![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | → | Archive 35 |
Hello, Re: the Esmee Visser article submission - the content is a carbon copy of the Dutch page for Esmee Visser. The Dutch version, incidentally, is also sourceless. (Edit: someone has inserted an ISU source, by the looks.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hhpop ( talk • contribs) 15:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
I hope you are well - you have not replied to last few messages.
As you requested I removed the links from The Sun and Facebook and have provided other external sources about the entry which include the BBC, Press Gazzette, Manchester Evening News and LBC.
Could you please read over the entry, would be great to hear from you and happy to make any other changes you deem necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asda3991 ( talk • contribs) 20:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
As a new wikipedia user I appreciate the assistance. Shawn M. Kent ( talk) 20:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback - unfortunately that's the best I can offer at this time in terms of sources.
I am very disappointed but no bother, maybe there will be more sources in the future.
Would just like to thank you for your time and feedback.
Best wishes, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asda3991 ( talk • contribs) 20:35, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing Banglar Bodhu, Theroadislong.
Unfortunately Winged Blades of Godric has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
None of the sources mention the film.How did you pass it without any tag?
To reply, leave a comment on Winged Blades of Godric's talk page.
Winged Blades Godric 07:03, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
I think the page now meets Wikipedia's standards
Hi @Theroadislong ,
In regards to the submission for Sherry Sufi, given that we have articles such Karina Okotel and Avi Yemini, who have similarities with Sufi in regards to being right-wing former or prospective candidates who have a public profile, hold political positions, and were featured in interviews and write opinion pieces, I believed the article is sufficiently notable. He has multiple television appearances both related and unrelated to his political candidacy. The original draft wasn't mine, but I've taken it up for consistency's sake. Thanks, Judeti ( talk) 15:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey Theroadislong, I saw you declined this draft on basis of notability. I'm not sure that was a fair assessment, given the three reliable sources I added to the article yesterday (Forbes, Vice, HuffPo) which are mainstream media outlets that have significant coverage of the subject of the article. Could you please take a moment to look over the article again? I think it easily meets WP:GNG. Thanks, AdA&D 14:45, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, please give me a call I have a few questions on how we can adjust the Donovan J. Greening wiki page so that it can be more reliable and remain on wikipedia. 248-225-0882 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.70.133.170 ( talk) 16:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
I don't understand. I made the mechanical fixes requested. Then the article was rejected for a completely different and more fundamental reason. I would not have made the mechanical fixes requested had I known earlier about the newest and different reasons for rejection. A lot of us understand that Wikipedia relies heavily on volunteers. All the more reason that respecting people's time is paramount.
I'm not sure what to do now. And even if these latest problems are fixed, whether Wikipedia will reject the article again for completely different reasons.
Camdavis (
talk)
18:41, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
I appreciate your quick feedback on the draft page for thank you for reviewing the draft for "Krishan A. Canekeratne". He truly is an interesting man from the creation of several major companies, receiving the Sri Lanka Sikhamani Honor to being the number 1 ranked under-16 table tennis player in Sri Lanka. I would love to be able to get this page up there for him. I have removed all in-line external hyperlinks as you requested to improve the overall readability.
I look forward to your re-review!
Greenough Ben ( talk) 12:59, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello! I saw back on the 14th of December, you reviewed my Liz Hannah page. I have added three sources, so I think it should be fine now! I am just telling you because it has not been reviewed again in around 24 days. Thanks for your initial review, and will accept and change anything that you point out. Thanks a ton for the help!
DrChicken24 ( talk) 15:25, 8 January 2018 (UTC)DrChicken24
Thanks for the heads-up on the YouTube. Will try to contact CBS directly since we probably have the only tape of that time period. Also, just FYI made a donation to Wikipedia Foundation with gratitude for your work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgroman ( talk • contribs) 20:47, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for your comments. No I didn't create this page, it was done by an academic at Exeter University but he asked me to check it for accuracy and provide citations, and then I ended up posting it myself because he found the publishing system confusing. It seemed to me was disproportionately long and detailed.
Regarding notability and verifiability, a lot of the facts in the biography are recorded: e.g. books and articles published. Would you suggest I ask him to try again, sticking only to these 'published' facts? Would you rather he actually published it, rather than me?
Thank you again
Orlando Murrin (
talk)
11:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Orlando Murrin ( talk) 11:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
can you please help me with the edit of my article? I've tried to follow all your notes and I've quoted each time certain peacock terms are used. It's my first time here, I'd love if you could point out more specific edits I can do to improve the article!
thanks
Bianca — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bgrandone80 (
talk •
contribs)
16:07, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for giving feedback on my article so quick! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nimbo.lo ( talk • contribs) 20:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I don't know what I have to change in this article that it can be published. Could you please tell me exactly what I need to change or give me examples in the text? I do not quite understand why this article is considered advertising. What is exactly the problem?
I look forward to your reply. regards
Hi Theroadislong,
I updated the sparx group draft page and resubmitted for publishing. I had originally not done enough citing; I found 5 or so articles that directly discuss Sparx group. There are many more articles in Japanese than English, wondering if I should add Japanese references as well.
Would appreciate if you could take a look when you get a chance.
Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparx.kfukui ( talk • contribs) 01:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
If you find more about fixing my references, please let me know! — Preceding unsigned comment added by StinkerB06 ( talk • contribs) 18:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
I'm new to Wikipedia editing and I accidentally deleted the template for speedy deletion that you put in the Tammie Shannon article I am working on. I want to finish the page and contest the speedy deletion properly—not trying to play dirty here—but can't figure out how to reinsert the template, can you add it back? Sorry to bother you
here's the link to the page I'm talking about
/info/en/?search=Tammie_Shannon
PJ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evan07x ( talk • contribs) 22:07, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Please tell me what exactly about Discogs makes it an unreliable source, so I can re-do the article with sources that will be considered reliable. Also please let me know what exactly (if anything) needs to be changed about the article besides what you mentioned in your comment.
