![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for keeping my user space clean of vandals. Name Omitted ( talk) 01:36, 17 May 2015 (UTC) |
My correction of the Floyd Algorithm are correct. The entire artcle needs a rewrite to be both understandable and correct. As it remains, it is confusing my students and I spend a lot of time correcting their errors gleaned from this article. This is a simple to understand algorithm when explained clearly. Instead we don't only have mathematical snobbery, but truly inaccurate information. I am SICK of wikipeadia inability to just tell wrong from write. Mathematical truth is not a matter of a VOTE. When k = 1, it is not equal to zero. Fixing this page requires a complete rewrite because the graph and the agorthms don't match and the explanation doesn't inform the reader of facts. Not having fixed these problems in the article has been called not passing a litmus test. The only litmus test here is if the article is informative and educational. It is NOT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.57.23.82 ( talk) 02:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Minkyumthemaster ( talk) 15:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Dear WIA,
Thank you for your feedback.
This is in regards to the "Comment: IMDb and Wikipedia are not reliable sources. The remaining references don't discuss Kaitlyn Dias in enough detail to prove that she's notable. They only mention her in passing, in at most one sentence. To make out notability, you'll need to find and add reliable, independent (third-party) sources that discuss the subject in significant detail. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks, wia (talk) 13:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)"
I understand the situation, but part of the problem I am having is that she is a new comer in Pixar's up coming (june 19th) movie Inside Out, and no one has started talking about her in detail yet. I would like for them/the public to have a place (Wikipedia) that they can go to start getting accurate information on Kaitlyn.
Best Regards, RichardGDias1 ( talk) 00:17, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Richard Dias
WIA,
Agreed. We should see more press on Kaitlyn next month.
Thanks again, RichardGDias1 ( talk) 00:40, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Richard Dias
Hi Wikiisawesome! I think I got it this time-- resubmitted today…
MacMason ( talk) 06:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC) MacMason ( talk) 06:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi WIA,
Thanks for your feedback to my AFC for National Christian Foundation. Your notes were helpful, and I updated the verbiage in the article:
Would you mind reviewing once more? Additional feedback is welcome!
Should I resubmit? Or is notifying you enough? Since you've been sort of overseeing the article, I especially want your feedback.
Thanks in advance.
Talk soon, Copeland
Hi Wia, First of all I would like to thank you very much for the time you've taken to review my article. As for the sources, most of the article is based on a booklet written on Abdulaziz Al-Bashir, but the booklet is in Arabic. We've also taken some information from well known Arabic newspapers in Kuwait. If you would like me to scan the booklet for you, I would do so. Here are two links of newspaper articles in Arabic, but I have more.
http://alwatan.kuwait.tt/articledetails.aspx?id=414585 http://www.alqabas-kw.com/Article.aspx?id=1016865&date=15012015
Thanks again
Radbleu ( talk) 10:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
“ | The term "published" is most commonly associated with text materials, either in traditional printed format or online. However, audio, video, and multimedia materials that have been recorded then broadcast, distributed, or archived by a reputable party may also meet the necessary criteria to be considered reliable sources. Like text sources, media sources must be produced by a reliable third party and be properly cited. Additionally, an archived copy of the media must exist. It is convenient, but by no means necessary, for the archived copy to be accessible via the Internet. | ” |
Have I told you about this list? bd2412 T 19:29, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi WIA
Thanks for your comments. They are very helpful. I'm hoping you can steer me in the right direction. I had previously rewritten the History section of my draft as suggested by you previously. As suggested I didn't paraphrase, however there are some phrases that need to remain the same as the K News article because they are peoples names etc. Is there any other way around this, or any other suggestions that you might have. I really need this article to go live and am willing to make the necessary changes to do so.
Hi I have also noticed that you have pointed to JP Corrys website for copyrighting. This is actually copy I have written for submission on their website. Any suggestions? I could ask them to remove it until this article makes it through the submission process. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Debbie M Wilson ( talk • contribs) 13:53, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Thanks in advance Debbie M Wilson ( talk) 07:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi WIA Thanks so much for pinpointing to the issues. I have email K Rend marketing manager who has approved use of the material and submitted the links to Wikimedia commons. Fingers crossed. Debbie M Wilson ( talk) 12:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Wia for your help with my first submission (Emil Milan). It is accepted now. I deleted/rewrote everything I thought could be seen as promotional or original research. But it is still tagged as sometimes a problem in those respects. Can you take another look at it? Any guidance from you would be appreciated. Thanks, Craig.
Craiger19 (
talk)
11:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Craiger19 ( talk) 11:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Dear Wia, Thank you very much for your prompt reply and constructive advice. I am including an audio file, which is a weekly radio program. This program was broadcast by the second Kuwaiti official radio station about 2 months ago, the program is well known as well as the presenter by all Kuwaitis. We received a copy from the station itself that I uploaded to dropbox. Here is the link:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sez8rpibx8r9v7k/AAB-loA920RAKFTi3uSEAxzaa?dl=0
The program has everything mentioned in the article and more. I hope will help so that we can publish the article. Thank you. Radbleu ( talk) 13:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
To Whom it may concern,
I am requesting a re-review as I have written this as neutral as I believe necessary. As a female architect, there is a general lack of female representation in the field prominently male. It is not my intention for the entry to read as an advertisement for Dr Maturana, I believe this may be due to many of her opinions as most of her work expresses these opinions. The book publication can also be deleted if this will help with the entry, this was a major publication for her and it seemed relevant to include but if it is against the wikipedia guidelines then I can remove it with no issue. I am happy to edit out the sections which you feel the entry is not subjective enough or rewrite sections altogether provided you feedback. I would not like to see an architect with such global influences and a history of social justice not be more freely known to all wikipedia users.
I do hoipe you reconsider or provide some feedback for a more balanced entry that you would deem appropriate for wikipedia.
Thank you
Chris Buchhorn
110.148.117.189 (
talk)
13:01, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you Wikiisawesome. I read your user description and it is really awesome. I appreciate your presence. Thank you and I still hoping that my page will approve :(. God bless. :( Systemupdate101 ( talk) 14:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC) |
![]() |
Thank you. |
Thank you for your sharing. You motivated me well. Have a nice day and God bless. I hope that you will help others also like me. Thank you. I will never forget. :) Systemupdate101 ( talk) 15:11, 23 May 2015 (UTC) |
Thanks Wia. I shortened the "Use of Wood" and "Tools and Techniques" sections and added more references. Please take another look when you can.
Craig
Craiger19 (
talk)
23:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Craiger19 ( talk) 23:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
I am the author of the copyrighted Hemodynamic Management Chart at hemodynamicsociety.org (I am the Society's Chairman). I have removed the "copyright" logo form the Chart at Wikipedia article and uploaded it under Commons, so I hope the article is now acceptable for publication.
Thanks,
Bo
Bbosramek (
talk) 01:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Bbosramek (
talk)
01:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
I have just remove the copyright from the corresponding web site at the hemodynamicsociety.org. Will that, together with removing the copyright symbol from Fig.10, resolve the copyright issue?
Please let me know.
Bbosramek (
talk) 01:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Bbosramek (
talk)
01:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello! I only have one source at the moment, written in Albanian. How many sources are required for this to be approved?
