A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shoot To Kill (DS Mixtape), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Alientraveller (
talk)
00:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to
Mean Girls, it is recommended that you use the
preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces
edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up
recent changes and the
page history. Thank you.
Ward3001 (
talk)
21:22, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
There is no need to link the same name three times in an infobox. Chris Nolan is one person three bluelinks are of no use. Stop the overlinking. Darrenhusted ( talk) 20:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment on the Tribune Tower. Your story is interesting and plausible — however, "what a security guard told me" is original research, and is not a verifiable statement published in a reliable source. If you could review those policies and find such a source, I would gladly leave this item in the article; but as it is, we have no way of knowing that you're not (unwittingly or otherwise) propagating an urban myth. Kevin Forsyth ( talk) 11:55, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Tribune Tower, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Kevin Forsyth (
talk)
17:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Please note that by continuing to insert this information without responding to my multiple requests for a reliable source, you are at risk of violating Wikipedia policy regarding edit warring. As I cannot revert your edit at this time without violating WP:3RR myself, it will stand for now, but in the meantime I will move this discussion to the Tribune Tower talk page for consensus-building. Please respond there. Kevin Forsyth ( talk) 17:50, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
That is funny man. I checked your page for a while to see if you fixed it, and I guess it snuck past you. I saw your page after an edit we made on the same article and I couldn't resist the temptation. On a more serious note though, the Phillies are who scares me the most about playing my Cards in the playoffs. No hard feelings though. Just goofin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Backvoods ( talk • contribs) 21:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
I am curious about this edit. I assume it is based on reliable sources. Could you point kindly point me to those sources so that I may read them for myself? Dlabtot ( talk) 03:40, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Is there a reason that you are edit-warring over the location of an image? I've provided a rationale as to why I moved the image and you moved it back without discussing on the talk or providing an edit summary. The image's location looks horrible because the text looks discontinuous if you put an left-aligned image right under the level-2 header with very little text under it. MOS:IMAGE might help here. — KV5 • Talk • 20:18, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:PPL_Park3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot ( talk) 00:38, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:PPL_Park3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot ( talk) 00:10, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Mls-philadelphia-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:47, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
Football (soccer) barnstar | |
For you diligent efforts on articles related to the Philadelphia Union and Major League Soccer I award you this barnstar. Keep up the good work! SkotyWA T C 03:51, 13 August 2010 (UTC) |
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2010NYCosmos.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- MGA73 ( talk) 07:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Brad-Knighton1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 05:06, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi. If you're going to update the game log on 2010 Philadelphia Phillies season and the like, please update the "record vs. opponents" table as well so that the article is in sync. If it's not, it makes the article incorrect. Thanks. — KV5 • Talk • 13:22, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
This is a template. Somehow the information for 2011 Philadelphia Union season has been put in it and all the documentation for the template has been deleted. As you seem to be the last editor of this page, would you take care of this and have the maker of the template fix it so that it does not generate DEFAULTSORT conflicts? Thank you. JimCubb ( talk) 01:55, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey, just FYI; I don't want to get into an edit war about something as stupid as photo placement, but so you know: I didn't right-justify it because it looks better than on the left (or vice-versa) - it has nothing to do with aesthetics, and it's not an WP:ILIKEIT issue. Having the photo justified to the left actually causes paragraph alignment and row alignment errors on my screen, which means that it likely causes paragraph alignment and row alignment errors for other readers too. Maybe you don't see them with whatever screen resolution you have, but I assure you they ARE there, and the photo needs to be on the right in order to cure this. -- JonBroxton ( talk) 05:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Sheanon Williams.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.philadelphiaunion.com/content/union-1-fire-0. As a copyright violation, File:Sheanon Williams.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Sheanon Williams.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. ccwaters ( talk) 20:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Are you affiliated with the Union in anyway? ccwaters ( talk) 20:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Keon Daniel Union.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://sports.yahoo.com/mls/games/2011061129/gallery/im:urn:newsml:sports.yahoo,getty:20050301:mls,photo,dfa70894ac9027c5d2a097642a770f1c-getty-109261557hm014_salt_lake_union:1. As a copyright violation, File:Keon Daniel Union.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Keon Daniel Union.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. TerminalPreppie ( talk) 18:16, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Faryd Mondragón Union.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof ( talk) 21:36, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, the images you uploaded here and were moved by other users to Commons are now listed for deletion. Your input would be greatly appreciated at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by User:Spinerod. Thanks. -- Mosmof ( talk) 11:32, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Please remove the flags you added to MLS franchise articles without having read WP:MOSFLAG -- Walter Görlitz ( talk) 03:04, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
The article Jimmy McLaughlin (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Bgwhite (
talk)
07:46, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jimmy McLaughlin (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy McLaughlin (soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bgwhite ( talk) 20:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Philadelphia Union season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicago Fire ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Chandler Hoffman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 18:34, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
The article Levi Houapeu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
18:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
The article Ray Gaddis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
18:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
The article Greg Jordan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
18:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
When contesting the proposed deletion of an article, as you did with Ray Gaddis and Greg Jordan, please explain your reason for doing so in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 22:10, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you changed Kasey Keller's international cap total from 101 to 102 without any revision summary notes. I'm not sure where you got the 102 cap total from.
FIFA.com explicitly lists him as having 101 caps as to 2 December 2011 and I'm 10000000% sure he didn't make any international appearances after that date.
I am reverting the total back to 101 as per the official international cap list from FIFA. See here: http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/fifafacts/stats-centclub/52/00/59/fifacenturyclubmen.pdf
Acmilan10italia ( talk) 12:52, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
The article 2012 Philadelphia Union Reserves season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
08:47, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Seasons of reserve and amateur teams are not considered notable enough to merit standalone articles.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in
Articles for deletion debates, as you did with
2011 Philadelphia Union Reserves season. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please
comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
22:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Greg Jordan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 14:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ray Gaddis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 14:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Ray Gaddis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Philadelphia Union season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dan Kennedy and Carlos Valdés ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Bakary Soumaré, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2. Bundesliga ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 Philadelphia Union season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny O'Rourke ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conor Casey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oberliga Südwest ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Voice (Seinfeld), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Butt ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 21:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Philadelphia Union season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Magee ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Spinerod. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Spinerod. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Spinerod. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Shoot To Kill (DS Mixtape), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Alientraveller (
talk)
00:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to
Mean Girls, it is recommended that you use the
preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces
edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up
recent changes and the
page history. Thank you.
Ward3001 (
talk)
21:22, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
There is no need to link the same name three times in an infobox. Chris Nolan is one person three bluelinks are of no use. Stop the overlinking. Darrenhusted ( talk) 20:58, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment on the Tribune Tower. Your story is interesting and plausible — however, "what a security guard told me" is original research, and is not a verifiable statement published in a reliable source. If you could review those policies and find such a source, I would gladly leave this item in the article; but as it is, we have no way of knowing that you're not (unwittingly or otherwise) propagating an urban myth. Kevin Forsyth ( talk) 11:55, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Tribune Tower, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Kevin Forsyth (
talk)
17:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Please note that by continuing to insert this information without responding to my multiple requests for a reliable source, you are at risk of violating Wikipedia policy regarding edit warring. As I cannot revert your edit at this time without violating WP:3RR myself, it will stand for now, but in the meantime I will move this discussion to the Tribune Tower talk page for consensus-building. Please respond there. Kevin Forsyth ( talk) 17:50, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
That is funny man. I checked your page for a while to see if you fixed it, and I guess it snuck past you. I saw your page after an edit we made on the same article and I couldn't resist the temptation. On a more serious note though, the Phillies are who scares me the most about playing my Cards in the playoffs. No hard feelings though. Just goofin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Backvoods ( talk • contribs) 21:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
I am curious about this edit. I assume it is based on reliable sources. Could you point kindly point me to those sources so that I may read them for myself? Dlabtot ( talk) 03:40, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Is there a reason that you are edit-warring over the location of an image? I've provided a rationale as to why I moved the image and you moved it back without discussing on the talk or providing an edit summary. The image's location looks horrible because the text looks discontinuous if you put an left-aligned image right under the level-2 header with very little text under it. MOS:IMAGE might help here. — KV5 • Talk • 20:18, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:PPL_Park3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot ( talk) 00:38, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:PPL_Park3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot ( talk) 00:10, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Mls-philadelphia-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk)
05:47, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
Football (soccer) barnstar | |
For you diligent efforts on articles related to the Philadelphia Union and Major League Soccer I award you this barnstar. Keep up the good work! SkotyWA T C 03:51, 13 August 2010 (UTC) |
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2010NYCosmos.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- MGA73 ( talk) 07:51, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Brad-Knighton1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. -- ImageTaggingBot ( talk) 05:06, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi. If you're going to update the game log on 2010 Philadelphia Phillies season and the like, please update the "record vs. opponents" table as well so that the article is in sync. If it's not, it makes the article incorrect. Thanks. — KV5 • Talk • 13:22, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
This is a template. Somehow the information for 2011 Philadelphia Union season has been put in it and all the documentation for the template has been deleted. As you seem to be the last editor of this page, would you take care of this and have the maker of the template fix it so that it does not generate DEFAULTSORT conflicts? Thank you. JimCubb ( talk) 01:55, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey, just FYI; I don't want to get into an edit war about something as stupid as photo placement, but so you know: I didn't right-justify it because it looks better than on the left (or vice-versa) - it has nothing to do with aesthetics, and it's not an WP:ILIKEIT issue. Having the photo justified to the left actually causes paragraph alignment and row alignment errors on my screen, which means that it likely causes paragraph alignment and row alignment errors for other readers too. Maybe you don't see them with whatever screen resolution you have, but I assure you they ARE there, and the photo needs to be on the right in order to cure this. -- JonBroxton ( talk) 05:54, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Sheanon Williams.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.philadelphiaunion.com/content/union-1-fire-0. As a copyright violation, File:Sheanon Williams.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Sheanon Williams.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. ccwaters ( talk) 20:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Are you affiliated with the Union in anyway? ccwaters ( talk) 20:25, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Keon Daniel Union.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://sports.yahoo.com/mls/games/2011061129/gallery/im:urn:newsml:sports.yahoo,getty:20050301:mls,photo,dfa70894ac9027c5d2a097642a770f1c-getty-109261557hm014_salt_lake_union:1. As a copyright violation, File:Keon Daniel Union.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Keon Daniel Union.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. TerminalPreppie ( talk) 18:16, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Faryd Mondragón Union.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mosmof ( talk) 21:36, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, the images you uploaded here and were moved by other users to Commons are now listed for deletion. Your input would be greatly appreciated at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by User:Spinerod. Thanks. -- Mosmof ( talk) 11:32, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:19, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Please remove the flags you added to MLS franchise articles without having read WP:MOSFLAG -- Walter Görlitz ( talk) 03:04, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
The article Jimmy McLaughlin (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Bgwhite (
talk)
07:46, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jimmy McLaughlin (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy McLaughlin (soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bgwhite ( talk) 20:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Philadelphia Union season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicago Fire ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Chandler Hoffman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 18:34, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
The article Levi Houapeu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
18:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
The article Ray Gaddis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
18:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
The article Greg Jordan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
18:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
When contesting the proposed deletion of an article, as you did with Ray Gaddis and Greg Jordan, please explain your reason for doing so in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 22:10, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed you changed Kasey Keller's international cap total from 101 to 102 without any revision summary notes. I'm not sure where you got the 102 cap total from.
FIFA.com explicitly lists him as having 101 caps as to 2 December 2011 and I'm 10000000% sure he didn't make any international appearances after that date.
I am reverting the total back to 101 as per the official international cap list from FIFA. See here: http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/fifafacts/stats-centclub/52/00/59/fifacenturyclubmen.pdf
Acmilan10italia ( talk) 12:52, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
The article 2012 Philadelphia Union Reserves season has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
08:47, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
Seasons of reserve and amateur teams are not considered notable enough to merit standalone articles.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in
Articles for deletion debates, as you did with
2011 Philadelphia Union Reserves season. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create
consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please
comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.
Sir Sputnik (
talk)
22:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Greg Jordan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 14:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ray Gaddis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik ( talk) 14:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Ray Gaddis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:47, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited 2012 Philadelphia Union season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dan Kennedy and Carlos Valdés ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:29, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Bakary Soumaré, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2. Bundesliga ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:39, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 Philadelphia Union season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny O'Rourke ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:27, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conor Casey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oberliga Südwest ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Voice (Seinfeld), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Butt ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 21:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Philadelphia Union season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Magee ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:40, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Spinerod. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Spinerod. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Spinerod. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)