![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
The article
Federalist No. 5 you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Federalist No. 5 for comments about the article, and
Talk:Federalist No. 5/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
BritneyErotica --
BritneyErotica (
talk)
03:22, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Catherine Samba-Panza you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Grnrchst --
Grnrchst (
talk)
16:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
The article
Lucretia Garfield you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Lucretia Garfield for comments about the article, and
Talk:Lucretia Garfield/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Sammielh --
Sammielh (
talk)
17:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Federalist No. 6 you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Federalist No. 6 for comments about the article, and
Talk:Federalist No. 6/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
AryKun --
AryKun (
talk)
16:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Federalist No. 7 you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Federalist No. 7 for comments about the article, and
Talk:Federalist No. 7/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Fritzmann2002 --
Fritzmann2002 (
talk)
03:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The article
Iron Man you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Iron Man for comments about the article, and
Talk:Iron Man/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Chiswick Chap --
Chiswick Chap (
talk)
12:41, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Thebiguglyalien. I'm quite pleased to see that my prophecy has been fulfilled. I'm soliciting feedback on Pruitt–Igoe, an article about an ill-fated public housing project in St. Louis, in preparation for FAC, and given your prior work on American history I thought you might be interested. I'd welcome any comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Pruitt–Igoe/archive1. rblv ( talk) 22:30, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Goddess Barnstar | |
For your incredible work on articles on women. Saw you haven't edited for a while, and hope you're well. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 21:56, 8 December 2023 (UTC) |
The article
Maria Stromberger you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Maria Stromberger and
Talk:Maria Stromberger/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ppt91 --
Ppt91 (
talk)
19:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For military dictatorship. While it may not be perfect, it is thus far a great encapsulation of the subject. I always struggled with such broad topics with global implications and applications and thus tend to shy away from them. I'm sure this has been a mighty undertaking and wish you well as you continue to improve the article. Indy beetle ( talk) 06:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC) |
The article
Maria Stromberger you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Maria Stromberger for comments about the article, and
Talk:Maria Stromberger/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ppt91 --
Ppt91 (
talk)
14:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Women in Green Editathon October '23 | |
At last – here is your barnstar! Thank you for your excellent contributions to GA nominations Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, Samia Suluhu Hassan, Cesária Évora, Iveta Radičová, Nona Gaprindashvili and Catherine Samba-Panza, along with GA reviews completed for Stronger Than Jesus, Jessica Alexander, Reigning Still, Inez Robb, Ashraf Dehghani and Patricia Banks Edmiston during the WiG "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article editathon. You've done some really great work this year, and I hope everything is well going into the holiday season. Best, Alanna the Brave ( talk) 17:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC) |
Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
The article
Anaximenes of Miletus you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Anaximenes of Miletus and
Talk:Anaximenes of Miletus/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Phlsph7 --
Phlsph7 (
talk)
09:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
The article
Anaximenes of Miletus you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Anaximenes of Miletus for comments about the article, and
Talk:Anaximenes of Miletus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Phlsph7 --
Phlsph7 (
talk)
07:40, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
The article
Rose Cleveland you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Rose Cleveland for comments about the article, and
Talk:Rose Cleveland/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Generalissima --
Generalissima (
talk)
16:03, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2024 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close on 31 January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth ( talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius ( talk · contribs · email), and Frostly ( talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
It's been a while since you last edited. Because the departure was so sudden, I wanted to check in and see if you were well. Please feel free to use the email function to respond. Best, ~ Pbritti ( talk) 07:45, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Jane Irwin Harrison you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
RoySmith --
RoySmith (
talk)
19:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
The article
Jane Irwin Harrison you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Jane Irwin Harrison for comments about the article, and
Talk:Jane Irwin Harrison/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
RoySmith --
RoySmith (
talk)
02:01, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello @ Thebiguglyalien: - I read an essay on inclusion criteria for WP:YEARS when reviewing the same on the 2023 & 2024. I noticed there were some links to a few community discussions relating to ownership of the page by a few users which you started. I am concerned that this issue has arisen again on 2024, in part against the sudden influx of non-regular editors around the new year. I have tried to push-back against this, but have had limited success. I would be grateful if you could take a look at the situation.
