Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Isaac has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Hello everybody! DinkyExpress ( talk) 07:15, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edits to
Amanda Eliasch do not have an
edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, even if it is very brief, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.
The edit summary appears in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Sionk ( talk) 13:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Waldhorn. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Mother Teresa, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. —
Waldhorn (
talk)
16:03, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Verydinky, are you Amanda? I was talking about the article as trashy, which indeed it was, not yourself. I would never in the least call anybody trashy, since I've got too much respect for folks, who most of the time are trying to do their best. scope_creep talk 12:49 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in
Articles for deletion debates, as you did with
Amanda Eliasch. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please
comment at the respective page instead. You may not remove the AfD template -- whatever the merits of the case.
Favonian (
talk)
20:18, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Pablo Ganguli, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you. --
Finngall
talk
15:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Isaac has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Hello everybody! DinkyExpress ( talk) 07:15, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edits to
Amanda Eliasch do not have an
edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, even if it is very brief, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.
The edit summary appears in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Sionk ( talk) 13:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Waldhorn. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Mother Teresa, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. —
Waldhorn (
talk)
16:03, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi Verydinky, are you Amanda? I was talking about the article as trashy, which indeed it was, not yourself. I would never in the least call anybody trashy, since I've got too much respect for folks, who most of the time are trying to do their best. scope_creep talk 12:49 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in
Articles for deletion debates, as you did with
Amanda Eliasch. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please
comment at the respective page instead. You may not remove the AfD template -- whatever the merits of the case.
Favonian (
talk)
20:18, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Pablo Ganguli, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the
sandbox for that. Thank you. --
Finngall
talk
15:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)