talk page as I made good faith edits to move the article Bandit to a disambiguation page, with a separate article for the television series, as had been discussed in the article's discussion page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stadler981 ( talk • contribs) 02:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
for reverting the attack on my user page. Amazingly, with all the vandalism reversions I do and warnings I issue, that was the first time I had been targeted. Wonder whose sockpuppet it was . . . Anyway, thanks for fixing it so quickly. Rivertorch ( talk) 19:38, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi878 ( talk) 23:51, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 08:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Not a problem :) Just a little gnome-ish edit :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • February 17, 2009 @ 00:03
Sorry for the uber-lateness, but thanks for your first edit wishes on September 19th! I'm doing well... slowly and surely recovering :) Thanks again! -- lovelaughterlife♥ talk? 00:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks! - archanamiya · talk 19:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. The
recent edit you made to the page
Wikipedia:How to copy-edit has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the
sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative
edit summary. You may also wish to read the
introduction to editing. Thank you. —
macy
23:47, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Absolutely not. First, judging from the URL, the citation comes from a blog, which is not a reliable source. As a result, this could be considered a BLP violation. Also, it seems to me to fit the definition of a WP:COATRACK. Unless there is a clear, well-documented connection between this resignation and some meaningful event in the history of the town, I'd say it's just someone with an agenda. Oh, and the username seems to suggest a WP:COI. Feel free to use any or all of those reasons as justification for your revert! :) Acdixon ( talk • contribs • count) 13:07, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Since you live in Whitesburg, KY perhaps you can answer this question. I have WNVA-FM listed as being able to be heard clearly (a "city grade signal" with no static) in Whitesburg. Would you mind giving 106.3FM a listen at your earliest convenience and let me know, please? It would be much appreciated. - NeutralHomer • Talk • February 19, 2009 @ 07:59
Thanks for uploading File:Juneandalice.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 22:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent support in the Oversight election, in which I was successful. I have begun to get my feet wet there and will do everything possible to reflect the community's trust in me. Daniel Case ( talk) 23:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)