You may also be interested to know that the user topic banned in the community discussions has returned as a sockpuppet. I have started a SPI and would be grateful for any suggestions from you. 33ABGirl ( talk) 06:11, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
The article
Cesária Évora you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Cesária Évora and
Talk:Cesária Évora/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SusunW --
SusunW (
talk)
18:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
The article
Cesária Évora you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Cesária Évora for comments about the article, and
Talk:Cesária Évora/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SusunW --
SusunW (
talk)
14:43, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
About this comment on merging articles: I have, for many years, encouraged editors to weed the {{ linkfarm}}. It's not unusual for one editor to remove some Wikipedia:External links at dozens of articles, and then get reverted at one or two. And my advice is: Move on. Specifically, in the time it takes to even start a discussion, the original editor could clean out links in another 10 articles. Even if they "win" the discussion, the opportunity cost (10 missed articles) was higher than the "win" at a single article could possibly be.
I suggest that this might be relevant for merging stubs. If someone objects, then just move on. Keep the event in your list and add a {{ Main}} template. It's very likely that you can accomplish more good by merging up undisputed articles than by talking about the occasional disputed one. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 02:53, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
I just saw your statement at the arbitration page and your table [1]. This Table includes, for example, two participants of almost all these discussions who always voted "Pal". Do you imply they have been engaged in an illegal coordination? I do not think so. This table just reflects two trivial facts:
Hiya TBUA, glad to see you're back. I'd like to apologise for your failed GANs - I grabbed Zeno of Elea before she timed out, but missed the others. You've got two open GANs in your papers series, and I'd like to review both of them to be honest, but I'm aware that you've been away for a while and out of mainspace editing. Are you OK with me reviewing them now, or do you want to leave them? (we're likely going to have a backlog drive in the coming months, so they'll certainly get picked up by the end of it) Frzzl talk; contribs 22:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Thor (Marvel Comics), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CBR and Heroes Reborn.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
I think, generally, you were right about the lack of continued coverage in most of these incidents, however in for a few of them I do believe there is future significant coverage that constitutes lasting notability (though it wasn't present in the articles in question at the time). I would add the later coverage back if I split them out again. This isn't an immediate thing though PARAKANYAA ( talk) 14:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
I agree with the post above, you are deleting lots of hard work and just blindly merging articles without even gaining consensus, I'm reverting some of your edits. Please have a little respect and take anything to Afd that you don't think should exist on the site before making such drastic changes. Inexpiable ( talk) 20:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for reaching out to me regarding my attempt to rewrite and GA/FA Ida Saxton McKinley. As I was doing a check of the article, I saw the section "Murder of George Saxton" included which addresses that topic but I don't think has much relevance to McKinley's life. I'm contemplating creating a separate page for the Saxton family and dropping that section there, but I'm on the fence on whether the article would be able to stand on its own two legs. From the research I've done so far, her ancestors seem semi-notable but I haven't found a whole lot to create a decent article. I'm reluctant to remove the section, so I'm seeking a second opinion [a] and your history of working on First Ladies is one of reason why I'm seeking your opinion. Thanks! ❤History Theorist❤ 22:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
The article
Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya for comments about the article, and
Talk:Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Grnrchst --
Grnrchst (
talk)
15:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
If there were a script that would make one of these tables for any given set of discussions, that would be a very cool and useful tool. I'm not at all surprised by the results -- including that it seems the majority of participants did not participate in the majority of RFCs -- i.e., different editors are deciding these discussions, it's not always the same "block".
I had a bunch of questions, feel free to ignore or answer whichever ones you want:
What do you think about making the table sortable?
Adding horizontal and vertical totals?
For whatever method was used to categorize "Isr" and "Pal" (I assume that maps to "support"/"oppose", "keep"/"delete", etc. as applicable?), is it possible to categorize the outcomes of the 15 discussions as either "Isr" or "Pal" or neither/other/no consensus/whatever? I see some green bars and some blue bars, and I want to know if the outcomes--the consensus--is either a green bar or a blue bar or patchwork or what.
Also "match rate" would be interesting. Someone might vote one color all the time, but it tells a whole different story if their match rate is 0% or 100% or 50%.
It's a cool table, thanks for putting it together. Levivich ( talk) 06:18, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
The article
Zeno of Elea you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Zeno of Elea and
Talk:Zeno of Elea/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
L'OrfeoGreco --
L'OrfeoGreco (
talk)
22:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
The article
Zeno of Elea you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Zeno of Elea for comments about the article, and
Talk:Zeno of Elea/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
L'OrfeoGreco --
L'OrfeoGreco (
talk)
14:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
I didn't want to derail that thread more, so I'm posting my response here. I think project-level rejection/ignorance of NOTNEWS, PRIMARY, and SUSTAINED is a hugely under-acknowledged issue, and the only way to really tackle it is for more editors familiar with PAGs to get involved in niche deletion discussions etc. I've had the DELSORTs for sportspeople, academics, academic journals, and nobility watchlisted for a while now, but I wish there was some sort of yapperbot-like service that could alert us to a random selection of active discussions that only have one or two DELSORT tags. That way we wouldn't have to watch a whole category we're otherwise disinterested in but could still provide an outsider perspective at the AfDs very few people normally see. JoelleJay ( talk) 05:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Please revert this edit immediately as it is a violation of the 1RR rule imposed on the Red Sea crisis article. At this moment, I am in the process of adding more references including this article titled, “US-Iran proxy war rages back to life in Iraq”, which satisfies your issue. Either way, please revert immediately. The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 18:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
The article
Nona Gaprindashvili you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Nona Gaprindashvili for comments about the article, and
Talk:Nona Gaprindashvili/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
BennyOnTheLoose --
BennyOnTheLoose (
talk)
00:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edith Roosevelt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christ Episcopal Church.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Thor Volume 2 Issue 11.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey, on my draft of Ida Saxton McKinley, I'm working on the historic assessment as it is an easy section to write. Is it alright if I copy the description of the study that Siena College performs on the First Ladies? I've poked around multiple FL articles and they seem to have the exact same description. I might end up modifying it later, but is it alright for me to use the description? I'm a bit nervous as this is my first attempt at a GA and I want to avoid as much trouble as I can. ❤History Theorist❤ 04:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Text I'd Use
|
---|
Since 1982 Siena College Research Institute has periodically conducted surveys asking historians to assess American first ladies according to a cumulative score on the independent criteria of their background, value to the country, intelligence, courage, accomplishments, integrity, leadership, being their own women, public image, and value to the president. [1] |
HistoryTheorist, it shouldn't be an issue. Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia goes into detail, but really all you have to worry about is writing "Copied content from [[<page name>]]; see that page's history for attribution" or something similar in the edit summary. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 04:32, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Federalist No. 24 you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
AryKun --
AryKun (
talk)
20:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Federalist No. 23 you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
AryKun --
AryKun (
talk)
20:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Federalist No. 1 you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
AryKun --
AryKun (
talk)
20:04, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Federalist No. 25 you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
AryKun --
AryKun (
talk)
20:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 29 March 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/March 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by user:dying, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!— Wehwalt ( talk) 16:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
The article
Samia Suluhu Hassan you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Samia Suluhu Hassan and
Talk:Samia Suluhu Hassan/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Firefangledfeathers --
Firefangledfeathers (
talk)
12:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
The article
Autocracy you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Autocracy and
Talk:Autocracy/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ljleppan --
Ljleppan (
talk)
07:01, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
The article
Samia Suluhu Hassan you nominated as a
good article has failed ; see
Talk:Samia Suluhu Hassan for reasons why
the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Firefangledfeathers --
Firefangledfeathers (
talk)
16:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
The article
Autocracy you nominated as a
good article has failed ; see
Talk:Autocracy for reasons why
the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ljleppan --
Ljleppan (
talk)
14:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
The article
Federalist No. 5 you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Federalist No. 5 for comments about the article, and
Talk:Federalist No. 5/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
BritneyErotica --
BritneyErotica (
talk)
