![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
On 12 September 2011, you deleted Ice core brittle zone but left at least 7 pages linked to it. I do not know what was in the original. How should I proceed? It seems that the redlinks should have been removed with the article so that people monitoring those articles would know what happened.
I am aware of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Astronomy/User:Marshallsumter_Incident_Article_Fix-up_Coordination_Page. Should I post something there, or is that just for administrators?
BTW, your deletion of Greenland ice cores (same creator) is currently being discussed at WUWT. Perhaps you could explain the problems before they jump to the wrong conclusions. Q Science ( talk) 05:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
...I just got eaten by the rest of my life. I have not forgotten the bot idea, I promise! KillerChihuahua ?!? 18:32, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Am I allowed to comment on the discussion at the AE enforcement request re collect? I am afraid that PS has made an error in the sequence of events. The Last Angry Man ( talk) 21:08, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Hey. I like the new block functionality you added into the script. One thing I noticed, though, is that if a userpage doesn't exist and the script has to create it for a tag, the page ends up on my watchlist. Can you turn that off or make it an option or something? — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 03:45, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
I tried to copy over Commons:Template:Valid SVG to enwiki {{Valid SVG}} for a user - I thought it'd be straight-forward, but it wasn't, due to the commons /en language thingies. So I made a right mess of it. The URL thingy doesn't work. Can you possibly take a look? Ta. Chzz ► 21:21, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Some time ago you were kind enough to lay down a rangeblock for me; 166.216.130.0/24 was blocked 1 year in March. In all of this time I still have not become any more proficient in calculating or performing rangeblocks, so I am setting myself at your feet once again. The same type of disruptive WP:BLPCAT/ WP:EGRS edits are now being made within the 166.137 range. Examples include 166.137.139.73, 166.137.139.205, 166.137.139.134, 166.137.139.95, and 166.137.139.73. I've been playing whack-a-mole, but it's become tiresome. Is a rangeblock feasible in this case? -- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 15:42, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
It's harder to figure out the smallest range that includes both addresses just from looking at them, but you can get a good sense of whether a rangeblock is feasible from just looking at the IP addresses and deciding if all of them are in the same /16. T. Canens ( talk) 15:56, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Can you stop by the requests page please? My request has sat there for a little over a week -- Guerillero | My Talk 04:41, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Regarding this your post, could you please explain me what is the mechanism that would allow me to request the last stable version (the version before the violation has occurred) to be restored? Note, if this mechanism implies the usage of the editprotect template, then the last illegitimate additions acquire a status of legitimately added content, therefore, this admins' decision is de facto an endorsement of the illegitimately added content.-- Paul Siebert ( talk) 17:27, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Bleeckie Streetie was originally uploaded and then deleted and then re-uploaded under Bleeckie once the sources were correctly cited. The page was visible and then deemed "promotional". It's not promotional but vey valid and in fact correctly cited. How can this be appealed with additional sources added?
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.110.125.12 ( talk) 03:20, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
T Cannes, I just read the note on my talk. I just want to mention that I have been open to change, been always contributing with quality academic material, and western press, and had been attempting to even extend a hand of friendship to editors on the other side, am not sure why the ban on me comes at this moment of time. Please let me know what the concerns are and if I may be given a process in which I can defend myself, or the accussations made against me on which apprently the ban has been made. Dilip rajeev ( talk) 11:23, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I am just notifying you that there is a discussion over at the Blocks/Protections noticeboard at Commons regarding User:Jo0doe. As his blocking admin here on en-wiki, I figured that it would be proper to let you know. Regards, Lothar von Richthofen ( talk) 18:58, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello Tim, I have sent you an email regarding a sockpuppet. Thanks, nableezy - 16:42, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
I saw your comment and noticed that it came just moments after mine. I hope that you were not referring to me. I made one edit, a new edit that was never done bebore at Banias and one revert nearly 35 hours later! I sincerely hope you weren't referring to me.-- Jiujitsuguy ( talk) 18:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Good call. I had a feeling that it would be attacked after NBA negotiations went into a tailspin yesterday. hbdragon88 ( talk) 06:25, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
I immediately self reverted within seconds once I was provided with the link above. Look, if your looking to ban me just let me know so I won't waste any more time with this. I self-reverted almost immediately once I was provided with the link. Forgive me if I'm not completely up to speed with every nuance of IPCOLLAB. In addition I haven't edited in I-P for over eight months. And again, the minute I was provided with the link and read it, I self reverted. What more do you want for Christ sake?!-- Jiujitsuguy ( talk) 22:14, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
The discussion you closed before is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive224#Doncram NHRP stubs, in case you don't have every post you've ever made memorized. :-)-- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:53, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Personally, I still have reservations about the blanket blocks, particularly of HappyInGeneral, as per some of my comments at the AE thread. I was wondering what, if any, action you might deem appropriate for me to possibly have the ban on that editor lifted. Thank you for your attention. John Carter ( talk) 21:28, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks--I was checking into the odd edit summary at User:Kross to find that this editor already got hisself blocked. "LCV is back"--if this editor weren't so, well, you know, I'd be thinking of socking. Drmies ( talk) 03:57, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Please see here: [1]. The disruptive user whose IP was blocked has switched IPs. Faustian ( talk) 15:19, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
SharedIPArchiveBot ( talk · contribs) has edited about 5000 IP talk pages; I need to know which of those were recently blocked.