Albanianhistory ( talk) 14:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Dear Wia,
Thank you once again for your guidance. I added some new references and included the audio. As for the sentence "He constantly encouraged employees to enrol in training courses and higher studies, which was also a helpful element in keeping up with latest developments in the field" and The "Favorite pastime" section, they are clearly mentioned in the radio program and the booklet. But, if you think it is better that I discard them, I will.
Also Wia, I am preparing the Arabic and French versions; what is the procedure?
Thank you and enjoy what is left of the weekend.
Radbleu (
talk)
11:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I put the article through a plagiarism checker and believe that I successfully avoided plagiarism and close paraphrasing, so maybe what you used was more sensitive than the one that I used. Could you post the problematical sections on my talk page? Thanks! Stigmatella aurantiaca ( talk) 17:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Stigmatella aurantiaca ( talk) 17:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for the trouble, it was indeed meant as a user page. Found the correct path to do so now, must've misclicked somewhere when taking my first steps on my account.
Thanks for pointing out the error ;)
Maedean Shepard ( talk) 21:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Maedean Shepard ( talk) 21:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
teh editz 0n d4rk m4tt3r?????? oneoneone :(111-- 68.168.122.157 ( talk) 23:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)-- 68.168.122.157 ( talk) 23:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)-- 68.168.122.157 ( talk) 23:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Why Did you delete my analysis on the Uniquely American Human Right Self Defense what's protected by the 2nd Amendment ? 1) are you an American ?
That's a lot to read. Could you be more specific ?
Wikiisawesome - --- I'm not being disruptive. It's a uniquely American Human Right to be able to defend Self. You have a Self so stand tall and defend Self. We all do have this tight to be able to defend self from rape/murder which are violations of self. Get the point please. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ai6pg ( talk • contribs) 04:52, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Reputable is based on Natural Law. You have Self given by God and, he does want you defend it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ai6pg ( talk • contribs) 18:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Well I faxed my interpretation and vision to Congress and, I hope they will work to fix it. It's in the Bill of Rights. Now if you are an American, I hope you will see what I'm trying to do and raise the bar a bit, and it would be good for the economy too. As you know Rape and Murder are evil, and as an American, we do have a right to defend Self from it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ai6pg ( talk • contribs) 23:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Yeah I agree not really constructive. Im from the area. Fact is no one lives on the islands. They are tiny little sandy islands where people pull up boats and party. So while what I said is indeed true, I guess there are more eloquent ways to describe what goes on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.117.84.163 ( talk) 22:44, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
I understand you have rejected a new article on "Regression Therapy" and have suggested that it is included in an existing article on "Past Life Regression". I would like you to reconsider this decision the following reasons;
Regression Therapy is a separate discipline of therapy drawing on many healing modularities; age regression, inner child regression, body therapy, transpersonal experiences, and If stories emerge from a client that appear to be past lives they are dealt with as healing metaphors. Thats was clearly stated in the article. This is completely different from past life regression which is about allowing people having just "past life experiences" which they may think are real.
Past Life Regression is a controversial subject open to different religious and cultural views and the article is subject to may changes and disputes. Not an area I wish to enter.
Regression therapy is practiced by medical doctors and therapists working to a clearly defined international standard. It has thousands of therapists across the world doing this work. As such it deserves respect from Wikipedia to have an article covering this work.
The article on Regression Therapy has been written to provide notability and verification to meet Wikipedia standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy Tomlinson ( talk • contribs) 09:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
My submission was rejected because "the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Marsh & McLennan Companies instead." Marsh and Marsh & McLennan companies are separate entities. Marsh and McLennan companies is the parent company of Marsh LLC. We share history but they are separate and distinct entities.
Could you please let me know what I need to do get the Marsh page published?
Paid2Tweet (
talk)
13:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I tried a different plagiarism checker (Grammarly). The lede passed Grammarly, but you're right, the Instrument section looks problematical. Give me a day to work on it.
Stigmatella aurantiaca ( talk) 17:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Search the supplied link, http://emmyonline.org/mediacenter/sports_34th_winners.html Jeff Kalvin is listed. It is properly referenced. Misterhandsfriend ( talk) 15:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello there,
So I created a new article and submitted for review. You mentioned I need more reliable references. Question is, references must be in English or any language will do? Tnks a million ;-) Mironit9 ( talk) 19:19, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Mironit9
To add references:
Dear Wikiiawesome,
thanks for your feedback re my proposed article "European research and innovation for environment: policy and actions"
/info/en/?search=Draft:European_research_and_innovation_for_environment:_policy_and_actions#More_information_about_the_European_research_and_innovation_for_environment_policy
Could you please help by pointing out which paragraphs you consider copied from a report? Many thanks, Monica Soniamo ( talk) 16:43, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
19:14] <+topaz> soniamo: I think I agree that this is an "edge case" and that the instnaces of copied material don't constitute copyright infringement
So I am working with topaz and we will submit it again. if you have other comments, please let me know
Thanks, Monica
@ Soniamo: Sorry for the late reply. I think the copying issue from the europa site you linked above has been dealt with. Once you've finished cleaning up the article, you can resubmit it and an AFC reviewer will be along in the coming weeks to take another look. Thanks, /wia /talk 23:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi - I am trying to add a new Wikipedia page for Jennifer Yen, and it was rejected due to insufficient sources. Jennifer played Vypra in the Power Rangers. I was looking at the Power Rangers page,
/info/en/?search=Power_Rangers_Lightspeed_Rescue, and then at another one of the villian's wikipedia page,
/info/en/?search=Diane_Salinger -- it looks like the page for Diane Salinger has fewer references than the Jennifer Yen submission. Also, her only references are IMDB and her personal website. How did this page get approved, but the one for Jennifer was not? Is there something I should do differently?
Thanks!
Khumpinla ( talk) 04:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for telling me you don't think the paragraph on "Brady typing" is not appearing constructive to you, but I have to say, just because you don't think is constructive doesn't means it is not to other users. Is not a good thing to let other reader knows that there's such thing on the internet. If you think that part is not constructive, oh boy you have tons and tons of pages that you have to delete, e.g. the page on the M-stock in Hong Kong MTR. Only a tiny tiny amount of people cares about that, but it still exists; on the other hand the word "Brady typing" cares buy thousands and thousands of fans of "Hello Internet", and you don't let it exist. Such logic. Mr Fat Lai ( talk) 16:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
The page I submitted although the content may appear on the Phoenix Patriot Foundation website, I AUTHORED all of the content on that website. You may, however delete the page as you see fit. Since this is my first stab at Wikipedia I understand the reason why it would be assumed that I did not author the content.
AudreyCD 17:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Please reconsider the draft as I have corrected the article and cited it properly. Prymshbmg ( talk) 14:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
1. I am familiar with BBCoding, but not this.
2. I Am Not promoting a site, but sharing a current Biblical Time on Earth, of which I have been Asked of God to do, and due to the nature of these vast, dual Sites, and God Being the Primary Source on God's New Revelations side, it may seem as a promotion. It is He Who has Brought together The Messiahs of The Third Testament, He Asks you to show Me, why you have turned this down.
