This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Great job! -- BarkerJr ( talk) 03:36, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/January 2009#Tothwolf. SoxBot X ( talk) 04:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
I have 1 granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 14:09, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
Can you provide a test case for the problem you were trying to fix here? Navbox templates shouldn't need blank lines (or comments) to fix formatting errors. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. It wasn't really important; I just needed to take out some trivial/biased info (which I easily redid). :) SKS2K6 ( talk) 21:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for editing. Ribeka&Presario —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ribeka&Presario ( talk • contribs) 17:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I think I've seen your name pop up in AfD's and/or COI discussions. If you have a second can you please give me a hand with an active incident involving multiple Gliese IT SPAs? -- samj in out 15:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
My nomination of the article for AfD first of all did not do anything to disrupt Wikipedia, nor was it an attempt to disrupt Wikipedia, nor was it an attempt to prove a point. There was sound rationale for my nomination, as plenty of other editors noted - specifically see JohnCD's reference to precedent. Yes, I have had a negative opinion of Wikipedia, but I blanked my thoughts on that because my opinion , while not completely changed, is changing, and I have continued to make constructive edits, what's more I have demonstrated collaborate spirit even in dissent (see the log for Poe Elementary School, Houston as well as my interaction with Whisper to Me) and have cheerfully accepted and learned from others' comments (see my response to Post Oak on the Nottingham Forest Talk page). Your comment referring me to WP:POINT was not only not relevent, it was uncalled-for, and dredging up an old deleted comment of mine from my own User Page is a biased attempt to discredit me and smacks of wikistalking. I respectfully but firmly request that you edit your comments to make them more neutral. Mmyers1976 ( talk) 15:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, because of the incivility issues, I have opened a Civility Complaint at WP:WQA, thanks. Mmyers1976 ( talk) 17:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nottingham Forest, Houston. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Beeblebrox ( talk) 17:54, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I added the SPA template to his statement because it is a single purpose account. Look at the user contribution as you did mine. If you like to link to edits of mine you want backed up fill free. 16x9 ( talk) 20:36, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Which article and reference are you referring too? 16x9 ( talk) 02:11, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Source what material? I have found no reliable sources. How did I treat Meskalyto any in way inappropriately as I have NEVER spoken to him. 16x9 ( talk) 18:31, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acrophobia (game). Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MLauba ( talk) 23:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
It's ok, no harm done. Acebulf ( talk) 23:26, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
MLauba ( talk) 23:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
MLauba ( talk) 23:38, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
My mistake. A tool I used brought up that page since it falls in Category:Online games, and I tagged it too quickly. MrKIA11 ( talk) 15:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Killiondude ( talk) 06:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Replied on my talk page. – AB C D ✉ 07:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
(break)
I assume that this is a follow up to the
discussion on
Black Falcon's talk page.
1. I've not heard from MZMcBride myself yet. The courteous thing to do would be to let him deal with his ARB situation before opening another can of worms. (The fact that people are using IRC for discussing this specific issue is both ironic and troubling due to the lack of transparency.)
2. The only person who is pushing for these to be "upmerged" is you. Are you then planning to go after
Category:Wikipedians who use XChat too? If it comes down to it, there will be a DRV and although you seem to have already concluded it would go in your favor, I'd suggest you step back and take another view of this situation because you aren't looking at the full picture. Note that if it does take a DRV to deal with this, it will make it crystal clear that you are indeed violating
WP:POINT.
3. Clearly you are not familiar with the differences in IRC clients or you would not have continued this line of discussion once things were made clear on
Black Falcon's talk page. Wikipedia has no precedents and I can see no reason for a precedent from the list you linked to. In fact, I see no IRC client software in that list at all. (Note that Spamcop isn't even software, they provide a
DNSBL service.)
Rehash: The
Category:Wikipedians who use irssi,
Category:Wikipedians who use mIRC (and
Category:Wikipedians who use IRC) categories were depopulated and not in use when you originally proposed that they be upmerged/deleted. (Note that right now both categories are smaller than they were due to Userpages already being upmerged into
Category:Wikipedians who use IRC.) I've since fixed the userbox templates and added documentation on how to use the categories on the category pages themselves. At the time you proposed they be merged/deleted they were indeed underused and not very helpful. This is no longer the case.
This is getting to the point of
WP:STICK and it's using up the free time I normally devote to working on articles...