Thanks.
Hi Theroadislong,
My apologies, I didn't see you last response. I do work for the company, I attempted to disclose that according to the guidelines.. but perhaps I did not do it right. The citations and references I made were all second party articles, and I did not use anything the company publishes. Please let me know if there is anything I can do.
Hi again, just read up about COI and sounds like I should not be publishing this article. Would it be allright if I ask a non-affiliated friend to start this page? Thank you
Thank you Sparx.kfukui ( talk) 01:54, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Sparx.kfukui ( talk) 01:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello.. I have unsuccessfully edited the article. bt I need help. I cannot seem to reference well and put everything in order. In short I am not able to fix the notability part of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eujoe ( talk • contribs) 09:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey,
I gave enough external links to support everything, I have mentioned.
So what's up with that page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shyam.alex ( talk • contribs) 12:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Would any of the several interviews that Vashmere has done be acceptable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael Johnathan Katz ( talk • contribs) 16:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, someone named Hut 8.5 deleted a page that I made for the investment bank that I work for (Focus Investment Banking). It is a real company with about 50 people who work there (www.focusbankers.com) I added it to the pages for "list of investment banks" and made it a page -- based on a number of pages for other banks. However the code is now gone, and I am afraid if I create it, Hut 8.5 will just speedy delete it again. What should I do?
FrozenMan ( talk) 19:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Why did you remove Georges Deicha? He has a sufficient notoriety in the French and German edition. Bestr regards Alfons Helbert Alfons Helbert ( talk) 06:51, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Theroadislong, yes this is the first article i created on Wiki. Following the reaction from the first attempt in December, we tried to keep the article as clean from marketing as possible. This is 100% factual now. Can you point me to what's wrong please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reubenv01 ( talk • contribs) 10:03, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Theroadislong
Thanks for taking the time to review the submission. May I ask what sections you think come across as an advertisement so that I can amend and resubmit. Furthermore I do work for GCV, however, I decided to submit this article for educational purposes not because I'm being paid to do so.
Kind regards,
Luca — Preceding unsigned comment added by LucaPeterson ( talk • contribs) 14:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear Theroadislong,
I wanted to let you know that I have been working very hard on this article and I have made all the changes you requested. I have also been studying how other wikipedia articles look like and I think that finally my article is starting to look like it should to be approved by you. I also added some citations, by the way. In conclusion, I have been doing my research and homework and I think you will find this new article to be much more aligned with the wikipedia style articles.
I wanted to ask your advice on something. I have found some relevant foreign language articles about the doctor. Do you think I should include them?
Finally, I wanted to ask you if I could get the article publishsed as is and then I can continue to add on it over time.
Can you let me know? :-)
I look forward to your feedback, and thank you for everything!
SaraGWik ( talk) 20:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
You posted a COI notice. I would note that user has been scruplous in noting his paid editing. Just sayin ... 22:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Theroadislong. Thanks for accepting my draft so very quickly, especially as it says there is a two month waiting list! Could you also look at my other similar articles Draft:Pathfinder Village and Draft:Monkokehampton? They are also places in Devon. Thanks. Ilyina Olya Yakovna ( talk) 11:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Theroadislong. I was reviewing Charles Akinyele Akindayomi, and had decided to nominate the same for Afd using the curation toolbar. When I clicked on the button to nominate, I got the message that the page was already up for nomination, and that the curation script was cancelling my nomination. But strangely, it went ahead and actually created the nom page. Just wanted to apologize for the inadvertent inconvenience this might have caused you. Thanks, Lourdes 17:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Kifanga, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Nick Moyes ( talk) 13:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Theroadislong, you recently reviewed my page kifanga and am looking forward to rectifying the issues you highlighted.But another editor tagged my page for speedy deletion.Am asking if you would please write to him informing him to reconsider my page as it is work in progress and that the notability issues highlighted can be sourced elsewhere is only that i have not yet referenced in the article yet. Let me know of the outcome.I would really appreciate your help on this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patpatrick ( talk • contribs) 16:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear Theroadislong Thank you for your input I have made some changes to page Sina Ghanbari, adding more independent sources.Please see if you like them. Thanks. Alex-h ( talk) 22:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
I am replying to your message sent to me earlier. I do not understand why you revised my edit back to your previous redirect. I clearly explained why I was taking down the redirect and that I was going to revise the page. I went to submit 8 hours' worth of edits just now only to have them completely erased due to your edit in the meantime. The current redirect is to a page that lists artists who claim to be Christian whom have produced EDM-type music. The redirect page is not a list of CEDM artists. These are two different things. The page that this is redirecting to is a mess anyways. Many of the listed artists are decades removed from their last production of Christian EDM music. Many of the listed artists are even improperly categorized under what that page does represent. The redirect page has completely outdated sources too. This page would be better off taken down than redirected there because, as of currently, it is spreading false information by redirecting the readers there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newens ( talk • contribs) 23:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Greetings Theroadislong and please forgive my intrusion to your talk page. I am a newbie AfC reviewer and I stumbled upon your name as an AfC reviewer on countless AfC submissions. I recently encountered an AfC submission and would be in need of your help and judgement. Hope you won't find it all too uncomfortable. My apologies if you do.
I declined the submission as I thought the list was redundant per WP:LISTCRUFT and not a legitimate encyclopaedic topic. Thanks in advance. EROS message 15:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi!
I checked out some of your articles. Great stuff! I have been doing my research for some time and finally ready to submit. I just submitted my first one for review. I saw that someone else tried to start it. Any advice or suggestions for this and future articles?