He Said "Wikipedia is about old history, We are Making New History. AMEN"
3. This is My Life's Work. It is not a blog site, but the Forum Format was chosen, for as a Messiah I have no funds to present an official website. You would have noted if you had read further, that it is an Official Bible and no one is allowed to write there in replies, as they do on Facebook, but they may ask of God Questions in the private messenger area. If Jesus had this opportunity in today's age, you would have turned him down, and never had The New Testament.
4. I had intended further editing today for more clarity, but have halted all efforts. Obviously this needs more editing, but based on your initial reaction to Our Submission, it may be a wasted effort.
We have many followers on Facebook, and interact with them daily. As a Visionary Artist, some of Our Gospel Lessons are presented with My Original Art, but even with submissions this is not allowed.
We do not ask for donations. I do not sell My paintings, or the Bible. I have much to do, and have not the time to feel frustration. This is what God Gave Me for today, so you see I Am Serious as are Our people. Daily I follow God's Will.
In the future, you don't have to paste the content here
|
---|
5. “MAY 2015 Daily Diary of Events God's Living Bible - The Third Testament - Research Library - Daily Diary Of Events (God Through Anne Terri With The Holy Spirit) MAY 31, 2015 Daily Diary of Events Yesterday, after spending the day submitting Our Site to Wikipedia, you had no time left for making Vatsa Sridatta's painting, nor Selected E-mails. Do this first, then continue My Summer List below. Our site has not been accepted for Wikipedia, for they consider this as a promotion for God's Living Bible. GOD'S DAILY LIST FOR SUMMER 2015 ALWAYS Take Care of Important Correspondence World New Updates Dreams and Visions Selected E-mails Coding for Messiahs and Apostles in need for presentation within The Third Testament STUDY GUIDES IN PROGRESS 1) 1 Kings 1-8 completed Chapter 9 Started 2) The Book of Psalms 1-36 completed Chapter 37 Started 3) Proverbs (New) Chapter 1 Started 4) The Book of Isaiah 1-17 completed Next Chapter 18 Started 5) The Holy Qur'an Surahs 1-17 completed Next Surah 18 Comparison Studies 6) Study Guides - The Aquarian Gospel of Jesus Christ - The Christ of the Piscean Age 7) Vatsa Sridatta's Paintings for Teaching Hinduism – to be done every three days. Next June 3 8) Ongoing – Master CVV Namaskarams Section – Teaching of Transendental Meditation; plus ultimately the practice of TARAKA RAJA YOGA. 9) Colors of The Third Testament for The Srimad Bhagavad Gita 10)Colors of The Third Testament for The Gospel of Thomas AMEN" |
Anne Terri (
talk)
07:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thank you for creating So you want to be an AFC reviewer essay! That will help users who want to become AFC reviewers, including me! Keep doing the good work. - Supdiop talktalk 02:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC) |
@ Supdiop: Sounds good! Just take it slow at first and work your way up to the tougher cases. I still deal mostly with the easier ones at this point, but there's always something to do! /wia /talk 20:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your suggestions regarding my proposed "human excreta" article. For some background, until my proposal, the term "human excreta" was included under the "human waste" article and as a redirect to same. It is crucial to realize, however, that given the reasons I lay out in the article, while they may refer to the same material, their use (as terms) couldn't be more different. IOW one describes a "waste" material while the other describes a "resource". Since "human waste" has its own article I felt it was only right that "human excreta" has its own article as well. Please note that I modestly reworked the article and have added an additional reference (a TedX presentation), the latter of which may assist you in understanding the basis from which I am proposing the article. Now, as far as neutrality goes, I'm unclear how to improve the neutrality of an article that is in effect describing a political (and thus opinionated) concept or, said another way, a politicized term. Therefore, what ever additional assistance you can provide will be most appreciated. Thanks again. Gruster ( talk) 17:55, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Dear Wia,
Following your guidance, I have made some modifications. Can I resubmit the article now. Thank you.
Radbleu (
talk)
00:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Disambiguator's Barnstar | |
The Disambiguator's Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who are prolific disambiguators. This is for fixing 1169 ambiguous links during May 2015. Also, you are eligible for a free t-shirt from the Wikimedia Foundation. Message BD2412 if you need the details for claiming your prize. Rcsprinter123 (articulate) @ 09:20, 1 June 2015 (UTC) |
This is a decent movie with budding and forgotten actors. A wiki page would get them more opportunities. Please check the credibility by watching the movie, whose DVD is out and make a decision.
Saideepthik (
talk)
04:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, first, thanks for reviewing my article. I am taking steps to remove buzzwords and promotional language. I am not request a re-review yet until I get some clarification about my references.
You mention in your comments that "the majority of the sources in the references section don't mention SL Corporation by name at all." this may be true if you are just looking at the intro page to the articles, but there is significant coverage of SL in the full articles. But because these references are in analyst reports that require payment to access, you are not getting to the heart of the article.
As wikipedia says that "Sources do not have to be available online ", how can I show that my references are valid? These analyst reports are the most important and notable reference you can get in the tech world.
thanks for any thoughts you can spare on this.
Gfdemarest ( talk) 17:21, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey WIA - I've added another thorough 3rd party source (the Brandon Hall Group Technology Review) I hope that's enough to do the trick! Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.229.45.130 ( talk) 17:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey WIA, yes it is behind a members only paid subscription. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
207.229.45.130 (
talk)
15:34, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi there!
Thank you for shedding some light on this "not enough inline citations" stuff. To remind what you said:
″There are not enough inline citations in the draft. When you do so, take care that you are using reliable, independent (third-party) sources that discuss the subject in significant detail. Of the three links listed in your references section, two are from the subject himself (meaning they are not independent) and the third only mentions him in passing. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks, wia (talk) 02:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC)″
So I have a few questions regarding this:
This person is a musician. I thought that most reliable info must be in his official website and social media accounts. But you say that it is not objective. I'm not sure if I can find published material about a musician (conductor). What kinds of source can I use for reference? Can I use references like news from websites, past facebook events etc.? Can I use these references (news from websites, past facebook events etc.) written in Turkish for this English article?
It is my understanding that he engaged with Russian, French, Italian, Spanish, Brazilian orchestras and maybe there are sources in these languages but I don't understand these languages, so there is a little chance that I can use any source written in these languages. What can I do about this?
Thank you so much for your time.
Nefertura ( talk) 22:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Richard A. Kimball, Jr. Draft ( /info/en/?search=Draft:Richard_A._Kimball,_Jr.)
Hello Wikiisawesom,
I would like to ask as to which particular part of the draft you felt was copied? We'd like to further edit our draft with your guidance.
Thank you!
Itscamilla ( talk) 23:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I'd like to request the deletion of the draft for "Holland Electronics". There aren't any good references or sources to justify notability. My mistake for ever getting it started. Sorry. Thanks.
Mktkt (
talk)
16:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Mktkt ( talk) 16:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, you declined my submission stating that I need to cite reliable third-party sources that discuss the subject in detail. I found this article in wikipedia about Grace Evangelical Society and noticed that all the references used are also primary sources, not secondary. Can you give suggestions on how I can improve my article and get it published even if the sources are mainly primary? Thanks!