--
Tothwolf (
talk)
13:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
The close was correct and will not be overturned (by me, at least). Though, you're free to try Deletion review. Having individual categories for each IRC client makes no sense, a view that the community agrees with as demonstrated by the debate in December. Either move on or file a deletion review. Threats of Arbitration or any similar silliness will not be tolerated. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 01:34, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: your threats [3] [4], I've done nothing wrong. If you feel you need to bring something to AN/I or Arbcom, I certainly can't stop you. I'll note that Arbcom is supposed to be the last step of dispute resolution so I (and I imagine others as well) would find filing any sort of Arbcom complaint highly inappropriate. VegaDark ( talk) 02:47, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
I saw this and thought I would give my opinion. I think you should either go to DRV with this one or drop it. DRV is the process designed to review CFD closures and none of the alternatives you have suggested seem appropriate. Just a friendly note, — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 11:17, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your help with the Prosystem. Jack of All Trades ~Wolf~ ( talk) 23:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by MSGJ ( talk • contribs) 10:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
{{Wikipedia books|Love}}
Hey, this is my favorite new box! Don't forget to add these new templates to
Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia-Books#Templates :-)
RichardF (
talk)
01:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
I answered on my talk page. Thanks for your initial notice on that issue! Yarcanox ( talk) 11:43, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
OK, you're right. I found another way to prevent for extra lines. thx for that link. mabdul 17:06, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
It is likely we are going to do a test run for 2 weeks with the following parameters. (to gather stats and an overall feel of wether this wouls work in general)
Sites: Youtube
Actions: Warn, tag
User Group: Non-Autoconfirmed (New and anonymous users)
We will be removing youtube from the XLinkbot revert list for the duration of the test. If I recall your main quam with a filter was it applying to regulers users, I hope this addresses your concerns. Cheers «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 14:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
I have blocked the IP that removed the material for a longer period, next time they will get a much longer block. As it is only this one IP this time I am reluctant to semi protect it until and unless that situation changes. I will watch it also and let me know if other IPs start the same pattern of vandalism. Mfield ( Oi!) 16:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
You stated at multiple points that ithildin would be still commonly in use. I got interested in that ircd and googled a bit for it and wasn't able to find any other page about it than ithildin.org itself, which seems down. I searched a bit more and came across one server name of darkmyst.org which contained "ithildin", connected and noticed it runs an ithildin server. So this is at least one place where it is still used, but still I think that the net doesn't have any valuable information about this ircd, especially as there is virtually no other site talking about it and the main page down, makes it hard to list it on wikipedia as there are no real sources. I am just attempting to talk to those darkmyst people to find a bit more of the whereabouts of this ircd (Update while writing this text: at least there still seem to be some developers around. I'll ask them if the page will ever be back online). Yarcanox ( talk) 19:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
This may help you:
Finding sources which mention the topic of this article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{ Findsources3}}:
Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:
If the page you edited is deleted, you also
have many options available. Good luck!
Ikip (
talk)
15:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Tothwolf. You have been invited to join the Article Rescue Squadron, a collaborative effort to rescue articles from deletion if they can be improved through regular editing. For more information, please visit the project page, where you can >> join << and help rescue articles tagged for deletion and rescue. Ikip ( talk) 15:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC) |
moved from user ikip:
Orlady ( talk) 01:07, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for resolving the situation at File_talk:H1N1_map.svg. I'd issue you a cookie or a barnstar, except I've never looked into how to do that, so I don't know how. 76.66.202.139 ( talk) 04:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Per your recent edit [6], there is no need to perform this change, as {{ Web-RFC}} redirects (and never did anything else) to {{ rfcurl}}. OrangeDog ( talk • edits) 20:28, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
{{
ARS|Authbind|List of warez groups|Mibbit|The Game (dice game)|uCoz}}
Congratulations! Notice the little rescue floats at the top of this page now? Ikip ( talk) 00:58, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
You never had a true clue-bat did you? Certainly not one of the flying mammal kind. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
For the blatantly false accusation that I was "getting revenge" on you for AFD stalking you. Do you really, really think I have some sort of bent against you? I don't do revenge at all, and can't believe that you would make such an accusation, especially behind my back on IRC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
The Socratic Barnstar | ||
For successful launching what appeared to be a snowball argument that saved the {{ R from other capitalisation}} template, I hereby award you this barnstar. Your arguments were both impressive and persuasive. Well done! ThaddeusB ( talk) 15:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC) |
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
For your hard work on the IRC articles that I nominated for deletion, Ten Pound Hammer, his otters, and his clue-bat offer you the Editor's Barnstar. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:46, 25 May 2009 (UTC) |