I look forward to hearing from you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabian0821 ( talk • contribs) 21:24, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
I am interested in the history of Nancy Wilson (basketball coach), plus I want to see if I screwed something up by interrupting.
I do a fair amount of editing, but I haven't been involved in the review process, so I don't know the protocols.
I stumbled across this for reasons I'm not now remembering, but I wanted to work on it because of my interest in the subject matter.
I see that you initially rejected this when it was in a sandbox, but, to your credit, you quickly apologized when you realized you misunderstood the subject of the draft.
I confess I am puzzled that you decided to move it to draft space (was there a request that I missed?) and then immediately rejected it. I agree it wasn't ready at the time for article space, but it isn't clear to me that moving it to draft space was useful. Am I missing something?
The original editor clearly did not (initially) know how to do refs, but figured it out and largely fixed them, but did not know how to remove the redundancies. Unfortunately, the editor hasn't edited since then. I hope they aren't disillusioned, but they did not enable email, so I don't know how to contact them.
I did some minor editing, and checked just about every reference to make sure it supported the text. IMO, it is fine now, so I moved it to artivle space. However, I see a template suggesting it is still part of the review process – am I right you are the reviewer? So Im writing this to determine next steps.
FYI, I'm traveling, and may have limited online time until Weddnsday.-- S Philbrick (Talk) 15:51, 15 January 2018 (UTC)-- S Philbrick (Talk) 03:57, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Theroadislong,
I removed your CSD template on Truebil. I originally found and cleaned up a lot of the COI in the article, and warned the user for COI - however, I don't feel that the subject is suitable for CSD A7: it has credible references (e.g. India Times) to indicate notability, even with the initial COI.
Feel free to put it in for AfD if you disagree.
All the best! | Naypta ✉ opened his mouth at 10:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey can you help me create this page for this director. I found out about her back in October. It was around for a bit that she is the first Jamaican filmmaker to have her work distributed. I think that is an amazing accomplishment.
I would appreciate your help. Thanks man.
Here's the link: /info/en/?search=Draft:Toni_Morgan_Haye — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabian0821 ( talk • contribs) 00:28, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey Theroadislong,
Thank you for reviewing the Dan Poole page. Can you please provide me with some help on what I need to do to get it into the mainspace? I've added external sources and sourced everything, so any help would be much appreciated.
Thank you in advance,
Niki Awaywithwords.ink ( talk) 21:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Theroadislong, you put up my page Motty Steinmetz up for deletion. I'm a bit confused about what the criteria is for weather a person is notable or not. Could you explain this please and what was wrong with the page Motty Steinmetz. Thank you very much Adam Bernstein — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam Bernstein ( talk • contribs) 17:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Would it be possible for you to have a look at a draft when I've changed it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam Bernstein ( talk • contribs) 13:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC) Hi can you take a look at this, does it meet all the necessary criteria? /info/en/?search=User:Adam_Bernstein/sandbox Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam Bernstein ( talk • contribs) 15:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much, I dint realise you could get articles reviewed before they went up. Adam Bernstein ( talk) 17:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Adam Bernstein
Hi There, My name is Alex Wilson and I'm trying to publish my friends Theodore Salisbury Wikipedia page but some reason got declined. If you could inform me of why and how to improve it that would be great.
Wilson 8297 (
talk)
21:49, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear Theroadislong Thank you for your input I have made some changes to page Sina Ghanbari, adding more independent sources. Please see if you like them. Thanks. Alex-h ( talk) 00:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Theroadislong for your concern, but I can assure you there is no Conflict of Interest from me. I contribute to my interests only, and I am not affiliated with any page I have contributed to. I am still quite new to contributing so I have stuck to only 2 pages as I improve my skills with Wiki syntax, rules, and reference building. I hope to be a good asset here on Wikipedia with the hope of creating pages. I haven't contributed any information that does not follow the rules and is backed by credible sources. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sadsignal ( talk • contribs) 14:03, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Every time I contribute to the University of the People page, user Adrin10 reverts my work. Why and what can be done about this? I provided information about Transfer Credits, with proof, and it has been removed. Also the I removed the Criticism section as the only reference is from a propaganda website, which I am lead to believe Adrin10 is affiliated with as much of his page contributions lead to this propaganda reference. As I am new, perhaps you can help me?
Hi, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Patrik Kincl, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
CASSIOPEIA( talk) 14:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
I've just tried to submit a Artist Bio page after a request from the artist, and it has been deleted?
Can you assist ?
Kind Regards
Kevin Klara Kazmi ( talk) 21:39, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
The article about child protection in Canada, can you request it? Bookbinder 01 ( talk) 07:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
I read your note on why you undid my edits on University of the People. I do not understand what is considered "promotional material" that I have referenced. My edits referenced 3rd party news sources (i.e. New York Times) as well as primary sources. My additions reflect factual articulation agreements that have been made between the University of the People and UC-Berkeley, University of Edinburgh, and NYU-Abu Dhabi. This is not promotional, but explain how it is in your opinion?
Additionally, you undid an edit which I added the fee for transfer credit under the Tuition section. What is wrong with that?
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cnelsonii ( talk • contribs) 13:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
For your information the picture I put up on the DJ VIRGIN page, it was me who took it, and with her permission so it is mine and not copyright
Diogopedrol (
talk)
16:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Sir,
I'm Leo, I'm working for Novares Group in the digital communication of the group.
I'm sorry, I don't speak very good english and I don't undersatnt what is the problem with the Novares Group page.
