![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I’m a little bit confused. Why did you remove the category on the redirect of The Lorax Singers? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 06:28, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Oh. I wasn’t saying it was notable. I didn’t know the category was fake. But the reason the redirect exists is probably cause they have several streams of their songs on Spotify. That isn’t notable, though, so I guess there is no reason. You are right about how there is no band mention in the page it redirects to. It could redirect to the Soundtrack section, because that’s close, as a lot of the songs on iTunes often say “(feat. The Lorax Singers)” but it dosen’t say that on the articles. So it probably should be deleted. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 09:04, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
For your revert on the redirect of Bing Bong Zoo, I understand what you mean. I didn’t know that redirects didn’t have that. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 09:05, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Music Barnstar | |
In recognition of your 8 January 2020 assistance with the
Sports (Huey Lewis and the News album) article, and your ongoing
contributions to the many music articles and categories on Wikipedia, I hereby confer upon you a
barnstar. Thank you for all that you do. Christopher, Sheridan, OR ( talk) 05:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC) |
This Barnstar award was placed on your talk page due to permanent red-linked user page, per your request.
With an {{Archive box}} in place, please feel free to move this award as you see fit.
Christopher, Sheridan, OR (
talk)
05:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Can you please indicate the areas which you feel require references on the article All Aboard the Skylark for you to remove the refimprove tag that you added. 86.177.106.70 ( talk) 20:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Thankyou for the edits you've made on All That Jazz (Breathe album) and related pages. I appreciate your guidance. Is there anyway I can ask you a couple of specific style-related questions? ICT7 ( talk) 10:31, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Category:Robotboy characters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TTN ( talk) 18:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
I know why you made this edit but if you're planning on making more, I'd like to give a friendly suggestion to explain why in the edit summary, as not everyone knows that they editorial staff of AMG give out the star ratings and not the reviewers. Alternately, you could of course reword it but that's more overhead. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 01:16, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi There I'm Just Letting You Know That An User Called User talk:188.148.203.46 Messed Up The Tracks On Thriller 25. When I Went To Look At The Article The Track listing Is Weird. I'm Not Sure How To Fixed It. Thanks From JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 4:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
The corresponding photo of Monty Python is categorized under Monty Python. Why do you think this is improper? JustinTime55 ( talk) 15:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Is there any specific section that you think needs sources? I can take a look then. The Banner talk 18:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bow Wow's Untitled Seventh Studio album. Since you had some involvement with the Bow Wow's Untitled Seventh Studio album redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC 678 19:09, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanx for correcting my misnaming Snarky Puppy's live album. I have to ask, though, why did you put in a redirect page rather than just correcting the name on the Snarky Puppy page? I did so and tagged the redirect for speedy deletion. GWFrog ( talk) 21:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
I Need Some Help On The Very Best of Kiss I Try To Upload A New AllMusic Review, Rolling Stone Review And Sputnikmusic And Its Looks Weird. Can You Please Fixed The Review. Thanks From JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 7:14, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Always good seeing your name pop up in page history again :) Thanks again for reviewing Don't Cry For No Hipster and your other jazz article work. RubenSchade ( talk) 01:32, 21 April 2020 (UTC) |
Hello. For the record, I had to move Atkins (album) to a separate draft article for it. I am currently looking for sources about the album. Thanks. -- TheLennyGriffinFan1994 ( talk) 22:11, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
E.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=To_Memphis%2C_with_Love&type=revision&diff=952949149&oldid=866330266 Why are you removing the categories when you redirect these album articles? ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:04, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
Never mind i did fixed it. Can you please add disc 2 track listings? and the running time is 1:18:50 for disc 2 for the 40 (Foreigner album)
Thanks From JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 8:28 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Whats with you removing all of the chart information I added to It's a Jungle? You know how long it took me to find, organize, and cite all of that? The info lasted for a little over a month before you somehow found the dead page and removed it because "no radio station charts". I figured given that the song had an MTV music video created for it (for some reason you also removed the MTV part from the page) that got lots of screenplay it had to have been a hit even though Billboard's Hot 100 wrote it off. I sought out to find some charts and turned out to be correct, so I figured I'd add them to the page. But nope, for some reason adding airplay charts for singles is not allowed according to you. Trying to be helpful by adding new information to the site is a bad thing. All those hours I spent searching for that stuff and formatting it correctly into charts went down the drain. You also removed some of my citations because they apparently weren't reliable, and added Citation Needed in a few spots. The information there is factual, and it isn't my fault that the only way to prove it is through an eBay listing. Like I said, I searched for many hours and that just turned out to be the only source for the info. I highly doubt you know anything deep about Three Dog Night's history, and you've even had the audacity to make many nonsensical/useless edits on other articles about the band.
