![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
Howdy. In an AE request, one's only allowed to post in one's own Statement or Comment subsection :) GoodDay ( talk) 15:36, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Howdy. I know it can be a frustrating situation, but may I recommend that you 'not' edit the Abrams' page, while you're blocked from the Republican Party's page. Indeed, it would be best to come to an agreement at both those articles' talkpages. Don't forget, you've an AE report hanging over your head, too. GoodDay ( talk) 14:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
The AE result, wasn't what I hoped for. Hope to meet you again, in other areas of the 'pedia. GoodDay ( talk) 18:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey. If I may offer some advice: wait for at least six months before another appeal, and of course don’t commit any infractions, ask an admin if you are unsure if an action you plan would be an infraction. In your eventual appeal, don’t criticise any other editors. Acknowledge what wrong actions that led to your sanction, and commit to not repeating it, possibly by imposing a lesser self-sanction. Don’t need to talk about your history of doing good things, but you can commit to doing more future good things in the topic area. Be succinct, not verbose. While you’re most likely hurting, remember that indefinite is not infinite. starship .paint ( exalt) 13:14, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of states and territories of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unorganized territory.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Are you interested in participating in the discussion of the article? Mureungdowon ( talk) 03:02, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, when reverting, it would be helpful for you to address another editor's edit summary directly. Note that I cited
WP:SYNTH as the reason for removal. Sifting through individual reviews to identify general trends clearly combines material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any source
as per WP:SYNTH. I will revert again per my reasoning and ask you to start a talk page discussion if you still disagree on policy grounds. Thanks for considering.
Throast {{ping}} me! (
talk |
contribs)
14:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content, which is you in this case. I'd agree to remove the "derivative" bit from the lead as long as the WP:SYNTH is removed as well. Note that I did not remove the first part of the sentence that states that the film received positive critical reviews. Throast {{ping}} me! ( talk | contribs) 15:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Appreciate this edit of yours, but just a quick point that it wasn't TropicAces that changed that, as you can see here. Thanks. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 17:13, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
I wonder, my edit on Raiders of the Lost Ark saying it is an important film has been removed, but you've just reinstated the same puffery about Star Wars. Why? ~~ Nowy Prywaciarz ( talk) 01:59, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
One IP changed the Wikipedia:Good topics/Music to add an unexistent topic on Almost There (album). It is a certain pass if it happens, given it's an FA and two GAs (see box below), would you do it yourself or at least give me permission to nominate?
igordebraga ≠ 05:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
NFL Europe you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Lee Vilenski --
Lee Vilenski (
talk)
13:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
The article
NFL Europe you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:NFL Europe for comments about the article, and
Talk:NFL Europe/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Lee Vilenski --
Lee Vilenski (
talk)
16:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Toa Nidhiki05. I'm just posting to let you know that List of National Football League rushing champions – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for February 13. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 22:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
The Beautiful Letdown you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Hog Farm --
Hog Farm (
talk)
20:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
The article
The Beautiful Letdown you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:The Beautiful Letdown and
Talk:The Beautiful Letdown/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Hog Farm --
Hog Farm (
talk)
00:41, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
The article
The Beautiful Letdown you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:The Beautiful Letdown for comments about the article, and
Talk:The Beautiful Letdown/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Hog Farm --
Hog Farm (
talk)
14:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
On 8 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Beautiful Letdown, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that songs in The Beautiful Letdown are "chunky", "gentle", and "nois[y]"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Beautiful Letdown. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, The Beautiful Letdown), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Aoidh ( talk) 00:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Wanted to let you know that your participation in this RSN discussion about the reliability of Jacobin (magazine) (and, this article in particular) is likely a violation of your topic-ban from "from post-1992 American politics". Abecedare ( talk) 00:20, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