Is it possible to list contribs from SharedIPArchiveBot ( talk · contribs) in order of the block-date of the IP user page that it edited? Chzz ► 06:12, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
I am confused by your decision as closing admin. I have no problem with the ones you said to keep (except for Doug Anderson who wasn't put up for AfD). There was clearly no consensus that I could see to keep any of the other fighters. In fact, I'd say there was clear consensus to delete them. Most of them received zero support, except for a couple of IPs who gave no good reasons why everyone should be kept. If you want to say I put up too many names, I wouldn't argue that. However, a lot of editors spent the time to go through those articles and now you want them to do it again. I'd appreciate it if you could tell me how you could look at those statements and claim there was no consensus on most of those fighters. Papaursa ( talk) 00:25, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Please unrestrict my IP addresss 76.118.227.161 due to the fact that my delition of material on the Bule Army (Poland) page was confirmed by administrator Volunteer Marek yet when the other user did not like the outcome they reverted the page, and went to you to get me restricted. This is highly bias and unethical. So, again I ask that my IP address be un-restricted! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.162.211.76 ( talk) 16:22, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
See my comment here [3]. Volunteer Marek 16:22, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
I have filed a request to approve the NPP automated program. Thanks -- Mohamed Aden Ighe ( talk) 22:08, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Care to add yourself as a party commenting as one of the AE patrollers? -- Peter cohen ( talk) 14:26, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi - could you email me a copy please. Off2riorob ( talk) 00:21, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Timotheus,
I noticed you've permanently banned Epeefleche. Given that he's a longstanding editor with almost 90,000 edits, I am concerned. Can you help me understand why you've taken this action? Thanks. Jayjg (talk) 03:52, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Please give Fut.Perf. ☼ a shout. Thanks. [4] — A. Kupicki ( talk) 14:07, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
On 12 September 2011, you deleted Ice core brittle zone but left at least 7 pages linked to it. I do not know what was in the original. How should I proceed? It seems that the redlinks should have been removed with the article so that people monitoring those articles would know what happened.
I am aware of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Astronomy/User:Marshallsumter_Incident_Article_Fix-up_Coordination_Page. Should I post something there, or is that just for administrators?
BTW, your deletion of Greenland ice cores (same creator) is currently being discussed at WUWT. Perhaps you could explain the problems before they jump to the wrong conclusions. Q Science ( talk) 05:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
...I just got eaten by the rest of my life. I have not forgotten the bot idea, I promise! KillerChihuahua ?!? 18:32, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Am I allowed to comment on the discussion at the AE enforcement request re collect? I am afraid that PS has made an error in the sequence of events. The Last Angry Man ( talk) 21:08, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Hey. I like the new block functionality you added into the script. One thing I noticed, though, is that if a userpage doesn't exist and the script has to create it for a tag, the page ends up on my watchlist. Can you turn that off or make it an option or something? — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 03:45, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
I tried to copy over Commons:Template:Valid SVG to enwiki {{Valid SVG}} for a user - I thought it'd be straight-forward, but it wasn't, due to the commons /en language thingies. So I made a right mess of it. The URL thingy doesn't work. Can you possibly take a look? Ta. Chzz ► 21:21, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Some time ago you were kind enough to lay down a rangeblock for me; 166.216.130.0/24 was blocked 1 year in March. In all of this time I still have not become any more proficient in calculating or performing rangeblocks, so I am setting myself at your feet once again. The same type of disruptive WP:BLPCAT/ WP:EGRS edits are now being made within the 166.137 range. Examples include 166.137.139.73, 166.137.139.205, 166.137.139.134, 166.137.139.95, and 166.137.139.73. I've been playing whack-a-mole, but it's become tiresome. Is a rangeblock feasible in this case? -- Jezebel'sPonyo bons mots 15:42, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
It's harder to figure out the smallest range that includes both addresses just from looking at them, but you can get a good sense of whether a rangeblock is feasible from just looking at the IP addresses and deciding if all of them are in the same /16. T. Canens ( talk) 15:56, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Can you stop by the requests page please? My request has sat there for a little over a week -- Guerillero | My Talk 04:41, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Regarding this your post, could you please explain me what is the mechanism that would allow me to request the last stable version (the version before the violation has occurred) to be restored? Note, if this mechanism implies the usage of the editprotect template, then the last illegitimate additions acquire a status of legitimately added content, therefore, this admins' decision is de facto an endorsement of the illegitimately added content.-- Paul Siebert ( talk) 17:27, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Bleeckie Streetie was originally uploaded and then deleted and then re-uploaded under Bleeckie once the sources were correctly cited. The page was visible and then deemed "promotional". It's not promotional but vey valid and in fact correctly cited. How can this be appealed with additional sources added?
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.110.125.12 ( talk) 03:20, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
T Cannes, I just read the note on my talk. I just want to mention that I have been open to change, been always contributing with quality academic material, and western press, and had been attempting to even extend a hand of friendship to editors on the other side, am not sure why the ban on me comes at this moment of time. Please let me know what the concerns are and if I may be given a process in which I can defend myself, or the accussations made against me on which apprently the ban has been made. Dilip rajeev ( talk) 11:23, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I am just notifying you that there is a discussion over at the Blocks/Protections noticeboard at Commons regarding User:Jo0doe. As his blocking admin here on en-wiki, I figured that it would be proper to let you know. Regards, Lothar von Richthofen ( talk) 18:58, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello Tim, I have sent you an email regarding a sockpuppet. Thanks, nableezy - 16:42, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
I saw your comment and noticed that it came just moments after mine. I hope that you were not referring to me. I made one edit, a new edit that was never done bebore at Banias and one revert nearly 35 hours later! I sincerely hope you weren't referring to me.-- Jiujitsuguy ( talk) 18:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Good call. I had a feeling that it would be attacked after NBA negotiations went into a tailspin yesterday. hbdragon88 ( talk) 06:25, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
I immediately self reverted within seconds once I was provided with the link above. Look, if your looking to ban me just let me know so I won't waste any more time with this. I self-reverted almost immediately once I was provided with the link. Forgive me if I'm not completely up to speed with every nuance of IPCOLLAB. In addition I haven't edited in I-P for over eight months. And again, the minute I was provided with the link and read it, I self reverted. What more do you want for Christ sake?!-- Jiujitsuguy ( talk) 22:14, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
The discussion you closed before is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive224#Doncram NHRP stubs, in case you don't have every post you've ever made memorized. :-)-- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:53, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Personally, I still have reservations about the blanket blocks, particularly of HappyInGeneral, as per some of my comments at the AE thread. I was wondering what, if any, action you might deem appropriate for me to possibly have the ban on that editor lifted. Thank you for your attention. John Carter ( talk) 21:28, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks--I was checking into the odd edit summary at User:Kross to find that this editor already got hisself blocked. "LCV is back"--if this editor weren't so, well, you know, I'd be thinking of socking. Drmies ( talk) 03:57, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Please see here: [1]. The disruptive user whose IP was blocked has switched IPs. Faustian ( talk) 15:19, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
SharedIPArchiveBot ( talk · contribs) has edited about 5000 IP talk pages; I need to know which of those were recently blocked.
Is it possible to list contribs from SharedIPArchiveBot ( talk · contribs) in order of the block-date of the IP user page that it edited? Chzz ► 06:12, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
I am confused by your decision as closing admin. I have no problem with the ones you said to keep (except for Doug Anderson who wasn't put up for AfD). There was clearly no consensus that I could see to keep any of the other fighters. In fact, I'd say there was clear consensus to delete them. Most of them received zero support, except for a couple of IPs who gave no good reasons why everyone should be kept. If you want to say I put up too many names, I wouldn't argue that. However, a lot of editors spent the time to go through those articles and now you want them to do it again. I'd appreciate it if you could tell me how you could look at those statements and claim there was no consensus on most of those fighters. Papaursa ( talk) 00:25, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Please unrestrict my IP addresss 76.118.227.161 due to the fact that my delition of material on the Bule Army (Poland) page was confirmed by administrator Volunteer Marek yet when the other user did not like the outcome they reverted the page, and went to you to get me restricted. This is highly bias and unethical. So, again I ask that my IP address be un-restricted! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.162.211.76 ( talk) 16:22, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
See my comment here [3]. Volunteer Marek 16:22, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
I have filed a request to approve the NPP automated program. Thanks -- Mohamed Aden Ighe ( talk) 22:08, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Care to add yourself as a party commenting as one of the AE patrollers? -- Peter cohen ( talk) 14:26, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi - could you email me a copy please. Off2riorob ( talk) 00:21, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Timotheus,
I noticed you've permanently banned Epeefleche. Given that he's a longstanding editor with almost 90,000 edits, I am concerned. Can you help me understand why you've taken this action? Thanks. Jayjg (talk) 03:52, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Please give Fut.Perf. ☼ a shout. Thanks. [4] — A. Kupicki ( talk) 14:07, 29 November 2011 (UTC)