This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Philip Karl Lunderberg. Since you had some involvement with the Philip Karl Lunderberg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Checkingfax ( talk) 01:28, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
This is a neutral notice that an RfC has been opened at an article which you have edited within the past year. It is at Talk:Clint Eastwood#8 children by 6 women. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 14:14, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Somebody imped a sysop to create two unflattering categories, imped me, and added the two categories to my user page with this edit: [1]. Please investigate. Checkingfax ( talk) 00:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Materialscientist, your email to me was blank and I have not received a subsequent email. Please run a Checkuser on the Editor that hacked and vandalized my account. Please email me the results. Please put another YGM here when you reply by email. Thank you. Checkingfax ( talk) 19:59, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claycord.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claycord.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies ( talk) 01:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Somerville is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Somerville until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stickee (talk) 04:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on William Frizzell (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ( t) Josve05a ( c) 17:49, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Claycord.com logo news and talk.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:24, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Umpqua Community College shooting. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. There is zero question about this issue anymore. Read the discussion. ― Mandruss ☎ 03:24, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Fanny's your aunt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Masum Ibn Musa Conversation 12:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Please see WP:LAYOUT for the correct order of sections:
Peter coxhead ( talk) 17:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I reviewed the Macaulay Culkin article and Reverted the 2 pending-changes but both stayed in the Pending-changes queue so I tried a Rollback but the rollbacker reported "there is nothing to do". Macaulay's article still shows the 2 reviews as "pending".
Here is a link to the diff page:
Macaulay_Culkin&diff=cur&oldid=680295614#
Here is a link to the queue:
Special:PendingChanges
Please help. Thank you.
Checkingfax (
talk)
03:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Please refer to my close at Andrew Hurley (disambiguation)'s nomination for a possible resolution for the disambiguation page situation. As it currently stands, there is no primary topic for "Andrew Hurley". Also, I removed the "two dabs" cleanup tag you had placed on Andrew Hurley since it was invalid; the tag would only apply if the phrase "Andrew Hurley" applied to a primary topic, which it currently doesn't since Andrew Hurley is a disambiguation page. Steel1943 ( talk) 23:27, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Checkingfax. The archives are off-limits. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 22:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
{{u|
Checkingfax}} {
Talk}
22:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)I just noticed
this. Is this allowed? I've only seen them used for wikispace stuff, IOW not for the encyclopedia. -- {{u|
BullRangifer}} {
Talk}
05:07, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
{{u|
Checkingfax}} {
Talk}
05:21, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
{{u|
BullRangifer}} {
Talk}
06:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
{{u|
BullRangifer}} {
Talk}
06:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)I've deleted the redirects you created to userspace, including to your user page. Not only is it against MOS, it is also a speedy delete criteria ( WP:R2). Bgwhite ( talk) 07:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect PPUVC. Since you had some involvement with the PPUVC redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Bgwhite ( talk) 06:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Re [2], have a look at the second paragraph of Wikipedia:Wikimedia_sister_projects#Where_to_place_links - "at the beginning of the last section of the article (which is not necessarily the "External links" section)". Thanks. Mike Peel ( talk) 14:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
CHiPs. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend ( ✉) 01:59, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Checkingfax.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Goods and services • Marie Serneholt Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
A continuum of
goods and services
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Marie Serneholt • Allegra Versace Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Request to revisit the discussion. North America 1000 14:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Marie Serneholt at the 48th Guldbagge Awards.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Allegra Versace • Comedy horror Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
The text I added had a citation. The text I replaced had no citation and was false. NobleHumanBeing ( talk) 07:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Why did you accuse me of being a sockpuppet and "Donald Trump disruption mostly", without stating any evidence?
I was unfairly blocked from editing - /info/en/?search=2015_San_Bernardino_shooting I added a reference from ( https://www.fbi.gov/news/news_blog/fbi-will-investigate-san-bernardino-shootings-as-terrorist-act) to Islamic terrorism and was unjustly blocked from posting the truth? I will make sure this goes viral since I'm being censored from posting facts with a .gov reference supporting it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by PizzazzPicasso ( talk • contribs) 20:40, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TF { Contribs } 20:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Princess Leia with characteristic hairstyle cosplayed.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: International law • Coffee production in Cuba Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
The word
scandal is used a few times in several bibles like
Douay–Rheims Bible.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Princess Leia • International law Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 01:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MBUSHIstory ( talk) 13:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Re your WP:Harrassment [3], made instead of supplying evidence that caused you to make WP:SP accusations against me. MBUSHIstory ( talk) 14:22, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Your editing is being discussed here and here. MBUSHIstory ( talk) 15:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
New discussion is here MBUSHIstory ( talk) 21:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. You will have to bully, harass, and lie about some other editor. I am asking that my account be closed. MBUSHIstory ( talk) 18:25, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Greetings WikiProject TAFI members!
Over the past two weeks, there has been extensive discussion on introducing bot automation to assist with maintenance of the Today's Articles for Improvement project. A bot has now been approved for trial and will carry out the weekly duties. The bots first run will occur around 00:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC) (midnight on Sunday).
If you have been assisting any of the weekly maintenance tasks, please refrain from doing so this week. The bot needs to be tested and proven it can do the job, and it only gets one chance per week. The tasks will include:
Updating the accomplishments and archiving selections is still done manually, along with daily tasks such as adding approved entries to the articles for improvement page. These will become automated in the near future.
