![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 13 |
There is a ticket concerning image you deleted: ticket:2014060710004722. Could you look at it? Ankry ( talk) 08:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Could you please explain why you've just deleted this. It had a valid NFC claim for the Fred Copeman article. Andy Dingley ( talk) 00:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:Fredcopeman.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Andy Dingley ( talk) 01:33, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi TLSuda. A friend contacted me a while ago about the deletion notice on the image that he uploaded. I am the photographer and will re-upload with a proper license. -- BladeBronson ( talk) 20:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Godfather stars.jpg This file from March 11 came up in discussion at MCQ recently. It's been around so long, I had to replace the links showing identical photos. While doing that, I noticed that there are also some undecided files for March 10, 12 and 13th. Did I find an "oops"? :) Thanks, We hope ( talk) 20:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Bots may never sleep but it looks like they take a nap from time to time. :) Thanks for the barnstar!!! We hope ( talk) 21:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Can I please ask why you deleted it, especially when it was uploaded with the consent of the owners with their contact info provided for confirmation?-- Nadirali نادرالی ( talk) 18:56, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
You closed the non-free content review of File:Doctor Balli.jpg with the explanation "Image is being used within policy." Could you please elaborate on how you reached that conclusion? -- Holdek ( talk) 03:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Would you mind if I combined the three NFCR request on ANRFC into a single section? Cheers, Armbrust The Homunculus 14:43, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Why did you remove the {{ di-missing article links}} template without addressing the problem? There is still no separate fair use rationale for each article as the single fair use rationale mentions multiple articles. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 15:43, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Can you please provide a link to the talk page discussion that you believe justified the (highly impactful) move of Yesterday? It is not on Talk:Yesterday, and I don't where to look for it. -- R'n'B ( call me Russ) 17:11, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi TLSuda. I just signed into Wikipedia for the first time in a while, noticed that you had deleted a photo file I had uploaded onto an article I wrote about actor Zack Norman, and saw this message: 00:43, 3 June 2014 TLSuda (talk | contribs) deleted page File:As Ira in Romancing the Stone (1984).jpg (F7: Violates non-free content criterion #1). However, I believe this deletion was made in error, as there is no free equivalent with which the photo can be replaced, and therefore the photo does in fact fall within the first non-free content criterion. I realize the image is owned by 20th Century Fox (it is in fact an official studio publicity still) and shows my subject in character as Ira in their feature Romancing the Stone, but that is precisely the point of including this particular photograph: to show Mr. Norman as he is most easily recognized by the public, which is as this particular character in this particular film. Of course I could replace the image with a photo of Mr. Norman as he looks in everyday life, but that would defeat the purpose. There, I would like to request that you please reconsider and reinstate the file as it was prior to your deletion. Thank you so much! Best regards, Matzohboy ( talk) 01:45, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Can you please close Wikipedia:NFCR#File:Disney_Junior_Logo.png? Thanks. Werieth ( talk) 14:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
After an extremely close race, Round 3 is over. 244 points secured a place in Round 4, which is comparable to previous years- 321 was required in 2013, while 243 points were needed in 2012. Pool C's
Godot13 (
submissions) was the round's highest scorer, mostly due to a 32 featured pictures, including both scans and photographs. Also from Pool C,
Casliber (
submissions) finished second overall, claiming three featured articles, including the high-importance
Grus (constellation). Third place was Pool B's , whose contributions included featured articles
Russian battleship Poltava (1894) and
Russian battleship Peresvet. Pool C saw the highest number of participants advance, with six out of eight making it to the next round.
The round saw this year's first featured portal, with
Sven Manguard (
submissions) taking
Portal:Literature to featured status. The round also saw the first good topic points, thanks to
12george1 (
submissions) and the
2013 Atlantic hurricane season. This means that all content types have been claimed this year. Other contributions of note this round include a featured topic on
Maya Angelou's autobiographies from
Figureskatingfan (
submissions), a good article on the noted Czech footballer
Tomáš Rosický from
Cloudz679 (
submissions) and
a now-featured video game screenshot, freely released due to the efforts of
Sven Manguard (
submissions).
