This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I am trying to recover the text of Draft: Neurosexism, a draft article you declined on March 16 that has now been deleted. Can you help me with this? J.birch2 ( talk) 20:49, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello SITH, I added more sources as asked. Some of them are in italian, as the event take place in Italy. Despite this, I added a few references in english, like a festival review by an american magazine and a live album recorded at the festival. Thank you for your help, just let me know what else can be done. Sicurocanasta ( talk) 11:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
please review this action
17:14, 16 March 2019 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Sexual and Gender Minority Research Office (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of https://isgmh.northwestern.edu/2017/01/20/21st-century-cures-act-calls-for-expanded-nih-focus-on-sexual-and-gender-minority-health/, http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/DBASSE_191476.PDF) (thank)
I find the action taken above does not warrant a g12deletion.
I believe even with a copyright symbol at the bottom of a NATIONAL ACADEMIES website page, they are a government agency and therefore all content is public domain when published.
I also know that 95% of the cut and paste work from Northwestern University was the actual line by line text of the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016 which has its own wiki article but not any reference to the portions of this legislation I was including in my article.
THESE ARE SERIOUS WORDS WHERE THE LGBT COMMUNITY IS IDENTIFIED BY THE US GOVERNMENT AS A MINORITY POPULATION. You do cut and paste in such cases, so you are certain you did not leave anything out. Would you prefer I add this information from the National Register instead of a decent University.
I like your work and your user handle. Will you handle the BOTBOY's abusive deletion please and chastise them for not giving me sufficient time to tackle the issues you pointed out to a few hours ago.
Much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrphilip ( talk • contribs) 04:22, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
BOTBOY, the deleting administrator was RHaworth and you can leave a request on his talk page if you wish to have a copy sent to you. The deletion certainly wasn't abusive and I am in no position to either desire or have grounds to
chastiseanyone over this. Many thanks, SITH (talk) 12:06, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Esknyazeva ( talk) 12:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)I added links to all of the facts on the page G-Core Labs company Esknyazeva ( talk) 12:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)made information about the company more neutral Esknyazeva ( talk) 12:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)added big customers of our company with proof links to reliable sources (all our customers which I wrote about gave me a permission to write about them and our business relationship) Esknyazeva ( talk) 12:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)page about G-Core Labs isn't an orphan page anymore, there are two links to the page: from page about [ [1]] and from the page of [ of Tanks] Please, look at our page once again and tell me how to avoid deletion.
Hi, I've resubmitted the page Draft:WebRatio. Can you please review again? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paolorivius ( talk • contribs) 15:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Hey, you recently rejected my Draft:J. Smoke Wallin article and I was curious about what I can do to improve the submission so it is accepted next time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanszalay ( talk • contribs) 18:27, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
There are some sources here, but none that I've seen seem actually to discuss this person in any depth or detail. What he says or is reported as having said contributes exactly nothing to a determination of his notability by Wikipedia standards.I am inclined to agree, have you considered whether Wallin passes WP:BIO? Many thanks, SITH (talk) 22:16, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi! Did I miss anything here? – if so, do please say! You seem to have a good eye for this stuff, and thanks for noticing problems with this one. However, it's my feeling that a page with several years of history and contributions from a number of different editors is (relatively) unlikely to be eligible for speedy, and listing at WP:CP is likely to be the better option in such cases. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 19:02, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
I am sorry that I copied and pasted text from the Minecraft Wiki and put it on the draft one on Wikipedia. However I am still learning the rules so ya.
MoMoCool2005 |
Talk•••
Contributions
19:16, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hey thanks so much for reviewing my submission and for providing feedback. Please forgive my limited knowledge as this is my first submission and entry point into this great community. I was wondering if you might help me understand what you've done. It looks like you deleted the beginning and redacted another part? I def didn't intend to violate any copyright but I do see that I might have used similar language that they did in the article that was cited...was that the mistake? Sorry again for the newb questions but any guidance is much appreciated! -- HIYAthatsmyshoe ( talk) 22:03, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. I just fixed the lead sentence and published and somehow a ton of the other text from the article dropped off! I don't know how that would have happened. Could you possibly help me restore? I'd hate for it to be reviewed right now all messed up.-- HIYAthatsmyshoe ( talk) 22:59, 22 March 2019 (UTC) Dang someone reviewed while the content was down. Ugh can't believe that happened :( HIYAthatsmyshoe ( talk) 23:16, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Ok thanks @justlettersandnumbers that makes sense now. I did pull some of the bullet points from their website when RedAlert had asked me to talk about services they provide. I realize now that too was a dumb move. I will work on it I really do appreciate the help. And no I'm not connected or employed other than living in the triad and having attended events and seen stuff they do. Thought it would be a good topic to get my feet wet on wiki Im def learning a lot. -- HIYAthatsmyshoe ( talk) 23:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC) Or if you guys think prudent to scratch this and move on to trying a new topic I'm open to your guidance. Thanks again. -- HIYAthatsmyshoe ( talk) 23:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi SITH, Thank you for your suggestions for improvement of my draft. I can see from the Wiki guidelines that your criticisms are valid although I had thought that my subject matter was already supported by primary and some secondary sources. My style became rather verbose because most readers, even professional geologists may not be familiar with all of the inter-related concepts and evidence that need to be treated carefully and together to assist comprehension. This explains your impression of an essay rather than an encyclopaedia article. The fundamental observation of sedimentary isostasy was made by Darwin in his account of the Voyage of the Beagle, and many experienced geologists have touched on this difficult subject over the intervening 180 years. My submittal was an attempt to meet the challenge of thorough explanation head-on, as I have found no other encyclopaedia that attempts to clarify these concepts as an integrated whole. I should certainly appreciate any further guidance from you or other Wiki editors that might improve my draft. Geologician ( talk) 19:47, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
FYI, please see Template:Talk page of redirect#Usage, which tells us that talk pages should have content when this template is used. When a round-robin set of page moves results in deleting the original talk page, and you need to re-create that talk page, it is best to re-create it as a hard redirect as I've done at Talk:Aashish Chaudhary. This saves editors a click and takes them from their link to the correct page where the RM has been closed. Thank you! Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 16:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello SITH, thank you kindly for contacting me yesterday on the article about J-Subculture to point out about the deletion proposal. I have added an edit summary line for explanation today. If you could check it by occasion and consider it, I would much appreciate.
It was my first article and I tried to work it out carefully for format, references, inter-linkage with related articles etc., modelling it after similar Wiki articles. I'm aware that it may have consisted of deficiencies from the beginning, but always hoped others would help with contributions and improvements of content. It is an original text that I have created in person and put in research on the topic. The creation of the article took time & labor.