My comment here. YTCracker's albums clearly lack coverage in reliable secondary sources. Even if it were a pointy nomination, it's still legitemate, and the reason we have a deletion discussion is so POINTy noms don't get a free pass. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 15:02, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Eggdrop, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Theserialcomma ( talk) 04:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Great job! -- BarkerJr ( talk) 03:36, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I regret that I must inform you that your request for the rollback permission has been denied. You can discover why by checking the archives at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Denied/January 2009#Tothwolf. SoxBot X ( talk) 04:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
I have 1 granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 14:09, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
Can you provide a test case for the problem you were trying to fix here? Navbox templates shouldn't need blank lines (or comments) to fix formatting errors. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for letting me know. It wasn't really important; I just needed to take out some trivial/biased info (which I easily redid). :) SKS2K6 ( talk) 21:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for editing. Ribeka&Presario —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ribeka&Presario ( talk • contribs) 17:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I think I've seen your name pop up in AfD's and/or COI discussions. If you have a second can you please give me a hand with an active incident involving multiple Gliese IT SPAs? -- samj in out 15:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
My nomination of the article for AfD first of all did not do anything to disrupt Wikipedia, nor was it an attempt to disrupt Wikipedia, nor was it an attempt to prove a point. There was sound rationale for my nomination, as plenty of other editors noted - specifically see JohnCD's reference to precedent. Yes, I have had a negative opinion of Wikipedia, but I blanked my thoughts on that because my opinion , while not completely changed, is changing, and I have continued to make constructive edits, what's more I have demonstrated collaborate spirit even in dissent (see the log for Poe Elementary School, Houston as well as my interaction with Whisper to Me) and have cheerfully accepted and learned from others' comments (see my response to Post Oak on the Nottingham Forest Talk page). Your comment referring me to WP:POINT was not only not relevent, it was uncalled-for, and dredging up an old deleted comment of mine from my own User Page is a biased attempt to discredit me and smacks of wikistalking. I respectfully but firmly request that you edit your comments to make them more neutral. Mmyers1976 ( talk) 15:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, because of the incivility issues, I have opened a Civility Complaint at WP:WQA, thanks. Mmyers1976 ( talk) 17:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nottingham Forest, Houston. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Beeblebrox ( talk) 17:54, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I added the SPA template to his statement because it is a single purpose account. Look at the user contribution as you did mine. If you like to link to edits of mine you want backed up fill free. 16x9 ( talk) 20:36, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Which article and reference are you referring too? 16x9 ( talk) 02:11, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Source what material? I have found no reliable sources. How did I treat Meskalyto any in way inappropriately as I have NEVER spoken to him. 16x9 ( talk) 18:31, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acrophobia (game). Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MLauba ( talk) 23:20, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
It's ok, no harm done. Acebulf ( talk) 23:26, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
MLauba ( talk) 23:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
MLauba ( talk) 23:38, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
My mistake. A tool I used brought up that page since it falls in Category:Online games, and I tagged it too quickly. MrKIA11 ( talk) 15:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
Killiondude ( talk) 06:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Replied on my talk page. – AB C D ✉ 07:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
(break)
I assume that this is a follow up to the
discussion on
Black Falcon's talk page.
1. I've not heard from MZMcBride myself yet. The courteous thing to do would be to let him deal with his ARB situation before opening another can of worms. (The fact that people are using IRC for discussing this specific issue is both ironic and troubling due to the lack of transparency.)
2. The only person who is pushing for these to be "upmerged" is you. Are you then planning to go after
Category:Wikipedians who use XChat too? If it comes down to it, there will be a DRV and although you seem to have already concluded it would go in your favor, I'd suggest you step back and take another view of this situation because you aren't looking at the full picture. Note that if it does take a DRV to deal with this, it will make it crystal clear that you are indeed violating
WP:POINT.
3. Clearly you are not familiar with the differences in IRC clients or you would not have continued this line of discussion once things were made clear on
Black Falcon's talk page. Wikipedia has no precedents and I can see no reason for a precedent from the list you linked to. In fact, I see no IRC client software in that list at all. (Note that Spamcop isn't even software, they provide a
DNSBL service.)
Rehash: The
Category:Wikipedians who use irssi,
Category:Wikipedians who use mIRC (and
Category:Wikipedians who use IRC) categories were depopulated and not in use when you originally proposed that they be upmerged/deleted. (Note that right now both categories are smaller than they were due to Userpages already being upmerged into
Category:Wikipedians who use IRC.) I've since fixed the userbox templates and added documentation on how to use the categories on the category pages themselves. At the time you proposed they be merged/deleted they were indeed underused and not very helpful. This is no longer the case.
This is getting to the point of
WP:STICK and it's using up the free time I normally devote to working on articles...