We hope the bot proves to serve well, and by carrying out the routine housekeeping tasks we can boost the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the project. MusikBot thanks you for your service in helping with the weekly tasks in the past, and for your cooperation during this trial period :)
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:48, 21 November 2015 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • for all project notifications
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Philip Karl Lunderberg. Since you had some involvement with the Philip Karl Lunderberg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Checkingfax ( talk) 01:28, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
This is a neutral notice that an RfC has been opened at an article which you have edited within the past year. It is at Talk:Clint Eastwood#8 children by 6 women. -- Tenebrae ( talk) 14:14, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Somebody imped a sysop to create two unflattering categories, imped me, and added the two categories to my user page with this edit: [1]. Please investigate. Checkingfax ( talk) 00:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Materialscientist, your email to me was blank and I have not received a subsequent email. Please run a Checkuser on the Editor that hacked and vandalized my account. Please email me the results. Please put another YGM here when you reply by email. Thank you. Checkingfax ( talk) 19:59, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claycord.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claycord.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies ( talk) 01:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Somerville is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Somerville until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stickee (talk) 04:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on William Frizzell (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ( t) Josve05a ( c) 17:49, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Claycord.com logo news and talk.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:24, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Umpqua Community College shooting. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. There is zero question about this issue anymore. Read the discussion. ― Mandruss ☎ 03:24, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Fanny's your aunt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Masum Ibn Musa Conversation 12:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Please see WP:LAYOUT for the correct order of sections:
Peter coxhead ( talk) 17:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I reviewed the Macaulay Culkin article and Reverted the 2 pending-changes but both stayed in the Pending-changes queue so I tried a Rollback but the rollbacker reported "there is nothing to do". Macaulay's article still shows the 2 reviews as "pending".
Here is a link to the diff page:
Macaulay_Culkin&diff=cur&oldid=680295614#
Here is a link to the queue:
Special:PendingChanges
Please help. Thank you.
Checkingfax (
talk)
03:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Please refer to my close at Andrew Hurley (disambiguation)'s nomination for a possible resolution for the disambiguation page situation. As it currently stands, there is no primary topic for "Andrew Hurley". Also, I removed the "two dabs" cleanup tag you had placed on Andrew Hurley since it was invalid; the tag would only apply if the phrase "Andrew Hurley" applied to a primary topic, which it currently doesn't since Andrew Hurley is a disambiguation page. Steel1943 ( talk) 23:27, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi, Checkingfax. The archives are off-limits. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 22:36, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
{{u|
Checkingfax}} {
Talk}
22:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)I just noticed
this. Is this allowed? I've only seen them used for wikispace stuff, IOW not for the encyclopedia. -- {{u|
BullRangifer}} {
Talk}
05:07, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
{{u|
Checkingfax}} {
Talk}
05:21, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
{{u|
BullRangifer}} {
Talk}
06:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
{{u|
BullRangifer}} {
Talk}
06:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)I've deleted the redirects you created to userspace, including to your user page. Not only is it against MOS, it is also a speedy delete criteria ( WP:R2). Bgwhite ( talk) 07:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect PPUVC. Since you had some involvement with the PPUVC redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Bgwhite ( talk) 06:21, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Re [2], have a look at the second paragraph of Wikipedia:Wikimedia_sister_projects#Where_to_place_links - "at the beginning of the last section of the article (which is not necessarily the "External links" section)". Thanks. Mike Peel ( talk) 14:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
CHiPs. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. AussieLegend ( ✉) 01:59, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Checkingfax.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Goods and services • Marie Serneholt Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
A continuum of
goods and services
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Marie Serneholt • Allegra Versace Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:16, 16 November 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
Request to revisit the discussion. North America 1000 14:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Marie Serneholt at the 48th Guldbagge Awards.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Allegra Versace • Comedy horror Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: EuroCarGT ( talk) 00:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
The text I added had a citation. The text I replaced had no citation and was false. NobleHumanBeing ( talk) 07:03, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Why did you accuse me of being a sockpuppet and "Donald Trump disruption mostly", without stating any evidence?
I was unfairly blocked from editing - /info/en/?search=2015_San_Bernardino_shooting I added a reference from ( https://www.fbi.gov/news/news_blog/fbi-will-investigate-san-bernardino-shootings-as-terrorist-act) to Islamic terrorism and was unjustly blocked from posting the truth? I will make sure this goes viral since I'm being censored from posting facts with a .gov reference supporting it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by PizzazzPicasso ( talk • contribs) 20:40, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TF { Contribs } 20:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Princess Leia with characteristic hairstyle cosplayed.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: International law • Coffee production in Cuba Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
The word
scandal is used a few times in several bibles like
Douay–Rheims Bible.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Princess Leia • International law Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 01:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • |
---|
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MBUSHIstory ( talk) 13:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Re your WP:Harrassment [3], made instead of supplying evidence that caused you to make WP:SP accusations against me. MBUSHIstory ( talk) 14:22, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Your editing is being discussed here and here. MBUSHIstory ( talk) 15:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
New discussion is here MBUSHIstory ( talk) 21:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. You will have to bully, harass, and lie about some other editor. I am asking that my account be closed. MBUSHIstory ( talk) 18:25, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Greetings WikiProject TAFI members!
Over the past two weeks, there has been extensive discussion on introducing bot automation to assist with maintenance of the Today's Articles for Improvement project. A bot has now been approved for trial and will carry out the weekly duties. The bots first run will occur around 00:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC) (midnight on Sunday).
If you have been assisting any of the weekly maintenance tasks, please refrain from doing so this week. The bot needs to be tested and proven it can do the job, and it only gets one chance per week. The tasks will include:
Updating the accomplishments and archiving selections is still done manually, along with daily tasks such as adding approved entries to the articles for improvement page. These will become automated in the near future.
We hope the bot proves to serve well, and by carrying out the routine housekeeping tasks we can boost the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the project. MusikBot thanks you for your service in helping with the weekly tasks in the past, and for your cooperation during this trial period :)
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 19:48, 21 November 2015 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • for all project notifications