I think that info about bases in abkhazia and ossetia should be inserted together in one piece - Georgia, it's logically cause both of them are disputed by the one country
This is your only warning; if you
use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at
List of countries with overseas military bases and
List of Russian military bases abroad, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Iryna Harpy (
talk)
04:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
а не логично ли абхазию и осетию вписать в одну графу "грузия"? ну и плюс со скобочек предложения неправильно начинать
Hi, i noticed this edit changing a stub category from Ukraine to Russia, for a Crimea-located historic palace. I figure that is political/contentious. Maybe a compromise is to put it as a Crimea stub, i wonder, but I'm not up to speed on consensus in this area. Can you explain and/or point me to current Wikipedia policy/practice on this topic? Cheers, -- do ncr am 16:00, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Hey, Iryna Harpy's post links first to an ANI discussion which I thought at first was a live discussion, and only later do I notice the last comment was on February 16 and that the discussion was archived. I was going to give some comments in the ANI, but will just drop them here with some more thoughts:
Thanks Iryna Harpy for the ping. I hope that more communication is going on now, hope there's respect for other editors' perspectives, both ways. Cheers, -- do ncr am 05:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Diannaa ( talk) 19:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Xx234 ( talk) 07:52, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at
List of countries with overseas military bases.
Iryna Harpy (
talk)
00:18, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
Russia, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Iryna Harpy (
talk)
06:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Iryna Harpy ( talk) 23:12, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Iryna Harpy ( talk) 23:32, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at List of Russian military bases abroad shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Iryna Harpy (
talk)
05:21, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
I see you open a discussion about allied order in talk page of Allies of World War II. Actually the original allied order is USSR first. The link of the original version is [1].This is the same order in original version of main article world war II which is [2].This order is based on many discussions about World War II. One of the discussion is [3]. The country list of World War II has been removed from main page World War II based on the consensus of Talk:World War II/Archive 51#Request for comment: WWII infobox. The order in Allies of World War II was changed by E-960 [4] without discussion in that time. Then this order is insisted by E-960, Calidum and some other users. This is how the current order comes from. I see another discussion about this order Talk:Allies of World War II/Archive 9#POV/NPOV but did not change the current order. Basically, I guess no one will continue the discussion about order dispute.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
User:Ymblanter (
talk)
08:29, 19 April 2019 (UTC)I think that info about bases in abkhazia and ossetia should be inserted together in one piece - Georgia, it's logically cause both of them are disputed by the one country
This is your only warning; if you
use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at
List of countries with overseas military bases and
List of Russian military bases abroad, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Iryna Harpy (
talk)
04:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
а не логично ли абхазию и осетию вписать в одну графу "грузия"? ну и плюс со скобочек предложения неправильно начинать
Hi, i noticed this edit changing a stub category from Ukraine to Russia, for a Crimea-located historic palace. I figure that is political/contentious. Maybe a compromise is to put it as a Crimea stub, i wonder, but I'm not up to speed on consensus in this area. Can you explain and/or point me to current Wikipedia policy/practice on this topic? Cheers, -- do ncr am 16:00, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Hey, Iryna Harpy's post links first to an ANI discussion which I thought at first was a live discussion, and only later do I notice the last comment was on February 16 and that the discussion was archived. I was going to give some comments in the ANI, but will just drop them here with some more thoughts:
Thanks Iryna Harpy for the ping. I hope that more communication is going on now, hope there's respect for other editors' perspectives, both ways. Cheers, -- do ncr am 05:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Diannaa ( talk) 19:37, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Xx234 ( talk) 07:52, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at
List of countries with overseas military bases.
Iryna Harpy (
talk)
00:18, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
Russia, did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Iryna Harpy (
talk)
06:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Iryna Harpy ( talk) 23:12, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
Iryna Harpy ( talk) 23:32, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at List of Russian military bases abroad shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Iryna Harpy (
talk)
05:21, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
I see you open a discussion about allied order in talk page of Allies of World War II. Actually the original allied order is USSR first. The link of the original version is [1].This is the same order in original version of main article world war II which is [2].This order is based on many discussions about World War II. One of the discussion is [3]. The country list of World War II has been removed from main page World War II based on the consensus of Talk:World War II/Archive 51#Request for comment: WWII infobox. The order in Allies of World War II was changed by E-960 [4] without discussion in that time. Then this order is insisted by E-960, Calidum and some other users. This is how the current order comes from. I see another discussion about this order Talk:Allies of World War II/Archive 9#POV/NPOV but did not change the current order. Basically, I guess no one will continue the discussion about order dispute.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
User:Ymblanter (
talk)
08:29, 19 April 2019 (UTC)