This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Need your opinion. A relatively new user, User:BigRedTool, added a blatantly self-promotional external link to Western Kentucky University, as seen here. I reverted the inappropriate link and added a {{ uw-spam1}} warning. Now, the user has re-added mention of the publication, but without the external link. That precludes my reverting and issuing a {{ uw-spam2}}. There's a pretty evident COI here, and from what I can tell, the publication itself isn't officially affiliated with the university. I'm struggling a bit to come up with a concise edit summary for my revert as well as an appropriate warning for the user in question. Perhaps a non-template warning is in order. I'm just trying to avoid biting the newcomers, even though I'm relatively sure this one has more of an interest in self-promotion than in improving the encyclopedia as a whole. Your suggestions? Acdixon ( talk • contribs • count) 18:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello, you currently have an Editor review request listed on the main page, although it has failed to gain comments, are you still interested in having it open, if so or if not please acknowledge me of that to make a proper archival of the nomination. Thanks.-- TRU CO 22:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
I must object to your warning of me regarding the Denim (Band) page. You even chose to use obnoxious language to me saying it was vandalism. This was shear spite and bad manners on your part. All I was doing was splitting a pages which had two subjects into two separate pages. Nothing was removed from wikipedia, just moved to the two new pages. Now I may have been wrong to do that, but in no way was that vandalism. Declan ( talk) 00:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
This is the first article created by an editor, who apparently copied all the templates that were at the top of Dragon Ball. I would strongly suggest that you take a second to look at why an edit is being done before simply assuming, incorrectly, that it is vandalism. 199.125.109.102 ( talk) 01:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 08:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Wtcw.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 03:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 01:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
On Monday, March 9, 2009, I created the article Appalachian music after reading the WikiProject Appalachia page. Someone attempted to restore the redirect to Old-time music, telling me that there was very little information. I undid that edit. However, they were correct regarding the amount of information in the article. Thus, I have a proposal: if we can, we can work together to improve and expand the Appalachian music article. If you know anyone who can help out with the article, please let them know. If you are interested in assisting, have questions, want to talk, etc., feel free to put something on my talk page.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated. TTS51207 ( talk) 15:46, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
That's great! Thanks for your help. I will try to get some refs in ASAP. TTS51207 ( talk) 16:57, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I have sent a report to AIV about the anon user. I will keep an eye on the contribs, you do the same :) Good catch :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • March 16, 2009 @ 22:20
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 00:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Testing for account creation Willking1979 ( talk) 21:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your interest in helping users create accounts. I'm pleased to advise you that your request has been approved. Please read WP:ACCG before using the system. You can log in at http://stable.toolserver.org/acc/acc.php.
For the moment you will be limited to creating 6 accounts per day, and you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user. If you find yourself running into this limit frequently, please request the accountcreator permission at WP:RPE. Stifle ( talk) 09:51, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed that you've declined couple of account requests as too similar to existing accounts, created >2 years ago and with no contributions. As I understand, in case if the similar account is inactive, account creation is permitted. I'm just curiuos about your rationale to decline. Thanks, Skarebo ( talk) 02:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
I don't know how this works, so I'll just post here and assume that you'll be able to see it. The Billy Gillispie edit was due to information I have received that I cannot link because it is not on the internet as an article yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.180.48.158 ( talk) 20:56, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 04:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Yup, that would be him. Keep an eye out on that IP for more edits. Good catch. - NeutralHomer • Talk • March 25, 2009 @ 23:49
Thanks for your diligent reverts at Porch monkey, all the best Spitfire Tally-ho! 01:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 20:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
You know, the blocks were from 10 months and before that. There were 5 total. Most of them were very controversial and caused a lot of disputes among regulars at Wikipedia. One of the blocking admin is currently at ArbCom for abusing his ops. The actual notyet link has nothing to do what you intend, but regardless of that - if not yet after 10 months, then it really is not yet either, no? Ottava Rima ( talk) 20:54, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the headsup. Full set of warnings, all reverted and sent to AIV. - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 6, 2009 @ 01:51
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 20:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Wkyt.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 01:16, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Wtcw.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 01:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Yup, that would be one. Just keep an eye on the contribs and revert as necessary. Good catch. You are getting good at sockwatch :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 8, 2009 @ 15:49