Can you explain me? I don't want to see this page deleted so if I have to modify some sentences, I will do it.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeoFermin ( talk • contribs) 16:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
I am writing to get some clarity on why the citations of "COI" and "Payment" for this article have appeared above the Article on Susan Merdinger. I represent Susan Merdinger, as Wikipedia user SusanGreene. However, neither I nor Ms. Merdinger created this article, or paid for it and have no relationship to whomever composed it. I did, however, make a recent very minor correction/addition to the article at the request of Susan Merdinger to honor a notable musician who was omitted from the list of collaborators by the original Wiki editor, and do not feel that the article should be flagged or taken down as a result, when clear notability of the subject of the article is established with verifiable sources. The addition of these flags or citations at the top is a source of concern for the subject of the article, Ms. Merdinger, because it is potentially damaging to her reputation and integrity. It would be better not to have the article at all. However, I have no idea how to remove either the citations at the top of the article or the article itself. Now, the article is reduced to a stub and most pertinent biographical and career information has been removed, which is what I think may have prompted the flag about "notability" to be inserted automatically. Please advise and make a recommendation. SusanGreene SusanGreene ( talk) 18:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar |
Thank you for your contributions on multiple pages and for your instruction on proper editing techniques! Sadsignal ( talk) 06:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC) |
Dear Mr. Theroadislong,
The Reason for my update to the page on Ken Ham was to remove information that gave away an obvious bias of the writer, as "what science(supposedly)" tells us has nothing to do with what Ken Ham believes. It is an evolutionists attempt to propogate his beliefs as something other than what they are (certainly not science), as such defining factors of (macro)-evolution, to which he is referring, are not repeatable or testable. As the theoretical physicist Dr. Michael Ebifegha specifically states in regards to those studying evolutionary ancestry, the study of the origins of DNA ¨do not (fall under the purview of science), because this event is not testable and repeatable¨ (xii). My reason for looking at the page in the first place is because I am writing a "Thesis" (not actually that long) on "Evolution in the Public Schools", and it deeply disturbed me that someone would so blatantly blur the lines between relevance and irrelevance, science and philosophy. What is sad is how many ignorant people are deceived by these claims that Macro-evolution is a scientific fact. It matters not if a large majority of specialist scientists agree with the model, it is still a belief. 75% of Americans are Christians, according to a recent poll, but it is still a belief- faith, the defining factor of religion.
In know you are dedicated to the informational quality of every page on wikipedia, and this addition lowered such vastly.
Anyways, thank you for your concern. I recognize I should have explained myself more fully originally (rather than just saying "removed irrelevant information".
Good day, sir. I hope you will consider returning what I edited.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.11.109.96 ( talk) 00:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Actually I wanted This Particular article I'm writing and others that ill do soon to be under the stub category. can you help with that?
Hello Theroadislong. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Azeez Shobwale Shobola, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: playing for Al-Hilal Club (Omdurman) and winning a national league and a national cup with your club is a sufficient claim of significance. Thank you. So Why 12:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Theroadislong. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tommy Cecil, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: writing songs for notable musicians is a credible claim of significance. Thank you. So Why 17:27, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear Reviewer (The road is long) Kindly have a look of the modified form of the page, you reviewed earlier. Will wait for your kind suggestion and approval to review this as soon as possible, as it has been in the reviewing queue for over two months.
Thanking you in anticiaption
Regards Innocent Cuty ( talk) 00:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() New:
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Hi,
I wrote to Doc James two weeks ago saying I believed his Jan. 15 revision of the Westbrook University entry was incomplete and biased. He has not responded. I had written an earlier entry, which he superseded with his.
Are there any steps I can take to get an agreeably accurate, fair and thorough entry for the university?
Thanks very much!
Gerryharrington ( talk) 02:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Greetings once again, Theroadislong. I was wondering if it'll be just to reject this submission under "what wikipedia is not" as it is to me that the submission is original research. EROS message 12:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Can you please tell me where you found the picture of Secretary Butler? I've known one existed, but I've been unable to locate one. I've written a book on Tennessee's secretaries of state, and Butler is one of the few I don't have a picture of. Thank you so much!
```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carolyn gregory ( talk • contribs) 15:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
So sorry to disturb you again, I was wondering if my declination on this album was logical.. What are your thoughts? Seems to me it has vague notability, poor sources and the tone is somewhat editorial. EROS message 08:33, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm the assistant operations manager for UCTV and one of my tasks is to update our long neglected Wikipedia page. It appears you removed the majority of the page claiming it was promotional. A list of our departments and their series hardly seems promotional to me and I'm very confused as to why it was removed. Thanks UCTVOpsAssistant ( talk) 21:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello Theroadislong, you've deleted the filmografie of the page mentioned above and I don't understand why. You've said, that Wikipedia is not a directory, but it is common to list the filmografie of an actor, a director, producer and so on. So why has it been deleted? I would like to restore it. KatharinaRB ( talk) 13:37, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your quick reply. The filmography is important to show the show the subjects notability so I would like to add it again. And if I do so without the sources of the own website - how it is common on every other wikipedia page of an actor, director and so on - is that ok with you? KatharinaRB ( talk) 14:03, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
@ Theroadislong the production company won an won an International Emmy in New York for one of their films A Day for a Miracle - which is very very rare for a German production company. Winning an International Emmy, which along with the Oscars are the most recognizable entertainment award worldwide. And the TV serie Murder by the lake was last year the most successful TV series on the broadcasting channel ZDF. So I think that should be enough to show the notability of the company. I will add the filmography again. KatharinaRB ( talk) 14:29, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
I appreciate the comments as I am relatively new to Wikipedia editing. However, there seems to be an aggression you are displaying. I am trying to add content that I truly believe a) I have a right to add and b) the Wikipedia community will enjoy and from which it will derive benefit. Please give me a chance to fix things before you pull everything down! Now my photos are gone? All of them from the gallery? Is your goal to winnow the field of content providers because I am becoming discouraged by this process.DocSavageNJ 16:40, 7 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DocSavageNJ ( talk • contribs)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | → | Archive 35 |
Hello, Re: the Esmee Visser article submission - the content is a carbon copy of the Dutch page for Esmee Visser. The Dutch version, incidentally, is also sourceless. (Edit: someone has inserted an ISU source, by the looks.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hhpop ( talk • contribs) 15:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
I hope you are well - you have not replied to last few messages.