GraceTheology ( talk) 23:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Wia, I think it will be useful if there is a feature allowing us to decline a submission for multiple reasons just like we tag articles for speedies with twinkle. I know we can raise the other issues in comment but submitter may not take the comment seriously and may only fix issues, for which the draft was declined, and next time it will get declined anyway, wasting lot of time. What do you think? - Supdiop talk 14:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
The " Pyle stops" article is a "Things to do / Task Awaiting Attention" in the Portal:Underwater diving.
I developed this article to explain the Pyle Stops, however, Richards Pyle who discovered it by coincidence is not the main subject of the article. You moved this Article to "Richard Pyle's" bio, however, could you please return it back to "Pyle Stops" due to the following reasons:
I wrote some background about "Richard Pyle", necessary enough to build-up progressively the key behind the "Stops" named after him, so that the reader could progressively reach the aim of the article: which is the "Pyle Stops" that he discovered. The short introduction about Richad Pyle is necessary for the reader to know how did he reach such "Deep Stops" and that the reader finds out that the "Pyle Stop" it not based on mathematical model or research, but is a byproduct discovery by Dr. Richards after his research dives. I did not write more about Richard Pyle as a biologist or researcher, which could be a separate long article, but have only wrote what I believe is necessary to clarify the origin of the "Pyle Stops" practice, so divers could make up their minds if they decide to follow it.
I have already contacted Dr. Richard in Hawaii and invited him to review this draft with me. So, again, this article is not about "Richard Pyle", but about the "Stops" he discovered, so please move back this article to "Pyle Stops", instead of "Richard Pyle", and thanks in advance :) Yahia Mokhtar User_talk:Yahia.Mokhtar — Preceding undated comment added 09:41, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Audiofreund 13:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Hi Wikiisawesome, thanks for reading my article about Jochen Sachse. I wrote this article for the german wiki and thought it would be interesting for the english-speaking community, too. In the german wiki, there where no problems regarding the quality or significance of my references. I have spent an hour to find some more links - sadly without success. Just found a german newspaper article which was published on his companys homepage, but that is truly no third-party reference ... Could you, or somebody else of this awesome community, give me some suggestions how to make my article wiki-compatible? I thought about contacting the bands and musicians he worked for in order to get some proofs for his contribution to their work, is that an accepted reference?
The Wikipedia page Pros Vs. Heroes was denied and I am confused on what I can do to help fix it and then get it published. If you can explain what I am lacking and missing that would be great.
Kelseyburns ( talk) 18:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello- I just wanted to possibly get some tips on how to improve the page I submitted for "Bedgear." I understand that the original version submitted a few months back contained a lot of advertising language and required further references- I'm just curious if there is anything in particular that I can improve upon for a future edit since I added additional references and attempted to keep the tone neutral. I truly appreciate any help that you can provide.
Thank you
Rockyinboxersblow ( talk) 05:47, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your well-reasoned and helpful response. I think we both realize that Azur's contribution to cinematic history ranks somewhat short of stellar. I tend to agree with you on all points you raised, particularly the notability requirement. We'll simply abandon this mini-project unless you can locatelocate an interested third-party. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.102.149.248 ( talk • contribs) 17:25, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
I updated the wiki page 19 days ago; can you please re-review it and let me know if it's now ok? Thank you...
Pegmoody (
talk)
15:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Peggy Moody
Pegmoody ( talk) 15:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi - I have made a number of edits and resubmitted weeks ago. I'm not sure what can be done to expedite the process but would appreciate it the page could be approved son.
Mattyp783 (
talk)
13:09, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello - Can the Wikipedia page on 'CAI Networks' that references AVANU who acquired their products be a reliable (verifiable) reference source? Thank you.
SVTechITSec ( talk) 17:50, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
I am not sure why this keeps being denied. She has an IMDB page and a french Wiki Page. I would like one in English for her. 2602:306:CF5B:9710:64F5:A6A4:A672:AC77 ( talk) 07:00, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
I wish you the best for the future. Focus on the important things first, and smile whenever possible. Samuel Tarling ( talk) 20:00, 22 August 2015 (UTC) |
Hi Wikiisaawesome, thank you for reviewing my article! I was just wondering if you could please shed some light on what I am doing wrong? I'm so sorry, this is all new to me.
Thanks so much
Melissademetriou ( talk) 06:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Melissademetriou ( talk) 06:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I hope you will change your mind and come back to Wikipedia soon. Supdiop ( Talk🔹 Contribs) 21:36, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
I got to this page by clicking on the "ask the reviewer that declined your submission," Apologies if I should be asking elsewhere.
You rejected the article because of copyright violation(s), which I believe I have fixed.
Before re-submitting, I wanted to make sure that you thought the article met Wikipedia's notability requirements. Most of the article is sourced from one book on the artist: "Susan Seddon Boulet: A Retrospective." I was unable to find very many other citations (just a couple of interviews with the artist, only one of which is available on YouTube at this time).
There have been 4 published books (including the Retrospective book) that are wholly devoted to the artist's art and there are numerous books (7 are cited in the article) that feature her art, including a book by Ursula K. Le Guin. It would seem as if this would make her notable. However, if the article as written does not meet the notability requirements perhaps I should: 1) Not re-submit at this time until more citations are found, or; 2) Re-write and shorten the article focusing more on the content of the 4 published books featuring her art.
Any suggestions will be appreciated. Thank you in advance. Mbabco ( talk) 20:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick response. Much appreciated. Mbabco ( talk) 20:44, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cheval du Morvan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chassy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:17, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Hey there Wikkiawesome, I recently got assigned this page by my boss and have been updating it to the my ability based on your original reasons for declining. Having very little experiences updating and working on articles before it would be a great help to me if you could review it and give me breakdown of the edits I've made so far and what still needs to be done and what I am doing wrong. Thanks for all your help! :)
Hi there, thanks for reviewing my page. I am really struggling to get this through review. I have cited Companies House information as a legal, notable source of the companies history but I'm not sure what else I can do to get the page through review! I have never submitted an article to Wikipedia before and finding it quite hard! — Preceding unsigned comment added by PBernfeld ( talk • contribs) 15:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
I explained my actions over the past few days on my talk page. Please read if you want to. Thanks Supdiop ( T🔹 C) 11:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
I thought I removed the edits I made by myself but perhaps I didn't. Thanks for doing it for me. 92.1.122.227 ( talk) 09:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC) 92.1.122.227
![]() |
Welcome back! Sorry that I'm sayng this late. Rubbish computer 12:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC) |
Hi Wikiiaweseome,
If public figures have come out, and identify as LGBT, IMHO this should be noted in the very beginning. It is National Coming Out Day today, and if people have already come out in the media, they should be out on Wikipedia for the new generations of LGBT kids--particularly LGBT kids of color who get even more pressure to stay in the closet--should see this first thing. I do not know if the LGBT Wikipedia group has discussed this issue or not, but I believe it is a worthy discussion to have.
Sincerely, RachelWex — Preceding unsigned comment added by RachelWex ( talk • contribs) 15:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Wia, See your email. Cheers Supdiop ( T🔹 C) 02:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Swimming and Sky diving Walter Ascent ( talk) 16:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
thank you
Hus1234 (
talk)
14:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for keeping my user space clean of vandals. Name Omitted ( talk) 01:36, 17 May 2015 (UTC) |
My correction of the Floyd Algorithm are correct. The entire artcle needs a rewrite to be both understandable and correct. As it remains, it is confusing my students and I spend a lot of time correcting their errors gleaned from this article. This is a simple to understand algorithm when explained clearly. Instead we don't only have mathematical snobbery, but truly inaccurate information. I am SICK of wikipeadia inability to just tell wrong from write. Mathematical truth is not a matter of a VOTE. When k = 1, it is not equal to zero. Fixing this page requires a complete rewrite because the graph and the agorthms don't match and the explanation doesn't inform the reader of facts. Not having fixed these problems in the article has been called not passing a litmus test. The only litmus test here is if the article is informative and educational. It is NOT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.57.23.82 ( talk) 02:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Minkyumthemaster ( talk) 15:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Dear WIA,
Thank you for your feedback.
This is in regards to the "Comment: IMDb and Wikipedia are not reliable sources. The remaining references don't discuss Kaitlyn Dias in enough detail to prove that she's notable. They only mention her in passing, in at most one sentence. To make out notability, you'll need to find and add reliable, independent (third-party) sources that discuss the subject in significant detail. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks, wia (talk) 13:36, 24 April 2015 (UTC)"
I understand the situation, but part of the problem I am having is that she is a new comer in Pixar's up coming (june 19th) movie Inside Out, and no one has started talking about her in detail yet. I would like for them/the public to have a place (Wikipedia) that they can go to start getting accurate information on Kaitlyn.
Best Regards, RichardGDias1 ( talk) 00:17, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Richard Dias
WIA,
Agreed. We should see more press on Kaitlyn next month.
Thanks again, RichardGDias1 ( talk) 00:40, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Richard Dias
Hi Wikiisawesome! I think I got it this time-- resubmitted today…
MacMason ( talk) 06:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC) MacMason ( talk) 06:14, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi WIA,
Thanks for your feedback to my AFC for National Christian Foundation. Your notes were helpful, and I updated the verbiage in the article:
Would you mind reviewing once more? Additional feedback is welcome!
Should I resubmit? Or is notifying you enough? Since you've been sort of overseeing the article, I especially want your feedback.
Thanks in advance.
Talk soon, Copeland
Hi Wia, First of all I would like to thank you very much for the time you've taken to review my article. As for the sources, most of the article is based on a booklet written on Abdulaziz Al-Bashir, but the booklet is in Arabic. We've also taken some information from well known Arabic newspapers in Kuwait. If you would like me to scan the booklet for you, I would do so. Here are two links of newspaper articles in Arabic, but I have more.
http://alwatan.kuwait.tt/articledetails.aspx?id=414585 http://www.alqabas-kw.com/Article.aspx?id=1016865&date=15012015
Thanks again
Radbleu ( talk) 10:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
“ | The term "published" is most commonly associated with text materials, either in traditional printed format or online. However, audio, video, and multimedia materials that have been recorded then broadcast, distributed, or archived by a reputable party may also meet the necessary criteria to be considered reliable sources. Like text sources, media sources must be produced by a reliable third party and be properly cited. Additionally, an archived copy of the media must exist. It is convenient, but by no means necessary, for the archived copy to be accessible via the Internet. | ” |
Have I told you about this list? bd2412 T 19:29, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi WIA
Thanks for your comments. They are very helpful. I'm hoping you can steer me in the right direction. I had previously rewritten the History section of my draft as suggested by you previously. As suggested I didn't paraphrase, however there are some phrases that need to remain the same as the K News article because they are peoples names etc. Is there any other way around this, or any other suggestions that you might have. I really need this article to go live and am willing to make the necessary changes to do so.
Hi I have also noticed that you have pointed to JP Corrys website for copyrighting. This is actually copy I have written for submission on their website. Any suggestions? I could ask them to remove it until this article makes it through the submission process. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Debbie M Wilson ( talk • contribs) 13:53, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Thanks in advance Debbie M Wilson ( talk) 07:57, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi WIA Thanks so much for pinpointing to the issues. I have email K Rend marketing manager who has approved use of the material and submitted the links to Wikimedia commons. Fingers crossed. Debbie M Wilson ( talk) 12:56, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks Wia for your help with my first submission (Emil Milan). It is accepted now. I deleted/rewrote everything I thought could be seen as promotional or original research. But it is still tagged as sometimes a problem in those respects. Can you take another look at it? Any guidance from you would be appreciated. Thanks, Craig.
Craiger19 (
talk)
11:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Craiger19 ( talk) 11:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Dear Wia, Thank you very much for your prompt reply and constructive advice. I am including an audio file, which is a weekly radio program. This program was broadcast by the second Kuwaiti official radio station about 2 months ago, the program is well known as well as the presenter by all Kuwaitis. We received a copy from the station itself that I uploaded to dropbox. Here is the link:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sez8rpibx8r9v7k/AAB-loA920RAKFTi3uSEAxzaa?dl=0
The program has everything mentioned in the article and more. I hope will help so that we can publish the article. Thank you. Radbleu ( talk) 13:50, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
To Whom it may concern,
I am requesting a re-review as I have written this as neutral as I believe necessary. As a female architect, there is a general lack of female representation in the field prominently male. It is not my intention for the entry to read as an advertisement for Dr Maturana, I believe this may be due to many of her opinions as most of her work expresses these opinions. The book publication can also be deleted if this will help with the entry, this was a major publication for her and it seemed relevant to include but if it is against the wikipedia guidelines then I can remove it with no issue. I am happy to edit out the sections which you feel the entry is not subjective enough or rewrite sections altogether provided you feedback. I would not like to see an architect with such global influences and a history of social justice not be more freely known to all wikipedia users.
I do hoipe you reconsider or provide some feedback for a more balanced entry that you would deem appropriate for wikipedia.
Thank you
Chris Buchhorn
110.148.117.189 (
talk)
13:01, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you Wikiisawesome. I read your user description and it is really awesome. I appreciate your presence. Thank you and I still hoping that my page will approve :(. God bless. :( Systemupdate101 ( talk) 14:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC) |
![]() |
Thank you. |
Thank you for your sharing. You motivated me well. Have a nice day and God bless. I hope that you will help others also like me. Thank you. I will never forget. :) Systemupdate101 ( talk) 15:11, 23 May 2015 (UTC) |
Thanks Wia. I shortened the "Use of Wood" and "Tools and Techniques" sections and added more references. Please take another look when you can.
Craig
Craiger19 (
talk)
23:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Craiger19 ( talk) 23:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
I am the author of the copyrighted Hemodynamic Management Chart at hemodynamicsociety.org (I am the Society's Chairman). I have removed the "copyright" logo form the Chart at Wikipedia article and uploaded it under Commons, so I hope the article is now acceptable for publication.
Thanks,
Bo
Bbosramek (
talk) 01:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Bbosramek (
talk)
01:09, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
I have just remove the copyright from the corresponding web site at the hemodynamicsociety.org. Will that, together with removing the copyright symbol from Fig.10, resolve the copyright issue?
Please let me know.
Bbosramek (
talk) 01:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Bbosramek (
talk)
01:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello! I only have one source at the moment, written in Albanian. How many sources are required for this to be approved?
Albanianhistory ( talk) 14:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Dear Wia,
Thank you once again for your guidance. I added some new references and included the audio. As for the sentence "He constantly encouraged employees to enrol in training courses and higher studies, which was also a helpful element in keeping up with latest developments in the field" and The "Favorite pastime" section, they are clearly mentioned in the radio program and the booklet. But, if you think it is better that I discard them, I will.
Also Wia, I am preparing the Arabic and French versions; what is the procedure?
Thank you and enjoy what is left of the weekend.
Radbleu (
talk)
11:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I put the article through a plagiarism checker and believe that I successfully avoided plagiarism and close paraphrasing, so maybe what you used was more sensitive than the one that I used. Could you post the problematical sections on my talk page? Thanks! Stigmatella aurantiaca ( talk) 17:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Stigmatella aurantiaca ( talk) 17:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for the trouble, it was indeed meant as a user page. Found the correct path to do so now, must've misclicked somewhere when taking my first steps on my account.
Thanks for pointing out the error ;)
Maedean Shepard ( talk) 21:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Maedean Shepard ( talk) 21:41, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
teh editz 0n d4rk m4tt3r?????? oneoneone :(111-- 68.168.122.157 ( talk) 23:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)-- 68.168.122.157 ( talk) 23:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)-- 68.168.122.157 ( talk) 23:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Why Did you delete my analysis on the Uniquely American Human Right Self Defense what's protected by the 2nd Amendment ? 1) are you an American ?
That's a lot to read. Could you be more specific ?
Wikiisawesome - --- I'm not being disruptive. It's a uniquely American Human Right to be able to defend Self. You have a Self so stand tall and defend Self. We all do have this tight to be able to defend self from rape/murder which are violations of self. Get the point please. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ai6pg ( talk • contribs) 04:52, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Reputable is based on Natural Law. You have Self given by God and, he does want you defend it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ai6pg ( talk • contribs) 18:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Well I faxed my interpretation and vision to Congress and, I hope they will work to fix it. It's in the Bill of Rights. Now if you are an American, I hope you will see what I'm trying to do and raise the bar a bit, and it would be good for the economy too. As you know Rape and Murder are evil, and as an American, we do have a right to defend Self from it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ai6pg ( talk • contribs) 23:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Yeah I agree not really constructive. Im from the area. Fact is no one lives on the islands. They are tiny little sandy islands where people pull up boats and party. So while what I said is indeed true, I guess there are more eloquent ways to describe what goes on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.117.84.163 ( talk) 22:44, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
I understand you have rejected a new article on "Regression Therapy" and have suggested that it is included in an existing article on "Past Life Regression". I would like you to reconsider this decision the following reasons;
Regression Therapy is a separate discipline of therapy drawing on many healing modularities; age regression, inner child regression, body therapy, transpersonal experiences, and If stories emerge from a client that appear to be past lives they are dealt with as healing metaphors. Thats was clearly stated in the article. This is completely different from past life regression which is about allowing people having just "past life experiences" which they may think are real.
Past Life Regression is a controversial subject open to different religious and cultural views and the article is subject to may changes and disputes. Not an area I wish to enter.
Regression therapy is practiced by medical doctors and therapists working to a clearly defined international standard. It has thousands of therapists across the world doing this work. As such it deserves respect from Wikipedia to have an article covering this work.
The article on Regression Therapy has been written to provide notability and verification to meet Wikipedia standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy Tomlinson ( talk • contribs) 09:48, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
My submission was rejected because "the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Marsh & McLennan Companies instead." Marsh and Marsh & McLennan companies are separate entities. Marsh and McLennan companies is the parent company of Marsh LLC. We share history but they are separate and distinct entities.
Could you please let me know what I need to do get the Marsh page published?
Paid2Tweet (
talk)
13:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I tried a different plagiarism checker (Grammarly). The lede passed Grammarly, but you're right, the Instrument section looks problematical. Give me a day to work on it.
Stigmatella aurantiaca ( talk) 17:30, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Search the supplied link, http://emmyonline.org/mediacenter/sports_34th_winners.html Jeff Kalvin is listed. It is properly referenced. Misterhandsfriend ( talk) 15:29, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello there,
So I created a new article and submitted for review. You mentioned I need more reliable references. Question is, references must be in English or any language will do? Tnks a million ;-) Mironit9 ( talk) 19:19, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Mironit9
To add references:
Dear Wikiiawesome,
thanks for your feedback re my proposed article "European research and innovation for environment: policy and actions"
/info/en/?search=Draft:European_research_and_innovation_for_environment:_policy_and_actions#More_information_about_the_European_research_and_innovation_for_environment_policy
Could you please help by pointing out which paragraphs you consider copied from a report? Many thanks, Monica Soniamo ( talk) 16:43, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
19:14] <+topaz> soniamo: I think I agree that this is an "edge case" and that the instnaces of copied material don't constitute copyright infringement
So I am working with topaz and we will submit it again. if you have other comments, please let me know
Thanks, Monica
@ Soniamo: Sorry for the late reply. I think the copying issue from the europa site you linked above has been dealt with. Once you've finished cleaning up the article, you can resubmit it and an AFC reviewer will be along in the coming weeks to take another look. Thanks, /wia /talk 23:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi - I am trying to add a new Wikipedia page for Jennifer Yen, and it was rejected due to insufficient sources. Jennifer played Vypra in the Power Rangers. I was looking at the Power Rangers page,
/info/en/?search=Power_Rangers_Lightspeed_Rescue, and then at another one of the villian's wikipedia page,
/info/en/?search=Diane_Salinger -- it looks like the page for Diane Salinger has fewer references than the Jennifer Yen submission. Also, her only references are IMDB and her personal website. How did this page get approved, but the one for Jennifer was not? Is there something I should do differently?
Thanks!
Khumpinla ( talk) 04:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for telling me you don't think the paragraph on "Brady typing" is not appearing constructive to you, but I have to say, just because you don't think is constructive doesn't means it is not to other users. Is not a good thing to let other reader knows that there's such thing on the internet. If you think that part is not constructive, oh boy you have tons and tons of pages that you have to delete, e.g. the page on the M-stock in Hong Kong MTR. Only a tiny tiny amount of people cares about that, but it still exists; on the other hand the word "Brady typing" cares buy thousands and thousands of fans of "Hello Internet", and you don't let it exist. Such logic. Mr Fat Lai ( talk) 16:23, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
The page I submitted although the content may appear on the Phoenix Patriot Foundation website, I AUTHORED all of the content on that website. You may, however delete the page as you see fit. Since this is my first stab at Wikipedia I understand the reason why it would be assumed that I did not author the content.
AudreyCD 17:15, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Please reconsider the draft as I have corrected the article and cited it properly. Prymshbmg ( talk) 14:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
1. I am familiar with BBCoding, but not this.
2. I Am Not promoting a site, but sharing a current Biblical Time on Earth, of which I have been Asked of God to do, and due to the nature of these vast, dual Sites, and God Being the Primary Source on God's New Revelations side, it may seem as a promotion. It is He Who has Brought together The Messiahs of The Third Testament, He Asks you to show Me, why you have turned this down.