(context- this revert) You reverted an unsourced paragraph that has a fact tag over two years old. Shouldn't it just be removed, since it is old and unsourced? And apropos of nothing, we are within a week of each other in age. tedder ( talk) 02:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 17:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my user talk page from vandalism quickly. :) -- Ian Weller ( talk) 00:02, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I would like to apologize for my streaks of vandalism, mostly on J. delanoy's user talk page. It was un-called for, but I was frustrated, because he deleted a page, which he thought was vandalism, but was not. I know I should not have taken my frustrations out, but I didn't know what else to do. I apologize, thank you. Dirty MF Harry ( talk) 13:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Dirty MF Harry
I myself was raised in Jenkins. To all of at least the ages of teenagers all call Jenkins and McRoberts J-Town and Mc-Town. So you were wrong in saying they were vandilism and if I have to I will credit the citizens of both cities. I also feel that you were very rude to me in how you went around saying that what I said was vandilism. I took an offense to it, your intentions may have been good but your word choice was not. Jfd265 ( talk) 00:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC) JFD265
Not a problem :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 17, 2009 @ 01:12
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage ( Nz26). Its greatly appreciated. My brother knows about this and has sort of been banned from using our computer. Yay!. The reason why im on this IP address is because im on a wikibreak. Thanks Again! - 125.237.213.1 ( talk) 01:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry mate, please accept my apology —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.69.252.64 ( talk) 02:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Heh, I thank you for it, I was stumped as all hell on that one. -- Dylan 620 Efforts · Toolbox 00:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
My addition of a notable resident continues to be deleted by you. Do all I need to do is get proof from the internet that this person lived there? He is a notable local resident in the many contributions he gave to the city... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kozmo1 ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for the work, though if you have a second please consider my note here. Thanks! Nja 247 20:19, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 05:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
What was unconstructive about my last edit? I added referenced information about basque and spanish involvement, why is that vandalism?-- 94.192.227.195 ( talk) 00:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Robley Rex, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robley Rex. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fol de rol troll ( talk) 14:10, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
For future note, unambiguous advertisement pages can be tagged for speedy deletion with {{ Db-g11}} or {{ Db-spam}}, bypassing Miscellany for Deletion altogether. See the Criteria for speedy deletion page (linked above) for a full list of situations where a page can be tagged for speedy deletion. - Jeremy ( v^_^v Cardmaker) 19:36, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Need your opinion. A relatively new user, User:BigRedTool, added a blatantly self-promotional external link to Western Kentucky University, as seen here. I reverted the inappropriate link and added a {{ uw-spam1}} warning. Now, the user has re-added mention of the publication, but without the external link. That precludes my reverting and issuing a {{ uw-spam2}}. There's a pretty evident COI here, and from what I can tell, the publication itself isn't officially affiliated with the university. I'm struggling a bit to come up with a concise edit summary for my revert as well as an appropriate warning for the user in question. Perhaps a non-template warning is in order. I'm just trying to avoid biting the newcomers, even though I'm relatively sure this one has more of an interest in self-promotion than in improving the encyclopedia as a whole. Your suggestions? Acdixon ( talk • contribs • count) 18:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello, you currently have an Editor review request listed on the main page, although it has failed to gain comments, are you still interested in having it open, if so or if not please acknowledge me of that to make a proper archival of the nomination. Thanks.-- TRU CO 22:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
I must object to your warning of me regarding the Denim (Band) page. You even chose to use obnoxious language to me saying it was vandalism. This was shear spite and bad manners on your part. All I was doing was splitting a pages which had two subjects into two separate pages. Nothing was removed from wikipedia, just moved to the two new pages. Now I may have been wrong to do that, but in no way was that vandalism. Declan ( talk) 00:56, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
This is the first article created by an editor, who apparently copied all the templates that were at the top of Dragon Ball. I would strongly suggest that you take a second to look at why an edit is being done before simply assuming, incorrectly, that it is vandalism. 199.125.109.102 ( talk) 01:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 08:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Wtcw.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 03:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 01:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
On Monday, March 9, 2009, I created the article Appalachian music after reading the WikiProject Appalachia page. Someone attempted to restore the redirect to Old-time music, telling me that there was very little information. I undid that edit. However, they were correct regarding the amount of information in the article. Thus, I have a proposal: if we can, we can work together to improve and expand the Appalachian music article. If you know anyone who can help out with the article, please let them know. If you are interested in assisting, have questions, want to talk, etc., feel free to put something on my talk page.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated. TTS51207 ( talk) 15:46, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
That's great! Thanks for your help. I will try to get some refs in ASAP. TTS51207 ( talk) 16:57, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I have sent a report to AIV about the anon user. I will keep an eye on the contribs, you do the same :) Good catch :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • March 16, 2009 @ 22:20
Delivered by §hepBot ( Disable) at 00:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Testing for account creation Willking1979 ( talk) 21:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your interest in helping users create accounts. I'm pleased to advise you that your request has been approved. Please read WP:ACCG before using the system. You can log in at http://stable.toolserver.org/acc/acc.php.