As you requested I removed the links from The Sun and Facebook and have provided other external sources about the entry which include the BBC, Press Gazzette, Manchester Evening News and LBC.
Could you please read over the entry, would be great to hear from you and happy to make any other changes you deem necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asda3991 ( talk • contribs) 20:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
As a new wikipedia user I appreciate the assistance. Shawn M. Kent ( talk) 20:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback - unfortunately that's the best I can offer at this time in terms of sources.
I am very disappointed but no bother, maybe there will be more sources in the future.
Would just like to thank you for your time and feedback.
Best wishes, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asda3991 ( talk • contribs) 20:35, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing Banglar Bodhu, Theroadislong.
Unfortunately Winged Blades of Godric has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:
None of the sources mention the film.How did you pass it without any tag?
To reply, leave a comment on Winged Blades of Godric's talk page.
Winged Blades Godric 07:03, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
I think the page now meets Wikipedia's standards
Hi @Theroadislong ,
In regards to the submission for Sherry Sufi, given that we have articles such Karina Okotel and Avi Yemini, who have similarities with Sufi in regards to being right-wing former or prospective candidates who have a public profile, hold political positions, and were featured in interviews and write opinion pieces, I believed the article is sufficiently notable. He has multiple television appearances both related and unrelated to his political candidacy. The original draft wasn't mine, but I've taken it up for consistency's sake. Thanks, Judeti ( talk) 15:16, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey Theroadislong, I saw you declined this draft on basis of notability. I'm not sure that was a fair assessment, given the three reliable sources I added to the article yesterday (Forbes, Vice, HuffPo) which are mainstream media outlets that have significant coverage of the subject of the article. Could you please take a moment to look over the article again? I think it easily meets WP:GNG. Thanks, AdA&D 14:45, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, please give me a call I have a few questions on how we can adjust the Donovan J. Greening wiki page so that it can be more reliable and remain on wikipedia. 248-225-0882 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.70.133.170 ( talk) 16:07, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
I don't understand. I made the mechanical fixes requested. Then the article was rejected for a completely different and more fundamental reason. I would not have made the mechanical fixes requested had I known earlier about the newest and different reasons for rejection. A lot of us understand that Wikipedia relies heavily on volunteers. All the more reason that respecting people's time is paramount.
I'm not sure what to do now. And even if these latest problems are fixed, whether Wikipedia will reject the article again for completely different reasons.
Camdavis (
talk)
18:41, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
I appreciate your quick feedback on the draft page for thank you for reviewing the draft for "Krishan A. Canekeratne". He truly is an interesting man from the creation of several major companies, receiving the Sri Lanka Sikhamani Honor to being the number 1 ranked under-16 table tennis player in Sri Lanka. I would love to be able to get this page up there for him. I have removed all in-line external hyperlinks as you requested to improve the overall readability.
I look forward to your re-review!
Greenough Ben ( talk) 12:59, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello! I saw back on the 14th of December, you reviewed my Liz Hannah page. I have added three sources, so I think it should be fine now! I am just telling you because it has not been reviewed again in around 24 days. Thanks for your initial review, and will accept and change anything that you point out. Thanks a ton for the help!
DrChicken24 ( talk) 15:25, 8 January 2018 (UTC)DrChicken24
Thanks for the heads-up on the YouTube. Will try to contact CBS directly since we probably have the only tape of that time period. Also, just FYI made a donation to Wikipedia Foundation with gratitude for your work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgroman ( talk • contribs) 20:47, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for your comments. No I didn't create this page, it was done by an academic at Exeter University but he asked me to check it for accuracy and provide citations, and then I ended up posting it myself because he found the publishing system confusing. It seemed to me was disproportionately long and detailed.
Regarding notability and verifiability, a lot of the facts in the biography are recorded: e.g. books and articles published. Would you suggest I ask him to try again, sticking only to these 'published' facts? Would you rather he actually published it, rather than me?
Thank you again
Orlando Murrin (
talk)
11:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Orlando Murrin ( talk) 11:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
can you please help me with the edit of my article? I've tried to follow all your notes and I've quoted each time certain peacock terms are used. It's my first time here, I'd love if you could point out more specific edits I can do to improve the article!
thanks
Bianca — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bgrandone80 (
talk •
contribs)
16:07, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for giving feedback on my article so quick! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nimbo.lo ( talk • contribs) 20:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I don't know what I have to change in this article that it can be published. Could you please tell me exactly what I need to change or give me examples in the text? I do not quite understand why this article is considered advertising. What is exactly the problem?
I look forward to your reply. regards
Hi Theroadislong,
I updated the sparx group draft page and resubmitted for publishing. I had originally not done enough citing; I found 5 or so articles that directly discuss Sparx group. There are many more articles in Japanese than English, wondering if I should add Japanese references as well.
Would appreciate if you could take a look when you get a chance.
Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sparx.kfukui ( talk • contribs) 01:36, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
If you find more about fixing my references, please let me know! — Preceding unsigned comment added by StinkerB06 ( talk • contribs) 18:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
I'm new to Wikipedia editing and I accidentally deleted the template for speedy deletion that you put in the Tammie Shannon article I am working on. I want to finish the page and contest the speedy deletion properly—not trying to play dirty here—but can't figure out how to reinsert the template, can you add it back? Sorry to bother you
here's the link to the page I'm talking about
/info/en/?search=Tammie_Shannon
PJ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evan07x ( talk • contribs) 22:07, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Please tell me what exactly about Discogs makes it an unreliable source, so I can re-do the article with sources that will be considered reliable. Also please let me know what exactly (if anything) needs to be changed about the article besides what you mentioned in your comment.
Thanks.
Hi Theroadislong,
My apologies, I didn't see you last response. I do work for the company, I attempted to disclose that according to the guidelines.. but perhaps I did not do it right. The citations and references I made were all second party articles, and I did not use anything the company publishes. Please let me know if there is anything I can do.
Hi again, just read up about COI and sounds like I should not be publishing this article. Would it be allright if I ask a non-affiliated friend to start this page? Thank you
Thank you Sparx.kfukui ( talk) 01:54, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Sparx.kfukui ( talk) 01:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello.. I have unsuccessfully edited the article. bt I need help. I cannot seem to reference well and put everything in order. In short I am not able to fix the notability part of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eujoe ( talk • contribs) 09:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey,
I gave enough external links to support everything, I have mentioned.
So what's up with that page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shyam.alex ( talk • contribs) 12:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Would any of the several interviews that Vashmere has done be acceptable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael Johnathan Katz ( talk • contribs) 16:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello, someone named Hut 8.5 deleted a page that I made for the investment bank that I work for (Focus Investment Banking). It is a real company with about 50 people who work there (www.focusbankers.com) I added it to the pages for "list of investment banks" and made it a page -- based on a number of pages for other banks. However the code is now gone, and I am afraid if I create it, Hut 8.5 will just speedy delete it again. What should I do?
FrozenMan ( talk) 19:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Why did you remove Georges Deicha? He has a sufficient notoriety in the French and German edition. Bestr regards Alfons Helbert Alfons Helbert ( talk) 06:51, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Theroadislong, yes this is the first article i created on Wiki. Following the reaction from the first attempt in December, we tried to keep the article as clean from marketing as possible. This is 100% factual now. Can you point me to what's wrong please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reubenv01 ( talk • contribs) 10:03, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Theroadislong
Thanks for taking the time to review the submission. May I ask what sections you think come across as an advertisement so that I can amend and resubmit. Furthermore I do work for GCV, however, I decided to submit this article for educational purposes not because I'm being paid to do so.
Kind regards,
Luca — Preceding unsigned comment added by LucaPeterson ( talk • contribs) 14:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear Theroadislong,
I wanted to let you know that I have been working very hard on this article and I have made all the changes you requested. I have also been studying how other wikipedia articles look like and I think that finally my article is starting to look like it should to be approved by you. I also added some citations, by the way. In conclusion, I have been doing my research and homework and I think you will find this new article to be much more aligned with the wikipedia style articles.
I wanted to ask your advice on something. I have found some relevant foreign language articles about the doctor. Do you think I should include them?
Finally, I wanted to ask you if I could get the article publishsed as is and then I can continue to add on it over time.
Can you let me know? :-)
I look forward to your feedback, and thank you for everything!
SaraGWik ( talk) 20:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
You posted a COI notice. I would note that user has been scruplous in noting his paid editing. Just sayin ... 22:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Theroadislong. Thanks for accepting my draft so very quickly, especially as it says there is a two month waiting list! Could you also look at my other similar articles Draft:Pathfinder Village and Draft:Monkokehampton? They are also places in Devon. Thanks. Ilyina Olya Yakovna ( talk) 11:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Theroadislong. I was reviewing Charles Akinyele Akindayomi, and had decided to nominate the same for Afd using the curation toolbar. When I clicked on the button to nominate, I got the message that the page was already up for nomination, and that the curation script was cancelling my nomination. But strangely, it went ahead and actually created the nom page. Just wanted to apologize for the inadvertent inconvenience this might have caused you. Thanks, Lourdes 17:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Kifanga, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Nick Moyes ( talk) 13:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Theroadislong, you recently reviewed my page kifanga and am looking forward to rectifying the issues you highlighted.But another editor tagged my page for speedy deletion.Am asking if you would please write to him informing him to reconsider my page as it is work in progress and that the notability issues highlighted can be sourced elsewhere is only that i have not yet referenced in the article yet. Let me know of the outcome.I would really appreciate your help on this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patpatrick ( talk • contribs) 16:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear Theroadislong Thank you for your input I have made some changes to page Sina Ghanbari, adding more independent sources.Please see if you like them. Thanks. Alex-h ( talk) 22:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
I am replying to your message sent to me earlier. I do not understand why you revised my edit back to your previous redirect. I clearly explained why I was taking down the redirect and that I was going to revise the page. I went to submit 8 hours' worth of edits just now only to have them completely erased due to your edit in the meantime. The current redirect is to a page that lists artists who claim to be Christian whom have produced EDM-type music. The redirect page is not a list of CEDM artists. These are two different things. The page that this is redirecting to is a mess anyways. Many of the listed artists are decades removed from their last production of Christian EDM music. Many of the listed artists are even improperly categorized under what that page does represent. The redirect page has completely outdated sources too. This page would be better off taken down than redirected there because, as of currently, it is spreading false information by redirecting the readers there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newens ( talk • contribs) 23:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Greetings Theroadislong and please forgive my intrusion to your talk page. I am a newbie AfC reviewer and I stumbled upon your name as an AfC reviewer on countless AfC submissions. I recently encountered an AfC submission and would be in need of your help and judgement. Hope you won't find it all too uncomfortable. My apologies if you do.
I declined the submission as I thought the list was redundant per WP:LISTCRUFT and not a legitimate encyclopaedic topic. Thanks in advance. EROS message 15:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi!
I checked out some of your articles. Great stuff! I have been doing my research for some time and finally ready to submit. I just submitted my first one for review. I saw that someone else tried to start it. Any advice or suggestions for this and future articles?