He Said "Wikipedia is about old history, We are Making New History. AMEN"
3. This is My Life's Work. It is not a blog site, but the Forum Format was chosen, for as a Messiah I have no funds to present an official website. You would have noted if you had read further, that it is an Official Bible and no one is allowed to write there in replies, as they do on Facebook, but they may ask of God Questions in the private messenger area. If Jesus had this opportunity in today's age, you would have turned him down, and never had The New Testament.
4. I had intended further editing today for more clarity, but have halted all efforts. Obviously this needs more editing, but based on your initial reaction to Our Submission, it may be a wasted effort.
We have many followers on Facebook, and interact with them daily. As a Visionary Artist, some of Our Gospel Lessons are presented with My Original Art, but even with submissions this is not allowed.
We do not ask for donations. I do not sell My paintings, or the Bible. I have much to do, and have not the time to feel frustration. This is what God Gave Me for today, so you see I Am Serious as are Our people. Daily I follow God's Will.
In the future, you don't have to paste the content here
|
---|
5. “MAY 2015 Daily Diary of Events God's Living Bible - The Third Testament - Research Library - Daily Diary Of Events (God Through Anne Terri With The Holy Spirit) MAY 31, 2015 Daily Diary of Events Yesterday, after spending the day submitting Our Site to Wikipedia, you had no time left for making Vatsa Sridatta's painting, nor Selected E-mails. Do this first, then continue My Summer List below. Our site has not been accepted for Wikipedia, for they consider this as a promotion for God's Living Bible. GOD'S DAILY LIST FOR SUMMER 2015 ALWAYS Take Care of Important Correspondence World New Updates Dreams and Visions Selected E-mails Coding for Messiahs and Apostles in need for presentation within The Third Testament STUDY GUIDES IN PROGRESS 1) 1 Kings 1-8 completed Chapter 9 Started 2) The Book of Psalms 1-36 completed Chapter 37 Started 3) Proverbs (New) Chapter 1 Started 4) The Book of Isaiah 1-17 completed Next Chapter 18 Started 5) The Holy Qur'an Surahs 1-17 completed Next Surah 18 Comparison Studies 6) Study Guides - The Aquarian Gospel of Jesus Christ - The Christ of the Piscean Age 7) Vatsa Sridatta's Paintings for Teaching Hinduism – to be done every three days. Next June 3 8) Ongoing – Master CVV Namaskarams Section – Teaching of Transendental Meditation; plus ultimately the practice of TARAKA RAJA YOGA. 9) Colors of The Third Testament for The Srimad Bhagavad Gita 10)Colors of The Third Testament for The Gospel of Thomas AMEN" |
Anne Terri (
talk)
07:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thank you for creating So you want to be an AFC reviewer essay! That will help users who want to become AFC reviewers, including me! Keep doing the good work. - Supdiop talktalk 02:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC) |
@ Supdiop: Sounds good! Just take it slow at first and work your way up to the tougher cases. I still deal mostly with the easier ones at this point, but there's always something to do! /wia /talk 20:28, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your suggestions regarding my proposed "human excreta" article. For some background, until my proposal, the term "human excreta" was included under the "human waste" article and as a redirect to same. It is crucial to realize, however, that given the reasons I lay out in the article, while they may refer to the same material, their use (as terms) couldn't be more different. IOW one describes a "waste" material while the other describes a "resource". Since "human waste" has its own article I felt it was only right that "human excreta" has its own article as well. Please note that I modestly reworked the article and have added an additional reference (a TedX presentation), the latter of which may assist you in understanding the basis from which I am proposing the article. Now, as far as neutrality goes, I'm unclear how to improve the neutrality of an article that is in effect describing a political (and thus opinionated) concept or, said another way, a politicized term. Therefore, what ever additional assistance you can provide will be most appreciated. Thanks again. Gruster ( talk) 17:55, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Dear Wia,
Following your guidance, I have made some modifications. Can I resubmit the article now. Thank you.
Radbleu (
talk)
00:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Disambiguator's Barnstar | |
The Disambiguator's Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who are prolific disambiguators. This is for fixing 1169 ambiguous links during May 2015. Also, you are eligible for a free t-shirt from the Wikimedia Foundation. Message BD2412 if you need the details for claiming your prize. Rcsprinter123 (articulate) @ 09:20, 1 June 2015 (UTC) |
This is a decent movie with budding and forgotten actors. A wiki page would get them more opportunities. Please check the credibility by watching the movie, whose DVD is out and make a decision.
Saideepthik (
talk)
04:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, first, thanks for reviewing my article. I am taking steps to remove buzzwords and promotional language. I am not request a re-review yet until I get some clarification about my references.
You mention in your comments that "the majority of the sources in the references section don't mention SL Corporation by name at all." this may be true if you are just looking at the intro page to the articles, but there is significant coverage of SL in the full articles. But because these references are in analyst reports that require payment to access, you are not getting to the heart of the article.
As wikipedia says that "Sources do not have to be available online ", how can I show that my references are valid? These analyst reports are the most important and notable reference you can get in the tech world.
thanks for any thoughts you can spare on this.
Gfdemarest ( talk) 17:21, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Hey WIA - I've added another thorough 3rd party source (the Brandon Hall Group Technology Review) I hope that's enough to do the trick! Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.229.45.130 ( talk) 17:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Hey WIA, yes it is behind a members only paid subscription. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
207.229.45.130 (
talk)
15:34, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi there!
Thank you for shedding some light on this "not enough inline citations" stuff. To remind what you said:
″There are not enough inline citations in the draft. When you do so, take care that you are using reliable, independent (third-party) sources that discuss the subject in significant detail. Of the three links listed in your references section, two are from the subject himself (meaning they are not independent) and the third only mentions him in passing. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks, wia (talk) 02:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC)″
So I have a few questions regarding this:
This person is a musician. I thought that most reliable info must be in his official website and social media accounts. But you say that it is not objective. I'm not sure if I can find published material about a musician (conductor). What kinds of source can I use for reference? Can I use references like news from websites, past facebook events etc.? Can I use these references (news from websites, past facebook events etc.) written in Turkish for this English article?
It is my understanding that he engaged with Russian, French, Italian, Spanish, Brazilian orchestras and maybe there are sources in these languages but I don't understand these languages, so there is a little chance that I can use any source written in these languages. What can I do about this?
Thank you so much for your time.
Nefertura ( talk) 22:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Richard A. Kimball, Jr. Draft ( /info/en/?search=Draft:Richard_A._Kimball,_Jr.)
Hello Wikiisawesom,
I would like to ask as to which particular part of the draft you felt was copied? We'd like to further edit our draft with your guidance.
Thank you!
Itscamilla ( talk) 23:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I'd like to request the deletion of the draft for "Holland Electronics". There aren't any good references or sources to justify notability. My mistake for ever getting it started. Sorry. Thanks.
Mktkt (
talk)
16:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Mktkt ( talk) 16:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi, you declined my submission stating that I need to cite reliable third-party sources that discuss the subject in detail. I found this article in wikipedia about Grace Evangelical Society and noticed that all the references used are also primary sources, not secondary. Can you give suggestions on how I can improve my article and get it published even if the sources are mainly primary? Thanks!