--
Tothwolf (
talk)
13:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
The close was correct and will not be overturned (by me, at least). Though, you're free to try Deletion review. Having individual categories for each IRC client makes no sense, a view that the community agrees with as demonstrated by the debate in December. Either move on or file a deletion review. Threats of Arbitration or any similar silliness will not be tolerated. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 01:34, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: your threats [3] [4], I've done nothing wrong. If you feel you need to bring something to AN/I or Arbcom, I certainly can't stop you. I'll note that Arbcom is supposed to be the last step of dispute resolution so I (and I imagine others as well) would find filing any sort of Arbcom complaint highly inappropriate. VegaDark ( talk) 02:47, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
I saw this and thought I would give my opinion. I think you should either go to DRV with this one or drop it. DRV is the process designed to review CFD closures and none of the alternatives you have suggested seem appropriate. Just a friendly note, — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 11:17, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your help with the Prosystem. Jack of All Trades ~Wolf~ ( talk) 23:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by MSGJ ( talk • contribs) 10:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
{{Wikipedia books|Love}}
Hey, this is my favorite new box! Don't forget to add these new templates to
Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia-Books#Templates :-)
RichardF (
talk)
01:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
I answered on my talk page. Thanks for your initial notice on that issue! Yarcanox ( talk) 11:43, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
OK, you're right. I found another way to prevent for extra lines. thx for that link. mabdul 17:06, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
It is likely we are going to do a test run for 2 weeks with the following parameters. (to gather stats and an overall feel of wether this wouls work in general)
Sites: Youtube
Actions: Warn, tag
User Group: Non-Autoconfirmed (New and anonymous users)
We will be removing youtube from the XLinkbot revert list for the duration of the test. If I recall your main quam with a filter was it applying to regulers users, I hope this addresses your concerns. Cheers «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 14:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
I have blocked the IP that removed the material for a longer period, next time they will get a much longer block. As it is only this one IP this time I am reluctant to semi protect it until and unless that situation changes. I will watch it also and let me know if other IPs start the same pattern of vandalism. Mfield ( Oi!) 16:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
You stated at multiple points that ithildin would be still commonly in use. I got interested in that ircd and googled a bit for it and wasn't able to find any other page about it than ithildin.org itself, which seems down. I searched a bit more and came across one server name of darkmyst.org which contained "ithildin", connected and noticed it runs an ithildin server. So this is at least one place where it is still used, but still I think that the net doesn't have any valuable information about this ircd, especially as there is virtually no other site talking about it and the main page down, makes it hard to list it on wikipedia as there are no real sources. I am just attempting to talk to those darkmyst people to find a bit more of the whereabouts of this ircd (Update while writing this text: at least there still seem to be some developers around. I'll ask them if the page will ever be back online). Yarcanox ( talk) 19:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
This may help you:
Finding sources which mention the topic of this article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{ Findsources3}}:
Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:
If the page you edited is deleted, you also
have many options available. Good luck!
Ikip (
talk)
15:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Tothwolf. You have been invited to join the Article Rescue Squadron, a collaborative effort to rescue articles from deletion if they can be improved through regular editing. For more information, please visit the project page, where you can >> join << and help rescue articles tagged for deletion and rescue. Ikip ( talk) 15:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC) |
moved from user ikip:
Orlady ( talk) 01:07, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for resolving the situation at File_talk:H1N1_map.svg. I'd issue you a cookie or a barnstar, except I've never looked into how to do that, so I don't know how. 76.66.202.139 ( talk) 04:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Per your recent edit [6], there is no need to perform this change, as {{ Web-RFC}} redirects (and never did anything else) to {{ rfcurl}}. OrangeDog ( talk • edits) 20:28, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
{{
ARS|Authbind|List of warez groups|Mibbit|The Game (dice game)|uCoz}}
Congratulations! Notice the little rescue floats at the top of this page now? Ikip ( talk) 00:58, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
You never had a true clue-bat did you? Certainly not one of the flying mammal kind. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
For the blatantly false accusation that I was "getting revenge" on you for AFD stalking you. Do you really, really think I have some sort of bent against you? I don't do revenge at all, and can't believe that you would make such an accusation, especially behind my back on IRC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
The Socratic Barnstar | ||
For successful launching what appeared to be a snowball argument that saved the {{ R from other capitalisation}} template, I hereby award you this barnstar. Your arguments were both impressive and persuasive. Well done! ThaddeusB ( talk) 15:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC) |
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
For your hard work on the IRC articles that I nominated for deletion, Ten Pound Hammer, his otters, and his clue-bat offer you the Editor's Barnstar. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:46, 25 May 2009 (UTC) |
My comment here. YTCracker's albums clearly lack coverage in reliable secondary sources. Even if it were a pointy nomination, it's still legitemate, and the reason we have a deletion discussion is so POINTy noms don't get a free pass. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/ complex 15:02, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Eggdrop, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Theserialcomma ( talk) 04:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)