Thanks for uploading File:Oddjob 007.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 17:05, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Stop cutting out the relevant info and original research from good articles. This was the first and final warning. -- Slider2k ( talk) 09:41, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
lololol -- Niemti ( talk) 10:28, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
FYI, Sjones notified me of the IP who attacked you on your talk page, and was block evading, and he has been blocked. I'm notifying you since you made the effort to notify Dennis Brown, which probably means you wanted something to be done. Sergecross73 msg me 02:08, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Per previous comments left by others, 1 2 could you please leave edit summaries. They are a great help to others and are an adopted convention, especially when making potentially controversial edits such as the removal of images. Please also refer to Talk:Flashback (video game)#Flashback Origins. Thanks. -- Trevj ( talk) 06:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:40, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
I see from your Block log [1] that you've been blocked twice. If you want to get blocked again, and for a good deal longer time, you're going about it the right way. Your comment [2] at WP:RSN is completely out of bounds and a personal attack. I see that you posted the identical attack [3] at the WP:RFC examining your editing behavior generally. It is one thing to disagree with another editor on a point of interpretation of policy; it is quite another to call the editor a liar for doing so. Please refactor these attacks; if not, it will be reported to the appropriate forum for administrator action. Fladrif ( talk) 13:43, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
And I think stalking me continously for nearly a year now and constantly trying to recruit people into his obsessive crusade is "completely out of bounds and a personal attack" (also: it's hardly the first time I've caught him telling such blatant untruths in relation to me, and I'm even actively trying not to read anything he writes - what I'm doing is a complete opposite of his neveredning harrassment, as I'm staying away and trying to ignore him as much as it's possible, and he only rarely manages to troll me into reacting like that). -- Niemti ( talk) 13:50, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Niemti, I've tried to stay out of discussions involving you, but I'm now going to step in in my capacity as an Admin. You do a lot of good work around Wikipedia- despite your odd insistence on only doing the bare minimum necessary, you have gotten a lot of articles to GA. Even with those positives, however, your general attitude and demeanor are beginning to overwhelm your contributions. In seemingly the majority of discussions you are involved in, you belittle and insult anyone who disagrees with your positions, regardless of policy. You have a consistent history of ignoring any consensus or rebuke that you don't want to pay attention to. You regularly find yourself in edit wars, seemingly in an attempt to shut down opposition by force rather than discussion. Disputes that you are involved in are now a weekly fixture at the WP:VG talk page- and large groups of committed, hard-working editors now refuse to involve themselves in anything you are a part of, a group that included me until today. There is an active movement to get you topic-banned from all video game-related articles, something which has never happened before as afar as I know in the nearly 7 years I've been here. I don't think the issue is video game articles, however- I think the issue is your attitude.
Wikipedia is a collaborative project. While every editor doesn't have to work directly with other editors, they can't work against them or actively disrupt the group as a whole or the project ceases to function. You've demonstrated that you are unwilling or unable to work collaboratively and non-disruptively, and that outweighs any article contributions you make.
As such, I am giving you this warning: stop acting combatively, aggressively, and dismissively, and stop disrupting the project. If you continue, I'm going to start blocking you at each offense- 2 weeks to start with, with every successive block doubling in length. I hope that this will encourage you to act in a non-disruptive manner, and allow you to continue to enjoy writing articles, but I expect that it will in any case stop the disruption. -- Pres N 18:50, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
(unindent) Right. Well, either you have read and understood what I've warned you about, or you're unable to- trying to deflect the problem to be Sjones following you or not knowing Sergecross is an admin too or that Izno was actually disrupting you does not actually make me forget what we were actually talking about or show any willingness on your part to change. You've been warned, you know what the consequences will be if you continue, other people know about it, so I'll back out of this increasingly obtuse discussion and wait and see. -- Pres N 20:26, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
(Reinstated the warning I gave earlier for context) - 3 days ago I told you that I would block you if you started picking fights and acting aggressively again- your consistent, repeated lack of civility had pushed you over the line to be blocked before, but I didn't feel right blocking you without warning you first. Today, you called SJones23 a stalker 4 times ( [7], [8], [9], [10]) and started an argument at Talk:Jill Valentine/GA2 with FutureTrillionaire, Wizardman, and J Milburn that then spilled over into WT:GAN wherein you were, as usual, dismissive of the opinions of others, condescending ("I hope you learned something new today, and welcome to Wikipedia."), and completely unable to be reasoned with. (For future reference: poor sources may not be in the "quickfail" criteria, but the reviewer was within their rights to just regular-fail the article for that reason. You could have fixed the article with half the effort you put into "being right" on the talk page.) Is this latest example of rudeness worthy of being blocked on it's own? Maybe. But when it's added to the massive heap of incivility over the past weeks/months/years that got your original account banned, it's the trigger that I warned you about 3 days ago.
Blocked for two weeks. Next time is a month; I'll continue to double times if necessary. -- Pres N 01:49, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
That he's stalking me constantly without a pause nor end in sight is a long estabilished fact, and yet he only occasionally manages to troll me into getting a rise like that. I wish if there was just a mode "users to ignore". -- Niemti ( talk) 08:46, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Also actually it's totally cool and I ain't even mad, I needed a break anyway. But the "ignore" option might be something Wikipedia would use of. -- Niemti ( talk) 08:59, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Niemti. I think you must be very careful when your wiki- health supply is close to zero. If you want to last longer, you probably should edit less videogames and make less GA nominations. Why bring anything to GA level if there are so many stubs and even subjects not covered by any articles? And speaking about videogames, do not you think that we have way too much of this stuff already? I realize that other subjects could be more controversial, but as long as they are not high profile or at least not edited by many people (you should check edit history and talk page), you are going to be safe.
Are you OK with me reviewing this? I don't know how you felt after that Darkwatch review, but I have another GA nom up there and, in keeping with my practice, I review (at least) one for any one I nominate. I also try to review the one that's gone unreviewed the longest, and at this time it's this one.
I gave it a quick once-over and it looks alright, although obviously I want to do an in-depth review. Since you're blocked, I would be happy to transclude the review subpage here (assuming the blocking admin's OK with it; I can't imagine he wouldn't be). Post your answer here; I'll check back. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:06, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
How about just see you in 2 weeks or so? Because I'm not even going to log in really unil then. Darkwatch was cool and speaking of KOF I've got the original The King of Fighters '94 done previously. -- Niemti ( talk) 10:31, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry I disappeared from the review process. I'm in school, and finals came around and did a number on me. I'll be updating the page over the next couple of days to implement some of the things we talked about myself. TI. Gracchus ( talk) 18:46, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
You have previously commented on Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Niemti.
As an outside editor, I have moved that this RFC/U be closed. If you wish to comment on the Motion to close, please do so here. Fladrif ( talk) 14:40, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at WP:AN regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is " RfC proposal for community sanctions against Niemti". Thank you. Please make any statement that you may wish to make in the section below. It will be transcluded to the AN discussion. Sandstein 12:15, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Oh hi. Long story short so I won't be "ranting" (or what not) this time:
-- Niemti ( talk) 12:13, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
After skipping through through the thread, some comments on comments:
-- Niemti ( talk) 14:04, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
In response to your comment, in fact I hadn't noticed your work at
Morgan le Fay, which I haven't done much work on in several years, and we certainly haven't interacted there. At any rate it's just misdirection; as far as I remember, other than the
Anita Sarkeesian debacle I've never dealt with you at any of the articles or forums that concern us here. However, the briefest of looks into your other contributions shows that you've displayed the same serious issues that got you banned from that topic in many other areas. Your intransigence in forcing through your low standards and personal interpretations of the Good Article procedures, rather than collaborating with others to create actual, well, good articles, is one of those problems.--
Cúchullain
t/
c
21:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Niemti, what in the world happened when I was on wikibreak? Honestly, I left Wikipedia for awhile because of one user rather then make a huge fight about peanuts. Hopefully, you will have come to see things a bit different after your 'break'. You are a good editor and contributed a great amount of content to the video game section of Wikipedia. My advice would be to update things that no one currently watches like a hawk and if it is popular, make sure its not connected to any people you currently have issues with. Wikipedia is huge and getting bigger everyday. I'll be on more, so drop me a message when you can. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 03:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps you did not notice, but some admins on AN express willingness to block you again at the first sign of incivility, edit war or whatever. Here is a couple of ways to avoid it. First, if someone reverted your edit (even about tag), you must start discussion at article talk page, wait for their response and do not revert them back, even if they are wrong, unless you came to an agreement. And if you did not come to agreement, you still should not revert them back. Otherwise, you will be blocked. Second, in case of any content disagreements, you should always use only article talk page, not another user page. My very best wishes ( talk) 18:57, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Per this ANI discussion: AN discussion
The community has determined that you are now topic banned from GA articles, with the specific ban phrased as:
This is effective immediately and had no expiration, though you may appeal to Arbcom or to the Community in due course (after the passage of at least six months is customary, or more typically a year).