GraceTheology ( talk) 23:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi Wia, I think it will be useful if there is a feature allowing us to decline a submission for multiple reasons just like we tag articles for speedies with twinkle. I know we can raise the other issues in comment but submitter may not take the comment seriously and may only fix issues, for which the draft was declined, and next time it will get declined anyway, wasting lot of time. What do you think? - Supdiop talk 14:12, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
The " Pyle stops" article is a "Things to do / Task Awaiting Attention" in the Portal:Underwater diving.
I developed this article to explain the Pyle Stops, however, Richards Pyle who discovered it by coincidence is not the main subject of the article. You moved this Article to "Richard Pyle's" bio, however, could you please return it back to "Pyle Stops" due to the following reasons:
I wrote some background about "Richard Pyle", necessary enough to build-up progressively the key behind the "Stops" named after him, so that the reader could progressively reach the aim of the article: which is the "Pyle Stops" that he discovered. The short introduction about Richad Pyle is necessary for the reader to know how did he reach such "Deep Stops" and that the reader finds out that the "Pyle Stop" it not based on mathematical model or research, but is a byproduct discovery by Dr. Richards after his research dives. I did not write more about Richard Pyle as a biologist or researcher, which could be a separate long article, but have only wrote what I believe is necessary to clarify the origin of the "Pyle Stops" practice, so divers could make up their minds if they decide to follow it.
I have already contacted Dr. Richard in Hawaii and invited him to review this draft with me. So, again, this article is not about "Richard Pyle", but about the "Stops" he discovered, so please move back this article to "Pyle Stops", instead of "Richard Pyle", and thanks in advance :) Yahia Mokhtar User_talk:Yahia.Mokhtar — Preceding undated comment added 09:41, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Audiofreund 13:44, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Hi Wikiisawesome, thanks for reading my article about Jochen Sachse. I wrote this article for the german wiki and thought it would be interesting for the english-speaking community, too. In the german wiki, there where no problems regarding the quality or significance of my references. I have spent an hour to find some more links - sadly without success. Just found a german newspaper article which was published on his companys homepage, but that is truly no third-party reference ... Could you, or somebody else of this awesome community, give me some suggestions how to make my article wiki-compatible? I thought about contacting the bands and musicians he worked for in order to get some proofs for his contribution to their work, is that an accepted reference?
The Wikipedia page Pros Vs. Heroes was denied and I am confused on what I can do to help fix it and then get it published. If you can explain what I am lacking and missing that would be great.
Kelseyburns ( talk) 18:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello- I just wanted to possibly get some tips on how to improve the page I submitted for "Bedgear." I understand that the original version submitted a few months back contained a lot of advertising language and required further references- I'm just curious if there is anything in particular that I can improve upon for a future edit since I added additional references and attempted to keep the tone neutral. I truly appreciate any help that you can provide.
Thank you
Rockyinboxersblow ( talk) 05:47, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your well-reasoned and helpful response. I think we both realize that Azur's contribution to cinematic history ranks somewhat short of stellar. I tend to agree with you on all points you raised, particularly the notability requirement. We'll simply abandon this mini-project unless you can locatelocate an interested third-party. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.102.149.248 ( talk • contribs) 17:25, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
I updated the wiki page 19 days ago; can you please re-review it and let me know if it's now ok? Thank you...
Pegmoody (
talk)
15:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Peggy Moody
Pegmoody ( talk) 15:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi - I have made a number of edits and resubmitted weeks ago. I'm not sure what can be done to expedite the process but would appreciate it the page could be approved son.
Mattyp783 (
talk)
13:09, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello - Can the Wikipedia page on 'CAI Networks' that references AVANU who acquired their products be a reliable (verifiable) reference source? Thank you.
SVTechITSec ( talk) 17:50, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
I am not sure why this keeps being denied. She has an IMDB page and a french Wiki Page. I would like one in English for her. 2602:306:CF5B:9710:64F5:A6A4:A672:AC77 ( talk) 07:00, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
I wish you the best for the future. Focus on the important things first, and smile whenever possible. Samuel Tarling ( talk) 20:00, 22 August 2015 (UTC) |
Hi Wikiisaawesome, thank you for reviewing my article! I was just wondering if you could please shed some light on what I am doing wrong? I'm so sorry, this is all new to me.
Thanks so much
Melissademetriou ( talk) 06:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Melissademetriou ( talk) 06:06, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I hope you will change your mind and come back to Wikipedia soon. Supdiop ( Talk🔹 Contribs) 21:36, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
I got to this page by clicking on the "ask the reviewer that declined your submission," Apologies if I should be asking elsewhere.
You rejected the article because of copyright violation(s), which I believe I have fixed.
Before re-submitting, I wanted to make sure that you thought the article met Wikipedia's notability requirements. Most of the article is sourced from one book on the artist: "Susan Seddon Boulet: A Retrospective." I was unable to find very many other citations (just a couple of interviews with the artist, only one of which is available on YouTube at this time).
There have been 4 published books (including the Retrospective book) that are wholly devoted to the artist's art and there are numerous books (7 are cited in the article) that feature her art, including a book by Ursula K. Le Guin. It would seem as if this would make her notable. However, if the article as written does not meet the notability requirements perhaps I should: 1) Not re-submit at this time until more citations are found, or; 2) Re-write and shorten the article focusing more on the content of the 4 published books featuring her art.
Any suggestions will be appreciated. Thank you in advance. Mbabco ( talk) 20:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick response. Much appreciated. Mbabco ( talk) 20:44, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cheval du Morvan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chassy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:17, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Hey there Wikkiawesome, I recently got assigned this page by my boss and have been updating it to the my ability based on your original reasons for declining. Having very little experiences updating and working on articles before it would be a great help to me if you could review it and give me breakdown of the edits I've made so far and what still needs to be done and what I am doing wrong. Thanks for all your help! :)
Hi there, thanks for reviewing my page. I am really struggling to get this through review. I have cited Companies House information as a legal, notable source of the companies history but I'm not sure what else I can do to get the page through review! I have never submitted an article to Wikipedia before and finding it quite hard! — Preceding unsigned comment added by PBernfeld ( talk • contribs) 15:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
I explained my actions over the past few days on my talk page. Please read if you want to. Thanks Supdiop ( T🔹 C) 11:06, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
I thought I removed the edits I made by myself but perhaps I didn't. Thanks for doing it for me. 92.1.122.227 ( talk) 09:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC) 92.1.122.227
![]() |
Welcome back! Sorry that I'm sayng this late. Rubbish computer 12:36, 11 October 2015 (UTC) |
Hi Wikiiaweseome,
If public figures have come out, and identify as LGBT, IMHO this should be noted in the very beginning. It is National Coming Out Day today, and if people have already come out in the media, they should be out on Wikipedia for the new generations of LGBT kids--particularly LGBT kids of color who get even more pressure to stay in the closet--should see this first thing. I do not know if the LGBT Wikipedia group has discussed this issue or not, but I believe it is a worthy discussion to have.
Sincerely, RachelWex — Preceding unsigned comment added by RachelWex ( talk • contribs) 15:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Wia, See your email. Cheers Supdiop ( T🔹 C) 02:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Swimming and Sky diving Walter Ascent ( talk) 16:12, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
thank you
Hus1234 (
talk)
14:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)