Just curious about your thought process and reasoning. Tine Crine ( talk) 01:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
A user called User talk:JJMC89 have been removing the album cover from a Wikipedia page called Look of Love: The Very Best of ABC he keeps on removing the album cover. I'm not sure what to do, he could be a bot.
Thanks from JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 9:57 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi – would you mind taking a quick look at this category and fixing the entry, please? It should be a filename, rather than a picture, but I can't see how to correct this. Thanks. Richard3120 ( talk) 15:46, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
[1] clearly is showing this. I have removed the images, with the explanation that they are not added to the article until the year is complete ( [2]). Though I don't know about any specific guideline to this effect, I am remembering this from past years and wanting to respect it. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 15:46, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
I've stated my views on the template at TfD... the creator has also created a category for those draft albums at Category:The Vinyls albums... can this be speedily deleted? Richard3120 ( talk) 20:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
When I import The Jam Gold CD to Itunes, the CD lookup results comes up with two options saying The Sound of the Jam and Gold. Is iTunes right about The Sound of The Jam and Gold are both the same albums or is the CD lookup results from iTunes are wrong? I'm just wondering because i notice some albums have been re-issued as Gold. Is it possible to add the Gold information back to The Sound of the Jam or not?
Thanks from JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 3:11 17 May 2020 (UTC)
@Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Thanks for your comment and about the iTunes lookup results I mentioned above. From JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 4:08 May 2020 (UTC)
Good afternoon Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
When I import The Jam Gold CD to Itunes, the CD lookup results comes up with two options saying The Sound of the Jam and Gold. Is iTunes right about The Sound of The Jam and Gold are both the same albums or is the CD lookup results from iTunes are wrong?
JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 12:39 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Is this where you were trying to get to with these two redirects? I had the pageswap reversed. Not sure why it was done in the first place, possibly a mistake and some crossed wires. Villain (Album) could possibly be deleted entirely, it adds nothing. Lithopsian ( talk) 20:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi User:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, I think Talk:Waitin' for the Bus / Jesus Just Left Chicago might also need a redirect? Thanks. Martinevans123 ( talk) 20:56, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Good Afternoon Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
I'm just wondering if I can add disc 2 to The Sound of the Jam because it's been mentioned on the article. I just wanted to check with you to see if that is okay before i add the second disc with the track listings?
Thanks so much from JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 9:43 21 May 2020 (UTC)
JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 9:05 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Can you please clarify why you are continually removing the category, "Country albums by American artists" from album pages? ChrisTofu11961 ( talk) 15:06, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do not remove {{ LR}} tag from Recover (The Naked and Famous album) until the issue is resolved. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 17:27, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my copy and paste error. As you may see from my edits, I'm trying to do a lot of things at once. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 23:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
What I would argue is this. The articles for charts in 1988 it seems have been deleted because the charts were not compiled by the Official Charts Company (OCC). However, what I would say is this: As an example, the The Official Big Top 40 is not compiled by the Official Charts Company, and therefore having the word "official" in the company name is by no means proof of de facto officiality, although OCC is clearly universally accepted as such by most people. Secondly, the deleted charts of 1988 were in fact compiled by the now defunct MRIB, who, were a rival to OCC (at the time called Gallup and then CIN) and were considered of equal importance and reliability to OCC. The OCC chart just so happened to be used by BBC Radio 1 and the now defunct Top of the Pops TV show. Pretty much every other TV and radio show of the day used the MRIB compiled singles chart. This may cause problems given that OCC is universally accepted as the "official" chart provider of the UK, however, I think on Wikipedia we have the opportunity to look into things in more detail and be more accurate. Also, I don't think OCC were compiling any rock or dance charts at this time, so MRIB's seem to be the accredited charts for them at the time. Cheers. QuintusPetillius ( talk) 13:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 1988. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. QuintusPetillius ( talk) 13:59, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Dear Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars/Archive 11,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 19:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi – following the discussion regarding the reorganization of Billboard's Rock and Alternative Songs charts, the query has come up at Wikipedia talk:Record charts#Billboard charts - Albums as to whether the same applies to albums in these categories... the current documentation only accounts for R&B/Hip Hop album charts. Can you shed any light on this? Thanks. Richard3120 ( talk) 23:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Hey there, you probably should have mentioned that in the CFD. I think your rationale is reasonable although I don't think I've really seen it spelled out that way. Perhaps you'd want to propose a clearer delineation for film vs. film series at WT:CFD, perhaps as an WP:RFC? I think this might be a discussion about a wider naming guideline. If you feel like I have misrepresented the consensus and closed erroneously in the Sandlot discussion specifically, you're more than welcome to make a listing at WP:MR. Cheers, bibliomaniac 1 5 00:43, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I was just wondering why you reverted back the proposed deletion template on the [[ talk page of List of Canadian Hot 100 top 10 singles in 2020? It has valid information, reliable sources, and has been going strong for 8 months of the Billboard chart year. I would hate to see all its progress be gone. I thought everything was clear to be taken off, since I explained my objection on my user talk page and edit summary of the article. Is there more that has to be done to prevent it from getting deleted? Just a little confused, that's all. Thanks. ( Purplehaze45 ( talk) 18:37, 4 August 2020 (UTC))
I was looking for where you proposed making the kind of change that you have already made for the 1960 and 1961 lists, and found it here (for reference). In the 1960 one, I made a suggestion to indicate which songs listed under the first issue date of that year initially made the top 10 prior to that first week ... just a simple footnote attached at the end of each song title which would be found in the preceding year's list (near the end, if we were to make the same changes to the 1959 list). I was scratching my head as to whether to do this for titles near the end of the year that continued their run in the top 10 into the next, but decided to not do that for now.
In your initial proposal here, you wanted to remove the "weeks in the top ten" column, but I saw you didn't do that in the changes you recently made to 1960/1961 (at least for now). While you did cite WP:CHARTTRAJ, and I have mixed feelings about its inclusion or exclusion (I do have one Joel Whitburn book that can back these tallies, thru 2011, but I don't mind either way), it's probably something that editors may try to keep adding back if we do exclude the column ... especially on the current lists ... even though it goes against CHARTTRAJ, so we'd have to be even extra vigilant about that.
Even making the change to have everything in just one table for the current list, and focused squarely on the year identified in the title of the list, would cause some editors to revert it back to the multiple table appearance there is now. (I do recall recently making a bold change to the "Notes" structure in the 2020 list, using the {{ efn}} and {{ notelist}} templates [3] [4] [5] [6], so that it would be easier to see the note right by the song or artist in question instead of having to scroll down the article every time, but one editor decided against it [7], and I decided not to push the issue any further.) I think it's a good idea to limit the scope, and having the one table, but having a talk page discussion at the current article might not hurt to see where the other editors in the project are on this. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 18:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Anyway, I took a stab at your update to 1960 and 1961 by applying that to the 1958 and 1959 articles. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 16:56, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
An IP has objected to your/my changes at the 1960 article [8]. I have reverted it for now; it's sounding like there could be more objections to this revised format, despite violations of WP:IINFO that you have brought up. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 15:45, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Same at 1961 [9]. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 15:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello, @ Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, thank you so much for correcting my edits, also if you don't mind helping getting the article Gabi DeMartino edits back, they don't want to add info for her because she's a member of duo Niki and Gabi, but DeMartino also releases solo projects, other group members has there own articles even when they don't do solo projects but still have articles, i still don't understand why, thanks! Gabriella Grande ( talk) 03:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
You said "Charting doesn't make these notable," could you ellaborate on that? Is this the reason nobody has updated these pages for 5 years? I am very frustrated and confused.
Trevortnidesserped ( talk) 22:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Hey Starcheers and @ Richard3120: I noticed you'd both edited a number of this editor's recent articles. I took a look earlier, and this editor's sheer output of articles on non-notable albums is staggering. I raised this on their talk page, pointing them to WP:NALBUMS, but they appear to have no other defence for their articles than "they are notable", and I doubt they're willing to change their tune or halt this prolific number of articles they pump out daily. Could either one of you start an ANI thread to bring further attention to this? (As I'm still "semi-retired", I'm sure why I'm concerned or starting an ANI thread would be questioned.) I don't believe it would gather much traction at any music WikiProject, as none of those are as active as the attention to this editor's back catalogue of non-notable albums warrants. This has been going on for God knows how many months or years now, and the hundreds or thousands of articles of this editor's created articles to trawl through and assess for notability needs all the attention it can get. I don't believe I or any one or two editors could get through to this editor on stopping this practice either. Thanks! Ss 112 07:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, hope you're fine. I want to create a template named ' Template:Educational boards in Pakistan' from this article List of educational boards in Pakistan. Is it right to create such a template? Thank you. Empire AS Talk! 07:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for this edit. I didn't take a look at the template's usage guidelines prior to publishing the edit, I was using the top of this page as a guide. I'll be careful to do more research next time round. Appreciate you letting me know. Sean Stephens ( talk) 13:29, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi. I don't understand why you feel it necessary to move these mathematics categories (e.g. Category:Draft-Class mathematics pages) to their new names. These categories have insignificant editing history and I have already created the new ones. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 14:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Did you mean to tag for deletion all of these mathematical article categories that are full of pages (see Category:Candidates for uncontroversial speedy deletion)? Liz Read! Talk! 19:59, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I have a question about your deletion of the So Fresh: The Hits of Autumn 2013 page (and redirect to the main So Fresh list). While I understand the premise of there being no significant coverage, I have recently had an article approved through the AfC process which was basically in the same format and many of the individual So Fresh album pages have similar limited information on them. Given the approval of the article through the AfC process, I assumed it would be okay to continue in that vein.