Additionally, I would like to note to you that there was approaching a consensus to indefinitely community ban you from editing entirely, though it in the end only had about 60% support. Though I understand this is a complex situation with many participants, some of whom clearly support your participation, it is clear that a large number of users feel that your participation was a net negative for the encyclopedia. Editors who approach these levels of community support for a complete editing ban usually get banned if they continue the behaviors that got the ban proposal going in the first place.
I would like to urge that you review how you are participating on Wikipedia, take the criticisms leveled by your critics seriously, and work to avoid such levels of conflict in the future. You've been around for a long time with the prior main and this account. You know how to step back and find a new balance point. For your sake, please take the time to do so.
Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert ( talk) 22:08, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Just wondering if you could shine some light on the couple of questions I've posted on the talk page? Cheers. Samwalton9 ( talk) 22:42, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blockbuster ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I was just wondering if I missed something when you reverted my edits on Makoto (Street Fighter) that removed that one category on her being a fictional martial artist. I just checked the category myself, so is it because it's a container category? I was unaware, so sorry about that. TheStickMan [✆Talk] 13:54, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes, she's a karateka. -- Niemti ( talk) 19:12, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Would it be possible to place an summary on your edits so that other editors may understand why you are making a change? Thanks. Student7 ( talk) 14:38, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Psylocke MvC2.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:26, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metal Gear Solid (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page E3 ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I hope you do not mind me adding List of films featuring diabetes to the "See also" section in Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters. I cited the film at the list article, but there has been some debate about the list itself and what belongs on the list. I think that this film's inclusion is fairly clear-cut and that cross-linking is appropriate here. Let me know if you disagree. Thanks, Erik ( talk | contribs) 15:55, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Sure, why not? -- Niemti ( talk) 20:38, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. I don't intend to expand so much Wesker's article. I see that source in Dr. Wily's article, and so I thought it could be useful put it in the article. About the OPSM it's a good source, and I found some interesting articles (like this and this) that can help me to create a article for Dr. Nefarious (currently it's a redirect). Just for curiosity: you're Brazilian? Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 01:07, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
I only added Transformers to that category if they appeared in video games. I was curious as to why you thick they DO NOT belong in the category "Robot character in video games". DO you think they are not robots? OR that they did not appear in video games? Mathewignash ( talk)
Maybe you should sometimes read the descriptions in the categories. -- Niemti ( talk) 21:21, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Shouldn't the name of the category be something like "Robot characters originating in video games"? Also, even with that stipulation, there are some Transformers characters whose first appearance is a video game. I started discussion about it on the video game wiki project, please come there and give your opinions there. Mathewignash ( talk) 12:58, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
No, all of these categories are named this way. -- Niemti ( talk) 16:21, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Why this edit to David (A.I. character)? Jason Quinn ( talk) 12:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know that I think you're doing a really good job staying calm and civil in the discussions going around about the categories for video game characters- you're disagreeing with other editors (though I think you're correct) but you're doing so without getting angry and uncivil. As long as you keep that up, I'm glad you didn't get banned. -- Pres N 18:13, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
You realize you can talk to me if there is something you think I do not understand. For example, if you think that the formatting of an article should be one way, you could cite an article for example, or you could explain the policy in a polite way. To just revert what I had carefully done with no explanation is not a friendly gesture, especially when I am the one who is shepherding this article through the Good Article nomination process right now. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 23:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for commenting on the category name change proposal. I hope you understand that it just seems illogical to have a category called "Robot characters in video games" and then exclude robot characters who appeared in video games from being listed. I just changed the proposal to simply change it to "Category:Video game robots", which I think would solve the problem, since the emphasis would become "video game" characters who are "robots"... Mathewignash ( talk) 11:57, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
If it's gong to make you happy. -- Niemti ( talk) 11:59, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
This message is being sent to you let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You do not need to participate however, you are invited to help find a resolution. The thread is " Ghost in the Shell, Talk:Ghost in the Shell". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 15:27, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Instead of deleting, you should've just correct "Chechen language" to "Cyrillic script". -- bender235 ( talk) 06:51, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
It's English Wikipedia, we don't use "Arabic sript" when mentioning some Arab American. -- Niemti ( talk) 08:23, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
"I have blocked the IP address for severe incivility including anyone operating from it for 24 hours. I shall not block for longer in case it is a public computer system. The underlying accusation of sockpupeteering is more serious, however and will have to be looked at in greater depth."
SERIOUSLY? Also, such a great secret, no one ever knew. -- Niemti ( talk) 12:02, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Also, it wasn't quite the intervention that I was looking for. But I guess the stupid "accusation of sockpupeteering" is more important than what ammounts to character assassination on the entire group of people when the world is interested in the issue. Just take a look at this list:
A few controversial people, all of whom are responsible for the violence in the last 2 decades (not even evaluating them otherwise), plus 1 random sportsman (just one of many notable Chechen martial artists) (and previously, even a non-Chechen Arab militant) - an entirety of "notable Chechens". Yeah. What a nation, right? -- Niemti ( talk) 12:17, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
SNAAAAKE!! ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
"Severe incivility" was just me writing "I'm bringing it the fucking ANI" to break an edit war ( which I did), regarding the above. Also, as someone comes to check it, you can also forward the above to this very thread (I think it's extremely important for this very biased list to not be posted to this article, now when there's a sudden global attention - you can forward it too). Niemti ( talk) 12:33, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There is currently no direct block on this account ( ✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 12:36, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have unblocked your IP (your account was never blocked) to allow you to comment on socking enquiry.--Fil e Éireann 12:54, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
just saw some sort of block thing in my watchlist ... good grief ... what the hell didja do now? — Ched : ? 13:43, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Wrote "I'm bringing it the fucking ANI" while unlogged before logging in to do just this. -- Niemti ( talk) 13:46, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Niemti. Can you give a look here? I'm working in some video game characters (as well anime characters) I missed in Wikipedia, and once I know you help to maintain virtually all video game characters (it's easy to proove this seeing the history of them) I came here to ask your opinion and some suggestions, and even your contribution with those "sub-articles". Notice that now I'm focus reception section despite some of them have more than it. What can you say about it? My antecipated thanks. Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 07:41, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mongol invasions of Chechnya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avars ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:04, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ghost in the Shell S.A.C. 2nd GIG Motoko Kusanagi.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. TomStar81 ( Talk) 04:10, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to File:Ghost in the Shell S.A.C. 2nd GIG Motoko Kusanagi.png. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 05:24, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Goro MK comic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:XCOM logo 2012.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:16, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
There was a Garibaldi Brigade in the Spanish Civil War, previously the Garibaldi Battalion. As there is an article on that, I've changed the redirect to go there. The XII International took over from the Brigade, which then formed a battalion in it. I've also moved it to Garibaldi Brigade without the s. If an article gets written about similarly named outfits operating in Italy itself, the redirect can be usurped, and a hatnote added for the XII. Until then, I feel it's performing a function. I'm not an expert but a jack of all trades (except American football...), and am always willing to have a discussion over something I've jumped into. Peridon ( talk) 13:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Garibaldi Brigades (note the prular form): http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigate_Garibaldi -- Niemti ( talk) 14:14, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Your name came up in a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Before ANI. -- Lexein ( talk) 09:11, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Milana Terloeva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chechen Wars ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 23:19, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I "apparently" didn't. -- Niemti ( talk) 08:06, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Category:Fictional sorceresses, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker ( talk) 20:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
I've noticed you've been reverting edits related to the removal of information regarding "BIOHAZARD DASH" originally being BIOHAZARD 2. First off, this is completely incorrect. DASH was an idea fielded by Yoshiki Okamoto, general manager of development at CAPCOM at the time, while BIO2 was already in development. The reason Okamoto's idea was never followed up on was because they wanted to focus on the game they were already making. It was never in development. Secondly, the purported source (PlayStation Universe) is almost entirely speculation and hearsay the author hadn't researched. It doesn't cite the source for DASH (a single interview with Okamoto in Genki PlayStation). The basic ideas for DASH were carried over to the Sega Saturn port of the original BIO HAZARD game. This led to confusion within the UK press at the time that led to the Saturn port being labeled "BIOHAZARD DASH" for a while.