I look forward to hearing from you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabian0821 ( talk • contribs) 21:24, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
I am interested in the history of Nancy Wilson (basketball coach), plus I want to see if I screwed something up by interrupting.
I do a fair amount of editing, but I haven't been involved in the review process, so I don't know the protocols.
I stumbled across this for reasons I'm not now remembering, but I wanted to work on it because of my interest in the subject matter.
I see that you initially rejected this when it was in a sandbox, but, to your credit, you quickly apologized when you realized you misunderstood the subject of the draft.
I confess I am puzzled that you decided to move it to draft space (was there a request that I missed?) and then immediately rejected it. I agree it wasn't ready at the time for article space, but it isn't clear to me that moving it to draft space was useful. Am I missing something?
The original editor clearly did not (initially) know how to do refs, but figured it out and largely fixed them, but did not know how to remove the redundancies. Unfortunately, the editor hasn't edited since then. I hope they aren't disillusioned, but they did not enable email, so I don't know how to contact them.
I did some minor editing, and checked just about every reference to make sure it supported the text. IMO, it is fine now, so I moved it to artivle space. However, I see a template suggesting it is still part of the review process – am I right you are the reviewer? So Im writing this to determine next steps.
FYI, I'm traveling, and may have limited online time until Weddnsday.-- S Philbrick (Talk) 15:51, 15 January 2018 (UTC)-- S Philbrick (Talk) 03:57, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Theroadislong,
I removed your CSD template on Truebil. I originally found and cleaned up a lot of the COI in the article, and warned the user for COI - however, I don't feel that the subject is suitable for CSD A7: it has credible references (e.g. India Times) to indicate notability, even with the initial COI.
Feel free to put it in for AfD if you disagree.
All the best! | Naypta ✉ opened his mouth at 10:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey can you help me create this page for this director. I found out about her back in October. It was around for a bit that she is the first Jamaican filmmaker to have her work distributed. I think that is an amazing accomplishment.
I would appreciate your help. Thanks man.
Here's the link: /info/en/?search=Draft:Toni_Morgan_Haye — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabian0821 ( talk • contribs) 00:28, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey Theroadislong,
Thank you for reviewing the Dan Poole page. Can you please provide me with some help on what I need to do to get it into the mainspace? I've added external sources and sourced everything, so any help would be much appreciated.
Thank you in advance,
Niki Awaywithwords.ink ( talk) 21:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Theroadislong, you put up my page Motty Steinmetz up for deletion. I'm a bit confused about what the criteria is for weather a person is notable or not. Could you explain this please and what was wrong with the page Motty Steinmetz. Thank you very much Adam Bernstein — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam Bernstein ( talk • contribs) 17:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Would it be possible for you to have a look at a draft when I've changed it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam Bernstein ( talk • contribs) 13:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC) Hi can you take a look at this, does it meet all the necessary criteria? /info/en/?search=User:Adam_Bernstein/sandbox Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam Bernstein ( talk • contribs) 15:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much, I dint realise you could get articles reviewed before they went up. Adam Bernstein ( talk) 17:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Adam Bernstein
Hi There, My name is Alex Wilson and I'm trying to publish my friends Theodore Salisbury Wikipedia page but some reason got declined. If you could inform me of why and how to improve it that would be great.
Wilson 8297 (
talk)
21:49, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear Theroadislong Thank you for your input I have made some changes to page Sina Ghanbari, adding more independent sources. Please see if you like them. Thanks. Alex-h ( talk) 00:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks Theroadislong for your concern, but I can assure you there is no Conflict of Interest from me. I contribute to my interests only, and I am not affiliated with any page I have contributed to. I am still quite new to contributing so I have stuck to only 2 pages as I improve my skills with Wiki syntax, rules, and reference building. I hope to be a good asset here on Wikipedia with the hope of creating pages. I haven't contributed any information that does not follow the rules and is backed by credible sources. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sadsignal ( talk • contribs) 14:03, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Every time I contribute to the University of the People page, user Adrin10 reverts my work. Why and what can be done about this? I provided information about Transfer Credits, with proof, and it has been removed. Also the I removed the Criticism section as the only reference is from a propaganda website, which I am lead to believe Adrin10 is affiliated with as much of his page contributions lead to this propaganda reference. As I am new, perhaps you can help me?
Hi, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Patrik Kincl, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
CASSIOPEIA( talk) 14:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
I've just tried to submit a Artist Bio page after a request from the artist, and it has been deleted?
Can you assist ?
Kind Regards
Kevin Klara Kazmi ( talk) 21:39, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
The article about child protection in Canada, can you request it? Bookbinder 01 ( talk) 07:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello,
I read your note on why you undid my edits on University of the People. I do not understand what is considered "promotional material" that I have referenced. My edits referenced 3rd party news sources (i.e. New York Times) as well as primary sources. My additions reflect factual articulation agreements that have been made between the University of the People and UC-Berkeley, University of Edinburgh, and NYU-Abu Dhabi. This is not promotional, but explain how it is in your opinion?
Additionally, you undid an edit which I added the fee for transfer credit under the Tuition section. What is wrong with that?
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cnelsonii ( talk • contribs) 13:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
For your information the picture I put up on the DJ VIRGIN page, it was me who took it, and with her permission so it is mine and not copyright
Diogopedrol (
talk)
16:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Sir,
I'm Leo, I'm working for Novares Group in the digital communication of the group.
I'm sorry, I don't speak very good english and I don't undersatnt what is the problem with the Novares Group page.