If the article is not deemed appropriate for the platform, I don't object the deletion per se, as I don't want to swim against stream. Nonetheless I would regret seeing all the labor & time invested disappear, so if you could advise what needs to be done to safe it and therewith could reconsider the proposal, I would be much obliged. Thank you very much for your time and guidance, greetings RockmanY RockmanY ( talk) 02:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Why did you close the discussion as no consensus? Hhkohh ( talk) 16:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi StraussInTheHouse. Thank you for your interest in copyright clean-up. I noticed that you have recently listed some drafts at WP:CP. Perhaps you didn't realize it, but whenever you list something there for investigation, you have to notify the person who added the content. There's a template for you to do this - please see the instructions on the copyvio core template. Then the user is supposed to have one week to address the issue before an administrator deals with the case. WP:CP is intended only for the most complex cases. For most cases, the preferred action is for you to remove the copyright material yourself, notify the user of the problem, and then request revision deletion. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 22:21, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello StraussInTheHouse,
Thank you for reviewing my article. I would like to ask about the reason for rejection and as far as I see the reason for deleting the text. As far as I have understood the problem is in the copyrighted content or too big citation that I have used from the source Al- Muttawa. But I used the reference marks and it looked alike a long citation. Now I would like to see the text, is it possible to reconstruct it? Daria Lebedieva ( talk) 17:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi StraussInTheHouse, I overturned the closure at this page, as I see there is continuing room for discussion. It was already a rather "close" consensus, if pressed I'd be leaning more on the side of "no consensus" then in support of the requester. I wanted to leave you a note in case my edit summaries were misleading, the additional listing is only for that reason, not because it was a "non-admin closure". I think there is room for more information, and left a specific question for one editor - would like to give them a chance to respond now. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 22:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
I see the Jan Peterson draft has been flagged for possible copyright violations, but a look at the Copyvio report shows that many of the flagged text sections are book titles, place names, organization names, and even dates. Not sure how these could be written any differently (?) Thanks VanIslander1234 ( talk) 18:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi StraussintheHouse, you recently reviewed my articlr submission on Dr. Elad I. Levy on February 4th, i have made the changes you requested, i cut the article down quite a bit and added in the references for the notable research contributions, and also added in references for his awards and recognition's section. I had resubmmited it and apparently there a two pending submissions for Levy. I would like the one titled "Elad I. Levy" reviewed not the one titled "Elad Levy" reviewed. I appreciate your help with this project, please let me know any other edits you would like made, another reviewer did review it and said they would review the one titled "Elad Levy" since it was a duplicate, but i made all the revisions based on your comments to Elad I. Levy". Please let me know any other advice you have for this page so that it can get accepted! thank you so much! Ashamkhan123 ( talk) 01:23, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I have been working on an article on photographer, Jason Thrasher. I submitted a draft but I may have confused things by putting the template in my sandbox. Thank you for the inline citation recommendation. They are in the draft. ( /info/en/?search=Draft:Jason_Thrasher)--I am not asking for special attention just making sure I complied with your suggestions. I am glad to wait my turn. Thank you for all you do to make this enterprise work. Kmccook ( talk) 02:46, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi I wanted to add the information about Georgian Architect-designer Amiran Patarkalashvili, He has his pages in social media and is the founder of CPA Central PArtnership Foundationa. Why did u decline my article? I don't understand what is the problem — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninogogitidze18 ( talk • contribs) 10:25, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi SITH, I have resubmitted my Sedimentary isostasy draft after making a careful edit to address the concerns mentioned your first review, using Evolution wiki as a model. The range of vocabulary and concepts used in this model have been around even longer than those of Evolution, although they are less familiar to earth scientists. Therefore a Wiki linked approach to publication is indispensible if these related, well-established, concepts are to be considered in their proper context by peers.Thanks Geologician ( talk) 10:44, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
For taking the time to review the article on the Free Burghers. Bhistory 14:20, 28 March 2019 (UTC) |
Hello! I added links and further refined the article in the draft that You checked Draft:Anastasiya_Makarevich. Please check the new version. Also in the future I will improve the article. Savcheg ( talk) 09:21, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Strauss, this is my first time working through the submission process. Can you please let me know what information I need to include inline citations for? Are inline citations the same thing as regular citations? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterMa1234 ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for taking the time to review my draft on the Free Burghers. The article is my first. In regard to the copy right violation on one of the items in the article, please accept my sincere apologies. Reason being purely lack of experience. Thank you for the correction thereof. Please accept my commitment to not repeat said again. Kind Regards Bhistory 14:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boershistory ( talk • contribs)
Hello StraussInTheHouse. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Jason Lewis, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Copyrighted text is mostly a list of books. The rest can be dealt with through revdel. Thank you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
You mentioned consensus in your edit summary. Can you please point me to the discussion? Thanks. - Paul T +/ C 21:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi SITH, Thank you for your confirmation of my article. I had read your comment about why my article was declined. May you give me some advices as how to preference "Reliable sources". I'm new in making contribution to Wiki so I must be made some mistake in preference it. About the article that I submitted for review, I translated it from another Wiki's page, and Im a native and used to do what was wrote in the article so I can verified what in it was true. I'd glad to making more attribution to Wiki if you can help me on how to improve my article. Thank you. 113.161.84.98 ( talk) 13:47, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
I created a draft for 'Baaghi 3', which is the third part in the 'Baaghi' franchise. This was declined. The filming and release of this film is imminent. At what point should I revive the draft and resubmit? The lead actor, Tiger Shroff is one of India's biggest stars and the last film 'Baaghi 2' collected about 259 crore rupees or approximately $35 million. So, it is a notable film. Maybe not enough has been published in the media yet. /info/en/?search=Baaghi_2 /info/en/?search=Tiger_Shroff — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas t5 ( talk • contribs) 16:41, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
I assume that you mean that you are losing the assumption of good faith with regard to the portal creator that you expressed in your comment on the Arbitration request. Yes. That's why Aaaa applies. That refers to the 880-hertz A tone that was stuck in the brain or ear of Robert Schumann, but also the annoyance that I am getting at the damm portals. With Schumann, the Aaaa eventually caused him to pass through the portal to the next world. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:42, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, you've just reviewed my page but I don't know how I could fix it and make it better? You wrote this: Symbol opinion vote.svg Comment: Relies too heavily on SPS / CORPSPAM sources. What does that mean? How can I make my sources better? I've already inputted 27 of them, so I feel like that shows coverage and they're all either from respectable news sources or It sites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.147.97.136 ( talk) 14:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Draft:WEB_Marketing_(company) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.147.97.136 ( talk) 07:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Sir, you declined my draft stating that introduction is appearing more like an advertisement. This is the link sir - Draft:OPEN_Community
Sir, i have just stated the aims and motives of community. There is no other way they can be stated. I have not stated anything in favour of community.With due respect sir, i think stating the aims isn't advertising. Also, stating the aims is crucial so that people can know what our community is aiming to do. This is for informational purpose. I request you to accept my draft submission .
thank you sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManushiKapoor ( talk • contribs) 05:49, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
enrichmentand
innovative, just describe it and say (but don't copy) what reliable sources say about it. SITH (talk) 13:54, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear Sir, I tried to create the article for writer and producer VIpul D shah. i have also put a lot of references but i got a message This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article.
sir i have so many articles about him but still it doesn't qualify. what should i do
https://www.mumbailive.com/en/television/colors-tv-launches-season-3-rising-star-33960 https://www.mid-day.com/articles/indias-first-live-interactive-show-on-television-comes-alive/20565191 https://www.iwmbuzz.com/television/personalities/beautiful-journey-kya-haal-mr-paanchal-enjoyed-making-producer-vipul-d-shah/2018/12/22 https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/Copying-Kapil-will-only-bring-us-criticism-Optimystixs-producer-Vipul-D-Shah/articleshow/50653788.cms https://www.mumbailive.com/en/television/colors-announces-courtroom-sacchai-haazir-ho-swara-bhaskar-32924 https://bestmediainfo.com/2019/02/colors-launches-crime-legal-drama-courtroom-sacchai-haazir-ho/ https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/television/we-are-not-promoting-polygamy-through-kya-haal-mr-panchaal-producer-vipul-d-shah-4825192/ https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/girija-oak-boards-the-ladies-special/articleshow/65898816.cms https://www.indiatoday.in/television/what-s-hot/story/comedy-circus-coming-back-with-a-new-season-to-replace-family-time-with-kapil-sharma-1210676-2018-04-12 https://www.televisionpost.com/sony-sab-to-air-comedy-drama-super-sisters-from-6-aug/ https://www.indianprimebuzz.com/ladies-special-2-star-cast-real-name-season/ http://www.tellychakkar.com/tv/behind-the-lens/it-s-no-laughing-matter-content-poaching-and-comedy-circus — Preceding unsigned comment added by Movingframes ( talk • contribs) 10:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, StraussInTheHouse, thanks for examining my Draft:Transradio. It's my first attempt to add a completion to Wiki:en and so I made all mistakes, I could make, I think. Sorry for this. I only will ask you for deleting the draft after this, because the article now is updated... Many thanks and have a good day! -- OldfashionFreak ( talk) 06:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you and again sorry! -- OldfashionFreak ( talk) 16:51, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Dear StraussInTheHouse, thank you for reviewing my submission, it was 46 days ago. I have made amendment and resubmit, however the process tooks longer than I expected. Appreciate if you can review it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simpson goh ( talk • contribs) 09:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi StraussInTheHouse, we've been corresponding about the article on Apeiron. @ AngusWOOF: was also involved. It's been two months since the last review, and I'm wondering if there is a chance to review it any soon? If there is any more work to be done with this draft, please let me know. Cheers Jakub Dusza ( talk) 03:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Just a heads up: Someone un-archived your close at Talk:The Great Replacement and added a !vote. Station1 ( talk) 18:30, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
The Great Replacement conspiracy theory - I undid the close here, in retrospect I realize that may have screwed up some part of the process, so I apologize if that's not the proper approach, but I do think this was hasty. The move discussion was 6 days old. Four supported the move (counting the nominator), one contested, and others hadn't voted and were still discussing other options. I was in the process of adding a !vote against the move when you closed. Nblund talk 18:34, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, SITH: Thanks for reviewing my Lonnie McFadden page. Your comment says that the Early Life section needs inline citations. All the information from that paragraph is verifiable at the cited article. I'm not sure what to add. Can you give me a suggestion? Should I put that same reference throughout the paragraph, say, at the end of each sentence? Thanks AG Kansas City AG Kansas City ( talk) 03:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Draft:Lonnie_McFadden — Preceding unsigned comment added by AG Kansas City ( talk • contribs) 19:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi StraussInTheHouse, Thanks for reviewing the draft. I would like to ask about the reason for rejection – the mentioned reason is that "The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes". However, the draft includes footnotes. Could you let me know what actions need to be done regarding the inline citations? Thanks Romika64 ( talk) 15:53, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback, and you are right. (Just learning Wikipedia protocols for new pages.) I will make the changes to this language and resubmit. CANdo-artreview ( talk) 19:25, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear SITH. Sincere thanks for taking the time to review my draft. /info/en/?search=Draft:Digital_product_studio
In regards to reliable sources for Digital Product Studio, it's a chicken and egg situation. If you type in "Digital Product Studio" into Google you get pages and pages of results.
https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=%22digital+product+studio%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
and in the news section the phrase is mentioned over and over https://www.google.com/search?q=%22digital+product+studio%22&client=safari&rls=en&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjamPu7oMPhAhUrTt8KHQkDDHsQ_AUIESgE&biw=2015&bih=1150
So this industry model 100% exists. This is also why I am trying to write about them. I do not know how to solve the chicken and egg situation and would love your help in getting this draft over the line.
Deep thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ezyjules99 ( talk • contribs) 14:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Please see the input and conversation here /info/en/?search=Draft_talk:Harry_Gideonse#Comment, on your tagging an article and keeping it from being promoted. Thanks.-- 2604:2000:E010:1100:A066:E3A3:DD44:3FFC ( talk) 16:17, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi SITH
I see you rejected the Ningen Dock article and understand why - but I've (am not the original author) have been searching for information on Ningen Dock for weeks - and I can tell you the language barrier is farking real! It seems to be a ubiquitous topic in Japan and almost a secret everywhere else.
I was thinking - would references from an English medical journal like Lancet or BMJ be credible enough? Assuming I understood the problem - I'm new to wiki editing. Thanks - I.N. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Internautnotes ( talk • contribs) 10:24, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello SITH,
thank you for your constructive feedback on my "AGGRELIN" article. I have reviewed the parts that you have pointed out and I've rewritten them accordingly. I would be happy, if you could look into it once again and tell me what you think, before I send it in once more.
Many thanks, Honorandrespect ( talk) 10:15, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I'm confused.
You indicated that there were 2 blatant copyright violations in an article awaiting adoption. I do not understand how either of those are blatant copyright violations.
The article is Draft:Amy Wax
Sentence 1 which you said is a blatant copyright violation says "She worked as the Assistant to the Solicitor General in the Office of the Solicitor General at the U.S. Department of Justice in the late 1980s and early 1990s."
The words I bolded can't be copyright violations. They are her title, the office title, the department title, and the years.
The only words left are "She worked as the .. in the .. at the ... in the ... and." Can you explain how those words are a blatant copyright violation? I cannot imagine it.
Plus -- the first of the above words (which I've bolded) are not even in the supporting ref here. So that can't be a blatant copyright violation.
What we have left are the words "as .. in the .. at the .. in the .. and." Are you saying that is a copyright violation? Please point me to some policy that support that. I do not think it is true.
Or if you insist it is - can we please have and admin comment? Perhaps user:DGG? I see you are doing this a lot, and I wonder what effect it has on well intentioned editors who might be driven away from contributing. Copyright is important, but I do not understand you interpretation of it.
(The second sentence has similar issues .. "seven years" and "University of Virginia Law School" being in the ref and the text cannot be a basis for a "blatant copyright concern."). 2604:2000:E010:1100:34D4:FB55:EBA9:BA18 ( talk) 21:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello! My last submission of the draft was rejected for being highly promotional but that was fixed and the picture titled: "own picture" is taken by me in the office with a professional camera and uploaded manually on Wikimedia ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ziad_Hayek.jpg#filelinks). Today i cannot find my draft though I edited it yesterday. Could you please help me? Thank you NicoleKhaw ( talk) 09:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
A draft for an upcoming Assamese movie Ji Golpor Ses Nai was declined. The subject is the first anthology film of Northeast India which makes it a notable film. Many references have been given about the film. Kindly look into it. Prodyut Kumar Deka ( 164.100.149.245 ( talk) 11:25, 5 April 2019 (UTC)).
Prodyut Kumar Deka ( 164.100.149.245 ( talk) 06:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)).
Hi
thanks for replying to me. But I have no idea how to format or how to add an addition to my page - is there someone I can write to or message who can do it? I am not a tech person at all. These are the additions
I hope you are well and you can help. I have two very large changes to make to my Wiki site - or to add.
I have been named a 2019 Guggenheim Fellow (Non Fiction) announced today on Page A5 of the New York Times (I can also send the letter that told me I have received one) https://www.gf.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/New-York-Times-Ad-2019.pdf
and I am currently also a Senior Fellow at Yale University Jackson Institute for Global Affairs
http://jackson.yale.edu/person/janine-di-giovanni/
and a 2018 Edward R. Murrow Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations
Please can you add these? My page is locked so I can not do it
Thank you so much Janine di Giovanni — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janinedigi ( talk • contribs) 18:27, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
How do you suggest I improve my sources? I have 6 references in the "PhD Section and Research" and below included 22 "Key Publications" further expanding on his work in this area. Furthermore, how is this page I submitted any different than the following pages: Jim McKelvey, Herbert W. Virgin. James Watson, Francis Crick, Stephen Hawking. I look forward to receiving your response and improving this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RYANMICHAELMILLER ( talk • contribs) 00:22, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Interested in helping build this group nomination? Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal MFD Results/people Legacypac ( talk) 21:48, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
USE enwiki_p;
SELECT p.page_title
FROM page p
INNER JOIN category.cat_title ON <insert pseudotable>
WHERE
p.page_namespace = 100 AND c.cat_pages < 20
"Submission declined on 28 March 2019 by StraussInTheHouse (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources."
Dear Sir, we have recently noted that our article was declined by you. In order for clarification I would like to know which information was not accurately referenced. Since I am working in research for many years, proper referencing is my second nature and I would never publish anything that is not based on facts and proper peer-review. All publications underwent rigorous reviews and are state of the art. I would like to ask you how we can improve this current submission.
With best regards Hendrik Ankersmit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankersmit1 ( talk • contribs) 13:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
I had submitted a page on a company and i see that you have declined the approval since submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
In the mean time read the guidelines on organisation. Thanks
Thanks StraussInTheHouse for your feedback on the initial draft. Two questions:
You declined it stating that this submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Please clarify specifically which aspects of the sourcing are inadequate, to facilitate improving the draft:
- Is it the quality of the referenced sources for who won the awards? (The Guardian, The Times, etc) - Is it that the references are fine but don't appear in the right places in the article? - Which specific claims in the article are inadequately sourced? Claims about who won each of the awards? Claims about the amount or purpose of the award?
Also, the image of Arkhipov was removed as non-free-use, even though it is simply the same image that has for many years appeared in the Wikipedia article about Vasili Arkhipov, which contains copyright information suggesting that it is in fact usable for Wikipedia, so what exactly is the issue here?
Thanks in advance for clarifying and helping improve the article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikinator7 ( talk • contribs) 12:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
you rejected the article being published because you said soundcloud and twitter are not reliable sources but if you were to look at them and what they are referencing you will see that the soundcloud is for an interview that brad was in and the twitter sources were tweets made by organizations and people tweeting about brad and his movements so these sources are proving that the tweets we talked about are actually tweets. So if you look at these sources you will see that while they might not be considered reliable they are there to prove that the claims we have made are true — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smallman1093 ( talk • contribs) 13:28, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi SITH,
Draft:Audiodog is my first crack at creating a new article, and I used an existing article about another album by
the same artist,
Transformer, as a model for creating mine. You declined Audiodog for not meeting notability guidelines; can you help me understand whether/how the Transformer article does meet those guidelines while my draft does not? It seems thin on references as well (as does another related article,
Union). Have I chosen a bad example to emulate?
Thanks for your help,
Lardofdorkness (
talk)
18:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi StraussInTheHouse,
thank you for the suggestion on imporving my article. I aksed for help on the chat forum and hopefully got the article right this time. COuld you please let me know if I have to work on any more improvements?
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcela McLeod ( talk • contribs) 03:46, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Utrecht tram shooting. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. 182.239.117.54 ( talk) 04:49, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
I've gone through a few of your RD1 requests on drafts (which is appreciated, fwiw) and I've noticed a few of them where you declined based on copyright violations but you only removed a sentence or two (e.g. Draft:Horiyasu). A copyvio decline should really only be used if a vast majority of the text was removed and what's left after redaction isn't enough to demonstrate notability (such as Draft:Etta D. Pisano).
As a minor note, I've never seen it used like this but I don't think you need to use {{ redacted}} when you remove the text - it looked like a few users were confused by this and thought they were supposed to keep the template there. Primefac ( talk) 18:20, 14 April 2019 (UTC) (please do not ping on reply)
Draft:Imagine This Women's International Film Festival
Hello there, thank you for reviewing my draft. I'm a bit confused - but I did make changes to the page and kept the redaction. Would you mind taking another look and giving me advice if there are more improvements needed? Thank you!
Trish10876 ( talk) 00:01, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Good evening,
Youtube and Twitter are only two of the sources I have listed. If necessary, I will remove them and leave only the other, which include more reliable sites, like
sky.it and
genius.com, as well as Italian websites and online newspapers (not blogs). Sardinia Post e.g., one of the sites the pages links to in the section "Sources", is an Italian online newspaper based in Sardinia. I personally think that it could be enough, do you agree? Thanks for the attention. --
62.10.245.254 (
talk)
17:25, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Edit: I have just removed links to Youtube and Twitter. In the "References" and "Sources" section, all the information written in the article can be verified. Thanks again. --
62.10.245.254 (
talk)
17:31, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
The person is eminently suitable for a Wiki page. He is a very important historical and cultural figure
The problem is that the only sources available are sources in the Kurdish-Sorani language - a language which I do not read or understand.
That is the reason why the article needs to be posted in its present form, so that we can then build on it.
The other problem is that the verification data for the singer's activities is contained in the many YouTube clips of his performances.
But Wikipedia does not permit me to include YouTube clips.
In short... what do you suggest is the best way to proceed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed Emery 2015 ( talk • contribs)
Given how 1300 and 1100 odd and other smaller batches of portals can be bundled and deleted based on who made the same kind of pages and how, I found this close poor. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:T. E. Lawrence. When I renominated them one by one I was accused of flooding MFD and threatened with a topic ban from MFD. Perhaps the most efficent way is DRV? Had they been not already batched rhey would be in a bigger group nom and perhaps gone already. Legacypac ( talk) 12:41, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
I should clarify my view here.
Hope that helps. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 13:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi SITH, why exactly is Wikia/FANDOM not a trustable source? The wiki at that host I linked is the most used source for help for that game and also controlled every day by the admins, of which two have a very good contact with the developer and was already approved by him almost a year ago already. I have seen no wrong information there so far. If that host is just generally declined on wikipedia (for whatever reason), would it be ok then if I just remove all references as there is no other good source? Have a good day, -- 88.76.149.54 ( talk) 10:53, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Use Template:Other people for cases like this. – wbm1058 ( talk) 15:32, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I am trying to recover the text of Draft: Neurosexism, a draft article you declined on March 16 that has now been deleted. Can you help me with this? J.birch2 ( talk) 20:49, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello SITH, I added more sources as asked. Some of them are in italian, as the event take place in Italy. Despite this, I added a few references in english, like a festival review by an american magazine and a live album recorded at the festival. Thank you for your help, just let me know what else can be done. Sicurocanasta ( talk) 11:00, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
please review this action
17:14, 16 March 2019 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Sexual and Gender Minority Research Office (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of https://isgmh.northwestern.edu/2017/01/20/21st-century-cures-act-calls-for-expanded-nih-focus-on-sexual-and-gender-minority-health/, http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/DBASSE_191476.PDF) (thank)
I find the action taken above does not warrant a g12deletion.
I believe even with a copyright symbol at the bottom of a NATIONAL ACADEMIES website page, they are a government agency and therefore all content is public domain when published.
I also know that 95% of the cut and paste work from Northwestern University was the actual line by line text of the 21st Century Cures Act of 2016 which has its own wiki article but not any reference to the portions of this legislation I was including in my article.
THESE ARE SERIOUS WORDS WHERE THE LGBT COMMUNITY IS IDENTIFIED BY THE US GOVERNMENT AS A MINORITY POPULATION. You do cut and paste in such cases, so you are certain you did not leave anything out. Would you prefer I add this information from the National Register instead of a decent University.
I like your work and your user handle. Will you handle the BOTBOY's abusive deletion please and chastise them for not giving me sufficient time to tackle the issues you pointed out to a few hours ago.
Much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrphilip ( talk • contribs) 04:22, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
BOTBOY, the deleting administrator was RHaworth and you can leave a request on his talk page if you wish to have a copy sent to you. The deletion certainly wasn't abusive and I am in no position to either desire or have grounds to
chastiseanyone over this. Many thanks, SITH (talk) 12:06, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Esknyazeva ( talk) 12:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)I added links to all of the facts on the page G-Core Labs company Esknyazeva ( talk) 12:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)made information about the company more neutral Esknyazeva ( talk) 12:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)added big customers of our company with proof links to reliable sources (all our customers which I wrote about gave me a permission to write about them and our business relationship) Esknyazeva ( talk) 12:55, 21 March 2019 (UTC)page about G-Core Labs isn't an orphan page anymore, there are two links to the page: from page about [ [1]] and from the page of [ of Tanks] Please, look at our page once again and tell me how to avoid deletion.
Hi, I've resubmitted the page Draft:WebRatio. Can you please review again? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paolorivius ( talk • contribs) 15:59, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Hey, you recently rejected my Draft:J. Smoke Wallin article and I was curious about what I can do to improve the submission so it is accepted next time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanszalay ( talk • contribs) 18:27, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
There are some sources here, but none that I've seen seem actually to discuss this person in any depth or detail. What he says or is reported as having said contributes exactly nothing to a determination of his notability by Wikipedia standards.I am inclined to agree, have you considered whether Wallin passes WP:BIO? Many thanks, SITH (talk) 22:16, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi! Did I miss anything here? – if so, do please say! You seem to have a good eye for this stuff, and thanks for noticing problems with this one. However, it's my feeling that a page with several years of history and contributions from a number of different editors is (relatively) unlikely to be eligible for speedy, and listing at WP:CP is likely to be the better option in such cases. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 19:02, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
I am sorry that I copied and pasted text from the Minecraft Wiki and put it on the draft one on Wikipedia. However I am still learning the rules so ya.
MoMoCool2005 |
Talk•••
Contributions
19:16, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hey thanks so much for reviewing my submission and for providing feedback. Please forgive my limited knowledge as this is my first submission and entry point into this great community. I was wondering if you might help me understand what you've done. It looks like you deleted the beginning and redacted another part? I def didn't intend to violate any copyright but I do see that I might have used similar language that they did in the article that was cited...was that the mistake? Sorry again for the newb questions but any guidance is much appreciated! -- HIYAthatsmyshoe ( talk) 22:03, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks. I just fixed the lead sentence and published and somehow a ton of the other text from the article dropped off! I don't know how that would have happened. Could you possibly help me restore? I'd hate for it to be reviewed right now all messed up.-- HIYAthatsmyshoe ( talk) 22:59, 22 March 2019 (UTC) Dang someone reviewed while the content was down. Ugh can't believe that happened :( HIYAthatsmyshoe ( talk) 23:16, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Ok thanks @justlettersandnumbers that makes sense now. I did pull some of the bullet points from their website when RedAlert had asked me to talk about services they provide. I realize now that too was a dumb move. I will work on it I really do appreciate the help. And no I'm not connected or employed other than living in the triad and having attended events and seen stuff they do. Thought it would be a good topic to get my feet wet on wiki Im def learning a lot. -- HIYAthatsmyshoe ( talk) 23:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC) Or if you guys think prudent to scratch this and move on to trying a new topic I'm open to your guidance. Thanks again. -- HIYAthatsmyshoe ( talk) 23:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi SITH, Thank you for your suggestions for improvement of my draft. I can see from the Wiki guidelines that your criticisms are valid although I had thought that my subject matter was already supported by primary and some secondary sources. My style became rather verbose because most readers, even professional geologists may not be familiar with all of the inter-related concepts and evidence that need to be treated carefully and together to assist comprehension. This explains your impression of an essay rather than an encyclopaedia article. The fundamental observation of sedimentary isostasy was made by Darwin in his account of the Voyage of the Beagle, and many experienced geologists have touched on this difficult subject over the intervening 180 years. My submittal was an attempt to meet the challenge of thorough explanation head-on, as I have found no other encyclopaedia that attempts to clarify these concepts as an integrated whole. I should certainly appreciate any further guidance from you or other Wiki editors that might improve my draft. Geologician ( talk) 19:47, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
FYI, please see Template:Talk page of redirect#Usage, which tells us that talk pages should have content when this template is used. When a round-robin set of page moves results in deleting the original talk page, and you need to re-create that talk page, it is best to re-create it as a hard redirect as I've done at Talk:Aashish Chaudhary. This saves editors a click and takes them from their link to the correct page where the RM has been closed. Thank you! Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 16:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello SITH, thank you kindly for contacting me yesterday on the article about J-Subculture to point out about the deletion proposal. I have added an edit summary line for explanation today. If you could check it by occasion and consider it, I would much appreciate.
It was my first article and I tried to work it out carefully for format, references, inter-linkage with related articles etc., modelling it after similar Wiki articles. I'm aware that it may have consisted of deficiencies from the beginning, but always hoped others would help with contributions and improvements of content. It is an original text that I have created in person and put in research on the topic. The creation of the article took time & labor.
If the article is not deemed appropriate for the platform, I don't object the deletion per se, as I don't want to swim against stream. Nonetheless I would regret seeing all the labor & time invested disappear, so if you could advise what needs to be done to safe it and therewith could reconsider the proposal, I would be much obliged. Thank you very much for your time and guidance, greetings RockmanY RockmanY ( talk) 02:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Why did you close the discussion as no consensus? Hhkohh ( talk) 16:14, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi StraussInTheHouse. Thank you for your interest in copyright clean-up. I noticed that you have recently listed some drafts at WP:CP. Perhaps you didn't realize it, but whenever you list something there for investigation, you have to notify the person who added the content. There's a template for you to do this - please see the instructions on the copyvio core template. Then the user is supposed to have one week to address the issue before an administrator deals with the case. WP:CP is intended only for the most complex cases. For most cases, the preferred action is for you to remove the copyright material yourself, notify the user of the problem, and then request revision deletion. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 ( talk) 22:21, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello StraussInTheHouse,
Thank you for reviewing my article. I would like to ask about the reason for rejection and as far as I see the reason for deleting the text. As far as I have understood the problem is in the copyrighted content or too big citation that I have used from the source Al- Muttawa. But I used the reference marks and it looked alike a long citation. Now I would like to see the text, is it possible to reconstruct it? Daria Lebedieva ( talk) 17:41, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi StraussInTheHouse, I overturned the closure at this page, as I see there is continuing room for discussion. It was already a rather "close" consensus, if pressed I'd be leaning more on the side of "no consensus" then in support of the requester. I wanted to leave you a note in case my edit summaries were misleading, the additional listing is only for that reason, not because it was a "non-admin closure". I think there is room for more information, and left a specific question for one editor - would like to give them a chance to respond now. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 22:51, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
I see the Jan Peterson draft has been flagged for possible copyright violations, but a look at the Copyvio report shows that many of the flagged text sections are book titles, place names, organization names, and even dates. Not sure how these could be written any differently (?) Thanks VanIslander1234 ( talk) 18:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi StraussintheHouse, you recently reviewed my articlr submission on Dr. Elad I. Levy on February 4th, i have made the changes you requested, i cut the article down quite a bit and added in the references for the notable research contributions, and also added in references for his awards and recognition's section. I had resubmmited it and apparently there a two pending submissions for Levy. I would like the one titled "Elad I. Levy" reviewed not the one titled "Elad Levy" reviewed. I appreciate your help with this project, please let me know any other edits you would like made, another reviewer did review it and said they would review the one titled "Elad Levy" since it was a duplicate, but i made all the revisions based on your comments to Elad I. Levy". Please let me know any other advice you have for this page so that it can get accepted! thank you so much! Ashamkhan123 ( talk) 01:23, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I have been working on an article on photographer, Jason Thrasher. I submitted a draft but I may have confused things by putting the template in my sandbox. Thank you for the inline citation recommendation. They are in the draft. ( /info/en/?search=Draft:Jason_Thrasher)--I am not asking for special attention just making sure I complied with your suggestions. I am glad to wait my turn. Thank you for all you do to make this enterprise work. Kmccook ( talk) 02:46, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi I wanted to add the information about Georgian Architect-designer Amiran Patarkalashvili, He has his pages in social media and is the founder of CPA Central PArtnership Foundationa. Why did u decline my article? I don't understand what is the problem — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ninogogitidze18 ( talk • contribs) 10:25, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi SITH, I have resubmitted my Sedimentary isostasy draft after making a careful edit to address the concerns mentioned your first review, using Evolution wiki as a model. The range of vocabulary and concepts used in this model have been around even longer than those of Evolution, although they are less familiar to earth scientists. Therefore a Wiki linked approach to publication is indispensible if these related, well-established, concepts are to be considered in their proper context by peers.Thanks Geologician ( talk) 10:44, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
For taking the time to review the article on the Free Burghers. Bhistory 14:20, 28 March 2019 (UTC) |
Hello! I added links and further refined the article in the draft that You checked Draft:Anastasiya_Makarevich. Please check the new version. Also in the future I will improve the article. Savcheg ( talk) 09:21, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi Strauss, this is my first time working through the submission process. Can you please let me know what information I need to include inline citations for? Are inline citations the same thing as regular citations? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterMa1234 ( talk • contribs)
Thank you for taking the time to review my draft on the Free Burghers. The article is my first. In regard to the copy right violation on one of the items in the article, please accept my sincere apologies. Reason being purely lack of experience. Thank you for the correction thereof. Please accept my commitment to not repeat said again. Kind Regards Bhistory 14:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boershistory ( talk • contribs)
Hello StraussInTheHouse. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Jason Lewis, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Copyrighted text is mostly a list of books. The rest can be dealt with through revdel. Thank you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
You mentioned consensus in your edit summary. Can you please point me to the discussion? Thanks. - Paul T +/ C 21:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi SITH, Thank you for your confirmation of my article. I had read your comment about why my article was declined. May you give me some advices as how to preference "Reliable sources". I'm new in making contribution to Wiki so I must be made some mistake in preference it. About the article that I submitted for review, I translated it from another Wiki's page, and Im a native and used to do what was wrote in the article so I can verified what in it was true. I'd glad to making more attribution to Wiki if you can help me on how to improve my article. Thank you. 113.161.84.98 ( talk) 13:47, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
I created a draft for 'Baaghi 3', which is the third part in the 'Baaghi' franchise. This was declined. The filming and release of this film is imminent. At what point should I revive the draft and resubmit? The lead actor, Tiger Shroff is one of India's biggest stars and the last film 'Baaghi 2' collected about 259 crore rupees or approximately $35 million. So, it is a notable film. Maybe not enough has been published in the media yet. /info/en/?search=Baaghi_2 /info/en/?search=Tiger_Shroff — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomas t5 ( talk • contribs) 16:41, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
I assume that you mean that you are losing the assumption of good faith with regard to the portal creator that you expressed in your comment on the Arbitration request. Yes. That's why Aaaa applies. That refers to the 880-hertz A tone that was stuck in the brain or ear of Robert Schumann, but also the annoyance that I am getting at the damm portals. With Schumann, the Aaaa eventually caused him to pass through the portal to the next world. Robert McClenon ( talk) 18:42, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, you've just reviewed my page but I don't know how I could fix it and make it better? You wrote this: Symbol opinion vote.svg Comment: Relies too heavily on SPS / CORPSPAM sources. What does that mean? How can I make my sources better? I've already inputted 27 of them, so I feel like that shows coverage and they're all either from respectable news sources or It sites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.147.97.136 ( talk) 14:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Draft:WEB_Marketing_(company) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.147.97.136 ( talk) 07:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Sir, you declined my draft stating that introduction is appearing more like an advertisement. This is the link sir - Draft:OPEN_Community
Sir, i have just stated the aims and motives of community. There is no other way they can be stated. I have not stated anything in favour of community.With due respect sir, i think stating the aims isn't advertising. Also, stating the aims is crucial so that people can know what our community is aiming to do. This is for informational purpose. I request you to accept my draft submission .
thank you sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ManushiKapoor ( talk • contribs) 05:49, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
enrichmentand
innovative, just describe it and say (but don't copy) what reliable sources say about it. SITH (talk) 13:54, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear Sir, I tried to create the article for writer and producer VIpul D shah. i have also put a lot of references but i got a message This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article.
sir i have so many articles about him but still it doesn't qualify. what should i do
https://www.mumbailive.com/en/television/colors-tv-launches-season-3-rising-star-33960 https://www.mid-day.com/articles/indias-first-live-interactive-show-on-television-comes-alive/20565191 https://www.iwmbuzz.com/television/personalities/beautiful-journey-kya-haal-mr-paanchal-enjoyed-making-producer-vipul-d-shah/2018/12/22 https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/Copying-Kapil-will-only-bring-us-criticism-Optimystixs-producer-Vipul-D-Shah/articleshow/50653788.cms https://www.mumbailive.com/en/television/colors-announces-courtroom-sacchai-haazir-ho-swara-bhaskar-32924 https://bestmediainfo.com/2019/02/colors-launches-crime-legal-drama-courtroom-sacchai-haazir-ho/ https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/television/we-are-not-promoting-polygamy-through-kya-haal-mr-panchaal-producer-vipul-d-shah-4825192/ https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/girija-oak-boards-the-ladies-special/articleshow/65898816.cms https://www.indiatoday.in/television/what-s-hot/story/comedy-circus-coming-back-with-a-new-season-to-replace-family-time-with-kapil-sharma-1210676-2018-04-12 https://www.televisionpost.com/sony-sab-to-air-comedy-drama-super-sisters-from-6-aug/ https://www.indianprimebuzz.com/ladies-special-2-star-cast-real-name-season/ http://www.tellychakkar.com/tv/behind-the-lens/it-s-no-laughing-matter-content-poaching-and-comedy-circus — Preceding unsigned comment added by Movingframes ( talk • contribs) 10:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, StraussInTheHouse, thanks for examining my Draft:Transradio. It's my first attempt to add a completion to Wiki:en and so I made all mistakes, I could make, I think. Sorry for this. I only will ask you for deleting the draft after this, because the article now is updated... Many thanks and have a good day! -- OldfashionFreak ( talk) 06:41, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Thank you and again sorry! -- OldfashionFreak ( talk) 16:51, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Dear StraussInTheHouse, thank you for reviewing my submission, it was 46 days ago. I have made amendment and resubmit, however the process tooks longer than I expected. Appreciate if you can review it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simpson goh ( talk • contribs) 09:17, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi StraussInTheHouse, we've been corresponding about the article on Apeiron. @ AngusWOOF: was also involved. It's been two months since the last review, and I'm wondering if there is a chance to review it any soon? If there is any more work to be done with this draft, please let me know. Cheers Jakub Dusza ( talk) 03:05, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Just a heads up: Someone un-archived your close at Talk:The Great Replacement and added a !vote. Station1 ( talk) 18:30, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
The Great Replacement conspiracy theory - I undid the close here, in retrospect I realize that may have screwed up some part of the process, so I apologize if that's not the proper approach, but I do think this was hasty. The move discussion was 6 days old. Four supported the move (counting the nominator), one contested, and others hadn't voted and were still discussing other options. I was in the process of adding a !vote against the move when you closed. Nblund talk 18:34, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi, SITH: Thanks for reviewing my Lonnie McFadden page. Your comment says that the Early Life section needs inline citations. All the information from that paragraph is verifiable at the cited article. I'm not sure what to add. Can you give me a suggestion? Should I put that same reference throughout the paragraph, say, at the end of each sentence? Thanks AG Kansas City AG Kansas City ( talk) 03:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Draft:Lonnie_McFadden — Preceding unsigned comment added by AG Kansas City ( talk • contribs) 19:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi StraussInTheHouse, Thanks for reviewing the draft. I would like to ask about the reason for rejection – the mentioned reason is that "The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes". However, the draft includes footnotes. Could you let me know what actions need to be done regarding the inline citations? Thanks Romika64 ( talk) 15:53, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback, and you are right. (Just learning Wikipedia protocols for new pages.) I will make the changes to this language and resubmit. CANdo-artreview ( talk) 19:25, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear SITH. Sincere thanks for taking the time to review my draft. /info/en/?search=Draft:Digital_product_studio
In regards to reliable sources for Digital Product Studio, it's a chicken and egg situation. If you type in "Digital Product Studio" into Google you get pages and pages of results.
https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=%22digital+product+studio%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
and in the news section the phrase is mentioned over and over https://www.google.com/search?q=%22digital+product+studio%22&client=safari&rls=en&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjamPu7oMPhAhUrTt8KHQkDDHsQ_AUIESgE&biw=2015&bih=1150
So this industry model 100% exists. This is also why I am trying to write about them. I do not know how to solve the chicken and egg situation and would love your help in getting this draft over the line.
Deep thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ezyjules99 ( talk • contribs) 14:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Please see the input and conversation here /info/en/?search=Draft_talk:Harry_Gideonse#Comment, on your tagging an article and keeping it from being promoted. Thanks.-- 2604:2000:E010:1100:A066:E3A3:DD44:3FFC ( talk) 16:17, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi SITH
I see you rejected the Ningen Dock article and understand why - but I've (am not the original author) have been searching for information on Ningen Dock for weeks - and I can tell you the language barrier is farking real! It seems to be a ubiquitous topic in Japan and almost a secret everywhere else.
I was thinking - would references from an English medical journal like Lancet or BMJ be credible enough? Assuming I understood the problem - I'm new to wiki editing. Thanks - I.N. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Internautnotes ( talk • contribs) 10:24, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello SITH,
thank you for your constructive feedback on my "AGGRELIN" article. I have reviewed the parts that you have pointed out and I've rewritten them accordingly. I would be happy, if you could look into it once again and tell me what you think, before I send it in once more.
Many thanks, Honorandrespect ( talk) 10:15, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi. I'm confused.
You indicated that there were 2 blatant copyright violations in an article awaiting adoption. I do not understand how either of those are blatant copyright violations.
The article is Draft:Amy Wax
Sentence 1 which you said is a blatant copyright violation says "She worked as the Assistant to the Solicitor General in the Office of the Solicitor General at the U.S. Department of Justice in the late 1980s and early 1990s."
The words I bolded can't be copyright violations. They are her title, the office title, the department title, and the years.
The only words left are "She worked as the .. in the .. at the ... in the ... and." Can you explain how those words are a blatant copyright violation? I cannot imagine it.
Plus -- the first of the above words (which I've bolded) are not even in the supporting ref here. So that can't be a blatant copyright violation.
What we have left are the words "as .. in the .. at the .. in the .. and." Are you saying that is a copyright violation? Please point me to some policy that support that. I do not think it is true.
Or if you insist it is - can we please have and admin comment? Perhaps user:DGG? I see you are doing this a lot, and I wonder what effect it has on well intentioned editors who might be driven away from contributing. Copyright is important, but I do not understand you interpretation of it.
(The second sentence has similar issues .. "seven years" and "University of Virginia Law School" being in the ref and the text cannot be a basis for a "blatant copyright concern."). 2604:2000:E010:1100:34D4:FB55:EBA9:BA18 ( talk) 21:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Hello! My last submission of the draft was rejected for being highly promotional but that was fixed and the picture titled: "own picture" is taken by me in the office with a professional camera and uploaded manually on Wikimedia ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ziad_Hayek.jpg#filelinks). Today i cannot find my draft though I edited it yesterday. Could you please help me? Thank you NicoleKhaw ( talk) 09:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
A draft for an upcoming Assamese movie Ji Golpor Ses Nai was declined. The subject is the first anthology film of Northeast India which makes it a notable film. Many references have been given about the film. Kindly look into it. Prodyut Kumar Deka ( 164.100.149.245 ( talk) 11:25, 5 April 2019 (UTC)).