DASH was never an "attempt" at creating anything. It was solely a briefly fielded idea (one of many) that was shot down before it became anything more than a concept. No work was done on it, and it has no relation to BIOHAZARD 1.5 or BIOHAZARD 2. Project Umbrella ( talk) 19:59, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
But at least thanks to you I just learned about Sengoku Biohazard (but this article is still so bad). -- Niemti ( talk) 17:33, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.-- Canoe1967 ( talk) 17:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Ada is mentioned on a first-name basis in BH1. My edit was about John Clemens' second name not being in the final version, but being in the demo version. Since you brought it up though, yes, Ada was mentioned by name in the file even in the demo (along with the original eleven Trevor's Notes that were also removed from the final version, and at that stage, "B.O.W." was also originally "B.H.W." - Biohazard Weapon). These changes were enacted by Yasuyuki Saga after the departure of scenario writer Kenichi Iwao in late '95. Her personality and occupation were not planned in the first game, aside from the fact that she was John Clemens' girlfriend. At the beginning of development for the second game (the stage known as "1.5"), an Umbrella researcher named Linda was created. However, she was renamed Ada Wong in order to draw a connection to the first game, with her Chinese surname added since no surname was written for her in the first game and her character design was half-Chinese. The character and her name were kept after 1.5 was scrapped, although her occupation and personality were completely altered. In the final version, she was a spy for Umbrella's rival company who infiltrated the Arklay Laboratory posing as a researcher and became Clemens' girlfriend in order to gain information. There was no retcon involved at any stage since the only changes occurred during production before the plot was complete. The addition of her previously non-existent surname in the second game is not a retcon. Project Umbrella ( talk) 15:44, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
And if you want to be actually useful, Chris Redfield needs a lot of work ( Albert Wesker too). Resident Evil (video game) is also only so-so for the game's caliber (just compare with Resident Evil 2 or Resident Evil 4). -- Niemti ( talk) 17:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Could you explain undo my changes in Spetsnaz article? -- Rezonansowy ( talk) 17:38, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Spetsnaz GRU this way. -- Niemti ( talk) 19:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for changing Rikimaru's pic to official artwork and removing the fan art that had been there for years. Razdower ( talk) 16:54, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
A focused and clean discussion of the future of the article is underway, because you made comments on Ghost in the Shell I am notifying you for your input in the debate. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 03:53, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kelly Hu may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:59, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --- The Old Jacobite The '45 16:00, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
You need to relax and remain civil at all times Niemti, I have tried my best to assist in your disputes, but when you respond in a hostile or abrasive way it makes me wonder why I even bother. Wikipedia is not perfect and idealism is one thing, but you shouldn't burn bridges or wage edit wars that will only serve to get you blocked. Even good changes will be reverted if you get blocked. Take your issues to DRN before you edit war, that way if a bunch of editors agree it will not be YOU who gets blocked for edit warring. Besides, by doing it that way other editors will start to think of you in a better light. Besides, I doubt you like fighting over these matters, trust other editors to see it your way and bring it to WP:DRN next time. Because if you edit war again, I will not come to your defense, but I will be at DRN when and if you chose to heed my advice. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 12:13, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
I don't think the problem is any "dispute" to be resolved, I believe the problem is rather how to reinstate all these countless whimsically reverted good edits everywhere in the film/series articles. That's the problem. -- Niemti ( talk) 16:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I agree this article probably isn't salvageable, but it's somewhat poor form to neither mention the AfD in the edit summary that added it, nor leave a message on the talk page of article's creator. -- McGeddon ( talk) 13:00, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Ah, I forgot. -- Niemti ( talk) 13:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ivy Valentine may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:21, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shinobido: Way of the Ninja may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
...you didn't question the reliability of a source written by someone called "Cherry Liquor"? o_O-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 03:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cockneys vs Zombies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles II ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:35, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
We use WP:NPOV not WP:ILIKEIT as a standard. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 20:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Category:Fictional American people of Dutch descent in video games, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Robofish ( talk) 20:43, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Matty.007. Niemti, thanks for creating Annica Smedius!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Just needs references, then is good to go
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Matty.007 13:44, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ibuki SFXT.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 08:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Annica Smedius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TV4 ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:38, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
How come here you removed the picture of Sunstar the unicorn? She's an important char, I think it is cool to have pictures of major chars, maybe you could add others too? Ranze ( talk) 06:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:World War Z film poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 05:18, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
So, this "kangkung" thing was indeed a vandalism? At first I was quite, well, confused when I noticed that you reverted my edit but then I saw that you replaced this "kangkung" thing with Kung Lao. Glad that you solved the problem. -- Jovaen ( talk) 15:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
No wonder those guys at WP:VG despise you. "Learn to read?" Real friendly. Since GameSpy is down, I get a redirect to its farewell message. Maybe you can explain what "In 2003, inXile, founded by Wasteland's producer, Brian Fargo, acquired the rights to Wasteland from Konami, which held it in relation to the Yu-Gi-Oh! franchise" actually means. --Soetermans. T / C 19:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Because Konami copyrighted "Wasteland" in relation to Yu-Gi-Oh! indeed. Also if you see a dead link, learn to post dead link. Also also, besides Internet Archive, you havel also little something called Google. -- Niemti ( talk) 04:22, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
So either stop, find the information yourself or go to the talk page and explain why you feel tags need to be added to a developing article. It really is a pointless issue to be edit warring over. I am sure I dont need to explain the consequences of edit warring to an experienced editor such as yourself. As for your suggestion that I suggest the tags be deleted, that in it self is pointless as it has already been discussed in the past and 3 times it was deemed that the page should be deleted. Besides, I am all for tags, when they are needed. Which in an article such as this, they are not. Especially when saying a cast list is incomplete when it quite clearly is as we only name notables who join the cast and not every Tom, Dick and Harry. -- MisterShiney ✉ 10:02, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
If you don't like the tags so much, go and work on the article, then remove the tags once you're done and the sections are complete enough. Simple enough? -- Niemti ( talk) 10:08, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey, why did you remove my contribution to this article? It is true that there is also a pirated version of this game as you can see it on YouTube. Bao-Dur ( talk) 11:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Unreferenced random trivia in a GA. -- Niemti ( talk) 15:11, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
No need to promote links to some individual reviews. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.91.169.7 ( talk) 02:39, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
If edit psylocke 1 more time you're not going to be on Wikipedia anymore — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.137.88.138 ( talk) 03:39, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mortal Kombat (2011 video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skarlet ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Niemti, you may be interested in seeing the latest edits on the Battle of Ia Drang article. It does appear that another person is calling the action a American victory, rather the consensus that the result was "inconclusive". Regards, David J Johnson ( talk) 17:22, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Niemti, I ask you to change your tone in discussions at Talk:World War Z. Other editors are less inclined to listen. I think you have a point about the article lacking mention of Russia, but you need to convey it better. Otherwise it is going to be overlooked in the combativeness between all of you. Erik ( talk | contribs) 20:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
On a different note, can I just ask why you are perfectly happy to find the content yourself and yet wont take it one step further and make the changes yourself? But will instead put a tag in place (which to be fair is purely opinion as who gets to decide when the section is complete?) which comes across as really lazy. Is it a confidence issue? That you are afraid of making mistakes? If so please re[read WP:SOFIXIT. As is explained, if it is really bad then things can always be reverted back. Editing really is nothing to be afraid of. -- MisterShiney ✉ 00:14, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Well, I'm not certainly. Lately, I have had little time for Wikipedia, but I have not abandoned it. So, I would call it a break. Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 00:43, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
I noticed you reverted by edit on: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=XCOM:_Enemy_Unknown&oldid=561505695&diff=prev
Well its a machine that plays the game, so I thought it would be calling a gaming machine. It looks like this: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BMGlTgqCEAAy-Hm.jpg:large
I guess it could be called an arcade cabinet, as that's what it is being called on the internet. I'll change it that way. ~~ Sintaku Talk 12:08, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Was there any dicsusion to merge these pages? Don't we need consensus before such a major move? -- Ted87 ( talk) 18:32, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
They were tagged with various tags for many years and didn't get any improvement, and usually didn't get even 1 reference of any kind (thus nothing to merge because it's all original research/unsourced content). -- Niemti ( talk) 18:52, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Nevertheless, there should still be a consensus to merge pages. Especially a mass merge like this one. A couple pages did have sources which are tricky to find on character pages since most of the info comes straight from a show. -- Ted87 ( talk) 21:52, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey, didn't you compliment me on the Garrus Vakarian article a while back? If so: cheers for the thanks. It keeps tireless workers such as myself going.