The judges would like to remind participants to update submission pages promptly. This means that content can be checked, and allows those following the competition (including those participating) to keep track of scores effectively. This round has seen discussion about various aspects of the WikiCup's rules and procedures. Those interested in the competition can be assured that formal discussions about how next year's competition will work will be opened shortly, and all are welcome to voice their views then. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn ( talk · contribs) The ed17 ( talk · contribs) and Miyagawa ( talk · contribs) 18:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
I disagree with your decision to delete this file; you weren't very specific in your reasons for doing so. I believe the image is integral to the encyclopedia; since the subject is dead, no possible replacement is available. I disagree with the nominator's opinion that it fails WP:NFCC#8 for the same reasons stated by the uploader (there is no separate article on the subject); since I can't see the description of the file, I can't dispute the WP:NFCC#10a "failure", but the uploader did comment that all available information was in the description. Further, the uploader, Tutelary, voted "Keep"; another editor, Mandruss, did not formally enter a "Keep" vote, but did contribute to the discussion with information and a reduction in image resolution in an effort to prevent the file's deletion. I'm not sure how you concluded that consensus was to delete. More information, please? Thanks.— D'Ranged 1 VTalk 02:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
You have been involved in this issue so I think you should see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Request_topic_ban_for_Andy_Dingley Werieth ( talk) 15:32, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Would you mind restoring Fredcopeman.jpg, I'll get an appropriate fair-use statement written for it within 24 hours of it being restored (assuming it gets restored by Wednesday night). Sorry for the delay, work and a short vacation were busier than expected. But I've some free time over the next day or three. Hobit ( talk) 17:50, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Why did you delete the image of Charmcaster. I was not given a reason. PointsofNoReturn ( talk) 22:14, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Greetings. I see that you closed the discussion of Talk:Yesterday (Beatles song)#Move request (June 2014) a few hours ago, with the conclusion to effect the move from Yesterday. While I don't object to the result, I would submit that the closure may have been premature, there being insufficient demonstration of consensus. I also feel that the summary of the discussion could be improved, particularly in that it frames the debate entirely in terms of whether or not the article was the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of the term Yesterday. I presented very carefully documented evidence and reasoning that the article was indeed the primary topic, but nevertheless expressed modest support for the move for reasons unrelated to WP:PRIMARYTOPIC; I also presented a compromise proposal to effect the proposed move while leaving Yesterday as a redirect to the moved article, in respect of the strong empirical evidence that it is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC as that editing policy is presently defined. Yet none of this is noted in the discussion summary. ~ Respectfully yours — Jaydiem ( talk) 17:18, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to use File:US Senators' Responsiveness to Income Groups (107th-111th Congresses).png e.g. at [3]. While the American Political Science Association or their authors own their annual meeting paper copyrights, the idea that either would ever object to the use of a chart appearing in one of them is, well, I would just say it's very profoundly unlikely, around the one in a million level. Would you please restore the graph? EllenCT ( talk) 14:40, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi! Would you care to review my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 ( talk) 08:21, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Since you've chosen to delete images that were used in Windows XP, could you please "finish the job" by making appropriate edits to the article that now contains several redlinks. As it was your decision to delete the files, it really shouldn't be left to other editors to fix the mess that you've left in the article. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 16:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like to request that the file LeAnne_Howe.jpg be undeleted. An appropriate and corrected permissions request has been forwarded to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and should be pending review now. In the mean time, I thought I'd put the needed "OTRS pending" to keep the file from being prematurely deleted. Please let me know if there are additional steps I should take to replace this file. Thanks! -- Taylorjhodges ( talk) 19:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, you download the ET logo but you have trunckated half of if. The official logo have the ANSYS part. Could you upload the complete image ? 213.30.139.86 ( talk) 09:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your review of this article, it's my first GA :-) As for other GA articles including abstracting and indexing services, there is currently only 1 other GA journal article, The Accounting Review. It's in only 3 databases (far as I can see), so the section is smaller and not presented as a list. I also just noticed that I didn't respond to 2 of your questions... "Does any source include the reason why the journal went to online only?": I happen to know that it was for financial reasons (not enough paper subscriptions any more), but although the person who told me that certainly is reliable and "in the know", that still is not an RS in the WP sense... I'll keep an eye out for a source, perhaps the society will post some minutes or something like that. "In the reception section, the journals that cited it the most often, it lists this journal itself". That is indeed correct and almost always the case for specialist journals in a smaller field. This journal gets citations from many different journals (it's rather interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary, so that too is to be expected) , so even though it is itself one of the top 5 "citers", the proportion of self-citations is actually pretty low (3%, I've seen journals go over 50%...). Of course, although all these figures can be reliably sourced, their interpretation is mine, so it cannot be included in the article. That's generally a problem with articles on academic journals, because preciously little is written about them (as opposed to articles that appeared in them, but that's a different thing).
BTW, can I pick your brain once more? The bot notice on my talk page mentioned that having been promoted to GA, the article is eligible for DYK. I was thinking of an appropriate hook, but all I can come up with is "...that Genes, Brain and Behavior has developed standards for the publication of mouse mutant studies?" which strikes me as a little bit boring. Do you perhaps have a better idea? Thanks! -- Randykitty ( talk) 15:09, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I think you erred in deleting this file. This was a picture of Dexter as a 14 year old dancing the Twist as discussed at length in the article. Dexter is now nearly seventy so clearly no free equivalent can now be produced of this image as his appearance has changed beyond recognition. Could you undelete it please? Thanks. Philafrenzy ( talk) 21:40, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, TLSuda. I uploadad an altered version of an image you deleted a couple months ago. I would like you to review the image to make sure it's okay. If you don't think it's okay, feel free to delete it. NintendoFan ( Talk, Contribs) 02:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Ilir Jaçellari (the author of photo) had sent a message in wiki's email permissions-en@wikimedia.org on 3 July 2014. Also i have this picture in my email,which i received from Ilir AlbertBikaj ( talk) 10:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. How do you do?
Hope I am not catching you in a busy time.
Looks like File:Googlelabel.JPG is badly downsized. If I had a larger version, I could crop out Firefox and downsize it properly without making important parts unusable. Could you please see if it is possible to restore one of its past revisions?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (
talk)
14:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I don't understand this. Did my note on the file talk page not make sense? - Sitush ( talk) 15:58, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
You recently deleted file File:Admiral Tahiliani.jpg I would like to know, have your reviewed the WP:OTRS token? CutestPenguin { talk • contribs} 07:38, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, you said that the nomination was not set up properly could you please help me to achieve this, cheers. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 13:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello TLSuda. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Constantin Brâncoveanu University, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to schools. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 20:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar | |
This is for all of the hard work you do, especially deleting files! Your work is much appreciated! Corkythehornetfan Talk 21:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC) |
Hello TLSuda, How have you been? Can you please restore the mentioned file? OTRS confirmed therefore i need to transfer it to the Commons. Thanks you in advance! ~ Nahid Talk 11:30, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I found that List of Ministers of Education and Culture of Cyprus exists. I created a redirect at List of Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Cyprus. I guess I shoudl ahve looked more thoroughly. In any case, I have updated the existing article to clean it up and bring it up to date. Is Draft:List of Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Cyprus eligible for WP:G6? Thanks. - Whpq ( talk) 04:32, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
I noticed that you deleted File:World Resources Institute logo.jpg as unused non-free media. However it was in use (I restored the older, non-copyvio history of the World Resources Institute article). I just wanted to check with you to see if there was any reason why I shouldn't restore the file. Thanks. Guettarda ( talk) 19:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Your name was top of mind because you did the GA review on Fluor Corp. where I have a COI and closed out an image issue related to Paxata, where I also have a COI. I also have a COI on Invisalign and have prepared a draft here that should make it almost GA-ready, except that it will also need a summary of what is said about it in medical journals before it's done (next on my To Do list). I don't know if this kind of thing interests you, but if you have time to review the article and respond to the Request Edit it would be appreciated. CorporateM ( Talk) 23:03, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! Once I finish that last remaining section of the Invisalign article, it will be on the road to being our first GA on a medical product. For BabyFirst, I've shared a draft on the Talk page just now. Though realistically in most cases these articles are abandoned, I think it is good practice to let a suggested draft stew for a couple weeks in case someone else wants an opportunity to have input. So definitely WP:NORUSH. Besides, the GAN queue is already overwhelmed with my submissions ;-) CorporateM ( Talk) 04:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I was away from Wikipedia for a while. You deleted File:StereocardCarabao.jpg - (F4: File without a source for more than 7 days) was the reason stated on April 25,2014. I need to work on the file again, but don't remember what parameters were missing since image was on Carabao page for several years until someone replaced it with a modern picture. Is it possible to undelete image temporarily at this late date, so I can see the original. Thanks - Athrash | Talk 00:58, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
It is not replaceable with a free equivalent. Please do not delete fair-use images that you have not found a free equivalent for. I do not check my wikipedia account daily.-- Craigboy ( talk) 19:01, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
May I know the reason to remove the picture from Yatessh M. Acharya page? I've taken a written permission from the artist to use the picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jatilsharma ( talk • contribs) 09:28, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello. You recently deleted a photo that I added of Mark Lawrence, bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina. I got the photo from the photo gallery on the media room section of the diocesan website, where a caption describes each photo as "shared publicly." I tried to provide adequate information about this in my upload. It certainly sounded to me like the photos had been released into the public domain for purposes such as this. Can you help me figure out what I need to do differently? Thanks. Dunncon13 ( talk) 14:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Regarding this warning, I wonder if that user's continuing campaign against me would have any relevance. If not, fine, I'll just work on developing thicker calluses. ~ J. Johnson (JJ) ( talk) 23:01, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
The draft has been stewing on the Talk page for about a week now and I was wondering if you still had an interest in considering the material. CorporateM ( Talk) 19:00, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:WAFC True Oldies Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, TLSuda,
Apparently you received my message regarding my inadvertent uploading of the photo of the B-50 at Biggs AFB. As soon as I realized my mistake, I notified the folks at "Media Copyright" as soon as possible.
As you know, I was just trying to learn how to upload a photo. Well, I guess I learned "too well!"
Apparently, you are the person who actually deleted my inadvertent uploading. Thank you.
I admit that I am fairly new to editing or making any "edit requests." And, today was my first try at learning how to upload a photo. Heck, I still get confused as to which "talk" page to use in corresponding or to get replies! (Yours, mine, or someone else's?)
As a clear example, I happened to stumble into your brief message saying that you had deleted the photo. I found it by looking back at my “Contributions” page and clicking on the "Media Copyright” contribution that I had made earlier. (That is, it wasn't on my talk page, Eeekster's talk page or your talk page.)
Golly, if someone writes to me, how am I to know without a lot of “digging?”
Nevertheless, the photo was indeed deleted per my frantic request. Yet, I was sorry to see it go. (My Dad was a SAC bomber pilot, and, we were stationed at Biggs AFB for a while. While at Biggs, Dad flew B-29s, B-50s and B-47s.) But, as I admitted earlier today, I had not yet checked copyright issues.
Rest assured that I will be much more careful in the future. Hopefully, one day I can upload that photo again. I know that I am prejudiced when I say that I think it is a pretty darned-good photo, not to mention its connection to Dad.
Thanks again for your time and attention. Oh, no reply is needed, OK? (Besides, how would I find it?!)
Sincerely, Rob
BeatlesVox ( talk) 01:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, TL (if I may),
Thanks for your message. Yeah, you better believe that I handled the issue of the inadvertent uploading of the B-50 photo quickly. I was in a panic! ("What have I done?!")
As I'm fairly new to editing (MINOR ones) and "edit requests," please allow me a question. I admit that it sounds a bit paranoid...
When you wrote that you "pinged" me, you said that I will get a notification that you mentioned me. My question: you mentioned me to whom? (A particular discussion group on mutual topics?)
Also, is this related to "Watch this page?" I don't think I've used that feature yet. Perhaps, I should since I have admitted that I have trouble knowing that someone has replied to me, especially when their reply is on their "talk" page.
Also, when you said that this is usually the way people find out that there is a discussion, are those discussions dealing with what I have been writing about? Such as, this article or that article? Or, this photo or that photo?
I hope that you don't mind my questions. But, I am trying to learn. I have been trying to do so on my own by reading certain "instructions pages." But, heck, even on the simplest things (to me), there are two or three pages' worth of instructions. (!!) Thus, I usually just give up.
Well, thanks again for your time. Please write back when you get a chance. Thanks in advance!
Rob
Oh, I'll check the box for "Watch this page." Hopefully that will help me to know that you have replied. (I hope you do.) :-O
BeatlesVox ( talk) 19:50, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, TL,
Thanks for your latest message explaining more to me about the "pings" and the "Watchlist." Oh, thanks for "pinging" me in that last message to me. (So much easier to know that you wrote!) And, yes, that's how I knew that I had a new message from you earlier today as well. As a result of your latest message, I now have a better understanding. Thanks for the info!
When I get a chance, I'll write to an online "friend" of mine who sent me that photo of the B-50 at Biggs AFB. I'll see if he can tell me any copyright and other necessary info. If so, I'll plan to upload the photo again. Then I plan it as a replacement to the one in the "810th Air Division" article. I've already written to the provider (RuthAS) of the "misplaced" B-50 photo in that article, and, she gave me her blessings in terms of replacing her photo with mine. I hope that I can do so one day. Then a plane from Dad's unit (the 97th Bomb Wing, one of two wings in the division) will be properly displayed in the 810th's article.
Well, I guess that's it for now. Thanks again for your time. Take care.
Rob
BeatlesVox ( talk) 02:18, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BabyFirst, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC Network. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
The file was deleted because of alleged copyright violation! That makes NO sense. It is a single image from a movie that is 93 minutes long ( /info/en/?search=Hachi:_A_Dog%27s_Tale). Similar images from the movie have been used in blogs and reviews of this movie elsewhere.
The purpose of adding this image was to create an entry for "Forrest", one of the dogs that acted in the movie. And to convert the corresponding entry in the main page (on the right hand side of /info/en/?search=Hachi:_A_Dog%27s_Tale) into a hyperlink so users could navigate from there and see the Wikipedia entry for "Forrest" that would have this image.
The "copyright violation" was probably flagged by some automatic software. Please review this and restore the status of the file File:Forrest (as Hachi) walking.jpg
Thanks!
Sudhindranath ( talk) 14:37, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
The MfD backlog is getting quite large. It would be nice if you could take a look at it. Armbrust The Homunculus 07:00, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
In February you converted File:East Wind Over Weehawken, Edward Hopper 1934.tiff from a non-free file to a free per this NFCR discussion. However during the discussion the size of the file was reduced, and the original removed from view. Could you restore the original file? Armbrust The Homunculus 10:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
I see have been very active on OTRS. Great job. S Philbrick (Talk) 14:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks for taking care of that mess, but I think I missed one. I tagged File:LEROYTHORPE00000000018.jpg but it seems I never added it to the mass deletion discussion. Can you delete it or do I need to open a new discussion? Meters ( talk) 03:48, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Could you please restore this image? It looks like it was removed from the article Leeds Rhinos for no apparent reason. J Mo 101 ( talk) 06:38, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
I've just amended your comment by adding one word which is what I think you meant "Your photos are not in danger of being removed, simply moved to where they can achieve even more use" - by adding the word not. Apolgies if I've misunderstood and feel free to revert. Nthep ( talk) 11:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I was hoping to get some information on the File:Image of Leslie Benzies.jpg i uploaded recently. I found this image on Flickr with the CC tags: Attribution [4] which i gave a link to the original source in the upload and NonCommercial [5] which was for this purpose. Was the licensing i listed on the image upload incorrect? If not what steps should i take to upload this image?
Thanks, Jhona43 ( talk) 16:20, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
I just got a note from them saying they felt the following sentence: "As of 2014, it has 81 million viewers[23] and is broadcast in 33 countries, in ten languages.[24]" would be better off in the "Distribution expansion" section. Wondering if you had an opinion on it. CorporateM ( Talk) 18:16, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi
File:ARCserveManager.JPG has suddenly vanished from its article and its seems it is deleted.
Do you happen to know why? (I thought you might, given that you removed the defunct code from the article.)
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (
talk)
10:05, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Have a look at your Commons talk as soon as you get a chance. Thanks. INeverCry 00:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Shouldn't /info/en/?search=File:Football_Federation_Australia_logo.svg be reduced in resolution as well? Holdek ( talk) 03:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
There seems to be a "nowiki" end tag missing here. You should probably fix this yourself so that the signature is expanded correctly. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 13:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello there, I noticed you deleted this image stating that it violated "non-free content". Am not sure what you mean, I am the author of the photograph. I gave my permission (stated in the copyright excerpt). For your reference, here is the image you deleted /info/en/?search=Special:Upload?wpDestFile=Image_of_the_HKG%E2%80%93Zhuhai%E2%80%93Macau_Bridge_under_construction,_june_2014.jpg James 07:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheJae ( talk • contribs)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 13 |
There is a ticket concerning image you deleted: ticket:2014060710004722. Could you look at it? Ankry ( talk) 08:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
Could you please explain why you've just deleted this. It had a valid NFC claim for the Fred Copeman article. Andy Dingley ( talk) 00:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of File:Fredcopeman.jpg. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Andy Dingley ( talk) 01:33, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi TLSuda. A friend contacted me a while ago about the deletion notice on the image that he uploaded. I am the photographer and will re-upload with a proper license. -- BladeBronson ( talk) 20:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Godfather stars.jpg This file from March 11 came up in discussion at MCQ recently. It's been around so long, I had to replace the links showing identical photos. While doing that, I noticed that there are also some undecided files for March 10, 12 and 13th. Did I find an "oops"? :) Thanks, We hope ( talk) 20:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Bots may never sleep but it looks like they take a nap from time to time. :) Thanks for the barnstar!!! We hope ( talk) 21:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Can I please ask why you deleted it, especially when it was uploaded with the consent of the owners with their contact info provided for confirmation?-- Nadirali نادرالی ( talk) 18:56, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
You closed the non-free content review of File:Doctor Balli.jpg with the explanation "Image is being used within policy." Could you please elaborate on how you reached that conclusion? -- Holdek ( talk) 03:26, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Would you mind if I combined the three NFCR request on ANRFC into a single section? Cheers, Armbrust The Homunculus 14:43, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Why did you remove the {{ di-missing article links}} template without addressing the problem? There is still no separate fair use rationale for each article as the single fair use rationale mentions multiple articles. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 15:43, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Can you please provide a link to the talk page discussion that you believe justified the (highly impactful) move of Yesterday? It is not on Talk:Yesterday, and I don't where to look for it. -- R'n'B ( call me Russ) 17:11, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi TLSuda. I just signed into Wikipedia for the first time in a while, noticed that you had deleted a photo file I had uploaded onto an article I wrote about actor Zack Norman, and saw this message: 00:43, 3 June 2014 TLSuda (talk | contribs) deleted page File:As Ira in Romancing the Stone (1984).jpg (F7: Violates non-free content criterion #1). However, I believe this deletion was made in error, as there is no free equivalent with which the photo can be replaced, and therefore the photo does in fact fall within the first non-free content criterion. I realize the image is owned by 20th Century Fox (it is in fact an official studio publicity still) and shows my subject in character as Ira in their feature Romancing the Stone, but that is precisely the point of including this particular photograph: to show Mr. Norman as he is most easily recognized by the public, which is as this particular character in this particular film. Of course I could replace the image with a photo of Mr. Norman as he looks in everyday life, but that would defeat the purpose. There, I would like to request that you please reconsider and reinstate the file as it was prior to your deletion. Thank you so much! Best regards, Matzohboy ( talk) 01:45, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Can you please close Wikipedia:NFCR#File:Disney_Junior_Logo.png? Thanks. Werieth ( talk) 14:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
After an extremely close race, Round 3 is over. 244 points secured a place in Round 4, which is comparable to previous years- 321 was required in 2013, while 243 points were needed in 2012. Pool C's
Godot13 (
submissions) was the round's highest scorer, mostly due to a 32 featured pictures, including both scans and photographs. Also from Pool C,
Casliber (
submissions) finished second overall, claiming three featured articles, including the high-importance
Grus (constellation). Third place was Pool B's , whose contributions included featured articles
Russian battleship Poltava (1894) and
Russian battleship Peresvet. Pool C saw the highest number of participants advance, with six out of eight making it to the next round.
The round saw this year's first featured portal, with
Sven Manguard (
submissions) taking
Portal:Literature to featured status. The round also saw the first good topic points, thanks to
12george1 (
submissions) and the
2013 Atlantic hurricane season. This means that all content types have been claimed this year. Other contributions of note this round include a featured topic on
Maya Angelou's autobiographies from
Figureskatingfan (
submissions), a good article on the noted Czech footballer
Tomáš Rosický from
Cloudz679 (
submissions) and
a now-featured video game screenshot, freely released due to the efforts of
Sven Manguard (
submissions).
The judges would like to remind participants to update submission pages promptly. This means that content can be checked, and allows those following the competition (including those participating) to keep track of scores effectively. This round has seen discussion about various aspects of the WikiCup's rules and procedures. Those interested in the competition can be assured that formal discussions about how next year's competition will work will be opened shortly, and all are welcome to voice their views then. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn ( talk · contribs) The ed17 ( talk · contribs) and Miyagawa ( talk · contribs) 18:48, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
I disagree with your decision to delete this file; you weren't very specific in your reasons for doing so. I believe the image is integral to the encyclopedia; since the subject is dead, no possible replacement is available. I disagree with the nominator's opinion that it fails WP:NFCC#8 for the same reasons stated by the uploader (there is no separate article on the subject); since I can't see the description of the file, I can't dispute the WP:NFCC#10a "failure", but the uploader did comment that all available information was in the description. Further, the uploader, Tutelary, voted "Keep"; another editor, Mandruss, did not formally enter a "Keep" vote, but did contribute to the discussion with information and a reduction in image resolution in an effort to prevent the file's deletion. I'm not sure how you concluded that consensus was to delete. More information, please? Thanks.— D'Ranged 1 VTalk 02:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
You have been involved in this issue so I think you should see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Request_topic_ban_for_Andy_Dingley Werieth ( talk) 15:32, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Would you mind restoring Fredcopeman.jpg, I'll get an appropriate fair-use statement written for it within 24 hours of it being restored (assuming it gets restored by Wednesday night). Sorry for the delay, work and a short vacation were busier than expected. But I've some free time over the next day or three. Hobit ( talk) 17:50, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Why did you delete the image of Charmcaster. I was not given a reason. PointsofNoReturn ( talk) 22:14, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Greetings. I see that you closed the discussion of Talk:Yesterday (Beatles song)#Move request (June 2014) a few hours ago, with the conclusion to effect the move from Yesterday. While I don't object to the result, I would submit that the closure may have been premature, there being insufficient demonstration of consensus. I also feel that the summary of the discussion could be improved, particularly in that it frames the debate entirely in terms of whether or not the article was the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of the term Yesterday. I presented very carefully documented evidence and reasoning that the article was indeed the primary topic, but nevertheless expressed modest support for the move for reasons unrelated to WP:PRIMARYTOPIC; I also presented a compromise proposal to effect the proposed move while leaving Yesterday as a redirect to the moved article, in respect of the strong empirical evidence that it is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC as that editing policy is presently defined. Yet none of this is noted in the discussion summary. ~ Respectfully yours — Jaydiem ( talk) 17:18, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to use File:US Senators' Responsiveness to Income Groups (107th-111th Congresses).png e.g. at [3]. While the American Political Science Association or their authors own their annual meeting paper copyrights, the idea that either would ever object to the use of a chart appearing in one of them is, well, I would just say it's very profoundly unlikely, around the one in a million level. Would you please restore the graph? EllenCT ( talk) 14:40, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi! Would you care to review my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 ( talk) 08:21, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Since you've chosen to delete images that were used in Windows XP, could you please "finish the job" by making appropriate edits to the article that now contains several redlinks. As it was your decision to delete the files, it really shouldn't be left to other editors to fix the mess that you've left in the article. -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 16:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like to request that the file LeAnne_Howe.jpg be undeleted. An appropriate and corrected permissions request has been forwarded to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and should be pending review now. In the mean time, I thought I'd put the needed "OTRS pending" to keep the file from being prematurely deleted. Please let me know if there are additional steps I should take to replace this file. Thanks! -- Taylorjhodges ( talk) 19:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, you download the ET logo but you have trunckated half of if. The official logo have the ANSYS part. Could you upload the complete image ? 213.30.139.86 ( talk) 09:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your review of this article, it's my first GA :-) As for other GA articles including abstracting and indexing services, there is currently only 1 other GA journal article, The Accounting Review. It's in only 3 databases (far as I can see), so the section is smaller and not presented as a list. I also just noticed that I didn't respond to 2 of your questions... "Does any source include the reason why the journal went to online only?": I happen to know that it was for financial reasons (not enough paper subscriptions any more), but although the person who told me that certainly is reliable and "in the know", that still is not an RS in the WP sense... I'll keep an eye out for a source, perhaps the society will post some minutes or something like that. "In the reception section, the journals that cited it the most often, it lists this journal itself". That is indeed correct and almost always the case for specialist journals in a smaller field. This journal gets citations from many different journals (it's rather interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary, so that too is to be expected) , so even though it is itself one of the top 5 "citers", the proportion of self-citations is actually pretty low (3%, I've seen journals go over 50%...). Of course, although all these figures can be reliably sourced, their interpretation is mine, so it cannot be included in the article. That's generally a problem with articles on academic journals, because preciously little is written about them (as opposed to articles that appeared in them, but that's a different thing).
BTW, can I pick your brain once more? The bot notice on my talk page mentioned that having been promoted to GA, the article is eligible for DYK. I was thinking of an appropriate hook, but all I can come up with is "...that Genes, Brain and Behavior has developed standards for the publication of mouse mutant studies?" which strikes me as a little bit boring. Do you perhaps have a better idea? Thanks! -- Randykitty ( talk) 15:09, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I think you erred in deleting this file. This was a picture of Dexter as a 14 year old dancing the Twist as discussed at length in the article. Dexter is now nearly seventy so clearly no free equivalent can now be produced of this image as his appearance has changed beyond recognition. Could you undelete it please? Thanks. Philafrenzy ( talk) 21:40, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, TLSuda. I uploadad an altered version of an image you deleted a couple months ago. I would like you to review the image to make sure it's okay. If you don't think it's okay, feel free to delete it. NintendoFan ( Talk, Contribs) 02:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Ilir Jaçellari (the author of photo) had sent a message in wiki's email permissions-en@wikimedia.org on 3 July 2014. Also i have this picture in my email,which i received from Ilir AlbertBikaj ( talk) 10:06, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. How do you do?
Hope I am not catching you in a busy time.
Looks like File:Googlelabel.JPG is badly downsized. If I had a larger version, I could crop out Firefox and downsize it properly without making important parts unusable. Could you please see if it is possible to restore one of its past revisions?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (
talk)
14:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I don't understand this. Did my note on the file talk page not make sense? - Sitush ( talk) 15:58, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
You recently deleted file File:Admiral Tahiliani.jpg I would like to know, have your reviewed the WP:OTRS token? CutestPenguin { talk • contribs} 07:38, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi, you said that the nomination was not set up properly could you please help me to achieve this, cheers. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 13:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello TLSuda. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Constantin Brâncoveanu University, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 does not apply to schools. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/ Stalk 20:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Admin's Barnstar | |
This is for all of the hard work you do, especially deleting files! Your work is much appreciated! Corkythehornetfan Talk 21:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC) |
Hello TLSuda, How have you been? Can you please restore the mentioned file? OTRS confirmed therefore i need to transfer it to the Commons. Thanks you in advance! ~ Nahid Talk 11:30, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I found that List of Ministers of Education and Culture of Cyprus exists. I created a redirect at List of Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Cyprus. I guess I shoudl ahve looked more thoroughly. In any case, I have updated the existing article to clean it up and bring it up to date. Is Draft:List of Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Cyprus eligible for WP:G6? Thanks. - Whpq ( talk) 04:32, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
I noticed that you deleted File:World Resources Institute logo.jpg as unused non-free media. However it was in use (I restored the older, non-copyvio history of the World Resources Institute article). I just wanted to check with you to see if there was any reason why I shouldn't restore the file. Thanks. Guettarda ( talk) 19:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Your name was top of mind because you did the GA review on Fluor Corp. where I have a COI and closed out an image issue related to Paxata, where I also have a COI. I also have a COI on Invisalign and have prepared a draft here that should make it almost GA-ready, except that it will also need a summary of what is said about it in medical journals before it's done (next on my To Do list). I don't know if this kind of thing interests you, but if you have time to review the article and respond to the Request Edit it would be appreciated. CorporateM ( Talk) 23:03, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! Once I finish that last remaining section of the Invisalign article, it will be on the road to being our first GA on a medical product. For BabyFirst, I've shared a draft on the Talk page just now. Though realistically in most cases these articles are abandoned, I think it is good practice to let a suggested draft stew for a couple weeks in case someone else wants an opportunity to have input. So definitely WP:NORUSH. Besides, the GAN queue is already overwhelmed with my submissions ;-) CorporateM ( Talk) 04:24, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I was away from Wikipedia for a while. You deleted File:StereocardCarabao.jpg - (F4: File without a source for more than 7 days) was the reason stated on April 25,2014. I need to work on the file again, but don't remember what parameters were missing since image was on Carabao page for several years until someone replaced it with a modern picture. Is it possible to undelete image temporarily at this late date, so I can see the original. Thanks - Athrash | Talk 00:58, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
It is not replaceable with a free equivalent. Please do not delete fair-use images that you have not found a free equivalent for. I do not check my wikipedia account daily.-- Craigboy ( talk) 19:01, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
May I know the reason to remove the picture from Yatessh M. Acharya page? I've taken a written permission from the artist to use the picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jatilsharma ( talk • contribs) 09:28, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello. You recently deleted a photo that I added of Mark Lawrence, bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina. I got the photo from the photo gallery on the media room section of the diocesan website, where a caption describes each photo as "shared publicly." I tried to provide adequate information about this in my upload. It certainly sounded to me like the photos had been released into the public domain for purposes such as this. Can you help me figure out what I need to do differently? Thanks. Dunncon13 ( talk) 14:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Regarding this warning, I wonder if that user's continuing campaign against me would have any relevance. If not, fine, I'll just work on developing thicker calluses. ~ J. Johnson (JJ) ( talk) 23:01, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
The draft has been stewing on the Talk page for about a week now and I was wondering if you still had an interest in considering the material. CorporateM ( Talk) 19:00, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:WAFC True Oldies Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, TLSuda,
Apparently you received my message regarding my inadvertent uploading of the photo of the B-50 at Biggs AFB. As soon as I realized my mistake, I notified the folks at "Media Copyright" as soon as possible.
As you know, I was just trying to learn how to upload a photo. Well, I guess I learned "too well!"
Apparently, you are the person who actually deleted my inadvertent uploading. Thank you.
I admit that I am fairly new to editing or making any "edit requests." And, today was my first try at learning how to upload a photo. Heck, I still get confused as to which "talk" page to use in corresponding or to get replies! (Yours, mine, or someone else's?)
As a clear example, I happened to stumble into your brief message saying that you had deleted the photo. I found it by looking back at my “Contributions” page and clicking on the "Media Copyright” contribution that I had made earlier. (That is, it wasn't on my talk page, Eeekster's talk page or your talk page.)
Golly, if someone writes to me, how am I to know without a lot of “digging?”
Nevertheless, the photo was indeed deleted per my frantic request. Yet, I was sorry to see it go. (My Dad was a SAC bomber pilot, and, we were stationed at Biggs AFB for a while. While at Biggs, Dad flew B-29s, B-50s and B-47s.) But, as I admitted earlier today, I had not yet checked copyright issues.
Rest assured that I will be much more careful in the future. Hopefully, one day I can upload that photo again. I know that I am prejudiced when I say that I think it is a pretty darned-good photo, not to mention its connection to Dad.
Thanks again for your time and attention. Oh, no reply is needed, OK? (Besides, how would I find it?!)
Sincerely, Rob
BeatlesVox ( talk) 01:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, TL (if I may),
Thanks for your message. Yeah, you better believe that I handled the issue of the inadvertent uploading of the B-50 photo quickly. I was in a panic! ("What have I done?!")
As I'm fairly new to editing (MINOR ones) and "edit requests," please allow me a question. I admit that it sounds a bit paranoid...
When you wrote that you "pinged" me, you said that I will get a notification that you mentioned me. My question: you mentioned me to whom? (A particular discussion group on mutual topics?)
Also, is this related to "Watch this page?" I don't think I've used that feature yet. Perhaps, I should since I have admitted that I have trouble knowing that someone has replied to me, especially when their reply is on their "talk" page.
Also, when you said that this is usually the way people find out that there is a discussion, are those discussions dealing with what I have been writing about? Such as, this article or that article? Or, this photo or that photo?
I hope that you don't mind my questions. But, I am trying to learn. I have been trying to do so on my own by reading certain "instructions pages." But, heck, even on the simplest things (to me), there are two or three pages' worth of instructions. (!!) Thus, I usually just give up.
Well, thanks again for your time. Please write back when you get a chance. Thanks in advance!
Rob
Oh, I'll check the box for "Watch this page." Hopefully that will help me to know that you have replied. (I hope you do.) :-O
BeatlesVox ( talk) 19:50, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, TL,
Thanks for your latest message explaining more to me about the "pings" and the "Watchlist." Oh, thanks for "pinging" me in that last message to me. (So much easier to know that you wrote!) And, yes, that's how I knew that I had a new message from you earlier today as well. As a result of your latest message, I now have a better understanding. Thanks for the info!
When I get a chance, I'll write to an online "friend" of mine who sent me that photo of the B-50 at Biggs AFB. I'll see if he can tell me any copyright and other necessary info. If so, I'll plan to upload the photo again. Then I plan it as a replacement to the one in the "810th Air Division" article. I've already written to the provider (RuthAS) of the "misplaced" B-50 photo in that article, and, she gave me her blessings in terms of replacing her photo with mine. I hope that I can do so one day. Then a plane from Dad's unit (the 97th Bomb Wing, one of two wings in the division) will be properly displayed in the 810th's article.
Well, I guess that's it for now. Thanks again for your time. Take care.
Rob
BeatlesVox ( talk) 02:18, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited BabyFirst, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC Network. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
The file was deleted because of alleged copyright violation! That makes NO sense. It is a single image from a movie that is 93 minutes long ( /info/en/?search=Hachi:_A_Dog%27s_Tale). Similar images from the movie have been used in blogs and reviews of this movie elsewhere.
The purpose of adding this image was to create an entry for "Forrest", one of the dogs that acted in the movie. And to convert the corresponding entry in the main page (on the right hand side of /info/en/?search=Hachi:_A_Dog%27s_Tale) into a hyperlink so users could navigate from there and see the Wikipedia entry for "Forrest" that would have this image.
The "copyright violation" was probably flagged by some automatic software. Please review this and restore the status of the file File:Forrest (as Hachi) walking.jpg
Thanks!
Sudhindranath ( talk) 14:37, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
The MfD backlog is getting quite large. It would be nice if you could take a look at it. Armbrust The Homunculus 07:00, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
In February you converted File:East Wind Over Weehawken, Edward Hopper 1934.tiff from a non-free file to a free per this NFCR discussion. However during the discussion the size of the file was reduced, and the original removed from view. Could you restore the original file? Armbrust The Homunculus 10:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
I see have been very active on OTRS. Great job. S Philbrick (Talk) 14:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks for taking care of that mess, but I think I missed one. I tagged File:LEROYTHORPE00000000018.jpg but it seems I never added it to the mass deletion discussion. Can you delete it or do I need to open a new discussion? Meters ( talk) 03:48, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Could you please restore this image? It looks like it was removed from the article Leeds Rhinos for no apparent reason. J Mo 101 ( talk) 06:38, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
I've just amended your comment by adding one word which is what I think you meant "Your photos are not in danger of being removed, simply moved to where they can achieve even more use" - by adding the word not. Apolgies if I've misunderstood and feel free to revert. Nthep ( talk) 11:59, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I was hoping to get some information on the File:Image of Leslie Benzies.jpg i uploaded recently. I found this image on Flickr with the CC tags: Attribution [4] which i gave a link to the original source in the upload and NonCommercial [5] which was for this purpose. Was the licensing i listed on the image upload incorrect? If not what steps should i take to upload this image?
Thanks, Jhona43 ( talk) 16:20, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
I just got a note from them saying they felt the following sentence: "As of 2014, it has 81 million viewers[23] and is broadcast in 33 countries, in ten languages.[24]" would be better off in the "Distribution expansion" section. Wondering if you had an opinion on it. CorporateM ( Talk) 18:16, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi
File:ARCserveManager.JPG has suddenly vanished from its article and its seems it is deleted.
Do you happen to know why? (I thought you might, given that you removed the defunct code from the article.)
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (
talk)
10:05, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Have a look at your Commons talk as soon as you get a chance. Thanks. INeverCry 00:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Shouldn't /info/en/?search=File:Football_Federation_Australia_logo.svg be reduced in resolution as well? Holdek ( talk) 03:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
There seems to be a "nowiki" end tag missing here. You should probably fix this yourself so that the signature is expanded correctly. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 13:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello there, I noticed you deleted this image stating that it violated "non-free content". Am not sure what you mean, I am the author of the photograph. I gave my permission (stated in the copyright excerpt). For your reference, here is the image you deleted /info/en/?search=Special:Upload?wpDestFile=Image_of_the_HKG%E2%80%93Zhuhai%E2%80%93Macau_Bridge_under_construction,_june_2014.jpg James 07:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheJae ( talk • contribs)