03:22, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Catherine Samba-Panza you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Grnrchst --
Grnrchst (
talk)
16:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
The article
Lucretia Garfield you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Lucretia Garfield for comments about the article, and
Talk:Lucretia Garfield/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Sammielh --
Sammielh (
talk)
17:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Federalist No. 6 you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Federalist No. 6 for comments about the article, and
Talk:Federalist No. 6/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
AryKun --
AryKun (
talk)
16:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Federalist No. 7 you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Federalist No. 7 for comments about the article, and
Talk:Federalist No. 7/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Fritzmann2002 --
Fritzmann2002 (
talk)
03:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
The article
Iron Man you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Iron Man for comments about the article, and
Talk:Iron Man/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Chiswick Chap --
Chiswick Chap (
talk)
12:41, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Thebiguglyalien. I'm quite pleased to see that my prophecy has been fulfilled. I'm soliciting feedback on Pruitt–Igoe, an article about an ill-fated public housing project in St. Louis, in preparation for FAC, and given your prior work on American history I thought you might be interested. I'd welcome any comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Pruitt–Igoe/archive1. rblv ( talk) 22:30, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Goddess Barnstar | |
For your incredible work on articles on women. Saw you haven't edited for a while, and hope you're well. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 21:56, 8 December 2023 (UTC) |
The article
Maria Stromberger you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Maria Stromberger and
Talk:Maria Stromberger/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ppt91 --
Ppt91 (
talk)
19:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For military dictatorship. While it may not be perfect, it is thus far a great encapsulation of the subject. I always struggled with such broad topics with global implications and applications and thus tend to shy away from them. I'm sure this has been a mighty undertaking and wish you well as you continue to improve the article. Indy beetle ( talk) 06:24, 15 October 2023 (UTC) |
The article
Maria Stromberger you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Maria Stromberger for comments about the article, and
Talk:Maria Stromberger/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ppt91 --
Ppt91 (
talk)
14:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Women in Green Editathon October '23 | |
At last – here is your barnstar! Thank you for your excellent contributions to GA nominations Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, Samia Suluhu Hassan, Cesária Évora, Iveta Radičová, Nona Gaprindashvili and Catherine Samba-Panza, along with GA reviews completed for Stronger Than Jesus, Jessica Alexander, Reigning Still, Inez Robb, Ashraf Dehghani and Patricia Banks Edmiston during the WiG "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article editathon. You've done some really great work this year, and I hope everything is well going into the holiday season. Best, Alanna the Brave ( talk) 17:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC) |
Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
The article
Anaximenes of Miletus you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Anaximenes of Miletus and
Talk:Anaximenes of Miletus/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Phlsph7 --
Phlsph7 (
talk)
09:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
The article
Anaximenes of Miletus you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Anaximenes of Miletus for comments about the article, and
Talk:Anaximenes of Miletus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Phlsph7 --
Phlsph7 (
talk)
07:40, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
The article
Rose Cleveland you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Rose Cleveland for comments about the article, and
Talk:Rose Cleveland/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Generalissima --
Generalissima (
talk)
16:03, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2024 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close on 31 January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth ( talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius ( talk · contribs · email), and Frostly ( talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:21, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
It's been a while since you last edited. Because the departure was so sudden, I wanted to check in and see if you were well. Please feel free to use the email function to respond. Best, ~ Pbritti ( talk) 07:45, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Jane Irwin Harrison you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
RoySmith --
RoySmith (
talk)
19:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
The article
Jane Irwin Harrison you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Jane Irwin Harrison for comments about the article, and
Talk:Jane Irwin Harrison/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
RoySmith --
RoySmith (
talk)
02:01, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello @ Thebiguglyalien: - I read an essay on inclusion criteria for WP:YEARS when reviewing the same on the 2023 & 2024. I noticed there were some links to a few community discussions relating to ownership of the page by a few users which you started. I am concerned that this issue has arisen again on 2024, in part against the sudden influx of non-regular editors around the new year. I have tried to push-back against this, but have had limited success. I would be grateful if you could take a look at the situation.
You may also be interested to know that the user topic banned in the community discussions has returned as a sockpuppet. I have started a SPI and would be grateful for any suggestions from you. 33ABGirl ( talk) 06:11, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
The article
Cesária Évora you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Cesária Évora and
Talk:Cesária Évora/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SusunW --
SusunW (
talk)
18:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
The article
Cesária Évora you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Cesária Évora for comments about the article, and
Talk:Cesária Évora/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
SusunW --
SusunW (
talk)
14:43, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
About this comment on merging articles: I have, for many years, encouraged editors to weed the {{ linkfarm}}. It's not unusual for one editor to remove some Wikipedia:External links at dozens of articles, and then get reverted at one or two. And my advice is: Move on. Specifically, in the time it takes to even start a discussion, the original editor could clean out links in another 10 articles. Even if they "win" the discussion, the opportunity cost (10 missed articles) was higher than the "win" at a single article could possibly be.
I suggest that this might be relevant for merging stubs. If someone objects, then just move on. Keep the event in your list and add a {{ Main}} template. It's very likely that you can accomplish more good by merging up undisputed articles than by talking about the occasional disputed one. WhatamIdoing ( talk) 02:53, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
I just saw your statement at the arbitration page and your table [1]. This Table includes, for example, two participants of almost all these discussions who always voted "Pal". Do you imply they have been engaged in an illegal coordination? I do not think so. This table just reflects two trivial facts:
Hiya TBUA, glad to see you're back. I'd like to apologise for your failed GANs - I grabbed Zeno of Elea before she timed out, but missed the others. You've got two open GANs in your papers series, and I'd like to review both of them to be honest, but I'm aware that you've been away for a while and out of mainspace editing. Are you OK with me reviewing them now, or do you want to leave them? (we're likely going to have a backlog drive in the coming months, so they'll certainly get picked up by the end of it) Frzzl talk; contribs 22:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Thor (Marvel Comics), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CBR and Heroes Reborn.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
I think, generally, you were right about the lack of continued coverage in most of these incidents, however in for a few of them I do believe there is future significant coverage that constitutes lasting notability (though it wasn't present in the articles in question at the time). I would add the later coverage back if I split them out again. This isn't an immediate thing though PARAKANYAA ( talk) 14:52, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
I agree with the post above, you are deleting lots of hard work and just blindly merging articles without even gaining consensus, I'm reverting some of your edits. Please have a little respect and take anything to Afd that you don't think should exist on the site before making such drastic changes. Inexpiable ( talk) 20:13, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for reaching out to me regarding my attempt to rewrite and GA/FA Ida Saxton McKinley. As I was doing a check of the article, I saw the section "Murder of George Saxton" included which addresses that topic but I don't think has much relevance to McKinley's life. I'm contemplating creating a separate page for the Saxton family and dropping that section there, but I'm on the fence on whether the article would be able to stand on its own two legs. From the research I've done so far, her ancestors seem semi-notable but I haven't found a whole lot to create a decent article. I'm reluctant to remove the section, so I'm seeking a second opinion [a] and your history of working on First Ladies is one of reason why I'm seeking your opinion. Thanks! ❤History Theorist❤ 22:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
The article
Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya for comments about the article, and
Talk:Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Grnrchst --
Grnrchst (
talk)
15:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
If there were a script that would make one of these tables for any given set of discussions, that would be a very cool and useful tool. I'm not at all surprised by the results -- including that it seems the majority of participants did not participate in the majority of RFCs -- i.e., different editors are deciding these discussions, it's not always the same "block".
I had a bunch of questions, feel free to ignore or answer whichever ones you want:
What do you think about making the table sortable?
Adding horizontal and vertical totals?
For whatever method was used to categorize "Isr" and "Pal" (I assume that maps to "support"/"oppose", "keep"/"delete", etc. as applicable?), is it possible to categorize the outcomes of the 15 discussions as either "Isr" or "Pal" or neither/other/no consensus/whatever? I see some green bars and some blue bars, and I want to know if the outcomes--the consensus--is either a green bar or a blue bar or patchwork or what.
Also "match rate" would be interesting. Someone might vote one color all the time, but it tells a whole different story if their match rate is 0% or 100% or 50%.
It's a cool table, thanks for putting it together. Levivich ( talk) 06:18, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
The article
Zeno of Elea you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Zeno of Elea and
Talk:Zeno of Elea/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
L'OrfeoGreco --
L'OrfeoGreco (
talk)
22:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
The article
Zeno of Elea you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Zeno of Elea for comments about the article, and
Talk:Zeno of Elea/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
L'OrfeoGreco --
L'OrfeoGreco (
talk)
14:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
I didn't want to derail that thread more, so I'm posting my response here. I think project-level rejection/ignorance of NOTNEWS, PRIMARY, and SUSTAINED is a hugely under-acknowledged issue, and the only way to really tackle it is for more editors familiar with PAGs to get involved in niche deletion discussions etc. I've had the DELSORTs for sportspeople, academics, academic journals, and nobility watchlisted for a while now, but I wish there was some sort of yapperbot-like service that could alert us to a random selection of active discussions that only have one or two DELSORT tags. That way we wouldn't have to watch a whole category we're otherwise disinterested in but could still provide an outsider perspective at the AfDs very few people normally see. JoelleJay ( talk) 05:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Please revert this edit immediately as it is a violation of the 1RR rule imposed on the Red Sea crisis article. At this moment, I am in the process of adding more references including this article titled, “US-Iran proxy war rages back to life in Iraq”, which satisfies your issue. Either way, please revert immediately. The Weather Event Writer ( Talk Page) 18:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
The article
Nona Gaprindashvili you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Nona Gaprindashvili for comments about the article, and
Talk:Nona Gaprindashvili/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
BennyOnTheLoose --
BennyOnTheLoose (
talk)
00:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edith Roosevelt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christ Episcopal Church.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Thor Volume 2 Issue 11.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:56, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Hey, on my draft of Ida Saxton McKinley, I'm working on the historic assessment as it is an easy section to write. Is it alright if I copy the description of the study that Siena College performs on the First Ladies? I've poked around multiple FL articles and they seem to have the exact same description. I might end up modifying it later, but is it alright for me to use the description? I'm a bit nervous as this is my first attempt at a GA and I want to avoid as much trouble as I can. ❤History Theorist❤ 04:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Text I'd Use
|
---|
Since 1982 Siena College Research Institute has periodically conducted surveys asking historians to assess American first ladies according to a cumulative score on the independent criteria of their background, value to the country, intelligence, courage, accomplishments, integrity, leadership, being their own women, public image, and value to the president. [1] |
HistoryTheorist, it shouldn't be an issue. Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia goes into detail, but really all you have to worry about is writing "Copied content from [[<page name>]]; see that page's history for attribution" or something similar in the edit summary. Thebiguglyalien ( talk) 04:32, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Federalist No. 24 you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
AryKun --
AryKun (
talk)
20:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Federalist No. 23 you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
AryKun --
AryKun (
talk)
20:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Federalist No. 1 you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
AryKun --
AryKun (
talk)
20:04, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Federalist No. 25 you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
AryKun --
AryKun (
talk)
20:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 29 March 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/March 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by user:dying, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!— Wehwalt ( talk) 16:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
The article
Samia Suluhu Hassan you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Samia Suluhu Hassan and
Talk:Samia Suluhu Hassan/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Firefangledfeathers --
Firefangledfeathers (
talk)
12:43, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
The article
Autocracy you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Autocracy and
Talk:Autocracy/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ljleppan --
Ljleppan (
talk)
07:01, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
The article
Samia Suluhu Hassan you nominated as a
good article has failed ; see
Talk:Samia Suluhu Hassan for reasons why
the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Firefangledfeathers --
Firefangledfeathers (
talk)
16:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
The article
Autocracy you nominated as a
good article has failed ; see
Talk:Autocracy for reasons why
the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Ljleppan --
Ljleppan (
talk)
14:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)