Anyway, you "made" ('twas a redirect beforehand, at least) the Chronicles of Mystara article, right? Don't know if you've found any sources by your own means, but I found a few and added them to the talk page. If you're still interested in the article, hopefully they should help. – Bellum ( talk) ( contribs) 19:49, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Every single other Xbox 360-only Game apart from Tenchu-Z, are also listed in Xbox 360 games. There are 243 games in the Xbox 360-only section, are you going to edit these all as well ? Darwin-rover ( talk) 17:46, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Short answer: yes. -- Niemti ( talk) 17:51, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Hz. tiang 05:20, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
I think you need to explain better on Talk:Poznań 1956 protests what you mean. It's an external links section, so a bulleted list of links is the correct format. If you mean that some of the links should be removed, then please use the {{ external links}} template, or better yet: just remove the ones you think shouldn't be there, as the section is not that long in the first place. Otherwise, I really do not understand what you think needs to be done here. Thanks. — howcheng { chat} 09:47, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
No, itn't: no names and dates and authors, false titles, dead links. -- Niemti ( talk) 19:41, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:35, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Wow, you've got a greatly amount of material about Heather Mason. I'm not a big fan of SH, and I prefer to work on the "articles" I've started to work on my sandbox, however I'm very happy with the content you brought and I'll appreciate to work on it. Cheers, Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 01:18, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Ginsuloft. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Augustus Hill without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Ginsuloft ( talk) 21:38, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
WP:N and welcome to Wikipedia. -- Niemti ( talk) 21:42, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Ginsuloft ( talk) 21:43, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vindictus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:40, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ARMA 2 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:11, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
This is getting quite tedious.
1) CUBE magazine is not a reliable source for story information. The actual section was written solely by the editor, it had no input from the development team. The "Hallucination" version of BH4 had no plot. I asked Mr. Kawamura about this directly and he strictly denied it. No information on the story of any BH4 version was ever provided to anyone outside of CAPCOM, let alone a Western magazine, until after the final version was already released. His version (Hallucination) also had very little to do with Sugimura's version (Castle) which actually did have a complete scenario and was the one which featured the girl and dog. Hallucination dropped them and kept only the basic concept of an infected Leon.
2) Chris and Claire played no role in any version of BH4.
3) Sherry Birkin did not appear in any version of BH4.
4) The Progenitor Virus was originally discovered on Mallet Island (the setting of the BH4 version that became Devil May Cry). It was then changed to Africa, its setting during REmake, 0 and 4 (all written at the same time). You can actually see it mentioned in one of 0's files.
I'm the person who interviewed Mr. Kawamura (and also helped with a second interview), making me a tad more informed than most. It's also worrying that you're prepared to use a source that makes some headline grabbing muck rather than going for the direct source of the interview itself, and this isn't the first time. Project Umbrella ( talk) 23:44, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
Apparently you did not understood my intention about correcting the size of the screenshot of Wolfenstein 3D. Not precising a size cause the image to be scaled down and make the image blurry while specifying the exact size make the image crisp and doesn't use that much space. Of course it would be silly to display a 1600px wide image in a Wikipedia article, but showing a 300px wide image instead of 220px (that's the size of the thumbnail) doesn't seems to be a problem. I'll be glad to know your reasons for reverting the minor change.
Best regards,
Lunavorax ( talk) 01:32, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Seriously, what. Thumb's like 200px always, be it a HD game or not. -- Niemti ( talk) 09:19, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:59, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I know that we have collaborated on the Jinx article before, but I don't understand why you insist on the quote box in the live action film section. Putting the quote in a box at the beginning of the section is unnecessary, as it sandwiches the text between that and the infobox, plus the quote refers to elements of the plot, before the reader has had a chance to read that paragraph! Moving the quote to the end doesn't take anything away from the article, and actually allows it to flow better. Please understand, I'm not disputing the content that you've added, just the way that is is displayed, and I appreciate your cooperation. Fortdj33 ( talk) 13:39, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
There was a discussion probably within the last year give or take at WT:VG about the use of articles that called out to video game characters in terms of their sex appeal or similar type of qualities, which you were involved with because you were adding these across the board. That discussion basically said that if all such articles are are a list without little explanation of why the characters are included beyond stuff "she has a nice figure", its not worth including. That Soletron article is exactly the type that simply lists out the characters and does not explain any more than a sentence about their inclusion. They certainly do not help summarize the topic in this case since this is the first time I've ever seen that character in Heavy Rain called out as sexy, so one, barely reliable source's opinion , as little as there is, is not appropriate to include at all.
Further, I remind you that WP:BRD needs to be followed. You should be very well aware there is a large chunk of the Video Games project that are disassitisified with your forcefulness in including material, even if you are otherwise including good edits along the way. Breaking BRD or forcing points will not be seen favorably if they try to take you to ANI. (I'm not doing so just on this edit, but this is the type of evidence they'll use to justify their case). If people revert your additions, find out why, don't assume that you're right. That will get your blocked. -- MASEM ( t) 13:46, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
It's not first, maybe you need to read more, like I need to get get out more. And the list is perfectly fine. -- Niemti ( talk) 13:50, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Fortdj33 ( talk) 15:05, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lunar 2: Eternal Blue Complete may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:51, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mr. Wint and Mr. Kidd may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:03, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
you are accused of Vandalism. First warning. Blade-of-the-South ( talk) 23:42, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
lol. -- Niemti ( talk) 06:55, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:11, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I specifically referred to "references and quotes", it's "bolding", such usage of commas is improper, and I'm not sure I like the tone of "welcome to Wikipedia". Omitting the serial comma is also improper. Please stop reintroducing errors. Despatche ( talk) 12:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
-- Niemti ( talk) 12:32, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Stop spamming the article with irrelevant info and pics;
None of the info you post has anything to do with the Resistenza; so just read a book on it for starters and stop deleting well referenced and relevant info for the given topic. The rearrangement and adding of pics. and info pics. (like a flag) is also noteworthy and important. Why dont you post your irrelevant and completely beside the point info into a sandbox first;
Daufer (
talk)
18:27, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Italian resistance movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN talk to me 19:56, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
It's an obvious troll who vandalizes several articles that I've been recently working on. Go see his edit history, for example: [14] [15] -- Niemti ( talk) 19:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
I made my case as to why the Meryl Silverburgh should cover the Policenauts incarnation on Talk:Meryl Silverburgh in case you're interested. Jonny2x4 ( talk) 08:54, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Hounding of Niemti by Daufer. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 01:28, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cobalt bomb may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, would you mind clarifying why you tagged ARMA 2's lead section as too short? I personally can't think of anything that could be added to it, it clarifies what the game is and where it comes from...-- Newbiepedian ( Hailing Frequencies) 14:27, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Nothing about: gameplay, plot, development, reception, mods. -- Niemti ( talk) 04:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Edit summaries are not the place to figure out if a published, and apparently well-known, author is a reliable source. If you think he is not a reliable source then bring up on the talk page or better yet at WP:RSN. I know nothing of this person nor do I care about him or the articles he's being excised from but what I do know is that whenever people start removing things from Wikipedia claiming that such'n'such a person is a "proven liar" and a "fraud" that usually means the person is pushing an agenda and is not being neutral.
