![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome to WP:WikiProject Death. The Singularity is near, and the Methuselah Foundation is helping in its approach, so our project might have no objects of study soon. :( As to "orange" on your user page, orange is not a colour, it is a color! :) Cheers. PPdd ( talk) 02:39, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
I have replied on the talk page.- RunningOnBrains( talk) 04:42, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Timl2k4. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Saros 131, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Do not blank a page and propose for speedy deletion as such; if you want a redirect deleted, please start a discussion at WP:RFD. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:34, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Oops, I'm really sorry. I meant to remove the other picture, when it was a precursor over the Bay of Campeche. I don't think it adds much of anything (since it's a generic blob of clouds), and there are already several relatively similar images. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 03:26, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
I am very sorry for not replying until now, but I wasn't intentionally not doing so. I got your message last night just as I was about to head off to bed, and in all honesty I forgot all about it the next day. As for the images, I feel the infrared image contributes significantly to the impact section, considering it displays the severity of convective activity (which is in essence what determines the degree of impact) associated with the storm. Similarly, the satellite image of Arlene developing contributes its fair share to the meteorological history—or genesis— of the storm. I do not take any stand against the removed image in question, though with a similar image for the infobox I personally feel it does not add to the article as much as the current ones. This is, nevertheless, just my opinion, so feel free to contest it and talk to other editors about it. Once again, I apologize for the delayed response and making it seem like I was inattentive toward your inquiry. ★ Auree talk 06:48, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Timl2k4. I happened to see your question about adminship on Fastily's page. An individual admin talkpage is probably not the best place to ask; I think your query will attract more attention and interest on Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship. Wikipedia does need more admins. However, there is no mechanism for adminning people for mundane tasks only; an admin is an admin is an admin. You may want to read a few RFA's, and perhaps swing by Wikipedia:Miniguide to requests for adminship to get a sense of the kind of questions that will be asked of candidates. Regards, Bishonen | talk 00:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC).
Hello. I noticed you tried to "fix" Template:R for convenience; however, it's not broken. You probably can't see the categories on the redirects because they're hidden categories. You need to set a user preference in order to see them. Just thought I'd let you know. McLerristarr | Mclay1 14:19, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Tim. I'm just letting you know I have closed your recent RFA early per WP:SNOW because there was no chances of it succeeding this time. I'd recommend that you be more active on Wikipedia and take the advises that other people have given you. Good luck. - Porch corpter ( talk/ contribs) 08:39, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
RTFM [ [2]] Kiefer. Wolfowitz 21:37, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Nope; it's block evasion. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I'm just letting you know that I have deleted the page that you inadvertently created in main space. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 07:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
If a page qualifies for more than one CSD criterion then by all means tag it for both criteria. If I see a page which doesn't qualify for the criterion it's been tagged for but does meet another criterion I will happily delete it under the other criterion instead, and I would imagine most admins would do the same. In this case I don't think the article met CSD G2 at the time you tagged it, because although it was very badly written it does look like an attempt to write an encyclopedia article rather than experiment with the editing interface. Hut 8.5 10:40, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Tim! You should not write again on my page, unless WP policy requires you to notify me. You should not send me e-mail, and in any event your account is now black-listed and I shan't receive any email from you. Sincerely, Kiefer. Wolfowitz 11:02, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
For the record, my email to Kiefer.Wolfowitz, which aparently prompted his talk page ban:
-- TimL ( talk) 11:56, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
You removed octaeteris from the Eclipse cycle page. Well, you commented it out. I mentioned this on a calendar-related list I belong to and someone mentioned that it has historically been an eclipse cycle so deserves to be listed. I suggested they update the page with that information and references. I know the description attached to octaeteris stated it is not an eclipse cycle, and maybe that's why you removed it. Anyway, I just thought I'd let you know this may be corrected down the road. I'm leaving it alone myself, because I don't actually know that much about octaeterides besides the math involved. Victor Engel ( talk) 19:29, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
is creating books useful on Wikipedia or its mostly for personal uses? (I ask this because its the only useful thing I can do for now).And how do I know that the book I'm creating is not created before?-- Irrational number ( talk) 18:58, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thanks for your help-- Irrational number ( talk) 19:19, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi I know that you may be asleep now, so answer me any time you can.I wanted to know how to translate articles.A little bit of information just to be able to start.thanks-- Irrational number ( talk) 08:49, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for asking many questions!but how can I "put" my article in some category? I want to translate the Platonic hydrocarbon article and put it in chemistry category in farsi, for example(small enough for a start!)-- Irrational number ( talk) 11:08, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome to WP:WikiProject Death. The Singularity is near, and the Methuselah Foundation is helping in its approach, so our project might have no objects of study soon. :( As to "orange" on your user page, orange is not a colour, it is a color! :) Cheers. PPdd ( talk) 02:39, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
