![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 |
Hello. It seems the blocked user is back again.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/84.0.91.8. Is a range block possible? ( Iaaasi ( talk) 20:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC))
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/84.0.91.88 He's so persevering. I wonder if he will ever stop ( Iaaasi ( talk) 22:15, 19 January 2011 (UTC))
Maybe you could have a look into this. I know Kalsermar is not a new sock puppet in this complex, but he is continuing on this cross-wiki vandalism path. -- Whaledad ( talk) 05:39, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Just FYI: On his Dutch talk page Mr. SwedishSven has announced that he will return to EN-Wiki under a different name. -- Whaledad ( talk) 00:18, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
This user was blocked by you at what appears to be the exact same time that you blocked NickSoroka for obvious multiple sockpuppetry. Lars has only made five edits here in total , the last one being in August last year, and his name does not appear on Nick Soroka extensive list of socks. Am I missing something, or is he suffering collateral damage?-- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 21:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
May this be dispatched? [1] Thanks. — goethean ॐ 15:45, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi! Since you've been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, I wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.
If you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors during the current term, which started in January and goes through early May. If that's something you want to do, please apply!
You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE.
I hope to hear from you soon.-- Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation ( talk) 19:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Quick question — as far as I can remember, I've never before been involved in an SPI, so I'm not sure what you meant by "Unrelated". Does that mean "the rest of this comment is tangential to our discussion", or "the IPs are unrelated to each other", or something else? Nyttend ( talk) 02:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Followup question before I unblock.— Kww( talk) 19:32, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
I'm sure that he's one of the several sock puppeteers who has been menacing the Transformers articles the last year. Would it be wrong of me to start an investigation into him being Wiki Brah next? He might be him if he isn't Editor XXV. Mathewignash ( talk) 19:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
This lad (now well over 70 socks) has, at one time or another, given his full name, date of birth, home town and school. His last two accounts were created only yesterday, so I have left messages on their talk pages saying that if he carries on we shall write to his school, or his parents via the school, to tell them how much time he is wasting and ask them to put a stop to it. I might ask you in a week or two to run another checkuser to see whether that has actually stopped him. Do you know if there is any precedent for doing something like that? It's not as if we were outing him, he has outed himself. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 10:44, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Why was he allowed to continue immediately after his sockpuppet attacks ? Please provide details why would such details be private ? Babasalichai ( talk) 03:58, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
The reason abotu the anti vandalism is because It is hard to determine if it is vandalism or not. I do not want to mess up and get blocked. -- Comppro ( talk) 01:33, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Please read WP:Help desk#sock policy and comment there. An anon questioned the reason you declined a checkuser and was unable post here because this page is semiprotected. — teb728 t c 10:34, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Hey. Got a question for you on that case: the two accounts I listed at the top, EventView871 and ItwasaMistake7 - are they totally unrelated to the others listed? — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 15:53, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
The reason why I wanted my page semi-protected was not really a user request, it was to prevent the IP vandal rubbing his dirty fingerprints in again. Although in this diff (it may have been moved by now) I did say temporary protection. Never mind, it'll do.-- The Master of Mayhem ( talk) 20:27, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Just a heads up, the minimum requirement for Autopatrolled was recently changed to around 50 new articles, per discussion at the VPP. Not that it would have mattered for your recent edit at WP:PERM/A, though. Nakon 07:44, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed your statement at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled#User:BurtAlert and just thought I'll leave a small note that the recommended number of articles has been reduced to 50, not 70. Thanks. Wifione ....... Leave a message 09:49, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. If you don't mind, could you tell me what sockpuppet this account was linked too? — Mike Allen 02:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey Tiptoety. Would you object to having the protections on these articles be extended? I protected the article for 2 weeks earlier for the same reason and I don't think 3 days will be enough considering that he/she came back pretty quickly. Elockid ( Talk) 20:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The sock is now testing the waters as BreakingWT ( talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log). Can you please block user creation on that IP?-- Jeffro77 ( talk) 02:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
There's a backlog of reports on this page that have not been addressed for 40 minutes now. Jasper Deng ( talk) 02:41, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Could you maybe put its IP 173.178.93.250 on ice for a little while also? Basically a troll, and the one who started the nonsense. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 03:37, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Awesome, breathtaking photo. :) ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 03:39, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
I was merely signing comments per WP:SIG. Since it was a specifically unprotected talk page established by the editor, I thought it was better if he would be able to review it himself. Obviously, the other editor whose changes I reverted (and who subsequently reverted my own change) did not agree, and I left it at that. -- RoyalFool ( talk) 22:08, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey. Just a quick heads-up: on that case, you listed Uceify3487 - but that's not an account. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 23:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
...but having spent some time counselling what I thought was a newbie, I would be interested to know the background to this, if there is anything you can tell me, by email if necessary. JohnCD ( talk) 23:01, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
There is so much material here, and so much misunderstanding and misrepresentation that it would be unfair to expect me to stick to the 1000 word limit, to enable me to give an adequate rebuttal; I would ask for a relaxation of the norms here, to allow the issues to be properly aired. If you propose to edit my input, I'd be glad if you would discuss it first. Thanks. Rodhull andemu 01:18, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi there Tiptoety, I am interested in clerking, and I would like to know a little bit more about it. (I am not yet interested in becoming one, I just would like to learn a little bit about the procedures) PaoloNapolitano ( talk) 16:19, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Tiptoety, Thanks for giving me the rollback right. Thanks. -- Ankit Maity 08:31, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
I just indef'd Tipteoty ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:02, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
*** in fact *** ( contact ) 07:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Just left you a note on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hielmann. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 15:16, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I see you blocked LP and recorded it at
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lapsed Pacifist but he was actually in violation of
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lapsed Pacifist 2 (Yeh they have two arbcom cases!) though on a related point I think he may have violated the first case
here!