Not to mention that instead of reverting me again the preferred method to resolve the issue is to discuss it on the talk page. I did a couple of minutes of searching and it appears that the Giduck owns the company that has published his books so there's plenty of red flags there that makes using him as a source in Wikipedia potentially problematical but you need to actually make those arguments instead of edit warring. SQGibbon ( talk) 17:56, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Curse of Enchantia box artwork.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 21:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Oddjob 007.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 17:05, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Stop cutting out the relevant info and original research from good articles. This was the first and final warning. -- Slider2k ( talk) 09:41, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
lololol -- Niemti ( talk) 10:28, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
FYI, Sjones notified me of the IP who attacked you on your talk page, and was block evading, and he has been blocked. I'm notifying you since you made the effort to notify Dennis Brown, which probably means you wanted something to be done. Sergecross73 msg me 02:08, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Per previous comments left by others, 1 2 could you please leave edit summaries. They are a great help to others and are an adopted convention, especially when making potentially controversial edits such as the removal of images. Please also refer to Talk:Flashback (video game)#Flashback Origins. Thanks. -- Trevj ( talk) 06:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:40, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
I see from your Block log [1] that you've been blocked twice. If you want to get blocked again, and for a good deal longer time, you're going about it the right way. Your comment [2] at WP:RSN is completely out of bounds and a personal attack. I see that you posted the identical attack [3] at the WP:RFC examining your editing behavior generally. It is one thing to disagree with another editor on a point of interpretation of policy; it is quite another to call the editor a liar for doing so. Please refactor these attacks; if not, it will be reported to the appropriate forum for administrator action. Fladrif ( talk) 13:43, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
And I think stalking me continously for nearly a year now and constantly trying to recruit people into his obsessive crusade is "completely out of bounds and a personal attack" (also: it's hardly the first time I've caught him telling such blatant untruths in relation to me, and I'm even actively trying not to read anything he writes - what I'm doing is a complete opposite of his neveredning harrassment, as I'm staying away and trying to ignore him as much as it's possible, and he only rarely manages to troll me into reacting like that). -- Niemti ( talk) 13:50, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Niemti, I've tried to stay out of discussions involving you, but I'm now going to step in in my capacity as an Admin. You do a lot of good work around Wikipedia- despite your odd insistence on only doing the bare minimum necessary, you have gotten a lot of articles to GA. Even with those positives, however, your general attitude and demeanor are beginning to overwhelm your contributions. In seemingly the majority of discussions you are involved in, you belittle and insult anyone who disagrees with your positions, regardless of policy. You have a consistent history of ignoring any consensus or rebuke that you don't want to pay attention to. You regularly find yourself in edit wars, seemingly in an attempt to shut down opposition by force rather than discussion. Disputes that you are involved in are now a weekly fixture at the WP:VG talk page- and large groups of committed, hard-working editors now refuse to involve themselves in anything you are a part of, a group that included me until today. There is an active movement to get you topic-banned from all video game-related articles, something which has never happened before as afar as I know in the nearly 7 years I've been here. I don't think the issue is video game articles, however- I think the issue is your attitude.
Wikipedia is a collaborative project. While every editor doesn't have to work directly with other editors, they can't work against them or actively disrupt the group as a whole or the project ceases to function. You've demonstrated that you are unwilling or unable to work collaboratively and non-disruptively, and that outweighs any article contributions you make.
As such, I am giving you this warning: stop acting combatively, aggressively, and dismissively, and stop disrupting the project. If you continue, I'm going to start blocking you at each offense- 2 weeks to start with, with every successive block doubling in length. I hope that this will encourage you to act in a non-disruptive manner, and allow you to continue to enjoy writing articles, but I expect that it will in any case stop the disruption. -- Pres N 18:50, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
(unindent) Right. Well, either you have read and understood what I've warned you about, or you're unable to- trying to deflect the problem to be Sjones following you or not knowing Sergecross is an admin too or that Izno was actually disrupting you does not actually make me forget what we were actually talking about or show any willingness on your part to change. You've been warned, you know what the consequences will be if you continue, other people know about it, so I'll back out of this increasingly obtuse discussion and wait and see. -- Pres N 20:26, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
(Reinstated the warning I gave earlier for context) - 3 days ago I told you that I would block you if you started picking fights and acting aggressively again- your consistent, repeated lack of civility had pushed you over the line to be blocked before, but I didn't feel right blocking you without warning you first. Today, you called SJones23 a stalker 4 times ( [7], [8], [9], [10]) and started an argument at Talk:Jill Valentine/GA2 with FutureTrillionaire, Wizardman, and J Milburn that then spilled over into WT:GAN wherein you were, as usual, dismissive of the opinions of others, condescending ("I hope you learned something new today, and welcome to Wikipedia."), and completely unable to be reasoned with. (For future reference: poor sources may not be in the "quickfail" criteria, but the reviewer was within their rights to just regular-fail the article for that reason. You could have fixed the article with half the effort you put into "being right" on the talk page.) Is this latest example of rudeness worthy of being blocked on it's own? Maybe. But when it's added to the massive heap of incivility over the past weeks/months/years that got your original account banned, it's the trigger that I warned you about 3 days ago.
Blocked for two weeks. Next time is a month; I'll continue to double times if necessary. -- Pres N 01:49, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
That he's stalking me constantly without a pause nor end in sight is a long estabilished fact, and yet he only occasionally manages to troll me into getting a rise like that. I wish if there was just a mode "users to ignore". -- Niemti ( talk) 08:46, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Also actually it's totally cool and I ain't even mad, I needed a break anyway. But the "ignore" option might be something Wikipedia would use of. -- Niemti ( talk) 08:59, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi Niemti. I think you must be very careful when your wiki- health supply is close to zero. If you want to last longer, you probably should edit less videogames and make less GA nominations. Why bring anything to GA level if there are so many stubs and even subjects not covered by any articles? And speaking about videogames, do not you think that we have way too much of this stuff already? I realize that other subjects could be more controversial, but as long as they are not high profile or at least not edited by many people (you should check edit history and talk page), you are going to be safe.
Are you OK with me reviewing this? I don't know how you felt after that Darkwatch review, but I have another GA nom up there and, in keeping with my practice, I review (at least) one for any one I nominate. I also try to review the one that's gone unreviewed the longest, and at this time it's this one.
I gave it a quick once-over and it looks alright, although obviously I want to do an in-depth review. Since you're blocked, I would be happy to transclude the review subpage here (assuming the blocking admin's OK with it; I can't imagine he wouldn't be). Post your answer here; I'll check back. Daniel Case ( talk) 19:06, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
How about just see you in 2 weeks or so? Because I'm not even going to log in really unil then. Darkwatch was cool and speaking of KOF I've got the original The King of Fighters '94 done previously. -- Niemti ( talk) 10:31, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry I disappeared from the review process. I'm in school, and finals came around and did a number on me. I'll be updating the page over the next couple of days to implement some of the things we talked about myself. TI. Gracchus ( talk) 18:46, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
You have previously commented on Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Niemti.
As an outside editor, I have moved that this RFC/U be closed. If you wish to comment on the Motion to close, please do so here. Fladrif ( talk) 14:40, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at WP:AN regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is " RfC proposal for community sanctions against Niemti". Thank you. Please make any statement that you may wish to make in the section below. It will be transcluded to the AN discussion. Sandstein 12:15, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Oh hi. Long story short so I won't be "ranting" (or what not) this time:
-- Niemti ( talk) 12:13, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
After skipping through through the thread, some comments on comments:
-- Niemti ( talk) 14:04, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
In response to your comment, in fact I hadn't noticed your work at
Morgan le Fay, which I haven't done much work on in several years, and we certainly haven't interacted there. At any rate it's just misdirection; as far as I remember, other than the
Anita Sarkeesian debacle I've never dealt with you at any of the articles or forums that concern us here. However, the briefest of looks into your other contributions shows that you've displayed the same serious issues that got you banned from that topic in many other areas. Your intransigence in forcing through your low standards and personal interpretations of the Good Article procedures, rather than collaborating with others to create actual, well, good articles, is one of those problems.--
Cúchullain
t/
c
21:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Niemti, what in the world happened when I was on wikibreak? Honestly, I left Wikipedia for awhile because of one user rather then make a huge fight about peanuts. Hopefully, you will have come to see things a bit different after your 'break'. You are a good editor and contributed a great amount of content to the video game section of Wikipedia. My advice would be to update things that no one currently watches like a hawk and if it is popular, make sure its not connected to any people you currently have issues with. Wikipedia is huge and getting bigger everyday. I'll be on more, so drop me a message when you can. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 03:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps you did not notice, but some admins on AN express willingness to block you again at the first sign of incivility, edit war or whatever. Here is a couple of ways to avoid it. First, if someone reverted your edit (even about tag), you must start discussion at article talk page, wait for their response and do not revert them back, even if they are wrong, unless you came to an agreement. And if you did not come to agreement, you still should not revert them back. Otherwise, you will be blocked. Second, in case of any content disagreements, you should always use only article talk page, not another user page. My very best wishes ( talk) 18:57, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Per this ANI discussion: AN discussion
The community has determined that you are now topic banned from GA articles, with the specific ban phrased as:
This is effective immediately and had no expiration, though you may appeal to Arbcom or to the Community in due course (after the passage of at least six months is customary, or more typically a year).
Additionally, I would like to note to you that there was approaching a consensus to indefinitely community ban you from editing entirely, though it in the end only had about 60% support. Though I understand this is a complex situation with many participants, some of whom clearly support your participation, it is clear that a large number of users feel that your participation was a net negative for the encyclopedia. Editors who approach these levels of community support for a complete editing ban usually get banned if they continue the behaviors that got the ban proposal going in the first place.
I would like to urge that you review how you are participating on Wikipedia, take the criticisms leveled by your critics seriously, and work to avoid such levels of conflict in the future. You've been around for a long time with the prior main and this account. You know how to step back and find a new balance point. For your sake, please take the time to do so.
Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert ( talk) 22:08, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Just wondering if you could shine some light on the couple of questions I've posted on the talk page? Cheers. Samwalton9 ( talk) 22:42, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blockbuster ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I was just wondering if I missed something when you reverted my edits on Makoto (Street Fighter) that removed that one category on her being a fictional martial artist. I just checked the category myself, so is it because it's a container category? I was unaware, so sorry about that. TheStickMan [✆Talk] 13:54, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Yes, she's a karateka. -- Niemti ( talk) 19:12, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Would it be possible to place an summary on your edits so that other editors may understand why you are making a change? Thanks. Student7 ( talk) 14:38, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Psylocke MvC2.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:26, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Metal Gear Solid (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page E3 ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I hope you do not mind me adding List of films featuring diabetes to the "See also" section in Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters. I cited the film at the list article, but there has been some debate about the list itself and what belongs on the list. I think that this film's inclusion is fairly clear-cut and that cross-linking is appropriate here. Let me know if you disagree. Thanks, Erik ( talk | contribs) 15:55, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Sure, why not? -- Niemti ( talk) 20:38, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. I don't intend to expand so much Wesker's article. I see that source in Dr. Wily's article, and so I thought it could be useful put it in the article. About the OPSM it's a good source, and I found some interesting articles (like this and this) that can help me to create a article for Dr. Nefarious (currently it's a redirect). Just for curiosity: you're Brazilian? Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 01:07, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
I only added Transformers to that category if they appeared in video games. I was curious as to why you thick they DO NOT belong in the category "Robot character in video games". DO you think they are not robots? OR that they did not appear in video games? Mathewignash ( talk)
Maybe you should sometimes read the descriptions in the categories. -- Niemti ( talk) 21:21, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Shouldn't the name of the category be something like "Robot characters originating in video games"? Also, even with that stipulation, there are some Transformers characters whose first appearance is a video game. I started discussion about it on the video game wiki project, please come there and give your opinions there. Mathewignash ( talk) 12:58, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
No, all of these categories are named this way. -- Niemti ( talk) 16:21, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
Why this edit to David (A.I. character)? Jason Quinn ( talk) 12:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know that I think you're doing a really good job staying calm and civil in the discussions going around about the categories for video game characters- you're disagreeing with other editors (though I think you're correct) but you're doing so without getting angry and uncivil. As long as you keep that up, I'm glad you didn't get banned. -- Pres N 18:13, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
You realize you can talk to me if there is something you think I do not understand. For example, if you think that the formatting of an article should be one way, you could cite an article for example, or you could explain the policy in a polite way. To just revert what I had carefully done with no explanation is not a friendly gesture, especially when I am the one who is shepherding this article through the Good Article nomination process right now. Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 23:52, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for commenting on the category name change proposal. I hope you understand that it just seems illogical to have a category called "Robot characters in video games" and then exclude robot characters who appeared in video games from being listed. I just changed the proposal to simply change it to "Category:Video game robots", which I think would solve the problem, since the emphasis would become "video game" characters who are "robots"... Mathewignash ( talk) 11:57, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
If it's gong to make you happy. -- Niemti ( talk) 11:59, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
This message is being sent to you let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You do not need to participate however, you are invited to help find a resolution. The thread is " Ghost in the Shell, Talk:Ghost in the Shell". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 15:27, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Instead of deleting, you should've just correct "Chechen language" to "Cyrillic script". -- bender235 ( talk) 06:51, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
It's English Wikipedia, we don't use "Arabic sript" when mentioning some Arab American. -- Niemti ( talk) 08:23, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
"I have blocked the IP address for severe incivility including anyone operating from it for 24 hours. I shall not block for longer in case it is a public computer system. The underlying accusation of sockpupeteering is more serious, however and will have to be looked at in greater depth."
SERIOUSLY? Also, such a great secret, no one ever knew. -- Niemti ( talk) 12:02, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Also, it wasn't quite the intervention that I was looking for. But I guess the stupid "accusation of sockpupeteering" is more important than what ammounts to character assassination on the entire group of people when the world is interested in the issue. Just take a look at this list:
A few controversial people, all of whom are responsible for the violence in the last 2 decades (not even evaluating them otherwise), plus 1 random sportsman (just one of many notable Chechen martial artists) (and previously, even a non-Chechen Arab militant) - an entirety of "notable Chechens". Yeah. What a nation, right? -- Niemti ( talk) 12:17, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
SNAAAAKE!! ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
"Severe incivility" was just me writing "I'm bringing it the fucking ANI" to break an edit war ( which I did), regarding the above. Also, as someone comes to check it, you can also forward the above to this very thread (I think it's extremely important for this very biased list to not be posted to this article, now when there's a sudden global attention - you can forward it too). Niemti ( talk) 12:33, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There is currently no direct block on this account ( ✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 12:36, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have unblocked your IP (your account was never blocked) to allow you to comment on socking enquiry.--Fil e Éireann 12:54, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
just saw some sort of block thing in my watchlist ... good grief ... what the hell didja do now? — Ched : ? 13:43, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Wrote "I'm bringing it the fucking ANI" while unlogged before logging in to do just this. -- Niemti ( talk) 13:46, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Niemti. Can you give a look here? I'm working in some video game characters (as well anime characters) I missed in Wikipedia, and once I know you help to maintain virtually all video game characters (it's easy to proove this seeing the history of them) I came here to ask your opinion and some suggestions, and even your contribution with those "sub-articles". Notice that now I'm focus reception section despite some of them have more than it. What can you say about it? My antecipated thanks. Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 07:41, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mongol invasions of Chechnya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avars ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:04, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ghost in the Shell S.A.C. 2nd GIG Motoko Kusanagi.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. TomStar81 ( Talk) 04:10, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to File:Ghost in the Shell S.A.C. 2nd GIG Motoko Kusanagi.png. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 05:24, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Goro MK comic.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:XCOM logo 2012.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:16, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
There was a Garibaldi Brigade in the Spanish Civil War, previously the Garibaldi Battalion. As there is an article on that, I've changed the redirect to go there. The XII International took over from the Brigade, which then formed a battalion in it. I've also moved it to Garibaldi Brigade without the s. If an article gets written about similarly named outfits operating in Italy itself, the redirect can be usurped, and a hatnote added for the XII. Until then, I feel it's performing a function. I'm not an expert but a jack of all trades (except American football...), and am always willing to have a discussion over something I've jumped into. Peridon ( talk) 13:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Garibaldi Brigades (note the prular form): http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigate_Garibaldi -- Niemti ( talk) 14:14, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Your name came up in a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Before ANI. -- Lexein ( talk) 09:11, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Milana Terloeva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chechen Wars ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 15:18, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. - Knowledgekid87 ( talk) 23:19, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I "apparently" didn't. -- Niemti ( talk) 08:06, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Category:Fictional sorceresses, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker ( talk) 20:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
I've noticed you've been reverting edits related to the removal of information regarding "BIOHAZARD DASH" originally being BIOHAZARD 2. First off, this is completely incorrect. DASH was an idea fielded by Yoshiki Okamoto, general manager of development at CAPCOM at the time, while BIO2 was already in development. The reason Okamoto's idea was never followed up on was because they wanted to focus on the game they were already making. It was never in development. Secondly, the purported source (PlayStation Universe) is almost entirely speculation and hearsay the author hadn't researched. It doesn't cite the source for DASH (a single interview with Okamoto in Genki PlayStation). The basic ideas for DASH were carried over to the Sega Saturn port of the original BIO HAZARD game. This led to confusion within the UK press at the time that led to the Saturn port being labeled "BIOHAZARD DASH" for a while.