Can you explain me? I don't want to see this page deleted so if I have to modify some sentences, I will do it.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeoFermin ( talk • contribs) 16:21, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
I am writing to get some clarity on why the citations of "COI" and "Payment" for this article have appeared above the Article on Susan Merdinger. I represent Susan Merdinger, as Wikipedia user SusanGreene. However, neither I nor Ms. Merdinger created this article, or paid for it and have no relationship to whomever composed it. I did, however, make a recent very minor correction/addition to the article at the request of Susan Merdinger to honor a notable musician who was omitted from the list of collaborators by the original Wiki editor, and do not feel that the article should be flagged or taken down as a result, when clear notability of the subject of the article is established with verifiable sources. The addition of these flags or citations at the top is a source of concern for the subject of the article, Ms. Merdinger, because it is potentially damaging to her reputation and integrity. It would be better not to have the article at all. However, I have no idea how to remove either the citations at the top of the article or the article itself. Now, the article is reduced to a stub and most pertinent biographical and career information has been removed, which is what I think may have prompted the flag about "notability" to be inserted automatically. Please advise and make a recommendation. SusanGreene SusanGreene ( talk) 18:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar |
Thank you for your contributions on multiple pages and for your instruction on proper editing techniques! Sadsignal ( talk) 06:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC) |
Dear Mr. Theroadislong,
The Reason for my update to the page on Ken Ham was to remove information that gave away an obvious bias of the writer, as "what science(supposedly)" tells us has nothing to do with what Ken Ham believes. It is an evolutionists attempt to propogate his beliefs as something other than what they are (certainly not science), as such defining factors of (macro)-evolution, to which he is referring, are not repeatable or testable. As the theoretical physicist Dr. Michael Ebifegha specifically states in regards to those studying evolutionary ancestry, the study of the origins of DNA ¨do not (fall under the purview of science), because this event is not testable and repeatable¨ (xii). My reason for looking at the page in the first place is because I am writing a "Thesis" (not actually that long) on "Evolution in the Public Schools", and it deeply disturbed me that someone would so blatantly blur the lines between relevance and irrelevance, science and philosophy. What is sad is how many ignorant people are deceived by these claims that Macro-evolution is a scientific fact. It matters not if a large majority of specialist scientists agree with the model, it is still a belief. 75% of Americans are Christians, according to a recent poll, but it is still a belief- faith, the defining factor of religion.
In know you are dedicated to the informational quality of every page on wikipedia, and this addition lowered such vastly.
Anyways, thank you for your concern. I recognize I should have explained myself more fully originally (rather than just saying "removed irrelevant information".
Good day, sir. I hope you will consider returning what I edited.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.11.109.96 ( talk) 00:01, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Hi Actually I wanted This Particular article I'm writing and others that ill do soon to be under the stub category. can you help with that?
Hello Theroadislong. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Azeez Shobwale Shobola, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: playing for Al-Hilal Club (Omdurman) and winning a national league and a national cup with your club is a sufficient claim of significance. Thank you. So Why 12:39, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello Theroadislong. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Tommy Cecil, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: writing songs for notable musicians is a credible claim of significance. Thank you. So Why 17:27, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Dear Reviewer (The road is long) Kindly have a look of the modified form of the page, you reviewed earlier. Will wait for your kind suggestion and approval to review this as soon as possible, as it has been in the reviewing queue for over two months.
Thanking you in anticiaption
Regards Innocent Cuty ( talk) 00:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() New:
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Hi,
I wrote to Doc James two weeks ago saying I believed his Jan. 15 revision of the Westbrook University entry was incomplete and biased. He has not responded. I had written an earlier entry, which he superseded with his.
Are there any steps I can take to get an agreeably accurate, fair and thorough entry for the university?
Thanks very much!
Gerryharrington ( talk) 02:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Greetings once again, Theroadislong. I was wondering if it'll be just to reject this submission under "what wikipedia is not" as it is to me that the submission is original research. EROS message 12:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Can you please tell me where you found the picture of Secretary Butler? I've known one existed, but I've been unable to locate one. I've written a book on Tennessee's secretaries of state, and Butler is one of the few I don't have a picture of. Thank you so much!
```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carolyn gregory ( talk • contribs) 15:51, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
So sorry to disturb you again, I was wondering if my declination on this album was logical.. What are your thoughts? Seems to me it has vague notability, poor sources and the tone is somewhat editorial. EROS message 08:33, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm the assistant operations manager for UCTV and one of my tasks is to update our long neglected Wikipedia page. It appears you removed the majority of the page claiming it was promotional. A list of our departments and their series hardly seems promotional to me and I'm very confused as to why it was removed. Thanks UCTVOpsAssistant ( talk) 21:11, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Hello Theroadislong, you've deleted the filmografie of the page mentioned above and I don't understand why. You've said, that Wikipedia is not a directory, but it is common to list the filmografie of an actor, a director, producer and so on. So why has it been deleted? I would like to restore it. KatharinaRB ( talk) 13:37, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your quick reply. The filmography is important to show the show the subjects notability so I would like to add it again. And if I do so without the sources of the own website - how it is common on every other wikipedia page of an actor, director and so on - is that ok with you? KatharinaRB ( talk) 14:03, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
@ Theroadislong the production company won an won an International Emmy in New York for one of their films A Day for a Miracle - which is very very rare for a German production company. Winning an International Emmy, which along with the Oscars are the most recognizable entertainment award worldwide. And the TV serie Murder by the lake was last year the most successful TV series on the broadcasting channel ZDF. So I think that should be enough to show the notability of the company. I will add the filmography again. KatharinaRB ( talk) 14:29, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
I appreciate the comments as I am relatively new to Wikipedia editing. However, there seems to be an aggression you are displaying. I am trying to add content that I truly believe a) I have a right to add and b) the Wikipedia community will enjoy and from which it will derive benefit. Please give me a chance to fix things before you pull everything down! Now my photos are gone? All of them from the gallery? Is your goal to winnow the field of content providers because I am becoming discouraged by this process.DocSavageNJ 16:40, 7 February 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DocSavageNJ ( talk • contribs)