Basically it would be great if you could explain the inconsistency in treatment between album pages? The reason why I started making the pages is because I was looking up So Fresh albums on Wikipedia out of curiosity and all the red links on the So Fresh list made me sad so I wanted to rectify it. If any album page I make is going to be redirected to the main list anyway, then I see no point in having all the red links? I'm not going to die on this hill or anything but to me it does seem misleading to have red links on the list page, but when a user makes a page (in keeping with the format of the other preceding albums), that the page is effectively deleted.
Thanks in advance. -- L84tea ( talk) 02:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates § Naming of navbox categories. — andrybak ( talk) 14:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
I see your name a lot around Wikipedia and there are many edits you have made that I appreciate, so thank you for those. There are currently discussions going on about whether the Britney Spears albums ...Baby One More Time and Oops!... I Did It Again should be moved:
I'd love for you to voice your opinion there. Thank you.
Thank you for your cleanup efforts on the Kitty Wells albums. With respect to Kitty Wells' & Red Foley's Golden Favorites, I have tended not to include compilation albums but made an exception for this one, as it is the only album to my knowledge which collected all of their charting singles from the 1950s. Also, it's my understanding that the compilation charted as an album on its own. While I own Whitburn's "The Billboard Book of Top 40 Country Hits", I seem to have misplaced my copy of "Joel Whitburn Presents Hot Country Albums". Do you happen to know of a reliable online source to confirm chart performance of country albums of the 1960s? Thanks for any help you may be able to provide. Cbl62 ( talk) 23:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
I noticed your edit summary ( here) on Sands of Gold stating that the named reviewers don't assign the "AllMusic Rating" to the albums. If the reviewer doesn't give the rating, who does? User Ratings are separate, and so I assumed the official "AllMusic Rating" was by the reviewer. Is there documentation of this somewhere on the AllMusic site? Thanks for your input. Cbl62 ( talk)
I noticed you moved " In the Jailhouse Now (1982 album)" to " In the Jailhouse Now (album)". I started the article with the secondary disambiguation due to the existence of other albums (including other Webb Pierce albums) with the same title. E.g., here, here, here, here, here, and here. Is it not typical practice for albums to use secondary disambiguation when other albums exist with the same title? Cbl62 ( talk) 02:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Best Selection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Best Selection. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Good morning, I'd like to ask if you can check Treat Myself (Victoria Justice song) and see if the page still needs the notability tag. Thanks 151.40.228.74 ( talk) 10:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
★Trekker (
talk) is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec16a}}~~~~ to your friends' talk pages.
★Trekker ( talk) 17:41, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
You are the only editor I have seen take issue with or misconstrue this caption. "Weekly chart performance" is perfectly apt—it means performance on charts that are issued weekly. If it meant "week-by-week", like a chart trajectory, the caption would say "week-by-week". Besides, if it weren't already clear, there is always a column below the caption saying "peak position" on those weekly charts. I just don't see how weekly means week-by-week. Anyway, my suggestion is, if you're going to take large-scale issue with the wording of this caption that many editors have added, I would propose it at the Songs or Music WikiProject and see what the editors there think. However, from what I've seen, you're the only to change it because you think it's not accurate or will be misunderstood. Ss 112 00:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Can you stop removing factual information on my wikipedia page please? And stop putting the chart position into the chart performance section? You realize if you do that, you have to do it to every song? Jordantrsonlychild ( talk) 17:56, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Dude you have 40 Kinds of Sadness on the page for years now with rarely any information but you have that on here but youre over here worried about the “irrelevant” information about Big Time Rush Big Night. Pretty sure Big Night is more notable than 40 Kinds of Sadness. Whats your point? Jordantrsonlychild ( talk) 18:16, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
I also suggest maybe looking into the Shine On page and Say page too because it has little information about it. And the Take It All Away page has no sources. You should look into those just a suggestion from me. Jordantrsonlychild ( talk) 18:25, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Sorry i meant to put Say Jordantrsonlychild ( talk) 18:26, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. I will continue to learn. Happy new years to you too. Jordantrsonlychild ( talk) 18:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Empire AS
Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Empire AS Talk! 13:14, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I’m a little bit confused. Why did you remove the category on the redirect of The Lorax Singers? CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 06:28, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Oh. I wasn’t saying it was notable. I didn’t know the category was fake. But the reason the redirect exists is probably cause they have several streams of their songs on Spotify. That isn’t notable, though, so I guess there is no reason. You are right about how there is no band mention in the page it redirects to. It could redirect to the Soundtrack section, because that’s close, as a lot of the songs on iTunes often say “(feat. The Lorax Singers)” but it dosen’t say that on the articles. So it probably should be deleted. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 09:04, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
For your revert on the redirect of Bing Bong Zoo, I understand what you mean. I didn’t know that redirects didn’t have that. CheatCodes4ever ( talk) 09:05, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Music Barnstar | |
In recognition of your 8 January 2020 assistance with the
Sports (Huey Lewis and the News album) article, and your ongoing
contributions to the many music articles and categories on Wikipedia, I hereby confer upon you a
barnstar. Thank you for all that you do. Christopher, Sheridan, OR ( talk) 05:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC) |
This Barnstar award was placed on your talk page due to permanent red-linked user page, per your request.