DASH was never an "attempt" at creating anything. It was solely a briefly fielded idea (one of many) that was shot down before it became anything more than a concept. No work was done on it, and it has no relation to BIOHAZARD 1.5 or BIOHAZARD 2. Project Umbrella ( talk) 19:59, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
But at least thanks to you I just learned about Sengoku Biohazard (but this article is still so bad). -- Niemti ( talk) 17:33, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.-- Canoe1967 ( talk) 17:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Ada is mentioned on a first-name basis in BH1. My edit was about John Clemens' second name not being in the final version, but being in the demo version. Since you brought it up though, yes, Ada was mentioned by name in the file even in the demo (along with the original eleven Trevor's Notes that were also removed from the final version, and at that stage, "B.O.W." was also originally "B.H.W." - Biohazard Weapon). These changes were enacted by Yasuyuki Saga after the departure of scenario writer Kenichi Iwao in late '95. Her personality and occupation were not planned in the first game, aside from the fact that she was John Clemens' girlfriend. At the beginning of development for the second game (the stage known as "1.5"), an Umbrella researcher named Linda was created. However, she was renamed Ada Wong in order to draw a connection to the first game, with her Chinese surname added since no surname was written for her in the first game and her character design was half-Chinese. The character and her name were kept after 1.5 was scrapped, although her occupation and personality were completely altered. In the final version, she was a spy for Umbrella's rival company who infiltrated the Arklay Laboratory posing as a researcher and became Clemens' girlfriend in order to gain information. There was no retcon involved at any stage since the only changes occurred during production before the plot was complete. The addition of her previously non-existent surname in the second game is not a retcon. Project Umbrella ( talk) 15:44, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
And if you want to be actually useful, Chris Redfield needs a lot of work ( Albert Wesker too). Resident Evil (video game) is also only so-so for the game's caliber (just compare with Resident Evil 2 or Resident Evil 4). -- Niemti ( talk) 17:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Could you explain undo my changes in Spetsnaz article? -- Rezonansowy ( talk) 17:38, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Spetsnaz GRU this way. -- Niemti ( talk) 19:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for changing Rikimaru's pic to official artwork and removing the fan art that had been there for years. Razdower ( talk) 16:54, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
A focused and clean discussion of the future of the article is underway, because you made comments on Ghost in the Shell I am notifying you for your input in the debate. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 03:53, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kelly Hu may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:59, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --- The Old Jacobite The '45 16:00, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
You need to relax and remain civil at all times Niemti, I have tried my best to assist in your disputes, but when you respond in a hostile or abrasive way it makes me wonder why I even bother. Wikipedia is not perfect and idealism is one thing, but you shouldn't burn bridges or wage edit wars that will only serve to get you blocked. Even good changes will be reverted if you get blocked. Take your issues to DRN before you edit war, that way if a bunch of editors agree it will not be YOU who gets blocked for edit warring. Besides, by doing it that way other editors will start to think of you in a better light. Besides, I doubt you like fighting over these matters, trust other editors to see it your way and bring it to WP:DRN next time. Because if you edit war again, I will not come to your defense, but I will be at DRN when and if you chose to heed my advice. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 12:13, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
I don't think the problem is any "dispute" to be resolved, I believe the problem is rather how to reinstate all these countless whimsically reverted good edits everywhere in the film/series articles. That's the problem. -- Niemti ( talk) 16:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I agree this article probably isn't salvageable, but it's somewhat poor form to neither mention the AfD in the edit summary that added it, nor leave a message on the talk page of article's creator. -- McGeddon ( talk) 13:00, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Ah, I forgot. -- Niemti ( talk) 13:50, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ivy Valentine may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:21, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shinobido: Way of the Ninja may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 18:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
...you didn't question the reliability of a source written by someone called "Cherry Liquor"? o_O-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 03:50, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cockneys vs Zombies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles II ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:35, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
We use WP:NPOV not WP:ILIKEIT as a standard. Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 20:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Category:Fictional American people of Dutch descent in video games, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Robofish ( talk) 20:43, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Matty.007. Niemti, thanks for creating Annica Smedius!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Just needs references, then is good to go
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Matty.007 13:44, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Ibuki SFXT.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 08:23, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Annica Smedius, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TV4 ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:38, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
How come here you removed the picture of Sunstar the unicorn? She's an important char, I think it is cool to have pictures of major chars, maybe you could add others too? Ranze ( talk) 06:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:World War Z film poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 05:18, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:52, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
So, this "kangkung" thing was indeed a vandalism? At first I was quite, well, confused when I noticed that you reverted my edit but then I saw that you replaced this "kangkung" thing with Kung Lao. Glad that you solved the problem. -- Jovaen ( talk) 15:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
No wonder those guys at WP:VG despise you. "Learn to read?" Real friendly. Since GameSpy is down, I get a redirect to its farewell message. Maybe you can explain what "In 2003, inXile, founded by Wasteland's producer, Brian Fargo, acquired the rights to Wasteland from Konami, which held it in relation to the Yu-Gi-Oh! franchise" actually means. --Soetermans. T / C 19:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Because Konami copyrighted "Wasteland" in relation to Yu-Gi-Oh! indeed. Also if you see a dead link, learn to post dead link. Also also, besides Internet Archive, you havel also little something called Google. -- Niemti ( talk) 04:22, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
So either stop, find the information yourself or go to the talk page and explain why you feel tags need to be added to a developing article. It really is a pointless issue to be edit warring over. I am sure I dont need to explain the consequences of edit warring to an experienced editor such as yourself. As for your suggestion that I suggest the tags be deleted, that in it self is pointless as it has already been discussed in the past and 3 times it was deemed that the page should be deleted. Besides, I am all for tags, when they are needed. Which in an article such as this, they are not. Especially when saying a cast list is incomplete when it quite clearly is as we only name notables who join the cast and not every Tom, Dick and Harry. -- MisterShiney ✉ 10:02, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
If you don't like the tags so much, go and work on the article, then remove the tags once you're done and the sections are complete enough. Simple enough? -- Niemti ( talk) 10:08, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey, why did you remove my contribution to this article? It is true that there is also a pirated version of this game as you can see it on YouTube. Bao-Dur ( talk) 11:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Unreferenced random trivia in a GA. -- Niemti ( talk) 15:11, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
No need to promote links to some individual reviews. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.91.169.7 ( talk) 02:39, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
If edit psylocke 1 more time you're not going to be on Wikipedia anymore — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.137.88.138 ( talk) 03:39, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mortal Kombat (2011 video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skarlet ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello Niemti, you may be interested in seeing the latest edits on the Battle of Ia Drang article. It does appear that another person is calling the action a American victory, rather the consensus that the result was "inconclusive". Regards, David J Johnson ( talk) 17:22, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Niemti, I ask you to change your tone in discussions at Talk:World War Z. Other editors are less inclined to listen. I think you have a point about the article lacking mention of Russia, but you need to convey it better. Otherwise it is going to be overlooked in the combativeness between all of you. Erik ( talk | contribs) 20:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
On a different note, can I just ask why you are perfectly happy to find the content yourself and yet wont take it one step further and make the changes yourself? But will instead put a tag in place (which to be fair is purely opinion as who gets to decide when the section is complete?) which comes across as really lazy. Is it a confidence issue? That you are afraid of making mistakes? If so please re[read WP:SOFIXIT. As is explained, if it is really bad then things can always be reverted back. Editing really is nothing to be afraid of. -- MisterShiney ✉ 00:14, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Well, I'm not certainly. Lately, I have had little time for Wikipedia, but I have not abandoned it. So, I would call it a break. Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 00:43, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
I noticed you reverted by edit on: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=XCOM:_Enemy_Unknown&oldid=561505695&diff=prev
Well its a machine that plays the game, so I thought it would be calling a gaming machine. It looks like this: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BMGlTgqCEAAy-Hm.jpg:large
I guess it could be called an arcade cabinet, as that's what it is being called on the internet. I'll change it that way. ~~ Sintaku Talk 12:08, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Was there any dicsusion to merge these pages? Don't we need consensus before such a major move? -- Ted87 ( talk) 18:32, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
They were tagged with various tags for many years and didn't get any improvement, and usually didn't get even 1 reference of any kind (thus nothing to merge because it's all original research/unsourced content). -- Niemti ( talk) 18:52, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Nevertheless, there should still be a consensus to merge pages. Especially a mass merge like this one. A couple pages did have sources which are tricky to find on character pages since most of the info comes straight from a show. -- Ted87 ( talk) 21:52, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey, didn't you compliment me on the Garrus Vakarian article a while back? If so: cheers for the thanks. It keeps tireless workers such as myself going.
Anyway, you "made" ('twas a redirect beforehand, at least) the Chronicles of Mystara article, right? Don't know if you've found any sources by your own means, but I found a few and added them to the talk page. If you're still interested in the article, hopefully they should help. – Bellum ( talk) ( contribs) 19:49, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Every single other Xbox 360-only Game apart from Tenchu-Z, are also listed in Xbox 360 games. There are 243 games in the Xbox 360-only section, are you going to edit these all as well ? Darwin-rover ( talk) 17:46, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Short answer: yes. -- Niemti ( talk) 17:51, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Hz. tiang 05:20, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
I think you need to explain better on Talk:Poznań 1956 protests what you mean. It's an external links section, so a bulleted list of links is the correct format. If you mean that some of the links should be removed, then please use the {{ external links}} template, or better yet: just remove the ones you think shouldn't be there, as the section is not that long in the first place. Otherwise, I really do not understand what you think needs to be done here. Thanks. — howcheng { chat} 09:47, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
No, itn't: no names and dates and authors, false titles, dead links. -- Niemti ( talk) 19:41, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:35, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Wow, you've got a greatly amount of material about Heather Mason. I'm not a big fan of SH, and I prefer to work on the "articles" I've started to work on my sandbox, however I'm very happy with the content you brought and I'll appreciate to work on it. Cheers, Gabriel Yuji ( talk) 01:18, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Ginsuloft. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Augustus Hill without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — Ginsuloft ( talk) 21:38, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
WP:N and welcome to Wikipedia. -- Niemti ( talk) 21:42, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Ginsuloft ( talk) 21:43, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vindictus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:40, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ARMA 2 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:11, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
This is getting quite tedious.
1) CUBE magazine is not a reliable source for story information. The actual section was written solely by the editor, it had no input from the development team. The "Hallucination" version of BH4 had no plot. I asked Mr. Kawamura about this directly and he strictly denied it. No information on the story of any BH4 version was ever provided to anyone outside of CAPCOM, let alone a Western magazine, until after the final version was already released. His version (Hallucination) also had very little to do with Sugimura's version (Castle) which actually did have a complete scenario and was the one which featured the girl and dog. Hallucination dropped them and kept only the basic concept of an infected Leon.
2) Chris and Claire played no role in any version of BH4.
3) Sherry Birkin did not appear in any version of BH4.
4) The Progenitor Virus was originally discovered on Mallet Island (the setting of the BH4 version that became Devil May Cry). It was then changed to Africa, its setting during REmake, 0 and 4 (all written at the same time). You can actually see it mentioned in one of 0's files.
I'm the person who interviewed Mr. Kawamura (and also helped with a second interview), making me a tad more informed than most. It's also worrying that you're prepared to use a source that makes some headline grabbing muck rather than going for the direct source of the interview itself, and this isn't the first time. Project Umbrella ( talk) 23:44, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
Apparently you did not understood my intention about correcting the size of the screenshot of Wolfenstein 3D. Not precising a size cause the image to be scaled down and make the image blurry while specifying the exact size make the image crisp and doesn't use that much space. Of course it would be silly to display a 1600px wide image in a Wikipedia article, but showing a 300px wide image instead of 220px (that's the size of the thumbnail) doesn't seems to be a problem. I'll be glad to know your reasons for reverting the minor change.
Best regards,
Lunavorax ( talk) 01:32, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Seriously, what. Thumb's like 200px always, be it a HD game or not. -- Niemti ( talk) 09:19, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:59, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. I know that we have collaborated on the Jinx article before, but I don't understand why you insist on the quote box in the live action film section. Putting the quote in a box at the beginning of the section is unnecessary, as it sandwiches the text between that and the infobox, plus the quote refers to elements of the plot, before the reader has had a chance to read that paragraph! Moving the quote to the end doesn't take anything away from the article, and actually allows it to flow better. Please understand, I'm not disputing the content that you've added, just the way that is is displayed, and I appreciate your cooperation. Fortdj33 ( talk) 13:39, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
There was a discussion probably within the last year give or take at WT:VG about the use of articles that called out to video game characters in terms of their sex appeal or similar type of qualities, which you were involved with because you were adding these across the board. That discussion basically said that if all such articles are are a list without little explanation of why the characters are included beyond stuff "she has a nice figure", its not worth including. That Soletron article is exactly the type that simply lists out the characters and does not explain any more than a sentence about their inclusion. They certainly do not help summarize the topic in this case since this is the first time I've ever seen that character in Heavy Rain called out as sexy, so one, barely reliable source's opinion , as little as there is, is not appropriate to include at all.
Further, I remind you that WP:BRD needs to be followed. You should be very well aware there is a large chunk of the Video Games project that are disassitisified with your forcefulness in including material, even if you are otherwise including good edits along the way. Breaking BRD or forcing points will not be seen favorably if they try to take you to ANI. (I'm not doing so just on this edit, but this is the type of evidence they'll use to justify their case). If people revert your additions, find out why, don't assume that you're right. That will get your blocked. -- MASEM ( t) 13:46, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
It's not first, maybe you need to read more, like I need to get get out more. And the list is perfectly fine. -- Niemti ( talk) 13:50, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Fortdj33 ( talk) 15:05, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lunar 2: Eternal Blue Complete may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:51, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mr. Wint and Mr. Kidd may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:03, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
you are accused of Vandalism. First warning. Blade-of-the-South ( talk) 23:42, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
lol. -- Niemti ( talk) 06:55, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:11, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I specifically referred to "references and quotes", it's "bolding", such usage of commas is improper, and I'm not sure I like the tone of "welcome to Wikipedia". Omitting the serial comma is also improper. Please stop reintroducing errors. Despatche ( talk) 12:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
-- Niemti ( talk) 12:32, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
Stop spamming the article with irrelevant info and pics;
None of the info you post has anything to do with the Resistenza; so just read a book on it for starters and stop deleting well referenced and relevant info for the given topic. The rearrangement and adding of pics. and info pics. (like a flag) is also noteworthy and important. Why dont you post your irrelevant and completely beside the point info into a sandbox first;
Daufer (
talk)
18:27, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Italian resistance movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN talk to me 19:56, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
It's an obvious troll who vandalizes several articles that I've been recently working on. Go see his edit history, for example: [14] [15] -- Niemti ( talk) 19:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
I made my case as to why the Meryl Silverburgh should cover the Policenauts incarnation on Talk:Meryl Silverburgh in case you're interested. Jonny2x4 ( talk) 08:54, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Hounding of Niemti by Daufer. Thank you. NeilN talk to me 01:28, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cobalt bomb may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, would you mind clarifying why you tagged ARMA 2's lead section as too short? I personally can't think of anything that could be added to it, it clarifies what the game is and where it comes from...-- Newbiepedian ( Hailing Frequencies) 14:27, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Nothing about: gameplay, plot, development, reception, mods. -- Niemti ( talk) 04:38, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Edit summaries are not the place to figure out if a published, and apparently well-known, author is a reliable source. If you think he is not a reliable source then bring up on the talk page or better yet at WP:RSN. I know nothing of this person nor do I care about him or the articles he's being excised from but what I do know is that whenever people start removing things from Wikipedia claiming that such'n'such a person is a "proven liar" and a "fraud" that usually means the person is pushing an agenda and is not being neutral.
Not to mention that instead of reverting me again the preferred method to resolve the issue is to discuss it on the talk page. I did a couple of minutes of searching and it appears that the Giduck owns the company that has published his books so there's plenty of red flags there that makes using him as a source in Wikipedia potentially problematical but you need to actually make those arguments instead of edit warring. SQGibbon ( talk) 17:56, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Curse of Enchantia box artwork.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 21:05, 31 July 2013 (UTC)