I have replied on the talk page.- RunningOnBrains( talk) 04:42, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello Timl2k4. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Saros 131, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Do not blank a page and propose for speedy deletion as such; if you want a redirect deleted, please start a discussion at WP:RFD. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 13:34, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
Oops, I'm really sorry. I meant to remove the other picture, when it was a precursor over the Bay of Campeche. I don't think it adds much of anything (since it's a generic blob of clouds), and there are already several relatively similar images. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 03:26, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
I am very sorry for not replying until now, but I wasn't intentionally not doing so. I got your message last night just as I was about to head off to bed, and in all honesty I forgot all about it the next day. As for the images, I feel the infrared image contributes significantly to the impact section, considering it displays the severity of convective activity (which is in essence what determines the degree of impact) associated with the storm. Similarly, the satellite image of Arlene developing contributes its fair share to the meteorological history—or genesis— of the storm. I do not take any stand against the removed image in question, though with a similar image for the infobox I personally feel it does not add to the article as much as the current ones. This is, nevertheless, just my opinion, so feel free to contest it and talk to other editors about it. Once again, I apologize for the delayed response and making it seem like I was inattentive toward your inquiry. ★ Auree talk 06:48, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Timl2k4. I happened to see your question about adminship on Fastily's page. An individual admin talkpage is probably not the best place to ask; I think your query will attract more attention and interest on Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship. Wikipedia does need more admins. However, there is no mechanism for adminning people for mundane tasks only; an admin is an admin is an admin. You may want to read a few RFA's, and perhaps swing by Wikipedia:Miniguide to requests for adminship to get a sense of the kind of questions that will be asked of candidates. Regards, Bishonen | talk 00:10, 4 July 2011 (UTC).
Hello. I noticed you tried to "fix" Template:R for convenience; however, it's not broken. You probably can't see the categories on the redirects because they're hidden categories. You need to set a user preference in order to see them. Just thought I'd let you know. McLerristarr | Mclay1 14:19, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Tim. I'm just letting you know I have closed your recent RFA early per WP:SNOW because there was no chances of it succeeding this time. I'd recommend that you be more active on Wikipedia and take the advises that other people have given you. Good luck. - Porch corpter ( talk/ contribs) 08:39, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
RTFM [ [2]] Kiefer. Wolfowitz 21:37, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Nope; it's block evasion. Daniel Case ( talk) 06:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I'm just letting you know that I have deleted the page that you inadvertently created in main space. -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 07:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
If a page qualifies for more than one CSD criterion then by all means tag it for both criteria. If I see a page which doesn't qualify for the criterion it's been tagged for but does meet another criterion I will happily delete it under the other criterion instead, and I would imagine most admins would do the same. In this case I don't think the article met CSD G2 at the time you tagged it, because although it was very badly written it does look like an attempt to write an encyclopedia article rather than experiment with the editing interface. Hut 8.5 10:40, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Tim! You should not write again on my page, unless WP policy requires you to notify me. You should not send me e-mail, and in any event your account is now black-listed and I shan't receive any email from you. Sincerely, Kiefer. Wolfowitz 11:02, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
For the record, my email to Kiefer.Wolfowitz, which aparently prompted his talk page ban:
-- TimL ( talk) 11:56, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
You removed octaeteris from the Eclipse cycle page. Well, you commented it out. I mentioned this on a calendar-related list I belong to and someone mentioned that it has historically been an eclipse cycle so deserves to be listed. I suggested they update the page with that information and references. I know the description attached to octaeteris stated it is not an eclipse cycle, and maybe that's why you removed it. Anyway, I just thought I'd let you know this may be corrected down the road. I'm leaving it alone myself, because I don't actually know that much about octaeterides besides the math involved. Victor Engel ( talk) 19:29, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
is creating books useful on Wikipedia or its mostly for personal uses? (I ask this because its the only useful thing I can do for now).And how do I know that the book I'm creating is not created before?-- Irrational number ( talk) 18:58, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thanks for your help-- Irrational number ( talk) 19:19, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi I know that you may be asleep now, so answer me any time you can.I wanted to know how to translate articles.A little bit of information just to be able to start.thanks-- Irrational number ( talk) 08:49, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for asking many questions!but how can I "put" my article in some category? I want to translate the Platonic hydrocarbon article and put it in chemistry category in farsi, for example(small enough for a start!)-- Irrational number ( talk) 11:08, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |