|
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
List of EastEnders characters. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
5 albert square (
talk)
02:42, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. anemone projectors 17:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of unseen Coronation Street Characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unseen Coronation Street Characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JuneGloom07 Talk 14:50, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baldwin family (Coronation Street) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baldwin family (Coronation Street) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KAP03 Talk • Contributions 03:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Koljanc (
talk •
contribs)
17:54, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
22:49, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
AnemoneProjectors. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Zsa Zsa Carter have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
anemone
projectors—
11:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Zsa Zsa Carter. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —
anemone
projectors—
14:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
How is anything I did vandalism? Don't threaten me just because you want your simple ways to prevail. Why should her extended family not be included in her infobox just because she's never been on screen with them?! That is idiotic. TazminDaytime ( talk) 14:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
House Frey (A song of Ice and Fire), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the
Articles for Creation template atop the page. —
Insert
CleverPhrase
Here
00:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
You added Bianca's cousins to the infobox claiming because they are family, they are noted. But just because the characters are family, it doesn't mean automatic inclusion. They are included depending on the significance the character. With her Beale/Fowler relatives, they have pretty much been depicted as separate from Bianca, who associated more with the Brannings. But even with some of the Brannings, she is non notable like with Amy, Ricky etc who are just children who appear on a recurring basis. Grangehilllover ( talk) 13:17, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:House Frey (A song of Ice and Fire), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:34, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Oshwah. I noticed that in
this edit to
List of EastEnders characters (2001), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
22:24, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:TazminDaytime reported by User:Chrissymad (Result: ). Thank you.
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
17:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, TazminDaytime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " House Frey".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 10:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
|
Please do not
attack other editors, as you did at
List of EastEnders characters. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
5 albert square (
talk)
02:42, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. anemone projectors 17:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of unseen Coronation Street Characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unseen Coronation Street Characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JuneGloom07 Talk 14:50, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baldwin family (Coronation Street) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baldwin family (Coronation Street) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KAP03 Talk • Contributions 03:25, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Koljanc (
talk •
contribs)
17:54, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
22:49, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
AnemoneProjectors. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Zsa Zsa Carter have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. —
anemone
projectors—
11:05, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Zsa Zsa Carter. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —
anemone
projectors—
14:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
How is anything I did vandalism? Don't threaten me just because you want your simple ways to prevail. Why should her extended family not be included in her infobox just because she's never been on screen with them?! That is idiotic. TazminDaytime ( talk) 14:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
House Frey (A song of Ice and Fire), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the
Articles for Creation template atop the page. —
Insert
CleverPhrase
Here
00:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
You added Bianca's cousins to the infobox claiming because they are family, they are noted. But just because the characters are family, it doesn't mean automatic inclusion. They are included depending on the significance the character. With her Beale/Fowler relatives, they have pretty much been depicted as separate from Bianca, who associated more with the Brannings. But even with some of the Brannings, she is non notable like with Amy, Ricky etc who are just children who appear on a recurring basis. Grangehilllover ( talk) 13:17, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:House Frey (A song of Ice and Fire), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:34, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Oshwah. I noticed that in
this edit to
List of EastEnders characters (2001), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
~Oshwah~
(talk)
(contribs)
22:24, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:TazminDaytime reported by User:Chrissymad (Result: ). Thank you.
CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
17:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, TazminDaytime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " House Frey".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 10:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)