With an {{Archive box}} in place, please feel free to move this award as you see fit.
Christopher, Sheridan, OR (
talk)
05:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Can you please indicate the areas which you feel require references on the article All Aboard the Skylark for you to remove the refimprove tag that you added. 86.177.106.70 ( talk) 20:09, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
Thankyou for the edits you've made on All That Jazz (Breathe album) and related pages. I appreciate your guidance. Is there anyway I can ask you a couple of specific style-related questions? ICT7 ( talk) 10:31, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Category:Robotboy characters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TTN ( talk) 18:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
I know why you made this edit but if you're planning on making more, I'd like to give a friendly suggestion to explain why in the edit summary, as not everyone knows that they editorial staff of AMG give out the star ratings and not the reviewers. Alternately, you could of course reword it but that's more overhead. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 01:16, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi There I'm Just Letting You Know That An User Called User talk:188.148.203.46 Messed Up The Tracks On Thriller 25. When I Went To Look At The Article The Track listing Is Weird. I'm Not Sure How To Fixed It. Thanks From JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 4:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
The corresponding photo of Monty Python is categorized under Monty Python. Why do you think this is improper? JustinTime55 ( talk) 15:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Is there any specific section that you think needs sources? I can take a look then. The Banner talk 18:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bow Wow's Untitled Seventh Studio album. Since you had some involvement with the Bow Wow's Untitled Seventh Studio album redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC 678 19:09, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanx for correcting my misnaming Snarky Puppy's live album. I have to ask, though, why did you put in a redirect page rather than just correcting the name on the Snarky Puppy page? I did so and tagged the redirect for speedy deletion. GWFrog ( talk) 21:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
I Need Some Help On The Very Best of Kiss I Try To Upload A New AllMusic Review, Rolling Stone Review And Sputnikmusic And Its Looks Weird. Can You Please Fixed The Review. Thanks From JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 7:14, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Always good seeing your name pop up in page history again :) Thanks again for reviewing Don't Cry For No Hipster and your other jazz article work. RubenSchade ( talk) 01:32, 21 April 2020 (UTC) |
Hello. For the record, I had to move Atkins (album) to a separate draft article for it. I am currently looking for sources about the album. Thanks. -- TheLennyGriffinFan1994 ( talk) 22:11, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
E.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=To_Memphis%2C_with_Love&type=revision&diff=952949149&oldid=866330266 Why are you removing the categories when you redirect these album articles? ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 02:04, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
Never mind i did fixed it. Can you please add disc 2 track listings? and the running time is 1:18:50 for disc 2 for the 40 (Foreigner album)
Thanks From JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 8:28 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Whats with you removing all of the chart information I added to It's a Jungle? You know how long it took me to find, organize, and cite all of that? The info lasted for a little over a month before you somehow found the dead page and removed it because "no radio station charts". I figured given that the song had an MTV music video created for it (for some reason you also removed the MTV part from the page) that got lots of screenplay it had to have been a hit even though Billboard's Hot 100 wrote it off. I sought out to find some charts and turned out to be correct, so I figured I'd add them to the page. But nope, for some reason adding airplay charts for singles is not allowed according to you. Trying to be helpful by adding new information to the site is a bad thing. All those hours I spent searching for that stuff and formatting it correctly into charts went down the drain. You also removed some of my citations because they apparently weren't reliable, and added Citation Needed in a few spots. The information there is factual, and it isn't my fault that the only way to prove it is through an eBay listing. Like I said, I searched for many hours and that just turned out to be the only source for the info. I highly doubt you know anything deep about Three Dog Night's history, and you've even had the audacity to make many nonsensical/useless edits on other articles about the band.
Just curious about your thought process and reasoning. Tine Crine ( talk) 01:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
A user called User talk:JJMC89 have been removing the album cover from a Wikipedia page called Look of Love: The Very Best of ABC he keeps on removing the album cover. I'm not sure what to do, he could be a bot.
Thanks from JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 9:57 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi – would you mind taking a quick look at this category and fixing the entry, please? It should be a filename, rather than a picture, but I can't see how to correct this. Thanks. Richard3120 ( talk) 15:46, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
[1] clearly is showing this. I have removed the images, with the explanation that they are not added to the article until the year is complete ( [2]). Though I don't know about any specific guideline to this effect, I am remembering this from past years and wanting to respect it. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 15:46, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
I've stated my views on the template at TfD... the creator has also created a category for those draft albums at Category:The Vinyls albums... can this be speedily deleted? Richard3120 ( talk) 20:56, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
When I import The Jam Gold CD to Itunes, the CD lookup results comes up with two options saying The Sound of the Jam and Gold. Is iTunes right about The Sound of The Jam and Gold are both the same albums or is the CD lookup results from iTunes are wrong? I'm just wondering because i notice some albums have been re-issued as Gold. Is it possible to add the Gold information back to The Sound of the Jam or not?
Thanks from JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 3:11 17 May 2020 (UTC)
@Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Thanks for your comment and about the iTunes lookup results I mentioned above. From JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 4:08 May 2020 (UTC)
Good afternoon Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
When I import The Jam Gold CD to Itunes, the CD lookup results comes up with two options saying The Sound of the Jam and Gold. Is iTunes right about The Sound of The Jam and Gold are both the same albums or is the CD lookup results from iTunes are wrong?
JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 12:39 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Is this where you were trying to get to with these two redirects? I had the pageswap reversed. Not sure why it was done in the first place, possibly a mistake and some crossed wires. Villain (Album) could possibly be deleted entirely, it adds nothing. Lithopsian ( talk) 20:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi User:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, I think Talk:Waitin' for the Bus / Jesus Just Left Chicago might also need a redirect? Thanks. Martinevans123 ( talk) 20:56, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Good Afternoon Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
I'm just wondering if I can add disc 2 to The Sound of the Jam because it's been mentioned on the article. I just wanted to check with you to see if that is okay before i add the second disc with the track listings?
Thanks so much from JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 9:43 21 May 2020 (UTC)
JukeboxMan1990 ( talk) 9:05 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello. Can you please clarify why you are continually removing the category, "Country albums by American artists" from album pages? ChrisTofu11961 ( talk) 15:06, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Please do not remove {{ LR}} tag from Recover (The Naked and Famous album) until the issue is resolved. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 17:27, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing my copy and paste error. As you may see from my edits, I'm trying to do a lot of things at once. ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 23:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
What I would argue is this. The articles for charts in 1988 it seems have been deleted because the charts were not compiled by the Official Charts Company (OCC). However, what I would say is this: As an example, the The Official Big Top 40 is not compiled by the Official Charts Company, and therefore having the word "official" in the company name is by no means proof of de facto officiality, although OCC is clearly universally accepted as such by most people. Secondly, the deleted charts of 1988 were in fact compiled by the now defunct MRIB, who, were a rival to OCC (at the time called Gallup and then CIN) and were considered of equal importance and reliability to OCC. The OCC chart just so happened to be used by BBC Radio 1 and the now defunct Top of the Pops TV show. Pretty much every other TV and radio show of the day used the MRIB compiled singles chart. This may cause problems given that OCC is universally accepted as the "official" chart provider of the UK, however, I think on Wikipedia we have the opportunity to look into things in more detail and be more accurate. Also, I don't think OCC were compiling any rock or dance charts at this time, so MRIB's seem to be the accredited charts for them at the time. Cheers. QuintusPetillius ( talk) 13:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of UK Dance Singles Chart number ones of 1988. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. QuintusPetillius ( talk) 13:59, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Dear Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars/Archive 11,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.
Best regards, Chris Troutman ( talk) 19:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Hi – following the discussion regarding the reorganization of Billboard's Rock and Alternative Songs charts, the query has come up at Wikipedia talk:Record charts#Billboard charts - Albums as to whether the same applies to albums in these categories... the current documentation only accounts for R&B/Hip Hop album charts. Can you shed any light on this? Thanks. Richard3120 ( talk) 23:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Hey there, you probably should have mentioned that in the CFD. I think your rationale is reasonable although I don't think I've really seen it spelled out that way. Perhaps you'd want to propose a clearer delineation for film vs. film series at WT:CFD, perhaps as an WP:RFC? I think this might be a discussion about a wider naming guideline. If you feel like I have misrepresented the consensus and closed erroneously in the Sandlot discussion specifically, you're more than welcome to make a listing at WP:MR. Cheers, bibliomaniac 1 5 00:43, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I was just wondering why you reverted back the proposed deletion template on the [[ talk page of List of Canadian Hot 100 top 10 singles in 2020? It has valid information, reliable sources, and has been going strong for 8 months of the Billboard chart year. I would hate to see all its progress be gone. I thought everything was clear to be taken off, since I explained my objection on my user talk page and edit summary of the article. Is there more that has to be done to prevent it from getting deleted? Just a little confused, that's all. Thanks. ( Purplehaze45 ( talk) 18:37, 4 August 2020 (UTC))
I was looking for where you proposed making the kind of change that you have already made for the 1960 and 1961 lists, and found it here (for reference). In the 1960 one, I made a suggestion to indicate which songs listed under the first issue date of that year initially made the top 10 prior to that first week ... just a simple footnote attached at the end of each song title which would be found in the preceding year's list (near the end, if we were to make the same changes to the 1959 list). I was scratching my head as to whether to do this for titles near the end of the year that continued their run in the top 10 into the next, but decided to not do that for now.
In your initial proposal here, you wanted to remove the "weeks in the top ten" column, but I saw you didn't do that in the changes you recently made to 1960/1961 (at least for now). While you did cite WP:CHARTTRAJ, and I have mixed feelings about its inclusion or exclusion (I do have one Joel Whitburn book that can back these tallies, thru 2011, but I don't mind either way), it's probably something that editors may try to keep adding back if we do exclude the column ... especially on the current lists ... even though it goes against CHARTTRAJ, so we'd have to be even extra vigilant about that.
Even making the change to have everything in just one table for the current list, and focused squarely on the year identified in the title of the list, would cause some editors to revert it back to the multiple table appearance there is now. (I do recall recently making a bold change to the "Notes" structure in the 2020 list, using the {{ efn}} and {{ notelist}} templates [3] [4] [5] [6], so that it would be easier to see the note right by the song or artist in question instead of having to scroll down the article every time, but one editor decided against it [7], and I decided not to push the issue any further.) I think it's a good idea to limit the scope, and having the one table, but having a talk page discussion at the current article might not hurt to see where the other editors in the project are on this. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 18:46, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Anyway, I took a stab at your update to 1960 and 1961 by applying that to the 1958 and 1959 articles. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 16:56, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
An IP has objected to your/my changes at the 1960 article [8]. I have reverted it for now; it's sounding like there could be more objections to this revised format, despite violations of WP:IINFO that you have brought up. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 15:45, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Same at 1961 [9]. MPFitz1968 ( talk) 15:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello, @ Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars, thank you so much for correcting my edits, also if you don't mind helping getting the article Gabi DeMartino edits back, they don't want to add info for her because she's a member of duo Niki and Gabi, but DeMartino also releases solo projects, other group members has there own articles even when they don't do solo projects but still have articles, i still don't understand why, thanks! Gabriella Grande ( talk) 03:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
You said "Charting doesn't make these notable," could you ellaborate on that? Is this the reason nobody has updated these pages for 5 years? I am very frustrated and confused.
Trevortnidesserped ( talk) 22:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Hey Starcheers and @ Richard3120: I noticed you'd both edited a number of this editor's recent articles. I took a look earlier, and this editor's sheer output of articles on non-notable albums is staggering. I raised this on their talk page, pointing them to WP:NALBUMS, but they appear to have no other defence for their articles than "they are notable", and I doubt they're willing to change their tune or halt this prolific number of articles they pump out daily. Could either one of you start an ANI thread to bring further attention to this? (As I'm still "semi-retired", I'm sure why I'm concerned or starting an ANI thread would be questioned.) I don't believe it would gather much traction at any music WikiProject, as none of those are as active as the attention to this editor's back catalogue of non-notable albums warrants. This has been going on for God knows how many months or years now, and the hundreds or thousands of articles of this editor's created articles to trawl through and assess for notability needs all the attention it can get. I don't believe I or any one or two editors could get through to this editor on stopping this practice either. Thanks! Ss 112 07:57, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi, hope you're fine. I want to create a template named ' Template:Educational boards in Pakistan' from this article List of educational boards in Pakistan. Is it right to create such a template? Thank you. Empire AS Talk! 07:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for this edit. I didn't take a look at the template's usage guidelines prior to publishing the edit, I was using the top of this page as a guide. I'll be careful to do more research next time round. Appreciate you letting me know. Sean Stephens ( talk) 13:29, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi. I don't understand why you feel it necessary to move these mathematics categories (e.g. Category:Draft-Class mathematics pages) to their new names. These categories have insignificant editing history and I have already created the new ones. — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 14:57, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Did you mean to tag for deletion all of these mathematical article categories that are full of pages (see Category:Candidates for uncontroversial speedy deletion)? Liz Read! Talk! 19:59, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I have a question about your deletion of the So Fresh: The Hits of Autumn 2013 page (and redirect to the main So Fresh list). While I understand the premise of there being no significant coverage, I have recently had an article approved through the AfC process which was basically in the same format and many of the individual So Fresh album pages have similar limited information on them. Given the approval of the article through the AfC process, I assumed it would be okay to continue in that vein.
Basically it would be great if you could explain the inconsistency in treatment between album pages? The reason why I started making the pages is because I was looking up So Fresh albums on Wikipedia out of curiosity and all the red links on the So Fresh list made me sad so I wanted to rectify it. If any album page I make is going to be redirected to the main list anyway, then I see no point in having all the red links? I'm not going to die on this hill or anything but to me it does seem misleading to have red links on the list page, but when a user makes a page (in keeping with the format of the other preceding albums), that the page is effectively deleted.
Thanks in advance. -- L84tea ( talk) 02:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates § Naming of navbox categories. — andrybak ( talk) 14:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
I see your name a lot around Wikipedia and there are many edits you have made that I appreciate, so thank you for those. There are currently discussions going on about whether the Britney Spears albums ...Baby One More Time and Oops!... I Did It Again should be moved:
I'd love for you to voice your opinion there. Thank you.
Thank you for your cleanup efforts on the Kitty Wells albums. With respect to Kitty Wells' & Red Foley's Golden Favorites, I have tended not to include compilation albums but made an exception for this one, as it is the only album to my knowledge which collected all of their charting singles from the 1950s. Also, it's my understanding that the compilation charted as an album on its own. While I own Whitburn's "The Billboard Book of Top 40 Country Hits", I seem to have misplaced my copy of "Joel Whitburn Presents Hot Country Albums". Do you happen to know of a reliable online source to confirm chart performance of country albums of the 1960s? Thanks for any help you may be able to provide. Cbl62 ( talk) 23:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
I noticed your edit summary ( here) on Sands of Gold stating that the named reviewers don't assign the "AllMusic Rating" to the albums. If the reviewer doesn't give the rating, who does? User Ratings are separate, and so I assumed the official "AllMusic Rating" was by the reviewer. Is there documentation of this somewhere on the AllMusic site? Thanks for your input. Cbl62 ( talk)
I noticed you moved " In the Jailhouse Now (1982 album)" to " In the Jailhouse Now (album)". I started the article with the secondary disambiguation due to the existence of other albums (including other Webb Pierce albums) with the same title. E.g., here, here, here, here, here, and here. Is it not typical practice for albums to use secondary disambiguation when other albums exist with the same title? Cbl62 ( talk) 02:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Best Selection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Best Selection. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:09, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Good morning, I'd like to ask if you can check Treat Myself (Victoria Justice song) and see if the page still needs the notability tag. Thanks 151.40.228.74 ( talk) 10:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
★Trekker (
talk) is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec16a}}~~~~ to your friends' talk pages.
★Trekker ( talk) 17:41, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
You are the only editor I have seen take issue with or misconstrue this caption. "Weekly chart performance" is perfectly apt—it means performance on charts that are issued weekly. If it meant "week-by-week", like a chart trajectory, the caption would say "week-by-week". Besides, if it weren't already clear, there is always a column below the caption saying "peak position" on those weekly charts. I just don't see how weekly means week-by-week. Anyway, my suggestion is, if you're going to take large-scale issue with the wording of this caption that many editors have added, I would propose it at the Songs or Music WikiProject and see what the editors there think. However, from what I've seen, you're the only to change it because you think it's not accurate or will be misunderstood. Ss 112 00:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Can you stop removing factual information on my wikipedia page please? And stop putting the chart position into the chart performance section? You realize if you do that, you have to do it to every song? Jordantrsonlychild ( talk) 17:56, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Dude you have 40 Kinds of Sadness on the page for years now with rarely any information but you have that on here but youre over here worried about the “irrelevant” information about Big Time Rush Big Night. Pretty sure Big Night is more notable than 40 Kinds of Sadness. Whats your point? Jordantrsonlychild ( talk) 18:16, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
I also suggest maybe looking into the Shine On page and Say page too because it has little information about it. And the Take It All Away page has no sources. You should look into those just a suggestion from me. Jordantrsonlychild ( talk) 18:25, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Sorry i meant to put Say Jordantrsonlychild ( talk) 18:26, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. I will continue to learn. Happy new years to you too. Jordantrsonlychild ( talk) 18:35, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Empire AS
Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Empire AS Talk! 13:14, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |