Please note: I remove disruptive comments from this talk page.
Welcome!
Hello, UweBayern, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
Vlad|
->
13:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Your solo action was not appreciated. Please see the talk page. -- KarlFrei ( talk) 16:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
I think, there is quite a few issues with your edit at the above article. First of all, a fair bit of data was lost by replacing the old table with your new one, copied accross from the German wikipedia, and secondly, it left a couple of names red linked even so there are articles about those people, these being Johannes Hoffmann and Heinrich Held. You need to check your work after you have done it, I think. Thirdly, its common practise on the English wikipedia to leave an edit summary. I don't edit much on the German version so I don't know what is custom there, you may be used to a different set of rules. EA210269 ( talk) 03:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
you are being disruptive by giving undue weight to a minor aspect of a biography of a living person which violates both WP:BLP and WP:SOAPBOX. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 08:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Chris Brown (entertainer). Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. —
Σ
xplicit
22:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
What are you talking about? Loosmark ( talk) 14:26, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Your removal of a category and other relevant additions to the expulsion article. UweBayern ( talk) 14:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Federation of Expellees. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
User:Piotrus has already attempted to start a discussion at the article's talk page; you would be wise to continue discussion there rather than to keep on reverting the article. Once a disagreement like this has arisen, it is not appropriate for editors to keep undoing one another's edits—even if you are thoroughly convinced that your version is right, you must seek consensus from other involved editors. If you continue edit warring, you will be blocked. rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 18:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Hans Krüger. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing. \
Backslash Forwardslash / (
talk)
08:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello UweBayern! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an
Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The
biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
verifiability, all biographies should be based on
reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
868 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 19:55, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Category:Members of the Bavarian Order of Merit has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Sitacuisses ( talk) 13:08, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weingut Reichsrat von Buhl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Please note: I remove disruptive comments from this talk page.
Welcome!
Hello, UweBayern, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
Vlad|
->
13:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Your solo action was not appreciated. Please see the talk page. -- KarlFrei ( talk) 16:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
I think, there is quite a few issues with your edit at the above article. First of all, a fair bit of data was lost by replacing the old table with your new one, copied accross from the German wikipedia, and secondly, it left a couple of names red linked even so there are articles about those people, these being Johannes Hoffmann and Heinrich Held. You need to check your work after you have done it, I think. Thirdly, its common practise on the English wikipedia to leave an edit summary. I don't edit much on the German version so I don't know what is custom there, you may be used to a different set of rules. EA210269 ( talk) 03:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
you are being disruptive by giving undue weight to a minor aspect of a biography of a living person which violates both WP:BLP and WP:SOAPBOX. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 08:09, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Chris Brown (entertainer). Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. —
Σ
xplicit
22:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
What are you talking about? Loosmark ( talk) 14:26, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Your removal of a category and other relevant additions to the expulsion article. UweBayern ( talk) 14:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Federation of Expellees. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing.
User:Piotrus has already attempted to start a discussion at the article's talk page; you would be wise to continue discussion there rather than to keep on reverting the article. Once a disagreement like this has arisen, it is not appropriate for editors to keep undoing one another's edits—even if you are thoroughly convinced that your version is right, you must seek consensus from other involved editors. If you continue edit warring, you will be blocked. rʨanaɢ talk/ contribs 18:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Hans Krüger. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing. \
Backslash Forwardslash / (
talk)
08:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello UweBayern! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an
Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The
biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
verifiability, all biographies should be based on
reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
868 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{
unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 19:55, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Category:Members of the Bavarian Order of Merit has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. Sitacuisses ( talk) 13:08, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weingut Reichsrat von Buhl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.