GainLine
♠
♥
17:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello Tiptoety, a user uncovered defamatory remarks targeted towards you on images he was viewing on wapedia; please see here. I'm at a loss as to how to remove them, and those remarks aren't present on their corresponding Commons files. I thought I'd let you know since you're being targeted. Regards, Airplaneman ✈ 19:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Knock knock.... Sy n 13:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Please see User talk:AbhisheksinghWIKI#March 2011. This user has told me via email that they have been trying to appeal this block. I do not understand why talk page access was disabled in this case because it usually makes note of this in the block summary. Perhaps you could comment on the matter. Many thanks — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 12:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Sent you one. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 23:27, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello Tiptoety,
This message is to inform you that a motion to the second chance type of unblock of Iaaasi has been filled at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Iaaas in either order for the decision to be approved, or to be repealed by community consensus. Inasmuch as you would like to let the community know what your opinion is about the case, your participation in the discussion is welcome. Regards.-- Nmate ( talk) 16:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for approving my File mover permission request. Also, cool owl picture on your user page.-- Rockfang ( talk) 07:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
NW ( Talk) 04:52, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
You blocked 173.178.93.250 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) on March 4 for abusing multiple accounts. (S)he has returned for more trolling. Can you block this editor? Thanks, Goodvac ( talk) 22:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
what are we doing with this now? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 17:49, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Regarding the block of PSOILFHJFHFDF ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log): Was it the apparent pattern of harassment carrying over from another Wiki that was the abusive edit leading to his block, or was there something else in play? I didn't see any warnings or other socks (other than one not-logged-in edit), but I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something.
Feel free to reply via email if you feel it's inappropriate to discuss the situation on a talk page. — C.Fred ( talk) 19:37, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
The pending changes (PC) was applied on March 18, 2011 on this article. As you probably saw on the protection screen, the message says "...The result of a poll was in favor of the temporary continuation of PC...". Since the article did not have any PC applied during the trial, it is against community consensus to add it to the article in the first place. Therefore, I removed it as it did not reflect the community's decision on the usage of pending changes on pages not protected during the trial. OhanaUnited Talk page 23:55, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Any reason why 90.177.208.162 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) is not blocked? Here's the IP starting an edit war which is then continued minutes later by Giornorosso sockpuppet Lootsucker, just as an example. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 11:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
← I'm back. Is there still something you need to discuss? Tiptoety talk 04:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello, User:PSOILFHJFHFDF has over 214 confirmed socks and growing in Wikipedia Persian, As those users could be easily transferred to wikipedia English I am wondering if you there is a way to perhaps add them to his list of users or refer to them in the category?! you can find list of his confirmed socks in Wikipedia Persian here. thanks Rmzadeh ► 03:31, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
I didn't realize you indef'd him some months ago (I'm not following these dramaz closely). I saw that Special:Contributions/Truth will prevail 200 pushes the same exact themes that Lanternix did. [3] "descendants of ancient Egyptians", "In an attempt to justify the massacre" etc. See [4] Tijfo098 ( talk) 19:43, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Hey. Sorry, I just need a little clarification - is Wayne Paine part of the confirmed, or is it unrelated? — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 04:38, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello Tiptoety, we haven't been in contact for a long time :) I have question: may I use pictures from Tanjug in Wikipedia (free use)? Alex discussion 09:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 |
Hello. It seems the blocked user is back again.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/84.0.91.8. Is a range block possible? ( Iaaasi ( talk) 20:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC))
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/84.0.91.88 He's so persevering. I wonder if he will ever stop ( Iaaasi ( talk) 22:15, 19 January 2011 (UTC))
Maybe you could have a look into this. I know Kalsermar is not a new sock puppet in this complex, but he is continuing on this cross-wiki vandalism path. -- Whaledad ( talk) 05:39, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
Just FYI: On his Dutch talk page Mr. SwedishSven has announced that he will return to EN-Wiki under a different name. -- Whaledad ( talk) 00:18, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
This user was blocked by you at what appears to be the exact same time that you blocked NickSoroka for obvious multiple sockpuppetry. Lars has only made five edits here in total , the last one being in August last year, and his name does not appear on Nick Soroka extensive list of socks. Am I missing something, or is he suffering collateral damage?-- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 21:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
May this be dispatched? [1] Thanks. — goethean ॐ 15:45, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi! Since you've been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, I wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.