Prodyut Kumar Deka ( 164.100.149.245 ( talk) 06:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)).
Hi
thanks for replying to me. But I have no idea how to format or how to add an addition to my page - is there someone I can write to or message who can do it? I am not a tech person at all. These are the additions
I hope you are well and you can help. I have two very large changes to make to my Wiki site - or to add.
I have been named a 2019 Guggenheim Fellow (Non Fiction) announced today on Page A5 of the New York Times (I can also send the letter that told me I have received one) https://www.gf.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/New-York-Times-Ad-2019.pdf
and I am currently also a Senior Fellow at Yale University Jackson Institute for Global Affairs
http://jackson.yale.edu/person/janine-di-giovanni/
and a 2018 Edward R. Murrow Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations
Please can you add these? My page is locked so I can not do it
Thank you so much Janine di Giovanni — Preceding unsigned comment added by Janinedigi ( talk • contribs) 18:27, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
How do you suggest I improve my sources? I have 6 references in the "PhD Section and Research" and below included 22 "Key Publications" further expanding on his work in this area. Furthermore, how is this page I submitted any different than the following pages: Jim McKelvey, Herbert W. Virgin. James Watson, Francis Crick, Stephen Hawking. I look forward to receiving your response and improving this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RYANMICHAELMILLER ( talk • contribs) 00:22, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Interested in helping build this group nomination? Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal MFD Results/people Legacypac ( talk) 21:48, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
USE enwiki_p;
SELECT p.page_title
FROM page p
INNER JOIN category.cat_title ON <insert pseudotable>
WHERE
p.page_namespace = 100 AND c.cat_pages < 20
"Submission declined on 28 March 2019 by StraussInTheHouse (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources."
Dear Sir, we have recently noted that our article was declined by you. In order for clarification I would like to know which information was not accurately referenced. Since I am working in research for many years, proper referencing is my second nature and I would never publish anything that is not based on facts and proper peer-review. All publications underwent rigorous reviews and are state of the art. I would like to ask you how we can improve this current submission.
With best regards Hendrik Ankersmit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankersmit1 ( talk • contribs) 13:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
I had submitted a page on a company and i see that you have declined the approval since submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
In the mean time read the guidelines on organisation. Thanks
Thanks StraussInTheHouse for your feedback on the initial draft. Two questions:
You declined it stating that this submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Please clarify specifically which aspects of the sourcing are inadequate, to facilitate improving the draft:
- Is it the quality of the referenced sources for who won the awards? (The Guardian, The Times, etc) - Is it that the references are fine but don't appear in the right places in the article? - Which specific claims in the article are inadequately sourced? Claims about who won each of the awards? Claims about the amount or purpose of the award?
Also, the image of Arkhipov was removed as non-free-use, even though it is simply the same image that has for many years appeared in the Wikipedia article about Vasili Arkhipov, which contains copyright information suggesting that it is in fact usable for Wikipedia, so what exactly is the issue here?
Thanks in advance for clarifying and helping improve the article! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikinator7 ( talk • contribs) 12:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
you rejected the article being published because you said soundcloud and twitter are not reliable sources but if you were to look at them and what they are referencing you will see that the soundcloud is for an interview that brad was in and the twitter sources were tweets made by organizations and people tweeting about brad and his movements so these sources are proving that the tweets we talked about are actually tweets. So if you look at these sources you will see that while they might not be considered reliable they are there to prove that the claims we have made are true — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smallman1093 ( talk • contribs) 13:28, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi SITH,
Draft:Audiodog is my first crack at creating a new article, and I used an existing article about another album by
the same artist,
Transformer, as a model for creating mine. You declined Audiodog for not meeting notability guidelines; can you help me understand whether/how the Transformer article does meet those guidelines while my draft does not? It seems thin on references as well (as does another related article,
Union). Have I chosen a bad example to emulate?
Thanks for your help,
Lardofdorkness (
talk)
18:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi StraussInTheHouse,
thank you for the suggestion on imporving my article. I aksed for help on the chat forum and hopefully got the article right this time. COuld you please let me know if I have to work on any more improvements?
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcela McLeod ( talk • contribs) 03:46, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Utrecht tram shooting. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. 182.239.117.54 ( talk) 04:49, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
I've gone through a few of your RD1 requests on drafts (which is appreciated, fwiw) and I've noticed a few of them where you declined based on copyright violations but you only removed a sentence or two (e.g. Draft:Horiyasu). A copyvio decline should really only be used if a vast majority of the text was removed and what's left after redaction isn't enough to demonstrate notability (such as Draft:Etta D. Pisano).
As a minor note, I've never seen it used like this but I don't think you need to use {{ redacted}} when you remove the text - it looked like a few users were confused by this and thought they were supposed to keep the template there. Primefac ( talk) 18:20, 14 April 2019 (UTC) (please do not ping on reply)
Draft:Imagine This Women's International Film Festival
Hello there, thank you for reviewing my draft. I'm a bit confused - but I did make changes to the page and kept the redaction. Would you mind taking another look and giving me advice if there are more improvements needed? Thank you!
Trish10876 ( talk) 00:01, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Good evening,
Youtube and Twitter are only two of the sources I have listed. If necessary, I will remove them and leave only the other, which include more reliable sites, like
sky.it and
genius.com, as well as Italian websites and online newspapers (not blogs). Sardinia Post e.g., one of the sites the pages links to in the section "Sources", is an Italian online newspaper based in Sardinia. I personally think that it could be enough, do you agree? Thanks for the attention. --
62.10.245.254 (
talk)
17:25, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Edit: I have just removed links to Youtube and Twitter. In the "References" and "Sources" section, all the information written in the article can be verified. Thanks again. --
62.10.245.254 (
talk)
17:31, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
The person is eminently suitable for a Wiki page. He is a very important historical and cultural figure
The problem is that the only sources available are sources in the Kurdish-Sorani language - a language which I do not read or understand.
That is the reason why the article needs to be posted in its present form, so that we can then build on it.
The other problem is that the verification data for the singer's activities is contained in the many YouTube clips of his performances.
But Wikipedia does not permit me to include YouTube clips.
In short... what do you suggest is the best way to proceed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ed Emery 2015 ( talk • contribs)
Given how 1300 and 1100 odd and other smaller batches of portals can be bundled and deleted based on who made the same kind of pages and how, I found this close poor. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:T. E. Lawrence. When I renominated them one by one I was accused of flooding MFD and threatened with a topic ban from MFD. Perhaps the most efficent way is DRV? Had they been not already batched rhey would be in a bigger group nom and perhaps gone already. Legacypac ( talk) 12:41, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
I should clarify my view here.
Hope that helps. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • ( contribs) 13:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi SITH, why exactly is Wikia/FANDOM not a trustable source? The wiki at that host I linked is the most used source for help for that game and also controlled every day by the admins, of which two have a very good contact with the developer and was already approved by him almost a year ago already. I have seen no wrong information there so far. If that host is just generally declined on wikipedia (for whatever reason), would it be ok then if I just remove all references as there is no other good source? Have a good day, -- 88.76.149.54 ( talk) 10:53, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Use Template:Other people for cases like this. – wbm1058 ( talk) 15:32, 15 April 2019 (UTC)