As someone who's also been targeted off-site, I want to express my solidarity, regardless of the result of your appeal at AE. And also to thank you for the lolz I got reading Attkisson's description of a barnstar as "what amounts to a commendation in the strange underworld of Wikipedia." :0 Generalrelative ( talk) 03:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
I closed your appeal as declined. As Seraphimblade says, not's not forever, but it's also not right now. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 14:20, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mariya Takeuchi - Plastic Love 1985.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho ( talk) 20:16, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi Toa. It looks like you've violated your TBAN a couple times at some musician/song articles. Could you please review and self-revert? Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 13:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
They should never be placed in discography tables or tables of charts. They may occasionally be mentioned in article prose if special circumstances warrant it. "Special circumstances" include notable controversies alleging chart manipulation, or cases where eligibility requirements prevented standard charts from recognizing the sales. This would include, for example, the noted resurgence of Michael Jackson related sales at the time of his death, when many chart rules prevented any of his album sales from being credited towards a chart position. Similarly, some charts representing the home country of the artist or composer or releases with a strong link to the country in question (e.g. Eurovision entries), can be included if no other suitable charts can be located
![]() | |
Nine years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:15, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Did you read MOS:TABLECAPTION or MOS:COLHEAD before you undid my edits? Why do you think that we shouldn't have accessibility features for the blind here? ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 14:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi Toa Nidhiki. As you may have seen, I have scaled back your topic-ban to cover only biographies of living people within the AP2 contentious topic. I framed it as a TBAN from articles about living people, because anything else would be very difficult to enforce. However, I wanted to remind you of the circumstances of your original TBAN and note that evidence of POV-pushing related to content about living people in articles not covered by this sanction won't look good if you want it completely removed eventually. I trust no such thing will occur. If you have questions about the scope of this sanction I am happy to answer them. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 13:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Plastic Love you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ippantekina --
Ippantekina (
talk)
07:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
The article
Plastic Love you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Plastic Love and
Talk:Plastic Love/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ippantekina --
Ippantekina (
talk)
04:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
The article
Plastic Love you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Plastic Love for comments about the article, and
Talk:Plastic Love/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ippantekina --
Ippantekina (
talk)
02:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 |
Howdy. In an AE request, one's only allowed to post in one's own Statement or Comment subsection :) GoodDay ( talk) 15:36, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Howdy. I know it can be a frustrating situation, but may I recommend that you 'not' edit the Abrams' page, while you're blocked from the Republican Party's page. Indeed, it would be best to come to an agreement at both those articles' talkpages. Don't forget, you've an AE report hanging over your head, too. GoodDay ( talk) 14:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
The AE result, wasn't what I hoped for. Hope to meet you again, in other areas of the 'pedia. GoodDay ( talk) 18:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey. If I may offer some advice: wait for at least six months before another appeal, and of course don’t commit any infractions, ask an admin if you are unsure if an action you plan would be an infraction. In your eventual appeal, don’t criticise any other editors. Acknowledge what wrong actions that led to your sanction, and commit to not repeating it, possibly by imposing a lesser self-sanction. Don’t need to talk about your history of doing good things, but you can commit to doing more future good things in the topic area. Be succinct, not verbose. While you’re most likely hurting, remember that indefinite is not infinite. starship .paint ( exalt) 13:14, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of states and territories of the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unorganized territory.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Are you interested in participating in the discussion of the article? Mureungdowon ( talk) 03:02, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, when reverting, it would be helpful for you to address another editor's edit summary directly. Note that I cited
WP:SYNTH as the reason for removal. Sifting through individual reviews to identify general trends clearly combines material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any source
as per WP:SYNTH. I will revert again per my reasoning and ask you to start a talk page discussion if you still disagree on policy grounds. Thanks for considering.
Throast {{ping}} me! (
talk |
contribs)
14:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content, which is you in this case. I'd agree to remove the "derivative" bit from the lead as long as the WP:SYNTH is removed as well. Note that I did not remove the first part of the sentence that states that the film received positive critical reviews. Throast {{ping}} me! ( talk | contribs) 15:06, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Appreciate this edit of yours, but just a quick point that it wasn't TropicAces that changed that, as you can see here. Thanks. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 17:13, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
I wonder, my edit on Raiders of the Lost Ark saying it is an important film has been removed, but you've just reinstated the same puffery about Star Wars. Why? ~~ Nowy Prywaciarz ( talk) 01:59, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
One IP changed the Wikipedia:Good topics/Music to add an unexistent topic on Almost There (album). It is a certain pass if it happens, given it's an FA and two GAs (see box below), would you do it yourself or at least give me permission to nominate?
igordebraga ≠ 05:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
NFL Europe you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Lee Vilenski --
Lee Vilenski (
talk)
13:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
The article
NFL Europe you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:NFL Europe for comments about the article, and
Talk:NFL Europe/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Lee Vilenski --
Lee Vilenski (
talk)
16:22, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, Toa Nidhiki05. I'm just posting to let you know that List of National Football League rushing champions – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for February 13. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 22:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
The Beautiful Letdown you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Hog Farm --
Hog Farm (
talk)
20:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
The article
The Beautiful Letdown you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:The Beautiful Letdown and
Talk:The Beautiful Letdown/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Hog Farm --
Hog Farm (
talk)
00:41, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
The article
The Beautiful Letdown you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:The Beautiful Letdown for comments about the article, and
Talk:The Beautiful Letdown/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Hog Farm --
Hog Farm (
talk)
14:22, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
On 8 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Beautiful Letdown, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that songs in The Beautiful Letdown are "chunky", "gentle", and "nois[y]"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Beautiful Letdown. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, The Beautiful Letdown), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Aoidh ( talk) 00:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Wanted to let you know that your participation in this RSN discussion about the reliability of Jacobin (magazine) (and, this article in particular) is likely a violation of your topic-ban from "from post-1992 American politics". Abecedare ( talk) 00:20, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
As someone who's also been targeted off-site, I want to express my solidarity, regardless of the result of your appeal at AE. And also to thank you for the lolz I got reading Attkisson's description of a barnstar as "what amounts to a commendation in the strange underworld of Wikipedia." :0 Generalrelative ( talk) 03:14, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
I closed your appeal as declined. As Seraphimblade says, not's not forever, but it's also not right now. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 14:20, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mariya Takeuchi - Plastic Love 1985.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho ( talk) 20:16, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi Toa. It looks like you've violated your TBAN a couple times at some musician/song articles. Could you please review and self-revert? Firefangledfeathers ( talk / contribs) 13:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
They should never be placed in discography tables or tables of charts. They may occasionally be mentioned in article prose if special circumstances warrant it. "Special circumstances" include notable controversies alleging chart manipulation, or cases where eligibility requirements prevented standard charts from recognizing the sales. This would include, for example, the noted resurgence of Michael Jackson related sales at the time of his death, when many chart rules prevented any of his album sales from being credited towards a chart position. Similarly, some charts representing the home country of the artist or composer or releases with a strong link to the country in question (e.g. Eurovision entries), can be included if no other suitable charts can be located
![]() | |
Nine years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:15, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Did you read MOS:TABLECAPTION or MOS:COLHEAD before you undid my edits? Why do you think that we shouldn't have accessibility features for the blind here? ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 14:02, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi Toa Nidhiki. As you may have seen, I have scaled back your topic-ban to cover only biographies of living people within the AP2 contentious topic. I framed it as a TBAN from articles about living people, because anything else would be very difficult to enforce. However, I wanted to remind you of the circumstances of your original TBAN and note that evidence of POV-pushing related to content about living people in articles not covered by this sanction won't look good if you want it completely removed eventually. I trust no such thing will occur. If you have questions about the scope of this sanction I am happy to answer them. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 13:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Plastic Love you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ippantekina --
Ippantekina (
talk)
07:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
The article
Plastic Love you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Plastic Love and
Talk:Plastic Love/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ippantekina --
Ippantekina (
talk)
04:20, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
The article
Plastic Love you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Plastic Love for comments about the article, and
Talk:Plastic Love/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is
eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can
nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ippantekina --
Ippantekina (
talk)
02:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)