If you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors during the current term, which started in January and goes through early May. If that's something you want to do, please apply!
You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE.
I hope to hear from you soon.-- Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation ( talk) 19:29, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Quick question — as far as I can remember, I've never before been involved in an SPI, so I'm not sure what you meant by "Unrelated". Does that mean "the rest of this comment is tangential to our discussion", or "the IPs are unrelated to each other", or something else? Nyttend ( talk) 02:35, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Followup question before I unblock.— Kww( talk) 19:32, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
I'm sure that he's one of the several sock puppeteers who has been menacing the Transformers articles the last year. Would it be wrong of me to start an investigation into him being Wiki Brah next? He might be him if he isn't Editor XXV. Mathewignash ( talk) 19:44, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
This lad (now well over 70 socks) has, at one time or another, given his full name, date of birth, home town and school. His last two accounts were created only yesterday, so I have left messages on their talk pages saying that if he carries on we shall write to his school, or his parents via the school, to tell them how much time he is wasting and ask them to put a stop to it. I might ask you in a week or two to run another checkuser to see whether that has actually stopped him. Do you know if there is any precedent for doing something like that? It's not as if we were outing him, he has outed himself. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 10:44, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Why was he allowed to continue immediately after his sockpuppet attacks ? Please provide details why would such details be private ? Babasalichai ( talk) 03:58, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
The reason abotu the anti vandalism is because It is hard to determine if it is vandalism or not. I do not want to mess up and get blocked. -- Comppro ( talk) 01:33, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Please read WP:Help desk#sock policy and comment there. An anon questioned the reason you declined a checkuser and was unable post here because this page is semiprotected. — teb728 t c 10:34, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Hey. Got a question for you on that case: the two accounts I listed at the top, EventView871 and ItwasaMistake7 - are they totally unrelated to the others listed? — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 15:53, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
The reason why I wanted my page semi-protected was not really a user request, it was to prevent the IP vandal rubbing his dirty fingerprints in again. Although in this diff (it may have been moved by now) I did say temporary protection. Never mind, it'll do.-- The Master of Mayhem ( talk) 20:27, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Just a heads up, the minimum requirement for Autopatrolled was recently changed to around 50 new articles, per discussion at the VPP. Not that it would have mattered for your recent edit at WP:PERM/A, though. Nakon 07:44, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed your statement at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled#User:BurtAlert and just thought I'll leave a small note that the recommended number of articles has been reduced to 50, not 70. Thanks. Wifione ....... Leave a message 09:49, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi. If you don't mind, could you tell me what sockpuppet this account was linked too? — Mike Allen 02:34, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey Tiptoety. Would you object to having the protections on these articles be extended? I protected the article for 2 weeks earlier for the same reason and I don't think 3 days will be enough considering that he/she came back pretty quickly. Elockid ( Talk) 20:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The sock is now testing the waters as BreakingWT ( talk · contribs · global contribs · logs · block log). Can you please block user creation on that IP?-- Jeffro77 ( talk) 02:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
There's a backlog of reports on this page that have not been addressed for 40 minutes now. Jasper Deng ( talk) 02:41, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Could you maybe put its IP 173.178.93.250 on ice for a little while also? Basically a troll, and the one who started the nonsense. ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 03:37, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Awesome, breathtaking photo. :) ← Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 03:39, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
I was merely signing comments per WP:SIG. Since it was a specifically unprotected talk page established by the editor, I thought it was better if he would be able to review it himself. Obviously, the other editor whose changes I reverted (and who subsequently reverted my own change) did not agree, and I left it at that. -- RoyalFool ( talk) 22:08, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey. Just a quick heads-up: on that case, you listed Uceify3487 - but that's not an account. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 23:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
...but having spent some time counselling what I thought was a newbie, I would be interested to know the background to this, if there is anything you can tell me, by email if necessary. JohnCD ( talk) 23:01, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
There is so much material here, and so much misunderstanding and misrepresentation that it would be unfair to expect me to stick to the 1000 word limit, to enable me to give an adequate rebuttal; I would ask for a relaxation of the norms here, to allow the issues to be properly aired. If you propose to edit my input, I'd be glad if you would discuss it first. Thanks. Rodhull andemu 01:18, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi there Tiptoety, I am interested in clerking, and I would like to know a little bit more about it. (I am not yet interested in becoming one, I just would like to learn a little bit about the procedures) PaoloNapolitano ( talk) 16:19, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Tiptoety, Thanks for giving me the rollback right. Thanks. -- Ankit Maity 08:31, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
I just indef'd Tipteoty ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:02, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
*** in fact *** ( contact ) 07:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Just left you a note on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hielmann. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 15:16, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I see you blocked LP and recorded it at
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lapsed Pacifist but he was actually in violation of
Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Lapsed Pacifist 2 (Yeh they have two arbcom cases!) though on a related point I think he may have violated the first case
here!
GainLine
♠
♥
17:55, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello Tiptoety, a user uncovered defamatory remarks targeted towards you on images he was viewing on wapedia; please see here. I'm at a loss as to how to remove them, and those remarks aren't present on their corresponding Commons files. I thought I'd let you know since you're being targeted. Regards, Airplaneman ✈ 19:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Knock knock.... Sy n 13:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Please see User talk:AbhisheksinghWIKI#March 2011. This user has told me via email that they have been trying to appeal this block. I do not understand why talk page access was disabled in this case because it usually makes note of this in the block summary. Perhaps you could comment on the matter. Many thanks — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 12:37, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Sent you one. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 23:27, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello Tiptoety,
This message is to inform you that a motion to the second chance type of unblock of Iaaasi has been filled at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Iaaas in either order for the decision to be approved, or to be repealed by community consensus. Inasmuch as you would like to let the community know what your opinion is about the case, your participation in the discussion is welcome. Regards.-- Nmate ( talk) 16:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for approving my File mover permission request. Also, cool owl picture on your user page.-- Rockfang ( talk) 07:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
NW ( Talk) 04:52, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
You blocked 173.178.93.250 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) on March 4 for abusing multiple accounts. (S)he has returned for more trolling. Can you block this editor? Thanks, Goodvac ( talk) 22:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
what are we doing with this now? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 17:49, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Regarding the block of PSOILFHJFHFDF ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log): Was it the apparent pattern of harassment carrying over from another Wiki that was the abusive edit leading to his block, or was there something else in play? I didn't see any warnings or other socks (other than one not-logged-in edit), but I wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something.
Feel free to reply via email if you feel it's inappropriate to discuss the situation on a talk page. — C.Fred ( talk) 19:37, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
The pending changes (PC) was applied on March 18, 2011 on this article. As you probably saw on the protection screen, the message says "...The result of a poll was in favor of the temporary continuation of PC...". Since the article did not have any PC applied during the trial, it is against community consensus to add it to the article in the first place. Therefore, I removed it as it did not reflect the community's decision on the usage of pending changes on pages not protected during the trial. OhanaUnited Talk page 23:55, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Any reason why 90.177.208.162 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) is not blocked? Here's the IP starting an edit war which is then continued minutes later by Giornorosso sockpuppet Lootsucker, just as an example. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 11:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
← I'm back. Is there still something you need to discuss? Tiptoety talk 04:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello, User:PSOILFHJFHFDF has over 214 confirmed socks and growing in Wikipedia Persian, As those users could be easily transferred to wikipedia English I am wondering if you there is a way to perhaps add them to his list of users or refer to them in the category?! you can find list of his confirmed socks in Wikipedia Persian here. thanks Rmzadeh ► 03:31, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
I didn't realize you indef'd him some months ago (I'm not following these dramaz closely). I saw that Special:Contributions/Truth will prevail 200 pushes the same exact themes that Lanternix did. [3] "descendants of ancient Egyptians", "In an attempt to justify the massacre" etc. See [4] Tijfo098 ( talk) 19:43, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Hey. Sorry, I just need a little clarification - is Wayne Paine part of the confirmed, or is it unrelated? — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 04:38, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Hello Tiptoety, we haven't been in contact for a long time :) I have question: may I use pictures from Tanjug in Wikipedia (free use)? Alex discussion 09:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)