For the moment you will be limited to creating 6 accounts per day, and you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user. If you find yourself running into this limit frequently, please request the accountcreator permission at WP:RPE. Stifle ( talk) 09:51, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I've noticed that you've declined couple of account requests as too similar to existing accounts, created >2 years ago and with no contributions. As I understand, in case if the similar account is inactive, account creation is permitted. I'm just curiuos about your rationale to decline. Thanks, Skarebo ( talk) 02:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
I don't know how this works, so I'll just post here and assume that you'll be able to see it. The Billy Gillispie edit was due to information I have received that I cannot link because it is not on the internet as an article yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.180.48.158 ( talk) 20:56, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 04:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Yup, that would be him. Keep an eye out on that IP for more edits. Good catch. - NeutralHomer • Talk • March 25, 2009 @ 23:49
Thanks for your diligent reverts at Porch monkey, all the best Spitfire Tally-ho! 01:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 20:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
You know, the blocks were from 10 months and before that. There were 5 total. Most of them were very controversial and caused a lot of disputes among regulars at Wikipedia. One of the blocking admin is currently at ArbCom for abusing his ops. The actual notyet link has nothing to do what you intend, but regardless of that - if not yet after 10 months, then it really is not yet either, no? Ottava Rima ( talk) 20:54, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the headsup. Full set of warnings, all reverted and sent to AIV. - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 6, 2009 @ 01:51
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 20:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Wkyt.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 01:16, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Wtcw.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 01:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Yup, that would be one. Just keep an eye on the contribs and revert as necessary. Good catch. You are getting good at sockwatch :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 8, 2009 @ 15:49
(context- this revert) You reverted an unsourced paragraph that has a fact tag over two years old. Shouldn't it just be removed, since it is old and unsourced? And apropos of nothing, we are within a week of each other in age. tedder ( talk) 02:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delievered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 17:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting my user talk page from vandalism quickly. :) -- Ian Weller ( talk) 00:02, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I would like to apologize for my streaks of vandalism, mostly on J. delanoy's user talk page. It was un-called for, but I was frustrated, because he deleted a page, which he thought was vandalism, but was not. I know I should not have taken my frustrations out, but I didn't know what else to do. I apologize, thank you. Dirty MF Harry ( talk) 13:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Dirty MF Harry
I myself was raised in Jenkins. To all of at least the ages of teenagers all call Jenkins and McRoberts J-Town and Mc-Town. So you were wrong in saying they were vandilism and if I have to I will credit the citizens of both cities. I also feel that you were very rude to me in how you went around saying that what I said was vandilism. I took an offense to it, your intentions may have been good but your word choice was not. Jfd265 ( talk) 00:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC) JFD265
Not a problem :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 17, 2009 @ 01:12
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage ( Nz26). Its greatly appreciated. My brother knows about this and has sort of been banned from using our computer. Yay!. The reason why im on this IP address is because im on a wikibreak. Thanks Again! - 125.237.213.1 ( talk) 01:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry mate, please accept my apology —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.69.252.64 ( talk) 02:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Heh, I thank you for it, I was stumped as all hell on that one. -- Dylan 620 Efforts · Toolbox 00:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
My addition of a notable resident continues to be deleted by you. Do all I need to do is get proof from the internet that this person lived there? He is a notable local resident in the many contributions he gave to the city... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kozmo1 ( talk • contribs)
Thanks for the work, though if you have a second please consider my note here. Thanks! Nja 247 20:19, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot II ( talk) at 05:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
What was unconstructive about my last edit? I added referenced information about basque and spanish involvement, why is that vandalism?-- 94.192.227.195 ( talk) 00:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Robley Rex, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robley Rex. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fol de rol troll ( talk) 14:10, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
For future note, unambiguous advertisement pages can be tagged for speedy deletion with {{ Db-g11}} or {{ Db-spam}}, bypassing Miscellany for Deletion altogether. See the Criteria for speedy deletion page (linked above) for a full list of situations where a page can be tagged for speedy deletion. - Jeremy ( v^_^v Cardmaker) 19:36, 2 May 2009 (UTC)